TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

msennello Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by msennello on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

They call everything they don't like "vIoLeNcE". She's not mad, she's just retarded and evil.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 01:02 AM
2

"When I complained to my boss today, she (most of my management is female)" In the words of Jamie Hyneman, "Well there's your problem!"
/r/MensRights07/08/23 02:03 AM
1

I'm sure you've had the "old adage" said to your face: Women in the front, men in the back.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 02:01 AM
2

Screw you. I used my real name and real locations for a reason. I could probably dig up paystubs if it wasn't painfully obvious a demand like that would be coming in bad faith. I carry around my old EBT card (foodstamps) in my wallet right now as a reminder of those times. I challenge you to go to Savannah, GA right now and fill out an application with the City for any job. I challenge you to do what I did with the 11 Krogers in the greater Savannah area. This is real, and screw you for being th…
/r/MensRights09/01/23 10:02 PM
1

100% real. I used my real name for a reason, and I used easily-identifiable real locations for a reason as well, and that's because it's something you can verify. I could probably even provide paystubs if you guys are going to be that purposely obtuse.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 10:00 PM
29

Here's what worked for me when I was genuinely starving and could not for the life of me get a job, so I applied to the local Kroger as a last-ditch hope: Lie about your name. Make sure it's generic enough and believable enough to sound "black". For example, my name is Michael Sennello. The last name is obviously not a "black" name, so I went with my middle name: "Taylor". What do you think of when you hear the name "Michael Taylor"? Is it a DB in the NFL, whose skin is as dark as Wesley Snipes?…
/r/MensRights09/01/23 02:58 AM
5

"when going out with your female friends" I mean.....
/r/MensRights03/01/23 02:48 PM
9

The preview explicitly said "Don't watch this show" and told me to F myself to boot, so I was happy to oblige and not watch the show. Ask and you shall receive, Hollywoke.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 05:11 AM
1

Find a way to insert a dismissive "that's gay" in-conversation. "The owner of the bar I work at is also the Mayor, so we'll never get [insert reasonable policy change] at the bar." "Oh man, that's gay. Is it worth the tips?" If she freaks out, bail. It will be painfully obvious if she GAF about what you just said. Feminists won't be able to not react to something like this.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 04:11 AM
14

The "Talk" section is even wilder. It's just a non-stop circular logic of "we ignore the source if it doesn't fit the pre-established narrative". And this is why anyone who cites Wikipedia is, themselves, a joke. ​ As a complete aside, I highly recommend everyone check out the "Talk" section on Fascism, particularly in reference to it being a "right-wing" ideology.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 03:36 AM
1

It's a Motte and Bailey used to cover for the fact that feminism long ago became open and wildly extreme misandry.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:05 AM
25

To anyone who's ever tried to get into the restaurant industry: "Women in the front, men in the back."
/r/MensRights28/09/22 02:20 AM
1

One word: phishing. This isn't a "she", it's a bot, and you fell for it. Just delete and block.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 03:58 PM
32

So it's overtly sexist, and they purposely spent all their time and energy on making sure it was overtly sexist, which meant they spent zero time and energy on all the things that make a show good, and, exactly as predicted, it sucks. Is that what you're telling me?
/r/MensRights22/09/22 08:36 PM
2

Don't act like what I was talking about was "people who go to war" when I was obviously talking about "people who go to therapy", and the point is so obvious it's in boldface.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 08:11 PM
11

Women in therapy: "He stopped saying he loves me before we go to bed!" Men in therapy: "My CO ordered me to shoot and kill this 9-year-old Iraqi at point blank. The crazy thing is, there was no way to tell if the kid was going to pull the cord on his jacket and blow us all up like what happened to all of my squad mates from last week."
/r/MensRights22/09/22 02:22 AM
2

If what you're talking about is abolishing the draft (rather than inserting women into it), I'm all for it. If it's really that desperate a time, pay people enough. Better yet, if it's really that desperate, people will be signing up without the need to institute the draft. This is a great way of determining, too, where the citizenry actually stand on any given military engagement. Can't get enough people to sign up for the war? Then the governed probably aren't offering consent to the war.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 04:07 AM
2

Is it possible to have a sub-subreddit? Like a "sub" of r/MRA that was r/askMRA? Honestly, if you have a sub called "r/chesslovers", you'd think if you have a question for chess lovers you could just...ask...r/chesslovers, right? I mean the only reason r/askfeminists exists is because r/feminist / r/feminism etc. are highly curated echo chambers that utterly refuse to be questioned, even in obviously innocuous good faith. So it would make sense that r/askMRA would just be redundant at best, thou…
/r/MensRights21/09/22 03:09 AM
1

Community-based schooling is what you're talking about. As in, "home-schooling" for a neighborhood/block. Step one in what you're talking about is getting kids TF out of public schools, whose design necessarily doesn't align with boys/young men (though it used to many years ago) and how they best learn material.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 06:32 AM
2

To follow-up, though, I think it's pretty obvious what's at the heart of this. She isn't "busted", but she's really "average" in the looks department, and the guys she's approaching are obviously 6'2"+ absolutely shredded athletes/male models, who probably have 11/10's approaching them non-stop already. Guarantee this woman has a completely delusional view of her own physical attractiveness, and probably a completely delusional view of herself in general. Guarantee this wouldn't be a story if sh…
/r/MensRights10/09/22 06:10 AM
1

True, and this is the most cringe-AF way to look at dating, but at least she's doing the obvious thing and making the first move. If she'd be willing to immediately get a coffee and talk about how that's just the worst approach ever, I'd be happy to have her hand me a "resume", and would gladly prefer this over the current "hope you don't get falsely accused" system.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 06:00 AM
3

In a free market: No one is being exploited. The transaction can't happen without mutual consent. In all other circumstances: Everyone is being exploited....by government. There is no way to ensure mutual consent, and, when one side abuses the consent of the other, there's no way, legally, to remedy the situation, let alone return consent to the transaction.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 12:23 AM
2

False. All parties are being taken advantage of.....by government interfering with an otherwise mutually consensual transaction when that's the case. Remember, if she drugs and robs the john, there's nothing the john can do about it, because the prostitution part is illegal. If she's using the pussy to set a trap and falsely advertise to the john, there's nothing he can do to legally remedy the con.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 12:21 AM
1

Women are female. Females have vaginas. They control the key to that vagina...and men are so motivated by sex we might as well be treated like hyenas around a stinking zebra carcass once a woman unlocks that proverbial gate. Aside from the obvious fact that all humans are their own moral agents (the more obvious response), if you want the crude, caveman, flippant, "eff you" response in kind, the answer is "Men control the gates to relationships, women control the gates to sex. Outside rape, if s…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 09:40 PM
4

"Women in the front, men in the back." If you've ever worked in food service (ESPECIALLY restaurants), you've been told this to your face. Everyone knows line-cooks, dishwashers, and bussers make, excuse the phrase, dick-shit, and everyone knows the bartenders / waitresses at even moderately successful restaurants make between $25-$30 an hour CASH (so like $40+ an hour real-world) with zero qualifications, no sweating, no vomit-inducing stenches to deal with, and a clear and direct path to manag…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 06:25 PM
16

Okay, there's a few dickheads... welcome to the internet. A "couple of comments" is not 'sliding into sexist hate oblivion' really, is it. ^ A thousand times over, THIS. Especially the "welcome to the internet" part.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 05:53 PM
18

Wholesale disagree. The men of this subreddit are understandably jaded and cynical. That doesn't make them women-haters, especially when the "hate" is almost universally directed at either bad policy or even-worse societal norms and the direction the culture is headed generally. This may not fall autistically directly under the head of "Mens' Rights", but is certainly a fair topic when the consequences of not having a Mens' Rights movement (and this subreddit) as a place to talk about these legi…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 05:50 PM
1

Get this: a world built on a principle of "Degeneracy good, no amount of degeneracy bad" will have degenerates act like degenerates. Now who in the world could have seen this coming?
/r/MensRights12/08/22 05:37 PM
1

The "rule of thumb" actually originates from the earliest days of what we would today call "civil engineering". Measuring tools and methods 800+ years ago were very simplistic/rudimentary, so getting hyper-precise measurements / building plans was a truly brutal and painstaking (and expensive) endeavor. "Rule", in this case, was a reference to a method of measuring (like a "ruler"). You could either pay for a measurement taken "by the rule", or a measurement taken as "a rule of thumb": the engin…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 05:33 PM
1

Many online dating sites have means to automatically link to the sex offender registry. The screeching from women in online dating if this ever went through would be glorious.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 05:28 PM
1

My estimation, based on divorce in the early 90s: It's extraordinarily rare for a guy to get the kids at all, and the courts are all biased wildly in favor of the woman. That means the only way a guy is going to get the kids is if some fairly extraordinary circumstances arise, like that the mother is a crack addict murderer sentenced to life in prison and dad is an award-winning nuclear physicist and goddamned Eagle Scout. Which means the comparison is between [luck of the draw] and [absolute be…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 05:39 AM
3

I mean, yeah? Wasn't that the point?
/r/MensRights12/08/22 05:34 AM
7

Here are the four steps to getting a guy if you're a girl who is "struggling": Put down the fork. Get on the treadmill. Stop being a delusional, insufferable, miserable, raging, frothing-at-the-mouth, absolute fucking cunt. Make the first move.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 05:33 AM
8

You guys remember OKTrends? It demonstrated irrefutably that women's expectations were genuinely delusional, and that whatever needed to change had to originate from them. It was raw data that could only be amassed when you have millions of users and billions of interactions to collect data from, and a massive pool of very willing volunteers. OKTrends got mothballed, then yeeted because the blue-hairs found the raw data in direct conflict with their demands...thus proving the exact point OKTrend…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 05:27 AM
6

The whole interview, if they interviewed a guy: "Oh, I'm not lonely at all, and this six-pack I work out for...yeah, that's for me. I'm 24, the women my age are all lunatics, I have a good job, 'the Hub', and two working hands; I'll be fine on my own. Cheers!"
/r/MensRights12/08/22 05:23 AM
1

"It would suck to live your life with someone you don't like." I'd hate to see you apply that logic when "someone you don't like" is "your children".
/r/MensRights06/08/22 12:26 AM
1

Get rid of divorce for "irreconcilable differences", and almost all of these problems go away. You signed away "'til death do you part", so you better have a damned good reason to get out of this contract.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 05:14 AM
1

I did my best to lay this out as simply as I could here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSzahO9E\_YA&list=PLiWvVoZuPzcJM78GbesOyc\_MAh0jXrmJH
/r/MensRights25/06/22 05:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter