| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | "Anti-rape campaign"... all Men Evidently are Potential RapistsPeople are responsible for their actions while impaired. If I can be guilty of drunk driving (or rape!) while I'm drunk, then someone equally drunk is entirely capable of making their own decision about whether or not they consent to sex. I'm sure I'm not the only man who's had a too-drunk-to-speak-clearly woman pawing him. I've been sober enough to push them off, and I've also been drunk enough to paw right back. I'm sure I'm also not the only guy who's ended up going to bed with someone while … | /r/MensRights | 10/08/10 12:27 AM |
| 5 | "Anti-rape campaign"... all Men Evidently are Potential RapistsThe ad said "drunk", not "unconscious". Theres a big difference between having active sex with a drunk woman and molesting someone who's passed out. The latter is clearly over the line, both legally and morally. The first is highly questionable, and yet men have gone to jail for it. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/10 01:11 PM |
| -3 | "Anti-rape campaign"... all Men Evidently are Potential RapistsWay more women are not raped than women are raped. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/10 01:10 PM |
| 1 | "Anti-rape campaign"... all Men Evidently are Potential RapistsI replied to you above, but re: the positive nature of the campaign. This is clearly not targeted at violent rapists - it wouldn't have any effect on them anyway. This is targeted at "date rape" - largely non violent, often not even especially coercive, with "aggressors" who wouldn't even realized that they had "raped" someone. What's wrong with good old "no means no"? This ad places the burden of testing their partners state and mood on the man - all men. It's not about the statistics of aggres… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/10 01:08 PM |
| 1 | "Anti-rape campaign"... all Men Evidently are Potential RapistsYou're correct. But you should go back and look at that ad - "She was drunk, so I backed off". Personally, I think we extend the "rape" label too far into "I made a poor decision" territory, but that's were it is right now. A man can be charged, tried, and convicted of rape if he has sex with a woman who is later considered 'too drunk' to consent. Even if he was equally drunk. I can't even imagine the reverse case coming to trial - can you? For the record - I am not defending violent rape here. … | /r/MensRights | 09/08/10 12:58 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter