TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mrcap Archive

View 0 posts and 60 comments by mrcap on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

I believe that I last longer in bed because of it And may I ask, is that to your partner's benefit, or yours...
/r/MensRights08/10/12 11:31 AM
1

"most women are children in adult bodys..." Women have the vote...
/r/MensRights06/10/12 11:27 AM
3

benned
/r/MensRights06/10/12 11:21 AM
3

"If a woman hits you smack her back." I agree entirely. Yes, SRSers, if a woman hits me I reserve the right to hit her back. Why should I take shit from someone just because they are female? Explain to me why you think I shouldn't hit back, if a woman hits me first.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:28 PM
7

If you were raped then go to the police. You don't need approval from anyone to get justice.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:21 PM
3

Feminists make misogynists of males.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 02:49 AM
-2

What can you do? Take my advice - nothing. Your advocacy is not wanted or desirable. Go away.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 02:48 AM
26

And before concern trolls jump in with "but it's not sexist just because they exclude men" know that there is no male-only fundrasing event. No male version of Race for Life exists. Of course some would say that's not sexist either. After all, we mustn't upset women. That's the main thing right?
/r/MensRights30/09/12 02:41 AM
-11

Odd isn't it? Women complain endlessly when men control anything, yet there's no problem when women do. Women are stupid and sexist. What do you expect?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:20 PM
-3

This proves that for women the most important thing in a relationship is her financial security, while for men it's companionship. Men would all be happier if we were all gay.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:16 PM
-9

Welcome to the dark side brother - a world of shadows where the things women say aren't automatically cheered to the rafters. What's the point of a so-called men's movement if they are willing to allow women to speak for them? Pointless much?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:17 AM
10

"The UK has the highest rate of female imprisonment in the European Union" says the article. Yes, and the UK also has the highest rate of male imprisonment in the EU too. So it's obviously sexism, innit? /s
/r/MensRights17/09/12 03:05 PM
9

The new elites - particularly the MSM - still see men as brainless donkeys. Hence all the attack articles savaging men on a regular basis, and Hanna Rosin's popularity with the the Atlantic Journal etc. We have to go beyond the notion of politiciand being the only elite group that matters; "opinion formers" have as much a hand in shaping society's attitudes towards men, and are just as dangerous to the MRM.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 02:53 PM
23

For one brief moment I thought this was a story about record numbers of women being convicted of child abuse... Instead it's more handwringing about how women are still held accountable for the crimes they commit - oh the misogyny!!
/r/MensRights17/09/12 02:43 PM
-14

And what makes you think I, or any man, would want to work for you in the first place? In fact you are the perfect example of the type of person I would never work for - a quirreling, whiney little female.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 11:02 AM
-2

As Oscar Wilde once said: "bigamy is the practice of having one wife too many, same as monogamy". I would never trust a woman to give her the time of day, let alone half of my income and assets for the rest of my life. My advice to men now - use women as you see fit, sleep with them, but never, ever live with or marry them. You do not need a woman. Ever.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 09:11 PM
7

The Argentines invaded first. The Falklanders DO NOT want to be governed by Argentina. Thatcher did not "start" the Falklands War, the UK liberated sovereign territory occupied by a foreign power.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 08:16 PM
14

What do you expect? Even your favourite female MRA has admitted it's women, not men, who have the innate group preference ie women are sexist, not men. So of course there'll be an outcry, then there'll be an appeal, then the "right" ruling will be made and the judge who made the original ruling will be hanged from a sour apple tree. If women ran the world sexism against men would be the default setting. And don't expect dissenting voices like this little subreddit to be tolerated for long...
/r/MensRights14/09/12 01:45 PM
-2

I stand by my comment. Men produce, women consume. Ergo women are a waste. Truth.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 12:25 PM
2

Well, you may never have heard of him before, but you sure do now. mission accomplished
/r/MensRights29/08/12 06:38 AM
9

By all accounts an uncircumcised penis when erect looks pretty much the same as a cut penis when erect, so I don't know what she's complaining about anyway. Neither the male nor female genitals are particularly attractive, so it seems pretty dumb to complain about the aesthetics of penises.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 08:49 PM
0

GirlWritesWhat is a symbol of the problem men face - it takes a woman to advocate for men's rights because nobody would listen to a man advocating for men's rights. GWW is lauded because she is a woman. Do you think anyone would take her seriously if she was a man? No. She'd be another pale male, basement dweller with a small dick etc etc. But the fact she is a woman means we must take her seriously right? Right?!? Quite frankly I don't need GWW to advocate for me, it's all of you I'm worried ab…
/r/MensRights26/08/12 02:11 AM
2

Yes. What can count as sarcasm here counts as hard fact in our woman dominated education system. In a decade or so Neil Armstrong will be just another DWEM who succeeded at the expense of a more deserving woman. /deadly serious
/r/MensRights26/08/12 02:01 AM
3

How is it unhealthy? Will this person get fired from his job for this? No. Will he suffer the same fate as Larry Summers? Err... no. He'll be lauded among the liberal circle-jerk, and the cliterati will love him even more. Far from being unhealthy, his is a very healthy and wise attitude to take. Now ask why, in the context of current attitudes towards men.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 01:51 AM
1

Don't need to imagine that. Nazis + jews = final solution. Feminism + men = ???
/r/MensRights26/08/12 01:45 AM
1

If this stuff didn't sell you wouldn't be reading it now. Now ask yourself, who controls 75% plus of all discretionary spending in the US? Martians, or the flying spaghetti monster... Oh, it's women.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 01:44 AM
4

Behold the white knight in all his glory. "Yah all men are bastards, but don't hate on me girls. I'm different, because I respect women..."
/r/MensRights26/08/12 01:36 AM
2

"The majority of women"? The majority of women who will vote for your President Obama this November, to take advantage of the paid-for freebies he'll dangle under their noses? The same majority of women who will divorce their husbands at sone stage, and go on to enjoy the benefits of feminist divorce laws. Or perhaps the majority of women who will laugh at a male victim of DV, or pour scorn on boys raped by their teacher? The "majority of women" you claim to know so well are indistinguishable fr…
/r/MensRights26/08/12 01:32 AM
-3

Why do you feel the need to justify yourself to feminists? Feminism (and women as a whole) are the problem; this whole OP reeks of white knighting of the worst kind, the type of which would not exist if it weren't for women and feminism. By trying to shift the blame onto me you are doing women's job for them. If you hadn't noticed this is a small corner of the interwebs. Feminism and its enablers occupy pretty much everywhere else. And grow up? That sounds like feminist shaming language. My feel…
/r/MensRights26/08/12 01:27 AM
-3

And this is why I thoroughly, utterly, completely loathe, loathe, loathe women. Written by a man it may be, this article speaks to women, and is all about women. The future may belong to women, but my heart and mind are my own. And I fucking loathe women. All women. And you feminists are welcome to quote me on that.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 09:10 PM
10

So men's humanity isn't enough; to be allowed to sit next to children there needs to be a persuasive argument to justify a man's rights - and that argument inevitably revolves around a man's utility to others. So this doesn't really change much at all, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:52 AM
1

Yes. Because definitions in law are never sexist. /s
/r/MensRights14/08/12 11:30 AM
1

That sounds.... agonising. That's the first I've heard of that. Does that happen often?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 11:25 AM
0

But this definition reflects cultural attitudes at large. Attitudes that are shaped by feminism. Same as attitudes to Domestic Violence.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 11:11 AM
2

Damned patriarchy!!
/r/MensRights13/08/12 10:22 AM
4

Probably. When the expected disasters didn't occur the producers were probably very disappointed. There's only been one series of TWTWW produced by the BBC in the UK; if the men had balled things up big time in series one TWTWW would probably be a regular programme on our screens in Britain...
/r/MensRights12/08/12 05:03 PM
3

From what I (vaguely, admittedly) recall of the original TWTWW on the BBC the men, barring some teething troubles got on just fine. Many of them got to do some new things they wouldn't have normally done, built closer relationships with their children, and generally felt a lot closer to the community in which they lived. Some of the men did feel they were being set up for a fall, and thought some of those involved in production and filming were hoping for some disastrous mishap to occur, but ove…
/r/MensRights12/08/12 04:45 PM
-2

I wish there was a place where I could get away from women. Having to sit next to them on the bus or train is a pain sometimes. And having to work alongside them, and having to listen to them in TV, or having to read about them in newspapers gets to me lately. Yep, it would be great to live a women-free existence without having to become a hermit. Perhaps more of these women-only cities should be built. Que the downvotes but that's just how I feel.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 09:51 PM
0

Inquisitive troll is inquisitive.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 11:24 AM
2

Unless they are from the US, where circumcision is still common practice - although getting less so thankfully.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 04:57 PM
24

He should check his privilege. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights10/08/12 04:49 PM
11

"women are always helpless victims with no agency". Yep. Because, like, patriarchy. Or something. Funny isn't it though. Many in the MRM credit women with large amounts of power and influence, and give women respect (or recognition) for their ability to look out for their own interests. Feminists, however, assert that women are helpless victims with no influence or control over their own lives. Makes you wonder who the bigger misogynists are sometimes...
/r/MensRights06/08/12 12:43 AM
8

Remember the only reason SRY-damaged foetuses develop as female is becquse of hormones from the mother. SRY is a switch that needs to turn on pretty quick, otherwise maternal hormones would effectively swamp the developing foetus and force it to become female. The discussion over what "template" developing babies will adopt has to be framed within the context of the mother's womb and biology; children don't develop in a vaccuum.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 11:25 AM
17

Feminist: "A pay gap relating to "choices" is still totally in need of remediation" You: "So I assume you are in favour of equal parenting legislation?" Feminist: "Err no, I didn't say that..."
/r/MensRights04/08/12 10:14 AM
3

I don't hate women, I'm just bored of them. And that website? "Adverts that hate women"? Probably the few ads that don't portray men as morons.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 10:21 PM
2

That is also oppressive though. Some feminist women complain about having to make all the running in their relationships, and that leaves them feeling exhausted, which leaves them feeling oppressed. So yeah, doing what a woman wants you to do is also a form of oppression - according to feminism at least...
/r/MensRights28/07/12 01:04 PM
12

Maybe it's simply "all men are rapists, even if they never actually rape anyone..."
/r/MensRights28/07/12 12:38 PM
1

Man Going His Own Way. That means spurning relationships with women, and doing what I enjoy doing instead. Life long bachelorhood basically.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 12:49 PM
1

Never happen. I'm an MGHOW; I will never have children.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 12:23 PM
0

No. Men need to look after their own. Leave the modern independent women to themselves.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 10:59 AM
2

Well I can assure all you feminists out there I will never bother to protect a woman. Ever. No woman is worth sacrificing my life over.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 12:54 AM
1

It's funny 'cos it's true.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 12:41 AM
5

Not to split hairs, but isn't there a difference between spree killers (like with this latest tragedy) and serial killers who tend to murder over a period of weeks to years or more? I agree with the point though - men do not have a monopoly on murder.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 09:01 PM
2

The word "penis" has been said on tv in the UK plenty of times. America probably has different rules on the matter.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 03:02 PM
8

AVfM were at the forefront of efforts to get that hate-filled shit "blog" exposed for what it was, but there is no reason to say they subjected her to a witch hunt. They aren't responsible for the actions of every member of the MRM. AVfM merely called her out on what she said - how is that wrong? Remember her politics (if indeed she was the author of the blog) were some of the most vile things I've seen online. If she has killed herself then of course it's a pity - not least for that poor daught…
/r/MensRights24/07/12 02:38 PM
1

I wouldn't worry. I doubt there are any here who would hold up these killers as examples of "typical women", what is interesting is I'd never heard of most of them... EDIT I have heard of Elizabeth Báthory, and Mrs. Stysinski but not any of the others.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 02:18 PM
7

Probably right, but it's probably fair to say if anyone - man or woman - said something along the lines of "men are better at some things, women are better at others" they'd be decried as a misogynist. Nobody would object to the idea of women being better at certain tasks, but for men to be better at other things... well that would be a very controversial thing to say.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 10:05 AM
8

"I believe that women are just as capable, if not more so in a lot of different dimensions..." And it's quotes like that which mean I can never take some women seriously. Even if they don't identify as "feminists" they still buy into the supremacist mindset. So she says she's not a feminist, but I say if it walks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck...
/r/MensRights24/07/12 09:51 AM
4

From the article: "All IQ tests are thoroughly tested and adjusted for bias, so if anything IQ tests are biased in favour of women not men." I wonder how things would pan out if the tests weren't biased ( as he puts it) towards females..?
/r/MensRights22/07/12 10:24 PM
2

So let me get this straight. The study that has been bandied around the news media as "proof" that women are smarter than men is a study of 14-18 yos, NOT of adults? Unbelievable. And what's more, in the one age range (16-18yo) that anyone could even begin to describe as "adult" (and even that's a stretch) the men (boys) still scored higher. So enlighten me. How did this even get reported (or should I say spun) as a proof that women are smarter than men?
/r/MensRights22/07/12 10:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter