TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

moteeye Archive

View 5 posts and 85 comments by moteeye on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well you certainly seem handicapped. But no, that wasn't what I was talking about.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 12:33 PM
0

I don't even believe in the word "onus", numb nuts.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 12:32 PM
0

Um. I see. Well you have also proven JACK SHIT.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 09:14 AM
1

Wow, what a cunt.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:13 AM
10

The judge is a white knight, as are 99% of judges, sorry to say.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:09 AM
-7

In the U.S. you are constitutionally guaranteed the right of assembly and protest... Sweet summer child lol. Welcome to the radical left.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 06:31 AM
1

Two upvotes. I count them: two.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 06:28 AM
3

Actually it proves that females MORE risk averse, but I hope you got sweaty palms! Truth is some of these guys are Darwin awards waiting to happen, yet some are those few can pull it off. It's interesting that acknowledging male risk is regarded as promoting male supremacy. A lot of these males die (there's a video online; wouldn't recommend watching it). There was a really interesting controversy in Israel when some academic claimed that ostentatious male risk was a mating strategy. It sort of …
/r/MensRights10/08/17 04:01 AM
4

Blue-collar workers die at a disproportionate rate on the job, and afterward, from job-related illnesses. But the harsh reality slips from our grasp, gets pushed aside as the cost of doing business, their difficult and dangerous labors taken for granted. This essay looks at some of the most compelling stories that got book-length treatment, and together, capture the full dimension of death on the job and the aftermath. They provide a blueprint of the issues involved in lost lives, fractured fami…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:42 AM
2

It was called "Psywar". I think it's available online.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:40 AM
1

Of course I'm going to have to repost: I had coffee with McCauley .........HALF AN HOUR AGO !!
/r/MensRights08/08/17 06:45 AM
4

Studies show that the global percentage of boys being denied access to education is equivalent to girls. Why to do we only focus on girls? That's a very good question.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 06:35 AM
3

Heat is arguably the most masculine movie ever made. I remember a feminist author writing in the "Vancouver Sun" about Heat. Even she couldn't resist, and praised the film's "machismo." Damn straight. Heat is a masterpiece. And it's great to see these men talking about the film.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 06:22 AM
3

And yet little boys dying was a matter of routine. And remains so.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 06:20 AM
6

Google has a program, pogrom?
/r/MensRights08/08/17 05:52 AM
1

Google dudebro You could be a professional writer! SKULLSPLITTER Ouch. That hurts. Seriously though create your own website.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 05:36 AM
1

But, as you can see, even I don't care enough to bother trying to look for it, haha. It's just one lie among many. Heh. Indeed. The lies are difficult to keep track of. Would be easier keeping track of those rare moments of truth.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 04:18 AM
1

fart in a hurricane pure poetry ;)
/r/MensRights08/08/17 04:17 AM
7

The last two minutes with Warren Farrell are especially interesting. He notes that if feminist theory were true, men would treat women like slaves. All women would be forced to give sex to men on command; women would be the ones that died young and did the dangerous jobs; we would have "men's studies" in universities rather than women's studies; we would have massive "male health care" initiatives and so forth. The opposite is true. Feminist theory will one day be recognized as an absurdity.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 04:14 AM
5

lol he's not a straight white male. What to do? commences singing Blame Patriarchyyyyy, blame patriarchyyyyy.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 04:04 AM
2

I said it before under a different user name but you really should create a blog. Your posts are too good to disappear down the Reddit rabbit hole.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 03:57 AM
0

That's interesting. However I would point out that "Stockholm Syndrome" is a real thing, especially among females.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 03:56 AM
78

I would be considered a "radical leftist" on a great many issues yet I found the manifesto completely reasonable. The gist of his argument is that there are certain trends or predilections between men and women, and that eg the relative lack of women in tech is not due to discrimination. That's it. That's what this "controversy" is about. His opinion is supported by the Israeli Kibbutz experiment and the Scandinavian countries; in both cases we see that the more choice women have, the less likel…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 03:53 AM
1

I was struggling to remember the name of Elizabeth Smart, thanks. It would be VERY interesting if someone performed a media study of these two cases and the amount of coverage they receive(d).
/r/MensRights08/08/17 03:32 AM
4

This is one of the most horrifying stories I've ever read. If not for the happy ending it would be suicide material. It's interesting that this gets little attention while stories about females held captive and raped go straight to the front page of the newspaper.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 03:05 AM
13

Marvelous post, you should email it to the author just for kicks.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:58 AM
1

Yes. That was my point.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:13 AM
4

Silly males, tricks are for females.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 09:54 PM
2

"Perhaps. I would argue that poor men die for rich men, not for women." Why one or the other? Poor men die for rich men and women both.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 09:25 PM
7

Nah, this is what happens when a post gets to r/all
/r/MensRights07/08/17 08:11 PM
24

What's your dysfunction?
/r/MensRights07/08/17 03:14 PM
90

Most feminists have the mental age of a 12 year old, and unfortunately they stay that way. The good news is that ruling elites love this women-chillen', as they are very easy to manipulate. So if you have a billion dollars or more -- congratulations! You're a feminist.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 02:02 PM
3

Grumpkin and snarks.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 11:50 AM
1

women were treated as things If women were treated as "things" then men were treated as less-than-things. There's no escaping it: men and boys made up the vast majority of unnatural deaths.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 11:24 AM
1

The Canadian government could have rescued him from Gitmo. That's the point which you ignore. That and the Geneva Conventions, signed by the Canadian government. Also the Canadian government under CSIS actually interrogated Khadr after the American shrinks and torture experts softened him up. Torture exists in defiance of the Geneva Conventions, and in fact several former CIA officers have spoken out against torture, pointing out that it doesn't work. There was a darkly humorous scene in Taranti…
/r/MensRights07/08/17 12:42 AM
1

Sorry I don't buy it. Men would not sacrifice their lives for what they considered property. That would be like a slave master sacrificing his life for a slave.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 10:47 PM
1

Whatever you do don't read the comments at Gizmodo. Basically a thousand screeching feminists.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 08:54 PM
1

The comment section reads like something out of Jezebel. A thousand feminist girls whining about "tech-bros" and "straight white males" and "dudebros" etc. etc. It's really bizarre. Has there ever been a society in history where the women just completely turned against their men like this? It's really ugly to watch. They seem to genuinely think they can just keep abusing men indefinitely. When the blowback comes it's going to be brutal, and the longer it takes the worse it will be.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 08:27 PM
11

Love that MRA's can laugh at themselves. If we ever become as stuffy and prudish as feminists we should disband immediately.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 12:04 AM
2

It's nice to see a growing number of women speaking out against this madness. Feminists act like men work and earn money with the goal of "oppressing" women when in fact it's the exact opposite: men work their assess off to support their families because they love them.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 11:38 PM
6

Not saying women had a walk in the park, far from it. They certainly suffered discrimination, like men. But the vast majority of men didn't have the right to vote either. Eg in colonial America even the majority of white men couldn't vote because they lacked the property requirements. There was actually a rebellion in Rhode Island to enfranchise Irish Americans. Americans were a little ahead of the curve compared to Europe, because after the civil war property requirements were removed, but poor…
/r/MensRights05/08/17 11:33 PM
16

...And also has the ironic effect of promoting male chauvinism. I mean let's be honest here. Feminists, especially the radical ones, are the very embodiment of negative female stereotypes: hysteria, histrionics, damselling, nagging, narcissism and solipsism, irrationality, and aversion to responsibility. There are plenty of actual strong women in the world but feminists actually undermine them with their embarrassing and juvenile and petty antics. They view the sexes as "at war" with one another…
/r/MensRights05/08/17 11:15 PM
1

A bot I actually like.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 11:06 PM
1

Redundant. I already said it was a year old in OP.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 10:51 PM
2

Would be very interested in hearing /u/girlwriteswhat 's take on this. Would love a video reply if she has time. Karen spoke recently in Australia and echoed the view that marriage was set up to ensure that women and children were taken care of. This certainly makes a lot more sense to me than the idea that men viewed women as "property". How many men here view their mothers as property? How many men here would fight and die to protect their big screen TV's? Or allow their most prized possession…
/r/MensRights05/08/17 09:15 PM
10

We don't know is the bottom line. I personally think the majority are probably false but that not all of them are malicious. Feminists have managed to convince quite a few impressionable young women that anything short of "affirmative consent" is rape. Then there are women who apparently don't understand the effects of alcohol and wake up thinking their drink has been spiked. Etc. Etc.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 08:35 PM
1

I honestly wouldn't be surprised if I learned some day that PETA was financed by the meat and dairy industries lol.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 07:20 PM
4

“The goal of our study was to examine how age of first exposure to pornography, and the nature of said first exposure, predicts conformity to two masculine norms: playboy — or sexually promiscuous behavior — It's called biology you fucking idiot. Men want to fuck. If it weren't the male sex drive you wouldn't be here. and seeking power over women,” Is that really a masculine norm? If a man really has power over a woman then why would he die for her? As is so often the case with men. Men seek pow…
/r/MensRights05/08/17 07:18 PM
60

lol. Feminists have no reason to exist except to whine and make everyone miserable. Even when people bend over backwards to please them they find something to whine about. They take the worst, most sexist and chauvinistic stereotypes about women and take them to an absurd extreme, promoting negative views about their own sex. Let this be yet another lesson for dumbass male feminists who don't realize what's going on: they hate you. If they had the power they would kill you. They despise you for …
/r/MensRights05/08/17 07:04 PM
10

It started at a point where full equality was practically achieved. It most certainly did not. Women have always been the privileged sex. By only focussing on the female side of the equation feminism has never moved us toward gender equality but only ever away from it. The situation is now so lopsided and out of whack that men have no choice but to go against their gender role (which feminists have shamelessly exploited -- the male gender role is to provide for and protect women and children) an…
/r/MensRights05/08/17 06:56 PM
2

Well even the BBC admitted that poor white males are now the most disadvantaged group in the UK. So you could use that as a source. An analogy might help as well: who has it worse -- a child born in Beyonce's house or a straight white male born in a trailer park with an abusive mother? A woman who works a comfy office job or a man who risks his life every day at work? Etc.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 06:13 PM
4

Well, I'm a leftist on economic issues. I guess you could call me a "classical leftist." The modern "left" is made up mostly of identitarians, meaning people who are obsessed with identity politics. The easiest way of countering SJW's is to point out their ridiculous hypocrisy on the issue of class. You don't have to believe in leftist solutions to argue that a white working class male is infinitely less "privileged" than a rich black woman. If these arguments come from a conservative they will …
/r/MensRights05/08/17 05:57 PM
3

Bitch stop talking about things of which you have no understanding. You understand masculinity about as well as I understand nuclear physics.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 05:23 PM
49

Ironically men can make a claim to historical oppression (meaning cruel or unjust treatment), if for no other reason than they were the ones forced to fight and die in wars (and the vast majority of civilian casualties). Today there is no contest about who is the privileged sex.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 05:19 PM
2

Casualty actor Tom Chambers is the perfect example of this storm in a feminist tea cup. ‘My wife works really hard as a stay-at-home mum, but I’m the only one bringing in a salary for our family,” he said in an interview with The Sun. ‘Many men’s salaries aren’t just for them, it’s for their wife and children, too.’ Now, there is no question that Tom was wrong. Whether he was quoted out of context, or his intentions were good, or he’s just plain ignorant, it was a bloody silly thing to say. I fu…
/r/MensRights05/08/17 05:16 PM
3

Feminism is highly lucrative. Think of how many domestic violence programs and charities and shelters there are globally, all feminist in nature. People love donating to causes that help women. If memory serves the people who the run the White Ribbon in Australia make about a hundred grand a year. And that's just domestic violence. Millions of dollars were spent on a "sexual violence awareness" program in one Canadian province last year. Once again it was feminist in nature, portraying women as …
/r/MensRights05/08/17 05:07 PM
74

"Men were not an historically oppressed group. Women were and are an oppressed group. The pay gap is a real problem, showing discrimination against women. Positive discrimination is used by governments around the world to redress historical injustice. We are proud of these young activists for fighting patriarchal oppression, and have given them grant money to pursue further projects. The straight white male who made the complaint is himself now under investigation for hate crimes against the sis…
/r/MensRights05/08/17 04:54 PM
12

Lol at the NPR hack's excuse: "She calls herself a survivor so we referred to her as such." To which a dude tweets: "I consider myself Napoleon, please refer to me as such." If "Napoleon" was a sexual identity he might actually have a case ;)
/r/MensRights05/08/17 04:49 PM
10

Great comment on the article by user Vulcans: The DV advocacy machine in Australia appears little more than a stage for practicing damseling. Most observers today, including feminist observers like Christina Hoff-Sommers, Camille Paglia, Rene Denfeld, Katie Roiphe and others agree that feminism comes close, if not all the way, to being a cult of victimhood. The phenomenon has variously been referred to as grievance feminism, victim feminism, safe space feminism, and even fainting-couch feminism …
/r/MensRights05/08/17 04:40 PM
337

It's about bloody time people started using the weapons of feminists against them. We tried the "ignore them" approach for a hundred years and things have gotten progressively worse. They WILL NOT STOP. They want to police how men sit, how they talk, how they urinate (I'm serious), how they make love, every aspect of a man's life. They are tyrants. Gender studies professors should be reported for hate speech. Feminist journalists should be condemned as bigots. Men should refuse to date self-iden…
/r/MensRights05/08/17 08:08 AM
1

Sorry to hear about your experiences, and yes what you say makes sense.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 04:00 AM
1

lol. It's not "one guy". It's every single anthropologist in the world. The "guy" in question simply has a theory about how hunter-gatherer bands maintain egalitarianism. The egalitarianism itself isn't actually disputed by anyone who knows what they're talking about -- which obviously doesn't include you. Bye.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 03:58 AM
3

In no way, shape, or form, is this the scientific consensus. Not only it is the scientific consensus, but not a single anthropologist disagrees that hunter-gatherer bands are egalitarian. There has literally never been a recorded example of the contrary. Note that these societies are completely different than the stationary horticultural societies or fishing villages that developed later on, which though fairly egalitarian contain some degree of hierarchy (due to food surplus). Note that I'm not…
/r/MensRights05/08/17 03:04 AM
3

No, we took into account war, and then did the numbers. Do you have a link? Specifically referring to war deaths in this context? You're talking about one book written in complete defiance of every piece of scientific research on this topic. Actually Boehm's views are shared by every respected anthropologist. The only dispute is over how hunter-gatherers maintain an egalitarian society. "The adult males in the society form a general coalition to prevent any one of their number, alone or with a f…
/r/MensRights05/08/17 02:50 AM
3

We did the math. Even with war, it comes out very skewed. You're missing the point. War is the reason it is skewed in the first place. Women like strong rich guys, deal with it. "Wealth" didn't exist until human beings developed stationary chiefdoms. For almost our entire history it didn't even exist as a concept. I agree that women are attracted to strength. They pursue rich men because they can. until there is a shortage. Hunter-gatherer bands are nomadic. There is no evidence of war prior to …
/r/MensRights05/08/17 02:08 AM
6

Alpha and beta are just categories that people loosley fall into They are based on female sexual selection. That means your outlook remains fundamentally gynocentric. Stereotypical alpha males are certainly not superior to stereotypical beta males. Some of the greatest men in history were unattractive to women. 20 percent of men get 80 percent of the women. This is backed up scientifically even in the modern era, as well as historically by looking at genetics. These statistics are fundamentally …
/r/MensRights05/08/17 01:33 AM
2

The negative reviews of the Red Pill are dishonest. It's as simple as that. Feminism is a very powerful movement, and people who work for large media companies know what side of the issue they're supposed to fall on. So they've been forced to reach for straws.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 12:45 AM
18

one of the most expensive private schools in the nation Bloody spoiled brats. "Emotional labor" is a funny one. It means "I'm gonna get over-emotional and bitch and complain and nag my husband and he's supposed to thank me for it".
/r/MensRights05/08/17 12:26 AM
4

Fair enough. My description was admittedly simplistic and dismissive. I'm sure it works for a lot of guys. I think you take the "alpha" and "beta" stuff too far though. It seems like you're reducing men to how women view men whereas we should be defining ourselves on our own terms.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 11:49 PM
1

They declined due to corporate free trade agreements that were only possible due to the decline of unions (and their neutering by various legislation going back to Taft-Hartley).
/r/MensRights04/08/17 11:02 PM
2

This reminds me of the film Monster. It is without question the most sympathetic film portrayal of a serial killer ever made. Aileen Wuornos was abused as a child. She grew up to become a prostitute who killed her John's. Some feminists even regard her as a hero who fought the patriarchy. Well most of it not all male serial killers were also abused as children, usually by their mothers. We aren't encouraged to view with them sympathy, and we certainly don't claim they are "fighting the matriarch…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 10:20 PM
1

IMF agrees: decline of union power has increased income inequality
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:39 PM
6

lol seriously. Who else are they gonna blame?
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:18 PM
1

smart?
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:13 PM
3

That's odd, since there are posts on this sub showing that women have lied about rape for reasons as trivial as not wanting to pay cab fare.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:10 PM
4

Unfortunately this isn't just true of feminists -- though they are especially egregious offenders.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:09 PM
4

Apparently, since becoming the parent of a son Jesus. Someone call CPS. I can't believe some irresponsible asshole impregnated that thing.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:04 PM
1

it's real aim is universal Socialism with a capital 'S'. I think many feminists have that aim, but I don't think the people funding them do. Viewed historically it's not unusual for powerful interests to fund their alleged opposition in order to control it. For example during the Cold War a huge number of leftist groups in Europe were essentially run by Western intelligence agencies, and in some cases encouraged to carry out terrorist attacks. This was designed to (a) discredit the left and (b) …
/r/MensRights04/08/17 08:34 PM
33

Turns out there is a rape culture, feminists were just looking at the wrong sex. And not only are males more likely to underreport sex assaults, but they are more likely to suffer negative psychological effects from them. A study conducted by Florida Atlantic University found that men are more likely to develop depression and deal with adverse psychological outcomes than women who are sexually assaulted. Even as an MRA I found this surprising. I would have assumed it was the opposite.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 07:56 PM
20

The term "The Red Pill" derives from the film The Matrix. It suggests swallowing a harsh reality vs happy ignorance. The Red Pill sub is for guys trying to get laid. They focus on self-improvement and trying to act in a way that they think women find attractive. They are obsessed with the concept of the "alpha male". I find it kind of cringey to be honest: spending your whole life like a dancing monkey trying to impress women. Talk about exhausting. Having said that some men claim it has helped …
/r/MensRights04/08/17 07:40 PM
2

Yes good points. Feminism has no "end-point". Even now that women have more rights than men and are doing better in most quality of life indicators it is still claimed that we are living in a "patriarchy" and "we have a long way to go" before achieving "gender equality." Thus the increasingly bizarre focus on ridiculous trivialities like "Manspreading". Feminism is also now a billion dollar industry, so thousands of people rely on pushing this garbage. Feminism can certainly not "succeed" in its…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 07:18 PM
1

I say this without rancour - feminism cannot possibly succeed when it is working so damn hard to sabotage any and all attempts at 'progress'. It can and is. Feminism has never really been a grass roots organic uprising by the average man or woman. It was started by rich woman who were envious/resentful of men, then it was financed by the huge capitalist foundations (Ford, Rockefeller etc.) for reasons that remain somewhat mysterious. Arguably feminism has always been opposed even by the majority…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 07:02 PM
2

Yes that leaves a bad taste in my mouth as well. A lot of the MRM leaders like Karen Straughan use statistics as a rhetorical device to disprove male privilege and patriarchy but they embrace far right wing politics that harm men. At least half of the posters here are pro-war and anti-union for example, which makes absolutely no sense for anyone who cares about the well being of men and boys. OP is just another troll though. Feminism opposes men's rights so we have no choice but to oppose them.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 06:47 PM
1

Pennie is getting absolutely savaged in the comments. Evidently Wired was the wrong venue for her man-hating bilge. This comment is interesting: fixerdave • 2 days ago Once upon a time I thought automation would, eventually, lead to a society where we actually worked less, even where work became unnecessary. But, reality set in. Some estimate that around 60% of our current employment is entirely unnecessary; they're just make-work jobs. Nobody, other than those employed in them, would care if th…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 06:36 PM
2

No he's absolutely correct. Americans in particular have an extremely warped perception of "left" and "right". They don't realize that the quasi-left is run by the same corporations than the run the right (hence the focus on identity politics and feminism rather than class and war). “There is only one party in the United States, the Property Party … and it has two right wings: Republican and Democrat.” - Gore Vidal
/r/MensRights04/08/17 06:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter