~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | Strawman arguments and dress code propganda - thoughts on this?Shows the thinking right? If boys keep breaking a rule, boys need to be taught better. If girls keep breaking a rule, the rule needs to change | /r/MensRights | 20/05/18 10:52 PM |
| 78 | Strawman arguments and dress code propganda - thoughts on this?I think the "they are just body parts is also a terrible argument. Penis and balls are just body parts but that doesn't justify showing them off. Also, ever dress code I've seen applies to boys and girls (i.e. boys can't wear tank top or short shorts or show underwear). | /r/MensRights | 20/05/18 05:19 PM |
| 1 | Very good explanation on the Apex Fallacy that many feminists don't seem to understandHmm a blast from the past here. And all those conditions have varied tremendously with society, time period, and socioeconomic class (and would mostly affect women too, sterility rates have been equal in all recorded data I'm aware of). It doesn't have any consistency with history and so to say "well historically 30% of men ..." Is meaningless if not made up. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/18 02:07 PM |
| 1 | So once I had an inequality project in my english class. My parents reactions weren't that surprisingTesticular cancer is fairly rare and very treatable. Prostate cancer isn't a great comparator because it's almost exclusively in older populations and mostly very slow growing (these two facts make it really hard to tell what the true mortality if PC is). I'm not sure why we need an equivalent to BC. I think there's plenty to talk about with family court and criminal justice inequality. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/18 01:13 PM |
| 1 | B-but...being vulnerable is what the patriarchy wants! Also, wanting to advance in science & technology is also what the patriarchy wants therefore let's live in a cave to fight against the patriarchy!At first it was "be strong" so you didn't have to depend on men. Now it's"be vulnerable" so you have to depend on them. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/18 03:04 PM |
| 5 | So apparently men are the reason women underestimate their abilities when it comes to STEM subject areas. SmhIf you think they're bad, wait until you deal with NIH or EPA... | /r/MensRights | 06/04/18 05:45 PM |
| 3 | So apparently men are the reason women underestimate their abilities when it comes to STEM subject areas. SmhWelcome to real world science my dude! | /r/MensRights | 06/04/18 05:43 PM |
| 7 | Thoughts on shares like this?It's hard to objectively talk about what's decent and indecent but a good starting point is covering underwear. Any fashion that displays underwear is indecent. If you agree with this standard (which you should) then can you point to any mainstream dress codes that you think go too far? Making your underwear (includes sagging) or ass cheeks easy to see is unacceptable in a professional atmosphere. Can you explain how that standard is sexist? If not, I don't think you have an argument friend. And… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/18 05:29 PM |
| 18 | Thoughts on shares like this?You can argue all you like but without evidence it rationale behind it it's just nonsense. Dress codes are generally about covering up underwear (to be blunt). Clothing that shows off underwear is never appropriate in a work setting (unless you work in a few particular industries) why the hell should schools tolerate it? | /r/MensRights | 03/04/18 02:54 PM |
| 80 | Thoughts on shares like this?girls have a much more strict dress code This never rings true for me. Guys don't wear anything like tank tops, and don't wear anything that can show off their shoulders either (that would show off a bra strap). Short shorts are also unacceptable for boys, so what exactly can a boy wear that a girl can't? Just because girls violate dress codes more doesn't mean it's more strict. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/18 02:48 PM |
| 3 | Texas bill would fine men $100 every time they masterbaitextremely difficult for women to get abortions Well they performed over 55 thousand in Texas alone so ... | /r/MensRights | 26/03/18 05:23 PM |
| 15 | But women not doing chores despite not working isn’t misandrist?If these women were competent they'd do something with their time besides write about "subtle misogyny" | /r/MensRights | 23/03/18 04:02 PM |
| 11 | I thought Feminism was about not making gross generalizations based on genderIt presupposes that bullying is based on identity group instead of individual traits/environment. All these people can see is labels | /r/MensRights | 23/03/18 02:13 PM |
| 5 | Feminist group wants to shut down France's first ever sex dolls brothel because they argue that it encourages a culture of rape, but the police say it's legal.I mean, I'm not sure if prostate cancer is the topic I would go to in a men's only space but I get your point! For what it's worth, there are billions of women in the world, only a small fraction are this crazy. They get a disproportionate voice and political power, but good to remember most women are great, at least better than sex dolls! But if a guy wants a doll, it's no one's business but his own. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/18 07:56 PM |
| 16 | Feminist group wants to shut down France's first ever sex dolls brothel because they argue that it encourages a culture of rape, but the police say it's legal.something tells me that feminists will never be happy That something is these feminists themselves. Sjw are fueled by their own misery and so they want to change society to try to make themselves feel better. But it won't work so they stay miserable. Here they are upset over something that literally doesn't involve them but they still insist it will lead to more rapes because they don't know how else to cope with their feelings. I'm not sure how many are maliciously motivated to try and control … | /r/MensRights | 20/03/18 06:38 PM |
| 9 | "International Men's Day is the other 364 days of the year" - What's a good comeback?Then I expect 364 thank you posts for all men over the next year. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/18 04:21 PM |
| 5 | Liberal and leftist men dumping their feminist girlfriends, feminist fails to put 2 and 2 togetherRight????! | /r/MensRights | 28/02/18 09:45 PM |
| 8 | Liberal and leftist men dumping their feminist girlfriends, feminist fails to put 2 and 2 togetherNo man has ever been threatened? Glad to know! Thanks feminists!! | /r/MensRights | 28/02/18 09:40 PM |
| 6 | That's enough Internet for today.So the entire female experience is summarized by being penetrated? That sounds like women are sex objects... | /r/MensRights | 17/02/18 10:57 PM |
| 21 | This, right here, this:I wish he said more about his painting | /r/MensRights | 12/02/18 08:20 PM |
| -5 | Men with prostate cancer have access to fewer specialist nurses than patients with other cancers…despite it being a bigger killer than breast cancerIt's a little more complicated than the narrative though... The number of nurses available is more related to frequency of disease not mortality. And BC is far more prevalent in far younger populations. Deaths from PC are also harder to track since it occurs almost exclusively in older men and is very slow growing (i.e. takes a long time to be fatal). It's not uncommon for a man diagnosed with PC to die of something else long before the cancer would kill him. From the site, it's a little unclear… | /r/MensRights | 06/02/18 06:15 PM |
| 2 | Good response when someone says "Do we even need a men's rights movement?"It wasn't for me. I had to go and register myself | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 07:29 PM |
| 3 | Good response when someone says "Do we even need a men's rights movement?"Yeah! I suspect very few (if anyone) has ever gone to prison just because it the selective service but it's a threat they like to use that only works on males... | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 04:23 PM |
| 3 | Men can get breast cancer too. Let's add blue to the pink ribbon.22% isn't that bad. Many cancers are near 100% and are much more frequent. Some types of breast cancers are considerably higher than that as well. | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 03:49 PM |
| 3 | Men can get breast cancer too. Let's add blue to the pink ribbon.Lol cardio vascular disease has no problems getting funding. Hell cholesterol and blood pressure drugs are some of the most prescribed drugs. | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 03:45 PM |
| 5 | Good response when someone says "Do we even need a men's rights movement?"Refusing to sign up for selective service is a felony punishable with a fine up to 250k or 5 years jail time. I mean, yeah they aren't going to throw the max penalty at you for signing up 31 days after your birthday but they have legal authority to jail you if you don't sign up. | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 03:39 PM |
| 2 | Woman considers she has "been forced" to perform oral sex by man whom she was dating where she could have said no, but did not say no because the power dynamic was surreal and she wanted him to like her. [Lol up vote for best laugh of the day. You're doing God's work. | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 02:54 PM |
| 2 | Feminists be like: "We want equal rights! Just don't give them to men!"No one wants crappy bake sale cupcakes. They are just monitizing a myth. If you believe the myth pay me please | /r/MensRights | 24/01/18 07:35 PM |
| 10 | What is: SubjectivityArrest her because you feel like she may have committed a crime. Also feelings can't be faked? Even a toddler knows how to fake feelings for self gain. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/18 07:25 PM |
| 3 | Man has erection while sleeping = rapeDon't be ridiculous. She just needs to bind her offensive breasts. No dick bulge and no clevage for America | /r/MensRights | 23/01/18 02:07 PM |
| 12 | "Equal rights are human rights." "Whatever happened to women and children first?" oh the irony... Seen at today's Women's March.Lol sorry I missed the survey where they determined to demographics of Nazis. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/18 01:18 AM |
| 1 | Keanu Reeves was sued by a woman who suggested that he used hypnosis and impersonated her ex-husband to impregnate her. She sought $3 million in spousal support from the actor, and $150,000/month, retroactively, in child support. DNA test proved he was not the father and the suit was thrown out.That's all very true. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/18 08:44 PM |
| 0 | I believe male victims of rape more than female victims. Is this bad, or is it an analysis of benefits?!...I ... What? I'm a subscriber to mra and t_d. I'm not interested in name-calling anyone a misogynist (in serious at least). I do however think it's important for ideas to hold up to scrutiny, especially when they are unpopular like mra. You made two statements that I think are mutually exclusive. I asked you how you can both believe men are more reliable with rape accusations without thinking women are more likely to lie. Two posts later, it's still not clear since you seem to be afraid I'm go… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/18 08:01 PM |
| 0 | I believe male victims of rape more than female victims. Is this bad, or is it an analysis of benefits?!I mean... Either you misunderstood the question or you're deflecting lol. Does the fact men have less incentives to lie make their stories more believable? If so, doesn't that have to mean you think women are more likely to lie about rape (or else why would men be more believable) | /r/MensRights | 18/01/18 07:23 PM |
| 1 | I believe male victims of rape more than female victims. Is this bad, or is it an analysis of benefits?!Your wording is extremely careful so I am curious about clarification: you said you don't think women are more likely to lie (thus you don't think men are less likely to lie). Are you, like the OP, more likely to believe men because they have less incentive? If so, how do you justify that without thinking that men are less likely to lie? How do you connect the less incentive to lie with men being more believable without believing they are less likely to lie? | /r/MensRights | 18/01/18 06:55 PM |
| 0 | I believe male victims of rape more than female victims. Is this bad, or is it an analysis of benefits?!Yeah, not meaningless but still not very steady. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/18 06:40 PM |
| 1 | Keanu Reeves was sued by a woman who suggested that he used hypnosis and impersonated her ex-husband to impregnate her. She sought $3 million in spousal support from the actor, and $150,000/month, retroactively, in child support. DNA test proved he was not the father and the suit was thrown out.a single positive thing a DNA test could help the family 1) done. My father in law had a previous marriage. During the divorce, she threatened to withhold their son saying she would say it wasn't his denying him visitation. They got a paternity test and boom her claim was denied before it entered the court. They worked out visitation without bothering a single Court fee. The son didn't have to get dragged through the courts and got to visit his dad (which would otherwise be withheld until the co… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/18 06:39 PM |
| 5 | I believe male victims of rape more than female victims. Is this bad, or is it an analysis of benefits?!I'd be careful about giving too much weight to incentive. It assumes people are rational. Moose's law states that there are plenty of assholes who do asshole things for no perceived gain. Additionally, just because someone has incentive to lie, doesn't mean they are lying. I could tell you I had a dog named Scarlett when I was five. Someone could offer me a million dollars to make that claim and I'd be a lot more vocal, but it's not any less true if that makes sense. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/18 06:12 PM |
| 2 | Keanu Reeves was sued by a woman who suggested that he used hypnosis and impersonated her ex-husband to impregnate her. She sought $3 million in spousal support from the actor, and $150,000/month, retroactively, in child support. DNA test proved he was not the father and the suit was thrown out.Well I feel the same way when I see Springer (or saw back in the 90s when it was relevant). I think you may be romanticizing the law banning paternity tests. I think it's more about giving the courts more power to regulate family financial responsibility instead of letting families decide outside the courts. I'm just not convinced that law really helps families... If the issue was just false negatives, then you could just regulate the tests tighter (FDA wouldn't recommend new regulations on such… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/18 05:40 PM |
| 3 | Keanu Reeves was sued by a woman who suggested that he used hypnosis and impersonated her ex-husband to impregnate her. She sought $3 million in spousal support from the actor, and $150,000/month, retroactively, in child support. DNA test proved he was not the father and the suit was thrown out.ahem mmmmmmmaaaaaaaaaalllllleeeeee :) | /r/MensRights | 18/01/18 02:18 PM |
| 1 | Keanu Reeves was sued by a woman who suggested that he used hypnosis and impersonated her ex-husband to impregnate her. She sought $3 million in spousal support from the actor, and $150,000/month, retroactively, in child support. DNA test proved he was not the father and the suit was thrown out.Anti hypno spray | /r/MensRights | 18/01/18 12:52 PM |
| 1 | Keanu Reeves was sued by a woman who suggested that he used hypnosis and impersonated her ex-husband to impregnate her. She sought $3 million in spousal support from the actor, and $150,000/month, retroactively, in child support. DNA test proved he was not the father and the suit was thrown out.I like to think that the logic was "yeah this is crazy, but easiest thing is do the dna test and don't even give someone the chance to entertain it's validity" | /r/MensRights | 18/01/18 12:52 PM |
| 2 | Keanu Reeves was sued by a woman who suggested that he used hypnosis and impersonated her ex-husband to impregnate her. She sought $3 million in spousal support from the actor, and $150,000/month, retroactively, in child support. DNA test proved he was not the father and the suit was thrown out.Does being gay protect you from accusations? | /r/MensRights | 18/01/18 12:34 PM |
| 2 | Keanu Reeves was sued by a woman who suggested that he used hypnosis and impersonated her ex-husband to impregnate her. She sought $3 million in spousal support from the actor, and $150,000/month, retroactively, in child support. DNA test proved he was not the father and the suit was thrown out.Tough crowd | /r/MensRights | 18/01/18 12:33 PM |
| 1 | Keanu Reeves was sued by a woman who suggested that he used hypnosis and impersonated her ex-husband to impregnate her. She sought $3 million in spousal support from the actor, and $150,000/month, retroactively, in child support. DNA test proved he was not the father and the suit was thrown out.So ban tests with an unacceptable failure rate and have instructions to take the test twice. There's probably already a standard in place or else I could sell Moose paternity test kit which features a coin with patented Flipez technology. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/18 12:32 PM |
| 2 | Keanu Reeves was sued by a woman who suggested that he used hypnosis and impersonated her ex-husband to impregnate her. She sought $3 million in spousal support from the actor, and $150,000/month, retroactively, in child support. DNA test proved he was not the father and the suit was thrown out.Hahaha oh.... | /r/MensRights | 18/01/18 12:24 PM |
| 735 | Keanu Reeves was sued by a woman who suggested that he used hypnosis and impersonated her ex-husband to impregnate her. She sought $3 million in spousal support from the actor, and $150,000/month, retroactively, in child support. DNA test proved he was not the father and the suit was thrown out.They did a DNA test? Those misogynists. Don't they believe the victim?? | /r/MensRights | 17/01/18 02:22 PM |
| 2 | Tim Pool asks if a company in New York is required to ensure 50/50 gender hiring how can this be accomplished when that state officially recognizes 31 genders.A discussion I had with a former colleague about the number of genders led me to the point that all gender discussions are doing a binary spectrum. That is, there are feminine and masculine traits and other genders are just different mixes of those binary traits. Even those who define themselves as nonbinary generally don't present a third unique set of traits. Sorta like with genitals, they can be male or female, or in rare cases, a mix of the two, but they are still on a binary spectrum (you d… | /r/MensRights | 16/01/18 05:29 PM |
| 2 | Tim Pool asks if a company in New York is required to ensure 50/50 gender hiring how can this be accomplished when that state officially recognizes 31 genders.At what point do you stop cataloging genders and start cataloging personalities? Can't you be a man with some feminine interests without inventing a whole new "gender" to describe it? | /r/MensRights | 16/01/18 03:50 PM |
| 1 | The Humiliation of Aziz Ansari. Allegations against the comedian are proof that women are angry, temporarily powerful—and very, very dangerous.I'd love to blame a victim, just can't find one in this story. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/18 01:52 PM |
| 2 | The Humiliation of Aziz Ansari. Allegations against the comedian are proof that women are angry, temporarily powerful—and very, very dangerous.Actually, it kinda is! That's the horrifying part | /r/MensRights | 16/01/18 01:34 PM |
| 0 | Is this the best way to refute a pro-circumcision argument?I have no problem with consensual tooth pulling, it would be wrong to do to infants. If there's a tooth problem, they absolutely do it with as much consent as they need for circumcision. (Parental) I don't think cosmetic surgery should be performed on children. So if a child was in an accident or has a birth defect, they shouldn't have any avenue to correct it? Or do you think it can be done based on consent of the parent along with the judgement of a qualified medical profession (same condition… | /r/MensRights | 16/01/18 06:16 AM |
| -1 | Circumcision Myths (from the Foregen website)Lol see the other thread of comments to see the reply to that study. Nice copying and pasting the conclusion from the abstract though! Makes it look like you understood the study. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/18 06:01 AM |
| 1 | Is this the best way to refute a pro-circumcision argument?You can cut toe webbing of an infant. There's not a justified need for that either. You actually aren't required to show a clear need to justify a medical procedure: you do have to show harm. (To be exact: you have to show risk/benefit but that might be a lil complicated for ya). If a daughter had a cosmetic birth defect, they could do cosmetic surgery (or if there was trauma). Either way, your understanding of "you have to prove there's a need" is not how it works in the US. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/18 06:00 AM |
| -1 | Circumcision Myths (from the Foregen website)Finally you cite Dr. Van Howe. Thought you would google his 10-year old paper a few replies ago. Oh well... In case you didn't know, he's a guy with an axe to grind for circumcision. So naturally, he would use a fairly subjective method in a non-blinded test. What is more scientific than a bias guy using a squishy metric unblinded? Nothing, as long as he supports your argument! But even then, this paper has its flaws. And oh, BTW, there are several other papers using the same methods finding no … | /r/MensRights | 16/01/18 05:53 AM |
| 1 | Is this the best way to refute a pro-circumcision argument?incision is at least assault surely Lol what? Incision as part of a medical procedure is never considered assault. Ever lol. Why do you people keep making stuff up? You think circumcision goes beyond the founding father's intention? You know circumcision was around then right?? | /r/MensRights | 15/01/18 05:19 PM |
| 0 | Circumcision Myths (from the Foregen website)So is the loss of foreskin... What stats would you like to make up this time? How is being circumcised make a man's life harder? Makes sex less pleasurable (something not defended by any sensible research or demonstrated in the medical community)? | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 11:12 PM |
| 0 | Circumcision Myths (from the Foregen website)Spend some time in medical school or biology. You'll learn that tissues undergo, especially genitals, huge changes between infancy and puberty, especially regarding sensitivity pleasure etc. lol It's not sensible to compare adult circumcision and childhood circumcision. Restoration of foreskin is...well that's hilarious that's where you went. It's well known to have poor results and high costs... It's not even recommended by NORM! It's not even "true" foreskin being restored. I'm great with havi… | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 11:07 PM |
| 1 | Is this the best way to refute a pro-circumcision argument?Circumcision is morally abhorrent Why? You said earlier that "healthy, normal, functional body part" [read tissue since body part doesn't fit well with medical terminology], yet here you say it's not a problem to sometimes (pulling teeth, ear piercing infants, cosmetic surgery in children (which is absolutely done), toe webbing). That's inconsistent. Like I said, it's apparent you have a problem with circumcision but you haven't given much thought as to why it is not ok but other medical procedu… | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 10:58 PM |
| 1 | Circumcision Myths (from the Foregen website)But adult circumcision is different from postnatal circumcision (genitals change a lot pre and post puberty), so I'm not sure how comparable the two are. would have been a more enjoyable experience for both them and their partner. What is the evidence supporting this statement? | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 10:43 AM |
| 1 | Circumcision Myths (from the Foregen website)Your twisting my standard: I asked for poor outcomes resulting from a lack of foreskin. Colorblindness is a functional (measurable!) and pathological outcome, even if it isn't total blindness. | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 10:41 AM |
| 0 | Is this the best way to refute a pro-circumcision argument?My dispute isn't that circumcision is not the removal of healthy functional tissue. My dispute is that is a terrible standard since virtually every surgical procedure does that. You may as well say circumcision is wrong because it's surgery. You definitely (and perhaps purposely) misunderstood the point. The point was the ethical standard was "destruction of healthy functional tissue is considered harmful" and I provided several examples that all fit those terms but are not considered unethical.… | /r/MensRights | 14/01/18 10:35 AM |
| 2 | Proof radical feminists hate "innocent until proven guilty."No problem my man. Very surprised/glad to see a kind reply. +1 faith in humanity! | /r/MensRights | 13/01/18 10:55 PM |
| 0 | Is this the best way to refute a pro-circumcision argument?Lol Don't... don't brush that off like it was a pedantic point. You purposely chose a very extreme inappropriate term to describe circumcision. You want to know how to refute pro-circumcision? Know what it is and how to properly describe instead of using hyperbolic terms. It makes you sound very unreasonable. Destruction of healthy tissue is done all the time without being considered harmful. Technically, haircuts and shaving could fit into that definition, although you could use a more explicit… | /r/MensRights | 13/01/18 10:52 PM |
| -1 | Is this the best way to refute a pro-circumcision argument?Amputation: surgical removal of a limb. Foreskin isn't a limb silly bear. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/18 06:53 AM |
| 1 | Very good explanation on the Apex Fallacy that many feminists don't seem to understandHe's saying that 70% of women have historically gone on to reproduce. In contrast, only 30% of men historically have been able to pass on their genes. That's unbelievable. As in, I literally do not believe it. Where the hell did that stat come from? | /r/MensRights | 13/01/18 05:33 AM |
| 1 | Proof radical feminists hate "innocent until proven guilty."In what context [is this recognized by the UN as a basic human right] Universal Declaration of Human Rights and later adopted into the International Bill of Human Rights, which is sometimes considered customary international law. You're kinda hung up on on civil vs criminal which shows you may be a bit confused as to what presumption of innocence is (and perhaps rights in general). You aren't granted rights in certain legal contexts: the idea is you possess rights simply by existing. You don't j… | /r/MensRights | 13/01/18 05:19 AM |
| 1 | Slander: Character Assassination of James Damore. How the media is crucifying a man who committed the crime of thinking while white male.Two wiki articles on topics I've published on. Thanks for addressing my concerns | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 09:15 PM |
| -1 | Circumcision Myths (from the Foregen website)I think ethical points are worth discussing, but the biological function argument is what never rings true. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 08:46 PM |
| 1 | See Jane Go, the sexist Uber competitor, will be ceasing operations soon due to a lack of fundingYou would be my favorite person if you had a legit source | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 08:17 PM |
| 1 | 'A hatred of men and sexuality': 100 French women led by actress Deneuve slam post-Weinstein witch-huntWait is she untouchable or did she make herself available to all powerful men so now she is allied to them against her best interest? Those seem exclusive. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 08:10 PM |
| 1 | 'A hatred of men and sexuality': 100 French women led by actress Deneuve slam post-Weinstein witch-huntWait is she untouchable or did she make herself available to all powerful men so now she is allied to them against her best interest? Those seem exclusive. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 08:10 PM |
| -1 | Circumcision Myths (from the Foregen website)Wait wouldn't people without foreskins be more sensitive to foreskin functions? If you didn't have teeth, you'd definitely notice how much more difficult eating is. This is the part that never rings true for me in this issue: all the supposed foreskin functions occur just fine in circumcized males. I find my copulation has plenty of lube and pleasure thank you very much. Do most circumcized men have trouble with friction and I've just been lucky?? I haven't found any real evidence of poor outcom… | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 08:01 PM |
| 0 | My mother said she can't leave her house at 1am because she is a woman.Well I have been raped as a teen so STFU you don't speak for me. Both are atrocious but at least as a rape victim you can recover and try to move on. Your friends and family don't have to be heavily affected. You can't recover from dead. You also have the option of killing yourself if you prefer but with murder you don't get an option. Safe your sophmoric hyperbolic pity. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 07:17 PM |
| 1 | Slander: Character Assassination of James Damore. How the media is crucifying a man who committed the crime of thinking while white male.anyone with even a small amount of scientific training can see it And anyone with the smallest amount of hiring experience can tell you not to expect equal applications from men and women. And that underlines the whole flaw with equal hiring. Why do you think you need any amount of scientific training for this anyways? I've been a scientist for quite some time and have no idea how my training would fit into understanding this memo more than a lay person. You aren't trying to use some college cla… | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 07:12 PM |
| 1 | Proof radical feminists hate "innocent until proven guilty."Umm presumption of innocence extends beyond criminal trials. It's also part of journalistic codes and civil processes, and recognized by the UN as a basic human right. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 06:30 PM |
| -1 | Is this the best way to refute a pro-circumcision argument?Not sure if you're American or not, but in the US you can do any sort of religious expression with your children so long as it doesn't induce mental or physical harm. The onus isn't about religion but in demonstrating male circumcision causes harm. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 06:19 PM |
| -1 | Is this the best way to refute a pro-circumcision argument?Simply because it isn't required of the religion doesn't mean it can't have religious signifacance. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 06:14 PM |
| 1 | New public transportation safety campaign : men are expected to put themselves at risk for womenJust more men on men violence that women have nothing to do with, right? | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 05:45 PM |
| 3 | Very good explanation on the Apex Fallacy that many feminists don't seem to understandBecause people who make a career in women's studies need a problem to point towards | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 04:45 PM |
| 3 | Foreskin Is The Active Ingredient In Oprah's Favorite Skin CreamOooh non-healthcare. My bad. I was really confused... | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 03:57 PM |
| 2 | Foreskin Is The Active Ingredient In Oprah's Favorite Skin CreamHmm couple points. They are cultivating primary tissue to extract growth factors from the foreskin. I don't think there's any in vitro cell lines being used. (It would be more work than it's worth). I assume they use foreskin since it's relatively rich with such factors and if readily available tissue (usually thrown away). Having said that, I really doubt it does anything. Another minor point is that immortalized cell lines aren't technically cancer per se. Cancer is an in vivo condition. Histo… | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 03:56 PM |
| 3 | Very good explanation on the Apex Fallacy that many feminists don't seem to understandAlmost all women are mothers? And what do you mean "30% of men genes remain?" These stats sound misinterpreted. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 03:12 PM |
| 8 | Very good explanation on the Apex Fallacy that many feminists don't seem to understandHas more power than you or I will ever have. Still oppressed because she lacks a y chromosome. You're still privelaged. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 03:06 PM |
| 1 | Foreskin Is The Active Ingredient In Oprah's Favorite Skin CreamIsn't that what you asked for? | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 02:55 PM |
| 0 | Foreskin Is The Active Ingredient In Oprah's Favorite Skin CreamYou've... Never heard of a blood transfusion?? | /r/MensRights | 12/01/18 02:40 PM |
| 1 | "maybe u got a guilty conscience"Why do you care what a five year old thinks? Sounds like she just needs still quiet time. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/18 04:44 PM |
| 34 | Publicly, We Say #MeToo. Privately, We Have Misgivings. | Even feminists are getting sick of feminism now.Did you notice how the concerns mean nothing until a feminist brings them up? And then she writes like it's some special insight just her and her friends came up with... | /r/MensRights | 05/01/18 09:35 PM |
| 30 | Look at this garbage. Hey, Genius, there's a problem in society, it's called False Rape Accusation. I wish that I could switch the genders of feminists for a month, so that they could experience what men have to face."Remember women: don't talk to unapproved men. Their ideas are dangerous. And they probably smell." - a person who draws comics | /r/MensRights | 05/01/18 04:55 PM |
| 13 | 2018 Will Be the Year Feminists Target Little BoysThe bot changes the word boys to Jews and girls to Aryan. A buzz feed comic was called get lost boys (changed to get lost Jews by the bot). Your outrage over the phrase get lost Jews is precisely the point of the bot. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/18 07:59 PM |
| 2 | Study finds robust sex differences in children's toy preferences across a range of ages and countriesIt informs how gender may influence behavior even before puberty | /r/MensRights | 02/01/18 05:24 PM |
| 2 | Hormone based contraceptive gel for men about to go on trial - blocks testosteroneLast I checked, gel blockers have had mixed results and it's unclear how long they are effective. I wouldn't hold my breath for anything just going into early human testing, but FYI we already prescribe drugs that effectively mess with hormone levels (androgen depletion or supplementation). It hasn't been done for bc yet but I don't think the fact it alters local t production automatically disqualifies it | /r/MensRights | 20/12/17 05:14 PM |
| 1 | How do you respond to feminists when they try to prove male sexual privilege with statistics?How does men raping women more often than women raping men evidence of sexual privelage (the quantity of the difference if questionable based on definitions and where you get the stats)? Very few men are rapists so it's hard to pretend it affects most relationships. Most sex is overwhelming consensual and generally gated by female interest, especially in 30+ age groups (several studies quantify various aspects of that, as do 90s comedians). | /r/MensRights | 20/12/17 03:09 PM |
| 2 | But I was 24 and he was one the most powerful men in show business.It's not terribly far fetched I think. He said he would resign to get the heat off of him during the AL election but if no one cares, he's going to stay on. | /r/MensRights | 20/12/17 06:51 AM |
| 1 | But I was 24 and he was one the most powerful men in show business.He is still a senator. He said he would step down some day that isn't determined so I think his gesture has even less meaning | /r/MensRights | 19/12/17 09:01 PM |
| 1 | But I was 24 and he was one the most powerful men in show business.you're definition is objectively wrong. Just because you found it in the dictionary doesn't mean that's how it's defined. Paraphrased so you're to sentences make sense together. Sure facts in books can be wrong, but I used a definition (including the FBI definition of criminal rape) which actually do define reality in a legal framework (and also objectively tells you what words mean). You can define rape as power dynamics (still waiting for the legal system that fits your definition)if you like … | /r/MensRights | 19/12/17 07:04 PM |
| 2 | UK: Innocent student wrongly accused of rape calls for anonymity for sex assault defendants until they are found guilty.You don't have to censor the press to make this work. You have put the police and all parties on a gag order for ongoing investigations (not uncommon for high profile investigations). You're censoring the parties involved instead of the media. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/17 09:02 PM |
| 5 | Teen girl who lied about rape faces 32 years in prisonYou don't want to read 13 reasons why she deserves felony charges #12 will be your mind? | /r/MensRights | 18/12/17 02:21 PM |
| 1 | But I was 24 and he was one the most powerful men in show business."the age at which a person's consent to sexual intercourse is valid in law." -Definition of age of consent. "Similarly, a victim may be legally incapable of consent because of age." from FBI legal definition of rape. It's actually pretty clear they can't in a legal sense. You can disagree all you like, but I didn't make up the definitions lol. two 16 year olds consenting to sex is legally treated very differentl6 than when one 16 year old rapes another. I assume by rape you mean using force, thr… | /r/MensRights | 18/12/17 06:47 AM |
| 1 | But I was 24 and he was one the most powerful men in show business.They legally cannot consent to sex. That's literally the meaning of age of consent. It's not criminal when teens have sex with each other because there's no victim (i.e. who do you prosecute when neither could consent?) But there is no legal framework to say that teenagers can give consent to sex. Power is irrelevant. Even if a teenager could conceivably have power over an adult (rich brat over help, employee) it's still statutory rape on the unempowered adult because the teen cannot consent. It… | /r/MensRights | 15/12/17 08:21 PM |
| 1 | But I was 24 and he was one the most powerful men in show business.The good news is most women, even feminists, don't agree with that in my xp | /r/MensRights | 15/12/17 04:23 PM |
| 1 | But I was 24 and he was one the most powerful men in show business.Hurray! | /r/MensRights | 15/12/17 04:20 PM |
| 7 | But I was 24 and he was one the most powerful men in show business.Why do we have an age of content? It is because age is used as a proxy for power. Your premise is flawed. We use age as a proxy for maturity (ability to make decisions you fully understand). You can't legally consent to anything if you're unable to understand the agreement. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/17 04:12 PM |
| 4 | "Men aren't overwhelming casualty of war.....because 25% of civilian deaths in syria are women and children" this is the mentality that is responsible for men being so disposable and it's sad that it's shared by so many.Sorry, you said men tend to support and take part in war and therefore women and children are the primary victims. That claim only makes sense if you're implying men can't be victims because they are responsible for it. Maybe you're implying something else? Once again, men (or women) don't vote for any kind of spending. That's factually not how taxpayer money is spent, which basically means your stat is made up (I can explain a third time if it helps). Men leaning (very marginally) conservative … | /r/MensRights | 14/12/17 08:06 PM |
| 5 | "Men aren't overwhelming casualty of war.....because 25% of civilian deaths in syria are women and children" this is the mentality that is responsible for men being so disposable and it's sad that it's shared by so many.It is true that men love going to war. That's why they are legally required to sign up for the draft? In all seriousness, vote for military spending? Civilians and soldiers don't vote for spending so how is that stat generated (and being applied)? | /r/MensRights | 14/12/17 07:33 PM |
| 1 | #MeToo - Guy at office makes sign asking women to stay 300ft away from him. He has bills and would like to keep his job.Women... Have told you to stay back because they don't want to get raped...? | /r/MensRights | 13/12/17 06:34 PM |
| 2 | [Retrospective] Feminist Julie Burchill said it was "nice" that more boys commit suicide than girls. 15 years later, her son killed himself.Are we reading the same comments? | /r/MensRights | 13/12/17 05:11 PM |
| 6 | [Retrospective] Feminist Julie Burchill said it was "nice" that more boys commit suicide than girls. 15 years later, her son killed himself.The real irony is she still won't realize | /r/MensRights | 13/12/17 05:10 PM |
| 6 | [Retrospective] Feminist Julie Burchill said it was "nice" that more boys commit suicide than girls. 15 years later, her son killed himself.Cognitive dissonance is an important feature of someone with her mentality | /r/MensRights | 13/12/17 05:09 PM |
| 5 | [Retrospective] Feminist Julie Burchill said it was "nice" that more boys commit suicide than girls. 15 years later, her son killed himself.I mean yeah. That's why men are the real victims of breast cancer and death from child birth. /s I get that you're devil's advocate, it's just unfortunate it's such an indefensible statement that many accepted outtight because it claimed women were victims. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/17 05:08 PM |
| 3 | What do you think of the idea of rape culture?For starters, don't be concerned about what other sources say instead of interpreting data. What a respectable (lol) social worker (I assume she means sociologist since social worker is... Something else) believes is irrelevant (relying on such is groupthink). The facts to back up the opinion are what matters. Turn the argument that direction and go from there. Hard facts are not in their side. It helps to define terms specifically (what does she mean by rape culture existing?). Sometimes when p… | /r/MensRights | 11/12/17 10:22 PM |
| 1 | If a young female waitress wears a low-cut top to show off her breasts, a short skirt and red lipstick to imitate sexually aroused labia; is she sexually harassing me?I would stick with the clevage and short skirt. I have a hard time pretending women put on red lipstick saying "oh yeah, he is gonna think about my labia." Although I now find black lipstick disturbing if that is their thinking... | /r/MensRights | 11/12/17 09:20 PM |
| 1 | The naked hard truth about feminist "logic"To give you another mra perspective, I think feminism can and has some some good for society. But it has to be acknowledged it isn't designed nor does it have incentive to deal with inequalities the favor women (or else the draft would be required for women decades ago). I've worked with a lot of feminists in my line of work (extreme in some cases) and one of the oddest habits if to try to redefine patriarchy. Every feminist I've spoken with believe patriarchy is clearly defined but they all hav… | /r/MensRights | 11/12/17 05:13 PM |
| 36 | If a young female waitress wears a low-cut top to show off her breasts, a short skirt and red lipstick to imitate sexually aroused labia; is she sexually harassing me?It's like abusing power is a human trait instead of gender trait. Weeeeeeeiiiiiiirrrrrdddddd | /r/MensRights | 11/12/17 03:26 PM |
| 4 | Everyone likes to argue that sexism against men does not exist. I'm a woman and even I know that's not true, considering people say stuff like this.It's so filled with obvious idiocy I can't manufacture outrage. It's more funny than offensive, like a two year old swearing. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/17 03:24 PM |
| 1 | Saw a post on my facebook feed that said "Doesn't the way men respond to the word feminism show how much we need it?" and I decided to enlighten some people (end in comments)I honestly don't like bringing up family court things because I think things that have to do with death evoke much stronger emotions With all due respect, this shows you're not thinking like a feminist. Feminism isn't worried about life and death, it is about oppression. The suicide rate, homelessness etc. are hard to make relevant to the issue (in their minds) because it isn't about females or society inflicting those on men. Family court caters to that mentality. I find it resonates more than … | /r/MensRights | 08/12/17 11:04 PM |
| 1 | Saw a post on my facebook feed that said "Doesn't the way men respond to the word feminism show how much we need it?" and I decided to enlighten some people (end in comments)Bit of advice: 1) draft is not persuasive when it hasn't been in effect for decades. I wouldn't dwell on it. 2) use family court. Fathers are limited on seeing their children and are generally compelled to pay the ex-wife. This is both widely known and systemically sexist. Ex wives can (and do) even move across the country to forbid a father from seeing children. There is no legal recourse. This is incompatible with the idea of a patriarchy. 3) as others pointed out, don't hesitate to call out s… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/17 07:53 PM |
| 3 | Sick of American FeministsOne thing I try to keep in mind is that political narrative doesn't reflect individual attitudes. Most black people don't have a problem with most white people, most men don't hate women etc. News generate revenue from telling you problems exist so it's always going to say there are problems. Most women do not want every man fired and as extreme feminists tip their hand to show that what they want, support will falter and things will moderate. They don't actually represent the end game like they… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/17 07:29 PM |
| 2 | My school is sexistI don't think anything you stuff would hold any legal weight at least. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/17 03:19 PM |
| 2 | My school is sexistI suspect few have tried it because they realize what we kinda know: it wasn't written to protect men. Frankly it off in our best interest to have a slam dunk case go through first so it can set a precedent for applying to men. I don't think a judge would say it only applies to women, but they can say "I don't think it applies to this case." | /r/MensRights | 08/12/17 03:17 PM |
| 1 | Three Methods of Male Birth That Can Help Prevent Pregnancy ( Legalize Male Birth Control )Male bc is tricky (aside from physical barriers like condoms) since unlike females, our bodies don't go into a temporary infertile period. It's not like there's easy bc that is made illegal to just screw men | /r/MensRights | 08/12/17 03:04 PM |
| 2 | My school is sexistWere there police present when they questioned you? Were your parents present? In the US, they can't question a minor without parental supervision. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/17 02:54 PM |
| 2 | My school is sexistWhile you have every reason to think that would apply, no court is going to support it. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/17 02:52 PM |
| 3 | Meryl Streep, other actresses to demand '50/50 by 2020' equal representation for women. She does not understand that profit and money make the decision not actresses throwing toys out of the pram.That's one way to make porn stars stop claiming to be actresses. They would never want equal salary with men. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/17 02:49 PM |
| 1 | A room full of women support lying about birth control and getting pregnant the slide. But let's not generalize.When you get married, you don't sign a contract on how many kids to have... People are allowed to change their minds about the number (especially after having one, you may realize it's not what you thought it would be). Forcing someone into parenthood in this age of accessible bc it's wrong. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/17 02:35 PM |
| 3 | Because feminists never "guilt" men. The hypocrisy...As a gay dude I have no desire to dominate women at all. lol | /r/MensRights | 07/12/17 05:45 AM |
| 1 | Because feminists never "guilt" men. The hypocrisy...Oh definitely. I guess my point was the ease of detection in men doesn't necessarily lead to better clinical outcomes. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/17 05:38 AM |
| 1 | Because feminists never "guilt" men. The hypocrisy...To be clear, I meant it's only clearly cherry picking if it's outside Australia. The idea is if you select a stat to fit the narrative, it's cherry picking no matter where you live though :D. The problem with global stats in these sorts of matters is that categorization isn't harmonized in every country (that is to say, the practices for diagnosing and ascribing each cancer to a death isn't the same from country to country, city to city etc.). In theory global stats would be fair more useful (bi… | /r/MensRights | 07/12/17 05:34 AM |
| 2 | Because feminists never "guilt" men. The hypocrisy...Last I checked though, men tend to get diagnosed later since it is so rare (usually written off as male breast development) | /r/MensRights | 06/12/17 04:30 PM |
| 1 | Because feminists never "guilt" men. The hypocrisy...True, but it's fairly dishonest to treat breast cancer like it's not gender specific | /r/MensRights | 06/12/17 04:25 PM |
| 2 | Because feminists never "guilt" men. The hypocrisy...A) absolutely true, but they aren't very different from worldwide stats (qualitatively speaking). There are some thoughtful reasons to use us or eu data over worldwide but they say the same thing in this case. B) over time? How would that change anything? Is prostate cancer expected to be that much more prevalent or bc that much more curable? I kinda doubt it's going to change much anytime soon. It's curious why Australia is different in this case (bc seems way lower). Either way it isn't very r… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/17 04:22 PM |
| 20 | Because feminists never "guilt" men. The hypocrisy...Does it bother anyone else that a quick Google search shows the original fact is false? (40k deaths from breast cancer and 26k from prostate). | /r/MensRights | 06/12/17 01:49 PM |
| 14 | What does it mean to be an MRA these days?I think one big point that sometimes is forgotten is that men's rights and women's rights are not mutually exclusive. The climate is very antagonistic and hyperbolic and so focusing on core issues is a great way to get people to see your point. I tend to focus men's rights on I think two obvious points. 1) it's important to ensure accused men have due process, one of the earliest and most fundamental rights. This sort of phrasing is really hard to attack since well it's true and literally about … | /r/MensRights | 04/12/17 09:18 PM |
| 8 | The New York Times: The Men Who Cost Clinton the ElectionDidn't you hear? That's because their husbands told them to and they didn't want to disappoint their male masters. (Real explanation of forth by someone who has no idea what human relationships are like in this country) | /r/MensRights | 04/12/17 08:13 PM |
| 2 | Watch me get banned from /r/sex for calling circumcision MGM.I guess my point is more in this context: we agree that mutilate implies a level of severity. You say listing a body part meets the severity, but then define body part as a distinct section (i.e a definition that doesn't include severity). I think the bottom line is circumcision just isn't severe enough for most people to think of it as mutilation. You can try to involve a softer definition, ignore how the word is commonly used etc. But that's kind of the Crux of the matter isn't it? In the end,… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/17 02:53 PM |
| 1 | Watch me get banned from /r/sex for calling circumcision MGM.To be fair, elaborate was also misspelled. It may have been an honest mistake representing your ideas. I'm glad you can recognize when you're outmatched. Next time, you should tell people your arguments were elaborate and reasonable so they know. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/17 02:42 PM |
| 2 | Watch me get banned from /r/sex for calling circumcision MGM.I think almost any native English speaker would say mutilate refers to severe injuries. I don't think foreskin is considered a body part (tissue is the appropriate term) nor do most people consider circumcision removal of a body part. That's probably why circumcision is not usually considered mutilation. I'm assuming you'll try to invoke the literal definition of body part as any part of the body, but then we're back to severity. Instead of going that direction, why don't you want to call it tis… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/17 02:29 PM |
| 1 | Watch me get banned from /r/sex for calling circumcision MGM."or disfigured." One could argue it fits that criteria if they believe changing from default is disfigurement. My bigger point though is you're (intentionally) using a very loose definition of mutilate. A scar is also a permanent damage, but no one would say I mutilated my finger or cheek from my 1mm scars. I also think you're intentionally missing my second point that you are purposely using the word mutilate for its negative connotation and then bemoaning people for interpreting it as such. Ho… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/17 02:09 PM |
| 2 | Watch me get banned from /r/sex for calling circumcision MGM.But let's face it, calling circumcision mutilation is purely done for the negative connotation. You can't use the term for its negative association and then pretend people are being unreasonable by their negative reaction. Circumcision is a neutral word already. Also using your definition, would cutting fingernails be finger mutilation? Nothing about pain in your definition :) | /r/MensRights | 04/12/17 01:42 PM |
| 10 | Good or bad ideaFalse accusations are tough to prove. Being found not guilty is not proof she lied | /r/MensRights | 04/12/17 01:05 PM |
| 245 | Apparently to Vice news talking about men’s rights is comparable to white supremacy and the Nazi’sWhen you think of Nazis you always think of fatherhood rights and demanding proof of accusations. It's a natural comparison. /s | /r/MensRights | 01/12/17 02:36 PM |
| 1 | Tucker Carlson Vs Third-Way Feminist On Women Still Fighting For Rights1) Giles Corey was a man killed in Salem witch trials. (Technically never tried because he died refusing to give a plea). 2) it's called a Witch Hunt because the crime is witchcraft which can apply to either gender (see Giles corey) 3) witch Hunt is not exclusively men imprisoning women, it's not reflective of gender at all. In fact, young women were there instigators. 4) time for men to feel what women feel? At what point in u.s. history has women ever been jailed with higher frequency than men… | /r/MensRights | 30/11/17 04:03 PM |
| 3 | How to respond to the "we're not blaming men, we're blaming patriarchy" lineHave the person define patriarchy (use questions to drill all the details you need) and then hold them to their definition. This is actually a very good debate tactic with topics that can be vague (like patriarchy). I find either people will use such a soft definition that their stance is agreeable or such a ridiculous definition that you've basically made them clarify their insanity | /r/MensRights | 30/11/17 01:27 PM |
| 0 | How to respond to the "we're not blaming men, we're blaming patriarchy" lineThis guy here gets it. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/17 01:19 PM |
| 5 | Innocent men are innocentOr went to middle school | /r/MensRights | 24/11/17 09:25 PM |
| 4 | Innocent men are innocentWell they have body as feminine so I'm guessing we are more of a disembodied undead, like a ghost | /r/MensRights | 24/11/17 09:24 PM |
| 3 | Electrician claims sexual harassment and assault are rife in the industry.I think the bigger thing is it's really hard to prove it ever happened (same issue women deal with). We can't expect a legal system to dole punishments without evidence. | /r/MensRights | 22/11/17 05:21 PM |
| 17 | Electrician claims sexual harassment and assault are rife in the industry.And best of all, if they claimed you came onto them, I'm sure it would be equally shrugged off by your employer right?? | /r/MensRights | 22/11/17 05:15 PM |
| 3 | “Not concerned “about innocent men being falsely accused.I think she wanted the attention. The whole draw of activism is to get as much attention as possible. She wanted an opportunity to talk to her critics so she could get her message out. The worst thing for an activist is to yell a message no one hears. | /r/MensRights | 22/11/17 03:21 PM |
| 3 | How is demonizing men at all an effective strategy for your cause?How else would you know they are very smart? Certainly not from the content | /r/MensRights | 21/11/17 09:56 PM |
| 18 | IncredibleThe tweet is thoughtless, self-absorbed and all, but are we not going to talk about how she used whom instead of who? It bothers me almost as much. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/17 06:17 PM |
| 1 | I've never understood this sort of thinking. Whataboutisms are a plague on modern society."And then the enlightened man was rewarded for his wisdom with sex, the one thing all men want (and it's disgusting)." - feminist fairy tales. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/17 06:11 PM |
| 1 | being a “hoe” doesn’t get you 20+ years in prison.What people believe is somewhat irrelevant, it matters what you can prove. I can believe someone is capable of murder but without evidence I'm not going to convict. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/17 05:52 PM |
| 3 | You try and do one nice thing and someone has to come along and throw in the “male privilege” cardThey can't live in an echo chamber if you disrupt it | /r/MensRights | 20/11/17 06:27 PM |
| 2 | Google doodle artwork for International Mens Day, 2017You're not going to see citations. When people accuse of sexism, they firmly believe it is self-evident. And why wouldn't they think that? Someone of authority told them sexism is everywhere and they never asked for evidence... | /r/MensRights | 20/11/17 06:21 PM |
| 4 | A unknown joke.If you can feed the professor's ego, you'll be good about 90% of the time! | /r/MensRights | 20/11/17 06:17 PM |
| 16 | A unknown joke.As someone who was on track to be a professor, retaliation is illegal but nearly impossible to prove. School is going to back up professors without substantial proof so it's an extreme way to go that gets you no where. Generally it's not worth the fight. It sucks but it's reality. | /r/MensRights | 20/11/17 06:16 PM |
| 3 | Will feminists bring us full circle back into sex segregation?I think before that point, feminism will ruin it's own name. But if you want to foster hatred you have to segregate so your followers will believe you when you say how horrible the others are. | /r/MensRights | 20/11/17 06:10 PM |
| 1 | Will feminists bring us full circle back into sex segregation?But in the case of the Titanic they WOULD simply die. You know, like all those guys who didn't dress like women did | /r/MensRights | 20/11/17 06:06 PM |
| 3 | A unknown joke.Frankly, I'd just let it go. That's your best option. If it gets bad you can take it higher and say that you want to be less offensive but they aren't helping you out by passing on the information but all that will do is get the professor to look bad and have it out for you | /r/MensRights | 20/11/17 06:03 PM |
| 2 | Google doodle artwork for International Mens Day, 2017Not perfect for men... Lower life expectancy, reducing defense against false rape accusations, higher suicide rate, family court blatantly skewed, just minor imperfections. But hey women, are more likely to be catcalled so... | /r/MensRights | 20/11/17 05:39 PM |
| 1 | After browsing this subreddit for a while, I've decided on my stance on Men's Rights.As they like to say "when you're used to privelage, equality feels like oppression" | /r/MensRights | 16/11/17 09:30 PM |
| 3 | Misandry is not hate, somehowExcellent. This is why you rule the storks (with a patriarchal regime) | /r/MensRights | 16/11/17 09:25 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter