TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

motorbird88 Archive

View 0 posts and 243 comments by motorbird88 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Ok, then that would be a small rape culture... If we could get it that low it probably wouldn’t even be perceptible.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 02:40 PM
1

No, what’s the issue? I don’t know what the hell you’re talking about “competence issues”, or why women would be slugging it out on the street...
/r/MensRights09/02/23 02:15 PM
1

Rape culture is a group of people that protect/encourage/ cover up rapes. They aren't investigating a single rape, they're investigating a culture of rape in frats.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 03:42 PM
1

No, investigating rape culture doesn’t disprove rape culture. That’s idiotic.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 02:54 PM
1

There are lots of things you can do, like set up an independent group that investigates sexual assault. Instead of having to report it to your supervising officer, who might have an interest in covering it up.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 02:53 PM
1

And in your instance that you linked to me - they addressed it. This is literally the opposite of what you propose exists. Why would they address it if it didn't exist.. You don't live with a group of people without knowing what's going on. Oh my sweet summer child. If you think rape is the violently aggressive sexual penetration of someone violently resisting is the "norm" then you are confused. It also doesn't help that "regret rape" is a real thing too. "I regret sleeping with him so he raped…
/r/MensRights07/02/23 06:07 PM
0

I disagree.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:53 PM
0

No, I have data on 26,000... And you can't read because there were only about 4,000 complaints filed. Most sexual assault goes unreported, many studies have shown this to be true.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:42 PM
0

But 26,000 is still the approximate number of sexual assaults.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:31 PM
0

It's not 26,000 complaints it's an estimated 26,000 sexual assaults. Do you think all criminals get caught?
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:23 PM
1

But there are crimes where people regularly escape justice. Yes, 26,000 means 26,000.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:13 PM
1

Bill Cosby, Jerry Sandusky, Harvey Weinstein all got away with it for years. https://www.usccr.gov/files/pubs/docs/09242013_Statutory_Enforcement_Report_Sexual_Assault_in_the_Military.pdf Sexual assault is so covered up in the military only 300 went to trial of an estimated 26,000 that were sexually assaulted.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 01:52 PM
0

I didn't say America has terrorism culture. Terrorism culture is mostly in the middle east. America used to have a rape culture, but things have changed since the me too movement.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 01:37 PM
1

Yeah, there are radical groups that endorse, promote, and encourage it... They have the whole thing about getting 72 virgins after you die.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 01:34 PM
0

What in the ever loving fuck are you talking about? Who said innocent until proven guilty creates a rape culture?
/r/MensRights07/02/23 12:56 PM
1

Are there terrorist cultures? Yes or no?
/r/MensRights07/02/23 12:54 PM
0

It's a major part of the culture, actually. I think it is a systematic issue.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:01 AM
0

Of course not. But it's a culture that promotes/protects rapists, so it's a rape culture.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:39 AM
0

Then why is rape at least 3 times more common among fraternities?
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:23 AM
0

Well that's not something they would admit, so even if it's true it would be impossible to prove to you. I think the fact they have such high rates of rape is evidence enough. You don't live with a group of people without knowing what's going on. It's bullshit to claim they had no idea.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 12:52 AM
0

Will you concede that there was a culture of rape before they got busted?
/r/MensRights07/02/23 12:21 AM
0

That's called a lie.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 11:15 PM
1

So there is no terrorism culture?
/r/MensRights06/02/23 10:16 PM
-1

No it doesn't. Any society that enables and defends rapists is a rape culture.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 10:16 PM
-2

The fraternity is a society that enables it...
/r/MensRights06/02/23 10:14 PM
-2

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-11-11/fraternities-sexual-assault-violence-usc
/r/MensRights06/02/23 07:12 PM
2

USC sigma nu got suspended. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-11-11/fraternities-sexual-assault-violence-usc fraternity men are three times more likely to rape women than nonaffiliated classmates. https://wiki.ubc.ca/Rape_Culture_in_Fraternities
/r/MensRights06/02/23 07:11 PM
0

The book doesn't say that though.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 05:19 PM
-4

It's a culture where rape is lauded and rapists defend each other...
/r/MensRights06/02/23 05:19 PM
-5

Uh-huh, and there are cultures (like college frats) that support those values..
/r/MensRights06/02/23 05:18 PM
-6

No, just give me proof they said that. Give me a link or something. You are full of shit.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 04:33 PM
0

So you think rapists don't protect each other? You sound very naive.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 04:26 PM
-13

Link me where it says that. Show me exactly where that is written. I call bullshit.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 04:22 PM
-26

There ARE subcultures where it's lauded and the rapists protect each other.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 04:10 PM
-23

Haha, you can’t be this stupid can you? “Drug culture cannot exist when the act itself is a crime.” Do you think this is true also?
/r/MensRights06/02/23 03:48 PM
1

Men as a whole, as a group do NOT have universally "More Power" than women Yes they do. The vast majority of powerful positions are held by men. The shear FACT that there are men who have less power than women proves this. False, here's a simple thought experiment: Randomly distribute 100 dollars to 1 group of 100 people and 200 dollars to another group of 100 people. One group will be richer than the other even if each individual member doesn't have money.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 01:21 AM
1

Men have more power than women. This is a fact. I don't know why you think the existence of men without power proves this wrong.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 10:44 PM
1

You're wrong bro. That's not how language works. People say men are stronger than women.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 10:34 PM
1

When you say "Men hold more power" you are not being specific, and thus the implication is that ALL men hold more power. Men are physically stronger than women right? That doesn't mean that every man is stronger than every woman.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 09:58 PM
1

Because men do hold more power. That doesn't mean every man is powerful.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 08:48 PM
2

Then it's not a basic attribute of human language.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 03:58 PM
2

So if I say Americans like to drink coffee that means the rest of the world doesn’t like coffee?
/r/MensRights12/01/23 02:32 PM
1

Nope, talking about one groups problems doesn’t imply anything about other groups. Women are neglected in poorer countries, this is true if men are doing worse or better.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 01:47 PM
0

In what way am I treating men as a monolith? What did I say that put that idea in your brain?
/r/MensRights12/01/23 01:13 PM
0

No, you’re just strawmaning the report. You think the report says women are worse off than men, but it just says women are neglected.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 01:12 PM
0

Well that's not what the report is claiming is it...
/r/MensRights11/01/23 11:57 PM
1

Do you think men in poor countries are less neglected? YEEES.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 11:35 PM
0

Because that's what patriarchy means.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 10:26 PM
-3

It's not equal because men hold more power.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 10:24 PM
-7

Because one side is in charge and one isn't.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 10:18 PM
-8

Doesn't matter. Can't be equal if one side is in charge.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 10:08 PM
-1

Because pharma companies could easily help them. You said they don't measure things, but there are a bunch of charts and data.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 09:23 PM
2

Compared to all countries.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 06:10 PM
3

Patriarchy means men are in charge. It can't be equal if one side is in charge.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 05:36 PM
3

What do you mean they don't measure these things? There was a bunch of data. Theres a table about maternal mortality rates being disproportionally high in developing countries.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 05:35 PM
1

Yes I've seen that too. Good example.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 09:53 PM
-10

Lol, you’ve never seen a dude talk to a girl that doesn’t want to?
/r/MensRights05/12/22 08:29 PM
1

It doesn't have to be common to prove your statement wrong.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 09:09 PM
1

Because I've observed some men who attained power through corruption, extortion, nepotism etc.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 08:56 PM
1

How do you know men achieved their positions purely through merit?
/r/MensRights03/12/22 08:45 PM
1

What makes it artificial?
/r/MensRights03/12/22 08:26 PM
-25

Lol, that’s backwards logic. We won’t hire women because they won’t work as much as men, they don’t work as much as men because we won’t hire them...
/r/MensRights03/12/22 07:49 PM
-25

Men being preferred over women for top roles is also well documented.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 06:57 PM
-44

Men still make more money and hold more positions of power.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 06:19 PM
1

So you don't believe giving women the right to vote and own property helped them gain more power?
/r/MensRights05/11/22 04:52 PM
1

No, you're misrepresenting what I'm saying. Which is a strawman fallacy.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 03:24 PM
1

You're misunderstanding what I'm saying. I didn't say it was impossible for women to become leaders. I'm saying the laws in place made it much harder for women.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 02:38 PM
0

I didn’t say they do it for the benefit of men. I’m just saying not allowing women to vote means less women will be in power.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 04:34 PM
0

I don’t know. That’s not what we’re talking about. I’m saying allowing women to vote allowed more women to be in power.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 03:41 PM
1

The apex fallacy is when you believe a group benefits from a small majority of them being in power, but I never said anything about that benefitting men in general. I’m saying people in power used to be almost exclusively men, now more women are in power because laws keeping them out of power have changed. I don’t know if this benefits women in general.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 03:01 PM
1

Then why are more women in power now?
/r/MensRights04/11/22 05:13 AM
1

No, most people in power were still men.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 02:26 PM
1

Voting was only done by men.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 05:57 AM
1

Yes, there are lots of laws that keep women out of power.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 05:47 AM
1

Common law is still law. And women couldn't vote until the the 1920s lol.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 03:23 PM
1

Social norms also play a big part.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 03:00 PM
1

But would it actually negatively impact men?
/r/MensRights02/11/22 02:41 PM
1

Why not? What's the problem with it?
/r/MensRights02/11/22 04:36 AM
1

If you think laws like this don't negatively affect people why can't we make laws like that against men?
/r/MensRights02/11/22 04:28 AM
1

I already said you can’t run a business if you can’t own property.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 05:26 AM
1

But you said there were no laws that prevent women from owning property. Or are married women not women?
/r/MensRights01/11/22 04:16 AM
1

Yes, her husband having full rights to it means she doesn't own it independently. With the passage of the Married Women’s Property Act in 1848 and the Act Concerning the Rights and Liabilities of Husband and Wife in 1860, New York dramatically expanded the property rights of married women. Besides the right to independently conduct business, women could hold sole ownership of any inherited or allotted property, as well as file lawsuits independently.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 03:26 AM
1

You said there were no laws barring women from owning property, but this proves there were laws barring married women from owning property.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 02:32 AM
1

Yes, so laws barring single women from owning property are still allowed.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 12:46 AM
1

So before this women couldn’t own property. Not being able to own property means you can’t own a business.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 03:11 PM
1

LOL, this is the law that GAVE women the right to own property. The fact it only applies to married women means laws barring single women from owning property are still allowed.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 05:01 AM
1

It still proves we had laws that prevented women from owning property. If women can’t own property they can’t own a business.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 04:34 AM
1

But it was after the Married women's property act of 1848. https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/married-womens-property-act-1848#:~:text=The%20Married%20Women's%20Property%20Act,to%20own%20and%20control%20property.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 02:34 AM
1

A very bizarre response bringing up countries that had laws prohibiting women from holding leadership positions! Why? That's what I'm arguing. There were no laws in the US or UK prohibiting women from running companies ever. Source?
/r/MensRights31/10/22 01:54 AM
1

But there are multiple countries keeping them out of power.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:21 PM
1

Ok, so prove they’re poor and homeless.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:20 PM
1

You said the majority of whites are homeless.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:13 PM
1

No one means no one.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:11 PM
1

Source or stfu.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:11 PM
1

But you said no one, so you were wrong.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:07 PM
1

No, you just made a bullshit claim you can’t back up lmao.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:06 PM
1

But not the Middle East..
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:04 PM
1

You made the claim lol, you have to back it up.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:01 PM
1

Oof, imagine being this ignorant of the world.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:01 PM
1

The countries that have laws from keeping women out of leadership have no women in leadership, while countries that don’t tend to have women in leadership. I believe it’s the laws that are the key difference. But if you have a different theory, let’s hear it. Teaching and nursing aren’t well paid or highly regarded, that’s like saying Indians are privileged because they run so many gas stations.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:00 PM
1

I didn’t say they were bad. I said keeping women out of power is bad, and people disagree with that on this sub.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 05:55 PM
0

Then he’s also using whataboutism lol.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 05:53 PM
0

But it still has meaning even if it’s a logical fallacy.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 05:52 PM
0

But it still has meaning even if it’s false.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 05:52 PM
1

Source or stfu.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 05:50 PM
1

I argued for more women in leadership and you’re arguing against me. Simple as.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 05:49 PM
2

It proves they’ve been favoring men up until recent social pressures forced them to change.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 07:25 AM
2

That doesn’t mean it’s not logically meaningful.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 07:12 AM
2

These guys do not run things for the benefit of men in general How do you know?
/r/MensRights30/10/22 07:07 AM
2

What does that have to do with whether it was a logically meaningful statement?
/r/MensRights30/10/22 07:06 AM
2

How is it not logically meaningful?
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:59 AM
2

It means you don't have a problem with oppression. Well the first quote, not the second.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:56 AM
2

They earned it with violence and oppression. So? Why does it matter? No I mean, I don't care as long as the rules are fair. I just don't wanna make things "equal" by force.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:53 AM
2

It's not a strawman because you actually said it. You changed your argument. First you don't care about violence, now violence is bad when women do it.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:50 AM
2

So violence and oppression are fair now? wtf
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:41 AM
2

Who happen to be men.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:40 AM
2

When I said they used violence and oppression you said so what. So why can't women use violence and oppression?
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:34 AM
2

But you supported legal discrimination when it kept women out of power.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:30 AM
2

How so? It has been the trend as you yourself showed. Western countries have more fair rules and that has led to more women in power. As opposed to middle eastern countries that keep women out of power.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:14 AM
2

I don't either, but if the rules are fair that means more women will come into leadership positions.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:12 AM
2

Moving up the ranks has made women the primary breadwinners in 40 percent of U.S. households yet they only earn 78 cents for every dollar when compared with men, according to the study. Hmmm, but they still earn less. Curious.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:11 AM
2

Then there are going to be more women in power. And that's just something you're going to have to deal with.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 05:58 AM
1

So we should keep women out of power because that's what's best for them? BRILLIANT.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 05:54 AM
1

Because violence and oppression are bad mmmkay.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 05:44 AM
0

He set me up for it. I don't know why someone would unironically argue for only men to be in power lol.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 05:44 AM
-1

They earned it with violence and oppression.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 05:42 AM
2

Men own the most assets.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 03:49 AM
1

No they aren’t 😂😂 😂 Wtf are you talking about.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 03:47 AM
0

Something is wrong with having only male leaders because that requires keeping women from becoming leaders.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 03:44 AM
-2

What about Clinton, bush, Obama, Trump and Biden? Only men!
/r/MensRights29/10/22 10:26 PM
-8

No, because most positions of power were still held by white men.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 10:23 PM
2

Switzerland and Finland aren't the world either lmao.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 09:32 PM
1

But it’s still mostly men in power, and surveys have shown many people in America are still uncomfortable with a female president.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 08:38 PM
2

Why so what?
/r/MensRights29/10/22 08:23 PM
-2

Because we live in a patriarchal society and men are viewed as better leaders.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 08:16 PM
-17

But most positions of power are held by men.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 08:00 PM
-7

No that’s not why men hold more positions of power.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 07:59 PM
-29

Men make more money and hold more positions of power.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 07:12 PM
1

Both.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 03:04 PM
-7

When men get bullied for not acting masculine.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 02:54 PM
1

I had explained this in my previous comments and I really have no idea how to break this down anymore simply for you to understand it. No, you didn't. Or else you could easily copy and paste it and end the argument.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:50 PM
0

No, I can't. That's why I keep asking what you meant.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:33 PM
0

Until now, of course. Now even if you live together, you can be screwed by the government. Yep, you did say that. I know how to copy and paste too, so I have evidence.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:26 PM
2

You said that the law that makes families get married hurts them. Implying marriage hurts them. Then you just use the common avoidance tactic of “I already explained that”. Even though you’re still arguing with me, you could just end it by copy and pasting your answer, so you must enjoy arguing.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:06 PM
1

But there’s nothing there that explains why marriage would hurt a family.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:01 PM
1

Copy and paste what you said and I’ll admit I’m wrong.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 04:59 PM
1

No you didn’t.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 04:57 PM
-6

But you said families would get screwed over, not there might be less families. How would families get screwed over?
/r/MensRights28/09/22 04:54 PM
-6

Ok how are families getting screwed over by this law?
/r/MensRights28/09/22 04:50 PM
-7

How does marriage screw over a family?? Wtf
/r/MensRights28/09/22 04:49 PM
0

How does marriage destroy the family unit??
/r/MensRights28/09/22 04:46 PM
1

You’re*
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:59 PM
1

It also includes individuals.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:58 PM
1

You said everyone, not all group of people.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:56 PM
1

How so?
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:54 PM
1

So the queen of England was oppressed? And you don’t know my metrics for oppression.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 05:34 AM
1

As in not everyone has been oppressed. I was disagreeing when you said everyone is oppressed.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 05:30 AM
1

Who tf said no one has been oppressed lol.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 05:29 AM
1

I’m just pointing out that women have been historically oppressed, which is true. Then you said everyone is historically oppressed, which is false.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 05:26 AM
1

How would I oppress them if I wasn’t alive?
/r/MensRights14/09/22 05:22 AM
1

Then why are you saying I picked them?
/r/MensRights14/09/22 05:22 AM
1

So you believe women were never oppressed?
/r/MensRights14/09/22 05:19 AM
1

I didn’t pick it, I learned about it in history.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 05:17 AM
1

By that logic the people on this thread denying the oppression of women are also committing oppression.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 05:16 AM
1

How would I affect events hundreds of years ago?
/r/MensRights14/09/22 03:19 AM
1

I didn't pick, people hundreds of years ago did.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 03:10 AM
2

Because everyone wasn't oppressed. That's stupid.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 03:07 AM
1

I'll admit they're being oppressed if you admit women were also historically oppressed.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 03:02 AM
2

Good thing there is no draft.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 02:50 AM
1

Not ones that oppress them.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 02:43 AM
3

It's something people actively seek.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 02:16 AM
-1

Except there are laws that specifically target women.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 02:15 AM
0

But they weren't enslaved because they were men.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:44 AM
-1

Men have never been oppressed.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:28 AM
0

When were men oppressed??
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:06 AM
0

Then women were oppressed.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:03 AM
-3

There was never any law that explicitly said "only men can vote". lmao yes there was. And you think it's just a coincidence no women are in the upper class??
/r/MensRights13/09/22 10:48 PM
1

Women are also discriminated against.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 10:43 PM
3

No, that sounds like a sad cop-out.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 09:41 PM
0

First, being able to vote was tied to selective service so not being able to vote wasn't necessarily an example of oppression when you consider how selective service is a gross violation of bodily autonomy. There was a time it wasn't tied to selective service, and all men could vote. if both men and women were unable to vote and you decide that not voting constitutes oppression Men could vote. All the voting was done by men.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 09:39 PM
1

lol
/r/MensRights13/09/22 09:16 PM
0

The oppression of one group doesn't negate the oppression of another. Why do people keep playing this card lmao.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 09:16 PM
0

You said no it isn't....
/r/MensRights13/09/22 09:14 PM
0

In America we also had gender based oppression.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 09:03 PM
1

Not being allowed to vote isn't oppression?? You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 09:01 PM
1

Nope, all men could vote.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 08:19 PM
1

In the western world, most men were farmers who maybe could read and write. But they could vote, whereas women could not, even if they could read and write.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 08:12 PM
-1

Yeah, there's a bunch of countries like America where men got the vote decades before women. So that's an example of women being oppressed.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 08:11 PM
2

As long as there's been democracy, men have been voting. The oppression of one group doesn't negate the oppression of another group.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 07:53 PM
-4

When? In early 20th century America men could vote but women couldn't.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 07:28 PM
1

And they had to carry a heavy burden. That burden is in the eyes of feminists a privilege. I think it's the fact they make all the decisions that's the privilege.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 07:25 PM
-9

They used to not be able to vote for example.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 04:43 PM
-10

But women have been historically oppressed.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 03:26 PM
-1

Well men are statistically richer than women.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 05:38 PM
0

It is negligible because there are also more women than men.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 05:21 PM
0

No it doesn't lol. Married men: 67.54 Married women: 68.33 That's a negligible difference.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 04:18 PM
-7

That you're wrong...
/r/MensRights04/09/22 04:00 PM
-9

This doesn't show any real difference.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 03:41 PM
-9

Do you have stats to prove that men are more likely to be alone?
/r/MensRights04/09/22 02:00 PM
1

Lol, this scene has the right so triggered.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 09:33 PM
1

Damn, has that affected you?
/r/MensRights01/09/22 01:01 AM
1

That would suck. But signing up doesn’t hurt you.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:59 AM
0

And that hurts men how?
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:54 AM
0

There’s no draft.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:52 AM
0

It hurts women. Meanwhile men get their boner pills paid for by Medicare.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:49 AM
1

Nope, they oppress women and help men. They just got rid of roe v wade.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:41 AM
0

Them too.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:41 PM
1

But men are still biased towards men.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:34 PM
0

That's my point. Men are biased towards men. Thanks for proving me right.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:15 PM
1

But you chose men because you have a bias.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 05:34 PM
1

You have common interests with lots of groups. You probably have more common interests with your city or town than with all men in America.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 05:31 PM
1

But why combine forces with men? Why not another group?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 05:28 PM
1

Why? Do you care about them or something?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 05:26 PM
0

Then why did you make this post?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 05:24 PM
-1

That’s not a logical flaw.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 05:22 PM
-3

But government is run by men, so logically most tax money would benefit them.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 05:09 PM
1

Why would you be a chump?
/r/MensRights29/08/22 01:49 PM
3

Because it’s considered a noble thing to do.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 10:51 PM
9

Are you kidding? I hear that argument all the time.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 09:54 PM
0

I didn’t say anybody should do anything. I’m just pointing out the gender pay gap.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 06:19 AM
1

So it's unpaid labor.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 04:05 AM
1

I mean they don't get money for it. As we can see in gender pay gap
/r/MensRights07/08/22 02:46 AM
1

The labor of bearing a child. I don’t care who’s fault it is, I was just pointing out that it exists.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 02:03 AM
-1

It doesn’t exist... okay it exists, but it’s for a good reason!
/r/MensRights06/08/22 08:41 PM
0

It might partially be because of discrimination.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 08:04 PM
0

But you said it didn’t exist? Now your giving me a reason it exists..
/r/MensRights06/08/22 08:03 PM
1

Controlling for variables doesn’t disprove this fact. It’s just proving a different fact.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 07:57 PM
-7

So women have to do a lot of unpaid labor for humanity to exist.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 07:55 PM
-1

What data disproves this??
/r/MensRights06/08/22 07:48 PM
-19

Yeah, it’s still interesting that men are in more high paying jobs.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 07:44 PM
-21

Yeah, this takes everyone into account.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 07:38 PM
-30

It’s not disproven, you can easily google it. https://www.epi.org/blog/equal-pay-day-there-has-been-little-progress-in-closing-the-gender-wage-gap/
/r/MensRights06/08/22 07:08 PM
-4

What’s the logic fallacy?
/r/MensRights05/08/22 05:21 PM
1

Show me. Link it.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 04:14 PM
1

People on here do talk about all women, and I’ve never called them out...
/r/MensRights01/08/22 05:51 AM
0

It's implied she isn't referring to all men. This implies that she is refering to men in general as in (maybe) not all but the majority of men. Exactly, they are just stating their experience with men.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 01:48 AM
-4

Not on the posts he commented on.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 09:03 PM
4

That’s what I said.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 08:35 PM
-28

Because you aren’t calling out hypocrisy, you’re just being a troll.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 08:32 PM
-30

They aren’t saying all men are like that..
/r/MensRights31/07/22 08:28 PM
-32

Why do you keep saying not all men are like that?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:59 PM
-9

And people say society is dismissive of men’s problems...
/r/MensRights29/07/22 07:07 PM
0

Companies that offer better maternity leave and child care aide will pay less average income to compensate. It attracts more women but helps create the gender pay gap. So you might be correct, yet the pay gap persists.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 05:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter