TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

moutnmn87 Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by moutnmn87 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

with IVF those that want to have a baby can do that by themselves too. They think they don’t NEED men. The only way they will want to be with one is if they WANT them and see the value in them. However, men still NEED women. So this bit actually only applies to those who want to have children. In reality that demographic is a shrinking portion of the population. Which is totally fine. People who don't want children shouldn't be having them. In reality most of us get a lot of emotional/mental ben…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/25 12:03 AM
1

Nothing should ever be blindly trusted. Also developing a different method for engineering a vaccine doesn't mean you're changing the definition of vaccine. The COVID vaccine works by triggering an immune response just like vaccines always have. It is rather comical to me how Trump stopped bragging about having developed this wonderful vaccine once anti lockdown rhetoric morphed into antivax rhetoric.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 12:37 PM
1

There are two big groups in the world. One is motivated by emotions and wanting to fit in. The other is motivated by logic and reason. It's not exclusive, but you will find that the first group leans heavily left and the other heavily right. Feminist arguments are mostly fueled by emotion, so if you disagree you "must be" on the right. Not sure where you're from but I would argue this is very much not the case in the US. Here the notion that the right is more guided by reason and reality is quit…
/r/MensRights18/03/25 10:10 PM
5

Theocrats (both Islamic and Christian)generally have some really fucked up perspectives when it comes to sex. Consent is at the very least seen as less important than whether sky daddy approves and at worst is seen as completely irrelevant to morality. Most theocrats from promoters of sharia to homophobic Christians follow this pattern
/r/MensRights08/12/24 03:56 PM
1

I suspect they conveniently left out divorcees. If so it is obvious selection bias. Would be kind of like scrubbing everyone that died from the data when studying drug safety.The meager difference they're pointing to may very well flip if they also asked divorcees were you happier married or single.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 05:59 PM
1

I disagree that marriage is important or should be saved. The only benefit that pretty much all married folks want is choosing who is your closest kin that will make decisions if your incapacitated and inherit your stuff when you die etc. There is no reason this benefit should be restricted to romantic partners. A simple no hassle way to do this would be just as useful to people who are estranged from their family and want to name a specific friend or relative etc as their closest kin. There isn…
/r/MensRights21/02/24 05:54 PM
1

Well there's several ways you could take this hypothetical. For example if we are talking about slaves raising the kids there probably would be mostly women doing it because the stronger male slaves would be considered more capable of doing other more strenuous work. If we are talking people being paid to do it who ends up doing it would largely depend on who is considered capable and who is willing to do the job for the pay offered. I don't really see any scenario where where volunteer labor wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 11:22 PM
1

Our culture and perception of morality etc would have to change quite drastically for farming children in artificial wombs to be considered acceptable or moral etc. Even surrogacy is illegal in some places and considered immoral by many people. Why should we assume that sexism in this very different hypothetical world would take the same form as it does in ours? Especially why should we assume that a group spending massive amounts of money to get something like this set up would rely on somethin…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 09:28 PM
–

Did we read the same comments? While there definitely were some comments opposed to the writers tone I certainly wouldn't call it overwhelming. Seems like at least half the comments took a similar tone as the article with tons of endorsement for ideas like physical violence in response to infidelity is justified etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 07:43 PM
1

By the time kids had been walking for several years childcare pretty much became child labor and punishment for not doing what we were told. In my opinion it clearly wasn't great for producing emotionally healthy individuals but it was quite effective at producing busy worker bees. If a company or country were to take measures as drastic as farming humans because they want an increased population to have more workers employing such a strategy might well be seen as the the most effective /efficie…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 06:37 PM
1

Where did I suggest that women should be volunteering for childcare? My point was simply that this hypothetical scenario you're talking about is so drastically different from our current culture that speculating about how the work would get done based on our culture is silly. The whole women should be the childcare provider idea is thankfully getting less popular these days. So I would say even if we were to project our current cultural sentiments onto such a scenario and hypothesize that it wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 06:20 PM
1

Gendered expectations for women to do the majority of childcare are universal across all cultures. There is no reason to expect that to change. This depends very heavily on what specifically you call childcare. Where I grew up this was the case for toddlers but definitely not older kids. In fact once kids were no longer toddlers childcare consisted almost entirely of punishment for doing shit we weren't supposed to which was often seen as more the dads responsibility/mons were kind of viewed as …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 05:19 PM
1

A scenario where artificial womb farms are actually socially acceptable is very drastically different from our current culture. Who knows what sort of social expectations there would be around childcare in such a society? The variety of societies humans have built and social rules we have invented is huge so I would be cautious about projecting our current social values onto a scenario that would obviously have to be very different. As for childcare yes especially babies would be a lot of work b…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 01:53 PM
2

I think you have the more resources thing backwards. Currently labor is absolutely essential in order for things like mineral resources or property to actually be worth anything and there's no sign of this changing ING anytime soon. For this reason a collapsing population is likely to result in much fewer goods available despite the fact that raw materials are now shared among a smaller population. The fewer goods thing is most severe in a steep population decline scenario because that means few…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 01:33 PM
1

I dislike the whole concept of blame being part of the discussion when it comes to romantic success. In reality it is a lottery. Sure there are things one can do to increase the odds but no strategy should be seen as a sure bet for romantic success. I have never been desperate to find romance but still ended up in a romantic relationship. I absolutely recognize that us finding each other was to a large extent due to chance. Sure I went on a dating app and chatted with people but it never was a s…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 09:13 PM
1

Pretty sure the redpill sub got banned or maybe it was the mens rights one I can't say for sure. I went on it once in a while back when I first got reddit. Didn't really get the impression from it that this and other anti redpill communities portray it accurately. Like I saw a lot of absurd takes but rarely saw anyone indicating that they felt like women were obligated or should be forced to give them sex like i saw alleged on feminist subreddits. Ironically I saw a lot of what I considered to b…
/r/ExRedPill20/02/23 09:51 PM
1

Yeah that is most definitely not true. While it is true that most single guys would glady have sex with most women most is not anywhere close to all. A lot of people argue that if women weren't concern for their physical safety and were assured of having an orgasm most women would be like this too. It makes sense that this would make a large difference so the gendered difference in libido may not be as large as first appears. Also this is sexual attraction not romantic attraction. For most peopl…
/r/ExRedPill18/02/23 03:22 AM
1

I think it's more that it's harder to tell whether someone is being disingenuous online vs in person. The vast majority of online interactions I've had really didn't feel fake and manufactured but I've never tried to get laid by strangers online or irl. I probably would also think that of conversations centered around trying to get laid. I always saw trying to get laid by playing the numbers game, cold approaching strangers etc as a stupid disingenuous game I had no interest in playing. I actual…
/r/ExRedPill18/02/23 01:03 AM
1

As a guy who has never had any interest in the kind of pursuit described in op I can tell you not aggressively pursuing strangers is most certainly not a necessity for finding a girlfriend. None of the three relationships I've had started with me pursuing random strangers. I've always seen being seductive/charming as a stupid game I have no interest in participating in. In two of my relationships I was heavily pursued despite not being particularly interested in dating and those two both ended b…
/r/ExRedPill17/02/23 11:10 PM
1

I doubt that's actually true. I happen to believe women are capable of doing just about anything a man can they just don't want to.Dont want to and can't are not the same thing. I'm sure if there were no men around women would start working trades etc rather than going back to being hunter gatherers.
/r/AntiFeminists04/10/22 11:12 AM
2

Meaning we shouldn't be conflating victims and perpetrators just because they both happen to fit in some box we or society has made. Of course determining why people are victimized is important if we wish to find solutions and prevent future victimization. Personally I happen to think both the people proposing solutions and the people pretending there is nothing that can be done oversimplify the causes though.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 10:39 PM
7

How is pointing out that we shouldn't assume victims to also be perpetrators just because some demographic they are in has a higher percentage of perpetrators disregarding history?
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:52 PM
16

Men perpetrating more violent crime does not necessarily indicate that male victims are also perpetrators of violent crime. One person can easily commit violent crimes against many different people. Why is pretending that most victims must also be perpetrators despite not having made the slightest attempt to determine whether that actually is the case ok when talking about male victims? This is actually the same logic as regularly gets brought up in discussions about racism with the whole violen…
/r/MensRights30/09/22 03:58 PM
31

According to the article the guy is claiming she said that. Doesn't say she admitted to saying that. While this is a disturbingly common way of thinking about such situations admitting that would've almost certainly weakened her defense so it wouldn't be surprising if she denied it despite having said it.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 01:58 PM
6

The article doesn't really say anything that to me would indicate misandry being a factor in the court decision. Sounds like the classic lack of evidence which is a well known cause of low conviction rates for alleged rapists. That being said I have no doubt that a lot of people saying this was the correct decision would be saying the decision clearly indicates misogyny if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 01:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter