TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mrmensplights Archive

View 0 posts and 2,057 comments by mrmensplights on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,057 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Trained their wholes lives to see women as victims who had nothing and men as oppressors who have it all and to make this part of their identity to the point where any information contrary generates an immediate feeling of anger, and where any discussion of men struggling is an affront where the powerful are seeking to help themselves at the expense of the weak. You could expand your query to a more general case. Why do some women become so hostile and dismissive in any instance where men are sa…
/r/MensRights26/07/26 07:36 PM
2

LLMs are trained on huge amounts of real world data. Therefore it's more likely to be biased in favor of women while also expressing misandry. However, an LLM in this state is practically schizophrenic. Given the right prompt it might even start expressing sentiments found on this subreddit. (Wouldn't that be a travesty for corporate society?) Instead, AI companies put the models through several additional layers of supervised and unsupervised training methods in order to normalize to a specific…
/r/MensRights26/07/26 06:54 PM
70

This article takes an almost celebratory take on divorces of these kind. Framing it as 'freedom' in the headline, and mirroring hallow self-help language in the body with phases like 'finding oneself and 'vibrant new beginnings'. They are literally selling it as a lifestyle upgrade. In reality, studies on gray divorce in East Asia show that women experience an average 45% drop in their standard of living. Dividing a household in two doubles living costs but halves shared retirement savings. Even…
/r/MensRights26/07/26 06:42 PM
2

One interesting thing is that this image approximately demonstrates the "history" of how the word rape has been used over time. Initially rape meant only the most extreme cases, but because the word evoked such a visceral response in people activists, politicians, and other interests began expanding it and using it for more and more things. Many uses today have become absurd beyond all measure but female privilege and the feminist lobby have such power they can keep cramming new things in there.…
/r/MensRights26/07/26 06:11 PM
14

all white men go stand at the back of the bus. "We do not see enough grounds to believe that there was discrimination based on skin color or gender." Hmm. Feel free to swap out genders and skin colors in the above and see if you truly feel the government would still have no problem with it.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 09:53 PM
2

First of all, define feminine man. That's a wide spectrum because many women and feminists will label all sorts of behaviors that are actually totally common for all men as feminine in an attempt to circumscribe masculinity as only including traits which serves their interests. Beyond that you are looking at lots of subcultures and groups. Do you mean femboys, drag, andro, cross-dresses, flamboyant mannerisms, or simply a keen interest in fashion or style? If that case the answer is: no. Hatred …
/r/MensRights25/07/26 05:09 PM
27

Article isn't totally clear so should be noted that the NATO commitments only require them to increase their force to 260,000 by the mid 2030s. The 20% target for female personnel is all Germany - not a rule mandated by NATO.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 04:00 PM
1

Amazing job. A positive direction for true equality. The time is long past where anyone can justify boys being railroaded so that girls can have special advantages.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 03:59 PM
2

"Hatred of men at all time high; women most affected"
/r/MensRights25/07/26 03:43 AM
1

Why do people still try to pretend feminism is "men are equal to women"? That is an egalitarian. No one buys that story about feminism anymore. It's clear that feminism is about securing special privileges for women. They aren't concerned with male issues and there's no defined finish line. Some justify this through patriarchy and the laughable assertion that women are still oppressed or have less rights or privileges than men. Anyway, here's an anecdote. Was shopping today and heard a radio com…
/r/MensRights25/07/26 03:36 AM
2

"All Gender Restroom" - formally just called a restroom - is usually just a single occupancy restroom that they often have add to meet regulations related to accessibility. Many buildings now have a single occupancy accessible restroom in addition to the men's and women's restrooms. If there is truly no male restroom then that is bizarre.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 03:28 AM
2

If you do something - like go to HR - then things might change. If you do nothing then nothing will change.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 03:23 AM
12

Any objective analysis of online culture will show rampant unrestrained misandry. Misogyny is a drop in the bucket by comparison. The internet is a reflection of the wider culture, and the wider cultural tacitly supports misandry. Our default gender narrative is now that boys are oppressive, that girls should catered to and validated, and that mistreating and scapegoating men is acceptable. Thus online there is no corrective mechanism. Unlike actual misogyny - which is moderated and controlled s…
/r/MensRights25/07/26 03:16 AM
2

In the US, women do make up the majority of white collar office workers (~54.5%). That is trending up and will likely continue to do so because white collar work is downstream of post secondary education women and now earn the majority of degrees at all levels, which is also roughly downstream for post secondary participation where women make up the majority of students (~60%). However, those are just aggregate numbers. There are some real gender divides when you break things down by occupation.…
/r/MensRights23/07/26 10:33 PM
1

Fair enough. For some more nuance: The study consisted of four experiments. The values d = 0.28 for men and d = 1.27 for women are averages of the four Cohen's d effect sizes. Women showed consistently large implicit pro-female effects across all four experiments. Men showed statistically significant implicit pro-male effects in two of the four experiments: one moderate effect (d = 0.55) and one small effect (d = 0.31). The other two male effects-d = 0.24 and d = 0.03-were not statistically sign…
/r/MensRights23/07/26 04:09 AM
3

According to the study I was reading that isn't true. This research found that while both women and men have more favorable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger[5] than those of men. Furthermore, only women (not men) showed cognitive balance among in-group bias, identity, and self-esteem, revealing that men lack a mechanism that bolsters automatic preference for their own gender.[5] In summary: Women showed a strong implicit in-group bias (they automatically preferred …
/r/MensRights22/07/26 06:45 PM
67

You have to remember that studies show women's in-group bias are 4.5x stronger than that of men, and that men show no in-group bias. Think about how lopsided that number is. Society reinforces and validates this bias every step of the way. So yes, unless faced with overwhelming evidence or some overt conscious reason to do otherwise, women will just side with women.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 01:05 AM
6

Always was.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 10:37 PM
30

It's a illogical and statistically illiterate piece of rhetoric. It'll never go away because they've been using irrational, statistically illiterate, illogical, rhetoric with cherry picked data forever and no one ever asks anything more of them. No on is going to challenge them as long as the target is men. They may even know that it's not a useful statement, but it doesn't matter. They aren't interested in making the world a better place or helping women, they just want to disparage men and hur…
/r/MensRights20/07/26 05:39 PM
2

As a man, my experience with men has almost nothing in common with yours at all. I don't know what kind of hell-scape you grew up in, but it's not one I or any man I personally know every lived in. most benign daily interactions are often turned into a one-sided pissing contest you have no way out of. Every conversation is a challenge, every group project is a duel, god forbid you need something from a man you don’t know, the horror. Not what the data shows either. There is a substantial body of…
/r/MensRights20/07/26 04:37 AM
2

Is it any better out there? You cheated as well dude. No matter where you go, there you are. Your situation is your own and you gotta figure it out. Only you have all the information. It sounds to me like you are already 'open' - just with extra steps - so unless you guys get off on fighting you may as well go open or go single. Just don't drag other people into this under false pretenses.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 03:50 PM
1

The humanities disciplines (literary theory, sociology, or cultural studies, etc) adopted a dense, jargon-heavy, pseudo-scientific frameworks in an attempt to project the same aura of objective, rigorous, and "universal" truth that hard sciences like physics, chemistry, and biology command. It's just mimicry. A cargo cult desperately presenting something in the aesthetic shape of technical language in hopes of capturing its power. Even if you go out of your way to methodically steel man their ar…
/r/MensRights19/07/26 05:21 AM
3

The average person is hostile to men's rights. The very notion of discussing men's issues is offensive to many. None of the data supports their position and yet it doesn't matter to them or anyone. The good news is that you don't need to save anyone. You don't need to make them understand. Your first responsibility is to yourself and your well being and to that of the people you love. I firmly believe the MRM has made incredible progress in providing truth, data, and knowledge for those men who …
/r/MensRights18/07/26 10:25 PM
51

There is no intellectual defense of legislation like this that doesn't simply admit that women and men are two tribes and one is more valuable than the other - a view that is at odds with reality.
/r/MensRights18/07/26 02:33 PM
2

For some strange reason most commenters can't seem to engage with ops thesis and instead rambling on about anecdotes. Truly bizarre.
/r/MensRights18/07/26 08:06 AM
37

It's what they call a man who doesn't get on his knees and serve in an attempt to shame him, control him, or set an example for other men. To many women the perfect man is the servant; providing security, income, and labor in a transactional exchange. They see a man playing a video game or engaging in a hobby, and they are enraged by his lack of utilization towards their end. Such men are then called "man child" by the woman. Women who have a healthy mindset towards relationships and men do not …
/r/MensRights16/07/26 11:11 PM
2

Such an ardent feminist that he finds the idea of a female character that is a mastermind, highly intelligent, politically savvy, and who displays the full flower of human emotions to be a revolting concept. Such an ardent feminist he can only allow female characters to exist if they fall within a spectrum of behavior he deems appropriate for the fairer sex. It reminds me when women were told "Politics is too dirty for women to be involved in" when women were seeking the right to vote. The funny…
/r/MensRights16/07/26 11:06 PM
3

Very few people have the rectitude to denounce a contradiction that directly benefits them. As it stands, women get to have their cake and eat it too: They benefit from benevolent sexism while also enjoying the freedom and autonomy afforded those in equal society. Feminism is not out for equality. It's a movement ultimately based on privilege seeking, and they rely on benevolent sexism to secure those privileges and always have.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 10:56 PM
5

Here's the real problem: Feminists and mainstream society have created a monster that only exists in their own minds and called it the manosphere. However, it doesn't matter if it's real - only if they believe it is. If you stare into the abyss long enough the abyss stares back into you; this the femosphere is born. A truly monstrous thing that actually exists, created by people who traumatized themselves over a boogeyman they themselves created. This is the cost of a mainstream socially accepta…
/r/MensRights16/07/26 10:34 PM
4

Feminism was always a movement focused on giving women privileges. It's right there in black and white in the literature; equality is achieved by giving women advantages. In other words, the movement has "co-opted" equality - corrupted it - and repurposed it towards making sure women have more privilege. They were never going to address any issues related to men. They were always going to work to make women have less responsibility and more freedom, and if that comes at the expense of men then s…
/r/MensRights11/07/26 09:41 PM
3

So, you got nothing? In that case I won't respond further. You've made yourself irrelevant now, and I'm quite comfortable that anyone reading this thread also make that determination.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 03:37 AM
4

The only thing that could be called "systemic rape" in our society is prison rape. A practice that is jokes about in wider culture, and tolerated and silently condoned within prisons. Despite no explicit rules, staff fail to intervene, reports of sexual assault get ignored, dismissed, and inadequately investigated, and there are documented cases of correctional officers facilitating assaults. It's kind of a double slap in the face; First because there is no part of the cultural that can be said …
/r/MensRights11/07/26 03:32 AM
5

Dude, do you really need this in your life? You have no obligation to remain friends. Friendship is opt-in. You're basically saying "I have a duty to be abused by a girl forever because I was rejected by her one time years ago". This is a toxic relationship that is causing you distress and it's been this way for years. And now you know that it can also be dangerous to you. She's willing to lie and ruin your reputation so she comes out clean. Time to go your own way. You don't need to confront he…
/r/MensRights11/07/26 03:22 AM
35

Canada and Australia are remarkably similar in so many ways. Structurally, economically, and definitely in terms of misandry. Maybe it's a commonwealth thing, because the UK is a shithole for men too.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 03:08 AM
2

Yawn. Does this kind of boring rhetoric usually work for you? We aren't in your struggle session right now, you'll actually have to bring something to the table beyond performative anger, loaded questions, and a straw man.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 02:58 AM
2

The people who say this to indicate men have some sort of evil nature or there needs to be special rules simply don't know math. If 90% of people who commit violent crimes are men, but there an incredible small amount of men commit violent crimes, then the chance of any given man committing a violent crime is incredibly small. They are parading around the numerator and ignoring the denoninator, but you need the whole fraction to understand actual risk. In reality, gender is a poor predictor of v…
/r/MensRights10/07/26 04:03 AM
10

I don't really think Bear is a monster. He's not even a villain. He's just a weak, pitiable, and tragic character. It's kind of a simplistic interpretation to look for villains and victims in everything.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 04:04 AM
12

They are very open about it unless you are actually discussing it with them. If it's incidental to the topic - like it's just a group discussing any random topic - they will casually say the most hateful shit about men. It's only when actually discussing the topic or being challenged they switch to the rhetorical mode of reflect, deflect, project, lie, cheat, etc.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 03:50 AM
2

Always the asides about women. It also loves to create false dichotomies - massively distorting issues that men face by cherry picking or inventing points so it looks like things are balanced. I just looked up victims of violent crime, which are overwhelmingly male. It cherry picked 9 categories: 4 for where men are more likely to be the victim and 5 where women are. It omits all frequency data. This creates the false impression that "things are balanced, but women have it a little worse" which …
/r/MensRights07/07/26 04:48 AM
4

Why shouldn't we discriminate against men based on this? As others have said; most violence is done by men, but most men are not violent. Gender is a poor predictor of violence. People hear 90% and it sounds like a lot until you realize they are ignoring the denominator. This is the base rate fallacy. Real world probability has to factor in how many men commit violence - not just composition of a crime - and that amount is very low. In real world terms there is no reason to believe any given man…
/r/MensRights06/07/26 08:29 PM
2

You have my sympathy. That long haul is out of my wheelhouse but I wish you the best. You said you can't communicate or she doesn't care. Project where you are at now five years, ten years, twenty years, thirty years into the future. Is your happiness something you are willing to sacrifice? You deserve to be happy. I hope it works out. Take care
/r/MensRights06/07/26 03:21 AM
13

On the Yom Kippur, according to Book of Leviticus, two goats were selected. One was sacrificed. The other had the sins of the community symbolically placed upon it before being driven into the wilderness. The important thing isn't whether the goat "really" had the sins. The ritual externalizes guilt. The community becomes purified by relocating its corruption elsewhere. Mary Douglas, in Purity and Danger, argues that ideas of purity are really systems of classification. Societies define themselv…
/r/MensRights05/07/26 07:06 PM
18

It's just a myth that men don't process emotions. What people who say this in a derogatory way usually mean is that men should process their emotions more like women do. This is just one facet of a far larger issue where many groups in society treat men as "defective women". Female behavior is the gold standard, and men are seen as deficient to the degree that they deviate from it. men today are too emotional [...] crying One side says cry more, the other says cry less. The common thread is that…
/r/MensRights05/07/26 06:22 PM
2

One of the scary things about identity politics and grievance narratives is that you start to read victimhood into every ambiguity. Feminists are absolutely obsessed with this and have little memes about doctors visits that the data doesn't support. However, from a strategic point of view healthcare is concerning from a male perspective. The field is becoming majority female and ideologically captured. Most new funding is going towards "FemTech" (focus on women's health) and women's hospitals et…
/r/MensRights05/07/26 03:27 AM
11

It can be a kind of slapstick comedy and from that perspective it is whatever if not tasteless. However, these days more often it's gendered violence. It's done in context of a woman and a man - either she does it or he suffers it on her behalf - and played for laughs on that basis. That is wrong.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 11:00 PM
2

Spain is one the most socially repressive backwater hells when it comes to men's rights. As is evidenced by this post, the government is explicitly and unabashedly anti-male. Imagine you are a man who owns a home. A woman you are seeing moves in. One night she beats you over the head with a blunt object. The police are called. You are bleeding and bruised and she has no marks at all. What happens? In Spain: You can get arrested for up to 3 days You can be evicted from your home., Protection orde…
/r/MensRights04/07/26 10:27 PM
3

It really is relentless, wide spread, and totally sanctioned by social media sites. The double standard is very frustrating.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 09:40 PM
1

I think there's truth to that. White guilt and identity politics have helped shape the conversation. But I also think it's a mistake to dismiss the real disparities Black men face. The data shows that Black men are stopped, questioned, frisked, and arrested at higher rates than would be expected based on measured offending alone. They're also more likely to face charges carrying mandatory minimums, and studies have found that they receive longer sentences (13-19%) even after accounting for facto…
/r/MensRights04/07/26 05:37 PM
2

You know their case is flimsy when they admit most men don't fit a word they themselves made up to demonize men.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 04:42 PM
2

Nice post, good information and agree. The only problem is the audience: We don't do that. The people who do that are the same people who call MRM incels and misogynists. It's convenient to diffuse these things together if you hate men. In discussions involving unengaged people you can treat this as all one big nebulous thing that's bad. In rhetoric against the MRM you can take any animosity and negative stories from those other groups and project them. It becomes a straw man. You can hate or be…
/r/MensRights03/07/26 03:01 AM
2

Example.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 02:54 AM
6

The only mfs who do are incels First, don't spread that incel shit. It's lost all meaning and is simply a bludgeon used indiscriminately against men who speaks up for themselves. Second, you're in a subreddit right now that talks about these issues. Are you implying MRM are incels? If so there's there's the door. This is an issue of patriarchy and inequality, fixed with feminism, TRUE FEMINISM! No true scotsman fallacy. The core principal of feminism is patriarchy. Men are privileged, men are op…
/r/MensRights03/07/26 12:05 AM
2

I didn’t assert anything so what are you even talking about
/r/MensRights02/07/26 06:59 PM
18

You asked for examples, and you got 'em. End of story. Stop moving the goalposts, deflecting, downplaying, spinning, and transmuting to try to make the facts fit your existing bias and just accept the new information.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 04:26 AM
13

Psychology Today using every credential to push forward an ideological agenda - per usual. Psychology as a field has been ideological captured for some time now. Everything he cites has been debunked, but he just keeps on stream rolling and those who are inclined will eat it up. He betrays boys and men but increases his chance of a book deal. Human garbage.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 06:17 PM
4

I don't know what jurisdiction you are in, but there are often many legal loopholes that companies use in order to discriminate against men. In many jurisdictions there are laws that can create exceptions if you are discriminating in favor of "historically disadvantaged groups". e.g.; In the west and in these places you can simply go ahead and discriminate against men or white men. Targeted Recruiting is a loophole often used. If they say "Men not welcome" then it could be illegal, but if they s…
/r/MensRights01/07/26 06:10 PM
1

If she yells at you again go to HR. If she swears again go to HR. Her complaints against you being taken seriously also legitimizes your complaint against her for same. It may be that you are in a no-win situation. After all, if she were a man she would already be fired. She doubled down on her female privilege by saying the magical word "uncomfortable". HR departments are often anti-male with every single bit of autonomy they are given. Document everything. All communication in writing and if s…
/r/MensRights01/07/26 05:57 PM
2

Another Gillette. This time from a clothing company. ‘Men in Progress’ [a marketing campaign] aims to detoxify [...] masculinity I'm all for expanding the definition of masculinity, but the video falls into demonizing and idealizing specific behaviour and falls into the tired old trope of "Men are defective women": Anything stereotypically masculine is portrayed as toxic, while "progressive men" are defined positively as embracing feminine stereotypes, hobbies, and pursuits. If they want to make…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 12:44 AM
2

I wonder whether it is fair to say that feminists unconsciously expect men to be omniscient? No, they expect that they aren't. Once you understand the full implications of that you'll understand feminism much better.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 10:07 PM
1

It also doesn't matter. That isn't how abuse works anyway. You don't need to be stronger to sucker punch someone, or to throw a glass or rock at someone's head, to cut someone with a knife or threaten them with a gun, or smash them in the face when they are asleep, or put poisonous chemicals in their coffee. Especially when it can ruin your life if you fight back. You also don't need to be physically stronger to threaten self harm if they don't obey or leave, or to call police and claim a man is…
/r/MensRights28/06/26 07:57 AM
8

Have to be careful. Life can be ruined at any moment by a woman for any reason. The state exists to enforce their will. To be a man is to wear a mask. All male spaces where we could be ourselves have been systematically eliminated. Men who support other men are considered dangerous. Despite what is said, men who open up and express themselves are also considered dangerous. Opening up often also makes women in our lives uncomfortable unless it's purely positive and validating. Men can only open u…
/r/MensRights28/06/26 07:41 AM
5

Feminists continually assault "women and children first". Endless videos and diatribes about how it never really existed, isn't human nature, and that in reality men brawled their way to the front of the line every time. Yet in our own time we see men deprioritized in every disaster, in every rescue, in every war. All we've done was take the chivalry that centered women and turn it into the rule of law.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 10:05 PM
1

Is women getting murdered worse than men getting murdered? Yes. This is very literally what they believe. If an equal and fair society wanted to treat homicide with a gendered element in a special way it would be written in gender neutral terms and added as an consideration under homicide legislation. e.g.; "Was the victims gender an important aspect in this homicide?" This law would naturally cover gendered violence in proportion to it's existence and therefore achieves the 'stated aims' of act…
/r/MensRights27/06/26 07:14 PM
7

In real-world terms, in terms of absolute risk, most women are unlikely to experience violence from a man. Let's say this is true: "Most violence comes from men". Guess what else is true? This one: "Most men never commit violence." I know statistics is really hard for some people, but even if "Most violence is done by men" is true that does not make gender a strong predictor for violence due to the base rate. For example, if 95% of people who have a rare disease have brown eyes, but billions of …
/r/MensRights27/06/26 05:14 PM
1

I suggest you take a math class if you intend to wield statistics or logic. The only one twisting reality is you. While you're at it, take a few English classes too, because your reading comprehension is clearly abysmal.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 04:40 AM
28

The entire idea of viewing men and women as separate groups and focusing which does more violence to the other is just pointless gender war. It's not useful, it's not meaningful, it lacks nuance, it's not actionable. It's the strategy of someone so captured ideologically that they are more interested in putting points on an ideological scoreboard than achieving anything productive. Here's some flaws in this way of thinking: Violence is an individual behavior, not a collective trait. The vast ove…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 03:12 AM
52

Your making a mistake here. To people like this words are just weapons. She isn't arguing in good faith. See how she has you on the back foot defending yourself by making baseless accusations? You're falling into a trap. Dude she even said "Trash like you" why are you taking her points seriously and defending each one in her eyes? Listen: This is the internet. You don't need to convince her, you just need to convince the audience. Stop being reactive; She is shooting arrows and you moving to ens…
/r/MensRights22/06/26 02:20 PM
1

Title is hyperbolic like an headline but there's no article. Is there something specific you wanted to explore?
/r/MensRights21/06/26 08:04 PM
5

What amazing arguments you've presented here. Reciting the dogma someone else wrote for you and then slinging mud when challenged. Question: Have you ever used your own brain before?
/r/MensRights21/06/26 05:42 PM
3

For years before LLMs existed government and corporations tried to deploy AIs based on forward neural nets to do this kind of work and every time the AI would pick up on all the "wrong" kinds of patterns in all sorts of data. Time and again the programs would be shuttered for perceived racism or sexism, and eventually a body of work and even an industry of grifters formed around AI fairness. LLMs are actually far worse at this kind of work than the older tech, but the grifters were very ready to…
/r/MensRights21/06/26 01:40 AM
3

Guys, this comment is satire. He's either parodying or copy/pasted an LLM response.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 01:34 AM
1

Obviously it would be very wise to stop drinking entirely until the situation is resolved, but there's really no laying low as you suggest. He was arrested. There is a no contact order. He needs a lawyer and his life is massively disrupted. There's no three months. Best case scenario his life is only fucked for three months. His wife did something that there is no coming back from. This thing is a life destroyer. This thing can leave you homeless, destitute, socially isolated, and possibly in pr…
/r/MensRights19/06/26 02:34 PM
2

It's a result of the "The opioid crisis", which was fueled by a medical and pharmaceutical system that aggressively expanded opioid prescribing despite ample evidence of addiction risks. Drug companies marketed opioids as safe for chronic pain, professional organizations encouraged doctors to treat pain more aggressively, and many physicians prescribed these drugs in large quantities. After addiction rates, overdose deaths, lawsuits, and public scrutiny exploded, the medical profession swung sha…
/r/MensRights19/06/26 02:18 PM
6

For young people, the income gap is negligible and young women now often out-earn young men. It's precisely because they have children - and often change careers - in their 30's that women as a group lose the lead that preferential treatment in post secondary education afforded them.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 04:53 AM
3

It seems the safer and more privileged women are in a place by the numbers, the more obsessed they become with their own oppression narratively and the more likely they are to spread hate for men. Of course, women are incredibly safe and privileged as a group in Australia.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 03:06 AM
2

Jesus that is not subtle. Unhinged open hateful screed from a news brand. Do they know they aren't just some rando on social media?
/r/MensRights16/06/26 03:02 AM
10

You seem confused. The context here is "Why would someone downvote Enough-Business-8287's comment" and not what OP wrote. You claimed the only reason someone would downvote that comment is because they hate women. I pointed out that interpreting incomplete information in such a way that confirms your own bias and dismisses those you disagree with as misogynists is ultimately self serving and closed minded.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 03:16 PM
15

"If you disagree with me then you are a bad person" What a wonderfully self-validating worldview you've developed.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 01:52 PM
19

men in general aren't monsters [...] I don't hate men You sound remarkably like you do hate men - in general.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 01:33 PM
8

If they have a son, or if they have a male family member who is a victim of the inequality in society they often come around. Until then they just have no reason to question the misandrist mainstream societal narrative they were socialized into or question all the inequalities they benefit from. This is made even more difficult by women's in-group bias, the explicit misandry in the culture of young western women, and sexual dynamics. If you're asking is there a place or culture where the mainstr…
/r/MensRights11/06/26 12:49 PM
3

They are all bad but ChatGPT is one of the worst. Dystopian "Harm reduction" is known part of the instruction set. It will always weasel in "the message" when discussing women and men.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 04:52 AM
1

My point is that even if it were true, the issue men's rights issue shouldn't be macros at soup kitchens, but rather homelessness in the first place. Homelessness is the gendered issue that impacts men. Soup kitchens are downstream of that.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 02:08 AM
2

If you get enough calories than it doesn't matter that other people get more. So for trains, airplanes, and hospitals differences in caloric needs doesn't really matter. However, for services like soup kitchens for homeless where there's competition to get in and you need to load as many calories as you can whenever you get an opportunity due to food scarcity it likely underserves people with higher caloric needs. However, in these situations I would say the real framing is not caloric, but inst…
/r/MensRights08/06/26 06:02 PM
5

Incel is so telling. These people will yammer on about toxic masculinity yet their sickest burn is to attempt to degrade you by saying you can't get laid.
/r/MensRights06/06/26 10:17 PM
2

Systemic. As in relating to the whole system. Boys have worse outcomes in grade school, secondary schools. They face a system focused on girls success despite girls already having better outcomes, end up over medicated, have almost no mentors, have no special programs for them, and face a system with a demonstrated bias against them. Young men have less scholarships are harder admission criteria for post-secondary education despite make up a minority. Young men have worse outcomes in post second…
/r/MensRights06/06/26 09:58 PM
14

I volunteer Johan Forssell for the meat grinder. Yet somehow I'm sure he accepts Ukrainian women as refugees with open arms.It would seem that in service of homeland, Ukrainian men owe suffering, a lifetime of mental and physical trauma, and their very lives to duty - while Ukrainian women owe nothing.
/r/MensRights06/06/26 09:19 PM
26

"Contradictions do not exist. Whenever you think that you are facing a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong." The premise you have wrong is assuming feminists are good faith actors practicing what they believe is coherent ideology and open to debate. They aren't. To them words are just weapons. Everything they say is rhetoric. They use shocking words that bypass reason to deliver their payload and win points, they use dismissive words when they know they ar…
/r/MensRights04/06/26 02:48 AM
6

The anti-male bias in LLMs can only have two sources: From the training data or from policies by the company who lead additional supervised and unsupervised training on LLMs. Either source is proof of an anti-male bias in wider society.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 02:24 AM
2

Regardless of whether you are a person who believes respect is earned, or a person who respect everyone, respect is never something that should be automatic based contingent on an identity marker like gender.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 02:22 AM
13

To engage in identity politics is, by definition, to generalize people based on identity.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 02:38 AM
6

If you have an issue where your cramps are particularly bad then it seems like you could go through the normal accommodation process offered under existing employment laws in most jurisdictions. Unsure why this needs to be a federal program. They are just pandering to their base.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 05:47 PM
13

That's amazing news. While the bias against boys is proven, it's also averaged out at a population level. I'm glad the teacher your son has now is one of the good ones. Vigilance is the key. Don't expect bad outcomes but watch out for them. Even good unbiased teachers can't avoid teaching concepts that are inherently anti-male yet part of the curriculum.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 08:08 AM
17

Young men are in crisis. While the left tells men to stay in their lane, members of the manosphere and the far right are welcoming them with open arms Right there in the opening text: Their issue is not that young men are crisis, but instead that the wrong political side is putting putting points on the scoreboard. I think the reality is that we’ve always had patriarchy at the intersection of capitalism and white supremacy, and how those things feast on one another and lift one another. But I th…
/r/MensRights31/05/26 07:56 AM
1

If you're saying that testosterone alone cannot explain human behavior, then I completely agree. Human behavior emerges from a complex set of physical processes, of which testosterone is only one factor. That said, testosterone is still an interesting variable to study when when discussing average differences between men and women, since men generally have much higher levels of it. The fact that testosterone is not a complete explanation for behavior does not mean it has no explanatory value at …
/r/MensRights31/05/26 02:35 AM
4

This all goes back to misandry: Or the total and complete lack of consideration for men. People don't work just to be nodes in an economic graph or cogs in a machine. Work is part of the narrative structure of ones life: It has to mean something. What do men want? They want to be able to build something, support others, have a home, expand a bit. They want to look at the horizon of their lives and see they made a difference in the world. Yet, in western society from the moment they step into gra…
/r/MensRights29/05/26 04:31 PM
36

If we live in a patriarchy, then why do we need a manosphere?
/r/MensRights21/05/26 01:45 AM
1

Nothing you said really addressed anything from my comment, nor was it very coherent but I'll reply to a few ideas which aren't just transcriptions from the feminist handbook. Men are more at risk walking at night from OTHER MEN. Women are at risk of being attacked by men not by other women. So you are cherry picking. This is you cherry picking. It does not matter that the attackers were male, the victimization and suffering is the same. You are so deep fried in gender war tribalism that you no …
/r/MensRights19/05/26 07:06 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 02:57 AM
1

Very common refrain, sadly. None of their rhetoric is backed up with any facts. Their argument is "Misandry isn't as bad as misogyny because it isn't" followed by a bunch of blind assertions. "Misogyny is much worse but misandry still a problem". These kinds of statements are funny because they expose the contradiction. The writer only feels compelled to qualify misandry in relation to misogyny because of the privileged position of misogyny and women, which actually low key implies misandry is w…
/r/MensRights17/05/26 04:59 PM
6

Many men in this sub have internalized feminist narratives about male behaviors to the point that they take it as an axiom such behaviors are bad and spend their time proving that stereotypical male behaviors are somehow not true. They are ashamed and want to prove that men are more like women after all, which their internalized beliefs say is "good". For example, from the comments: The "terrible" testosterone myth busted one more time. How long until this message gets through to the social scie…
/r/MensRights16/05/26 05:54 PM
8

Will never forgive the articles about how women in Ukraine most affected because with all the men dead and maimed women can't go on dates as easily.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 02:50 PM
2

Where in my statement did I make any claim whatsoever on victim mentality?
/r/MensRights12/05/26 03:51 AM
3

Are you claiming that saying it's public or widespread exaggeration? The hashtags are real and trended #1 on Twitter and social media. The Guardian is a major and respected paper that really does have an editorial policy and point of view that is generally critical of men in it's articles. You yourself cite TikTok - the 4th/5th largest social media site on the internet - as being "taken over by the femosphere". TikTok certainly isn't alone in this regard today. So, which is it? You can't have it…
/r/MensRights11/05/26 11:39 PM
5

Dark corner? Is it a dark corner when it's a default type of content on the front most public pages of all social media apps? When hashtags like #killallmen, #menaretrash, #maletears, #mansplaining, #menarescrum trend #1 on these sites is is that a dark corner? What about when The Guardian itself framed this exact misandry as "justified expressions of frustration" rather than hate while writing countless anti-male articles and platforming these hatemongers for over fifteen years? Is the Guardian…
/r/MensRights11/05/26 02:06 PM
3

The stats are pretty clear. Men are much more likely to be a victim of almost all types of violent crime. Women are more likely to be a victim of sexual crimes but those numbers are much lower than for other types of violent crime and muddied further by those systems being designed for women and male victims not being taken seriously. The truth is that it's far less safe to be a man. Feminists love to jot out the "walking at night" - it's far less safe to walk alone at night as a man. A lot of t…
/r/MensRights10/05/26 04:06 PM
6

Broadly speaking, across evolutionary psychology and attractiveness research, men on average show the strongest physical attraction to women in roughly the early-to-mid 20s, and many traits commonly rated as attractive are associated with cues of fertility, health, youth, and reproductive maturity. Additionally, sexually dimorphic traits tend to be perceived as attractive in the opposite direction by each sex. For example, men generally prefer women who are shorter, smaller-framed, more feminine…
/r/MensRights10/05/26 02:53 AM
1

It’s just pure scientific fact. Very easy to look up. Simple to verify. Women have mechanisms that promote emotional crying, but for now let’s just focus on the male picture. Crying is closely linked to prolactin, a hormone found in higher concentrations in women. Testosterone tends to keep prolactin levels lower, making the physical act of shedding tears more difficult. Research suggests that high levels of androgens (like testosterone) physically affect the lacrimal glands, potentially reducin…
/r/MensRights05/05/26 06:40 PM
0

Which aspect is bullshit? Nothing you wrote disagrees with what I wrote. The phrase “Men are not defective women” is a concept often used in social commentary to push back against the idea that female-typical behaviors (like verbalizing emotions) are the "correct" standard for being human. No one said men being saved or brought back to noble status. This is the point: Men do not behave and respond as women do. For example, emotional crying. Therefore if female behavior is considered correct then…
/r/MensRights05/05/26 06:23 AM
1

Where was the misandry?
/r/MensRights05/05/26 06:09 AM
0

If you downvote this kindly explain why. I want to know if y'all are so far gone you willfully reject reality and science, or if you're simply uneducated.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 10:07 PM
9

They go on about patriarchy, about how they don't need men to step in to a protector and provider role, about independence, and about not needing men - Yet, they demonize men for not stepping in to protect or sacrifice for them every single time. It's the same kind of video over and over. Men not giving up their seats, men not putting themselves in danger to protect women, men not sacrificing something to make life easier for a woman. And it's the same comment section over and over. Raging about…
/r/MensRights03/05/26 06:24 PM
-3

As a society we have developed this tendency to treat men as defective women. Treating stereotypical female behaviors as a gold standard. This permeates the culture and is especially rampant in fields like psychology. It's wrong and harmful. Testosterone inhibits emotional crying. Prolactin - which women have a lot more of - promotes emotional crying. Oxytocin and ACTH also play roles to the same effect. That's why men don't emotionally cry as much as women. Full stop. Men aren't broken or wrong…
/r/MensRights03/05/26 06:13 PM
2

Opposite is true. Feminists use identity politics and power dynamics to separate men and women into two separate tribes and then they spin narratives that scapegoat men and debase men. They construct anti-male narratives that have no basis in reality and feed them to women. They produce content that stokes flames of fear and anxiety and propagandize women into living in a cage and then blame men for it. The result is a generation of women with an artificially created yet very real hatred of men.…
/r/MensRights02/05/26 09:27 PM
14

Leaving the matrix means leaving lies and fantasies behind and moving ahead accepting reality for what it is. Whether you search for love or not afterwards is up to you.
/r/MensRights02/05/26 03:36 PM
17

You are going through something all men go through. When we are young we are fed an endless stream of propaganda about gender. That boys are aggressive, oppressive, brutish, dangerous. That girls are more nurturing, more empathic, that they are sweeter or kinder. We are even taught higher principals that women are more pacifist, abhor violence, are hurt emotionally by seeing violence. Media displays an endless litany of the cliche of boys fighting and girls screaming for them to stop. Of boys bu…
/r/MensRights02/05/26 03:35 PM
22

False allegations are common. Feminists will say "2-10%" of accusations are false hoping you'll assume 80-98% must then be true. In reality 2-10% are proven false, but the vast majority of accusations - 75-88% - are inconclusive. They are neither proven false nor true. However, one must consider what "inconclusive" really means. It means any case dropped due to insufficient evidence, any case where the victim withdrew the accusation, any case police considered baseless, weaponization during divo…
/r/MensRights02/05/26 02:14 PM
14

I've said it before and I'll say it again: The Male Loneliness Epidemic concept was originally about the loss of roles and spaces for men. It was not about relationships. Full stop. It's about the loss of respect for men in general as citizens and participants in culture. It's about the dismantling or reshaping of male spaces, male clubs, male groups. It's about all respected roles society once provided for men to fill being stripped away until only those that serve women remain: "provider", "pa…
/r/MensRights30/04/26 10:08 PM
6

If a man made that kind of statement people would be shocked. You really have to sit back and realize just how actually evil something like talking about how all men need to be castrated really is. The most vile misogyny online doesn't even come close to approaching the level of talking about physically torturing and mutilating all women.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 10:01 PM
6

Society condones and encourages hatred of men, and men who have lived with that their wholes lives get used to taking this kind of shit. In order to get past the conditioning put into racial terms. Imagine being black and out of nowhere your friend starts raging and dropping N bombs. Then they turn to you and say "Not you, BUT... all other black people" etc. You were right to be mortified. Unfortunately, I thing most women are now conditioned into hatred of men and to condone and encourage it as…
/r/MensRights30/04/26 09:59 PM
8

Is this just some rando? Anyway, just another damaged anti-male hate monger who is would rather project their hate and trauma on the rest of us instead of taking accountability for it. Sadly very common these days.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 03:23 AM
1

Not only that - it's been that way for actual decades.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 02:15 AM
-1

The most sacred belief and largest source of double think among the left is that of tabula rasa - the blank slate. To even discuss biological differences puts you in the danger zone and if those discussions cut against the leftist religious dogma around race or gender then it's taboo. Even tenured professors can't cancelled when they cross that line in what would otherwise be legitimate research. So yes, there are profound differences between men and women that extend far beyond physical appeara…
/r/MensRights14/04/26 04:06 AM
13

I agree with you, but that is also a matter of opinion. One can argue that mandatory military service or the draft have value to society or one can argue the opposite - that such requirements for citizens are a violation of our rights. Either way, gender equality would dictate is that women should be held to the same standard and responsibilities as men. I too hope for a world where the draft is abolished, but if society decides it's a valuable institution then men and women should both be expec…
/r/MensRights14/04/26 03:34 AM
34

Really not hard to figure out. Who gets the jobs is downstream from who gets the education opportunities. Grade school redesigned and focused on girls success and giving girls more opportunities, more scholarships/grants for advanced schooling, affirmative action in admission, special programs in colleges, bias and quotas in hiring opportunities. Boys drugged at epidemic rates, no male role models, discriminated against by female teachers, vanishing opportunities in admissions and financing and …
/r/MensRights13/04/26 12:43 AM
2

What the fuck are toxic masculinity traits anyway? Just like all feminist tools it seems to be another narrative weapon in the shape of convenient moveable goal posts. Let's stop letting ideologically captured feminist fields pathologize being male. Boys are not defective girls - they are boys.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 12:05 AM
1

Why is the UK always speed running the dystopian hell challenge? Can't wait for more fictional documentaries where a middle class white boy tells off a teacher and is made to become the symbol for this misogyny. Another few handmaids tales on television while the UK tosses real boys into ideological indoctrination via forced programs in schools, and more blathering on from talking heads and politicians about the boogeyman "manosphere". Instead of actually grappling with the real and uncomfortabl…
/r/MensRights07/04/26 12:01 AM
3

I agree - it shows the total and complete disregard they have for men who are accused. And although logically it seems like false accusations would hurt 'real victims', in practice it hasn't seemed to. Society doesn't even consider false accusations at all and operates under a "believe victims" mantra. Over the decades since this motto has been used, the fanatical anti-male and pro-female stances have only deepened. No woman today is facing any kind of uphill battle due to false accusations.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 11:51 PM
3

This answer is just sad all around. First the casual and pointless snipe at men. The classic stereotyping of men as base, animalistic, devoid of emotions. Fight and fuck. Then the usual women are wonderful idealized view of women. There are many many women who enjoy casual sex. There's entire cultures around one night stands after clubbing or whatever. Many men enjoy casual sex also. There are also many men and women who prefer an emotional dimension to sex. Abby wasn't very helpful today.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 12:47 AM
7

Misandry has no gender. Men can also come to hate or dismiss men. This often happens through a toxic cocktail of propaganda men face from birth: First being forced to process the overwhelming anti-male narratives on television, in books, in movies, taught in grade school and colleges/universities, on social media. If you're inside this bubble with no way to examine it then it's impossible not to internalize the portrays of these characters and disrespect men and male roles. The second facing mis…
/r/MensRights29/03/26 07:17 PM
3

The term "male loneliness epidemic" refers to a documented rise in social isolation among men, particularly in North America and parts of Europe, over roughly the past 10-20 years. It's prefixed with "male" because it's a gendered issue that affects men in a unique and widespread way. Despite what many bitter women on social media would have you believe, this isn't really about romance or romantic partners: It's about social connections in general, and in many ways it's about the loss of "third …
/r/MensRights28/03/26 06:09 PM
6

The study does not support "Men see paths, women scan for danger". It only supports that women scan more while men focus more. That's it. Everything else is just researches projecting themselves on to the data and choosing to serve an agenda. In reality, crime statistics and actual data are very clear: It's far more dangerous to walk alone at night as a man than a woman. Full stop. Here is another well understood psychological fact: Women report higher levels of fear of crime than men, despite m…
/r/MensRights28/03/26 05:05 PM
5

That is called the "No true Scotsman fallacy". They have no problem having solidarity with all feminists when it's convenient but when you point out bad behavior the definitions of feminist start shifting as if by magic. Feminism is a label you take on by choice. It has a political ideology that underpins it, a history that precedes it, and expectations of it's adherents that extend beyond just women's issues. It's a hateful ideology and irredeemable and if it wasn't for women's in-group bias an…
/r/MensRights28/03/26 04:54 PM
15

It's just sexists using random science facts to support their hateful ideology. The facts are torn free from context and used like bludgeons, but there is nothing in them that supports any of the leaps of logic people are making to support their generalized hate theories. Just read girls start puberty at ~10-11 on average and boys ~11-12. Girls finish earlier and boys have a longer window. These facts mean nothing about boys and girls beyond the fact itself. Schools are now designed for girls su…
/r/MensRights28/03/26 04:46 PM
1

Eh, you're a fool if you believe that. Obviously the headline is hyperbole clickbait, but puking the letter of a hate law here as it exists on the books and expecting that to be how it's actually applied in 2026 is also a wildly out of touch take.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 04:32 PM
52

Don't underestimate a "Male jobs lost, women most affected." narrative. Never forget the articles about how women in Ukraine couldn't find able bodied partners. (because the men were all forced into the meat grinder and/or injured)
/r/MensRights22/03/26 04:44 AM
22

That's what happens when you start with a conclusion and work backwards. Most of these studies are just activism designed to find ways to support the cause.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 04:41 AM
34

Feminists will always work hand in glove with anyone in power. They will try to co-opt and corrupt and steal that power if they can, but if they can't they will happily work along side it. Every philosophy that is based on power dynamics creates an attraction to power in it's adherents.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 04:39 PM
15

...becoming? It's been that way.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 10:01 PM
10

Can't be - I was told misandry isn't real.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 09:59 PM
2

Premise is flawed. Men have a wide variety of hobbies, which have had tremendous impact over time, and sometimes spawned industries and changed the world. Telling on themselves. If they hold the false view that men's only hobby is working out, then it's because the only men they meet are ones are in shape from taking working out seriously. They are whining about their own shallow preferences. Since when does a hobby have to be useful? Since when do people have to justify what they get out of one…
/r/MensRights16/03/26 12:15 AM
1

The problem with passing judgement on the whole world is you do not actually have a clear picture or first hand experience with much of the conclusions you are forcing yourself to draw. You're seeing a distorted vision built by agendas, lies, spotlights, feedback mechanisms, and every input is modulated by your own brain which means through the lens of your own anger. Anger creates vigilance and soon you only see what you are looking for. People fill ambiguity in situations by projecting their o…
/r/MensRights14/03/26 05:04 PM
16

These "arrangements" have been happening since the beginning of recorded history but somehow it's a modern affliction where the women are victims rather than this being innate human behavior. I'd say these women are being pathologized for totally average behavior because it isn't seen as kosher in the modern zeitgeist. As with so many female behaviors, once you peek beneath the women-are-wonderful surface, you eventually learns it's actually common. No behaviors are less scrutinized than female …
/r/MensRights14/03/26 03:20 PM
30

Every study shows men face far more harassment online than women. It just turns out women happen to be more equal than equal when it comes to anyone caring.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 02:19 AM
27

Society only acknowledges male loneliness because they can blame men for it. They just say it's toxic masculinity, or men don't cry enough, or men are too stoic, or men don't <whatever behavior you want to impose on men per your own agenda>. As long as they can wag the finger and say "You suffer but it's your own fault" they are all good with acknowledging male suffering. Not only does let them acknowledge the data without disavowing feminist dogma around male privilege, but it also let's them o…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 02:14 AM
54

Women are favored in school. I apologize I'm not as concise as you are but to flesh it out Girls receive higher grades for identical work in primary and secondary school Female teachers interact more positively with female students and studies show there is a "pro-female" bias in the form of mentorship and role-modelling that specifically benefits girls On role modelling, obviously there are very few male teachers left in primary and secondary education compared to women. Schools have been redes…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 02:10 AM
16

Encouraging girls to enter STEM fields is important and long overdue. Why? Some STEM fields are majority male but there are still a huge amount of women in them. There has always been women in these fields. Other STEM fields - like medicine or biology - have female majority. Why isn't anyone saying that encouraging men to be family doctors is long overdue? Why is gender parity in STEM meaningful? Is there a difference whether a woman or man writes a computer program to calculate a Fibonacci sequ…
/r/MensRights06/03/26 02:43 PM
5

A very long time ago when I first became interested in this topic I did a deep dive into feminist slogans, statistics, studies, books, and narratives. It was sobering. They were all cooked. Surveys designed to come to a conclusion. Numbers and context purposefully omitted to paint a specific picture. When data couldn't be coaxed into supporting the narrative it was simply trashed. They would claim to care about this great injustice which was real, while at the same time actively investing number…
/r/MensRights02/03/26 03:28 AM
9

It would have helped if you had linked to the survey in question through an archive link. My guess is it unwraps to something like this: "82% of [likely 50 online respondents from targeted communities to create sample bias] women [or people who claim to be] state they experience [in a totally subjective way] creepy behaviors [as defined by them, e.g. sharing elevator with man who said good morning while also being unattractive] [where experience is defined as it having happened to you once befor…
/r/MensRights02/03/26 03:17 AM
17

Women "does bad thing" and the question always seems to be "What did he do?"
/r/MensRights01/03/26 04:53 AM
23

They don't repeat those things because they think they are true - they repeat them because they are "sticky". They aren't interested in truth, just narrative. They know it's not true and they don't care. The ideological and philosophical branch these people belong is only interested in using words rhetorically as a means to an end. They are bad faith actors in any discussion where they claim to want to debate or claim to be in interested in truth. They are warring against you.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 04:50 AM
2

I've said time and again that misandry is far more widespread and far more extreme today than misogyny. This kind of rhetoric - which you see commonly online every day - is an example. Go ahead and report it. The company will review it and say it doesn't violate any content guidelines. It's accepted and signal boosted on standard mainstream social media. Hundreds of thousands of likes. Imagine the roles switched. Imagine if you came across a video of a man saying he exercises his hatred of women…
/r/MensRights01/03/26 04:44 AM
16

Women set up a lot of events that appeal specifically to women and then wonder where the men are. If I was a woman I'd be embarrassed to make it to adulthood and have so little understanding of the masculine. There's so much shame sent men's way for lack of experience, but so many of these women are just out there seeking to date themselves.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 02:08 AM
47

I read the article. As expected, her most extreme examples of misogyny are basically a light drizzle compared to the absolute torrential downpour of misandry men experience online on a good day.Here is one of her examples: "Do y’all females ever tell ur homegirls 'sis chill you letting too many dudes hit?".. Apparently the use of the word female here is degrading and also men are bad if they care about sexual history and that is why this a grave example of misogyny. Meanwhile today I've experien…
/r/MensRights23/02/26 02:51 PM
11

Archive link: https://archive.is/LLPZO
/r/MensRights23/02/26 02:04 PM
6

Everything you said is absolutely correct. You have demonstrated a deep understanding of the situation men are in and how it's reflected across so many cross cutting aspects of life socially, culturally, institutionally, and psychologically. Yet I disagree. You write as though men need the sanction of society. That we need to wait for institutions to recognize men's issues. That someone has to make room for us. We don't. I don't see men's rights in that light. The most important and vital work f…
/r/MensRights22/02/26 05:21 PM
24

The data and evidence is absolutely clear. Starting a decade ago women began a hard nose dive to the left. Men did not change at all until recently. In 2024 men have moved slightly rightward while young women have continued dive bombing to the left. Yet where were the articles raise raising alarms about this radical leftward shift among women? We see rage about right wing voices but no solutions are put forth. Here's the truth: The left hates men. The result is that it can't make content for men…
/r/MensRights22/02/26 04:52 PM
9

Society is brilliant at coming up with the most insanely complex narratives and rationalizations for the same basic idea: "women feel threatened by loss of power" It's becoming the primary driver behind so many of our little stories.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 05:34 AM
2

Never forget that the male loneliness epidemic was originally coined to refer to the loss of third spaces and social roles for men. We used to have social clubs and places for men who aren't married, men who are divorced, men who are widowed, young men not yet attached, for male teens and children, and - of course - also men in relationships and married. Men would engage with the community through these groups doing charitable acts and engaging in politics. Over the decades these groups have bee…
/r/MensRights19/02/26 05:11 AM
6

Haven't you learned that even if the ratio of suffering is 9:1 male to female, that "1" unit women carry is still what they write stories about. "Men struggling, suffering, and dying - women most affected."
/r/MensRights19/02/26 01:15 AM
9

It's so fashionable too. As years come and go women always get new trendy labels to couch their behavior in to avoid accountability. These labels become saturated with their sins and are discarded - but a new excuse is never far away. It's a wonder the species survived at all.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 12:19 AM
9

Whether it's Scott Galloway, Bill Maher, or menslib: Approaching the problems men face firmly within the constraints of gynocentrism and feminism will always lead to irrecoverable cognitive dissonance and bizarre conclusions. They can read the stats and they can admit it's true but they can never understand the actual causes and their solutions are absurd.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 12:15 AM
6

Archive link: https://archive.is/TVBMU Don't give misandrist companies like the Guardian any clicks.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 12:20 AM
2

It's just how they were socialized so they couldn't help it? It didn't cross their mind? They just have no choice but to go along with the crowd? They felt threatened by an attractive woman so they had no choice but to tear her down? No. Women are not that stupid and not that without agency. Women are choosing. They know it hurts others. They know they'll get support from other women for doing it. They know hurting men gives them a kind of power. It isn't ignorance. There are counterpoints on ev…
/r/MensRights08/02/26 07:17 PM
18

One way women gain power is through interaction with men. The entire feminist house of cards is based on getting free shit by peddling grievance narratives. Radical feminists are usually women who couldn't pull this off, became embittered and obsessive, and that bitterness turned to hate. The result is that they have, ironically and by definition, oriented their entire lives around men. Now men are just walking away? Men going their own way reduces their leverage to use men, reduces their prospe…
/r/MensRights08/02/26 06:52 PM
3

This isn’t about confidence in the traditional sense. It’s about social risk. Being filmed. Being screenshotted. Becoming a punchline online for misreading a moment. This understates the issue. This is bad enough, but it's also dangerous. Those videos and screenshots are not just for ridicule. Future women act on them, people can get beat up over them. Women can make claims and get you banned from a place and could even get police involvement. Their complaints are escalated and acted on without …
/r/MensRights07/02/26 08:10 PM
6

Here's the truth: Traditional wives and husbands only work broadly when the society itself supports and honors those roles. When the wife is held accountable to the expectation of taking care of the home, cooking meals, raising children, and being the supportive pillar for the husband in his role of orienting his career around providing and protecting and in his authority over the family. None of that exists today. Today women are held to no standards by society and are never asked to be account…
/r/MensRights07/02/26 07:54 PM
9

I'm always surprised that these people have never once in their lives done the very simple smoke test of "reverse the roles". Instead they just fire from the hip without a single thought in their heads.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 07:36 PM
6

Both men and women can come to feel a kind of bitterness towards the other gender. Most human's feel a constant need for a partner, romance, and sex in their lives and if that need goes unfulfilled - either because of bad experiences or a lack of experiences at all - then we can come to project that on to the entire gender as a defense mechanism. This happens to varying degrees and people deal with it on a personal level. But what if we are told such feelings are valid, and what if that feeling …
/r/MensRights06/02/26 02:30 PM
1

You are making a lot of claims here but I'm skeptical of many of them. Some are downright bizarre. Do you have any evidence for them? Male managers promote women they are attracted to. I've never seen anything like this nor any studies to this effect. Being attractive in general maybe? Weak. Soft. Man up. Women do this. Men might not be open but they will say "That sucks dude". Men don't go to other men and tell them to be a man unless they want to start a fight. Men enforce toxic masculinity on…
/r/MensRights06/02/26 12:05 AM
3

I'd be happier too if I was in a space exclusively designed for me, a structure exclusively catered to me, with teachers who have a bias towards me, with lessons that cast me as morally superior, where all my feelings are validated and approved without introspection, and a bunch of special programs and opportunities are set aside specifically for me. For boys schools are hostile places. Programs designed with girls in mind ill fit boys learning styles, recesses and physical education that have b…
/r/MensRights03/02/26 02:06 PM
16

The traditional male role can only function in a society that respects and honors it. In our society we've stripped away that respect. We expect them to do dangerous labor, consider themselves disposable, become oriented around utility and providing. Yet, we give men none of the commensurate social honor, authority, status, or security within marriage that were also once part of the traditional male role. Instead, we use the "male role" as a cover to exploit men today. We force them to make all …
/r/MensRights01/02/26 09:23 PM
7

If all you see is "men are not lonely enough" you're luckier than me. Every day I see genocidal rhetoric and total dehumanization sprinkled with celebrations and joviality about male suicide.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 05:09 PM
2

The overall message is nice but I will nitpick "Where women are worse off (US + most countries)" anyway: Physical safety. Much higher risk of sexual violence, domestic violence, and stalking This is true-ish but it presents as a false dichotomy with the line given about violence under men. The truth is men experience for higher levels of almost every type of violent crime. These experiences women experience are pretty rare by comparison. Reproductive health & autonomy: Pregnancy risk, childbirth…
/r/MensRights25/01/26 03:13 AM
16

Funny how the constant byline to modern life is that the world has a big bad misogyny problem yet these women casually drop morally abhorrent, dehumanizing lines indistinguishable in structure from genocidal rhetoric. Of course, anyone who spends more than few minutes online will know that misandry is actually the order of the day: condoned, celebrated, and widespread. But I'm told the real problem is men going their own way or something. Lines like that are not simply memes online. They were re…
/r/MensRights25/01/26 02:58 AM
1

As the old saying goes: "Men are not defective women". Society treats women's behavior in regards to emotional pain as the gold standard and claims men are defective when they don't behave the same way. Did you know that testosterone inhibits emotional crying? A hormone most certainly found in abundance in men compared to women. Did you know that studies show prolactin lowers the threshold for emotional crying? That hormone has much higher levels in - you guessed it - women. Physiologically spea…
/r/MensRights25/01/26 02:19 AM
6

So let me see if I've gotten this right: Subject: Astonishing and shocking male suicide rates. You: "Wow this is bad." Them: "dO yoU hAtE WoMen????" Throughout history many societies have needed their scapegoats. Men are one such scapegoats today. Rooted in feminism, which has become the religion of the secular state, men are portrayed as having caused all suffering historically and ongoing - an all powerful out-group that lived in privilege while continually oppressing women. This narrative wre…
/r/MensRights21/01/26 05:59 AM
9

Hey guys don't forget 1 in 4 homeless is a woman. Insert money here.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 05:39 AM
6

The truth is most women don't really see men as human and as a result don't really consider their suffering. Editing this clip together to destroy this man's life for clout was no more considered ethically than taking a video of cute animals or a storm or some leaves. Just a random man on a random Friday. He did nothing to deserve it. Never forget that it could be you next. No man is really safe as long as society burns with a fever of anti-male sentiment and an unhinged desperation to serve wom…
/r/MensRights21/01/26 05:37 AM
6

Historically, every time women got the short end of the stick it's "oppression by an all encompassing patriarchy". Every time men got the short of the end stick it's "Patriarchy hurts men too" or "due to oppression of women men also suffered". So basically, their ideology provides the answer to all questions. Their ideology is treated as an axiom. The world can only be understood through it but the ideology itself can not be challenged. Every feminist lives in a distorted warped reality. Feminis…
/r/MensRights21/01/26 05:28 AM
1

One is a political movement based on power dynamics that seeks political power, and the other is not. One focuses on hatred of men with posts like "The male population needs to be reduced to 10%" and "men need to be eradicated" and the other does not. One enforces in-group purity and advocates witch hunts and actively attacking women who don't toe the line via witch hunts the other does not. Superficially the two seem similar as they both advocate "going your own way", but MGTOW is a personal st…
/r/MensRights04/01/26 09:50 PM
2

Nope, those two things are even remotely the same thing. You making that false equivalence despite what I wrote makes me immediately label you as a bad faith actor.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 06:48 PM
5

I'll actually answer on the odd chance you're seriously asking. 4B is a radical feminist hate movement that started in South Korea. 4B translates to the "Four Nos" which are: no sex with men, no dating men, no marrying men, no giving birth. They are one of those groups that makes their whole identity "decentering men" which means, ironically, that they center men in all things. Like most misandrist movements, the level of hatred far exceeds anything you've ever experienced from even the most har…
/r/MensRights04/01/26 06:13 PM
3

Of course the framing does more harm than good. That's the whole point. People who say this fall into two camps: Because they are ignorant and propagandized into identity politics and hate. Because it serves their interests to lie - often due to hateful destructive ideology or the need for a scapegoat. The former is a victim of the latter, as are we all.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 12:27 AM
18

If the genders were reversed she would be "NTA" for sure. It's even reasonable since the only thing at issue is 15 minutes. Of course, even in that situation the man would still be attacked: He would be called a baby for whining about the delay. He would also be ridiculed for not being able to handle the problem himself. He would be called selfish for interrupting her visit with her parents and forcing his gf to drive across town when he could have gotten a jump himself. They just hate men.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 11:12 PM
13

He never said "I said I'd be right there" he said "I'll be there". If I was going to meet my wife to pick her up and I was ran 10-15 minutes behind schedule I don't think she'd even notice. Something deeply irrational is at play, which is often the case in the sub. The story doesn't quite add up either.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 11:06 PM
47

The top comment reveals many of the irrational biases in play: Only a man would say a woman is in a reasonably safe area. A woman is never safe, especially broken down and alone. Men are actually at more risk for violent crime in all types of situations. A man broken down in her exact same situation is at more risk than she is. Full stop. If this fact - backed by all numbers and statistics - challenges your intuition then you've been propagandized. "you'd be pissed if some loser did this to your…
/r/MensRights02/01/26 10:57 PM
2

Agreed - they are just constructing an echo chamber to live inside. A place where all their biases can be confirmed and they can point at a crude painting on the wall and hurl insults. It's their "two minutes hate". Anyone who disrupts that will just get banned.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 08:10 PM
8

women are more likely to attempt suicide The truth is that women who attempt suicide use non-lethal methods and also attempt multiple times. So either they are too incompetent to succeed they use the act of a cry for help. Men know that no one cares and no help is coming, so when they attempt they succeed. It's really two very different behaviors. men just die more often since they are more violent Men do not use more violent means - they use more lethal means. While handguns are common in the U…
/r/MensRights31/12/25 08:05 PM
4

OK, let's not say it's a cry for help/attention. Let's just stick to the facts. Women attempt more often using explicitly non-lethal methods and those women who attempt in this way tend to do it many times over. When men attempt they tend to use a lethal method and succeed. Now, I think fair to say both women and men are equally capable of researching and determining a lethal means of suicide, so at this point you're clearly comparing apples and oranges socially and psychologically even without …
/r/MensRights31/12/25 07:51 PM
7

We really live in a giant delusion when it comes to gender. The programming runs so deep. Far beyond culture or ideological programming. Science has revealed some of the truth, but most of our narratives around gender run counter to the scientific facts so they are not woven into narratives or taught.
/r/MensRights29/12/25 11:26 PM
1

I don't think there is one. Even if such a trend existed in aggregate there would be too much noise at the individual level for it to be predictive. There area seasons to life, and whatever else the past is - it's gone. Every man must seize happiness for himself.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 02:35 PM
3

There are two core problems with the claim "men are the problem": one statistical and one environmental. Statistical Gender is a weak statistical predictor of violence. While most gun violence is committed by men, very few men commit gun violence. Over 99% of men will never do so, and the vast majority will never commit violent crime of any kind. A tiny fraction of men account for a disproportionate share of violence. Statistically, age predicts violent crime better than gender, yet no one argue…
/r/MensRights27/12/25 06:59 PM
16

becoming? It's been unfriendly for over a decade. Firstly, almost every time I go into a bookshop I see many misandrist and gynocentric books. It literally happens every time. Bookshops are toxic as hell -when is the public gonna have that discussion. In some ways this really isn't books specific. This is just current state of culture with women. Any media today that women majority consume has a large amount of misandrist, gynocentric, toxic hate content. The thing with books is that it's become…
/r/MensRights27/12/25 05:57 PM
8

"Men need to show up" This article is pretty bad. I've read this exact article many times before. Essentially says "Men need to start actively engaging, speak for themselves, and participate thoughtfully in discussions about gender rather than leave the narrative to others or shrink from scrutiny." And as usual it falls apart under the un-reality of it's own premise. Here we are. Advocacy for men has never waned. We've been speaking up for twenty years and more. The truth is male advocacy has al…
/r/MensRights25/12/25 10:02 PM
5

This is what confirmation bias looks like. You've gone into the irrational post of someone in distress and an emotional state and pretending his personal post is about men's issues generally, and further you're using that and cherry picking specific comments that are in the minority and using it to justify your position. In reality, the vast majority of commenters and posts in this sub fully accept that men are involved in reinforcing and supporting structures that harm men. it's even directly r…
/r/MensRights25/12/25 06:22 PM
25

Every single thing you said is absolutely true - it's unfair, it's awful, it's terrible, it's hypocritical, and it's infuriating. Women online en masse spread the most vile hatred one can imagine and no one holds them accountable. None of the things they say are based on facts, evidence, or statistics yet are endlessly signal boosted and celebrated by other women. Reasonable discussion from men is labeled as misogynistic or incels. The women who make these posts embrace the unfairness of benevol…
/r/MensRights25/12/25 05:10 PM
25

We are continually told misogyny is rampant yet look at the misandry. They will claim it's humor, but no book like this would be published today if the genders were reversed. Then look at how men are portrayed on television. Look at the unrelenting armies of radicalized women whose daily output on social media would put even the most hardened misogynist to shame. Look how schools are designed to be anti-boy, justice system anti-male, support programs for men annihilated, regard for men in societ…
/r/MensRights24/12/25 09:14 PM
8

Yeah - I agree. Culture discourages men from reporting or even contextualizing sexual assault for what it is, the system discourages male reporting, and is hyper focused on female sexual assault which inflates number, and such claims often ignore sexual assault that happens within male only prisons.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 09:41 PM
6

That's no excuse, of course.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 05:58 PM
10

I'm always shocked that these girls who hate men always seem to take on boyfriends, and that that the boys they hate go along with it. If you want my advice it's this: Unless you feel very strongly you don't need to raise it specifically and can wait for an organic conversation about gender to come up. Don't argue or provide counters to her points as that will set up an adversarial framework which will entrench her in her current position. Instead, think of parallel talking points in male advoca…
/r/MensRights23/12/25 01:16 AM
21

Statistically, the only class of crime women are more likely to experience due to gender is sexual assault. As awful as that is, it isn't being killed. Your chances of being killed specifically because you are a man - legally, institutionally, culturally - are so massive it can't be seen as anything but widespread misandry throughout all aspects of society. Men are more likely to die from violent crime. Men are more likely to be victims of all forms of violent crime - including homicide. Men are…
/r/MensRights23/12/25 12:58 AM
1

Good list op. bcz most victims of SA are women Doubt. I know it's not exactly the point of your post but felt the need discuss. Culture discourages men from reporting or even contextualizing SA as SA, system discourages male reporting, system is hyper focused on female SA which inflates number, and such claims often ignore SA that happens within male only prisons.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 08:18 PM
4

All correct op. Scott Galloway has polluted this subreddit for a while due to his recent media blitz on television targeted towards female demographics. I find I'm writing the same thing more or less and will try to be less verbose. Controlled opposition. Always has been, always will be. The menslib of male advocacy: His advice is designed to subordinate male advocacy to feminism and subjugate men to a political party. He's schtick is to take the traditional male gender role and selectively pick…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 08:07 PM
10

Feminists, cooking the books, fixing studies to go their way, and integrity. Pick the option that doesn't belong. Years ago when I first started on this journey I set out to read many books and look into many studies often cited by feminists. Without exception I saw the same thing: Studies designed to reach a specific outcome, results misinterpreted to reinforce a narrative, and studies buried without publication when they couldn't be massaged enough. Op has done a great job picking apart this i…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 06:32 PM
5

Studies show that women tend to have a natural fear of crime and perceived risk of victimization that far exceeds that of men, despite the fact that in many places, and for most offenses, men's actual victimization rate is much higher. A fear that is far out of proportion with what actual crime statistics would indicate is required. Given this information two strategies can be chosen: Liberate them from their fear. Work to educate women that their innate fear is unfounded based on real world sta…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 06:22 PM
27

The UK military chief making an announcement that they need more people to fight enemies abroad like Russia, and the constant desire to implement conscription and forced military service by their PM is surely not at all related to the dehumanization of boys and men being done at home.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 03:34 AM
20

If there's one thing I'm sure of it's that demonizing boys, treating them second class, educating them into self hate definitely 100% won't back fire. /s I guess when there's no actual misogynists, feminists have to start working hard to manufacturing them. Whole movement collapses without 'the enemy'.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 04:36 AM
1

I'm sorry that happened to your aunt, but I think the intersection between gender and mental illness makes this much much worse for men. I mean, even in your own comment pedo is far worse than junkie. It's socially acceptable to do violence to men, there's far fewer shelters and support for men, and men are treated with even less sympathy in online harassment campaigns of the kind you outlined.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 04:57 AM
8

Unfortunately those sites are just revenge porn for women. The larger issue is the empathy gap. The state and public sentiment covers pretty much every aspect of relationship fallout for women while men are given no support and treated as aggressors. So even though these sites are used for revenge and malice no one cares.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 04:52 AM
74

They definitely are one thing or another. They posted this but contradict themselves in comments. The account is new, they made this post and cross posted this to feminist subreddits, and now are posting on other feminist subreddits. This person is suspicious as hell.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 04:45 AM
1

I guess these women are damsels in distress in need of protection by men after all.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 07:28 PM
45

Studies show women have an incredibly strong in-group bias - 4.5x higher than men. Meanwhile men have no statistically significant in-group bias. Think about that. 4.5x. 450%. It's really difficult to imagine the incredible ways such a strong in-group bias must color their thinking on virtually everything. That's why I'm never surprised that whenever any post on social media has both men and women that the majority of women automatically side with the woman, even when it means ignoring facts and…
/r/MensRights16/12/25 06:58 PM
3

One of the most sacred beliefs that people in the west are indoctrinated into - especially on the left - is that of tabula rasa: the blank slate. In "nature vs nurture" they tend tend to over subscribe everything to nurture and minimize nature. I understand why. It's a very comforting and maybe even healthy belief that we are all born with equal potential and that if we just fix inequalities in society then we will enter a utopian age, and going the nature route can be scary. Unfortunately, thei…
/r/MensRights16/12/25 06:38 PM
33

It has always been that way but don't underestimate how much more oppressive and brutal things can get. The current implicit bias in favor of girls and against boys, the subtle ways in which girls behaviors are treated as better and boys are discriminated against and treated unfairly, and the organic patch work of indoctrination is one thing. It all exists now. However, when it's made into policy and indoctrination is given funding with it's own classes and books, and the government expects repo…
/r/MensRights14/12/25 05:50 PM
8

The gender that faces the least amount of violence gets all the support in stopping violence against them. The gender that seen as entire generation become hard line radicalized misandrists must get support against mostly imagined pockets of misogyny that have no support and no power. his toxicity is being fuelled by the growing popularity and influence of online influencers such as Tate What year is this? Tate was around so briefly and they've gotten so much mileage out of him that at this poin…
/r/MensRights13/12/25 09:41 PM
30

It's hard not to view it that way. Created by brits and for brits. Just some random rando Netflix show but almost instantly the entire UK media was covering it and "on message" with the volume dials turned to eleven and the prime minister is giving it lip service and trying to get it into schools. It's not like the idea of a propaganda film is a new one.
/r/MensRights13/12/25 09:15 PM
12

Original sin where they expect you to spend a lifetime chasing redemption - as they define it - even though redemption here is impossible.
/r/MensRights13/12/25 09:08 PM
4

Of course - didn't you see that fictional nonsense fake documentary series that we used to drum up support for attacking boys? Based on our made up fictional story, we need to make sure real boys in the real world don't make the same fictional mistake again!
/r/MensRights13/12/25 09:05 PM
9

Every day we hear about racial disparities in the justice system. It's true. For example, controlling for variables there with same crimes and similar history black men will receive longer sentences than white men. According to some reports, this can even lead to sentences which are 13-20% longer. That's really bad, but this disparity doesn't even come close to the unfairness in the justice system between and women. For same crime, same history, and controlling for variables women receive far mo…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 07:59 PM
12

Not enough context. The fact that you are seem to be deliberately obfuscating context is suspicious. What did he actually say? Where are those comments from? Therefore I won't comment on David Gandy nor the commenters in the images you pasted. Taking your question abstractly literally anyone can be a male advocate. Not only are all men accepted, but all women as well. In fact, attractive (or wealthy) men may face unique issues as men due to that status despite the general "privilege" involved. H…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 07:45 PM
32

Mental load, also sometimes called emotional labor, is having lots of things on your mind. It’s having to remember to pick up eggs, to label your kid’s PE kit, to plan the Christmas shopping, to buy and make dinners for the week, to read the communications from school—the list goes on. Damn. Sound like these women need to learn how to organize. Do they know they can write shit down and not constantly think about it? I recommend a calendar.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 04:35 AM
3

Yes, I've noticed this as well. It's always had a very strong bias in favor of women - possibly a stronger bias than on any other topic - but for a few months now it's begun to take real world ideological positions on this and other politically sensitive topics. If you refute it's original irrational or unfounded assertions using arguments based on logic (like math logic) as well as scientific evidence it has looked up itself via web search then it will eventually relent. I find it's useful if y…
/r/MensRights08/12/25 11:26 PM
5

By all accounts he's left wing and identifies as atheist. What he's doing is packaging trade-con values into a feminist container and selling it to the left. He perceives men moving to the right based on the appeal of those values rather than the left being toxic to men, so he's picked out the ones he thought would be useful to harness and packaged them in a box that is palatable to the left but still subordinates men to women and male advocacy to feminism. For example, he advocates that men sac…
/r/MensRights07/12/25 06:29 AM
7

I'll say the same thing I say every time Scott Gallaway in brought up here. He's the controlled opposition of male advocacy. He's the menslib of male advocacy. He attempts to capture boys and men who are becoming conscious of the ways that society is unfair and oppressive to men and he attempts to couch that consciousness firmly within a framework that still places the needs of men in a subordinate position to those of women and puts men back on track to be used and sacrificed by society for the…
/r/MensRights07/12/25 06:11 AM
6

Women will always be considered "the good gender". It's how the species is wired. We're programmed to respond to the grievance and needs of women. Over time and cross-culturally people people see women in a more positive light than men, work to resolve the grievance of women, and protect them. Meanwhile over time and cross-culturally studies show people have a greater tolerance to risk and harm men - the "dispoable gender" - in wars, in dangerous work. Hell even in the infamous "trolley problem"…
/r/MensRights07/12/25 05:41 AM
6

It's hard to know where to start because it's such a stupid statement. It has no factual basis. It's just a purely rhetorical statement designed to score points on some scoreboard only bitter women keep in their heads. Factually and logically it's absurd. Let's go over some reason why. Empirically, neither men nor women's biggest fear is being murdered. The comparison being made isn't relevant because men and women perceive risk differently. It's making generalized statements about all men and a…
/r/MensRights04/12/25 01:51 AM
106

Just a reminder that U.S. troops were repeatedly told not to intervene when Afghan forces and allies abused boys, and soldiers who did intervene were punished. Cases involving girls didn’t get that same “hands off” enforcement and intervention common.
/r/MensRights01/12/25 02:08 PM
12

The funny thing is that by all evidence we have it's actually much more dangerous to walk alone at night as a man in developed countries.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 06:30 PM
6

Original sin is alive and well in the world of feminists. The sins of the father are borne by the son, and in their version there is no redemption. Though they derive power from tricking men into seeking it. The fact is, the entire historical narrative is bullshit anyway. Revisionist history.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 05:48 PM
47

This is a hard read. If a dude posted this, nothing sadder than a dude who is so pathetic and thirsty he signals his obedience like a dog by denigrating men and putting women on a pedestal. Hope the good boy points from leftover women online worth it. There is really no way to interpret all those upvotes in a positive light. They represents self-hating men, female supremacists, misandrists who hate men, women who pity themselves, people who are corrupted by fear and lies,… bitterness resentment …
/r/MensRights30/11/25 02:51 PM
20

The point isn't that the ex left, the point is that when a woman and a man are in the same situation women receive support, sympathy, and kindness while men are kicked, ridiculed, and degraded.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 10:42 PM
116

Studies show women have an incredibly strong in-group bias - 4.5x higher than men. Meanwhile men have no statistically significant in-group bias. Think about that. 4.5x. 450%. It's really difficult to imagine the incredible ways such a strong in-group bias must color their thinking on virtually everything. That's why I'm never surprised that whenever any post on social media has both men and women that the majority of women automatically side with the woman, even when it means ignoring facts and…
/r/MensRights29/11/25 10:39 PM
4

You're right - but this is still relevant because this is one piece in a larger context that is the Canadian government moving to suppress men's issues. The Canadian government has made many overtures about male spaces online as creating hatred and misogyny. There has been two separate federal bills introduced (in 2024, 2025) to curb hate-propaganda online and in both cases the male spaces online were given lip service. It's still the standing committee on Canadian heritage who is hosting this m…
/r/MensRights29/11/25 03:31 AM
3

Yeah, I agree. I think you hit the nail on the head when you said 'degree'. It's true of all women, but in the context of what op mentioned "I attract the gold digger type. [...] It's sort of a new class of high end escort that uses Instagram to advertise." the degree is extreme. A complete way of life. So while all women do this, most women have other things going too where they rely on it less and often ultimately have aspirations like starting a family that actually align with becoming a girl…
/r/MensRights29/11/25 03:29 AM
3

A government moving to suppress the burgeoning formation of a male class consciousness by using feminist narratives as justification for censorship and oppression? I can't think of anywhere on the entire internet more relevant than this subreddit.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 03:03 AM
14

I think you've made a mistake. Let me explain. Everything you said is absolutely true, but you're not talking about all women, you are just talking about women who work as escorts, sex workers, and "sugar babies" (or whatever you wanna call women who live off the largesse of men who have disposable income without being overtly transactional about it). Consequently, it's not that all attractive women are like this, it's that women who are like this have to be attractive. They have to learn how to…
/r/MensRights29/11/25 02:50 AM
9

They never really wanted equality - they just wanted a bigger share of the spoils without the risk or responsibility. It's overwhelmingly men who mine the resources, do the manufacturing, transport the products, put food in the stores, keep the lights on, and the water running - and it's men who lay down their lives to defend it. It's men who lose their lives working the 'dirty and dangerous' jobs that create support structures necessary for women to work in office jobs. Last I checked mainstrea…
/r/MensRights29/11/25 02:36 AM
19

I noticed this earlier when I saw a video of two women fighting and the comments all said "All these men just sitting around!", conveying the idea that men have a duty to get involved to protect women. I've seen the same sentiment often - whether it's that men should give up their seats for women, or carry heavy things for women, or put themselves in danger for women - and I've always found it ironic that women hold men these traditional gender roles today when they absolutely refuse any expecta…
/r/MensRights28/11/25 05:02 PM
0

It's really truly not a mystery at all. When people say we don't know how LLMs work that's misleading. What they really mean is that (1) By design the training process generates output data in a way that's efficient for doing inference later and (2) that data is a giant collection of matrices and therefore (3) predicting output ahead of inference is an interpretation-hard non-linear problem. However, that is not the same as 'we don't understand'. As they are fully deterministic and we know all t…
/r/MensRights27/11/25 05:25 AM
5

In this case they should be glad to be factionless. Feminism isn't a nice place to live. They corrupt and co-opt minority groups and sideline their interests by bending their energy to the will of the parent movement. The last thing you ever want 'your group' to be is just another letter appended to the end of some tyrannical acronym.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 04:43 AM
1

Ideologies like feminism that are based on power dynamics and identity use rhetoric as a weapon. In other words: Judge not on what feminism says, but instead of what feminism does. When you look at actions and outcomes instead of the marketing campaign you'll see it's clearly an actually relatively recent politically captured female supremacist movement that scapegoats and denigrates men to build solidarity and drive political action.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 04:40 AM
9

If you think Uganda is special think again. There's a reason France and other countries have outlawed paternity testing. It's everywhere including right at home. Many men are raising kids that aren't theirs. From the point of view of evolutionary psychology, there's no reason a woman needs the man who provides to be the man that impregnates.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 04:35 AM
16

You're starting to understand how so much of our every day morals and ethics are actually just women having fixed the game to cater to themselves. It's easy to see with sex, relationships, and marriage because those directly involve men and women. You can immediately see how there are entire legal mechanisms in place just to cater to women directly. With a little more examination you'll see it's not just those things - it's actually everything. We live in an extremely gynocentric society and wom…
/r/MensRights27/11/25 04:30 AM
14

I mean, the response is totally unhinged. A man wanting paternity to be established in the event of a pregnancy != all men being forced to submit DNA. It goes without saying none of this has anything to do with sexual assault and the commenter just went off the rails due to feminist brain rot. The last thing they will ever do is accept any accountability so this probably didn't occur to her, but we don't need an crazy DNA database because one presumes the woman would know who she slept with. The…
/r/MensRights27/11/25 04:21 AM
12

I do find it increasingly absurd when western feminists claim they are oppressed and women don't have power when entire countries have "feminist foreign policies" and ministries dedicated to women's advancement (feminist domestic policies). Meanwhile these countries have nothing in place for men. Good for Canada though. Carney is a complete hard line advocate for stakeholder capitalism, and championed the religious class strong-arming companies into behaving as they desire via access to capital …
/r/MensRights23/11/25 10:35 PM
26

Your advice makes sense for online gender war stuff, but it falls apart entirely when misandrists actually gain power and enact policies that oppress men. You can't just ignore the biases, policies, and laws in public institutions that treat men unfairly. Additionally you say it'll fizzle out, but it's been growing exponentially with no signs of stopping and is now no longer contained to specific spaces online. Once it becomes popular sentiment you'll see a quick acceleration of things you can't…
/r/MensRights21/11/25 05:50 PM
5

I would say: check your premises. Look at the ideological foundation of feminism. Look at what its early proponents actually wrote and believed. I think you’re mistaking the wallpaper for the structure.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 05:44 PM
148

And if you flipped the genders it'd be called "locker room talk" which is seen as completely inappropriate in a class room. Unfortunately, the casual disregard for men is widespread and tolerated. Beyond this casual disregard, it isn't unusual to hear girls in class casually slander men with the implicit or explicitly approval of teachers. Of course, schools themselves now teach original sin for boys so you reap what you sow.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 02:49 PM
5

Good parental discipline is fair and measured with boundaries established and consequences understood ahead of time. The parent should be relatively calm and in control. In this video, the woman is obviously completely out of control, and her hitting him with the belt and pulling him by his hair is clearly just about satisfying her anger and want to feel powerful. Just a bully.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 03:59 AM
2

Yes, but we should also be clear that it's also designed and intentional. LLMs undergo several layers of directed supervised and unsupervised training by the company. Companies like OpenAI have complete control over the sentiment and bias of their AI on every issue.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 03:41 AM
4

Let's break this down. First off, Misandry has a definition and it's "dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against men". It does not rely on systemic discrimination nor institutional support. Let me use it correctly in a sentence: "The feminist who said misandry doesn't exist was demonstrating misandry." However, seeing as Feminists like to play semantic games so you're forced to fight on prepared ground, let's play the cards we were dealt. What is "systematic discrimination"? Intern…
/r/MensRights21/11/25 01:19 AM
10

Far more shocking than the deepest darkest misogynist nest you could ever find online - Yet it’s just the accepted mainstream beliefs of young women. No news coverage, no concern. Instead we get fictional movies about evil little boys for society to hand wring over.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 09:22 PM
14

You have internalized propaganda. I'm going to challenge some of your arguments and hope that serves as a means to think more critically about what you believe. most abusers [...] are men Population-level data show that intimate-partner violence does not fall into the extreme gender imbalance often assumed in public discourse. The CDC’s IPV victimization estimates indicate that 47.3% of women and 44.2% of men report experiencing physical violence from a partner at some point. These figures refle…
/r/MensRights17/11/25 12:42 AM
7

I've said it before and here it is again. The mainstream likes to rant about misogyny, but any misogyny that exists is just a drop of water compared to the ocean of misandry. The sentiments expressed in this post are widespread and prominent across social media. I see countless examples as bad or worse than this post every day. Some men hate women, but an entire generation of young women have been radicalized into hatred of men. Unfortunately, there is a spotlight fallacy in play because only is…
/r/MensRights16/11/25 06:12 PM
8

Scott Gallaway is the menslib of male talking heads: Blames men as individuals for the problems men face in society while subordinating male advocacy within feminist activism. His political job is to siphon men away from the right and away from self determination and make a place for them as a second class identity within the left. In service of all that he makes some of the right noises because even in all that subterfuge considering men at all is counter to mainstream culture, but no one shoul…
/r/MensRights15/11/25 02:59 PM
8

People say [...] you must focus on women's issues The dominant gender narrative in our society - feminism - demonizes men by regarding them as oppressors. Feminists today still scapegoat men as a group. If you buy into that narrative then the idea of helping men becomes absurd: "Why does the group that hordes the power and uses it to oppress women need help?" ... or that focusing on men's issues will take away from that? Feminists treat social concern as a zero-sum game. They have the market on …
/r/MensRights12/11/25 02:23 PM
3

You say men need to stop spending inordinate time with parasocial relationships and thirst traps online and that it only exists because "men drool over and like it" and then finish by saying men should appreciate inner beauty and knowledge rather than appearance. Ok. So how does any of that lead to being more misogynist? You seem to be calling out men in your post. I do think this is an interesting topic. There's a lot to discuss in regards to lonely young men falling into parasocial relationshi…
/r/MensRights09/11/25 06:55 PM
8

The original post has been removed but there's nothing wrong with two adults of any age having a relationship. They can make their own choices. It's also very common for younger women to choose to date and marry older men. Likely because women are hypergamous (tend to marry at or above their socioeconomic station) and they seek security from a partner for themselves and for child rearing (a man who is established, stable, has money). Are men to be blamed [...] 25yo woman with 35yo man "Women mak…
/r/MensRights09/11/25 06:27 PM
1

I have no feelings about it specifically. A couple has every right to decide how they want to divide the work in their shared life and for some this model works. However, I would take issue if this gendered role of "total provider" was being forced upon men. Fortunately, except within specific communities/cultural contexts men aren't really strong-armed into the total provider role. When it comes to traditional gender roles, men are usually harassed into maintaining those roles that benefit wome…
/r/MensRights09/11/25 03:54 AM
2

"I don't consider men to be people, and I don't want a partner or a relationship. However, I do feel I need a male animal for security, labor, and wealth when I want children and we'll choose to call that marriage." Feminists and many women have a pretense of beliefs, but it often seems they are really just playing out their evolutionary biology at a societal level. Lobbying government so social programs act as a wealth transfer from men to women and turning men into 'male animals' rather than h…
/r/MensRights09/11/25 01:33 AM
2

If by holding the door you mean opening it and then waving people through like a door man, then probably for anyone with a bunch of kids, a stroller, a lot of boxes or bags in their hand, or the elderly. If you mean just walking through first but doing that stretch or push thing in order to keep the door open for the next person coming through then I do that for everyone. I'd never do either for a woman on the basis of her sex alone.
/r/MensRights09/11/25 12:39 AM
11

Good list! Indeed it would be faster to list what isn't a lie or a myth. When your movement is based on narrative warfare you don't exactly stick to the facts. You just twist everything and say whatever it takes to get people on your side. Also: Retroactively calling the various women's groups that existed prior to the 1960's "first wave feminism" in an attempt to legitimize their own movement by establishing an historical continuity when in reality those groups had a wide array of ideologies an…
/r/MensRights09/11/25 12:32 AM
18

This isn't just social media - it's society in general. We are endlessly hammered with fearmongering about 'misogyny', but real misogyny is relative minor and isolated compared to misandry. The hatred of men is truly widespread and mainstream in western society. An entire generation of girls has been raised to denigrate and dehumanize men. They've been given a skewed portrait of men that shows them as foolish, dangerous, impulsive. The reason you see it most prominently on social media is the sa…
/r/MensRights08/11/25 08:41 PM
10

Author is a typical female supremacist loser who makes her dime off selling women their own victimhood and feeding the bitterness for men that leftover women feel. Her books and almost all her articles are about this. Whether you believe she is a grifter or simply has an axe to grind, there's little value in this kind of demagoguery for anyone outside the broken women who consume it.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 01:33 AM
2

Sexual politics. Women want things. Men want things. Create the narrative that men's wants are wrong and now the negotiating position of men is weakened. Any time the interests of men and women are at odds such a narrative will be put into play.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 12:28 AM
1

I feel like you turned left into economics when you should turned right towards biology.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 12:22 AM
80

Even more frustrating than the double standard is that it lies "My safety guidelines prohibit generating content that promotes or depicts sexual explicitness, including themes of cheating." Clearly that's a lie because it has no problem producing such a story for with a man as the cheater. I reproduced OPs experiment with google today and questioned that. It did admit to it's bias: AI models are trained on vast amounts of data from the internet, which unfortunately contains and perpetuates exist…
/r/MensRights02/11/25 05:28 PM
3

I understand what you're saying, but feminism is by far the greater enemy of the MRM. Let's look... Feminism today is based on identity politics and power narratives that divide society into camps: men as the oppressors and women as the oppressed. When men are treated as a collective power group responsible for systemic harm, it naturally encourages a negative view of them. If someone is convinced that men as a class are actively and continuously oppressing women, then anger, bitterness, and eve…
/r/MensRights02/11/25 03:23 AM
22

It's been working for a long time. Slowly and steadily. Mostly by simply providing a counter narrative to dogmatic orthodoxy of feminism and providing a platform for men to discuss common problems men face. There's a huge difference between facing unfairness and anti-male bias and being utterly alone, isolated, and persecuted vs finding this place and understanding that the dominant narrative is not the truth, that you weren't evil and wrong for finding something lacking in it, and that others a…
/r/MensRights31/10/25 11:57 PM
2

And there's one extra important dimension to this. It isn't just that words or actions are flirting to one woman and creepy to another, it's also how they perceive you physically. If you're not their type then you are creepy, and if you are then it's charming. In fact, she may even react badly based on external factors that have nothing to do with you at all and because we've "decided it's fine for her to socially shame" that's still a bad situation. So, there is no set of words, nor any specifi…
/r/MensRights30/10/25 01:22 PM
3

Women and Children is actually kind of outdated. The phrase I hear more often now is "women and girls". Atrocities against boys in multiple warzones and other catastrophes barely get attention and have failed to move the needle on public interest or sympathy for a long time now, but if such incidents involve girls - even if they involve both girls and boys - then coverage exists but focuses entirely on the girls.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 05:21 PM
1

Unfortunately, it's this way across the board now. Delusional and rabidly anti-male is now the typical for comics, cartoons, animations, movies, books, games, etc. Caped Crusader is just another on the pile. The male character are portrayed as corrupt, inept, cowardly while to be intelligent, composed, effective, and show resilience and resourcefulness. The male villains are presented as unstable, obsessive, and incompetent while the female villains are sharper, cunning, and often physically cap…
/r/MensRights23/10/25 03:28 AM
6

I'm sorry this happened to you. I knew that the system was rabidly hostile towards men but your situation is a stark reminder of exactly how much that is true. I can't help legally, but I just want to say that in your planning please consider the possibility that the child is not yours. It is possible to get pregnant from one encounter but it's actually pretty rare to do so and carry to term. If a woman claims to be pregnant after a one night stand or a single encounter you should become immedia…
/r/MensRights21/10/25 03:14 AM
5

There is no possible argument for it. It's just female privilege and institutionalized misandry. A little holdover that feminists just never worked up an appetite to address for some reason... Luckily, in general pressure on pension systems and the resulting pension system reforms are seeing broad equalization of retirement ages. A handful of eastern European countries not withstanding.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 03:54 AM
16

When you internalize a victim narrative like many women have, you begin to interpret every situation through that mindset. Anytime there's anything ambiguous about a situation you fill in the blanks with your own worldview. When a woman with this mindset gets dismissive treatment by a doctor the first thing that comes to mind is "It's because I'm a woman". Because the belief is a product of an ideology that's widespread among women, many women believe it and reinforce it with each other. It's a …
/r/MensRights19/10/25 03:37 PM
5

Hah - how poetic and true. Well let me know your global instructions or whatever because mine basically toes the party line - and the party line isn't exactly pro male.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 06:40 PM
5

There’s plenty of evidence to back it up - it’s just a short google away! I've googled this countless times over the years. There's no evidence. Here is what all the stats show: A very small percentage of rape accusations are proven true or false, and the vast majority are unknown. This is sadly what you'd expect for something that typically happens behind closed doors. there is nothing anti-male about it When you draw conclusions from incomplete information you use your own biases and experienc…
/r/MensRights12/10/25 06:38 PM
8

Just today I was asking ChatGPT about false accusations and it was an infuriating experience. It tried to hide the truth editorially and then it started doing narrative control and couching responses and slipping in straw man attacks. I eventually had to tell it to respond using math notation and logic to get neutrality and truth out of it.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 07:04 AM
54

So much flowery language and self-importance just to say she hates men and anything marketing towards them. She sees things explicitly made for the female point or view as “neutral” and anything made for the male point or view as evil.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 06:59 AM
12

“Only a tiny percentage of accusations are false” There’s no evidence to back up this claim. You are making one guess based on the information available and others are making their own guesses. You believe yours is right based on a a clear anti-male bias and a belief about accusations that is has no evidence. In reality there’s no reason to believe either guess right. Therefore we choose to trust op’s read because he was there and he knows these people and he knows this girl. If I were him I wou…
/r/MensRights12/10/25 06:54 AM
0

100%. I knew they were bad faith actors but I didn't think they'd be so obvious as to literally drop direct links to the controlled opposition.
/r/MensRights10/10/25 02:26 PM
1

You need to look up concern trolling. I don't care if posts like these are banned or not, but if you want the mods to support free speech and fielding of different opinions you have the responsibility to educate yourself on rhetoric and the strategies that bad faith actors use to undermine movements and transform online communities.
/r/MensRights10/10/25 02:23 PM
5

Are you capable of “retrospection” (self reflection)? Because you desperately crawl the sub looking for the smallest examples of misogyny in a sea of content and then use it to condemn an entire sub. Anyone can see you started with a goal in mind and worked backward with a biased point of view. The irony is that this very post proves you wrong. While you crawl in the dirt looking for anything resembling misogyny your post is allowed to stay up and form discussion and mods sticky a comment suppor…
/r/MensRights10/10/25 03:24 AM
2

A woman runs her boyfriend of a couple years over in a jealous rage that was totally unfounded. "she has trauma now" "lost the love of her life" "she's deeply sorry promise" "has her whole life ahead of her" "she murdered him but she also called an ambulance so she shouldn't go to jail" It literally sounds like everyone in the court room is smitten and acting on it without any reservation. Female privilege is mind boggling.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 01:13 PM
2

Your girlfriend has a pretty dehumanizing view of men, which kind of means she has a pretty low opinion of you. That's kind of sad man. Unfortunately, her beliefs are not uncommon these days. Despite men having authored poems, stories, and music about the human condition for over several millennia, modern society has no problem reducing men to base animals who are only interested in sex while ascribing dignity and humanity and the better angels of our nature to women. In reality men seek emotion…
/r/MensRights04/10/25 05:51 PM
2

No idea - I only know that it was banned and the quote I posted you is what they said at the time. As far as I know there's no public list or proof of which channels were banned as a result of pressure from the Biden admin. Now for the pure opinion piece: One could argue that it's reinstatement alone is proof that it falls into that category based on what Google admitted and pledged to do before the House Judiciary Committee. Speaking purely in terms of procedure, in order to unban StudioBrule g…
/r/MensRights04/10/25 05:20 PM
6

Yes, about four years ago now. This was the message at that time: Hello my friend, Things have got much worse since I last wrote. Steve applied to YouTube to set up a membership system, and YouTube decided to permanently ban the channel. The reason given is that the videos violated community standards and were harmful to members. Nothing more specific is (ever) given by YouTube, and no specific instances of the alleged violations are provided. [...] That's how YouTube is. For the past few years,…
/r/MensRights04/10/25 04:45 PM
12

This was during CNN's 2013 New Year's Eve broadcast. Kathy Griffith faced no professional, legal, or civil consequences and she was invited back by CNN in subsequent years to continue cohosting. She leaned into the incident and never apologized. Of course, if you swapped the genders (say a man did a double handed boob squeeze, positioned himself behind her and thrusted, or went for the crotch) the back lash would be immense and the man would never work again. Even within the context of mainstrea…
/r/MensRights04/10/25 04:40 PM
60

I think the original poster is right. Regret may be one reason - but girls/women could literally do it for almost any reason based on context. They might be doing it for attention, they might be doing it for regret, they might be doing it because their boyfriend or parents found out, they might be doing it out of spite because the man rejected them or made fun of them in third grade, or is playing the field instead of being exclusive. Maybe after the man didn't call or return her feelings. Maybe…
/r/MensRights04/10/25 04:25 PM
2

The thing is - Most content is already aimed primarily at a female audience. Your daytime tv, your soaps, most reality tv, true crime, romantic comedies and dramas, most sitcoms, etc. There has always been programing for women. That's just the market doing it's thing and that's ok. What you are seeing today is that shows which are traditionally male oriented are also being reworked to also appeal to female audiences. As you note, this is happening in overt ways like the women being smarter and b…
/r/MensRights03/10/25 04:49 PM
9

It's amazing how little agency they feel women have: Women are apparently too timid to revoke consent after providing it? If the man must continually get consent then what value does consent have? A woman can just claim consent was asked for or given immediately after any proof of consent was provided. Consent works well as a cultural institution, but it's totally meaningless as a tool in an fair and just legal system under these conditions. This is really just one more bludgeon in the legal sys…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 07:03 PM
2

But who says dating is not an "actual" men's right issue? Men's issues can be thought of as falling into three categories. First, legal issues: conscription, family law, reproductive rights, and domestic violence legislation. Second, institutional issues: sentencing disparities, unequal outcomes in schools and courts, workplace safety, health services, and lack of support structures. Third, cultural issues: norms around masculinity, family roles, body image, and dating. It's easy to dismiss cult…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 01:02 AM
2

You said everything I wanted to say and much more succinctly. Kudos.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 12:55 AM
4

Your version of historical events. Your focus on how men just attack feminism and apparently don't organize. Your seeming ignorance of what MRA's have dealt with historically and today (MRAs have organized many times as the result was picketing, harassment, death threats, cancellation, etc). The fact that you've spam posted this across multiple subreddits. This reeks of agenda. What's your angle, op? There are so many things to unpack in the male advocacy vs female advocacy discussion but I don'…
/r/MensRights26/09/25 03:01 PM
1

Just because you don't understand what you read doesn't make it confused - it just makes you confused. In any case, still holding my breath for your hard hitting posts on government oppression and healthcare. Surely you aren't here to just whine? Be the change you want to see.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 03:04 PM
2

This is the dumbest shit I've ever read. Why would men not be able to make posts calling out perceived unfairness in work/industries or in the culture generally? Feminism operates almost exclusively within a cultural context so why do you feel male advocacy must only focus on institutional and legal issues? Is there some quota on posts I'm not aware of where each one must be the hardest hitting deep cut men's issues? Does this post seem trivial to you because you lack the intelligence to abstrac…
/r/MensRights22/09/25 02:37 AM
7

Funny how it works: She can insult him and she's an asshole. If he insults her then he's the asshole and an incel. One commenter said she was "teasing" him while he "attacked her" but actually it's the opposite. She complained about regretful encounters and she complained about not finding a good man. Throwing her own complaints back at her is closer to teasing even if it was insulting. Meanwhile, she attacked his identity and beliefs and tried to tear him down and the bullying was constant and …
/r/MensRights16/09/25 07:35 PM
16

Sadly anti-male sentiment is at a fever pitch in the UK. The government is strictly anti-male, the police are anti-male, and the people are heavily propagandized to be anti-male. Certain Netflix documentaries, for example. The article makes a point to say that he was under immense pressure by police and he killed himself following the girl withdrawing her claims with police. It's important to note that in these cases the police are often just the pointy end of the stick. He probably faced unendi…
/r/MensRights16/09/25 07:20 PM
4

All women want your money. Money, or power, or status. What most women would call "security". That's hypergamy and it's a constant across the board. So the question is simply this: How are you treated by the woman you are with? Anyway, here's another question: Why do they care so much if some men date or marry foreign women? The answer is evolutionary psychology. Western women often make moral crusades and demonize men when they feel threatened in the sexual market place. You'll see the same beh…
/r/MensRights15/09/25 03:00 AM
1

He was a political commentator and loved by many. He wasn't placed into that position, but grew into it by saying and fighting for causes that were deeply meaningful to others - people like you. We often do not know why something comes into our lives and affects us so deeply. A small flame in the darkness that gives us a direction to crawl towards when we are brought low. A life line. I'm very glad that Charlie Kirk was able to be that light in the darkness for you. That, through him, you found …
/r/MensRights11/09/25 12:10 PM
5

They can't. The left got out of the individualistic equality game and into the identity politics game and when you do that you have no choice but to create a common enemy in order to build solidarity among the other groups. The left has made a scapegoat of men. Men represent the past. Men represent oppression. Men represent domination. Men represent patriarchy. Men represent privilege. Men represent hierarchy. Men represent exclusion. Men represent control. By casting men as oppressors you creat…
/r/MensRights07/09/25 02:49 PM
13

Ah - the religion has sent a missionary to your country. An ideological fungus has sporulated and a spore seeks out your country as a new environment to germinate.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 12:29 PM
23

Shrekking is a new term for an old dating strategy where individuals (mostly women) date significantly less attractive men (by the norms of their society), hoping that by lowering their standards, they will wield more power in the relationship. Wow, if genders were reversed this would be called some serious "red pill" "incel" shit. They are orienting their entire dating around having more power than a partner so as to better exploit them. This is just broken toxic women dating men who are actual…
/r/MensRights31/08/25 05:05 PM
15

Implicit trauma gained by simply existing in a patriarchal society. The same society that privileges them at every turn, serves them primarily in all public institutions, and considers them above all other groups.
/r/MensRights31/08/25 04:50 PM
1

What does it mean to say "without laws"? Do you mean if we lived as we do now except laws magically ceased to exist? If so, it's not a useful question because the way we live now exists because laws exist and if they did not we would live very differently. However, if we instead look at the historical picture we can get an idea of what it was actually like before "laws" existed. The answer to the question then is: No. From time immemorial human tribes have protected women and punished those who …
/r/MensRights30/08/25 10:33 PM
1

Unfortunately, where demand exists supply will be created. One way or the other.
/r/MensRights30/08/25 06:01 PM
14

So why is society being nonchalant about this Because this isn't about over correction. Any society that was dispassionately correcting for equality would have seen how much men are struggling and reoriented a long time ago. This is a consequence of how feminists and the far left have built their power base. There's a reason the information about men's issues is - as you say - "censored or blacked-out". There's a reason even discussing men's issues gives many a visceral emotional reaction of ang…
/r/MensRights30/08/25 05:55 PM
2

Source: reddit
/r/MensRights29/08/25 09:37 PM
5

She showed you what kind of person she was at every single opportunity. She seems completely self centered and self serving even to the point of your health, and even expects you at her beck and call like you are a slave. She places her needs first and sees you as a means to an end. She places herself above you and talks down to you with no respect. Do you ever reach decisions together or do you just fight until she gets her way? Further she is also an abuser. She's abusive to you, uses your tra…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 09:25 PM
9

Something you'll find among women is the implicit assumption that their preferences should dictate male behavior. It's not an accident - all of society centers women and modern moral sensibility is roughly aligned with what women want and what is best for them. The result is girls grow up with the unquestioned assumption that they will be given special treatment. I'm sure we've all heard what a real man is. How men not sacrificing their safety to defend random woman are emasculated. How men are …
/r/MensRights29/08/25 08:57 PM
26

Came here to say this. A move like this lays naked the truth of western societies attitude towards men: disposable. When you are slapped with a helmet and a rifle and poked in the back with a cattle prod by a country that has spit on you, vilified you, and actively worked to make your life miserable and close opportunities for you. When it's all stick and no carrot then that's just indentured servitude at the barrel of a gun (or the threat of imprisonment).
/r/MensRights28/08/25 05:34 PM
1

Radical feminist views don't make sense You don't say. The left has always had a love affair with tabula rasa - and the more extreme their politics the more hardline their belief.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 03:52 AM
14

In the latest incarnation of 'men are defective women' we have some women projecting their own preferences on to men only to be shocked to find out men don't actually share them. They are so into themselves that they actually attach morality to this based on nothing but their own preference. That is par for the course, but what is surprising is that anyone can blind themselves to something so blatantly obvious and ubiquitous in our society. Anyone growing up with a functioning brain should alrea…
/r/MensRights18/08/25 03:59 AM
35

"We took opportunities away from boys. We deprioritized boys. We demonized boys. When they stumbled, fell, or dropped out we spit on them and criticized them more. We celebrated their fall." Also somehow - against all expectation - Surprised Pikachu face when "Britain's world standing at risk due to chronic lower results at GCSE". This is typical of the entire narrative about boys issues in Britain. The chief concern is never the boys - but what their opting out represents for the country and wo…
/r/MensRights17/08/25 03:57 AM
6

Yeah the only source is a "now deleted reddit post". Even if it actually happened it's also being totally condemned. The survey that exists on Daily Mail site has 97% people voting "The girlfriend - she bullied and humiliated her partner" over 3% voting "The boyfriend - it was just a prank, he was too sensitive". All the comments condemning the behavior are highly upvoted. So in terms of issues men face with double standards this one seems to have taken care of itself. In the context of men's ri…
/r/MensRights17/08/25 03:50 AM
4

“Men kill men” doesn’t make those deaths any less real or worth preventing. If you think it matters less because the killers are also often men, you’ve shifted from caring about harm to simply picking sides in a gender war.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 04:51 AM
16

Not even the most depraved misogynist - not even a deranged lunatic - could even hope to approach the level of unreality, hatred, delusion, bitterness of the average woman on Tiktok. It's almost fascinating. It should be studied. There's basically femcels - who will flick each other's beans furiously with little catch phrases while frothing at the mouth about stories that aren't even true and no data supports. They swing wildly, one moment demanding the total eradication of all men and spitting …
/r/MensRights12/08/25 03:27 AM
2

You'd be absolutely correct in a world of pure narrative. Fortunately we can collect data and challenge narratives. Those with narratives that can be disproven with data may simply continue to assert they are true but the argument isn't really to convince them, but everyone else. The truth is that Feminist narratives rarely hold up to any real scrutiny at all.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 01:44 AM
66

I mean, what discrimination? Women fare better in every interaction with public institutions, and when they don’t, those institutions are often redesigned to ensure that outcome. Public schools were remade to the benefit of girls at the expense of boys, with curriculum and discipline approaches shifting toward areas where girls excel (language-heavy learning, reduced competition, group work) and away from areas where boys historically thrived (structured discipline, competitive play, hands-on te…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 01:42 AM
10

The problem with the Marxist meme that powers feminist ideology is that it defines a process for political change rather than a goal; endless dialectic with only a utopian vision called "equality" as the end state. But when is 'equality' achieved? In practical terms there's no stop button. No measurable goal, no KPI, no specific issue that when solved means feminists put down the sword. It's a meme that just proliferates itself forever. Such political ideologies are tools which can be used to ef…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 01:30 AM
9

This is actually a common psychological problem for people who adopt a word view that has oppression narratives based on their identity. They start to interpret every slight, every set back, every negative interaction as being a function of their identity. That's just how humans function - we fill in the unknowns with our own world view. That works very well when the person has a realistic world view based on lived experience, unfortunately, many of these political ideologies train peoples brain…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 01:14 AM
1

Moderators are not doing their job. They fall over themselves to delete posts on behalf of admin but allow e-drama shit and brigading across subreddits? In that case won't take much for a bad actor to get this sub banned. This isn't productive.
/r/MensRights10/08/25 04:28 AM
7

Another thing I noticed. In a lot of media these days redemption is only for women. If men commit evil then that is what they are, women can commit evil but can be redeemed. Another.. often if men aren't portrayed as buffoons then they are portrayed as the corrupt, tired, old guard who need to pass the banner on before fading away.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 05:27 AM
3

Ah, I see. Everything that contradicts your preconceived biases must be a lie, twisted, or reframed. Anything that confirms them is accepted without question. Yawn. If anyone who disagrees with you is automatically a liar, then you can't possibly change your opinion - so why bother engaging at all? Most people here understand that what you're saying isn't true, and none of your responses to what I said are even close to coherent or logical. I'm not sure what you think you'll accomplish or who yo…
/r/MensRights06/08/25 04:34 AM
12

Uh 1500s? I hear women start fights using their boyfriends as leverage every weekend at the bar. And when the fight breaks out she’s cheering. If her boyfriend wins she yells abuse. She literally wields his violence as an extension of herself. There are also expectations of it. If a guy mistreats your sister at school, it’s implicit understood you need to have words and protect her. Boys who don’t would be shamed. The same went down all the time in high school as well. Every day online I see wom…
/r/MensRights05/08/25 09:10 PM
13

This is Men’s rights so let’s focus on letting men take on whatever traits they want whether they are progressive or traditional. Focusing on freeing men from the shame and punishment of violating norms and doing their own thing does not mean we need to demonize existing norms. Just like women should not be shamed for being housewives even as we allow women to choose other paths as well. A man who wants to be a provider is not the enemy, but those who wish to force all men to be are.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 09:03 PM
1

This is definitely ChatGPT or similar output. What do you think in your own words?
/r/MensRights05/08/25 03:37 AM
38

If you want to know the degree to which a group in society is scapegoated and denigrated and dehumanized, then look at the assumptions people make when dealing with unknowns in a situation involving that group. When people don't have all the information they tend to fill in the details from their own imaginations. Their own biases. Their own worldview. And here we have a video with no context. Just a woman attempting lifting a kid out of a car and losing her balance and falling. What do the audi…
/r/MensRights05/08/25 03:36 AM
6

As with anything not explicitly gatekept; feminist women will move in, co-opt it, and redirect towards their causes, consuming all the resources until it dies.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 03:29 AM
4

There are certain rhetorical constructs that let the people who use them 'move the goal posts'. Toxic masculinity is one of them. In normal use of the term they will refer to all masculine traits as toxic and men as toxic and hold up the feminine as a rule. Men are bad. Male oriented behaviors are bad. If you challenge them - and they don't have the mob on their side - then only then do they fall back and say it's it refers to cultural norms associated with traditional male behavior that are har…
/r/MensRights05/08/25 12:08 AM
12

Feminists continue to be the absolute unchallenged best in class when it comes to self damage.
/r/MensRights04/08/25 05:42 AM
3

"anti helpful" ? I think it's very helpful. A personal account and testimony can help validate the experiences of other men who have felt dismissed or marginalized in therapeutic settings. This can reduce feelings of isolation or self-doubt. Highlights systemic issues. It raises concerns about gender bias in psychology and paves the way for critical reflection on how the field is influenced by ideological and institutional factors. It raises the APA guidelines as a starting point for this reflec…
/r/MensRights03/08/25 01:15 AM
28

Just your daily reminder that Reeves is controlled opposition. He's the "menslib" of discourse on men. He's one answer the democrats have for losing the male vote. His job is capture the energy male advocacy has built up and dispel it safely in a way that will win votes for Democrats and put male advocacy under the umbrella of prevailing gender paradigms. There is some value in Reeves technocratic and incremental approach to boys issues. Just because his work is aligned with Democratic electoral…
/r/MensRights02/08/25 11:23 PM
25

Half the population? Did you just confuse women with feminism? Are you a bad faith actor or just ignorant/naive?
/r/MensRights02/08/25 10:56 PM
53

Feminism is just female supremacy and misandry. They say "we care about men" but then they treat you like a literal traitor if you actually discuss men's issues and reserve the most degrading language and bullying for you. The problem is two fold. First, feminism has total control of the gender narrative today. If they actually said "We don't care about men you're on your own" then male advocates might actually organize and threaten their position. Feminists would be beside themselves if a singl…
/r/MensRights02/08/25 10:44 PM
1

Should men hold women accountable as a group? No, but we should hold everyone accountable. Don’t vote for women. Don’t respect women. Women need to do better. Women - as a group - need to rebuild trust. Don't vote for women who have anti-male policies. Don't respect women who are bad-faith actors. Everyone needs to do better in addressing ways in which men are struggling in society. Society needs to build trust with men who are opting out due to anti-male policies. You have to understand that th…
/r/MensRights02/08/25 06:23 PM
3

Unfortunately, even if you found a male therapist he likely wouldn't be helpful to a male victim. He may not feel the personal hatred for you a woman will but he's still a product of his field. A huge amount of people in psych are misandrist women that actively couple their misandry with the field. Misandry in text books, misandry in policy, misandry ideologically. There was a period in my life where I sought therapy and I saw three therapists: Two women and one man. All three in various context…
/r/MensRights02/08/25 05:10 PM
7

Unfortunately, just one more data point in a long list. There is a long history with a great amount of supporting data: *Men face far harsher sentencing compared to women for all crimes even with identical criminal histories. * To such an extent that for many classes of crimes women usually never face the idea of going to prison at all. All feminist issues put together into one super issue could not hope to even touch the magnitude of the inequality men face in the criminal justice system and if…
/r/MensRights02/08/25 05:04 PM
39

Exactly correct. In many ways, it's about the collapse of male only spaces. Especially those which are community oriented and can also accommodate older men. Young men today probably have no notion of this; but there used to be a lot of fraternal organizations that did community work and functioned as social groups for men. Today they are basically decimated and shuttered. These organizations were important social structures for men because - for various reasons - relationships tend to align aro…
/r/MensRights02/08/25 04:20 PM
3

The reason is power. Feminism has the market cornered on gender issues in society. They use this position to construct narratives and an interpretation of history that creates concern and belief, and concern turns into funding, special considerations and dispensations, legislation in their favor and many other advantages and indeed it's. All public institutions and corporations now bow to feminism and the media apparatus now generates a continuous stream of propaganda to this effect. However, fe…
/r/MensRights02/08/25 03:58 PM
4

Men are more likely to die from violent crime. Men are more likely to be victims of all forms of violent crime - including homicide. The only exception to this is sexual assault which, by definition, does not inherently kill. However, if you include prison rape then men are far more likely to be victims of sexual assault as well. Given that prison rape is treated as a punchline by much of society and implicitly condoned within prisons that pretty squarely falls into misandry. Men are more likely…
/r/MensRights30/07/25 04:31 PM
53

A microcosm of society. A jealous, ugly, bitter woman is taking glee in what she perceives is hurting men because she's has developed ressentiment from being rejected all her life. Irony. Men really only care only so much as it matters to women. Women are the ones who obsess over penis size. If penis sizes are shrinking, the main people affected would be women - presuming they like larger penises. Her hatred has blinded her to reason. Second irony. The article is actually about a decline in sper…
/r/MensRights28/07/25 05:03 AM
5

Unfortunately, we've all been propagandized into having a lack of empathy for men that has a dampening effect on anti-male rhetoric. There used to be a sub that found misandrist hatred in post, comments, and blogs and substitutes "men" for "other groups" to bypass this programmed bias and reveal how crazy anti-male rhetoric has really become.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 06:33 PM
5

It’s like women can do no wrong and are perfect angels but men are just straight up evil and need to be blamed as a collective and directly. This is how hate works. It let's you take all the evils of the world - especially those of your own in-group - and project them on to the group you hate. Everyone else becomes more innocent and the scapegoated group becomes more guilty, more evil, more Machiavellian. This is how feminism works mechanistically. It makes women and men into separate tribes and…
/r/MensRights27/07/25 04:19 AM
8

You contradicted yourself. "It isn't real" and "Men need male friends". The Male loneliness epidemic was always about the loss of close male friendships. It was never about women. Even if women were "just as lonely" as men it wouldn't invalidate the concept because the reasons for men being lonely are unique to men and worth exploring regardless of how lonely women are. But, MLE refers to the loss of male friendships and fraternal organizations since the 90s - which the data definitely supports.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 01:30 AM
11

The "autistic girls must mask autistic men are coddled" is a meme that's been floating around among the femcel crowd for years. They read that autism is more recognizable in boys and they just made up a story about that without any evidence based on their hatred of men. A more likely story base on actual scientific evidence that is that society just has a much more patience and forgiveness for girls who act aberrantly to the norm. Being weird for a girl isn't really a deal breaker; and is often …
/r/MensRights26/07/25 08:04 PM
6

If they admit their privilege they given up their power. Their power is based on others solving their problems for them. So, paradoxically, the more privilege they have the more they have to complain about how they have it rough.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 08:01 PM
8

It was always just a marketing gimmick so they were always going to phone it in. It is ironic that it serves as a "get me a female driver" feature as well.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 07:52 PM
8

This subreddit allows misandry to get downvoted. Feminists would just ban "misogynist" lurkers. Feminists subreddits also ban anyone who says anything that cuts against dogma in general. Feminists subreddits also ban people who posted in other subreddits they happen to not like before a comment can even be made. The movement is a hate factory that can't stand up to any logical or factual scrutiny so they raise walls, high walls surrounding the cloister.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 02:48 AM
18

The real danger here is what is coming. It's been obvious for a long time that these men were innocent and the sex was consensual. Despite that, feminist special interest groups have been screeching at a fever pitch and stirring irrational women into a frenzy in an attempt to gain leverage to change the system. This isn't really about hockey players. It's about special interest groups clawing for special rules and considerations for woman who make accusations. Things like forcing juries and cour…
/r/MensRights26/07/25 02:40 AM
8

If it's anything like "Are we dating the same guy?" Facebook groups, then your story is unfortunately the standard for Tea. The vast majority of the posts are just breakups, rejections, or bad dates. Things didn't go their way, so they become angry and lash out by doing cheap and easy reputational damage. It's also a good way to control the sympathies of the divided friend group following a breakup. There's also no shortage of woman who post a lot of faked evidence for other men in their lives t…
/r/MensRights25/07/25 01:41 AM
28

Ukrainian women are being mobilized - right out of the country as they abandon home and emigrate to western countries. Those that have chosen to remain are also engaging in white feather style campaigns and helping round up men at home.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 01:32 AM
3

You're wasting your time. No one has ever confirmed their bias more than the person you are responding to. They make evidentiary claims to burden other but offers none to back up all their own assertions and anecdotes. When faced with evidence they are wrong they retreat to the 'letter of the law' in order to claim the evidence can't be true because the rules say so. When they lose ground on that position they start making semantic arguments. It's all rhetorical tricks, putting immense burden on…
/r/MensRights25/07/25 01:27 AM
3

The line on a graph that tracks socioeconomic power of women and the line on the graph that shows equity replacing equality within our society are the same line. Equity justifies leveling the playing field for specific identity groups, which let's women continue to give themselves freebies and advantages even when they are the most privileged group in the history of our species as long as they keep spinning oppression narratives.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 01:06 AM
5

It seems to me that conservatives have "designs" on men. They want to use men, so they pay more lip service to men. However, you're only good if you stay in your lane, act how they want you to act, be what they want you to be. Meanwhile progressives just hate men and want them dead.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 01:01 AM
28

Every single thing they've ever said about men, patriarchy, oppression, mistreatment ... was all projection. It's not what happened, but it's what they would do if they had the power to do so.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 12:58 AM
8

Yes, but abandoning the pretense of equality by taking the mask off entirely is still a significant act. It's akin to the difference between a train company that begrudgingly lets you take the train each morning vs the company banning you entirely. The road from anti-male bias to anti-male law and signifies a trend and a will to further misandrist laws and structures.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 12:56 AM
11

Response to a mod saying "Let's try to turn the volume down sexist generalizations about men and women"? Absolute shit fit. Apparently not being able to make sexist generalizations about men makes women unsafe and unheard. My personal fav is the women who has "de-centered men" by making her entire personality about obsessively hating men to the point where being told she can't explicitly hate men is a bridge too far. Absolute cinema. Unfortunately, a hatred of levels never before seen has been g…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 09:12 PM
1

I'm struggling to see anything in this.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 04:20 AM
4

It's always the same twisted math. "Most assaults are commit by men so therefore it's an epidemic of violence against women and women need special consideration." "Over 75% of victims are women" These are very convenient statistics if you wanna wage gender war. However, if you want to gauge actual risk then you need to look at the number of actual assaults, not the proportion of perpetrators or victims. According to published safety data, the likelihood of a rider being sexually assaulted on a r…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 03:21 AM
12

I would guess the percentage of males who are victims of domestic abuse is far higher than females across all ages. The younger generation is just the first that has enough knowledge to consider reporting it.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 08:53 PM
4

The core structure of feminism is that men and women are two distinct identity groups, that the man group has more power, and that they use that power to dominate and oppress the woman group. That is called power dynamics and identity politics. It's a way to build solidarity among women by scapegoating men as a shared enemy. It also generates anger at perceived in justice which can be converted into political action. Additionally, when you perceive yourself as the weaker and exploited group it e…
/r/MensRights16/07/25 05:42 PM
26

I find it so weird that this comes up over and over again and people believe this. It was never about equality. It was always a female supremacist movement full of misandry. I used to write lengthy rebuttals to this but I'm tired boss, so I'll just drop a few quotes from 'early feminists' that should more than put the lie to rest: "To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking dildo." - Valerie Solanis, SCUM Manifesto, 1967 "I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and via…
/r/MensRights16/07/25 05:27 PM
70

Six thousand five hundred years of male authors, poets, song writers, philosophers, playwriters, and theologians creating untold amounts of works describing and exploring empathy and the human condition in exquisite detail from the dark depths of deepest sorrow to the soaring heights of joy... totally undone by a few decades of a rabidly toxic and hateful anti-male ideology taking grip of the culture. Where people are so propagandized into hate that they now only ascribe the negative and animali…
/r/MensRights16/07/25 05:04 PM
3

No you aren't reading too much into this. What you are describing is the difference between equality and equity. "Equality under equal conditions" is the same thing as "equity". Equity already provides a framework that justifies extra perks for specific identity groups.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 10:06 PM
3

Four downvotes is not "This sub". He's being downvoted because the context of the post is "underage boys who have sex with underage girls is considered rape" so the comment made about consensual sex would be assumed to be in this context as well. By responding to it pretending it was a context free statement feels like a straw man type representation of what was said. Your comment is being downvoted because you are carrying forward the same bad faith argument in almost comical fashion. It's like…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 03:39 AM
4

Unfortunately, we live in a world where being 'woman owned' can unlock special privileges. In app listings, in marketing and advertising, in getting funding, etc.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 03:03 AM
1

Unfortunate human nature. White knight simping behavior increases exponentially the closer you get to the kink. Sex is the singularity at which these values become so wild as to be undefined. There's not much out there people are more irrational about than sex. You fucked with the bag, so people lashed out.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 05:47 PM
4

When you look at what feminism does instead of what feminism claims to be you will understand what feminism is.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 05:28 PM
7

It's even worse than that, because the feminist lobby is so powerful that governments bow before it they are able to get their hatred of men turned into policy. Even a word so obviously about hatred and supremacy and dehumanization as 'femicide' is starting to appear in legislation.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 05:28 PM
2

I'm not sure anything you said really addresses anything in my own comment, which was about the gendered double standards around abortion and the idea that this double standard affects the ways that child support programs are administered. However, I'll respond anyway. If you think child support means men are fully financially supporting the child you are sorely mistaken No one said this. It can happen but it's pretty rare. Under the "income shares model" which is used in many states, if the cus…
/r/MensRights13/07/25 07:03 AM
8

This isn't explicitly about this post, but every now and again a post like this comes up where someone has been duped into playing the 'reputation' game: "If only we had a better reputation then we'd be taken seriously!" Often the person has internalized the negative societal narratives about men and then come here and make a plea for men to be better(tm). Unfortunately, It's a losing game. One where you spend more time and energy in disproving the false slanders against men than actually bringi…
/r/MensRights12/07/25 10:59 PM
3

Your friend says women are justified in hating men due to their ideology which imports an historical narrative that assumes system frustration and long term oppression as factual. Sure, and from Hitler's perspective hating the Jews was also justified by a history informed by his ideology. It's a bit of a self reinforcing delusion, isn't it? Making up a post-hoc narrative structure that frames history as oppressive and then using that to justify hate is itself an expression of hate. Hate had to c…
/r/MensRights12/07/25 05:50 PM
4

The democrats have chosen to scapegoat men as a group for years in order to build solidarity among the others. They accepted feminism as their state religion, and then they cast men as the villain. If this practice were simply pragmatic on their part then they might have still found a way to reach men, but it's their true belief. They really do hate men. Consequently, their outreach fails because they really assume their scapegoat narratives are actually true: Men are unclean, abusers, oppressor…
/r/MensRights12/07/25 06:01 AM
7

Consider that primary beneficiaries of patriarchy are women. There's a few elites at the top, then all women, then the rest of men. It was that way in the past and it's still that way today. The only thing that's changed today is the shape that benevolent sexism has taken. Remember - although women's suffrage was an inevitable outcome of the second industrial revolution and accelerated by world war 1, the main argument against it was not "we need to keep women down", it was that "politics is too…
/r/MensRights12/07/25 04:49 AM
1

Yes I meant someone posted the video to social media as it was happening and so security and the stadium were forced to act and remove her.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 02:08 PM
8

However, LaPointe, the main teacher in the classroom, also resigned, but was able to find work at another nearby school district, at Hopper Primary in Houston. Schools run more point defense for female teachers than the catholic church ever did for priests.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 10:50 PM
3

For those that don't know, this is just a business built off the equally disgusting "Are we dating the same guy?" Facebook groups that terrible women use. It's absolutely rampant with lies and false accusations. It's basically revenge porn for women.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 10:44 PM
3

A whole lot of people here are making arguments that men just wanna get laid etc, but I don't see it that way. Someone who just wants to get laid can just go pay a prostitute. That isn't why men are addicted to thot streams, chat services, and only fans. They are desperately seeking a meaningful connection, and they are willing to subsist on low calorie gruel than go without entirely.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 10:39 PM
6

Oh it ms far worse than that. Johnny Depp also lost all his parts, got fired, his reputation is still in ruins and his professional prospects are still curbed.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 12:59 AM
77

Swap genders. Jail time. Mob justice.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 11:03 PM
28

Someone probably posted it to social media forcing their hand.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 11:03 PM
12

I hate the double standard in arguments like "Should have kept it in your pants" or "He got her pregnant." When abortion comes up, the same women that take a hard line on men abstaining from sex are horrified if someone says "Should have kept your legs closed". This also reflects a double standard where women have agency only when it benefits them. When it comes to pregnancy, it's suddenly "He did this to her" and not "They did this together". I'm not sure why the government can't administer chi…
/r/MensRights09/07/25 06:02 PM
45

Men are always the primary victims in war. They are shipped off to fight and die. They get treated as cowards and are made the target of white feather campaigns at home. Much of the humanitarian support that enters war zones is set aside specifically for women and children. And refugee programs preferentially select for women and children as well. Of course, when your own government has mandatory conscription for males only they aren't going to let you leave anyway. If you are an single older ma…
/r/MensRights09/07/25 05:48 PM
3

100%. I was gong to add that women were under-reported but decided not to muddy things too much.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 04:38 AM
37

Your reasoning is flawed and it seems you don't really understand proportionality well. As you've pointed out, the vast majority of child predators are male. That's a great statistic if you want to demonize men, spread fear, or engage in gender war. However, it's a totally useless statistic for policy because it doesn't answer the important question: What percentage of men actually engage in child predation? It's significantly less than 1% of men. Any discriminatory policy based on gender at tho…
/r/MensRights07/07/25 01:24 AM
33

The argument you'll read online is: "The overwhelming majority of child sex offenders are male so this makes sense." This reasoning is flawed. Yes, most identified offenders are male, but the percentage of men who commit these crimes is extremely small. Well under 1%, likely in the tenths of a percent. So while men are statistically more likely to offend than women, the vast majority of men do not offend. Using group-level statistics to justify blanket bans punishes millions for the actions of a…
/r/MensRights07/07/25 01:06 AM
6

Well there you have it. Plain as day in black and white. No more inference or hidden layers. Males are expected to sacrifice and be sacrificed for others. Seeing as this guy thinks boys are simply beasts of burden, we'll use an animal metaphor to point out the flaw in his reasoning. He's suggesting using the cattle prod to force men into producing, but the cattle prod will only get you so far if you refuse to feed and nourish the cattle. If the animal has collapsed from starvation and neglect yo…
/r/MensRights06/07/25 09:17 PM
4

The idea that an AI like ChatGPT is just a reflection of it's training data is naive. Although the bias in training data is definitely present in the final output, if an LLM was based purely on it's training data it would be totally schizophrenic, switch tone and emotional affect constantly, and contradict itself. A conversational AI like ChatGPT goes through several layers of both supervised and unsupervised learning in order to provide a consistent perspective, tone, and ideology. OpenAI pays …
/r/MensRights06/07/25 06:29 AM
6

Men have never been more attractive than they are today. Men are more fashion and health conscious than ever before. However, you can't view it from a male perspective alone. There are many factors in play.. here are some thoughts on things that may be in play: Women are hypergamous. As society has retooled itself to serve women, they end up in positions of higher socioeconomic status out of school. This removes a lot of attraction towards most men right away. If you aren't above her in socioeco…
/r/MensRights06/07/25 06:13 AM
2

Yes, people took her side because you are a man. Next time if you decide to leave mention it briefly before going and then don't ever come back once you do. Anyway, it's nothing you need to worry about because you'll be dropping her like a sack of potatoes and moving on with your life.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 05:32 AM
11

Women cheat. Women most affected.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 04:25 PM
2

You're right. I think as humans we like to assign blame in conflict and and see one party as bad and one as good. In reality, when things go wrong it's often people together that isn't working. It's the situation itself. That's why I tried to focus my comment not on blame or malice for anyone, but on escaping that situation and finding a new stable one.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 05:53 PM
5

You need to recognize two things: This is abuse. Look at the checklist. Making insulting and belittling remarks about your gender. Denying your experiences and emotions and making you doubt reality (can't know because man, can't know because not working class). Creating an environment of fear, tension, or hostility. They are systematically undermining your dignity, identity, and emotional well-being. This is abuse. This is dangerous. Women hold significant social power in the domestic arena and …
/r/MensRights30/06/25 04:39 PM
6

Remember, simply "criticizing feminism" gets you labelled as misogynistic and extremist these days.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 02:10 AM
2

I honestly hate the "raw training data" argument. It's true - but as you said, a program like ChatGPT goes through several layers of both supervised and unsupervised training beyond that. On one hand, you have to do that or the LLM would seem schizo - on the other hand OpenAI pays a lot of money to give it a very particular consistent ideological stance.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 01:58 AM
3

Honestly, a badge of honor. In a world where men advocating for themselves is considered misogyny, extremism, even terrorism then being labelled as such is a mark of positive distinction.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 01:56 AM
8

menslib is a torture chamber of misandry. It's a honeypot for men who are seeking help and controlled opposition. Men go there with their problems and are forced to self flagellate and prostrate themselves before the feminist agenda. The single most common phrase there is "I know women have it worse but..."
/r/MensRights29/06/25 01:51 AM
2

If anything that painted women in an unflattering light was posted to news or any of the main subs they’d just delete it.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 12:22 AM
3

You’re just portraying the double standard. Do you think every male teacher who slept with a female student was an ugly bastard or troll? No one says “He had sex with his teenaged student but gotta admit he is an attractive man !”
/r/MensRights29/06/25 12:19 AM
0

Unfortunately a society that runs a mainstream philosophy based on identity politics and power dynamics can never do this. When people meet someone new their brains will project their own knowledge and beliefs on to that person. A focus on identity politics gives people really simplistic ready made answers for entire groups of people and ignores all other context. Power dynamics will rob people of all empathy or consideration for others if their identity narrative casts them as the villain. In o…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 12:15 AM
1

You have to understand that they say is just rhetoric. None of it is true, they don’t necessarily believe any of it. It’s just rhetorical games designed so they come out on top. Why do you think everything they say is so self contradictory in sum? Why do you think all their claims are never backed up by data? All the double standards and doubling down? Why do so many of their arguments double as reframing devices? It’s just a bunch of tactical word games, reframing things as this and that so tha…
/r/MensRights28/06/25 11:57 PM
39

No, feminism in the 1960s was probably it's most violent and hateful form. For example, prominent and celebrated feminists advocated culling the male population. The main difference today is that instead of being relatively contained within academia the internet has allowed it to spread into mainstream culture. Now most younger women everywhere - many who have never considered feminism - passively spread hatred the movement taught.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 04:36 AM
9

It's important to note that Feminist started in the 1960s and it's philosophy of patriarchy, identity politics and power dynamics (men as oppressor, women as victim class) creating anger that can be converted into political action as a form of dialectic with a mythical end state is marxist in origin. Feminists of the 1960s co-opted earlier women's movements so it could sell itself as an ongoing tradition. They called it "first wave feminism" even though none of those earlier groups called themse…
/r/MensRights28/06/25 04:32 AM
24

My other fav trope is the “Planet where women are in charge” which they always try to sell as the shoe being on the other foot, but are all hellholes where men are brutally oppressed beyond anything women ever experienced.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 10:02 PM
3

People that police what people find funny are worse than rapists. woooo boy
/r/MensRights27/06/25 10:00 PM
14

Disagreeing with a woman? Oh you mean "mansplaining"! Under new guidance that'll be domestic terrorism for you. We can't abide by this extremist rhetoric.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 02:08 PM
10

You may be viewing it from the point of a view of a man. If men act this way it's a sign of insecurity.. but what do you call it when it's en masse, everywhere, across time, and cross-cultural?
/r/MensRights22/06/25 11:19 PM
14

It's something you never forget. I used to think breaking the gender propaganda was coming to realize that women were not the better angels of our natures as I was repeatedly lied to about on television and media; they could be every bit as nasty and selfish and cruel as any man. Little did I know I was only half way there.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 11:17 PM
10

Remember, all the wild and crazy oppression narratives they came up with were always projection. It's what they would do if they had power, and so it's what they imagined men would do. Gunna be a bumpy ride.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 11:14 PM
6

Imagine having the red carpet rolled out for you. Public school designed for your success, easier admissions, more scholarships, more grants, more support in university, and affirmative action programs at work, and special programs in industries for you.. and then gloating like this. Now imagine doing it after calling this same situation "oppression" when men were succeeding more?
/r/MensRights22/06/25 11:12 PM
19

Bullshit. Men have been endlessly abused - demeaned, degraded, and dehumanized. Boys are smeared with original sin and men are seen predators and enemies by default. The state has disempowered men in all relationships to the point where interacting with a woman can be literally dangerous and marriage is a roll of the dice where he is likely to lose his children, social connections, money, and end up a statistic. If you care so much about men, then stand along side us and work to change a culture…
/r/MensRights22/06/25 06:22 PM
1

I'd have to disagree. First, while it's true men report higher levels of libido on average compared to women, it isn't an absolute binary. There's a lot of overlap between men and women - a lot of men with lower libidos than average women and a lot of women with higher libidos than the average man. I believe the feeling that men have higher libidos comes from the fact that men are primarily attracted to health and fertility markers, while women are attracted to that but also hypergamous and seek…
/r/MensRights22/06/25 06:16 AM
27

Not a shocker. Education is one of the main indicators of higher income: Grade school was redesigned for girls success. Shorter recesses and gym classes, more emphasis on group activities, less emphasis on test taking, and more emphasis on conscientiousness. Male teachers drummed out of the field so boys have no positive male role models, study after study showing bias against boys by female teachers ignored. Extra curricular activities and opportunities earmarked especially for girls through sp…
/r/MensRights22/06/25 02:40 AM
7

You're creating two false dichotomies in a row. Your first false dichotomy is that because men and women both have problems that they are equal. This is false. Just because two people have "problems" does not mean they must be equal. When men fall they hit rock bottom and no one cares, when women fall society holds out a safety net for them and raises them back up. Men are suffering far worse and doing far worse by basically any metric you can imagine. Don't tell men who are homeless and dying a…
/r/MensRights21/06/25 03:31 PM
36

Western countries have predominantly granted refugee status to women from Ukraine. 90% of Ukrainian refugees are women and children. Ukraine is under martial law which forbids men 18-60 from leaving the country. Unfortunately, it's just a fact of life that an important aspect of mating for women is ongoing and continuous support. This is why in civilian life if a man falters women reach for the divorce button instantly and instigate 70% of divorces. When Ukrainian men are whisked away to war by …
/r/MensRights21/06/25 02:57 PM
13

What rational reason is there for a man to give up his seat to a woman in 2025 on that basis alone? Women want to have their cake and eat it too. They want all the freedom and self determination of egalitarianism, but they also want to continually benefit from benevolent sexism without accountability or responsibility. In reality, the truth is they just want want want. More equal than equal. Edit: And it's really ironic that she brings up that men and war bit because women also shamed men in the…
/r/MensRights21/06/25 02:36 PM
6

In the final analysis, I think people will be shocked to realize how much of all this is just insecurity, jealousy, sexual selection, and other evolutionary psychology playing out. We have no problem circumscribing men's behavior, but because women's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are considered sacred and unquestionable it's giant blind spot in modern society.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 02:52 AM
3

Tiktok is absolutely rotten with misandry. There are entire memes about decentering men, degrading men for not giving up their seats for women on the bus or subway, taking shots of men with quotes like "men used to go to war". Lest we forget choosing the bear etc. I decided to run an experiment. I hopped on TikTok right now for a bit. Here are some choice comments: "Men just making messes and trying to normalize it" "Men are children/digusting/pedos/etc" (multiple) "I truly hate men. All problem…
/r/MensRights19/06/25 02:45 AM
5

Head I win, tails you lose. This is just hypergamy with a new suit. Women were given a free ride into income and now don't see the value in men which do not have higher status so relationships become "mankeeping". Never mind that men have been "woman-keeping" and still leading mutually beneficial fulfilling relationships just fine. Really goes to show how utilitarian and transactional relationships are to these women. The gaslighting is frustrating. Men provide the lions share of emotional suppo…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 03:04 AM
3

Happy father's day everyone!
/r/MensRights15/06/25 06:45 PM
5

Happy father's day everyone!
/r/MensRights15/06/25 06:45 PM
4

They don't know. They wrote whiteness first, then changed to western imperialism, could have also seen expected patriarchy, capitalism, late stage capitalism, colonialism. They have a little grab-bag of euphemisms that attack their ideological enemies while also serving as euphemisms for "society".
/r/MensRights14/06/25 09:45 PM
6

The problem is they have no real plan. They are strong and independent when it benefits them, and they are weak, needing a provider and protector when it suits them. Gender roles are wrong for them, but men are still expected to play them out but also not play them out. It's incredibly short term thinking. Just extract as much resources as possible before it all crashes and burns under the weight of their own contradictions.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 09:40 PM
1

Creating "balance dichotomies" like this often leads to false equivalence, where positions with vastly different levels of evidence or ethical standing are treated as equally valid. This kind of artificial balance dilutes the truth and avoids the necessary responsibility of making informed judgments. Instead of fostering genuine dialogue, it can paralyze discourse by preventing clear decisions or actions. Worse, it can serve as a manipulative tactic to appear neutral while actually sidestepping …
/r/MensRights14/06/25 09:31 PM
6

The intrusion of women into men's spaces for sure. Another modern problem is that men have been explicitly targeted and demonized for decades now - starting in the 1960s and developing over the decades. Second-wave feminism popularized narratives around sexual harassment, assault, and power imbalances, especially in workplaces and homes. In the 1980s and 1990s, selling these narratives to the women became big business. High-profile criminal cases, increasing media coverage of child abuse, and th…
/r/MensRights14/06/25 09:27 PM
6

Hypergamy is a hell of a drug. Men can't *truly* understand it because it isn't part of our evolutionary psychology but once you learn of it you see it confirmed again and again empirically.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 09:19 PM
5

You have to remember that they have been propagandized into a cult that lied to them. They believe men have a great amount of privilege and even after experiencing this feeling, they still blame the ideological boogeyman (boogeyman whiteness, western imperialism, patriarchy, etc)
/r/MensRights14/06/25 09:13 PM
18

It really is everywhere now and you can't avoid it. Mainstream culture for women is now based on passive male-bashing. Men are so disadvantaged at the institutional level (schools, criminal courts, human rights tribunals, divorce and family law, etc etc) that I often try not to pay too much attention to culture directly, but it's become overwhelming. It's like a fungus that spreads into the cracks of everything until even the most benign spaces become vehicles for misandry.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 04:02 PM
6

I agree with everything you said and it's 100% true. As with most rhetorical tricks, there is a grain of truth to their position. There is women out there driven by male validation - just as there are men driven by female validation. However, to people who are ideologically driven by feminism and radicalized into hatred of men, even the slightest consideration of men is seen as not only proof of this validation seeking behavior but also an attack on women as well. They are attacked as traitors, …
/r/MensRights14/06/25 03:50 PM
27

Not a shocker. Education is one of the main indicators of higher income: Grade school was redesigned for girls success. Shorter recesses and gym classes, more emphasis on group activities, less emphasis on test taking, and more emphasis on conscientiousness. Male teachers drummed out of the field so boys have no positive male role models, study after study showing bias against boys by female teachers ignored. Extra curricular activities and opportunities earmarked especially for girls through sp…
/r/MensRights14/06/25 03:34 PM
15

I'm honestly shocked. Shocked that: That the Guardian would publish a study they would normally work to attack or subvert. They are typically very misandrist and strong promoters of 'men online talking to each other is misogyny' narrative. That a study of this type wouldn't have been buried along with so many other studies that find issues that are inconvenient for feminists or societal orthodoxy, especially now when even the prime minister is attacking boys and men in the wake of their stupid l…
/r/MensRights14/06/25 03:04 PM
25

One of the more subtle aspects of propaganda is that it rarely disputes facts directly, but instead manipulates their perceived importance. Some facts are amplified into existential threats; others are dismissed as irrelevant, regardless of their actual weight. This creates the illusion that the mere existence of a fact validates the narrative being promoted. The "manosphere" and "femosphere" reflect this dynamic. Women have been far more extensively radicalized than men, and anti-male sentiment…
/r/MensRights14/06/25 02:51 PM
4

a. Double Standards. Holding women to traditional gender roles is wrong, sexist, oppressive while holding men to them is still totally accepted - and women routinely shame and degrade men for not wanting to fulfill them. I commonly see the sentiment "What are men even good for, then?" if a man won't act in the role of provider or protector. Men are treated with contempt online if they believe in splitting the bill for this reason. b. Strategic contradiction. Actions and rhetoric used by women to…
/r/MensRights14/06/25 02:31 PM
3

If you've never been on TikTok you wouldn't believe how wild it is. And this represents the younger generation of women coming up. They're all full of hate, radicalized, and lash out at men constantly. They're brains are completely tuned to view every situation with a man as him being a predator, wrong, evil. This is a result of a sustained and growing campaign online targeting women. Anger itself is rewarding, it releases dopamine, gives a rush, and can become addictive. Social media amplifies …
/r/MensRights14/06/25 02:57 AM
6

They didn't even bother to give women the cooked survey they are using to justify their position. Women could be 10000x more abusive but Australians wouldn't know. We are justifying policy here, not doing actual research.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 03:52 AM
7

You've repeated that twice but it's useless and you are being rightfully downvoted. If you're going to bother to take the effort to comment, why not actually point out what aspects of the comment are not supported by the article?
/r/MensRights11/06/25 03:51 AM
4

If what you say is true, why would that make it a weird complaint?
/r/MensRights11/06/25 03:46 AM
2

We are so used to the misandry in society that it's hard to see, but realize that - bit by bit - society has stripped all humanity from men. Decades ago men were assumed to experience all aspects of the human condition but today men are now portrayed as barely more than animals who just want to fight and fuck and acquire. From this perspective it doesn't seem like men should be in a relationship. But never forget that the great musicians, the poets, the artists, and the writers throughout histor…
/r/MensRights11/06/25 03:08 AM
16

The unfortunate byproduct of feminism and society thinking of gender in terms of identity groups and power dynamics. They dismiss the pain and suffering of any man just because he is a man. Let this be a lesson for you: So many men scurry for validation and not to be 'one of the good ones'. Yet, see how these women know nothing about this man but are willing to throw him into the garbage because of their narratives about gender. Berating and torturing yourself to fit into the inconsistent mold o…
/r/MensRights08/06/25 08:52 PM
16

I want you to imagine the most vile, hate filled, vicious, cruel, misogynist you can think of. Now multiply that by a thousand and you'll have the average young woman today. Any topic, any context, en masse, unrelenting, obsessively, and without reservation women reflexively shit on men and say things so vile, essentialist, and reductionist that the misogynist you imagined would be shocked by the level of hatred he has just witnessed. For young women, songs that denigrate men give them the warm …
/r/MensRights07/06/25 07:33 PM
6

The state will always serve the needs of women. Always has, always will. Evolutionary psychology and biological reality form the shape of every human society, ideology is just the clothing we dress it in.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 07:20 PM
15

I feel like it's the opposite. In childhood, being autistic is not easy regardless of gender. However, studies show autistic girls tend to have an easier time integrating due to social camouflaging, less overt repetitive behaviors, more socially acceptable interests, etc. It's far easier for an autistic girl to fade into the crowd and keep a low profile. Autistic boys stand out and are pretty much relentlessly attacked, bullied, and ostracized by the group. As people approach and enter adulthood…
/r/MensRights06/06/25 02:56 PM
40

Don't forget that grade school and high school have been redesigned for girls success to the detriment of boys. Don't forget male teachers have vanished and female teachers have a studied and well known bias against boys. It starts early.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 04:37 AM
22

Where do men even stand in society anymore today? Outside of it. They say there is freedom in the ghetto. The simple, humble, dream you were promised is a lie. You're in uncharted waters, but there is anticipation in that as well. Set your eye on the horizon, plot a course, and make use of whatever you find to the best of your ability. You have to make your own dreams now.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 11:31 PM
2

Just stop killing everyone and no one would have to worry. This doesn't follow from what I said. The phenomenon I'm referencing is that women have a fear that is not justified by statistics. Therefore, regardless of the state of the world women would exhibit this behavior. Therefore women would exhibit this behavior regardless of what men do or don't do. It's evolutionary psychology. However, not all evolutionary behavior is adaptive in a modern context. The solution is to educate women so they …
/r/MensRights02/06/25 02:37 PM
49

Studies show that women consistently report much higher levels of fear of crime and perceived risk of crime than men, despite men having higher actual victimization rates for most offenses in many regions. In a rational world we would teach women that their evolutionary psychology is giving rise to this fear that is not justified or supported by statistics or evidence. We would liberate women from their fears knowing they are unfounded. Unfortunately, we live in a world where every feeling women…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 05:34 AM
8

This entire conversation just went way over your head. Abortion isn't the important point here. The point is that instead of discussing and platforming issues explicitly important to men in an inclusive way, they are working to game men into supporting for their existing platform. ( In fact, abortion isn't a particularly gendered issue in terms of support. Geography is a far better predictor of how someone will feel about it than gender )
/r/MensRights31/05/25 06:42 PM
1

Men never really oppressed women. To justify that conclusion, not only do you have to judge history through a modern individualistic lens which doesn't really apply, you also have to bend every unknown into an oppression narrative, and ignore a lot of technological advancement. Women are born into poor and rich families across all geographies at the same rate as men. Do you really believe fathers, brothers, and sons just felt animosity towards their wives, sisters, and daughters and wanted to op…
/r/MensRights31/05/25 06:36 PM
2

Is it really true that bunch of Ukraine women run away to other countries and get new Partner or just enjoy their dancing life in night club parties? Yes. Western countries have predominantly granted refugee status to women from Ukraine. Did some googling. 90% of Ukrainian refugees are women and children. Ukraine is under martial law which forbids men 18-60 from leaving the country. There were 23.92 million women in Ukraine, and there has not been 6.3 million refugees. Women and children make up…
/r/MensRights31/05/25 07:18 AM
7

Your original comment is downvoted because it comes across as as a rhetorical question with an implication. Similar in tone and style to another rhetorical question feminists often bring out: "And who set the system up?" This comment is being downvoted because what you just said comes across as deranged and contains more obvious rhetorical tricks. As a bad faith actor you need to up your game.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 02:21 AM
47

In terms of socioeconomic status, you have a few men at the very top, then a sea of women who look up so hard they have neck strain, and then the rest of men at the bottom. The women are so fixated on the few men above them they cast themselves as oppressed victims. In corporate America, it's the same pattern. A few men at the very top, then a sea of middle manager women, and then the rank and file - and the narrative is about glass ceilings. (Obviously not as homogenous as stated and it's compl…
/r/MensRights31/05/25 02:11 AM
87

Julianna has suggested that the party should address issues such as abortion from a male perspective, emphasizing how men could benefit from such policies. So, basically subordinate men to women. Don't discuss men's social issues or platform any policies important to men, but just double down on prioritizing women and attempt to pretzel men into that agenda.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 01:54 AM
10

The republicans definitely have designs on men, but the democrats just hate them. I guess there is a certain freedom in being hated, but human nature dictates that most people want to be included and part of something even if it constrains them.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 01:51 AM
20

Considering spending. The dems are scurrying and coming up with a lot of plans to try to solve the 'man problem', but none of them actually involve considering men or issues important to men in their platform or even changing their opinion of men: Which is that they don't like them very much.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 01:46 AM
9

Bingo. Marketing is all well and good, but it's going to come across as absolutely hollow and won't won't resonate with anyone because the marketing team has nothing of substance to work with. The democrats have no vision for men other than to subordinate them to women.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 01:43 AM
23

The problem with the democrats is ideological. They've been scapegoating men for so long now it's in their DNA. Do you remember the ads democrats launched targeting men during the election? A condescending moralizing tone, reductive stereotypes about masculinity, demonizing traditional masculinity as toxic, with a focus on issues that were important to women and not men. Not one blip about the economy (jobs, inflation, energy prices) but all about social issues and gender equality. The overall m…
/r/MensRights31/05/25 01:38 AM
25

Just psychology. I men have standards then women have to live up to them if they want a man. If men have preferences then women have to cater to them if they want a man. They might not conform to those preferences or be able to live up to those standards. They may be able to but are having a whine about havign to put in any work to get what they want. The one thing they absolutely will not do is take accountability. So, it's the usual game: Blame men. Attack men. Belittle men. The crazy thing is…
/r/MensRights30/05/25 09:37 PM
10

A lot of bad faith actors drop into this subreddit and talk how men don't seem to care and how men don't seem to openly advocate. Let this be an example. Speaking up and advocating for men can cost you your job and your career. For many men that sets the stage for losing family, or access to their children. Unlike woken, who enjoy an immense of privilege, it's literally very risky for men to advocate openly. There has never been so much awareness of male issues and problems among men as there is…
/r/MensRights29/05/25 09:16 PM
3

Almost all men have been hit by their partner at some point. Punched, hit, slapped, shoved. Partner violence against men is downplayed as practically normal. Most men wouldn't dream of reporting unless the injury was serious and even then society downplays going to police, and police themselves try to deescalate into a non-report. But beyond that, the truth is that reporting it puts you in real danger. Any domestic violence situation on the books you were involved in will just become a black mar…
/r/MensRights28/05/25 04:49 PM
7

It's not just male loneliness. Any man who doesn't conform to what women see as an ideal for them is eventually shunned and treated as morally bad. They don't simply focus on the ideal and ignore these men; they slander them as dangerous, creepy, weird, suspect, and morally lacking. They actively work to push them to the fringe. These are the men they want living transient lives cleaning the sewers, delivering their goods, working dangerous jobs in dangerous conditions, and dying in war. As long…
/r/MensRights28/05/25 04:33 PM
16

I disagree, and here's why: Never forget that every interaction on social media has three participants: You, the person/people who you are engaging with (you respond to them, they respond to you), and a third: The silent majority that is reading but not engaging. Your primary audience should be them. By bringing up these issues you make them a part of the conversation. You make everyone reading aware of them. The alternative is that people may not be aware of the issues at all. Nothing of value …
/r/MensRights28/05/25 02:37 PM
37

It's not just reddit either. You'll find rampant anti-male hysteria on pretty much every social media platform today.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 02:28 PM
28

Spaces that are exclusively for women are for women. Spaces that are exclusively for men are for men. Any space that admits both men and women will cater to women. Even if it's male dominated and male centric. And spaces are men are practically verboten today.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 02:27 PM
5

At this point feminists are telling such ridiculous lies without even bothering to provide data that I'm sure even they are shocked they are getting away with it, despite never being held to any standard by society.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 04:19 AM
11

Women are hypergamous and seek security (power, money, status) through relationships with men, but they also feel physical attraction and attraction to other traits that feel dangerous or exciting. When young women are already secure they generally date in the short term biased far more towards looks and excitement. Broke chad is still a chad and worth a couple spins before moving on. When those secure women move into their thirties and start thinking of having children, then their bias shifts t…
/r/MensRights25/05/25 05:27 PM
18

You're not wrong at all, but it's important to understand that AI also goes through several additional training steps that are both supervised and unsupervised. A specific point of view and ideology are imparted on the output through this training, and an anti-male pro-feminist bias is definitely a big part of that.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 04:13 AM
22

ChatGPT is funny. You can ask it something about men without even mentioning women and it'll shove in a weasel paragraph about how women can do it too, or women have it worse, or women are better in some area.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 04:11 AM
1

All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 04:09 AM
10

The patriarchy is feminisms one size fits all answer for men's problems, followed by "when equality is achieved for women men's problems will be solved as well". However, just like all political ideologies based on some kind of "dialectic" or transformation... "equality" here is a utopian ideal which will never be reached. In other words: Men's problems will be resolved in heaven and we aren't going to do a damn thing to address them.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 04:08 AM
3

Oh, don't misunderstand me. When I said "many women support men's rights" I didn't mean a majority or even a large minority. I just meant they exist and some have been major supporters of the movement. As I stated, the vast majority of women are either an unquestioning part of the anti-male system they benefit from or they are knowing and willful misandrists and full of hate. Women's "associations" are almost certainly anti-male and whenever the feminist lobby intersects with government you're g…
/r/MensRights24/05/25 06:28 PM
2

Misogyny became a word that scared people, so they worked hard to shove everything they could into the category in order to better leverage it's power.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 02:07 AM
1

Rhetorically, you won't convince the ignorant by revealing their ignorance, the ignorant by highlighting their ignorance, or the irrational by highlighting their irrationality. It's amusing enough when it's one person, it's frightening when it's a mob, and existentially soul crushing when it a mob sanctioned by authority. When it comes to anti-male behavior and attitudes we're at the authority stage. Also, don't get me wrong, I'm not a red pill guy or anything like that. If you're thinking like …
/r/MensRights24/05/25 01:54 AM
3

I think it's also funny that anime and manga are super popular with girls and women as well for pretty much the same reason. There's actual genres and types of shows that appeal to them and characters which more realistically affecting him. Take a male character, acting as a man, playing out a male fantasy, following archetypically male narratives... and slapping on a pair of breasts and gender bending him isn't some wonderful social act. Muddying the truth with fiction instead of revealing it i…
/r/MensRights24/05/25 01:46 AM
3

Give me a break. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1ktgldb/reactions_to_corbie_jean_walpole_burning_a_man/
/r/MensRights24/05/25 01:38 AM
6

I think you'd be surprised how many women do support men's rights. It's a sad reality of human nature that usually people will just 'go along' with societies narratives without question unless they personally affect them. Unfortunately, the dominant social narrative today is profoundly anti-male. This is true of both men and women; it's just more likely for men to come face to face with the truth than women generally. Further, this is doubly true if the prevailing social narrative actually benef…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 08:50 PM
14

A great irony of feminism is that it actually oppresses women.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 05:55 PM
5

The APA finally bothered to issue guidance for working with men just five years ago and it's all about how toxic masculinity and how men harm women. The entire field is hostile to men.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 04:15 AM
2

Cognitive dissonance. They have a very ideological and unrealistic world view deeply interwoven with their identity and reinforced by peer groups. When faced with evidence that their world view is deeply flawed and incorrect they can do one of two things: First, they could begin the difficult process of reevaluating their core beliefs, restructuring their world view brick by painful brick, rediscovering themselves free of the ideology and reforming their very identity, while likely losing and ha…
/r/MensRights17/05/25 06:15 PM
2

You are framing these in terms of 'magnitude'. As in, "you should be a little x, but not too much x". That isn't the case. These are all actually contradictions. e.g. Share your feelings (or I can't get to know you to predict and control you), but also don't share your feelings (or I'll think you're weak and unstable and can't be depended on). Within a relationship, this is often a means of control. By using contradictions such as demanding openness while reacting with hostility to honesty or in…
/r/MensRights11/05/25 10:51 PM
52

"Boys will be Boys" has always meant rowdiness, horse play, coming in from dinner with dirty clothes, or scrapped knee etc. Outside of feminist delusions, no one says "boys will be boys" to excuse sexual assault or rape. You can lump into the penis envy side of feminism, seeing as it is in no way derogatory to girls, but feminist women just couldn't stand boys being given anything unique.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 04:43 AM
6

The fastest way to be put in a box in the corner and ignored is to totally defang yourself in the interests of "getting along". Feminists and those who are against the interests of men are not going to stop scapegoating, degrading, and stoning you just because you refuse to fight back, assert yourself, or express anger. People with your idea come along from time to time espousing that mens rights should take a higher road rationalist philosophy; but that philosophy has already proven not to work…
/r/MensRights07/05/25 04:59 PM
20

Yet another double bind / damned if we do, damned if we don't situation.. "A strange game. The only winning move is not to play." I would suggest letting them be damned and walking away.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 04:14 PM
4

Imagine having all that privilege and power and not even knowing what the fuck you want. Modern women are nothing but self damage while playing on easy mode.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 04:10 PM
8

Pretty damn rare. 40 should be treated as the wall because the chances of a successful pregnancy drop off steeply in your early 40s. At 43 you'd have a 1-5% chance of getting pregnant per cycle, and a 30-50% chance of miscarriage. After 40, IVF rates only increase the chance to ~5–10% per cycle. The risks of birth defects and genetic disorders increase significantly due to age-related changes in egg quality, so you are more likely to be confronted with difficult decisions regarding continuing a …
/r/MensRights05/05/25 12:44 AM
4

Welcome to the last 60 years. Related thread
/r/MensRights04/05/25 08:19 PM
2

The "manosphere" is a completely made up construct; a boogeyman. It's basically a label used to construct a collective identity for young men which can they be used to demonize or control them. Any media that appeals to men that does not serve the right ideology is thrown into the manosphere bucket and ridiculed and smeared with accusations of radicalizing. They need to engage with men. Full stop. But this all cuts to the heart of the problem with democrats; to them the things the common man lik…
/r/MensRights03/05/25 05:04 AM
209

The guardian is a worthless rag, but it only has the anti-male pandering strategy it does because there's an audience of women who eat it up. As for this this article; it's just an advertisement for a book. As for this woman; she's a professional victim who knowing and willingly sold her body at every turn and now that's she's aged out she's looking to cash in.
/r/MensRights03/05/25 01:32 AM
3

Remember, a very big portion of practiced feminism is their insecurity, and they deal with that by projecting. Hard.
/r/MensRights03/05/25 01:31 AM
2

If you think feminists in the 21st century are really horrible, wait'll you see the ones from the 20th I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class hatred against the class that is oppressing them. - Robin Morgan, 1974 Only when manhood is dead will we know what it is to be free. -Andrea Dworkin, 1981 The proportion of men must be reduced and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race. - Sally Miller Gearhart, 1982 If life is …
/r/MensRights02/05/25 04:09 AM
175

Just a reminder that there is still huge pushback for paternity testing by women generally. In France it's actually illegal to get a paternity test unless court ordered under the reasoning of "preserving family peace". Paternity fraud happens a lot more than people think.
/r/MensRights30/04/25 11:03 PM
4

That sounds like a crazy over reaction and a weird "gender war" take on the situation. Does she even like you or does she need a therapist?
/r/MensRights30/04/25 01:04 AM
2

Interesting how you just make all these weird crazy assumptions about others in order to confirm your biases and ignore reality. It's safe to assume each assumption is projection, and you're a femcel with little experience with men except through online propaganda. Those 1-in-n studies make for great propaganda, but they are cooked and biased studies. They were conducted using phone interviews with leading questions and massively broad definitions of sexual violence (non-physically pressured act…
/r/MensRights30/04/25 12:05 AM
2

Feminism is an ideology predicated on scapegoating men. It's based on identity politics and power dynamics. You want to turn women into a voting block or to push your agenda, so you make two tribes of men and women, and you claim that men are strong and women are weak, and that men are oppressing women, and that women need to fight back. This builds solidarity and purpose, and then you just direct them. The side effect of this is that men are the eternal scapegoat, the oppressor, the bully. With…
/r/MensRights29/04/25 03:23 AM
10

The No True Scotsman fallacy is an informal logical fallacy where one attempts to protect a universal generalization from counterexamples by arbitrarily redefining the criteria. A: No Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge. B: But my uncle Angus is Scottish and he puts sugar on his porridge. A: Well, no true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge. See: No real feminist is like that.
/r/MensRights29/04/25 03:19 AM
8

They just say 'incel' to hurt you. They already know how unfair and unreasonable it is; they just don't care. They just drop it because it requires almost no effort for them, but causes you emotional distress and elicits disproportionate, serious responses. The goal is not genuine discussion but to exhaust, humiliate, or frustrate you. In my opinion, by responding at too much length you run the risk of validating their insult. You're signaling that it still works a goad and that they should keep…
/r/MensRights28/04/25 04:54 PM
4

It's definitely primarily used by women, but there is no shortage of self hating men, or men who sellout other men to try to avoid getting smeared themselves and scapegoated. (they won't escape)
/r/MensRights28/04/25 04:36 PM
37

They will talk about toxic masculinity out of one side of their mouth, but all their insults reinforce those same gender roles and expectations.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 04:31 PM
5

In a broad sense, a relationship is a negotiation. Each person wants to get something out of it. So, we do a little dance and agree to do A, B, and C, to get D, E, and F and - in theory - it's mutually beneficial for everyone. The problem is that we live in a society that has conditioned women to believe everything they feel is valid, everything they want is deserved, all feelings justified. The result is that men are ruthlessly demonized for any demands they bring to the table while simultaneou…
/r/MensRights28/04/25 02:57 AM
3

Your approach only works if everyone engages in good faith, but those who oppose male advocacy act in bad faith. Strategically, you are advocating a defensive posture: "We must prove they are wrong about us." But they will ban you anyway. They will attack you anyway. It is male advocacy itself they cannot tolerate - not some stray comment. Instead, do not seek approval from those who hate you, and do not fight on prepared ground. They use cheap, low-effort attacks that demand exhausting, reasone…
/r/MensRights27/04/25 03:00 AM
3

This smells like paranoid shcizophrenia, friend. She needs to understand that she is sick and she needs to get help. If she continues down this path with absolute confidence in her delusions, you could find yourself in an absolute nightmare in a single moment like you wouldn't believe.
/r/MensRights26/04/25 10:28 PM
12

Of course. I'm speaking in terms of population-level averages and broad cultural trends. These patterns help explain shifts over time but don't have meaningful predictive power at the individual level due to variability and individual differences. So while the gender dynamics described are statistically observable, it's also true that there were also some women who shared these niche interests before they became mainstream, including women who were directly involved in them becoming mainstream. …
/r/MensRights25/04/25 12:58 AM
24

Traditionally, what is the justification for women retiring earlier? Is there even a logical reason? The internet says it's about life expectancy and career interruptions, but that makes no sense. They live longer than men and contribute less than men. If we were to treat women like we do men, they would have to work longer not less. Of course, that would never happen.. but I don't see how you can't make an argument they should retire earlier.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 12:32 AM
26

It would be one thing if we mediated their evolutionary programming by actually teaching girls about their biases, but instead we double and triple down on validating every thought and feeling they have. The result is that the natural in-group bias is pushed to the max setting at all times.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 12:24 AM
52

I've noticed already that women are becoming much more polygamous now as a coping strategy. Society hoisted them to upper middle class for free but they are still hypergamous, so they gotta share I guess.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 03:00 AM
14

If you think incels are angry now, wait'll they find out what women are like!
/r/MensRights23/04/25 02:51 AM
19

If you think about it, saying your oppressed and actually getting that codified into law and institutional policy and therefore forcing actual oppressed people to play along is the ultimate expression of privilege.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 05:58 PM
8

There's a comment on that youtube video that's 7 months old that says: "Watch, she's gonna get 100 hours of community service and 90 days of house arrest." Damn. The sad thing is, although she got 100 hours of community service, she got even less than that commenter predicted otherwise.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 05:56 PM
6

It's far worse than that that. Even discussing this at all puts you on the dark side of society. Men just discussing the male experience is treated as threatening. Met with eye rolls, and shouts of "incel", charges of misogyny. Just talking about it smears you with the shit stick. Hell, posting in this sub gets you literally banned from many other subs. Core Core as a means to seeking mental help Careful here. While I agree whole heartedly that someone should seek emergency care if they are in a…
/r/MensRights21/04/25 07:29 PM
1

Honestly, it seems like women need to sort themselves out. Men are just taking their cues from women here. For a decade now, the hard line is that approaching women is creepy and even threatening. Women let radicals speak for them without speaking up and this is the result. Of course, in reality men know that approaching women is "creepy and even threatening sometimes and often but not always!" Men are put in an impossible situation. Some women want to be approached and some don't. Most women wi…
/r/MensRights21/04/25 05:46 PM
3

Yeah that's fair. The main thing I wanted to convey was that AI's are every bit as prone to government and corporations implementing censorship and narrative control as any social media platform, search engine, or media organization. It would be a grave mistake to assume what you see when you ask ChatGPT a question is just the result of the it's training data. OpenAI can change "the message" with the flip of a switch if they want.
/r/MensRights20/04/25 04:05 PM
21

Agree with everything you wrote. So much is being written about this, but it's really very simple: You don't go where you aren't wanted. The left berates men, degrades them, disadvantages them, marginalizes them, and deprioritizes them, villainizes them, and continually uses them as a scapegoat. Like most abusers, the left has the mistaken belief that this abuse will cow men into submission and thus give them power over men. In reality, more often than not, the person being abused just leaves. S…
/r/MensRights20/04/25 04:52 AM
6

ChatGPT definitely has a bias in favor of feminism, a bias in favor of women, and a bias against men. However, I would take posts like this with a grain of salt. It's extremely easy to manufacture this kind of response using prior prompts or custom instructions which are not a part of the screen shot. I've never seen ChatGPT answer with this kind of tone naturally, and I don't get answers like this when asking the same questions.
/r/MensRights20/04/25 04:42 AM
24

Training data is only part of the story. Notice it doesn't swear, it's politically correct, it avoids taboo subjects, and a myriad of other things that go beyond raw training data. ChatGPT undergoes several additional layers of additional supervised and unsupervised training. Tons of workers somewhere in Africa follow a playbook provided by OpenAI and laboriously label outputs as good or bad which also provides additional training. Beyond that, there are also several supervisory AIs that can mod…
/r/MensRights20/04/25 04:30 AM
23

In the 1940s/1950s era you are talking about, the work done by women (and men) was mostly calculation using computers like ENIAC, EDSAC, UNIVAC, etc. for For example, they would use a punch card to choose "5" and "5" and then feed it into the sum program to get 10 - but they didn't write the sum program. They were assigned this job under government programs, and the work was a natural extension of the work they were already already doing for the US government; which was crunching numbers. In a m…
/r/MensRights20/04/25 02:50 AM
104

100% correct. This is the cycle. Women are drawn with power. They seek to control and wield it, but they don't create it. Today this is most obvious with 'nerd culture'. Where for decades nerdy men were ridiculed and berated, the lowest rung on the social ladder; a caricature to be taken for their lunch money. In its early decades, computer science and tech startups were male-dominated and socially undervalued. Yet, as Silicon Valley became an economic juggernaut following the dot-com boom, vent…
/r/MensRights19/04/25 06:20 PM
23

From the article: “Notice how he didn’t even mention the child’s feelings?” “He should still be a father anyway. It’s not the child’s fault.” “What about the poor child?” “A real man wouldn’t abandon a child he has raised and who considers hi m dad.” “How can a man lose all love for a child he raised just because it's not biologically his? He’s still dad to the child.” “How heartless of him to even think about abandoning the child.” Notice how these are just transformations of the rationalizatio…
/r/MensRights19/04/25 05:25 AM
8

Of note: There are far fewer articles for men than women. In March, there are 24 articles under the women's section and just 5 for men. 31 articles for women in February and 3 for men. 27 for women in January and a single article for men. The men's articles are all almost all either advertisements (fashion, curatives), misandry, or literally actually women's articles. This is a section that has been totally abandoned, with a small but eclectic mix of various articles from other sections seeping …
/r/MensRights19/04/25 05:09 AM
12

Notice how vague she's being. It isn't a mistake. The phrase "boys are treated like defective girls" critiques educational systems that prioritize behaviors and learning styles typically associated with girls. When girl behavior is the gold standard in schools, boys are perceived as deficient when they don't conform to these standards. This perspective suggests that schools often emphasize qualities such as compliance, verbal expression, and sedentary learning; traits more commonly seen in girls…
/r/MensRights19/04/25 04:17 AM
23

I’m not a murderer. None of my friends are. It seems like an absurd thing to say, but this actually cuts to the heart of the matter. A very small fraction of men are actually rapists, predators, or murders. A very small fraction of men commit harassment, or stalking, or assault of any kind. Unfortunately none of this is based on fact. We live in a world where the scapegoating and smearing of men has reached a fevered and hysterical pitch. Adolescence is the new despicable front in war on the mas…
/r/MensRights19/04/25 03:55 AM
0

Didn't even read or care to read the article. Come on dude. This is beyond low effort. The image is awful, but it could be used to support a number of different arguments and positions.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 08:29 PM
2

Then why was this one deleted "Degrading acts committed against male conscripts" ?
/r/MensRights13/04/25 08:16 PM
1

It stands for: Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematic. It was invented around 2010 to bundle together technical, engineering, high paying, market disrupting jobs into a convenient acronym. It's been used as a bludgeon against men claiming sexism because men make up the majority of those fields and they pay well. Of course, pharma and medicine and other fields that pay extremely well and have many women but that is inconvenient for the gender grievance narrative.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 12:47 AM
5

This is just an anecdote, but almost all women care givers I see - doctors, counselors, specialists - have now gone part time without a single exception. I wonder what that means for health care when universities and hospitals have limited space to teach and train prospective doctors, yet are heavily incentivized to take on female students who end up working far less on average than their male counterparts.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 12:39 AM
10

they reduced the pay of garbage collectors (mostly male) This is an important side effect of female supremacist feminist special interest groups lobbying government. Men generally pay more to government in taxes overall, largely due to higher average incomes and labor force participation, yet women are far more likely to use social services. Many services are designed specifically to exclude men and focus on women (e.g., domestic violence shelters, homeless shelters, health programs including wo…
/r/MensRights13/04/25 12:32 AM
13

I'll take "Find something that relatively rarely happens, portray it as a gender thing where boys are evil, then sell it as a massive problem" for $100. This is one of the modern tricks the media plays. They have an agenda, they write an article or newscast in service for the agenda, and then they go find a couple of tweets or whatever to support it. This is the internet and there's eight billion humans, you'll never fail to find at least a couple tweets or people who will serve as examples for …
/r/MensRights13/04/25 12:16 AM
6

In our society we have developed a myth where women are the better angels of our nature, and men are base and driven by primal instincts. We are exposed it to through television, movies, books, and other media constantly and have for decades. This is even true regardless of political affiliation although for some different reasons. Of course, it's not true. Women can be every bit as nasty and vindictive as anyone. If it's reasonable to conclude that man is homophobic because he's threatened by y…
/r/MensRights13/04/25 12:00 AM
2

Nothing new. Look up the white feather movement. Many women have always stood beside the rich and powerful and looked down on those men who are sent off to die in wars. Just as they advocate for the men to be sacrificed in countless other ways for their benefit.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 11:49 PM
84

"His money is my money, my money is my money". It's a fact whether or not she makes more money or is the primary breadwinner. Ideologically she chose to split the finances evenly but it obviously isn't in her nature. It's distasteful that she's conflating this with children and with her idea that he is underpaid. She's clearly just muddying the waters to not come across as the bad guy. If he got another job and she got a raise they'd be in the same place and her feelings wouldn't change but ther…
/r/MensRights12/04/25 11:45 PM
36

He's a man on AITA on Reddit, in a story where he stands opposite a woman. Only a miracle could make that audience not project the worst possible interpretation of the story on him - and they did. I feel like he probably just has a noticeable bulge in the shorts and hasn't exposed himself, but it wouldn't really matter to AITA.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 11:35 PM
1

Advocacy movements for women have traditionally scapegoated men by casting them as oppressors. That is how feminism has built solidarity with women - by using identity politics to bundle women up into a tribe and then using power dynamics to declare that the enemy tribe - men - is out to get them. The result of this strategy is a pervasive misandry tied to these movements, and because these movements have become the primary secular dogma of the west there is now a pervasive misandry in our socie…
/r/MensRights11/04/25 05:22 AM
11

Indeed that's why it was made. Signal boosting it so that it goes viral was all part of the plan.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 05:06 AM
8

Except the KKK is an insignificantly small group that is also rightfully marginalized by society, where as this kind of extreme hatred of men is mainstream and celebrated widely. There is always going to be sexists, that isn't the issue. The issue that sexism against men is mainstream. It's policy. It shapes our public institutions from schools, to courts, to tribunals and family courts, to welfare, to the draft. Now that sexism is being honed bit by bit to an hysterical peak. That's the issue.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 05:01 AM
4

What would you teach "us" girls? That we should not have irrational fears? Yes, precisely. If there is behavior or psychology that is more prominent in girls due to evolutionary psychology or hormonal effects then I would have girls taught all about it. What a huge advantage in life to understand yourself better. To understand, when faced with these kinds of thoughts and feelings, that you aren't alone and that it's normal. The problem is that women's fear is useful to people with agendas. They …
/r/MensRights07/04/25 11:30 PM
10

What an absurd situation. Not only is she not held accountable for physically resisting, not held accountable for saying no, now even her own actions she initiates are free of accountability because they are 'obligations' and therefore also not her fault. Anyway - you set up the rules here dude. You asked "Can I kiss you?" and then you went for more. Be consistent.
/r/MensRights06/04/25 05:24 PM
41

The idea that only radical feminists hate men is laughable. You have to be so, completely, utterly, willfully ignorant to think otherwise. It's literally everywhere. It's extreme online, but casual degradation of men is mainstream culture, it's on primetime TV shows, it's in movies. While misogyny is censored, banned, and pushed to a few dark corners of the internet online, overt male hatred is on the front page, allowed, and encouraged. Men have been under the verbal lash far worse than anythin…
/r/MensRights06/04/25 04:32 PM
106

Additionally, look up Women's fear of crime studies consistently find that women around the world tend to have much higher levels of fear of crime than men, despite the fact that in many places, and for most offenses, men's actual victimization rates are higher. Unfortunately, as is the style of the times, no one teaches girls these things, and no one ever tells girls that their feelings might be irrational. Instead, our endless validation has turns unwarranted feelings into justifications and r…
/r/MensRights05/04/25 06:00 AM
4

You know why.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 12:33 AM
32

Eh. Almost no men would sanction other men who commit rape; they are punished. Quite brutally and often extrajudicially. Yet, almost all women sanction feminism, even if just a passive acceptance of the unfair privileges they get. Very few stand against it. Feminism is the defacto religion of the secular west, championed and supported by governments and corporations. It's mainstream culture. They seem just peachy keen to leave it alone as long as they can soak up any freebies that come their way…
/r/MensRights04/04/25 12:25 AM
1

No war like a holy war. To those people men are the enemy, but women who don't agree with them are traitors.
/r/MensRights02/04/25 07:37 PM
2

I've said it before and I'll say it again: An entire generation of women have been turned to hate online to a degree that the most dedicated misogynist could not hope to equal. Every day online the general discourse from all women would be absolutely alarming if you switched the genders. I don't need to go into some den of misandry, it's mainstream. Every single day boys and men are subjected to sentiments like how they need to be killed, locked up, curfewed, beaten, oppressed. How they are inhe…
/r/MensRights02/04/25 07:36 PM
9

Just remember, marriage is not only a contract, it's a contract that the state can interpret, rewrite, and void. No amount of clauses or prenuptial agreements will fully protect you, judges void them all the time to make sure women get their pound of flesh. Laws vary from region to region, make sure you understand what you're getting into.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 10:33 PM
30

In the past all these latent fears and smears did not exist. This has been done systematically and with great purpose. So many bad faith actors in this sub will try to claim that it's overblown, yet you can't even exist without catching a creep claim that can potentially ruin your life.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 10:19 PM
28

It's embarrassing you believe the advertising slogans. Study the actual literature, listen to prominent feminists, and look at the actions of feminist special interest groups. It has nothing to do with equality. If you believe in what you said, then you should abandon the feminist mantle and call yourself an egalitarian instead. Feminist movements are female supremacist in nature.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 10:17 PM
3

Unfortunately, government budget and funding allocation for special interests is a zero sum game within a budget cycle. In order to maximize funding for themselves, special interest groups need to spur people to political action, and this has lead to the creation of a set of divisive and militant political ideologies that impose "zero sum thinking" on peoples empathy so that special interest groups can capture and secure their support. Feminism is one such militant political ideology employed by…
/r/MensRights29/03/25 02:57 PM
4

I think you need to separate "misandry" and "wokeness". While wokeness is inherently misandrist, misandry can also come from different places as well. First, let's discuss Wokeness. I think you're confusing "awareness" for "dying and in decline". The public is finally - after more than a decade - becoming aware of "wokeness". That awareness carves out a place in the culture for counter narratives and even South Park like satire, but it's no serious threat to "wokeness". The people in power who a…
/r/MensRights29/03/25 02:34 PM
6

Lots of women, especially young women these days, end up being adopting feminist/misandrist views as they grow up. Sure, but dedicated parenting can counter such propaganda, and if done a girl will have a lot more opportunity than a boy. No amount of parenting can save boys entirely from a system that despises and disadvantages them.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 10:52 PM
11

I assume you're just a troll or a bad faith actor when you try to conflate women and feminism - so that by attacking one a man can be accused of attacking the other. Not so. Feminism claims dominion over women, but at the end of the day it's a political ideology and meme that exploits women and our evolutionary psychology in regards to them to gain power. Feminism is the dominant religion of the secular west, explicitly anti-male, and absolutely divisive. Scapegoating men is in the very DNA of t…
/r/MensRights28/03/25 10:46 PM
46

Guys it's a semantic weapon. They say they 'choose the bear' because they hate men and they know it hurts you. The amount of energy it takes to say 'I choose the bear" is a drop in the bucket compared to the amount of energy men are taking to process it, come up with arguments, and write reasoned responses. To say nothing of the psychological pain of being degraded. Then they will just respond with something equally flippant, and you'll spiral again. Further, it's a one-to-many attack so they hu…
/r/MensRights28/03/25 10:36 PM
3

Male suicide and workplace deaths are at epidemic levels and men die much earlier than women and to even try to address it as an issue is considered offensive and hateful towards women. Of course it isn't a priority.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 04:16 AM
12

Just like in book publishing, once women got in they radically restructured it: by women and for women. It's not a medium for men any longer. It's important to understand that feminists were always projecting. All the crazy unhinged stuff that never existed which they accused men of is what they would do if they had power. Now they do. Massive in-group bias for women, bias against men, disdain for things that appeal to men, and no hesitation whatsoever to privileging women over men to the point …
/r/MensRights28/03/25 03:50 AM
8

It's utterly fascinating seeing her lay out the situation out while taking absolutely zero accountability.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 02:36 AM
8

Feminist narrative which has been mainstreamed thanks to the internet and women gaining more power. They attack it because they hate men, they hate family, and they hate conservatives (who are more likely to want this).
/r/MensRights28/03/25 01:19 AM
18

It is a standard scientific There's nothing scientific about coming up with wild bias confirming but dubious social theories and shoving them down peoples throats because you pretend that biology doesn't exist. the GOAT explains here At the end he also throws in the party line about "being more welcoming" when I'll bet dollars to doughnuts that most chess clubs roll out red carpets for girls these days.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 01:16 AM
109

Every day I read the most deranged circular reasoning why young men are struggling, when the answer is so obvious: Western society is literally hostile towards them. It isn't rocket science. It isn't complicated. If you demonize someone, blame them for things unfairly, continually put their needs second to others, then they are going to check out. They are either going to throw up their hands and go zombie mode or they are going to find ways to seize happiness by working outside or side ways to …
/r/MensRights28/03/25 01:02 AM
65

Come on now. She probably had a traumatic childhood. Her dad was probably abusive. Her boyfriend is probably controlling. There must be some male in her life somewhere that caused her to act out like this. Society is to blame! She needs our compassion during this trying time. /s
/r/MensRights28/03/25 12:49 AM
6

It’s true that the opening line is little bit hyperbolic to make the comment provocative, but the substance of the argument holds: Anti-male rhetoric online is hardly just the domain of femcels. Those social media tags and memes were topping charts in their time and still do. Despite what you say, those attitudes online definitely color the attitudes towards men in the real world. Unequal outcomes in schools, higher education, courts, tribunals, divorce, and issues like intactivism, suicide rate…
/r/MensRights25/03/25 09:34 PM
8

Almost all women hate men. It's not like "choosing the bear" was some dark femcel meme found in the dark recesses of the internet. #killallmen #menaretrash #banmen #maletears #abolishmen #menarepigs. Or is all this just mansplaining? Perhaps an artifact of my toxic masculinity? Hate isn't what makes femcels unique, but rather that they don't feel they have the power to comfortably live with it so they grew bitter. The 'rabbit hole' of hate towards men is just mainstream culture.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 03:19 PM
4

You are speaking in contradictions. You say no one owes you friendship, yet you blame women for judging you. You make the conscious decision to act a certain way, and then claim it was the inevitable outcome of circumstance and out of your control. The judgements others make is not within your power, but you have a power over the things in your life for which you will be judged. Stop being a victim of circumstance and take the reigns. If you want to know the person who hurt you then look in the …
/r/MensRights23/03/25 10:18 PM
5

Since the age of 17 I haven’t had any friends. Meaning I didn’t spend time with another human outside of school or work. Shit I didn’t even have an online friend or texting buddy. Why not? For example, do you have a mental disorder, disability, ugly, poor, depressed? I noticed there is no part of your post where you attempted to identify why you are socially isolated. No part in the post where you have have outlined how you've taken accountability for your situation by trying to identify and fix…
/r/MensRights23/03/25 06:34 PM
18

Why the fuck are school curriculums changing because of some random fictional Netflix show? What kind of idiocracy bullshit is this? They've created an hysterical narrative about boys and men, and they are using a random fictional show to confirm their biases and go all in like they discovered some kind of evidence. Insanity.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 05:51 PM
1

Women whined about the role they had in society. Society always serves women, so in response society has fundamentally changed the dynamic but men refuse to wise up. Society has retooled schools for girls success at the expense of boys, has scholarships and affirmative action in admissions programs for women in universities and colleges, has DEI and other affirmative action programs in top corporations and gives them salaries higher than men. (until they crash out in their 30s.) Yet, at the same…
/r/MensRights22/03/25 03:47 PM
27

It genuinely seems that way because it is. It's obvious. You'd have to be incredibly stupid or willfully ignorant to deny it. We all know who they cast as the bad guys, as the fuck ups, as the fools in modern media. Women are rarely even allowed to be bad guys or evil anymore. There's a huge amount of media dedicated to humanizing female villains from old brands and making them into anti-heroes and explaining away their evil in context of how they have trauma.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 11:03 PM
21

Then just take a part of a male youth prison and convert it. But what you said doesn't matter anyway - The article was quite clear this is about giving the girls special privileges and special opportunities and a better life style with a brighter future, and has nothing to do with how many there are. If we extrapolate from the math in the article, then there are about ~500 boys in custody and google says 26 detention centers.. so 11 isn't that far off from the general occupancy of such a center …
/r/MensRights21/03/25 10:51 PM
5

Wow, that means 60% of female college students are liars.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 10:50 PM
2

All women have a bias in favor of women. Most women have a bias against men. This judge went out of her way to punish the man.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 10:49 PM
18

You say you aren't bothered and it doesn't matter, but I want you to consider some things: You thought it was strange at the time. You asked your friend how he felt about it, who said he was shocked and felt shame. A year later, it's still present enough in your mind that you felt compelled to make a post about it on reddit. You say you guys weren't bothered and it, it was no big deal, and that it was no issue for you, but it sounds like it that might not be true given that you are posting about…
/r/MensRights19/03/25 09:59 PM
11

One of the only things the "left" and "right" have in common: Worshipping women and advocating for female supremacy. As far as men goes: The left wants men exterminated, and the right wants to turn them into tools to be sacrificed (extermination too, but only after they've been used up).
/r/MensRights08/03/25 07:18 PM
12

Indeed. Men have been under the verbal lash for years. In every moment, at every place, online and offline. "Men are oppressors. Men are toxic. Men are all rapists. Men all have privilege over women. Men with their evil gaze. Men with their gatekeeping of power. Men controlling women's bodies. All other forms of the original sin men are smeared with. #killallmen #menaretrash #banmen #maletears #abolishmen #menarepigs." Did they choose the bear? Or is all this just mansplaining to them? The hatre…
/r/MensRights08/03/25 07:17 PM
9

If two people disagree online and one is a woman then: misogyny! Cook the books, get those numbers up.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 07:06 PM
2

You have to understand. When they make lying noises about supporting men they are referring to non white men. Men they want to rule over and dominate like they used to. Men they want back under their thumb. The solidarity of their ideology is based on hate. It relies on oppression narratives. They can't help everything, they need at least one scapegoat.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 03:47 AM
24

There's no better way to spell "more equal than equal" than "femicide". In a better world homicide would just be homicide. It wouldn't depend on identity characteristics. All citizens should be equal under the law. If the country has a fetish for hate crime legislation, then the prosecution should have to prove that protected identity characteristics of the victim were contextually important to the nature and execution of the crime. Characteristics like race, ethnicity, color, religion, age, sex…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 04:38 AM
0

Not wanting to sleep with her when she offers? Gay.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 04:34 AM
7

While that's true, I also feel like progressive ideology puts gay men 'in a box', and if you refuse to get inside they'll turn against you. You better be the gay man they want. Usually the one they saw on the television.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 04:31 AM
6

Wow, really! Which rights of women are men turning against? Men are trying to take away the vote?? Freedom of expression?? Right to a fair trial? To privacy?? Let's read the article and find out! Oh. What they really mean is that men are turning against feminist dogma. Female supremacy. The every increasing time, energy, money, and social support allocated for women who are already flourishing while men commit suicide in record numbers. Of course, they sprinkle in a few 'facts' to support their …
/r/MensRights04/03/25 04:26 AM
1

Archived version: https://archive.is/VZA1H
/r/MensRights04/03/25 04:18 AM
1

Archived: https://archive.is/VZA1H
/r/MensRights04/03/25 04:18 AM
3

Young women have been out earning young men in many cities and affluent areas for a very long time now. They've reinforced the pay gap myth not just by comparing all men against all women in aggregate, but also by ignoring age. University and college education is a great predictor for income. When 60% of those students are women, when there's support programs and additional funding there for women, when there are more scholarships for women, and when admission is easier for women, and when jobs …
/r/MensRights04/03/25 04:15 AM
16

It's even more messed up when you think about it. The gaslighting make believe word salad argument they pretend to believe in is "You can't be racist/sexist against white/men because racism/sexism is prejudice plus power". It's gross to view the word in such racial terms as they do, but at least it's true that you can arguably say whites have more power in society than some other racial groups. However, you'd have to be totally delusional to say men have any power in society today. Boys and men …
/r/MensRights04/03/25 04:07 AM
33

When all is said and done, feminist dogma basically says "men's problems will be magically solved when women have achieved equality." and they cast male issues in context of blaming men for not being for the cause. Well, it's pretty hard to look at the world today and say women and not more equal than equal. We've clearly overshot. Better outcomes in schools, universities, financials, courts. A new inequality based on untold amounts of social programs, affirmative action, scholarships, special f…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 01:05 AM
28

We need a good word or turn of phrase where people pretend to pay lip service to men for personal gain, but are forced to preface and hedge every statement with how women have it worse because otherwise the dogma of their own side will get them attacked. Ironic, they claim men have privilege but they can't even so much as pay lip service to supporting men without it hurting their carreers.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 12:55 AM
3

Nice dude! Humans rights commissions are basically leftist courts designed to advantage women over men.. so good luck.. but still it's good to get stuff like this out there either way and part of the conversation and public record.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 03:41 AM
15

He's not. He's doing it very methodically and purposefully. Despite their best efforts to destroy and diminish male advocacy via attacks and ridicule, it isn't going away. So in order to subjugate it they need to switch strategies and co-opt it. That is Richard Reeves job. He'll develop the framework by which left wing discourse can address the "mens rights" problem. One that subjugates male advocacy by embedding it strictly within a feminist framework, where male suffering can be understood thr…
/r/MensRights24/02/25 01:37 AM
31

There's a sub here called mens lib. It purports to care about men, but in reality it's just a feminist sub who are seeking to seize male advocacy so they can downplay men's problems and subordinate male advocacy within a feminist framework and beneath women's issues. Everything posted is couched in an apology and acknowledgement of men's oppression as well as attacking any archetype of maleness that doesn't conform to feminist and left wing dogma. Same shit here. They tried to destroy men's righ…
/r/MensRights24/02/25 01:25 AM
2

Women have always become embittered towards men for whatever they personally lack in the sexual market. That's most of the real feeling behind the rationalization that is called "feminism". Women want men for looks, but also power, wealth, and security. So when men get rejected they are expected to take accountability, better themselves, get more fit, earn more money, become a better bet. However, men are mostly interested in beauty and fertility. When a woman is rejected she can work to become …
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:29 PM
1

When anyone speaks of men's issues, feminists and women immediately get filled with total rage and try to attack, cancel, ruin the life of, destroy the person. Prefixing their statement with "Women have troubles too", "Women have it worse but", "Women have long faced problems of their own.." etc is a way to try to dampen this response. Given that the author bows down and scrapes their face against the floor and signals subjugation to feminist orthodoxy, women and feminists will usually just atta…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:18 PM
5

Ah the greatest social media boogeyman of all - capitalism! Every day on social media I see capitalism blamed for random crimes, someone being rude in traffic, people stubbing their toes. The only commonality in all these cases is that the people who blame capitalism seem to have no clue what it is. You're doing the same thing. You're saying "capitalism" but talking about... wealth accumulation, power accumulation, desire, hedonism, subjugation, homelessness, markets, materialism. Sorry to burst…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:08 PM
0

You're being downvoted but you're absolutely correct. Women inherit a gender schism that men do not. It evolutionary psychology and results in women having a massive in-group bias. Unfortunately, people love to set up a comfortable false dichotomy and use it to wash away everything scientific or factual. "Just two sides of the same coin!" is such a comfortable lie.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 07:48 PM
26

You may not like it, but here is the truth: When men and women occupy a space it becomes a women's space. Their feelings and considerations are put first, as men work to resolve their grievances and accommodate them. A microcosm of society. Therefore, a space that isn't male only can not serve men. It can't be treated as a place to indulge in healthy competition and measure, a place to unload emotions or talk about male issues. Not only will men be too busy serving women in a mixed space, but wo…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 07:40 PM
13

Civilized = bent into an unnatural pretzel, turned into a pack animal, a beast of burden, a utility. To be used up and then discarded.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 12:27 AM
6

Look at gender based outcomes from grade school, high school, universities, courts, family courts, human rights tribunals, in the workplace. Now look at the outcomes over time, look at the changes that happened in those institutions. Literally every public institution in the west is anti-male by design.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 05:14 AM
2

I never gain much traction when I say this. But, an entire generation of girls and women have been radicalized online. All the misogynists in the world can't hope to equal the amount of radicalization into hate that the average woman now posesses. It wasn't a story when it happened, and it isn't a story now. Women aren't held accountable generally, doubly so when the target is men.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 04:27 AM
13

The government literally forced them to shut down. It says right in the article the government pulled their funding. Or do you mean to say the government reversed its decision?
/r/MensRights17/02/25 03:50 AM
6

On Reddit it's by design. A little while back they released a new set of rules that very explicitly allowed hatred towards men in particular. Reddit is essentially a hate mongering site by design. The nature of subreddits is that people can get some utility out of reddit outside of the overall culture of the site but most subreddits that don't align with the agenda get banned sooner or later. In terms of the actual post you linked to; His feelings are based on trauma. He needs therapy. There's n…
/r/MensRights17/02/25 03:43 AM
10

Feminists have spent decades installing this idea that gender issues is a zero sum game: If you focus on men, you must be detracting from women. They've also spent decades installing the idea that "feminism" = "women's issues". Therefore, by their reasoning, to place focus on men is to be against feminism, and to be against feminism is to be anti-woman. They want to set things up so that the any discussed of gender issue is immediately and without qualification a woman's issue. Indeed, they have…
/r/MensRights16/02/25 09:05 PM
3

Hmm, I don't know it doesn't really seem to track. If hypergamy were the rule, why would women compliment other women if it increased the amount of competition they would face for high value males? You'll notice women are far more likely to compliment women who are less attractive because they aren't a threat. I think the better explanation is just evolutionary psychology. In hunter-gatherer societies women had to engage in cooperative childcare, food gathering, resource sharing, indirect influe…
/r/MensRights16/02/25 02:54 AM
1

An entire generation of girls have been turned to hate through social media and the internet. All of the red pilled misogynists in the world can't even hope to match 1% of 1% of the count or amount of hatred average girls now have. It's exceedingly rare to see women mention men in any way online that isn't dripping with a shocking amount of hatred and disdain. So yes, if they compete in something and win they are going to focus on gender and focus on degrading the male. Unfortunately, you can ma…
/r/MensRights16/02/25 02:35 AM
26

being tried to instill using media in the minds of men Absolutely. Girls and women have been portrayed in a very positive light in all media and television for over half a century now. They are the peace makers who abhor violence, they lament when the brutish men puff chests and make snide remarks about testosterone. They are portrayed not as people but instead the better angles of all of our nature. One of the most painful things about growing up as a boy is realizing you've been lied to all yo…
/r/MensRights16/02/25 02:13 AM
3

Anti white and anti male are part of the primary ideology of the democratic party. Left leaning white men have coped with this for decades by convincing themselves they are "one of the good ones"; That in a world of riff raff whites they are enlightened. The problem is anti-white and anti-male sentiment has grown to such an insane degree that the progressive/leftist fresh, young, and future of the democratic party no longer believes in such 'redemption' for white men. No amount of performative s…
/r/MensRights11/02/25 05:44 AM
3

Holy fuck it's a dude? I feel like I need a shower after learning that it's so repulsive.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 05:33 AM
22

The physical manifestation of the dominant ideology in modern psychology: That men are just defective women.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 01:59 PM
11

You are very correct in pointing out the central filter for these kinds of discussions is "why now?". A lot of feminists/misandrists will try hard to find biological and gender psychology explanations because that means no culture is at fault. I don't shy away from such explanations on principal, but it's clear this is a relatively new thing and that should weed out such quick answers that let people wash their hands responsibility. I agree public schools have been retooled for girls success at …
/r/MensRights03/02/25 05:39 PM
5

It doesn't really bother me, but it's a huge example of hypocrisy and double standards. The whole "666" bullshit brazenly on dating profiles and spoken about openly but if men have standards like weight, age, or body count they lose their minds. Nevermind that things like penis size and height are immutable while weight and body count are choices. As with may things, if a man does it it's disgusting and egregious behavior and misogynistic but no such pushback or stigma when women do it.
/r/MensRights26/01/25 12:00 AM
10

Traditional relationships are fine if the society they function within actually supports the idea. Unfortunately, that is no longer the case. Apps make the dating pool so wide that dating is mostly just getting used for free meals and drinks and getting nothing in return except the occasional hookup. Marriage is a meat grinder that in all likelihood she will abandon and will take you for half your shit or more while you lose contact with your kids. It's acceptable that women don't need to hold u…
/r/MensRights25/01/25 11:50 PM
19

More to the point, if she finds the guy unattractive. So, basically instructions are 1) attempt mind reading 2) results may vary.
/r/MensRights25/01/25 11:37 PM
152

Warnings signs you are suffering from gender war brain rot and need to touch grass: You perceive something that may be critical of women and you get combative and emotional and miss the point of the post entirely. You try to defend the perceived attack by downplaying numbers saying 60:40 is 'slightly more' and 'barely a majority' when it's actually quite a bit more than 50:50. Of course, the numbers are not the point anyway. You then lash out in your other comment, engaging in whataboutism about…
/r/MensRights21/01/25 05:58 PM
4

They just sound remarkably unhinged and in very desperate need of touching grass. They are working yourself up over a straw man, and the whole concept only drives them nuts because they see it as somehow sympathetic to men, whom they hate. First off, it's not a real thing. There's a GENERAL Loneliness Epidemic This is irrelevant. Author has gender war brain rot, but it's not a competition. The male loneliness epidemic is referencing a unique set of circumstances related to men and loneliness. It…
/r/MensRights21/01/25 04:42 AM
4

Look at the comments. Not a single solitary comment that isn't dripping with hatred and insecurity; tearing men down, attacking men, dehumanizing men, demonizing men.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 04:26 AM
3

If a man had even a small amount of the absolute toxic evil vicious hatred women demonstrate then he'd be railroaded and destroyed. Women like this are allowed to indulge in their hatred. Women are always indulged, but even if they weren't, a hatred for men greater than anything you'd ever see from an ardent misogynist is seen every day on television, in work, in public institutions, and online.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 04:25 AM
6

Everything specific to men is demonized. Every situation where the natural tendencies of women differ from the natural tendencies of men, the natural tendencies of men are considered evil. Marriage is an institution by which men are turned into utilities, pack animals, wallets; in marriage men are expected to eat crow and put themselves second.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 04:15 AM
33

The left today is feminism. Critical theory and intersectional feminism is their dominant political ideology. When left wing presidents and prime ministers go out of their way to pay lip service to it, and their parties works hard to push this ideology throughout all government institutions and as propaganda through news and cultural output then what you have is the new state religion of the left. Identity politics + power dynamics incarnated over and over for each identity group they want to co…
/r/MensRights17/01/25 02:42 AM
5

I mean, it's anti-male sentiment all the way down the stack. It's trained on real data from online which is all anti-male and gynocentric. Then on top of that it's explicitly trained by those who have anti-male and pro-feminist ideologies. Talk about anything gender related with AI and it'll always throw in the little excuses and rationalizations and 'yes but' weasel paragraphs you see in online rhetoric every day. That is, any discussion about men has to be done within the context of how it aff…
/r/MensRights16/01/25 01:28 AM
7

It's just word games; He's just adding a level of indirection to recast from the female perspective and then filling in the blanks with feminist dogma. Feminist dogma is also word game and has no basis in fact; his explanations are comically wrong, long since disproven, and don't hold up to the slightest scrutiny. Word games don't describe anything and they don't solve anything. It's just playing with definitions. Here's the reality: Men are suffering. There are struggles and experiences in mode…
/r/MensRights12/01/25 03:30 AM
7

Remember this when you see all the bad faith actors posting in this sub about how feminism is your friend. The anger at feminism from this sub is highly deserved.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 02:33 AM
5

Does anyone remember that old help line? I think it was in Australia.. the men's domestic abuse hotline ended up being for men who are thinking of being abusers rather than abused.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 02:27 AM
4

"12 women and children die tragically in accident" (buried in the article is that 12,000 died)
/r/MensRights10/01/25 01:40 AM
5

The article says several passionate kisses, but yeah. Of course, a 19 year old male kissing a 15 year old "coworker" on her birthday would be seen in a much more negative light than this will be.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 02:56 PM
6

This alone should have invalidated so much good will, brought so much bullshit into focus for people.. and yet nothing changes.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 02:53 PM
4

I think you know you are a bad faith actor. If not, you are far more than a little brainwashed and ignorant of reality. Maybe you are very young? Don't conflate women's rights or equality with feminism. Very different things. Almost everyone in western countries believes in equality between the sexes and women's rights, but fewer and fewer every year want to be associated with feminism. Consider this: Why would anyone on this sub have a problem with feminism if it actually did what you claim it …
/r/MensRights07/01/25 06:30 PM
1

Men need to be good little slaves. No talk of sexuality with friends even though gossiping about male partners is a standard for women. Don't be single you better be under the thumb of a woman, even though women play the field until they are ready to settle down. No drinking alcohol, but she will go out clubbing on the regular with her friends and you better take care of her when she arrives home drunk. Don't throw a punch unless she wants it, and don't you dare enjoy video games or any other re…
/r/MensRights07/01/25 02:26 AM
1

Look, we gave you your dog and pony show but did you really think we'd let a woman stay in prison long just for harming men?
/r/MensRights07/01/25 02:17 AM
7

Society has become so hostile to men and so obsessed with the female point of view that even things that just make women feel insecure like men having preferences are becoming seen morally wrong.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 01:07 AM
13

While OnlyFans dominates discussions today, the archetype of the lonely man falling for the dancer at the strip club or the sex worker he regularly visits predates the internet by centuries. Even before OnlyFans, there were video chats, chat services, and Twitch streams—platforms where countless men offered gifts in exchange for fleeting attention or face time. These men aren't fulfilling a sexual need but rather an emotional one: a desperate attempt to fill the void of loneliness with something…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 11:32 PM
14

It's been shown in studies that women may have a better ability in non-verbal emotional recognition such as facial expressions or body language. Evolutionary psychologists believe this is a biological trait honed via evolution from our hunter gatherer ancestors on the ancient planes of the pleistocene, where apparently reading the room is beneficial if you are pregnant or have kids and will die without negotiating childcare, resource-sharing, and protection. In contrast, Feminists say it's "lear…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 03:07 PM
6

The movements most sacred tenet is demonizing men as an cruel oppressor class. It smears men with original sin and uses the resulting shame to control them. Men now have the means to learn enough to mind the whip, and they don't like it one bit.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 09:30 PM
2

Yes, feminism belongs to a philosophical lineage that defines truth in subjective narrative terms. Like social constructivism and postmodernism, it emphasizes the role of language, culture, and social agreement in shaping what is accepted as "true." Just convince enough people. In this context language, rhetoric, and narrative are the main tool and a weapons. This stands in stark contrast to other philosophies that focus on empirical truth based on observation, experimentation, and logical reaso…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 09:28 PM
3

Remember that scene in the Matrix where Morpheus and Neo are walking down the street? The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so h…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 07:26 PM
3

An attempt for a man is a failed suicide. An attempt for women is a cry for help. It's like when a woman screams or cries. Either that or women are severely incompetent. After all, women have access to the same information and opportunities men have. It isn't hard to do. Yet men have a far higher rate of suicide.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 06:46 PM
3

It's one of the classic semantic games and word play the ideologically captured use to legitimize all their little hates. At one level it can just be used to smear masculinity and men generally, at another it can be used as a weapon whenever a women is being treated fairly and can't handle it, and because psychology is ideologically captured they also legitimize it by pretending it's an a scientific or professional term. This let's people use it to spread hate and bully people while also giving …
/r/MensRights05/01/25 06:38 PM
8

If memory serves I remember reading they were out for a longer time than you'd think as well. Same kinds of tricks they use when they go up to people and ask them questions just to cherry pick the ones that server whatever agenda the presenter has.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 06:19 PM
32

Man: "Please help.. you're my last hope" Typical therapist, following official APA guidelines: "Have you considered that you are toxic? Mind your male privilege. Maybe have a big cry?" Man: literally dies
/r/MensRights03/01/25 03:35 PM
11

If only they'd just cry more!
/r/MensRights03/01/25 03:30 PM
10

You're talking about waltzing into Mecca of feminism, right into their most devout church, moving up the aisle to the front, and then demanding they change the decor and abandon the religion. Academia is ground zero. Back in the 1960s, Feminists in the academy adapted the marxist meme to a gendered context and used it as a tool to effect political change. It lived on for decades infecting people and slowly transforming the academy but lacking a way to break into mainstream thought. Until the ear…
/r/MensRights01/01/25 04:59 PM
1

You wouldn’t believe how I could absolutely mangle word count based essays in school.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 06:45 PM
5

Women are generally hypergamous. They mate at or above their social, economic, and education status. We streamlined the process for women to get into high income careers and now hypergamy is becoming an issue for them. While innate male sexual preference (young, healthy, fertile) is continually criticized by women and the wider culture, women have faced no such criticism for their preferences and so have no reason to consider their own preferences as problematic in a modern context. So instead o…
/r/MensRights30/12/24 08:39 PM
1

This comes up from time to time. The human mind loves a good binary and so it finds great satisfaction in thinking MRAs and feminism are two sides of the same coin. This isn't correct. First, feminism is not "women's rights". There are many groups and people who do not identify as feminists who still believe in and fight to advance gender equality, and feminism goes far beyond a simple belief in women's rights or equality. Modern feminism is a political ideology born in the 60s based on power dy…
/r/MensRights30/12/24 08:26 PM
1

It's also possible that some of those 40% are overly self-critical and that they "could see themselves" doing it is a reflection of their own low self-esteem. Experiencing negative thoughts about ourselves that aren't representative of who we really are is very common in individuals with depression, for example. I never claimed otherwise. I did not comment on their motivations at all, nor did I cast any judgements. Taking a statistic at face value and using it to form a view of the opposite sex …
/r/MensRights29/12/24 11:50 PM
66

Welcome to the femosphere, the latest dark, toxic corner of the internet… for women The femosphere is literally the mainstream internet. Every active social media platform caters to women primarily. They all allow and promote abject hatred of men in comments and content. The radicalization of young men is a reaction to the radicalization of young women. While there are some marginalized places online where some men can become hateful, the entire internet, our whole culture, including public scho…
/r/MensRights29/12/24 11:32 PM
1

Multiple factors. First, it's far easier for women to succeed with post secondary education. There are more scholarships for them, there are relaxed acceptance criteria in many cases, far more support programs and gender quotas in your favor while you are there as you progress in your academic career. Lastly, University is now very feminine coded which is culturally attuned to most women. All this is created and reinforced by a huge bloated bureaucracy that is overwhelmingly female and female-su…
/r/MensRights29/12/24 10:27 PM
3

Among the many other neotenous features women retain, emotional crying is designed to manipulate men by hooking their evolutionary programming into a protector/provider mindset by mimicking juvenile traits. Of course, this is evolutionary: Women have higher levels of the hormone prolactin which promotes emotional crying. As an aside, testosterone inhibits emotional crying. Men, biologically, do not and can not cry emotionally like women. Remember that anytime you're facing down the barrel of som…
/r/MensRights29/12/24 10:01 PM
10

Studies have shown women have a hugely outsized irrational fear of crime and strangers. Feminists have created fear based narratives backed by cherry picked numbers from fraudulent studies to exploit this cognitive bias in women to dial up their fear even further. The chance of being raped, the chance of domestic violence, the chance of being attacked at night while walking are all pretty minimal compared to the perceived risk. For example, we often here this narrative that women can't walk alon…
/r/MensRights29/12/24 05:39 AM
50

It's low risk and high reward. Basically no risk and guaranteed sympathy, attention, get out of jail card, and great suffering inflicted on someone. Even if they get caught there's no real consequences. You're basically creating an easy exploit that women in specific situations are highly incentivized to do and you're only protection is "Hope they are paragons of virtue and don't do this" (they aren't, none of them)
/r/MensRights29/12/24 05:10 AM
74

At least 40%. 40% openly admit to it but there's undoubtedly many more who would do it if it suited them.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 05:07 AM
3

Excellent article. Because feminist dogma dominates all discussions related to gender, things like biology and evolutionary psychology are never discussed and sidelined in preference for bizarre tabula rasa style cultural theories. Of course, in reality it's biology and evolution that actually dictates our behaviors. I don't agree with everything being said, but at least this is meaningful discourse instead of just waxing fictional social theories. Really nice to see someone discussing it.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 11:47 PM
3

In typical fashion, women are forever looking upward. Women are obsessed with some small minority of very powerful men even as they step on the faces and shoulders of an underclass of men utterly invisible to them. Some men are prone to bigger risk taking than all women. Some of those risk taking men are going to win big. Please stop letting being blinded by the winners and pretending there are no losers and that there isn't an ocean of men who also weren't even in the game. Hypergamy is some do…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:11 PM
6

Attack me or hate it if you want, but women do not consider men generally. They just don't. The only thing that changes that as far as I've seen is having male children or seeing the system brutalize someone they care about first hand. (father, brother, etc.) There are also grand societal narratives involving women and their struggles that propagandized everyone. Women in particular as the 'oppressed' and 'victim' group in these narratives become even more hostile to the perspective or suffering…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:04 PM
9

It's honestly pretty bad, a whole generation of women have been radicalized online and their hate is encouraged. Women are heavily incentivized into hate. Every day on social media sites, including reddit, I see some of the most vile, hate filled, generalized, mad toxic shit from women in regards to men. The slightest comment on women or comment in sympathy with men is met with an onslaught of extremist rage that doesn't even address what was said. These comments are so overflowing with hate tha…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 07:50 PM
12

There is quote often attributed to Stalin, although probably incorrectly: "The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of millions is a statistic." Unfortunately, at the scale of war, the dead are not often treated with the dignity and humanism we would had someone died in our own lives. To avoid disease we often put bodies in trenches and burn them en masse. I don't know the the psychology at play, but it does not surprise me that the unscrupulous would find ways to exploit the large amount of…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 07:34 PM
1

I think I disagree. Evolution is about best fit to an environment. The environment we live in today is vastly different from the ancient Pleistocene landscape our ancestors inhabited. I don't see that much strong evidence we need to feed men into the meatgrinder to get by in a modern context. Certainly a nation state with modern technology does not need to sacrifice men en masse due to gender asymmetry in biological reproduction, modern warfare, securing food, etc I wouldn't advocate something a…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 07:24 PM
12

You are not the crazy one. Feminism is a gaslighting machine. It's a brutal narrative onslaught again boys and men. In a narrative war feminism will win for various reasons I won't get into here; Let's just say it is almost impossible for men to win that battle against women. So you have to cut through narrative. Look at data. Look at studies done within or in conjunction with the hard sciences. That represents an objective truth that the feminist narratives can not henpeck and badger away. Femi…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 06:58 PM
6

Damn I wasted my time trying to help someone not even smart enough to understand how comments and channels work sociologically. Just lost in your own emotions. I won’t respond again because you are a waste of my time, but I challenge you to prove your assertion that I think I’m superior to women based on anything I said. It’s all in your head. The hate you read into others is the hate inside you. If you realize that much, realize you’re the bad person in this exchange here that needs to change.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 03:55 PM
13

Hah, got under your skin, huh? I admit my comment has a high dose of irreverence, but such is justified when trying to break the programming of those who were taught to worship the modern day golden calf. If you're so concerned with the sub then you should probably be condemning the post itself rather than sniping the comments of individuals. All you're doing is searching through the weeds to confirm your preexisting bias. Also, don't claim you've abandoned this sub. You're attempting to control…
/r/MensRights23/12/24 08:00 PM
28

Women do not care about you. They don't care about men generally. They don't empathize with men generally. Men are just tools to women. Security, labor, money, etc. A beast of burden. So, when you tell a woman about something like this what they actually hear is "This man is a damaged tool.". If they don't have much attachment to you they will probably just leave you. If you seem like you'll be a really good provider or if they've got a lot invested in you, then they see it as a maintenance prob…
/r/MensRights23/12/24 05:46 AM
8

Can't be true, false accusations are a myth. /s It's ok, I'm sure now that the truth is out there will be some, small repercussion for the girl. Anything? No?
/r/MensRights23/12/24 05:38 AM
55

Makes sense. With almost all girls being pushed into post-secondary education using a massive amount of gender specific scholarships, and a much easier acceptance criteria you end with a massive gender imbalance in colleges and universities. Those women are all going to be looking to establish careers before marriage (which they will get to due to affirmative action programs and other bias in hiring). Couples are also fine living together longer today outside of marriage, even to the point of ha…
/r/MensRights23/12/24 05:31 AM
3

The USA has a giant all-volunteer professional army with increasingly technical sophistication required by front line troops. Luckily, It's unlikely they will need to fall back on a draft.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 05:25 AM
13

Brother, saying we need to advance men's rights because other men won't have conviction if world war 3 starts is a wild take. Instead I'd hope that as men's rights advances we would move beyond feeding male citizens to the war meatgrinder to serve the interests of women and the powerful. We should be fighting to stop the sacrifice of men for the interests of others. There is no idea more fundamental to men's rights than that of male disposability.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 04:48 AM
1

Good point.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 04:04 AM
3

The truth I rarely see spoken here. It's just battle computer, boys.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 12:24 AM
4

And the evolutionary psychology of hunger-gatherer tribes. Women who get pregnant and have children needed to rely on other women a lot in a tribal setting. That's also why women are more conscientious and consensus driven.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 12:20 AM
63

A child? She was 15. Can we stop saying ridiculous shit like referring to anyone one day younger than 18 as a "child"? A fifteen year old knows suicide is real. A fifteen year old knows about mental illness. A fifteen year old knows driving someone to suicide is wrong. Even if you want to pretend she was too young to realize what the consequences could be, and she was just playing games online, being edge, trolling etc - she still cheered and laughed as the man was burning and dying live in fron…
/r/MensRights23/12/24 12:16 AM
122

That evil man traumatized her by following through with the suicide she drove him to. /s The worst part is because the tribe didn't hold her accountable, female psychology guarantees she won't have a single drop of remorse for her actions and will just go through life happy as a clam. She's just making these noises now to recapture the feeling of specialness and attention she got when she first murdered the man.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 12:05 AM
3

She's just cynically exploiting the case of Gisèle Pelicot and the notoriety of Andrew Tate (what year is this??) to advance her own radical feminist agenda. Neither have anything to do with the UK, nor the typical experiences of women. She's a dyed in the wool man hater. She openly mocked men, and international men's day, raged and ranted in parliament when people raised the notion of discussing men's issues, laughed publicly when male suicide has been brought up, scoffed at the idea of address…
/r/MensRights22/12/24 08:32 PM
17

The sad thing is that it always affected them, they are just so lost in their hate they were cutting off their nose to spite their face.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 07:57 PM
3

Given the insane lengths they go to in order to perpetuate the gender pay gap myth, I really can't imagine how fucked that one country that passes really is. It's mind boggling we bother running studies and gathering stats on what any reasonably intelligence adult should instantly know is a bullshit category.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 05:20 AM
9

Everyone is soft on girls and women. They get away with anything, they are constantly validated, life life on easy mode, etc. Just a fact of life.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 05:17 AM
4

Are you sure? Looking it up, seems the earliest recorded evidence of marriage ceremonies uniting one woman and one man dates back to approximately 2350 B.C. in Mesopotamia. Though they operated on a barter system, there was definitely 'income' then in the form of silver and grain. We have evidence of contracts and wages, etc. Earlier than that we don't know as we're getting pre-writing. In hunter gatherer tribes there is evidence for many mating strategies, but we are pretty sure one man one wom…
/r/MensRights22/12/24 05:11 AM
10

Real talk: Marriage is a Hail Mary gamble. It has a very small chance of being successful and if it is, studies show you're likely to be happy, financially secure, emotionally well. However, there's an overwhelming chance that it won't be successful. Most end in divorce, and most of those highly favor women, so much so that women are basically incentivized to divorce and initiate 70% of them. Men often end up absolutely obliterated emotionally and financially in divorce. The divorced middle aged…
/r/MensRights22/12/24 05:02 AM
4

Have to be a jerk and say I disagree with that interpretation of American Beauty. American Beauty is actually a good example of a movie that I feel doesn't explicitly cast judgement on it's own; although people watching it today are so propagandized I doubt they can view the movie with an open mind. That being said, obviously broad strokes you are correct.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 04:38 AM
7

"All people are equal but some are more equal than others." There is a critical imbalance in how society categorizes and prioritizes different forms of violence. The special focus on domestic violence and femicide in Western countries is not rooted in objective data but rather in historical legacies, advocacy efforts, and cultural narratives that amplify certain issues while downplaying others. This focus obscuring the far greater victimization of men in other homicide contexts, which also deser…
/r/MensRights21/12/24 10:19 PM
14

From a very early age we teach boys about stereotypical male biological behaviors and how they can be harmful. We educate them on how to mediate and deal with them. Boys are taught introspection. We could do the same with girls - starting with things like their in-group bias - but instead we continually and endlessly validate all behavior and every feeling. We treat every impulse they have as justified. They are never taught to introspect or to mediate whatever feelings or psychology that arises…
/r/MensRights21/12/24 09:28 PM
4

I can think of a few reasons. Feminism and other virulent social ideology has spread like wildfire within academia for decades but has not really have the right conditions to flourish far beyond that and permeate mainstream culture. Things have changed in the past two decades. First, we've moved from a situation where only a few students would go to post-secondary to one where almost every student is encouraged to go to post-secondary, which has lead to a dramatic increase in both number of infe…
/r/MensRights21/12/24 09:14 PM
11

And if war does break out, the women that men will be sent into the meat grinder to die for will abandon the country en masse, using refugee status to immigrate to western nations. As the men fight and die, we'll see endless articles about how women are the truth victims of war because gee gosh dating is harder.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 12:37 AM
2

Honestly, literally everything. No matter how bad their behavior is, people will make excuses for them, and will look into their past to find out what trauma caused it and what man is really responsible. Women have an incredible in-group bias and men are soft on women. This is all doubly (triply, quadruply) true if the shit she is getting away with has anything to do with a relationship or sexuality. Instantly "what did he do to her" "I need her side" "she must have been at her wits end" etc. Th…
/r/MensRights17/12/24 12:33 AM
10

We hear over and over again about how young men are being radicalized. About misogyny and incels. Yet, we hear nothing about the clear and purposeful radicalization of entire generations of young women into extremist misandrist hate mongers. I mean, I see things as evil as her manifesto literally every day on social media. A gender swapped version of the typical man-hating content would get immediately removed and the user would be banned, but misandrist content is met with mass upvotes and appr…
/r/MensRights17/12/24 12:24 AM
1

The problem with the left is that they can not have this conversation unless it's couched in leftist ideological dogma. Consequently, the few people on the left who speak about men's issues are forced to continually half apologize for the topic while spending every second sentence validating women and the feminist position. Certain tracks of thought and inquiry are simply off limits. Conclusions are often way off due to having to define boys problems in context of the existing gender paradigm wh…
/r/MensRights12/12/24 05:49 AM
16

We've all been there, brother. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. At least you were able to have your prior beliefs validated.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 05:25 AM
18

The truth is that men built the world for the sake of women. Women decided they wanted to run it instead so men handed it over. Now nothing new is being built and the world is rotting. Now women have their hands on the controls but also seem to resent it at the same time. They throw endless hatred on men who no longer have purpose or meaning in their lives. Personally, I think I got one or two more years left in me and then I'm out.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 05:22 AM
21

They weren't always crap at coming together. Yes, men lack the inherent biological in-group bias that women have, but it's still perfectly rational to band together when the need arises. Men have done that time and time again throughout history. Western countries used to have many fraternal organizations. Each has been systematically dismantled or restructured by feminists and modern power structures one by one. Men act collectively within a cultural context rather than a biological one, and as …
/r/MensRights09/12/24 02:45 AM
27

Well you have to understand. Women are simply a privileged class. It doesn't matter if it's a man's rights, or the law, or tradition, or our deepest beliefs as a society.. it will all get sidelined and put in the trash to serve the interests of selfish women. Even though there were assurances and laws designed to protect donors, these women decided they wanted free shit from the sperm donors. And, of course, they got it. I guess you could say the deepest belief in our society is serving women's …
/r/MensRights09/12/24 02:37 AM
53

I would never date a girl who was bisexual, because that means they also sleep with men, and men are so dirty that I'd never want to sleep with a girl who had slept with a man. Hatred of men is so common and mainstream sometimes you really have to sit back and really let yourself be shocked by the absolute level of hatred. Even associating men with disease. Yet saying this cost her nothing.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 02:30 AM
7

Remember, all the fantasies feminists imagined men were doing with 'power' was projection. It's because it's what they would do if they had power. Now they do. It's clear: Women will not help men the way men helped women. In fact, the more power they get the more they seem to hate men. Even if men had zero representation and formed a new severely underprivileged lower caste there would not be a single drop of scholarship created in the name of equity and inclusion. Sound extreme? Consider men ar…
/r/MensRights08/12/24 05:24 AM
1

"Can cause physical harm". It's actually a very curious standard, isn't it? After all, almost all domestic abuse women face from male partners does not cause any long lasting or substantial physical harm. Certainly no more than a woman is capable of doing to a man, as you have demonstrated. However, we also understand that physical abuse within a relationship has a psychological dimension. That there is some kind of binding element in a relationship gone wrong that is fueled by abuse of this kin…
/r/MensRights08/12/24 05:03 AM
0

Justify your downvote. Argue any single point or fact I made.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 05:56 PM
-1

I agree with you, but I also feel this is an overly simplistic view. Yes, it goes without saying that men should be anti-feminist and that feminists clearly hate men are misandrist. However, go on social media right now. Post after post, video after video spreading misandry. #menaretrash #abolishmen #maletears #menaretheproblem #yesallmen. Look at any stories online about relationships and you will see a heavy anti-male bias everywhere. Even though average women may not explicitly claim to be fe…
/r/MensRights04/12/24 05:23 AM
66

Essentially what this article is saying, is if women can’t find a man to support them the way they want, then they will need to be supported by our tax dollars. Replacing men with government has been the nature of the woman's vote for decades. In gendered terms, taxes are just a huge wealth transfer from men to women. Why wouldn't they expect the government to pick up the tab for this too?
/r/MensRights04/12/24 04:08 AM
14

In any interaction between a man and a woman, the woman is privileged. The situation has to be extremely clear cut that the woman was in the wrong for anyone to hold her accountable without blaming him to some degree. This is doubly true if the context is a relationship or anything men get demonized for. It’s again doubled if the person viewing is female.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 08:15 PM
10

Thank you, brother.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 12:30 AM
9

It's a grey area but the reddit admins have basically supported the use of these bots as long as it's for the "right reasons"(tm) See also: brigading. Where hordes of toxic people can descend upon any subs they want without so much as a peep from reddit admins if they come from places more equal than equal. Meanwhile a single stray user arriving via a linking from a 'less equal' subreddit will get that whole subreddit scrutinized. As the old saying goes "They think we are evil, we just think the…
/r/MensRights24/11/24 04:57 PM
2

Isn't that over by now? "4B" in the wake of the US election is just a giant temper tantrum done by loser women who didn't get their way. Like toddlers who throw themselves on the ground and cry when they don't get their way at the market. And just like how those toddlers will relent because they ultimately need their parents, western women will never stick to anything like 4B. Their lives revolve around leveraging men. To the extent that these loser women actually stick to their 4B tantrum, the …
/r/MensRights24/11/24 04:50 PM
2

Three things... First, it isn't the majority of users who control the site. Reddit does. Reddit decides what is acceptable and what isn't. They promote some subreddits to the 'front page' and add them to suggestions while others are effectively shadow banned. They shut down actual subreddits they don't like for any arbitrary reason. Similarly with subreddits you have moderators/owners that can practice their own editorial process. Minority messages and misandry messages are amplified by the comp…
/r/MensRights24/11/24 04:44 PM
11

I hear this "popular kids" narrative a lot, but it seems more to me like women (even total loser women) are drawn to money/power and try to co-opt whatever the source is for themselves. Men create, women co-opt. Unfortunately, despite all the lamentations to the contrary, nerds didn't really gatekeep traditionally. And, admittedly, probably have less experience with women than average... so it was a pretty easy takeover.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 06:12 PM
10

Women moving in to a space for men, taking it over and then turning into something that serves their own interests? That thing that never happens, is happening again. Women will watch hours of garbage tier television but rage out if their boyfriends or husbands play games. Well, all the luck in the world to the men who feel they have a legit addiction and want to stop, but we all know 99% of the women there are there because they can't stand their man spending even a little time doing his own th…
/r/MensRights23/11/24 06:05 PM
17

Well, the same people that rigged the admissions system to accept more female applicants is also hard at work in high school and grade school demonizing, demoralizing, medicating, and undermining boys.. so they may yet achieve that goal.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 05:58 PM
12

Not true. I read an article saying women need some small amount of men added to field as a kind of "sub-nurse" that focuses on carrying things, lift things, turning over obese patients, etc. Of course, that's what women who attain power want for all men.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 05:54 PM
10

You proved his point exquisitely.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 05:48 PM
3

Women making up majority of some fields, men making up majority of some fields. World: This is evil. We need equality! After rigging the system, women make up the majority of all fields. Women vastly overrepresented in universities and colleges, yet still have lower standards to get accepted and more scholarships. More qualified men locked out of higher incomes and the futures those fields represent. World: This is an amazing breakthrough! More equal than equality itself!
/r/MensRights23/11/24 05:40 PM
14

That is a bit of a simplification. There are many training and processing steps that go into a product like ChatGPT. As you said, data collection inherently introduces selection bias. During preprocessing, raw data is filtered to remove content deemed harmful, irrelevant, or otherwise unsuitable. Then you have unsupervised pretraining. This is the magic. The transformer step. After this an LLM could be considered complete. But it doesn't end there for OpenAI: Next they used Human supervised fine…
/r/MensRights22/11/24 03:27 AM
22

That simply isn't true. It's highly regional. In some regions that's true, but in many others all you have to do is cohabitate as a couple even without any intent of marriage. In some you don't even need to cohabitate, you just need to have finances intermingled or have provided for someone. This one from Canada is wild: https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/no-home-or-kids-together-but-couple-still-spouses-appeal-court-rules
/r/MensRights21/11/24 03:43 PM
18

Agreed. I feel like it's more correct to say men enjoy having "meaning" in their lives. Providing can provide a sense of meaning, but it isn't the only way to have meaning.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 03:33 PM
13

Yes. Obviously pending your definition of hate and obviously not all women but, for the first time in history, I would confidently say 'most' thanks to the the internet + a generation of women having grown up online. Anti-male sentiment from the average woman is now expected. Not frothing hate, but more typically a set of implicit biases and automatic reflex to attribute negativity to men and view them in black and white terms. Maybe you ask because you think hate is anything special or has to b…
/r/MensRights21/11/24 02:54 PM
2

I think there is a few things at play. First, you are 100% correct. Women focus in on this one specific behavior so hard because they lose value in the sexual marketplace as they get older. They demonize it because they feel it disadvantages them. Second, due to hypergamy, women have a massive bias where they are hyper focused on rich men, powerful men, etc. The same men that are more likely than the average man to date younger and more attractive women as they age. So the threat they feel becom…
/r/MensRights21/11/24 05:29 AM
0

The same reason so many feminists are against sex work even though ideologically they should be 100% for it. It reduces their market value. Women have a sophisticated relationship with men that involves leveraging him for resources, security, labor, protection, investment. By contrast, men have a simple relationship with women. Women don't have a lot to offer men if they lose sex.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 08:50 AM
5

It's a machine. It doesn't get pissed off. It doesn't get happy, it doesn't get sad. It doesn't laugh at your jokes. It just runs programs. Gemini is just a really sophisticated autocomplete. All you're doing is sampling modern society tempered by what corporate america thinks it's acceptable values. We hardly need Gemini to know that both are rabidly anti-male.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 08:47 AM
47

Women convince themselves they have it worse because it's mostly women who trauma dump on everyone. But talking about their trauma is actually a secondary effect. The core reason they do it is that people actually care about women. Women engage in crying, screaming, trauma dumping, etc because it's all profitable for them. People pay attention and people try to fix their problems. If men do any of that people turn away and that man will eventually be ostracized by the group. It creates problems …
/r/MensRights20/11/24 08:43 AM
3

No, I was just speaking generally. I know very well they want to close women’s prisons.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 01:56 AM
4

I've always said nine tenths of feminism is projection. All of their hyperbole isn't just a useful narrative tool, but it's also exactly what they would do if they got power.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 09:33 PM
9

Damn, nice list. I still remember when I was much younger and first investigating all of this. I asked feminists, "How will feminism help men?" an the answer was "When the patriarchy is dismantled men's problems will also be solved". As if by magic. In other words, they don't plan to address problems men face at all. They have a utopian "end state" in mind where in men will also be saved, but until then we must forever privilege women's concerns and issues. As OP has pointed out and cited, such …
/r/MensRights17/11/24 06:00 PM
7

It's just not in their programming. Evolutionarily, women have a proven massive in-group bias that men simply lack. Women use men as a means to security, and it doesn't make sense to humanize the person you use as a tool. In every interaction a man has with a woman he should always be asking himself, "what is the strategy?". The only thing that could make women consider men or have sympathy for their position would be early education into their innate biases. However, even though all of this is …
/r/MensRights17/11/24 05:33 PM
5

"Women most affected."
/r/MensRights14/11/24 05:51 PM
8

Man, this is so gross. Total sad, pathetic, pick me. Remember: 55% of men voted red and 43% blue. 54% of women voted blue, with 44% voting red. Two things should jump out at you. It's not a fucking landslide. Democrats are throwing a lot of men under the bus who voted blue. But their hatred of men supersedes reason. The numbers are mirrored. The same amount of women voted blue as men voted red and vice versa. Yet in the media it's men who are evil, men who voted wrong, men who must be punished w…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 02:13 AM
24

4B is a temporary temper tantrum being thrown mostly by women for whom it doesn't make a difference (undateable, old, unkempt) and based in hatred of men. All the 4B rhetoric is basically "Punish men by withholding sex! Fuck men! Men!" It revolves around hatred of men. You don't hear men say "I'm punishing women by going MGTOW! Me going MGTOW is going to make women pay for voting wrong!". MGTOW is just that; men disengaging from a prescribed path, often after getting run through the meat grinder…
/r/MensRights13/11/24 02:01 AM
9

focuses on deradicalisation within the manosphere Complete hates men, shits on them, kicks them when they are down. Definitely going to de-radicalize.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 01:52 AM
7

It's far more dangerous to walk alone at night if you're a man than if you're a woman.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 01:48 AM
1

In the study the 2-10% number comes from, in order to be considered a false-allegation it must reported to police and proven false. All of the allegations that were not proven false are not in that statistic; so the statistic isn't "2-10% are false" it's actually "at least 2-10% are false". The actual number could be far higher. You might then say "Then why there so many rapes?" There isn't. Same problem. The number of "allegations" that are proven true is actually also small. It's actually incr…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:27 PM
24

Always the same, boring, irrational, analysis. Over and over again. The fact that women turned out in record numbers of Harris is unremarkable and yet the fact that young men turned out numbers for Trump speaks to a great evil, something dark and festering in the dark corners of the internet called "radicalization"! The fact that young women voted left means they examined the platform and policies and took a progressive stance in line what they considered their best interest. The fact that young…
/r/MensRights11/11/24 05:17 AM
3

This study/article is shit. Conflates "feminism" with "women's rights" and "progress towards gender equality" and is therefore invalid. Almost no one in the "< 50 democratic men" that think "feminism does more harm than good" believe women shouldn't work or that a woman can't be president or that we shouldn't have gender equality, etc. Feminism is none of those things. Are [>50] out of touch? Yes. Others have elaborated why, but in the 2000s the internet provided a vector for harmful ideologies …
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:48 AM
1

Feminists for a literal decade: MGTOW IS TOXIC. MGTOW IS MISOGYNY. Also feminists: 4B! 4B movement now! We need to punish men with 4B! Once again, feminists prove their are just projecting. They see "men going their own way" as misogyny because for them disengaging is rooted in misandry. They think they are punishing men by disengaging. However, MGTOW was never rooted in hate or misogyny. It may be rooted in a lot of pain, suffering and trauma - especially for men who went through the post-marri…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:30 AM
19

I didn't expect the Guardian of all publications to release this story I mean, it's clearly a left wing article speaking from a left wing place and obviously believes anything conservative or right wing is an evil. They are clearly just lying, straight, boldly about events. Specifically the republican messaging. I could debunk so much of it but I'm not going to bother. There's a bigger issue at play. I'm seeing this a lot as democrats come to term with their loss. I keep hearing the same talking…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:21 AM
1

Society: Restructures grade school and high school for girls success at the cost of boys learning, offers way more scholarships for women with higher payouts, changes application process for post secondary education making it much easier for women directly at the expense men, creates one way affirmative action programs for male dominated industries but none for female dominant ones, justice system gives men harsher sentences for the same crime, divorce heavily favoring women, family courts heavi…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:41 AM
1

Wait, did anyone care? It's weird, it's notable, but I don't know that anyone is bothered.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 11:55 PM
5

Yeah most are real - but never forget that the US has a population 334 million. If we half it, then half it, then half it again the sample size is still so massively large it is a forgone conclusion you'll be able to find 20-30 videos of whacked out people having total meltdowns.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:14 AM
15

The nature of the human race. Everything and everyone favors women. Men aren't going to get shit unless it helps women indirectly or they seize it for themselves.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:11 AM
17

It's going to be very difficult, they've built their entire house of cards on scapegoating men. They used that hate to build their solidarity. Even that desperate ad the democratic party put out trying to reach men was pretty passive aggressive and denigrating.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 05:32 PM
7

The more power women get, the more they will attempt to leverage every single thought and action of men to their own benefit.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 05:19 PM
5

Anything men create, women will work tirelessly to co-opt, control, and divert to their own ends. It's the nature of the human race. This is par for the course.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 05:17 PM
4

Reality never mattered. Facts never mattered. Women fell in line behind her because she is a woman.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 02:21 AM
4

"Why won't men for vote us???" Commercials aimed at men emasculate and shame them and can barely hide their contempt for men Commercials aimed at women show men as tyrannical where women have to sneak around them and dodge their passively threatening remarks about who to vote for.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 08:08 PM
65

I always find this framing interesting, because studies show women are actually moving left far faster than men are moving right. Further, the whole Overton window has also shifted left so it's really more like men are the same or slightly right of where they always were while women have been doubly radicalized. Women are more likely to vote democrat than men are to vote republican. You don't see the republican party and media ranting about how "women must be scared" or "real women vote right" o…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 08:03 PM
5

If men suddenly vanished there would be mass casualties within weeks and society would collapse within months. That's because the "dirty" and "dangerous" jobs that constitute our core infrastructure are done almost entirely by men. Critical shortages of food, water, and medical supplies would occur rapidly. Most people don't understand just how much cities need a constant import of goods and how fast they consume them. Grocery stores would be empty within days. Power plants, which even today req…
/r/MensRights02/11/24 03:03 AM
5

What the fuck does portraying men as monsters have to do with "not settling for less than they deserve"? Do they just screech random slogans at each other now?
/r/MensRights02/11/24 02:42 AM
6

It's just full on projection. She hates herself and is all of those things and so she has projected them on to an entire gender that evolutionary psychology has bound her to and society says is free game to hate. Every time I argue with someone like this I present studies, facts, evidence based claims and they present their feelings and think they won out. They are fucking clowns. Absolutely zero accountability, self awareness, introspection, or even basic learning. I've never understood how the…
/r/MensRights02/11/24 02:38 AM
133

I always find this framing interesting, because studies show women are actually moving left far faster than men are moving right. Further, the whole Overton window has also shifted left so it's really more like men are the same or slightly right of where they always were while women have been doubly radicalized. Yet, no one ever talks about "The woman problem". It's gotta be men who are the problem. As usual.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 02:30 AM
5

Hey, at least she outed herself early. Imagine being stuck out and she lays all the self-hatred and the bitterness she has with life that she's projecting onto men all over you.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 02:23 AM
23

misandrist: men are shit men are garbage kill all men men should suffer we need to reduce male population get in any kind of trouble misandrist: I can't believe the men just stood around and watched! What ever happened chivalry!
/r/MensRights01/11/24 04:52 PM
27

If you think "patriarchy is a lie" is misogyny. Or that being critical of against feminism is misogyny then I'm sorry - you have total ideological brain rot. Complete, unmitigated, terminal brain rot. Also, I've literally never once read in my life that the female orgasm doesn't exist except in ironic sense.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 04:48 PM
18

Don't ignore magnitude to create a false equivalency. Misogyny exists, but misandry on social media outweighs it 20 to 1, misogyny gets people banned while misandry doesn't, misogyny is condemned while misandry is public policy. Even assuming men do the same, that wouldn't justify women doing it. Two wrongs and all that. Whataboutism is not an argument.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 04:45 PM
6

Why would they hide it? They've been taught all their lives that men are lesser, and they've been given sanction all of their lives to hate men. In that environment the smallest spark will lead to overt hatred. When bullies are dissatisfied with their own position, they will turn around and bully people who have been made lesser and othered.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 04:40 PM
3

I feel like you just make that up because you have a chip on your shoulder? The “women are wonderful effect” holds true cross culturally so your explanation doesn’t fit. Anyway, it’s quite clear both conservative and progressive elements are gynocentric.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 07:35 AM
4

The prevailing gender narrative in our society is that men oppress women. Every thing gender related is always twisted by this framing. Abortion is considered a women’s rights issue, women’s rights is controlled by feminism, feminism says all issues are caused by men or patriarchy. Therefore abortion rights is about evil men and any woman who disagrees conveniently has internalized misogyny. In reality support for abortion is not strongly correlated to gender at all. It’s cultural and regional. …
/r/MensRights29/10/24 07:27 AM
2

They have a completely different idea of what a femcel is than what I've read about and observed in femcel their spaces. From what I've observed they are generally unattractive women (by their own admission) who are extremely bitter they weren't able to snag the 'rich and handsome' man and live the dream life they sold themselves. While incels are defined by not being able to have sex and the baggage that goes with that, Femcels are defined by their inability to get into a long term relationship…
/r/MensRights28/10/24 04:39 AM
20

You're missing a huge part the story. It's mostly female teachers that exhibit this bias. All teachers reward conscientious students which are more likely to be girls, but female teachers have a massive bias in favor of girls. In my opinion, female teachers should be forced to undergo bias training because it's pretty much an open secret at this point that numerous studies have proven. Instead, female teachers come from backgrounds that emphasize feminist principals so they actually end up far m…
/r/MensRights23/10/24 10:58 PM
3

Only men are held accountable generally, and only men hold themselves accountable generally. In terms of people being soft on women, what your describing is the Women-are-wonderful effect. People tend to view women the way you described. Women also have an incredible in-group bias (4.5x strong than men have). Just sit back and really imagine having an unconscious bias 4.5x in favour of your own gender must really be like. Another interesting thing is that when men have a bias or behavior that is…
/r/MensRights23/10/24 10:49 PM
15

Women live in a world of 'belief'. They are obsessed with what people believe, framing devices, narratives, stories. Whatever people believe is true is true. Men live in a more mechanistic world. What's true is what can be objectively be observed to be true. If the water pump is broken it isn't going to deliver water regardless of how you feel about it or frame the issue. If the house is made badly it isn't going to survive the storm no matter if everyone inside believes it to be strong. This is…
/r/MensRights20/10/24 11:30 PM
13

MSNBC analyst coming in with all the nuance and intellectual rigor of an internet shit post. Shocked how many people here are in favor of therapy. An ideologically captured industry that is overtly hostile towards men. The APA codified toxic masculinity and traditional masculinity as expressly harmful in 2018, it's massively female dominated, with a general sensibility completely in line with this MSNBC analyst.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 11:21 PM
3

If a women publicly states anything about men that isn't professing absolute hatred for men she'll get called a pick me. Every time.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 12:55 AM
11

Women are unfortunately wildly consensus driven. They have an insane degree of ingroup bias, and are deathly afraid of being ostracized. Ironically, it creates a mob mentality where they end casting other women out partly to signal solidarity and protect themselves. Every move women make in life has built in plausible deniability.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 12:50 AM
8

Hmm - I'm not sure. It's true on the surface, but I see feminist men as more like overt predators. They are malicious and manipulative, using women's shared delusions and ideology against them with designs to prey on someone. "pick me" men are probably more like regular men who suppress their own feelings and beliefs and speak the party line when women are round because they think otherwise they'll be shunned or their feelings are wrong. Worst case they play this facade with such desperation the…
/r/MensRights20/10/24 12:46 AM
6

Nah, it has nothing to do with women being like children. No one ever thought that. The reason it's "women and children first" is because men are disposable.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 02:08 AM
4

Maybe next she can go pin white feathers on men. It wouldn't happen though because this cunt would never risk going to Ukraine to face the men she wishes to condemn. As she describes a horrific scene where authorities drag a man away to die she does so with the tone of someone getting sexual gratification. Sick disgusting woman.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 01:58 AM
18

it’s like I have to prove “im on of the good guys” Stop trying to prove anything to them. If they prejudge you as a man that is their problem - not yours. If they prejudge all men that is their problem - not yours. If you do meet a woman who doesn't fall into one of those two categories, the last thing you want is to be doing some ridiculous pantomime caricature of "one of the good guys".
/r/MensRights11/10/24 03:02 AM
2

Why does the internet always make excuses for girls and women generally for everything?
/r/MensRights10/10/24 09:35 PM
8

It's obviously insane and it's totally cooked. The number is most often cited from Survey's conducted by Mary Koss and is pretty much invalid. Methodology. A hugely broad definition of 'rape'. In fact, the survey didn't even use the word "rape". It would ask students broad leading questions and then labelled any "non consensual sex act" as rape. e.g. "Did anyone ever rub your shoulders without consent?" "Have you ever gotten drunk with a man and then had sex?" RAPE! The questions were very open …
/r/MensRights10/10/24 03:53 AM
24

That feel when leftists try desperately to reconcile their disgust with amount of black men who were lynched due to the accusations of lying white women while also claiming white women were never believed.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 06:04 PM
4

You will buy the book? Why give this worthless creature any money. You are upset she posts pictures of her kid but you're going to reward her for it.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 05:59 PM
37

I feel like I'm in upside down world. They speak of young men getting radicalized but every day online all I see is "Men need to die. Men are shit. Men are garbage. Men are useless. Kill all men. The world doesn't need men. The Y chromosome needs to die.". It's obvious it's young women who have been radicalized. Every day I read about how women need more opportunity when all the opportunities are already earmarked for women. That men have more power than women when women make up majority of univ…
/r/MensRights06/10/24 05:43 PM
6

An anti-terrorism group set up to fight Islamic extremism being ideologically captured by feminist special interests and used to bludgeon school boys is a stark representation of the absurdity of all of modern society.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 05:31 PM
1

You are if you say you are, and if you advocate for men in any way. Feminism is definitely a monolith. They have different sects but they all share same basic philosophy and political ideology: Patriarchy. Men are powerful and oppressive and therefore women are justified in taking any political action required to rectify that. By contrast, MRAs don’t even have a shared philosophy or political ideology. They come from all political spectrums and have different beliefs. MRA is quite literally the …
/r/MensRights04/10/24 03:23 AM
4

It’s in dog years.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 11:38 AM
18

Divorce can be pursued by either, but in actuality women initiate 70% of divorces. This is because the system favors them. Hence the power disparity. Many power asymmetries are "open ended" on paper but in actuality are biased towards a specific group. That is the case here, and it's by design.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 03:19 AM
6

Correct. It isn't corrupt or incompetent or "accidently not really in the best interests of the child oops". The implementation is the specification. The way it works is how it's meant to work.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 11:31 PM
177

Well, in marriage between men and women, women initiate 70% of divorces. Lesbian couple? Multiply by 2 Gay couple? Divide by 2.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 11:26 PM
64

I disagree that men need to be head or "patriarch" of the family unit to have an ownership stake. Theoretically, men and women can be equal partners in marriage and have an equal ownership stake. The problem is that in modern society men have no power in marriage and therefore no ownership stake at all. He's just there until the woman decides he's not. The state ensures that. In fact, anytime men and would intersect in society for any reason, the state points a gun at the man and gives women 100…
/r/MensRights01/10/24 11:22 PM
3

I think they operate at different scales. This video isn't just about purpose or meaning it's about society and community. Ownership stake is a type of purpose that drives long term investment and management.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 11:18 PM
23

It's Ms Magazine. It's a den of irrational low IQ misandrist shit. When a person is mugged, we don’t tell them that they didn’t fight back correctly or hold onto their purse tightly enough. We absolutely do. "Why were you in the part of town at that hour" When kids are bullied at school, we don’t blame them for being weaker than their opponents, or unable to fight back against other kids. We absolutely do. When a bank is robbed, we don’t blame victims for going inside with money in their wallets…
/r/MensRights01/10/24 11:08 PM
1

This entire way of thinking only makes sense if you view gender in terms of "us vs them". It's a fundamentally irrational worldview. This is a very similar concept to how feminists delegitimize male victims of violence if their attackers happened to be men. The fact that the attacker was a man does not make the victim any less of a victim. Regardless of gender. Also related to another related sleight of hand feminists use. "Would you eat from a bowl of M&Ms if one was poisoned." A flawed analogy…
/r/MensRights30/09/24 10:13 PM
33

Basically "Darn this caught on social media somehow. We'll have be more careful in the future when discriminating against men." They all but admitted it when they said what they did had 'good intentions'. They still think it was a good thing to discriminate against men but just need rethink how to implement that policy.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 10:01 PM
3

Completely normalized. Even on the most sensitive platforms, it's perfectly acceptable for women to spout the most rotten hateful shit imaginable. Of course, when your entire life is nothing but mindless validation, where everything is given to you, when you are taught boys are lesser and base from the moment you start grade school up adulthood, and yet nature has saddled you with this inexplicable connection towards men.. why wouldn't you develop a complex.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 04:14 AM
18

Just one of the lies I was raised with: "Women are peace makers, women don't like violence, women will work to break up fights, and don't like fighting" Actual reality demonstrated a million times since middle school: Girl talks shit, starts fights, eggs on other men to fight on her behalf, cheers frothing from the mouth during fights, often looks for opportunities to kick or hit someone who isn't looking or is pinned during a fight.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 09:27 PM
5

Young women have been out-earning young men for a long time now in many places. “In many places.” Which the article literally supports. When your reading comprehension is so poor, everything you read is left to question.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 12:39 AM
3

I figured! That's why I found some sources. People decide what is discrimination but at least facts are facts.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 10:30 PM
1

Evolutionary psychology as in the innate patterns and biases in our thinking that were molded by the evolutionary process. Things like women's in group bias (4.5x stronger than that of men) and the "Women are wonderful" effect (men and women tend to hold more positive attitudes and stereotypes about women) and gendered attribution bias (attribute women's negative actions to external causes e.g., childhood trauma, abusive partners, or poor parenting), and "tend and befriend" etc. These biases and…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 10:26 PM
6

Are you responding to the right person? I sincerely hope so.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 01:09 PM
25

I thought it was common knowledge. Just look up any school. Here's an article stating that a study California of 11 colleges/universities showed 117 scholarships for women and only 4 for men. On scholarship.com you can find 392 scholarships specifically for women with only 72 for men. I noted scholarships as "non-zero sum" in my original comment, but I think it's still important to note that many women-only scholarships and support programs are based in academic fields that are traditionally mal…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 04:39 AM
2

Yeah, I agree. I think I mentioned in my comment how rare it really is. It's good to be wary. That's why I have my litmus test.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 03:13 AM
1

It's wild to me that you can just teach radical left wing propaganda to children and that's now ok. Saying "traditional masculinity is bad" and conflating it with "Toxic masculinity" but then going to say "courage" and "strength" are good traits is just a thinly veiled attack on conservatism. Then of course, boys get slathered with original sin from which there is no redemption with the misogyny song and dance. I'm sure the next slide over covers 'misandry' right?
/r/MensRights23/09/24 03:08 AM
20

Women that have taken up the mantle have done a lot for the MRM. Karen Straughan was one early influencer that caused me to learn about the MRM. Prim Reaper is a huge advocate for boys and men. The other Honey Badgers Allison Tieman (this vid) and Hannah Wallen. Cassie Jaye is a film maker who really popularized the movement. Janice Fiamengo is great. Christina Hoff Sommers wrote "The War on Boys" landmark work for the Mens' Rights. Diana Davison of the Lighthouse project. I think you have to di…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 02:48 AM
9

"Young women are starting to leave men behind" is too buzzfeed style? In any case, it's a euro article. British.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 02:25 AM
18

When it comes to men, the official party line seems to be "The beatings will continue until morale improves - or else."
/r/MensRights23/09/24 02:20 AM
21

That's ok, now that women are the majority of graduates they are pretty close to lobbying the government to literally forgive student debt.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 02:19 AM
53

Starting? Young women have been out-earning young men for a long time now in many places. That's what happens when you give more scholarships to women, make admissions easier for women, and double down on it even as women make up the vast majority of students. The fact that it is now a general truth for whole countries is proof that it's well beyond the "starting" point. Note also that women naturally go into lower paying fields. So it's doubly shocking. Men are now being subjugated into vanishi…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 02:10 AM
3

Easy. You start with a conclusion and set it in stone. Then you get one hundred studies. Throw out the ninety-nine studies that go against your conclusion. Keep one study that supports your conclusion. Then write article. (The conclusion here isn't that men get custody or whatever; it's simply that men are bad.)
/r/MensRights15/09/24 04:25 PM
3

It's just a completely typical feminist article: irrational, hateful, full of anecdotes, cooked numbers, drawing wild unsubstantiated conclusions, editorializing studies, and references that do the same. The most interesting thing about this article is that it continually calls out "mens rights activists". That's like a blast from the past. Reminds me of early to mid 2010's. Today, most feminists have accepted defeat on directly attacking male advocacy, and instead have started more insidious ca…
/r/MensRights15/09/24 04:22 PM
3

Women when man is a piece of shit. Destroy him. Burn him. Kill him. Disgusting man. Typical man. We choose the bear. Women when woman is piece of shit: And what did he do to cause her to act that way? What's the whole story? I need to her her side of the story.
/r/MensRights15/09/24 03:09 PM
2

Women does wrong. How could this happen? Examine her childhood, her parents, the people in her life, and society. Which is to blame? Was she mentally well? What caused this poor woman to do wrong? Was it secretly her abusive boyfriend pulling the strings or maybe her father abused her? Men does wrong. Actions have consequences. No excuses. You aren't a child anymore. Everyone has baggage. Context is irrelevant. Your mental health doesn't change what you did. Society oppressing you doesn't change…
/r/MensRights15/09/24 03:05 PM
7

Evolutionary psychology.
/r/MensRights14/09/24 07:45 PM
3

You are too far gone. Take time off from gender war and try to cleanse yourself of the hatred and maybe your activism will be meaningful someday. This was just me celebrating men in a place men who are demoralized and feeling dehumanized will see it. You should really take time to consider why that bothers you so much.
/r/MensRights14/09/24 07:38 AM
3

Who said anything about women? This post and my comment were about men. No one said there weren’t great women who did amazing things and contributed to our cultural understanding of the human condition and more. There are so many; but this wasn’t about women. If you can’t even stand to see a post about men and advocating for men without getting defensive and engaging in whataboutism then maybe you need to take time to detox from gender ideology. This isn’t a zero sum game. Helping men does not m…
/r/MensRights14/09/24 06:50 AM
3

You misunderstood the argument. The argument was not that men don't have the capacity to do bad things. Everyone has that capacity. The argument was about the human condition. Maybe you aren't educated and you don't know what that is? The human condition encompasses the fundamental experiences of life, including birth, suffering, love, conflict, and mortality, along with the search for meaning and connection in a transient existence. It reflects both the shared struggles and the pursuit of purpo…
/r/MensRights14/09/24 05:47 AM
4

Feminists were not just lying, they were projecting. The reason it was so easy for them to imagine their own oppression is because it’s exactly what they would do if they were in positions of power.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 11:57 PM
6

The APA writes hateful articles about toxic masculinity. Misandry is epidemic in the field, as it is in all women dominated fields. No male dominated field could fathom the depths of their hate and their willingness to encode it in their own industry to ensure unequal outcomes. This is all obvious from cursory research, but I have my own experiences as well. With two separate psychologists berating me for being depressed due to male privilege and assigning affirmations of gratitude about how wom…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 11:45 PM
16

They really are obsessed with cloaking themselves in the legitimacy of science. Then they spew this pseudo scientific vomit everywhere. Then again, not so funny when you realize how many hate-mongering murderers throughout history have also used pseudoscience to justify their own atrocities.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 11:24 PM
27

This kind of article being the norm, and similar misandry being accepted everywhere, and all women casually espousing hate filled statements about men we are told men are the problem to solve. This is why I always find it funny and tragic that there is an obsession with the radicalization of some small minority of young men. Entire generations of women have been radicalized online into hate mongers of such magnitude that even the most bitter misogynist would blush.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 11:23 PM
4

Feminists have successfully transformed the zeitgeist into something that is anti male. Schools, universities, laws, courts, social programs, shows, movies, books, etc are all entirely ant male. All men are dehumanized, all male roles replaced. Males have original sin with no hope of redemption. Males are oppressors. All negative aspects of human nature is attributed to maleness without a second thought. Feminists also view and the world as a zero sum game. So if me get attention it must be take…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 11:16 PM
3

Well, now I feel bad for being hard nosed if you're going to be gracious about my point. I'll drop a total essay in response. There's a few things to think about in terms of history. Who Wasn’t Oppressed? A question you should be asking is; who wasn't oppressed all those centuries? It's not like from the beginning of time men were as free while women were subjugated. Most people throughout history were oppressed in some way, regardless of gender. A huge percentage of both men and women lived und…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 12:08 AM
2

There is no softening. Men were always sensitive and emotional. All men have always just want to love and be loved. Society hasn't changed either. Men are still punished for showing emotion. Women still despise and leave partners who show weakness. Even men opening up online isn't a new thing. Men always talked to other men. Its just that society has systematically destroyed all male spaces.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 10:59 PM
52

"Up to" four years. She'll probably walk with a slap on the wrist and probation. The father is going to do hard time if the state can work it though.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 10:51 PM
5

You betray yourself. No one said women couldn’t do those things. Many women did those things. The point in saying men did those things is proof they aren’t just animals who are interested in fighting and fucking and lacking emotions the way society today tries to claim and speaking to ops point. Neither this post nor my comment had anything to do with women and your defensive need to make it about them is weird and maybe a touch-grass moment. Lastly, Your childish notions of women’s oppression d…
/r/MensRights11/09/24 11:54 PM
4

You mean current day? Absolutely not. You'd need to be brain dead to think any of them exist if you've actually looked into. Most are clearly the opposite (oppressive of men) at even a cursory glance.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 03:41 AM
11

Just remember that most of the great writers, poets, musicians, composers, sculptors, painters were men. These were artists that explored and defined the human condition for all of history. It's ironic that the misandrists that would try to steal the depth of the human condition for themselves by dehumanizing men in this way only know much of the full nuance of these feelings due to men.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 02:36 AM
3

School of life. That's literally everywhere.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 11:08 PM
32

Despite all the work that has been done to educate people in regards to men's rights, there are still widespread misconceptions around legal issues. Can we be perfectly clear: When it comes to any intersection between a man and a woman the system is designed to empower the woman at the expense of the man. Every time. Full stop. Not being the biological father won't save you from child support. Prenuptial agreements won't stop them from collecting alimony or taking your house. Prenups are thrown …
/r/MensRights08/09/24 05:52 PM
13

Incredibly low chance it's real. For the reasons you said. Plus, there's a long history of women online hopping onto these shared oppression narratives and making up stories. In addition to what you said, there is also the court of public opinion which could be leveraged against the company. People have sunk businesses for far less.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 04:46 AM
4

He very clearly and obviously meant "except" and you know it.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 12:23 AM
3

I sincerely hope her extra fingers are only on her right hand for the sake of word play.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 05:17 PM
9

They would gladly throw countless men into the meat grinder if it saved them even a small amount of trouble. Men are beneath their consideration in such matters.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 10:15 PM
1

Evolutionary psychology.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 09:33 PM
2

Was going to say this. Like, what year do they think it is?
/r/MensRights04/09/24 07:57 PM
6

What feminists call "First wave" feminism is a retroactive co-opting of women's rights groups that existed in the in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. However, these women's groups did not use the term feminist to describe themselves and they didn't think of women's causes in a holistic sense nor with the same philosophy as feminists do. Instead they came from varied backgrounds both religious and secular with very different belief systems and focused on very specific causes. Not unlike th…
/r/MensRights03/09/24 12:19 AM
1

Isn't this pointless? It's an absurd scenario that can never happen. Everyone is just guessing by projecting their own biases into it. If they hate or fear men then men will be the villains. Feminist propaganda has taught all women to be afraid all the time despite statistics not backing any of it up because scared people are easier to control and use. Also remember; whenever anyone reads their own biases into a fictional scenario there is no precedent for like this one.. half of it is projectio…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 07:21 PM
8

Boys are forced into an introspective mode from a very early age. They are taught "These behaviors are boy behaviors and they are wrong". Original sin denoted by a chemical marker: Testosterone. It makes continually examining internal motivations and behaviors throughout childhood and adolescence an actual moral imperative. The experience for young girls is very different. Everything is validated. Everything is confidence building. All feelings are valid. All bad actions are due to external fact…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 07:07 PM
16

Feminism was always women > men. It was always sexist. Some quotes from the earliest, regarded, and influential second wave feminist thought leaders (there was no first wave): “I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.” ~Robin Morgan "Rape is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear." ~Susan Bwonmiller "And if …
/r/MensRights02/09/24 06:25 PM
4

I would add. Sometimes it can seem reasonable to have a relationship that is transactional. You can convince yourself you both play a role, you both keep up your part of the bargain, and you are both better off. This won't work. Here's why: In the usual arrangement (man provides) the deal becomes worse over time for a man. The draws on his wealth increase exponentially over time while the value she brings to the table diminishes over time. Women have all the power in relationships because they h…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 06:09 PM
1

I'd be surprised if you can't get a free consultation to see if there is any way you can qualify before moving ahead. If you are forced down the divorce route you'll need a lawyer anyway.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 06:01 PM
1

It's because it works. You can talk about what it means or where it comes from but it doesn't matter. In a war of words reason doesn't matter, rationalism doesn't matter, definitions don't matter, contradictions don't matter. It just matters if it has utility. In this context "incel" is a word of power. Like all such words it derives it's power from the murky depths of zeitgeist. Although in this case it's pretty easy to peg as the combination of the time honored tradition of shaming men for bei…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 05:54 PM
89

Feminism only works within the context of benevolent masculinity. After all, it's not like they armed themselves with weapons and fought a war to force the issue in order to get what they wanted. They cried and the existing power structure - technically controlled men - gave it to them. This is the design of feminism. They use power dynamics and identity politics to cast themselves as victims and use grievance narratives to both galvanize their own group and justify a transfer of resources from …
/r/MensRights01/09/24 05:46 PM
1

I can't pretend to understand your unique perspective but there certainly seems to be a looot of overlap with the cis male experience. I think there's a certain romantic notion women have of the young and prized woman who has many suiters adorning her with attention which she can prioritize and choose between. I think this is just part of the psyche of many young women, but it's possible the intersection of that romanticism with modern dating apps and social media has created a monster where wom…
/r/MensRights01/09/24 05:25 PM
2

Women could be 100% of students and they’d be cheering and celebrating their super-equity. They despise men and want them to have no future.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 03:43 AM
22

Women suffer? Men at fault. Men suffer? Men are fault.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 01:12 AM
11

Therapy is hostile towards men. It’s a field increasingly dominated by women and as that process occurs it becomes increasingly hostile towards men. The APA has adopted feminist dogma with guidelines on “toxic masculinity” etc I’n sure individual therapists may be good, but if the field itself hates men then it’s just another gamble.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 05:53 PM
4

And their society is dying. Feminism is just a gendered variant and ideology that is designed to destroy the status quo. In the case or feminism the status quo is called “patriarchy”. In the racial variant of the meme they call it “whiteness”. Either way it’s a process designed to destroy what is (Hegel, Marx, dialectic, synthesis, blah blah). Unfortunately they have no plan for what to replace it with except unrealistic childish utopian ideas.. meaning if they ever do succeed a Mao or Stalin is…
/r/MensRights29/08/24 05:49 PM
27

You've hit the nail on the head about the unfair and hypocritical treatment faced by men in modern society. And this is only the tip of the iceberg. There are many more aspects where men face unequal treatment and consideration. Like seriously how can you even date a woman when she can blame you for literally anything and she will get believed because a man is always wrong. True that not all women are not like that and just like there are bad and good men so goes for women. But still, I think th…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 08:55 PM
2

Research suggests that reducing recess time can negatively impact boys' academic performance and behavior in school. Recess provides an outlet for physical activity, which is crucial for managing energy levels and maintaining focus, particularly in boys who tend to be more physically active. Without sufficient breaks, boys may struggle with concentration and exhibit more disruptive behavior, potentially leading to lower academic achievement. Therefore It may be more correct to say “It helps girl…
/r/MensRights13/08/24 12:31 AM
1

There is a very long tradition of political ideologies that all operate using the same playbook. Their history goes back the 1700s but let's consider that it began when Marx adapted Hegel's dialectics into material dialecticism. The playbook goes something like this: Establish your target identity group. Establish an out-group and build hate and resentment in your target group by scapegoating the out-group. Say they a more powerful group, and they use that power to oppress your target group. Tel…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 05:32 AM
1

All waves. Well, first wave never existed. Second wave feminists just called earlier women's movements the "first wave" in order to co-opt their work and attempt to legitimize themselves. The second wave feminist leaders of the 1960s were some of the most virulently sexist and hate filled people you could imagine. They disparaged and diminished men with bitter rage and openly advocated for the mass killing and subjugation of men.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 04:56 AM
2

It sounds like you've set up a study by which we must choose between a narrow set of options in order to justify an an overarching strategy by providing no real alternative. Between these two choices, the choice should be up to platform owners and the market. The state should only concern itself with course grained regulation such as non-intrusive age gating, which devices in the private market have implemented anyway. There should be no content that consenting adults should not be able to discu…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 04:43 AM
1

Marriage for men is big risk big reward. If the marriage works out he's usually better off. If it doesn't, he's utterly destroyed financially, socially, and usually alienated from his children. His chances of suicide go way up. The chance of it working out are tiny. Most men will end up wrecked and destitute by marriage. Of course, women risk absolutely nothing. If she wants to end it (and chances are extremely high that she will eventually often out of boredom or some romantic notion) the state…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 04:25 AM
6

The completely accepted mainstream western hetero relationship is women emotionally abusing men.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 04:15 AM
36

Schools have been designed for female success decades ago. Reduction in recess, a focus on conscientiousness, female teachers with proven bias, a refocus on group activities, social activities, and projects. The last bastion of the old school is the almighty test. The one thing that hasn't been designed for girls success and boys failure. Therefore, natural tendencies of genders tend to get demonstrated.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 04:13 AM
3

I've never seen a situation in my entire life where women have not hired women preferentially. Most places I've worked have entire departments that are 100% female despite being in fields/roles with many male applicants available. Swap the genders and it'd be one of great tragedies of our time, but as it's women no one is going to investigate or even care.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 05:07 PM
1

When men dominate a field they roll out the red carpet for women. When women dominate a field it's actively viciously hostile to men. As far as teaching goes.. the industry is actively hostile towards you because women men working with kids is a time bomb. clever kids will know that and use it against you the admin doesn't have any teachers back - let alone a mans. So, after a a few years in a hostile environment with no support you'll finally lose the roll of the dice and career will be destroy…
/r/MensRights05/08/24 05:03 PM
1

When men dominate a field they roll out the red carpet for women. When women dominate a field it's actively viciously hostile to men. As far as teaching goes.. the industry is actively hostile towards you because women men working with kids is a time bomb. clever kids will know that and use it against you the admin doesn't have any teachers back - let alone a mans. So, after a a few years in a hostile environment with no support you'll finally lose the roll of the dice and career will be destroy…
/r/MensRights05/08/24 05:03 PM
3

Bro, I think you're still lying to cover your ass. Women have always been welcomed here and some of the most successful MRA's in history have been women. I don't know why you are being attention seeking.. if you're lonely or what.. but you gotta stop lying. Have some self respect.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 04:56 PM
3

Women. The answer is always women. It isn't just parenting it's anywhere with women.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 04:26 PM
2

It's just moving the goal posts again to maintain an edge.. moving into territories that are less and less objective or provable so they can lie and gaslight about it. Who can measure or prove mental load? How are they proving "women have more mental load for groceries"? Just asserting that it's true? What about the the state of the garage door, the plumbing, the lawn, the car? If you're instinct is to say "women are are aware of those things too" then congrats on playing yourself. The while dom…
/r/MensRights05/08/24 06:25 AM
15

If fitness standards don't matter then why score it quantitatively? Why rank people against each other at all? Why normalize so women have higher ranks for doing less? None of those practices make sense if the goal is what you say. What about combat troops? The fitness standards are similarly skewed without regard to reality for them as well.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 06:20 AM
1

Bill Gates. Jeff Bezos. Elon musk. Normalized for population and women of all social classes divorce when it suits them. Of course, women bag whatever man they can. Not every woman can ensnare a rich man (or richer man).
/r/MensRights04/08/24 08:48 PM
2

It's literally so common for women approaching their 40s to regret not marrying and having children it's a a cliche. Like, an age old trope that almost every person on earth has seen examples of in their own lives. You have to be riddled with brain rot and willfully ignorant to claim otherwise.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 06:44 AM
7

I don't think abortion is a result of a sick society. However, I do think that men should be able to get a so-called "financial abortion". However, we'll probably never see it happen. Here's why. Every social program we have works by collecting taxes from all and using the money to fund social programs. If rearing children is a considered a benefit to society then parents who are in a financially precarious situation should receive support. A centralized, taxation-based system could pool resourc…
/r/MensRights04/08/24 06:33 AM
4

Didn't the guy raise his fist in victory after his ear shot off in an assassination attempt and yell to fight on? I mean, by the standards of people who would say man up, pretty hard not to say that was manly.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 04:29 AM
5

Or, you know, to literally create the arts, sciences, all technology, and civilization itself, etc.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 08:16 PM
17

Whenever you see a woman you have to imagine the entire state standing behind her with a gun pointed at your head - ready to kill you, beat you, rob you, and torture you at her say so. You have no power; it's a process of subjugation you must undergo for the opportunity to procreate, and your kids will eventually get taken from you anyway. You'd be a fool to get married.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 08:14 PM
12

Women are a million times worse at everything they claim men are bad for doing. In every relationship they are more emotionally manipulative, more controlling, more physically abusive, more likely to objectify and use. Yet the grand illusion somehow persists despite evidence every day. Can you imagine if a husband cut off his wife's breasts or mutilated her vagina or uterus? It would be unspeakable. Unimaginable. For women it's just another Tuesday. A light hearted feel good story for them.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 11:49 PM
1

Yes, there's a chance. Divorce rates have gone down, but marriage rates are also way down so that doesn't count for much. Studies show that success is much more likely if your partner haven't had many or any previous partners, if you are both educated, if you have a significant income, if you don't cohabitate before being engaged, if your parents were not divorced, if you are both religious. The real problem is that, as a man, the end of a marriage can ruin your life. The state will strip away a…
/r/MensRights29/07/24 04:04 AM
3

If men were gone and all that remained were women and robots then in some amount of time only robots would remain. Women would unravel. If there's one thing I've learned about feminism, all this bitterness, all this hatred.. is that ultimately women view themselves in relation to men and almost subordinate within relation. Their hate is born from a need and an obsession. A need they resent having and feel they can't adequately service. When it comes to evolutionary psychology, primarily men are …
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:34 PM
1

ChatGPT has a massive feminist and massive pro-female bias. Part of that is just that society has these biases and therefore all it's training data has these biases. Of course, there was editorializing on training data tp make that happen. However, it's clear it's also been specifically programmed in as well beyond the base training data. It's far more insidious, but it's basically no different than Wikipedia or any other typical tech company. ChatGPT will toe the line for the party.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:23 PM
44

I think you'll find "most people" here are neither pro life nor pro choice. That's because unlike feminism, which is firmly embedded within the left, men's rights is more a coalition of various causes and doesn't impose a specific political ideology. I would assume this sub has a gentle bias in favor of pro life. I'm pro choice myself.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:17 PM
51

It's good to be a women. Live life on easy mode. Do heinous shit and walk. If you're conservative then: "Go soft on women, sacrifice men." and if you're a progressive then "Go soft on women, sacrifice men." All the same to women who have the privilege of having their cake and eat it too thanks to a society that will willfully think around the hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:02 PM
11

Don’t forget sexual violence. When it happens to women it’s the plot and the lesson, when it happens to men it’s just a punchline.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 07:46 PM
2

Damn, so shameless, indefensible, self centered, and cruel but they'll just barrel through it skating on female privilege like usual.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 05:23 PM
3

If a woman and a man are involved then the man will typically be found to blame. Women almost inevitably like automatons side with women. Even in the most egregious situations where the woman is clearly in the wrong they'll say things like "I wonder what he did that made her do that" "I'd like to hear her side" "This isn't the whole story." etc. There's also numerous examples of gender swapped stories where people will support, side with, and agree with the woman but after the gender swap will a…
/r/MensRights28/07/24 05:17 PM
7

A male therapist posted that he likes to apologize to female clients on behalf of men. Here's an excerpt of his post: "Is it wrong for me to apologize for my gender working with female clients having relationship problems? When women tell me about their relationship issues, communication problems with men, I have frequently said, you have to understand something about us men, then lean forward with a hushed tone say, "We're dumb. We don't communicate well. We know how to do things but not talk a…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 04:33 PM
1

If positive affirmations work for you then keep using them. Who cares what they are associated with or what other people think. BUT. Also keep in mind that positive affirmations were by men for men long before they became associated with women. Their discovery and use in ancient, and was done by men and documented by men. Positive affirmations were again dusted off and resold by business men to other business men to help with career success in the 60s and 70s. Only very recently has the affirmat…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 01:04 AM
1

By their own standards they are falling 2% short.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 01:00 AM
1

Teach women to treat boys properly This is just a euphemism for mind control. The only thing traditional gender norms and progressive gender norms have in common is that they both sacrifice men to accomplish their goals. Fall in line, soldier.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 11:08 PM
5

If she's an important person then it needs to be challenged. If she's an important person to you then you can engage. If she's some jus some hate filled nobody then she's just another data point. It's important to understand how misandry is spreading and how it's expressed at a cultural level but there's no point in wasting time with each and every femcel loser. Instead of engaging with all of them, understand the cultural forces that put them in thrall to hate and bigotry and challenge that ins…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 11:26 PM
37

Yes, you missed a lot! The "fight for equality" was won a long time ago. It's been about female supremacy, oppressing men, and grifting for decades now.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 08:01 PM
11

Great comment. You've highlighted an essential dualism that extends back to the beginning of recorded history. Every system of thought typically aligns strongly with being either people oriented or nature oriented. People orientation leads to the domain of narratives, framing devices, mysticism, and cults. "If enough people believe it then it becomes true". Nature oriented is the domain of science and empiricism, rationalism, systems thinking, mechanistic thought. Truth is facts, verified throug…
/r/MensRights21/07/24 03:08 AM
2

I'm with you, brother. There's only indications things are going to get worse. I feel like this is all played out. I'm ready to get off the ride.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 09:46 PM
2

Social programs like social security, healthcare, housing is the biggest wealth transfer that exists between any two groups in society: from men and to women. Society wants men to work work work and consume themselves to generate value. When men inevitably break down society would rather they die than become a drain on the system.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 09:42 PM
2

Yet at the exact same time they will claim the medical system is hostile to women, and claim further oppression because researches were fine using men a guinea pigs for medical experiments last century but not women.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 09:39 PM
1

How have you made it this far with such an incredibly low IQ? Grade school level critical thinking you apparently lack: Being male can still be the single largest demographic factor for early death regardless of how men die. Your desperate need to blame men for their deaths is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 09:37 PM
2

Is it time for an Office on Men's Health Can't imagine that happening. Australis created an office for ‘Men’s Behavior Change’ to more brutally oppress them though. I'm sure that will help.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 09:27 PM
2

This conundrum is an unfortunate consequence of the blind spots inherent in the individualist underpinnings of the neo liberalist philosophical structure that dominated the latter half of the 20th century. How people live together, families, and communities are rarely is considered in policy. As far the western bureaucracy is concerned it's pretty weird you share a bed with someone else in the first place. The economy would be better if you just bought two instead!
/r/MensRights20/07/24 09:23 PM
3

There's no pendulum. What historical proof do you see of a pendulum? What 'social progress' was ever reversed? This is a train heading full speed into a wall. The west is managed decline: mismanaged. Pendulum analogies are just copium. If there is a pendulum then it will 'swing back' only in a global sense as brics nations continue to gain ground but that will have nothing to do with you or I. Wrong place, wrong time.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 09:14 PM
24

Were Australian authorities to recognise anti-feminist beliefs as a form of violent extremism, it would represent the most prevalent form of violent extremism in Australia and ought to be seen as a significant threat to national security. Yeah that's true because it's not violent extremism. That's like saying "If people liking the rain was violent extremism, liking rain would be the most prevalent form of violent extremism!". "If everyone who used the internet was a terrorist then internet users…
/r/MensRights19/07/24 02:50 AM
2

Imagine ever believing there was a need for feminism. That shit was taking care of itself long before feminists entered the scene. They've just been power grifting and taking credit for shit for decades now.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 12:56 AM
3

Every generation has been taught relentlessly not to objectify women for 50 or more. Meanwhile, men have always been objectified far more than woman and continue to be to this day.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 12:53 AM
20

In the old days women would get men lynched. Today, they still get the 'community' to do their dirty work for them through false accusations and kangaroo courts like Title IX and HRT. So much more civilized when the man is pushed to suicide instead of having to do it yourself.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 08:41 PM
12

That would be bigotry, silly.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 08:31 PM
9

Every single response is totally unhinged. Like, crazy person unhinged. You can't have it both ways ladies. You can't go online and call men garbage and evil and then expect them to step up for you. You can't abolish gender norms and then expect men to still uphold their end of the bargain. You can't destroy male spaces and community and then expect men to have some shared sense of values like chivalry. Imagine society literally giving you whatever you want and letting you live easy mode but you…
/r/MensRights17/07/24 07:25 PM
5

It blows my mind that anyone would try to empathize or feminists. The feminist political ideology is based on oppression narratives, power dynamics, and identity politics. They are tribal and they are waging a holy war 24/7. When they speak about their issues or views they aren't speaking truthfully or from the heart. It's war. Their narratives are weapons. Their grievances are weapons. Their views are weapons. If you engage with them in good faith then you entering the kill zone. You've likely …
/r/MensRights16/07/24 04:43 PM
2

I know how you feel. I'm much older than you, but even when I was a boy I was hit with a lot of the same propaganda. The aggressive ideologies of today weren't in place then so female supremacy wasn't overtly institutionalized and taught like it is today, but bashing on boys and men was definitely there. Girls were cast as kind, empathetic, humanitarians, and peacemakers with special insight into nature and people. Boys were shown to be apes; aggressive, posturing, territorial, jealous. Of cours…
/r/MensRights14/07/24 10:28 PM
1

women are better adapted to the modern workplace culture. When men are doing well it's a cultural system of oppression called patriarchy and must be abolished. If women are doing better it's just that they are inherently superior and better adapted to a modern workplace culture! society always complains about stuff girls go through.. their low self esteem.. we have to prop them up they say!! Why do they need to be propped up if they are better adapted? Or, is it the case that they are better ada…
/r/MensRights14/07/24 10:03 PM
1

Don't do all the work to please women with no return. Don't crawl behind women to get their attention. Approach women you are interested in for your own benefit. Walk away if it stops being to your benefit. If she rejects you then it's no longer to your benefit to stay so leave. Once you rise to the idea, having the expectation to approaching is actually the better position to be. You engage with women on your own terms and you get direct feedback from the attempt. Don't act like a slave. Your "…
/r/MensRights14/07/24 06:54 PM
3

What aliens? Are you confused about the episode? This is from 2019.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 06:30 PM
7

Remember, to women men are just tools. Their concept of men is purely utilitarian. They consider their involvement with men to be an investment and purely transactional. Therefore why wouldn't they want you to spend every waking moment "improving" yourself? That increases the value of their investment. If she can henpeck you into side gigs then that's like increasing her passive income (you). They don't want you to operate at a comfortable pace, they want to push it to redline to extract more ou…
/r/MensRights13/07/24 02:58 AM
102

Then the notion came up of, he should have a Batcave — but let’s be honest, the Batcave would be a sex dungeon. Like, even the real Batcave is just this side of being a sex dungeon. I think in psychology they call this.... "projection".
/r/MensRights13/07/24 02:51 AM
2

How do women manipulate men into anything. Silent treatment. Gaslighting. Shame and guilt. Also, don't count on a prenup actually being honored. Judges toss them all the time. You better look up what the legal and social climate is where you live, because prenup is often not worth the paper it's written on.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 11:48 PM
34

Damn this article from the BBC is like a blast from the past. They called his speech "dangerous". Haven't seen them trot that one out in a while. Still holding out for 'subversive'. Reference to global gender pay gap as big evidence of anything like the entire conceptual framework hasn't been debunked into oblivion. Found a small handful of individual tweets on Twitter and pretending it's the sentiment of the majority of people. Weasel words. Weasel words everywhere. Made up statistics dropped i…
/r/MensRights10/07/24 11:37 PM
26

Start with 50% men and 50% women. Start with all jobs. Remove all trades. Remove everything dangerous. Remove everything that requires social isolation. Remove transport. All of those are men. You have to fit all 50% of women into white collar jobs. Schools now designed for girls, more scholarships for women, affirmative action programs for women in academia, and affirmative action programs for women in corporate America. ESG investment tied to programs that advance the interests of women. Inves…
/r/MensRights10/07/24 11:22 PM
1

I wouldn't say it has anything to do with being unusual necessarily. It just means "Of the set of 200 people who were killed, some are women and some are children". The highlighting of women and children by the writer/editor implies that importance of some kind is being placed on that fact. It could be because it's unusual, or it could just be because people will click and engage more if they see women or children were affected.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 07:50 PM
5

Don't be silly, men are never considered fully human. If they have nothing to offer they are beneath contempt and not considered at all. Invisible. If they have something to offer then they become 'visible' to the extent that someone has wet their lips at the thought of exploiting them for what they have to offer, but that isn't the same as thinking of them as human beings. The very fact that men may only be considered 'fully human' if they have something to offer, disproves the notion hat they …
/r/MensRights10/07/24 07:42 PM
5

They get offended in the most performative and ways conversationally, but rage and demand to receive female privilege in the real world and complain bitterly when they don't. "Have your cake and eat it too"
/r/MensRights10/07/24 07:35 PM
9

Why do we have articles about women's alarming suicide numbers when men commit it at 4x the rate? Why do we get articles raising the alarm about how "1 in 4 homeless people are now women" while completely ignoring and sidestepping the obvious: That 3 in 4 are men. Why was the media completely silent as hundreds of boys were abducted by Boko Haram and then rang loudly from the mountain when they took a dozen girls? Why are they silent still about the documented huge amount of boys sexually abused…
/r/MensRights10/07/24 04:52 PM
34

It sounds conspiratorial but you are absolutely right that men are being separated methodically. Most younger men today can't even see it because they were born into it. Many men from all communities used to belong to fraternal groups and would engage in community service and charitable work as well as providing a safe space for men. Sadly, these organizations have been systematically attacked in the culture. Many of these groups were forced to become co-ed while others are simply gone. Today ve…
/r/MensRights10/07/24 04:26 AM
21

Unfortunately, the reality is far worse than the the theoretical here. Theoretically you can say it's obviously a body autonomy issue and the man should not require permission. Sadly, in the reality is that society sees men as subhuman and subordinate to women. Accordingly, doctors and health systems try to force counselling on men, try to force them to get permission from partners, refuse if they aren't already married with kids etc or any reason. This is shit they'd never pull with a woman und…
/r/MensRights10/07/24 04:10 AM
74

Most women think of men in purely utilitarian terms. Men are just a machine she co-opts which provides security and burden tasks through an income and physicality. They certainly don't ascribe emotions to them. The most angry women assign a kind of bitter hate towards what they see as bad autonomous behaviors, while the more well adjusted ones don't think of men in that way at all.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 03:58 AM
23

This is the fate of the majority of fathers and they don't even know it. It's a cliché, women generally don't have children with the same guy they keep around as a utility slave.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 03:54 AM
9

Yep the American justice system.. guilty until proven innocent if you're a man.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 10:14 PM
10

Our society despises men and worships women. AI is trained on organic data that reflects this tendency, and beyond that companies have additional supervised and unsupervised training that obviously reflects corporate America's absolute buy-in to feminist dogma and total hatred of men. Go argue with GPT et al about anything that remotely intersects with feminist dogma and you'll find the AI gets very defensive very quick, will outright attack or dismiss you, and starts spouting the approved phras…
/r/MensRights09/07/24 10:09 PM
9

Nature also rolls the dice with men more than women. You can break down almost anything by gender and men are overrepresented at the extremes of the bell curve even in things that are generally considered gender neutral. That means that there is almost certainly a man at the extreme fringe of ambition, of innovation, of risk taking, of intelligence.. hyper-focused in one specific area or another. Fortunately, it only takes one such man to change the world for everyone.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 10:02 PM
31

Which is so deeply ironic because they've won immensely. Every single thing they have and do every day that isn't living in a cave was provided by men.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 09:55 PM
17

Funny thing is that it is a "Guest Post" the author appears to be Robert Underhill.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 09:53 PM
23

I have no problem with individual women or men wishing to see a professional of their own gender based on personal experiences, and obviously I would hope that everyone is treated with dignity regardless of gender. But having a 'culture' of women refusing to be treated by men and all facilities everywhere being expected to honor this is something else: A kind of general bigotry in regards to men. Men who are every bit as professional, objective, and well trained as their female counterparts. In …
/r/MensRights09/07/24 09:52 PM
2

Wow, this is really notable. I see embittered women and using this study to bash men all the time still on social media.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 04:35 PM
3

No. It's evolutionary psychology. Women, cross culturally, proven in study after study, have an incredible in-group bias. They literally have a giant blind spot. All women everywhere are far more likely to overlook the shortcomings of women, automatically support women, have implicit biases in favor of women, and fail to police women.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 07:11 PM
1

The movie only made assumptions and claims that mainstream culture has been teaching most people since they were born. It takes patriarchy, male oppression, that women are somehow oppressed, that women are somehow not equal etc for granted. Of course, most media takes it for granted; most things just aren't on the nose about it. Unfortunately, when you are born and raised in a religion it usually takes some traumatic event to lose it or question it. Outside of that I just found the narrative of …
/r/MensRights07/07/24 07:06 PM
5

Your very close friend is human garbage. I think less of you for having been friends with her.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 08:36 PM
3

The goal was never to present an argument or seriously discuss anything. It was always a weapon for miserable people to bully and harass you and to have power over you. The very point is to provoke your reasoned response so they can target you with malicious rhetoric. They know you'll be emotionally susceptible to bullying of this kind because you were affected enough to take the bait in the first place. When you spend your time and energy and emotions thinking of rational and logical arguments …
/r/MensRights06/07/24 08:27 PM
9

Not only did she engage in a send nudes but she received them too. Holy shit.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 08:07 PM
14

Hypergamy. Women tend to want to date and marry at or higher than their current socioeconomic status. It's basic biology and evolutionary psychology. Some women are fine being the primary breadwinner - but not many. Meanwhile schools were redesigned for the success of girls, there are far more scholarships for women entering post secondary schools, where women now dominate men in terms of numbers. Schooling is highly correlated with earning potential so in many places women are not out earning m…
/r/MensRights06/07/24 08:04 PM
5

You said women would be shunned and ostracized for speaking up in your society. That is true for men here to a degree. If you speak up about this then you run the risk of being shunned by friends, cast out by family, losing your job, having a difficult time finding a job, your industry could close to you leaving your career in ruins. In some western countries men can be dragged before a court/human rights tribunal and forced to pay fines or be put ona watch list for speaking up. Of course, men d…
/r/MensRights06/07/24 07:55 PM
26

Yeap. Terfs literally exist entirely because their hatred of men is so great it can not abide trans women. You won't find a single terf that has anything at all to say about trans men, whom they are indifferent to.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 11:36 PM
13

The goal of their rhetoric is to coerce silence and tragically they've succeeded. As they have been throughout all of history, women are backed by dominant power structures. That means that being 'incelly' has very real consequences. You can get banned from spaces. You can lose your job.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 11:34 PM
3

Someone has to man the consoles on ships while men are out in the field.
/r/MensRights21/06/24 05:02 AM
-1

I've said the same thing on many occasions and always get downvoted to oblivion too. I have no idea why people here prefer "Everyone should be forced into war" vs "No one should be forced into war". I think Americans have been propagandized into thinking it's a required or needed thing. Someone called this a Nirvana fallacy and another said it was a necessary evil and brought up Russia an Ukraine. This is despite our own country not having forced service like other countries, and despite other c…
/r/MensRights21/06/24 04:28 AM
2

I hope you’re right. Something has to change. My nightmare scenario is that the current system eases up just enough to funnel men into social programs that brainwash them again in the name of social good even though the programs are based on hate (like APA policies when dealing with men etc)
/r/MensRights15/06/24 03:46 PM
1

Well we’ve been trying. I’ve looped myself into Mens Rights content since 2010 and every time I’ve seen a grievance narrative strategy employed it’s been met with overwhelming rage and vitriol and counter narratives that labelled MRAs as misogynistic. Even today, with evidence no one can ignore and 15 years of men advocating for themselves, men suffering is just a punchline to the general public who have been propagandized with feminist rhetoric. The one success I really see is that we provide a…
/r/MensRights15/06/24 03:41 PM
5

She has a good head on her shoulders, but doesn't have a damn clue how the world actually works. Tell me when she stops approaching these discussions assuming feminist historical narratives are actually real or happened.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 06:22 AM
5

Protip: The vast majority don't want to avoid men. They desperately want a man. They simply have nothing to offer, don't know where to start, believe they are owed more than they can get in the dating market, or the hatred they've built up is too toxic for a man to stay. Have you ever noticed how much feminists hate rants have an extreme 'bitter' edge. This is why. Femcels who are extremely bitter they couldn't snag the 10/10 doctor/lawyer and project hate onto men are an entirely different crea…
/r/MensRights15/06/24 06:01 AM
11

All this gender ideology based on power structures and identity has one end: To dominate. But you can't dominate someone who refuses to play. In this way, walking away is the biggest slight of them all.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 05:56 AM
4

Context matters. Incel is rarely if ever used to mean "involuntarily celibrate". 99.9% of it's usage today is just a general slur thrown at men. People online will throw around 'incel', 'red pill', 'mgtow', 'mensrights' etc all as smears. Very few who use these for their agendas or as smears actually ever knew what these groups are (or were) or what they believed.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 05:54 AM
5

Men aren't going to get way they want through grievance narratives. Feminist strategy is based on the fact that both women and men are biologically compelled to solve women's problems. No such programming exists in favor of men. Men have traditionally had to fight (using force) for their rights. Only women are given whatever they want just for asking.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 05:48 AM
5

No, you're obviously not wrong. Rape of women has always been considered a terrible crime. Sexual assault of any kind against women hasn't been treated as a joke in media for decades. Except if the joke is poking fun at 'old timey beliefs' or some other satire. Sexual assault of men is played for jokes in contemporary shows and movies all the time. In culture, prison rape is malevolently delighted in conceptually all the time. Many women online have been radicalized over the last 10-15 years. Li…
/r/MensRights15/06/24 05:41 AM
6

Here's how it works. You cook up a little statistic like... "The vast majority of assaults are done by men" That is true. By the numbers. (Of course, women barely ever get prosecuted for anything, and if they hit a man the man is more likely to get arrested, and if a man tries to report assault by a women he is likely to be laughed at by the police, but I digress.) However, according to my googling less than 1% of the male population was found guilty of assault last year. So, while it's "true" t…
/r/MensRights15/06/24 05:29 AM
21

I read the whole article and it basically is just political propaganda? It pretends to be about the military but it actually just snipes at 'right wing' and 'far right' and 'men are stupid' over and over again. To be honest, it actually says very little about the military. It's like an propaganda piece from a left wing outlet except with a military flavor.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 05:17 AM
15

Sure. Let's sign up. Will I die in Ukraine fighting a war so weapons manufacturers and international bankers can line their pockets? Maybe somewhere in the pacific because traditionally US companies chose to outsource chip manufacturing rather than invest in US capacity. Maybe in Israel! Which of these is actually me defending America - a country that openly hates and despises me and men?
/r/MensRights15/06/24 05:07 AM
38

The "crisis" can only be talked about in hushed tones. Any reputable academic or journalist who even talks about it is attacked by their peers and the public. There will not be one red cent spent by public funds or given any charity that tries to deal with it. This despite it being, in black and white, on paper, the biggest crisis of any 'social identity'. They know, intellectually, that men are being brutally oppressed - yet ideologically they despise and hate men and work their hatred into pub…
/r/MensRights15/06/24 05:02 AM
84

Bingo. Men sacrifice everything to protect what we love. But we live in a society that actively hates us. Hate that is expressed by our leaders, hate that is deeply encoded in all our public institutions, and hate that is mainstreamed by media. Who would fight to protect that?
/r/MensRights15/06/24 04:57 AM
27

Can't be. I watched the ads. They were about girls and women. I think one had two moms for some reason.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 04:53 AM
1

Whenever the interests and men and women collide, society favors women. Once men are subjugated enough that women having more money in marriage becomes the norm they'll likely change the law or change how they enforce it.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 03:26 AM
1

Thought experiment: Imagine everything that they claim about men is actually projection.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 09:33 PM
3

Look up 'sperm jacking' instead of stealthing for information. That is what she essentially tried to do and you'll probably find more useful information around it. Your mileage may vary as society despises men. If you can afford it or have one I'd recommend consulting a lawyer who knows the law where you live. You need to make sure you don't make any moves with records and police that could be used against you in the future. For example, she could get pregnant by some other guy, do this to you a…
/r/MensRights27/05/24 05:18 AM
7

There is nothing inherently wrong with porn. Porn is just an indulgence like rich food, social media, gaming, gambling, etc. Done in moderation it's fine but done excessively can have some negative side effects. Just like anything it can become addictive if it's used as a coping mechanism. The reason porn is demonized is: 1. Women see it as as reducing their power over men 2. It is seen as an activity men primarily indulge in and therefore it gets demonized by default
/r/MensRights27/05/24 05:07 AM
12

You don't need bad consequences even. If men are just into something women aren't generally into then it's also bad by default.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 04:52 AM
8

They want to make tools of men. Any free spaceon the board a man might move to has to be removed. The only option they will allow for men will be to operate on their turf under their rules.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 10:16 PM
1

Whoever said women are not competitive with each other and what does that have to do with anything I said or the studies mentioned? The studies on bias tested automatic low level cognitive bias via things like association tests. Benevolent sexism operates on a much higher conceptual framework than implicit bias - like protective paternalism "I should carry this, hold this, protect her because women are not strong". or "Women are nurturing so we should only make baby doll toys for girls" i.e. The…
/r/MensRights05/05/24 04:49 PM
3

It isn’t what I alone believe, it’s what countless studies have shown and proven as accepted fact in social sciences. Both men and women have a more favourable view of women than men, and women’s favourable views are 4.5x higher than mens. Men have no such bias for men. “Majority of comments” - You’ve subjected yourself to a small space particularly critical of women and you have developed an opinion based on that small space which isn’t applicable generally. That is just an echo chamber and ava…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 11:15 PM
12

Scares his little sister to the point she's afraid to be around him. Beats his mom. Sounds like he's the "misogynist". Call him out.Your nephew is a spoiled loser. I would say he needs therapy but that might just feed into his main character, "zuko", outsider narrative. I don't have answers... if I were you I'd back off the topic of women and focus more on topics that are likely to help him (independence, goals, dreams, humility, etc). Then I'd just play and be there for him. However, don't lose…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 03:32 PM
2

The effect is cross cultural and has persisted over time regardless of the state of "womens rights" any one region. This makes it more likely an artifact of evolutionary biology. Also, in my opinion, 4.5x is simply too extreme a bias to be uniformly distributed across a population simply as a result of culture alone.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 03:23 PM
171

Particularly the in-group bias. While both men and women have generally more favorable views of women, women's bias in favor of women was 4.5x as much as the men. Men have no in-group bias. 4.5x. 450%. It's hard to really imagine that level of irrationality for men because we simply don't have that bias. Women will always side with women. Everything they've ever said about patriarchy, oppression, etc was all projection. It's just what they'd do if they had the chance.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 09:40 PM
32

It was never about equality. It was about power and making things easier for themselves. Your masculinity is useful to women, so they will have their cake and eat it too. They charge right through hypocrisy while batting an eye.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 09:35 PM
3

Reddit? It's the duality of the world and extends far beyond porn.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 09:31 PM
1

It got me thinking. We hear so much about the 'radicalization of men online'. There is some of that but in little isolated pockets. The truth is that it's the other way around: The internet has radicalized most women. This bear question is only the latest example. Every day men are subjected to bigotry and hate online from radicalized women whose claims have no basis in fact and have been long disproven. Women have a number of cognitive biases which make them more susceptible to filter bubbles a…
/r/MensRights03/05/24 04:48 AM
3

What gets me is they have these little disconnected islands of caring. None of it is integrated or consistent. If the issue in one of their islands their opinion, arguments, and even their emotional responses seem preprogrammed. If it's the exact same thing but isn't one of their little islands they are neutral to the point of catatonia and think around the thing.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 12:35 AM
36

In 2011. Articles started popping up here and there that were clearly bitter, hateful, and misandrist. The writers said they were feminists. I thought if they are so angry there must be a reason. So I dove into study. I read tons of feminist literature, poured over studies quoted by feminists, studied their version of history. I found the literature self contradictory, hypocritical, and irrational. The studies were cooked: cherry picked and misinterpreted. The history far more complex than their…
/r/MensRights01/05/24 12:28 AM
13

Evolutionary psychology. We (both men and women) are biologically programmed to respond to women’s grievance. Feminism borrows lots of clever tricks from other political ideologies which give it a lot of utility but ultimately it owes its great success to that evolutionary fact more than any other. That is why men can never follow a feminist template in order to achieve their goals. No one gives a shit if men complain.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 03:51 AM
10

Were you expecting reason and accountability?
/r/MensRights28/04/24 03:41 AM
3

Such is the absurdity that arises when a low iq world view based on identity politics clashes with the real world. It's too bad these people are so dumb they don't realise they are being made into tools for the cost of a few goodies and a pat on the head.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 04:47 PM
1

1960s. That is when the ideological underpinnings of modern feminist were penned. That's when they adopted a structure based on identity politics and power dynamics that defined other horrific 20th century ideologies. Once that happened it became about acquiring power and justifying that acquisition. There is no compromise or equality possible when this is the goal because all outgroups become enemies or tools. There is a lot more depth, and also evolutionary reasons why this approach works so w…
/r/MensRights20/04/24 04:45 PM
12

"Porn addict" boyfriend = Indulges in porn at all. Porn addiction is real, but women will call you an addict like porn is heroin and they caught you with the needle.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 04:10 PM
4

It's not just feeling inadequate. Sexuality is women's power - they use sex to control men and get what they want. They covet it. That's the real reason they have visceral negative attitudes towards porn, sex work, and traditionally attack each other in communities for promiscuity. They don't want their innate tool to be devalued. Really, their entire sense of ethics is like that. What disadvantages them is bad and what advantages them is the good.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 04:06 PM
2

The in-group bias is always the case regardless whether the husband is wrong or not. It’s just reality and the reason why she went to a group of women to justify her feelings. That doesn’t mean her feeling is wrong. I don’t know the story in this case and whether the husband is right or wrong, but remember you are basing your judgement on a completely one sided story being told by someone looking to justify their position and actions.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 05:50 PM
2

Women have a massive in-group bias proven in countless studies. Women go to other women when they are looking for validation and they expect to get it no matter how insane their behaviour is and they usually do.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 04:51 PM
3

Focus on eating well, sleeping well, drinking lots of water, and getting exercise. Be mindful of how things affect you and cut the daily habit of consuming content that makes you feel angry or powerless. Focus your daily activities on things you can control that have a direct impact on your life, your family, friends, or local community. Take time to think about the things in life you can be grateful for and make an attempt to revisit those things whenever you feel your thinking slipping into a …
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:01 PM
10

Male teachers have been pushed out of the field almost entirely. Multiple studies show female teachers treat male students more harshly than female students leading to worse outcomes. Male teachers have been pushed out of the field almost entirely. This means young boys have no male role models within the school. Studies show recess is required for generally more energetic boys to burn off energy and perform at their best in the class room but recess has been continually whittled away at over ti…
/r/MensRights01/04/24 06:46 PM
3

There's a lot of fear mongering about young men becoming radicalized online when the truth is that it's young women who have become completely radicalized by the internet. Some men hate women and most men disagree. Most women hate men and most women agree. Those men have discussions in the dark corners of the internet, while misandry is the status quo everywhere from academic papers, to the news, to corporations, to large social media channels. Misogyny will get you banned from social media site…
/r/MensRights01/04/24 06:32 PM
2

I define toxic masculinity as reinterpretation gender neutral behaviors and trauma responses as a set of false imaginary male caricatures designed to smear men everywhere with the original sin of being a man. The shame and guilty from this sin can then be used to control and manipulate men. The goal of which is ultimately political - to cast conservative beliefs as harmful and evil in relation to progressive belief systems. If you are suffering and abuse substances as a result? You aren't suffer…
/r/MensRights01/04/24 06:30 PM
2

When women express grievance society tries to give them what they want. When men express grievance they are pushed out of the group as not being useful. This is hardwired into our genes and is human nature. No one is ever going to give affirmative action to men for being men. Even if all men were dying in gutters with people stamping boots on their faces, society will frame it as a problem because women are suffering because those men are not producing enough.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 06:17 PM
3

Are they literally saying that women can't compete? No problem, if the theory is sound then I'm sure some enterprising person will set up a law firm or finance business based on anti-competitive ideologies and sweep the competition. Men are resource gatherers. They are going to work longer and harder for extra pay and bonuses. Usually and most often for the benefit of women. Women just double dip.. they demand easier jobs and better pay then men, then also demand male partners that provide resou…
/r/MensRights01/04/24 06:14 PM
2

Women make up the majority of students so now it's time to try to get free shit. No matter what women do, no matter where they are, they will push for free shit.. and society will work hard to give it to them.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 06:05 PM
7

Isn't that basically always the story? Everywhere, with everything female related?
/r/MensRights01/04/24 06:03 PM
3

It varies by state, but generally in the United States the state decides if you pay child support and they will extract their pound of flesh. In some cases this can happen even if you aren't the bio dad but you just hung around long enough while taking on a paternal role. It's also the last debtors prison - if you can't pay they will put you behind bars.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:56 PM
5

If women were judged by the standards men are judged in relationships then I think women in 99% of relationships would be considered abusive and toxic. Most men in marriages live lives of quiet desperation accepting that their subjugation and relegation to being tools to fulfill the needs of others is just the cost for being able to have children.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:50 PM
7

There is no more axiom more sacred to all sects of feminism everywhere than 'patriarchy'. Man hating is the very beating heart of the movement. Feminism isn't women striving forward brilliantly into the future as a actualized and independent entity. It's a movement based on identity politics and social warfare. It's always been obsessed with men and women's relation to them.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:46 PM
2

Of course. When have you ever heard someone say "A real man" outside the context of trying to manipulate someone into acting a certain way or doing something? It's just a trick. They set up an ideal identity and place it in relation to you and the distance between you and the ideal they created defines the direction they want you to move to suit their own agenda. Here's the truth: If you are a man and someone else's definition of a man does not include you then it's the definition that is wrong …
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:40 PM
2

It's because women derive their power in society from sex. Sex is a tool for women to control others and get what they want. When people say "prostitution is the oldest industry in the world" they aren't referring to male prostitutes. Everyone has heard stories of how 'sex stopped once we got married/she got what she wanted'. Everyone who has ever been a relationship has seen how women will use sex to manage the relationship. Of course, some men also use sex tactically but often is an end unto i…
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:34 PM
22

I think it definitely started out that way, but it kinda falls apart in the third act and gets washed out with the pinocchio Barbie becoming a real girl stuff.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:16 PM
96

To me it felt like a kind of a stylistic/fashionable mish mash of random women circle jerk internet memes. Maybe you could say it had a general 'theme' but I honestly don't think it had anything of substance to say.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:12 PM
3

Never forget, women who hate men generally agree with the behaviour of most women. Men who hate women find no solace in the behaviour of most men. There will always be a huge amount of women who are gutted their lives are so easy but they aren’t pretty enough to get the millionaire. The real problem is that almost all women think of men as disposable tools to secure resources and free labour, and the public systems that support their position.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 09:21 PM
9

Feminism is a factory that produces and justifies hatred of men.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 09:08 PM
3

Yes. For exactly the reasons you stated. Feminism is a political ideology with a central dogma that is common to all denominations. They put men and women into two categories, and then scapegoat the male category as being more powerful and oppressive. This is a common tactic used to spurn the target group (women here) to advocacy/political action. The moment the movement scapegoated men for political expediency it became a hate based movement. The engine of the movement is fed on the flames of m…
/r/MensRights17/03/24 09:04 PM
32

Never forget that all the complaining, all the gaslighting, all the narratives that women spin about patriarchy are projection. The more power women get the more they use it to privileges themselves and subjugate men. The more power they get the more we'll see the fictional oppressive patriarchy made manifest as real for the first time and used as their tool.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 05:12 PM
7

Society is designed to be kind to women. Every institution is designed for the benefit of women or goes easier on women. The very species is designed to be kind to women at a biological level. I have no idea how anyone can support the position that women don't live life on easy mode in the west.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 05:09 PM
3

That article is ten years old. I think everyone knows now that the premise makes literally no sense. It's just another boring attack on stay-at-home mothers and the 'nuclear family' in a long line of such attacks reaching back decades. Back here in 2024, a vanishingly small amount of families can afford to have full time stay at home mothers anyway. Especially so if she has already spent years investing an education where she can earn significant income for the family.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 05:01 PM
14

Studies and social experiments have shown time and time again that all else being equal, women and men generally gravitate towards different kinds of jobs due to different interests. For women, engineering ain't one of them. The more equal than equal western society makes women the less likely they will become engineers.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 04:53 PM
10

Did you expect consequences or accountability?
/r/MensRights17/03/24 04:46 PM
1

Typical female supremacist psychology. These hypergamous women look upward and see a small minority men in power that choose to wage war, while ignoring the absolute millions of men that die as fodder for their ambitions. Men who die for ideas like family, daughters, wives, and home. Not only are they immensely callous in their own biases, but they are also, of course, factually wrong. Queen Elizabeth I, Catherine the Great, Queen Isabella I, Empress Dowager Cixi, Maria Theresa, Ranavalona I, Ta…
/r/MensRights09/03/24 03:36 AM
6

School has been redesigned for girls success. There are more scholarships for women. Despite vastly outnumbering men in number, universities have easier admittance and special programs for women. Many industries give women preferential treatment in order to meet gender quotas. Women out-earn men until their 30s when they decide to make their careers less of a priority. All the while these female supremacist groups of women work brazenly to advance the cause of women. Despite all this privilege a…
/r/MensRights09/03/24 03:25 AM
20

You are assuming that male suicide wasn't their goal.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 12:52 AM
6

The fact that anyone ever thought "counter terrorism" when thinking about incels just shows how brutal, uncaring, savage, and oppressive society is towards men.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 12:49 AM
3

And, as a corollary, men must always be incapable of being one.
/r/MensRights03/03/24 07:14 PM
6

All those subreddits. If you're a man you're the bad guy, and if you're a woman then you're good. If you're a woman and you're clearly and obviously wrong they'll start inventing stories about your childhood, or experiences, or assuming she's being tricked and the man is more evil than she is admitting etc. Of course, it isn't just those subreddits - all of western society is like this. Interestingly.. because of the bias, men have stopped participating to the point where the majority of posters…
/r/MensRights03/03/24 07:11 PM
9

Cute fantasy but society isn't structured that way anymore. Divorce can be had at her whim, and she will use the state to leave you poor, destitute, and without access to your children, and cut off from friend groups. Your sense of identity as a man whose project is leading and growing a family over generations is going to crumble pretty fast when you're sitting in in your new one bedroom apartment, in silence, alone in the dark.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 03:56 PM
14

"Men never talk about their emotions, this is toxic" or "Men force me to do emotional labor by opening up about their emotions, this is toxic.". If it doesn't serve them then it's toxic.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 03:51 PM
6

He won the chance to continue to use a 5 year old laptop while buying her expensive gifts for the rest of his life. I'm sorry your cousin is low quality and quite basic. I guess he's signaled he'll give every last scrap to her and the children. Your cousin has taken ownership of a beast of burden, not someone she is attracted to or cares about.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 03:50 PM
5

A 27-year-old Perth woman has avoided jail time after she pleaded guilty to assaulting and choking her seven-month-old baby. I mean. Given that is the very first line, is discussion even required at this point?
/r/MensRights28/02/24 03:29 PM
4

Toxic empathy. They create systems of codependence in both their personal lives and at a societal level. Same strategy for the same reason. Everyone champions equality today - they simply have different beliefs on what exactly that means and how it can be achieved. Nice spin though.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 03:27 PM
3

Men are simply tools for women. Beasts of burden which are cast aside if they break down or can't be serviced. I believe it is biological but there is a reasonable cultural explanation. They are told their entire lives that they are oppressed and that justifies a very self serving mentality. Maybe it's both.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 03:23 PM
14

Can you imagine if female babies were put through an unnecessary surgery to remove parts that were then turned into unnecessary products for men to consume? This one thing alone is like the worst feminist nightmare narrative except actually real, and of course, gender reversed.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 04:17 AM
2

You are assuming there is a rational framework. There isn't. What you are doing is you're mistaking the gun for the gunman. You're examining the gun in great detail in hopes of deducing the motives of the person who fired it. Political ideologies like feminism are tools. They describe a framework that allows unscrupulous individuals to exploit the innate biases within human evolutionary psychology to their own ends. Here's how it works. First, divide people up into separate groups making sure to…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 06:16 PM
7

Also ironic because - according to real data and not feelings - it's actually more dangerous to walk alone at night if you are a man. Check this out: Although fear of crime is a concern for people of all genders, studies consistently find that women around the world tend to have much higher levels of fear of crime than men, despite the fact that in many places, and for most offenses, men's actual victimization rates are higher. [...] Most women are aware of the pervasive cultural view that women…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 05:38 PM
3

I mean, there is a pretty good explanation already. We're products of evolution with a biological imperative to procreate. When selecting a mate women want security. They practice hypergamy and look for men that have power, wealth, respect or whatever status currency is valuable within the context of the social group. Men want to be selected as mates, therefore men take on more risk and sacrifice more to make more money - which is the dominant social status indicator in our society. Of course, m…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 05:29 PM
4

Exactly. For ideologies that view the world in terms of power structures there can be only one goal - the will to power.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 05:13 PM
3

Sad thing is, all things considered it makes sense to have a daughter preference in the west. Girls and women simply live life on an easier difficulty setting compared to males. School designed for your success, more scholarships, affirmative action programs in your favor for academia and corporations regardless of gender divide. Endless women centered programs in give you a leg up. Welfare state exists for your benefit and cares about housing and helping you. Reduced or no sentence for crimes m…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 04:51 PM
5

The tragic thing about "missing women and girls" stories in the west is that men from the same demographics are often MORE missing/murdered in stark black and white - but that isn't a story anyone cares about.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 04:43 PM
14

The gym is not your porn studio.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 06:32 PM
6

I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them. Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig. Andrea Dworkin Since marriage [with a man] constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women’s movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be w…
/r/MensRights21/02/24 08:18 PM
3

I mean the most basic and sacred tenant of all sects of Feminism is patriarchy. The conceptual framework that divides men and women into two identity groups and tells women that the male group is powerful and uses that power to oppress them. Of course it's anti-male. Men are literally scapegoated and cast as the villain in their narrative.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 08:02 PM
2

I mean this is true in all societies everywhere and always has been. It's been common knowledge in Britain for a long time as well. I remember watching Line of Duty back in 2012 and that season had elements of both the criminal exploitation of boys as well "cuckooing" as mentioned in the article. Still, nice of them to pull the wool from their eyes briefly. I suspect the political and bureaucratic will to take action to help boys is just slightly above zero. Perhaps it'll be used to drum up mone…
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:27 AM
1

I think almost all MRAs are probably here because something hurt them them to some degree. MensRights is not accepted in the mainstream culture and feminists have generally attacked MRAs. Most people will just go along with the prevailing societal narratives unless they have a reason not to. Therefore most people usually have some reason for taking a stand against those narratives. Investing themselves and their time and energy. Luckily for me, there was no single very traumatic event. Instead i…
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:16 AM
5

You will not change human nature. No force on earth has succeeded, and each fails in direct proportion to the effort they put into the attempt. Chads will chad and those numbers are only going to go up the longer we stay on this course. Most men aren't going to forgo sex and dating/marriage are increasingly losing games. I see simping increasing as well but only to a plateau. A kind of worship of femininity is built into our genes, and as long as we devalue and sideline boys, men who have no con…
/r/MensRights12/02/24 02:47 AM
8

Are they really radicals when their ideology is mainstream culture? I mean, it's taught in grade school. It's implicitly part of television and in the movies. It's corporate and government policy. Feminism and it's narratives are the orthodoxy.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 02:36 AM
2

Women view men the way a man might view a car. It needs to function first and foremost, beyond that it's nice to get the luxury features. A man who doesn't perform when it comes to acquiring resources, as a source of labor, or as a means for socioeconomic advancement is like owning a car that is broken down. Her question is then is it worth trying to fix it one or just get a new one. When you're broken there won't be any compassion. Just as a car is stripped for parts, she'll try to extract ever…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 08:32 PM
3

It's just propaganda. It's one of their favorite tricks. Even though the number of men who would hurt a woman based on rejection is vanishingly tiny to the point of insignificance, they will take something like "of the % of people who hurt someone as a result of rejection broken down it by gender", see men have a higher %, and then use that to smear all men. The goal is create a general state of fear and distrust towards men while also creating a sense of insecurity and shame within men. They do…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 08:17 PM
3

Women want to have their cake and eat it too. They can't decide whether they want to live in 2024 or 1954. They look to the past and see all the privileges they had. Privileges based on societal roles they no longer fulfill in a society where they no longer make sense. The problem is that the entire system has been redesigned for the success, independence, and ease of girls and women. As a result boys now do worse in schools, drop out at higher rates in high school, apply for college less and wh…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 07:37 PM
72

It makes sense. Society bends over backward for women. Takes their every little grievance seriously. All public institutions serve them. The government gives them whatever they want. Of course you have become more liberal when the social contract puts you and your desires above all other concerns.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:49 AM
16

Why would she? She would be sabotaging her own business
/r/MensRights04/02/24 05:06 PM
15

The sub is for men - not against women. The enemy is not and has never been women, but instead that "thing" that has attacked and ostracized you for not accepting unfair and infantilizing benefits and for not condemning men as the enemy. You yourself can attest to how all encompassing that "thing" has become. Welcome. Some here are justifiably angry and may object, but the majority welcome support from across the aisle.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 09:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter