TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

morven Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by morven on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The root of the problem, I agree, isn't racism; it's that in practice, police think the populace are the enemy and they're an occupying force. If it was purely about racism then no white people would be killed; in actuality more white people are killed by cops, though per capita the risks are greater if you are black, or mentally ill, or non English speaking, or male. So biases about dangerousness or lack thereof, plus other bigotries, play a big part in the chance of suffering police violence, …
/r/MensRights20/08/15 07:50 PM
2

All were small time, non-violent criminals at worst. We don't execute people for this. Or are you happy with the idea of a friend or family member being killed over something like this? I can bet you that you know people with a little criminal history.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 04:29 AM
4

Honestly a lot of the problem is that the movement tends to be maligned in the media; this, there are a lot of sources to support a negative article.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 02:08 AM
1

All her friends appear to agree that something happened to her at about that time that was very upsetting to her. That doesn't mean she was raped, even; poor judgment as to consensual sex might have been all it was. I know I've hated myself in the morning after some things I did at that age. Especially when drunk or high or similarly impaired in my judgement. I guess my point is that we don't have to assume malice or deliberate deception here. It may have been, but it isn't required for the stor…
/r/MensRights14/12/14 12:49 AM
1

Interesting that Jackie didn't know which frat; someone else told her which one. I think it's likely that something very upsetting happened to her, possibly rape, but no other details are at all trustworthy. And the thing is, we know that victims of traumatic events have very unreliable memories of what happened to them, and quite often end up making sense of them with wholly imaginary details. This case doesn't even require any malice on Jackie's part. Memory is that fucking bad. Which only mak…
/r/MensRights13/12/14 08:22 AM
17

Because Cosby's behavior, if these allegations are true, was not acceptable for me or many others. Abusers are repugnant people, and cases where others covered for an abuser because of their celebrity status are particularly disgusting. But I don't support prosecuting so long after the fact. Too long for good evidence.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:40 PM
3

Sounds like lack of evidence of both rape and false accusation to me.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 10:32 PM
1

I'd go for that.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 08:14 PM
2

Yeah, waste of a good name.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 06:15 PM
20

Ugh, a pox on both parties; it's a shame that the Democrats doing badly has to mean the Republicans did well. Both do badly. Both give ideologues too much power. Both are in the pockets of entrenched interests. Both are owned by Wall Street. Neither gives much of a shit.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 06:04 PM
2

But with a name like that he shoulda been a WW2 General.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 06:01 PM
4

I disagree that Zoe Quinn is a symbol of all that's wrong with gaming journalism -- she's a nobody, her game is a nothing, and TBH if it wasn't for this, nobody would have heard of her. The true issue with gaming journalism is that it's fucking owned, like a lot of the rest of the press, by the very companies it reports on. They that pay the bills get to dictate the content, and the game company advertisers pay the bills. Zoe Quinn is a sideshow. But if she cheated on her boyfriend, he has a rig…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 01:05 AM
47

What she did wasn't a crime in Canada. This probably was a big part of why Canada refused to extradite her, and I wholly agree with this decision (provided what I read, that the boy consented to the sex, was true). Canada's age of consent is 16, unless the older person is in a position of responsibility over the younger one (in which case it's 18). However, I would have my doubts that if the genders were reversed the decision would be the same.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 04:38 AM
3

I suspect wrez meant all the cases where this defense is believed, which are many.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 07:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter