mudze Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
5	The 18 year old girl who hit and killed 2 kids in a pile of leaves, then drove off and covered up the evidence will not serve any jail time. Her boyfriend on the other hand gets prison time for helping to cover up the evidence. Fuckin' oath cunt. But yes, it's a shame that the murderer is going free.	/r/MensRights	01/02/14 03:52 PM
1	When all men aren't treated like pedophiles, this is the kind of thing that can happen. Yeah, it's kind of annoying. I mean, I consider myself a pretty hardcore LGBTIQetc rights activist, but I just don't understand the You can't just assume someone's romantic/sexual/gender identity when you meet them argument that people seem to have going. Statistically most of them are going to be heterosexual, cisgendered people whose romantic identity lines up with their sexuality. It's just easier to assume that until stated otherwise.	/r/MensRights	07/08/13 03:38 PM
8	When all men aren't treated like pedophiles, this is the kind of thing that can happen. White Upper middle class Heterosexual Bisexual Cisgender A/transgendered Thin Male I'm still literally Hitler, because sexuality and gender aren't visual traits. More SJWs have assumed I was straight than regular people have, it's kinda funny when they accuse me of being homo- and trans- phobic. I mean, I could just claim that I'm transethnic and transsexual, that I'm really a poor black girl at heart, but you know. I don't lie. I stand by who I am.	/r/MensRights	07/08/13 03:27 PM
-2	Feminism: PR problem? This argument is absurd. Increasing the rights of women to match the rights of men is a method of achieving equality in unequal areas. That's just basic math. You're the kind of irrational person that makes mens' rights so hard to achieve.	/r/MensRights	01/08/13 06:34 PM
-3	Feminism: PR problem? No. It's just heading towards equality from one side. Keeping in mind I'm talking about the original definition of feminism I specified earlier, actual progress towards equal rights, not thinly veiled counter-oppression.	/r/MensRights	01/08/13 06:01 PM
-2	Feminism: PR problem? No, intelligent adults realise that organisations can have singular or narrow goals. A feminist organisation by its very definition would not be focused on mens' issues, otherwise it would be an egalitarian or anti-sexism organisation. I am perfectly fine with, and am in total support of, people working towards the rights of only one gender. I'm not about to force someone working towards ending discrimination towards African-Americans start campaigning for the rights of Hispanic-Americans, and i…	/r/MensRights	01/08/13 05:38 PM
1	Feminism: PR problem? Oh god yes, sexism is rampant. It's truly terrible. I'm actually pretty sure men can't even legally be the victim of rape in my country. Just as an aside, since I'm pretty sure we've reached agreement on this issue, I've apparently given you four upvotes in threads that aren't this one, and I'm not sure what they were for, but apparently I like you.	/r/MensRights	01/08/13 05:34 PM
1	Feminism: PR problem? advanced by non-feminist organizations Which is why I specified... scans post for quote feminism was initially focussed on equality, albeit in a narrow area I know this area is a wordplay clusterfuck as it is, but I don't believe a feminist organisation should focus on mens' issues. I certainly do think it's a problem when those organisations take away mens' rights, but that's beside the point. I liken it to my stance on the LGBTIQetc movement and my stance against the Australian government's de…	/r/MensRights	01/08/13 05:14 PM
3	Feminism: PR problem? Again I have to disagree, but for a different reason. Sexism, towards both sexes, has always existed. Progress on womens' rights is labelled feminism, which is simple enough. Progress on mens' rights is often labelled "human rights". It makes this very, very confusing, and a topic that would honestly require me to visit a few libraries, talk to a few experts -BREAK- By experts I mean psychologists and sociologists that have studied human rights and feminism, I do not mean people who have learned…	/r/MensRights	01/08/13 04:54 PM
0	Feminism: PR problem? I disagree, it was quite clear that the start of feminism was clearly in the interests of obtaining equality, which is what I was referring to. A common issue among masculinists (and all people fighting against any kind of bigotry) is to confuse a genuine, even-handed point with an attack against them purely because it has considered the benefits of both sides, or even worse used a buzzword (in this case feminist) that they rally against in a positive light. Feminism was once a good thing. Even …	/r/MensRights	01/08/13 04:08 PM
24	Feminism: PR problem? Feminism has an academia problem. The study of feminism does not study feminism, rather it studies movements that actively label themselves feminist (that would be, the first through fourth waves of feminism). This is a fairly large issue, as I'm sure most people would agree that feminism, by the simplest definition of the word used back when the movements first started out, is a fairly good thing. Equality. Fairness. That's good. Unfortunately, the study of feminism, and since that has been by …	/r/MensRights	01/08/13 03:21 PM