TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

muh-soggy-knee Archive

View 1 post and 307 comments by muh-soggy-knee on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
47

False Accusationmuh-soggy-knee/r/MensRights08/02/18 11:15 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Well you'll get across the border yes, but expect a nice hefty prosecution waiting for you when you either A: Return, or B: Come to the attention of the authorities in any other country on the continent who will immediately extradite you back.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 08:59 PM
12

You do realise I literally said that in the post you are replying to right?
/r/MensRights21/11/25 06:53 PM
52

There is something afoot with the younger folk where it seems to be "cool" to publicly and proudly let everyone know you're kinda shitty. See also: The lyrics to the vast majority of female pop music. It's like they took a look at early 2000s shitty bling 'n' B**ches rap and said "yes, that's the aesthetic, just with boobs"
/r/MensRights21/11/25 01:58 PM
3

You could have fooled me
/r/MensRights09/03/25 08:14 AM
3

Whilst I disagree with your take further down that there is no crime here; there is by virtue of the abuse of position, I actually agree that the sentencing is a little insane in all of the context. I would say that regardless of the genders involved. This is not paedophilic, outside of the context of it being teacher-student this would have been entirely consentual and probably legal though I'd have to check on the AoC in that particular state. In the UK we have people recieving sentences of le…
/r/MensRights21/05/24 07:26 AM
1

If he has an issue and doesn't expect a BJ at the same time, then that's a facet of their relationship she needs to decide if she's fine with or move on. If he still expects her to perform but won't reciprocate, that's less fine.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 06:07 AM
2

The tone I took from your post was that she was in some way unreasonable by not committing to an abortion because pregnancy would impact on your life plans. If that wasn't the intention and you don't feel that way then by all means consider my "accusation" if it can be called that; retracted. The reality is - Sex leads to pregnancy. You can mitigate it and accept the reduced risk whilst being prepared to live with the consequences, or you can be abstinent. Those are really the options. Expecting…
/r/MensRights15/01/24 09:29 AM
2

You should break up because you frankly aren't ready for this sort of relationship. This may not be a popular take in this sub, but if this was an AITA post you would definitely be TA. It takes two to tango and she is being frank and honest with you about a theoretical discussion of a VERY difficult topic. If you lack compatibility then you should break up but this is about you, not her. She has done nothing wrong here.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 08:45 AM
18

You missed my point. I am discussing the ridiculous position of UK law. Not the practical reality.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 09:02 AM
20

Half of that statement is true in the UK too. Women can't be rapists. Men can be raped, but only by other men.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 06:28 AM
22

In fairness, the judge is only telling you the reality of the situation. Unless there's something else he said that's more objectionable; the fact is he's right. It's not acceptable that what he said is right, but we shouldn't go after people for telling the truth.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 05:55 AM
4

Are you familiar with the phrase "that asserted without evidence shall be dismissed without evidence?" Ruminate on it, tosser
/r/MensRights25/03/22 10:56 PM
12

I agree, but you asked for evidence of feminist resistance and there it is. Some women are absolutely all for it, and I'm sure some feminists; but as is usually the case, the loudest shriekers will represent the group and the silent will consent by their inaction
/r/MensRights25/03/22 05:46 PM
15

I don't know what FDS is. Feminists, the last time this topic came up (as it does every 5 years or so, never ends up being a product though...) There were articles in places like the Guardian about how men couldn't be trusted with the pill. Noted feminist Jessica Valenti penned at least one article on the subject. On this sub, Im rarely here these days so I couldnt say.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 05:39 PM
27

Because it shifts control. As it stands they have the unilateral decision to come off BC with or without his knowledge when they want a child. Not if both of you are using it. It also cuts the odds on an "accident" or it "not working" from very very low to "bitch please" levels of low. Assuming a similar efficacy to the female options a double shot at two 0.01% chances on the roulette table both coming off? Nah. Not buying it.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 05:23 PM
19

This is why I actively deprogram my kids at least once a week. The youngest (male) is still too young to really take a based position; but the eldest (female) is mostly brimming with hot takes since she now actively recognises the lies she is taught every day. It can be done, but your kids must respect you, and they must be encouraged to actively reason their beliefs. That which can't be defended logically is summarily rejected. That which can be is discussed openly. It is the only way.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:41 PM
1

So much of my militancy around bed times being observed is that I actually think it's important to spend time with your partner, and bedtime is the only time you will get for that. All the other hours of the day are and should be about the family, that brief couple of hours between kids bedtime and getting to sleep so you can get up for work in the morning are what keeps your relationship going. Without it you're just on a countdown to failure. It's concerning how few parents realise this, parti…
/r/MensRights08/08/20 08:49 AM
1

Fair enough, that isn't how it sounded to me but I'll agree to disagree.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 12:13 AM
-1

You are literally saying you will delete anything that falls onto one side of that highly controversial discussion. Now, I can see from further down the thread that you aren't doing so, assuming that's not by accident then I can only suppose that you didn't mean to say what you actually said.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 08:30 PM
1

Shhh, that name is verboten.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 07:00 PM
-3

Good to know we're fine with groupthink here, so long as it's the right kind of groupthink
/r/MensRights16/06/20 06:58 PM
2

A good progression to avoiding incarcerations where they can. Yes. That sounds eminently sensible and I actually agree with that. Where we differ is their decision to make that principle only apply to female offenders. The fact that you think its perfectly acceptable to operate what is effectively a two tier legal system by design is seriously disturbing to me. It already is a two tier legal system in practice, but enshrining that in public policy is frankly disgusting. Diversion and restorative…
/r/MensRights30/05/20 12:30 PM
2

So what you are saying is that your faith is better than my faith. Your faith that an outcome that would run counter to any position of common decency is correct, trumps my faith that it is incorrect. You are entitled to that view, im entitled to disregard it. As for next to no aptitude for legal understanding, you're entitled to your view on that, and im not going to dox myself, but all i can say on that is oh the irony... As for the point on tautology, you will note i said "damn near a tautolo…
/r/MensRights30/05/20 11:01 AM
2

Precedent works on like facts, you have decided that the facts were like because the court has ruled in a particular way. In other words their decision is right because it is their decision. A perverse abuse of the concept of precedent and damn near a tautology all rolled into one. Impressive. The defence in law has been around a long time. But that isn't what was being referred to, as you well know. HER defence, her use of this defence, came along at that point. After she had spent a significan…
/r/MensRights29/05/20 09:14 PM
2

Is that right? Present at the trial were you? Or are you spouting off appeals to authority bullshit, which is entirely what it sounds like. I'm very aware of the defence of diminished responsibility. Forgive me if I'm not convinced of it in light of the fact that the defence only seems to have come to light after a feminist group got involved. The statistics on bias in the criminal justice system are stark, and readily available. We know there is a dead person, we know that the accused travelled…
/r/MensRights29/05/20 07:12 PM
4

There is no amount of "emotional abuse" that justifies killing someone AFTER they have left you, and YOU have put yourself into their presence, and not only that gone equipped for the crime. Aside from the fact that there is absolutely no ethical justification for the very obvious murder charge being brought down to manslaughter, which would have been bad enough, to then award her his estate is an unbelievable insult. You can dress it up however you like, but if this had happened with the gender…
/r/MensRights29/05/20 04:35 PM
9

I'd go further than that. I've said it before, and I'll say it again, I'm in a relationship now, and with a good woman (despite her peculiarities) but if this relationship were to end there is no way id seek another. Not in this climate. It's nothing personal to the few good ones out there, but why would I willingly submit to a contract where effectively the other party can literally murder me with impunity and then the state will hand her everything I owned, no strings attached. Thats akin to d…
/r/MensRights29/05/20 04:30 PM
3

Not sure if this is common knowledge here but at least in this jurisdiction (UK) being drunk is a major aggravating factor in almost all criminal sentencing, not a mitigating one
/r/MensRights04/05/20 02:58 PM
2

I'm struggling to see the relevance of this distinction unless you believe that a significant number of men are circumcising themselves? If so, bravo that's some serious pain threshold...
/r/MensRights30/04/20 08:28 PM
14

Getting someone like her out of your life with minimal losses is an absolute win.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 08:18 AM
0

Weren't those who started the movement raging anti-Semites?
/r/MensRights13/02/20 08:17 AM
3

No no, there was a comma missing. Prisons, and Rotherham. Two separate locations :) It was only for the lulz to be fair, and I was half asleep :D
/r/MensRights22/01/20 02:33 PM
14

Now now now, it's rare but it exists. For example male prisons and Rotherham, UK if you're Muslim...
/r/MensRights22/01/20 07:38 AM
1

Ding ding ding
/r/MensRights07/01/20 09:33 AM
2

How does the fact that women prefer gay clubs change whether they go clubbing more than men? You also seem to be asserting a cause and effect relationship when in fact it may be you have it reversed. If women prefer gay clubs and your experience is that clubs have more men; then perhaps there are more men in your particular clubs because they are straight clubs and all the women are in gay bars?
/r/MensRights30/10/19 02:39 PM
2

I don't know but if I could take a pill that would make me legitimately gay, I'd do it in a heartbeat.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 12:34 PM
7

I'm really not sure that's true any more. In my experience women are far more fixated on "going out" and clubbing than men are in the 21st century. Men these days often seek out alternative forms of social interaction, such as online gaming. Women on the other hand are near biologically incapable of forgoing the dopamine hit of in person social interaction. And by social interaction I mean creating dramas and sniping at other women.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 12:33 PM
3

1: How does any of that change what I said, you said it's "easier" for men. It patently isn't. 2: No birth control is 100% effective. FTFY. 3: Yes, men are sometimes trapped, and men who wish to use condoms should. And most should wish to. Doesn't really change who has a wider range of options, and which are easier. 4: Some female birth control causes side effects. Not all. And even those not for all women. 5: A vasectomy is a good choice for men who don't want kids. Very good observation. But w…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 07:20 AM
2

I think that's a very fair question and in all honesty I don't know which is harder out of those. I suppose we could frame that as being acute versus chronic difficulty. The woman has to take longitudinal action to manage her fertility, which is potentially significant. The man has to take very short term action but in a significantly more acutely difficult moment. If I had to pick a side as to who has it harder, in that circumstance I'd probably say marginally the woman. The only reason for thi…
/r/MensRights13/10/19 11:46 AM
2

You are right that there is only one technology, multiple products. So I suppose we are both right on the singular Vs plural point. Yes, there are sometimes complications but those are generally due to the fitting and a competent doctor should be able to do this without significant issue. Same with allergy testing. Your general opinion is exactly right, both parties ought to discuss the matter and decide on the right way forward. I don't disagree with that at all. But I know that if I had an opt…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 08:55 PM
3

Well it's worse for the quality of sex that much is true. But for those not in LTRs I'd agree, it's the better bet. Mainly for its dual purpose in reducing STI risk. HBC does have side effects for some women, never disputed that. My point was that it varies; but as I said there are non-hormonal variants that are effective for up to a decade. As for expense, not a relevant factor in my calculations as all are available on the NHS here. In fact condoms come out by FAR the most expensive here. Unle…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 06:10 PM
5

None of that is incorrect. But none of it actually supports your previous assertion that birth control is "Easier" for men. Not all female birth control is hormonal. For example the all copper coil is highly effective. Further not all women get side effects from hormonal BC. I do advocate condom usage for most people, but that doesn't mean that it's the easiest option, compared to the wealth of options that women have, each admittedly having a range of pros and cons making not every solution rig…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 02:22 PM
2

That's a moot point unless we change tack on a number of different issues which are entirely outside feminism
/r/MensRights12/10/19 11:26 AM
1

You're kidding right? Women have a huge range of options which don't affect their enjoyment of sex and in many cases are a "fire and forget" solution, some for upto 10 years. Men, well we have condoms, which reduce the enjoyment and have to be constantly replenished and carried, or vasectomies which remove our ability to reproduce permanently. Aside from the lack of options for men, your point really runs counter to common sense. If you want to survive a bullet storm, you don't try to dodge each…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 11:14 AM
–

Not buying the less painful for infants angle. If the nervous system is fully formed, which I'm informed it is, then it will actually be more acutely painful. Same number of nerve endings in a smaller area.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 09:42 AM
3

Now available as a suppository!
/r/MensRights06/09/19 08:23 PM
2

Motion seconded
/r/MensRights06/09/19 06:11 PM
–

People have the idea that PhD immediately conveys a higher level of intellect, it doesn't. It conveys a higher level of specificity. Being a PhD means being an absolute expert in "something". Whether that "something" is useful or valuable is entirely secondary. Especially if it's progressive. Not only does it not need to be value, but the specificity of it means that it's inherently going to lead to more echo chamber thinking as you are consulting a narrower and narrower band of views as you dri…
/r/MensRights26/08/19 09:32 AM
1

Oh I agree I'm not saying there's much we can do about it at this point. And you are right it's rather like an abuse victim, because what they are doing is broadly aligned to a form of abuse. It's gaslighting on a societal scale. And I do agree, young people have a rebellious streak, and your generation may not have been as deep in as some others, but even rebellion can only occur within the confines of what is considered reality. If you want to quash rebellion, quash reality, or at least what i…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 12:12 PM
4

You're kidding right? They already do! What you are describing doesn't happen for a number of reasons: 1: It starts more subtle than that, they don't go straight for that stuff till the latter years by which point the kids are softened up to it and they communicate less with the parents. They aren't telling 7 year old boys they are responsible for rape. 7 year olds don't understand the concept. At young ages it's more about medicating them and laying the groundwork from which the later indoctrin…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 10:29 AM
3

Among the public perhaps. But they control every institution that matters. Education being their strongest ace in the hole. Third wave is like that turn in a 4X strategy game where you have overreached and you rely on your infrastructure before coming back stronger in the next wave. Their control of education will ensure that the next generation are all 4th wavers
/r/MensRights24/08/19 09:44 AM
1

Take my upvote you bastard! :P
/r/MensRights25/07/19 10:40 AM
85

I think perhaps his reasoning is that the law holds two contradictory positions on the status of a fetus. If the woman wants to kill it, it's not a person, and killing it is legal. If the man wants to kill it, it is a person, which is a fundamental requirement for the offense of murder. And killing it is therefore illegal. I don't think anyone is advocating whether either is an ethical thing to do, but his reasoning (as I interpreted it anyway) is logical.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 10:39 AM
9

I've heard this line of defence before. And at first glance it sounds reasonable. Until you realise our statute for rape is S1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Two thousand and fucking three. Let that sink in for a moment.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 10:31 AM
1

No problem :) it's an easy oversight to make, particularly since it is so egregious that she was acquitted that it actually beggars belief. I don't know what the specifics of the offense are in Australia, but if this occured under UK law it would be a very clear example of jury nullification and raises some serious questions about our culture. Questions that aren't new to us of course, but this would be a whole new level
/r/MensRights19/06/19 08:03 PM
11

Not as I understand it, she wasn't given a light sentence, she was acquitted
/r/MensRights19/06/19 06:26 PM
7

I don't know man, when I was working as a club DJ I was scratched, spat on and cursed out for refusing to take girls home. It's not that I'm super attractive, and nor were the girls involved, it's just a matter of the entitlement. It's more common than you might think. Especially if you are in an environment where you are for any reason the centre of attention.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 05:01 PM
1

Depends how invested the group is
/r/MensRights23/05/19 03:51 PM
1

There were studies that did show Gen Z to be more conservative but more recent studies have shown the reverse. This would suggest that something has happened between them. I suspect it's a cultivated response. In my experience children are actually pretty adept at determining right from wrong, fair from unfair, if given a properly explained abstract theoretical. Then they go into the education system, or perhaps more appropriately the "indoctrination system" I wonder how much of this is that lib…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 07:50 AM
1

Hmm... I'm not so sure. Before I settled down I was a relatively successful pickup addict for a time and found black girls without a doubt the hardest to get anywhere near
/r/MensRights28/04/19 07:42 AM
1

One does not preclude the other. Just because the data suggests they are the least desirable women doesn't instantly mean that they will change their level of attraction to white men.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 12:01 AM
4

True, I suppose our hopes of them facing a backlash depend upon either men taking their purchasing decisions out of the hands of their partners or women respecting the principle over convenience and supporting their partners boycott. All I can say is I used up the last of my supply of Mach 3's last month and my GF came home with a year's supply of Wilkinson Sword. I'm doing my part. Service guarantees citizenship, would you like to know more?
/r/MensRights25/04/19 06:29 AM
2

That's a distinction between in-world and out-world relevance. It may be relevant (and may always be) to the out-world (the audience) but that is the point, to show and lead towards a world where it isn't relevant. In an in-world sense of course it can be irrelevant, it's also not possible to fly a starship 60,000 light years but it can happen in a narrative. Shows have actually gotten this very right, like for example Star Trek The Next Generation. I've seen every episode multiple times and I d…
/r/MensRights25/04/19 06:25 AM
5

This, its a very very rare black woman that would consider for a second dating a white guy* *Standard exclusions apply, if a white millionaire male model wants a black girlfriend he isn't going to struggle
/r/MensRights25/04/19 06:15 AM
-1

I just checked the guidelines, 6 months is the maximum from what I can see. Less if she's charged under another section. Downvotes? Bitch I didn't write the guidelines, don't shoot the messenger XD
/r/MensRights12/04/19 05:54 PM
1

Perhaps they mean from a cannon, into the sun.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 05:45 PM
2

Other people might. Women certainly might. I personally never saw the point of the strip. It sure is shit isn't lubrication as it is above the blade and therefore is applied after the cut. I use my razor till it starts pulling too much to tolerate. Perhaps this is why I'm not their target audience :P
/r/MensRights08/04/19 07:03 PM
1

Well then the solution is simple, if your wife buys your razors then you inform her that either you will be buying your own or that Gillette are now on a boycott list and any of their men's products you find in the home will be immediately placed in refuse. My GF came home with some shave soap stuff the other day, Wilkinson Sword. Much appreciation was shown.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 11:04 AM
2

They won't. That's the whole "women are unhappier than they have ever been" thing in action
/r/MensRights12/12/18 11:59 AM
2

I agree that very few women would ever do this... Feminists however... These are the same demographic that believe in reasonable numbers that male access to non-barrier contraception would represent a threat to women's right to have children and that it's perfect acceptable to baby trap their partner or cuck their partner is he refuses them one. This would be small fry in the moral stakes for these people
/r/MensRights01/12/18 11:52 AM
1

I agree with your point about maternity/paternity leave but I'm sorry I don't agree about access to information to make good sex decisions. If you haven't managed to come by the information about where babies come from by the time the information is relevant then you really have noone to blame but yourself.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 11:43 AM
1

The last paragraph is the most resonating part for me. I had this misapprehension that when I started working at an organisation that is around 90% women that there would be a degree of understanding around childcare as I'm the primary care giver in our household (though we both work full time). And don't get me wrong, the nature of the role makes it inherently more flexible than most which is how they manage to get someone with our level of skills for the wages they pay. But there is a very cle…
/r/MensRights01/12/18 11:40 AM
1

I'm not an expert but this appears to be the definition of equality. Equity is just "the same" regardless of effort. Equality is what you are describing. Or a simpler term would be equality of opportunity Vs equality of outcome
/r/MensRights01/12/18 11:31 AM
1

Of course not, dasss rassiss!
/r/MensRights24/05/18 07:35 AM
5

Where to even start with this...
/r/MensRights24/05/18 07:26 AM
8

Meanwhile, in real jobs: Men, you will be wearing suits. Until you collapse from heat exhaustion, then you will be wearing a hospital gown, then back into your suit. Women, just don't wear clear heels and make sure we can't actually see all of your gusset and we're fine.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 07:17 PM
–

And not all men have been successful either. If you want to call this out as the fallacy it is (an apex fallacy) that's fine, but if you do that you are going to have to acknowledge that the fact that equally just because some men earn millions doesn't mean men earn more. "Power relations in society?" Got any more meaningless drivel that tells us precisely nothing? I think perhaps you are the one misunderstanding what a gendered pay gap means. Because you attribute it any meaning at all. It mean…
/r/MensRights15/04/18 03:58 PM
–

Any worse than what is said about men as academic education? Profanity of speech aside?
/r/MensRights15/04/18 10:39 AM
1

In my line of work I deal with a lot of pharma reps and I know a few personally as well. Their earnings:value ratio is very skewed. Most work with me now at a significantly lower earnings potential because of work life balance, they could earn much more despite their limited skillset if they went back to pharma.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 12:33 PM
0

Pretty sure they are synonymous, though cultivated appears to have an inference in the difference of agency in the process. Cultured appears largely neutral in that it could be an intrinsic process initiated and continued by the individual or extrinsic process initiated and continued by others upon the subject whereas cultivated suggests the latter. At least that would be my reading of that particular conjugation.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 12:30 PM
10

And every time it's been attempted who has protested it?
/r/MensRights27/03/18 06:53 PM
3

They really aren't. The simple fact is fat girls are higher up the food chain than beta males, unless that beta is overwhelmingly attractive. There are plenty of fat hookers plying a decent level of trade, that's how far off this comparison is.
/r/TheRedPill26/03/18 03:33 PM
1

I've been debating recently whether to share an experience I had over the course of 18 years dating a woman with diagnosed narcissistic personality disorder. Not sure if it's something people would be interested in reading.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/18 12:50 PM
1

I love that the 85% conviction rate is deemed an indication that the system is working correctly. Yes, we convicted 100% of our witch trials last year so the system is clearly functioning perfectly... These are supposedly educated people FFS.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 08:34 AM
2

I'm not bitter, I'm resigned. There is a difference. Some effects flow naturally from actions and you accept them. It doesn't mean you want those particular effects, but they are the price you pay for other benefits. Having kids is no different. The woman I want to be with has 2 children, so I became a stepfather. Would I have chosen these options from an ideal world menu of life? Probably not at this stage in my life. Unlike a biological father I have every right to walk away at any time if I w…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 03:06 PM
1

No I just got into a serious relationship with a woman with 2 kids. In fairness to her she never demanded I take them on in the way that I have, they do have contact with their father and he's a good father, for the most part. But I don't think you can live in that sort of household and not take on the role to some extent. That has through the course of our career changes over the last couple of years lead to me actually being the primary care giver as her work is more lucrative and less flexibl…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 02:56 PM
1

Oh I still care, I just don't have the time. I acquired the children when I was I was a leather clad biker nomad in my physical prime. Now I'm 20lbs heavier and haven't ridden in 18 months.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 08:15 AM
1

As a person who recently acquired 2 children I can say this. No. No you can't. Not really
/r/MensRights23/02/18 08:10 AM
1

No I think the issue here is that as a teacher at an entirely different institution she had no power dynamic over the student. Unless I've misunderstood, or the US system includes it somehow. I love seeing the pussy pass denied as much as anyone, but as I see it her argument has merit, whether she is making it to save her skin or not
/r/MensRights13/02/18 08:29 AM
23

To understand that you have to understand the feminist "lens". While you, me, and rational people might see a club where men have a beer and chat about their lives, a feminist sees a oak panelled cigar smoke filled inner politburo with extremely fat cats plotting to take away 22c from every dollar etc
/r/MensRights07/02/18 06:52 AM
1

Wrote MGTOW 10x On a dating site Seems legit
/r/MensRights24/12/17 12:35 PM
2

Excellent, I'm pleased, it did appear that was what you were suggesting for a moment
/r/MensRights16/09/17 05:05 PM
2

I'm trained to do a lot of things. It's whether I apply that training or not which matters. If you are under the impression that professionals don't have bias then you are sorely in need of more reading. Judges for example are also trained to recognise and eliminate bias...
/r/MensRights16/09/17 04:46 PM
3

In that both are fallible, and subject to their own biases? Absolutely
/r/MensRights16/09/17 04:20 PM
1

He isn't aiming for an original thought. He's outlining the TRP manifesto. Now, I'm not a TRP poster any more, but I spent a lot of time there back in the day, before it got out of hand. Their arguments were sound and their advice effective. I went from 18 month long dry spells to being able to spin an average of 5-6 casual partners at a time. Which isn't a fulfilling life, don't get me wrong. But spinning that many casuals allowed me to deal with the issues I had, and gave me the exposure to be…
/r/MensRights16/09/17 02:27 PM
4

This rather implies that therapists don't have an agenda. They can be (usually in fact) extremely ideological. If I had an issue in my relationship you can be sure as shit the last place I'd be going is to a therapist. I can roll over and accept my "toxic masculinity" for free if that's the route I want to take, I don't need to pay £200 an hour to have it beaten into me
/r/MensRights16/09/17 02:20 PM
11

Well defamation is a civil matter so you don't convict anyone of it. But yes, you are right it's a 50/50 standard in civil court Vs a 99.9% standard (in theory) in criminal
/r/MensRights16/09/17 02:17 PM
2

It's probably mostly herd behaviour rather than a truly instinctive reaction. Instinct explains a lot but as higher functioning cognitive beings there needs to be more, instincts can be overruled. The thing that prevents this here is likely herd mentality
/r/MensRights13/09/17 10:28 AM
3

Or maybe one shouldn't expect it to be paid for them and should be expecting Dutch to be the default, with any deviation the surprise. As for the "whoever asks, pays" line, I'm somewhat ok with that, even though it's almost always the male. But I prefer the "whoever choses the venue at least pays half" line. Because one pattern I note a lot is that women are very fond of choosing expensive venues, whether the male would be happier with something modest or not. If she choses the venue she should …
/r/MensRights10/09/17 04:26 PM
1

Wow, that's a very fortunate school
/r/MensRights30/08/17 11:20 AM
3

The man, the legend...
/r/MensRights21/08/17 06:43 AM
7

Hmm... She's an idiot but she is an idiot who has actually came upon an interesting point, though she has explored it like Stevie Wonder negotiating a garden maze... It is interesting that men tend to avoid going for the nut blow, but the idea that it's some secret pact is just an expression of the way a feminist lens poisons everything one sees. In truth I don't have the evidence as to exactly why men tend to behave this way, since pragmatically going for the pills is often a very effective way…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:11 PM
3

O_o what jurisdiction is this? A lot of places, certainly the UK has a very distinct rape law, separate from sexual assault. S1 sexual offences act 2003 as opposed to S7 (I think, the legislature website is playing silly buggers again)
/r/MensRights29/06/17 04:48 PM
8

Weak bait man
/r/MensRights15/06/17 09:28 PM
–

In my experience "invisible disabilities" tend to be trumped in the seat priority stakes by "missing a fucking limb disabilities"
/r/MensRights15/06/17 08:41 PM
–

The natural consequence being that if you are male looking to get into STEM you are now by definition at a disadvantage, an actual disadvantage, not just a perceived disadvantage, because of your gender.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 07:13 PM
–

Alas I am bested, oh the shame, the shame of it all...
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:43 PM
–

You're gonna need bigger bait.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:56 PM
–

Umm... He's saying the article isn't victim blaming but he, the poster, thinks that he may be partly to blame. Perfectly reasonable position IMO
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:05 PM
–

This, far less likely to come off. Women date up, and ESPECIALLY fuck up. Very few women would consider sleeping with their subordinates as by their very nature they don't have what women want in a man
/r/MensRights21/02/17 08:17 PM
10

I seem to recall one of the left leaning outlets, may have been the Guardian doing a whole piece where they chalked up their palms, steeled themselves and attempted the beyond Olympic standard mental gymnastics to justify this. They just came out and said "it's fine when women do it, here is why" To them it's not even a hypocrisy, it's "just different" that's how warped they really are
/r/MensRights09/02/17 04:55 PM
-5

Oh well that's alright then.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 10:06 AM
4

As per Rasalom72's comment, no shit sherlock. Not only do they marry up, but where resources are limited parents will often allocate more to the daughter than the son. Case in point - The number of girls in my high school who in the last few years where they could legally drive were turning up in brand new or nearly new cars, compared to the number of boys. Usually justified on the "Well she's a girl, so she cant be breaking down, its a safety issue" grounds. While the same families would if the…
/r/MensRights01/12/16 12:38 PM
1

Triggering intensifies
/r/MensRights18/11/16 08:46 AM
–

Yeah this has been the case for a long time. My brother had a fairly horrific fall down a set of council owned stairs when he was about 10. Sliced his knee open to the point where his kneecap was fully exposed. Massive scarring. We considered a case against the council for poor maintenance. When we consulted a lawyer they said that they couldnt advise a case because the damages would be disproportionately small because as a boy the scarring wont be considered seriously. Had he been a girl, it wo…
/r/MensRights16/11/16 12:10 PM
–

Welcome to the real world, twas ever thus. I've literally had hour long debates with my relatively reasonable and entirely non-feminist girlfriend about this. Why it is that at a seminar at her workplace I had to wear a horrid non-breathable shirt rather than the nice wool jumper I wanted to wear, while she swanned in wearing a wool cardigan. Apparently it's "just whats expected, and rightly so"
/r/MensRights03/11/16 11:04 PM
6

Nah man didn't you hear, every morning the MIB come round and forcefully euthanise anyone who doesn't take their interval contraceptive pill
/r/MensRights02/11/16 04:19 PM
12

Or suspect they may want them in the near to mid future. So that would be statistically almost all of them then... Not saying some women don't want children, but let's not pretend that the vast majority don't get that clock tick at some point in their lives. My current girlfriend said for years she never wanted any. Net result: 2 kids. And a promise to try for a 3rd when I'm in the right position to do so. My ex before that, same, then met me in her mid 30s, boom, suddenly wants a kid. To the ex…
/r/MensRights02/11/16 04:18 PM
2

If it's a myth it's widespread since it's always been my understanding also
/r/MensRights02/11/16 04:00 PM
2

You wonder it because it's true. A large body of women see their kids entirely like this. A piece of property, and when in a divorce situation, a weapon and tool. A child, to a woman, is the ultimate virtue jewellery. Its a little accessory that proves her fertility for future men, her virtue as a caregiver and nurturer. It's not much different to a puppy. At my age, it was hard to find many people to date who didn't have kids who wasn't significantly younger than me (which as I found, carried i…
/r/MensRights18/10/16 09:47 AM
–

So let me see if i understand this correctly? He disagrees with your "Facts" which you have not actually sourced. This equates with his failure to understand them? He argues that it is likely that the woman made a false allegation, rather than the police inventing it off their own back. And that criticism of a woman somehow makes him a lurking feminist? He discusses the case at hand, and this somehow constitutes derailing? And finally you "Report" him, do you have a tumblr account you can block …
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:02 PM
9

Three words: Divide and conquor. Its really that simple. Women dont want men having male spaces because a front is strongest when its united, and they hate the idea of men bonding, and potentially forming an in-group bias like they have with other women. The fact is they know that their position is only supported by unthinking male acquiesence. If men (Not that they would owing to that sweet sweet testosterone) suddenly decided not to take womens shit unilaterally and collectively, as a united f…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 11:48 AM
1

You don't prove a negative genius. You prove a hypothesis, and provide a null hypothesis, and the onus is to prove the positive. The hypothesis you are relying on is that it is abuse, pretty much every school of philosophy and critical thinking puts the burden of proof squarely in your court. Best of luck.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 01:27 AM
1

And I'm telling you that it doesn't really matter worth a fig where a law came from if it's bigotry. You've gone from an appeal to chivalry to an appeal to authority. You're upgrading your fallacies, love the ambition kid. You know there were a lot of laws against a lot of things that we changed because they were wrong. It's literally why appeal to authority isn't a rational argument, things like say sodomy. I suppose by extension you support the treatment of Alan Turing during his life then? Si…
/r/MensRights18/09/16 01:23 AM
1

I think you'll find that the burden of proof for establishing that something is X, falls ok the person making the claim. It isn't for me to prove that it's not, it's for you prove that it is. Literally critical thinking 101.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 02:42 PM
1

So in other words the appeal to chivalry argument. Gotcha. Look, if you want to use 1000 words when the following would suffice: "I am a bigot who supports inequality before the law" Then thats fine, ramble away. I mean none of it really made much sense in terms of actually answering the point. But it's always entertaining to watch someone's verbal diarrah hit the floor so thanks for that.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 02:38 PM
1

Maybe because two people of the same age experimenting isn't abuse? Maybe because it's not always bright to apply a faulty logic from one situation and adapt it into another even less relevant situation. It's not how sensible policy is made. Is there ANY indication any of the above listed "whataboutisms" happened here? Even if there were, are we saying that teen boys are inherently smarter than teen girls? Since your position supposes that they could never be duped in this way. Or maybe it's jus…
/r/MensRights17/09/16 07:52 AM
1

As I understand it those were not the age gaps involved here. But tell me more about how the morality of a totally different situation applies here
/r/MensRights17/09/16 07:46 AM
2

Well if we want to be really smart arsed and retarded at the same time (and reading your post it seems obvious that you do) then she should also be charged with production of child pornography, AND possession since it will have been on her phone also. Of course we could just not be morons and stop criminalising teens for doing what teens do.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 07:56 PM
1

Like I say it depends on the wording used. They can interpret but it is limited, even if they draft a statute which is severely hampered by the wording it has used they can't rephrase it. Their interpretation has to follow the actual words used. If the statute relates specifically to a male, then that's jenga, not a damn thing a court can do about it. If it's non-specific or ambiguous, then yes, they can interpret it to include women if they chose. And there's every chance it is specific on the …
/r/MensRights07/09/16 07:26 PM
2

I agree with everything you said except one thing: A court has no remit to rewrite a law. That falls to the executive to draft and the legislature to ratify. The judiciary may interpret, nothing more. Whether it was or wasn't possible to interpret this to include women would require a reading of the specific language used in statute
/r/MensRights07/09/16 12:13 PM
1

Probably, and I'm only supposing here, because in a legal sense a test isn't ENTIRELY necessary. In UK law, as may be the case here, the purported father can indeed refuse a test. But if he does the court will infer that he has something to hide and find him the be the father unless there is other evidence to the contrary. Ultimately, forcing men to submit to a test as an absolute COULD be construed as a violation of their human rights. So, in some ways it makes perfect sense to offer the nomina…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:59 AM
1

If that's the law where you live, then you are within your rights to apply it. It's not a law I would like to see here, it leaves far too much scope for people to get away with straight up homicide on very questionable grounds, but your country whichever it might be has the right to set whatever laws it chooses.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 05:11 PM
2

Absolutely, I don't disagree with you there, and nor (at least in British case law) do the courts. It's about what is reasonable and proportionate in ALL of the circumstances. It is REASONABLE to be scared, and reasonable for a jury to find that you genuinely feared even if the actual threat turns out to be false (say a replica firearm, as the classic example). Of course that leeway only goes so far, but it does exist.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 05:09 PM
1

Your reaction really does suggest that perhaps I SHOULD bring your penis size into it, since you do seem angry for no particular reason other than that some people don't think you should be able to respond to every threat with bullets. In my experience people who love their firearms quite as much as you do are in fact compensating for something, but I'm kind of done arguing with you. If you want to go shooting people, you have at it. And when the law deals with you appropriately you can cry abou…
/r/MensRights15/08/16 05:02 PM
3

You may have a point there, I will gladly concede.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 04:59 PM
1

It's really a matter of how real the threat is. There is a difference between brandishing a weapon and acting in the use of that weapon, you appeared to be suggesting that there ought to be no degree of reasonableness requires to justify self defense. Well with that train of thought every minor disagreement has the potential to end up a fatality, if you go remote enough, it's only a test of reasonableness that stops situations as ludicrous as that which I was describing. And yes, it is determine…
/r/MensRights15/08/16 04:58 PM
–

Pretty much every piece of case law where a defendant has attempted a self defense plea and failed has done so because they are deemed to have escalated the situation beyond what was reasonable and proportionate. Frankly I haven't the time to pull you out a thousand cases so the case of Tony Martin should suffice. You won't need a full citation it made front page news in the United Kingdom over the course of a number of years. There were threats to him and his family made by a group of youths wh…
/r/MensRights15/08/16 01:59 PM
–

In what way? If the response isn't required to be reasonable or proportionate I could shoot you dead for disagreeing with my opinion in an overly vociferous way. Laws are built upon principles of justice. And justice is served in self defense by the actions of the righteous being reasonable and proportionate to the situation. Which is exactly what the law requires here.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 01:52 PM
–

Because a threat is not the same as an action. The aim of law should be to reduce harm and increase public safety. It does not achieve this by allowing members of the public to escalate situations to suit their own ego or John Wayne ambitions. We have ALL made silly threats. Done silly things, and justice is not served by allowing straight up murder in response to a threat. You seem to miss the point. You defend yourself by the act of drawing. By returning his threat and indicating you mean to u…
/r/MensRights15/08/16 01:49 PM
–

Because you haven't given him a chance to retreat and you have escalated the situation. Making you effectively the aggressor. If you live in a jurisdiction where handguns are legal, and you were faced with this, yes, you could draw on him. But to draw and fire when the assailant is static is just straight up murder because you effectively leapfrogged his level of threat with your own. If you drew and he came at you. Fire away, his threat is lethal making your equally lethal threat proportionate.…
/r/MensRights15/08/16 11:05 AM
–

Hmm... That's not entirely true. Reasonable isn't as vague as it appears once you actually look at the case law, and it's followed by the word "proportionate" So, someone comes at you with a knife. You fear you may suffer an assault, this makes self defensive action, even pre-emptive action in some cases a reasonable response so long as the belief is itself reasonable as defined by the standard clapham omnibus test. So, man with a switchblade in a dark alley - Average person on the street would …
/r/MensRights15/08/16 09:46 AM
2

Hmm... I think on balance what you say isn't entirely incorrect but it does ignore the realities of sexual interaction between men and women. Women are (supposed to be) fully adult human beings with the capacity to express themselves. We have age of consent laws to distinguish between those the mental capacity to understand sexual consent. Once a person is an adult they are expected to be able to assert themselves to some degree. Men are expected to be the pursuers in sex. We are EXPECTED to pus…
/r/MensRights28/07/16 11:59 AM
1

Possibly because unlike straight women they have the misfortune of having to deal with the shitstorm that is a relationship with a woman...
/r/MensRights27/07/16 10:02 AM
3

No, they aren't, but within context they can be evidence of reasonable belief in consent. Take for example my girlfriend, in our relationship not once has she vocalised consent. Not a single time. It's massively inferred by context, I mean sometimes this girl initiates by waking me up with my junk already in her mouth. But still, no words. If they have engaged in a similar ongoing sexual relationship, with similar previous parameters, it would be evidence that he was reasonable in believing she …
/r/MensRights27/07/16 08:34 AM
0

Well if penis massage were a new thing, or if some firm were to rebrand a hand job the way this firm have, they probably would write an article about it yes. It might well be slightly less favourable than this one, and of course the feminists would be up in arms, but the fact that it's being reported isnt really a double standard. It's just more of a novelty this way around and novelty breeds clicks. It's rather like that Harmsworth quote that I will now butcher. "When a dog bites a man, that's …
/r/MensRights15/07/16 02:19 PM
1

They occupy a tricky legal position. Technically speaking no, they are illegal if more than one girl is working on the premises. But depending on the police force involved it's often never enforced. So long as the people involved follow certain rules. GMP for example have an unofficial zone in Bury where it's agreed they will turn a blind eye to brothels inside. But will nail any outside. It's an attempt to keep the problem contained. Ultimately, until someone reports this brothel, we have no id…
/r/MensRights15/07/16 05:57 AM
–

Not sure I'm seeing a double standard, happy ending massage parlours are common in the UK.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 08:49 PM
7

I did read it. I also read with interest the recent case also in the UK of the woman who came after her multimillionaire ex husband who made his fortune AFTER their divorce, and won. It was also a first for a case of its type. Just because it hasn't happened before doesn't mean it can't happen, and the trend in family law at the moment appears to be swinging further in women's favour. And if the way lawyers are educated has anything to do with it, it will get worse before it gets better. Ultimat…
/r/MensRights05/07/16 09:47 AM
–

She'll win. It's the way they are going at the moment
/r/MensRights04/07/16 10:03 PM
1

Had to disappoint my ex over this film today, she wanted us to see it, I told her I was boycotting so I'd take her to perve on Tarzan instead. She took it pretty well haha
/r/MensRights25/06/16 04:07 PM
7

Yeah on paper she is all for equality, and on SOME issues she will readily agree with me. But she has this tendency to see smaller issues as "Whining". Which it may well be, but thats rather missing the point. Often her retort is "Oh yes you men are so hard done by" with a smile, basically attempting to disarm the discussion because she cant be bothered attempting to defend an indefensible position.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 01:38 PM
–

Yup, I get no further with my GF. She's a smart woman, PhD in a STEM field, but when presented with a rational argument on some men's issues she will resort to sarcasm and appeals to popularity/authority/society. And when you point out that this isn't an argument she will just repeat it till you get bored
/r/MensRights22/06/16 10:29 AM
–

I don't entirely disagree with you. And no one is saying it ought to be a legal obligation. Just that within a relationship it's scumbag behaviour. That's my view. You can take it or leave it.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:28 PM
1

Because there are big question marks over my fertility. Medical issues. Not impossible clearly, but unlikely. I'm not. We split and I'm in a different relationship now and far happier. Wasn't over this shockingly. What we split over was far worse.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 03:59 PM
–

Ever had a child you conceived despite massive odds, when you want a child and may never get another chance, aborted from underneath you without her even telling you, because your girlfriend felt it might disrupt her work schedule? Ever had experience of how that feels? No? Didn't think so
/r/MensRights14/06/16 01:05 PM
3

The OS is simple to use (if you are already versed in it, its really no easier/harder at its core than Ubuntu) until something goes wrong Then you're in a world of hurt. Every time my GF's macbook goes wrong, which it does considerably more often than my Windows 10 machine, i throw a chicken in the pentangle to see how much of my life is about to disappear...
/r/MensRights22/05/16 10:30 AM
2

It's light as fuck, I can bang the shit out of it, it boots up in under 30 seconds, and can be dropped while hot without losing any data. Other than the light as fuck part, which i will confess to since this thing weighs about as much as Jupiter, all of those are equally true of my 3 year old i7 Lenovo which is still operating flawlessly for £700 In fact 30 seconds would be a very very uncharitable estimate now its on an SSD, id put it at around half that, perhaps less i never bother checking.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 10:27 AM
3

As the other guy said - Gaslighting is a powerful thing. Especially if a man has a lot to lose by leaving. We practice trust but verify here. If you are going to verify, be thorough. And if you turn nothing up, great. You can rest easier. Stalking is a BP bitch term in this context. There is no threat to her, no PI trailing her, noone rummaging through her underwear drawer for evidence, and no invasion of her personal space. Just verification of her words. The removal of her ability to lie and g…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 08:20 AM
2

Depends on exactly how much hold she has in reality. If shes just some plate, I agree. If shes a relatively new LTR, ditto. But YMMV, you may have kids, or you may THINK you have kids. There are infinite individual complications to relationships that vary the appropriate response. And sometimes you want to absolutely know before you pull the trigger.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 08:11 AM
3

Some guys have to know. Its how they process betrayal. I know I'm one of those guys. And it depends on the context of your relationship. Limiting investment is always sound until you are confident, but if you are already emotionally invested you won't want to drop it based purely on an emotion. You will want to trust, but verify
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 08:09 AM
1

If you can get one she won't recognise sure. The beater shouldn't cost you much, just drop it back on Gumtree/ebay when you are done
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 08:07 AM
7

It depends how good she is to be honest, but there are always ways. Think outside the box. And once thought out, actually follow through. I had my suspicions about my ex, and I knew techniques I could have used in the context of our relationship to find out the truth, but I let my mind slip and put it on the back burner. Big mistake. The biggest thing I can say about verification is that in the modern world it has never been easier. Monitoring and surveillance technology has never been cheaper o…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/16 01:00 PM
2

threatened to cry rape if he didn’t succumb to her demands as she stripped down to her underwear This shit is why I can't wait for discreet always on personal recording to become more available. Google glass linked to a SD card on your phone recording where you are and what you do, constantly. But only available to you.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 11:01 AM
1

Yeah, after the shock has worn off, and ive dealt with it all I'm feeling rather different about it. I'm not going to let this define me as a man. Yes, I got played, and yes, I got betrayed. But you know what, a girl who has slept with over 1800 men chased me till the ends of the earth knowing I had no money. Or nothing on her scale anyway. Some of her clients are multi-multi millionaires. She lived that lifestyle and still chased me. Begged me. For 18 months. Hell she is still chasing me. And d…
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 01:03 PM
1

The real kicker with this girl, she actually has brains. And qualifications. And experience. She has worked, verifiably, for government institutions as a therapist. She could earn in excess of the average national wage VERY easily, and has done. She could have the white picket fence, without any of this, financially at least. But she is pure greed. Nothing is worth more to her than adding more zeros to the end of her bank balance. Which makes it interesting what she ever wanted with me, my entir…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/16 01:40 PM
1

The money thing was neither here nor there since she revealed moderately early on that she HAD been one, hence was mortgage free and had bought all this shit, And she did have a legit well paying job alongside it, so the fact she had loads of cash about the place wasnt that shocking.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/16 01:13 PM
3

I'd love to think that but in reality she won't. She will die very comfortable in the fortune she has amassed, with a guy who knows nothing. Unfortunately women rarely get an unhappy ending. She certainly wont. She's perfectly content with what she is. And more power to her. Its just a shame that she really doesn't have any feelings to hurt.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 05:57 PM
1

Much needed masculinity? Well in essence that would match her words yes. She always maintained that comparing me to her exes was like "comparing a man to boys". Her friends seemed to hold the same view. Of course those same friends all knew about this it seems. Most of them were in the game themselves or formerly. But, right now its hard to feel in the least bit masculine. I was cucked a thousand times. That tattoo of my initial on her inner thigh, men have been dropping loads on that in their h…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 04:58 PM
1

Thats the hilarious part. Most of our fighting has been over the fact that she fucked up (in other ways) and I plated her. She will only stand that for a few weeks, then she comes back for more with ultimatums. Usually she will lose the ultimatum, go away for a while and then come back again. Now I see what she was doing in those times. And I'm starting to see why she engineered so many fights. She couldn't work with me around all the time. Especially since ive just found out quite a bit of it w…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 04:41 PM
1

Exactly. That's the part that sickens. I have no moral issue with what she is. I have moral issue with how shes handled it regarding me. I am one of the few guys she will ever meet who probably could have handled this under a fair deal. But then she never wanted a fair deal. She wanted the benefits of being "the good wife", with the benefits of being a whore with none of the downsides. And was quite happy to ruin me to get it.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 04:39 PM
2

Yeah it certainly seems so. I won't be doing any more
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 04:35 PM
1

If it was purely casual, maybe I'd be fine with that. But it never could be. Once you love someone you can't just switch them off. If I'd known this at the start I could have kept them in check better. And kept it casual, but it still wouldn't have worked. Reason being - She demands a serious relationship. Monogamy (other than occasional swinging which she offered plenty of in the beginning but then engineered out of the later stages) and full commitment. Yes, you heard that right, the girl gett…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 04:34 PM
2

Grandiosity is a massive trend for her. I seem to recall once expressing interest in an Alfa Spider, but said it would have to wait till after Law school finished. She offered to buy me one. That's her level. Its insane. Massive grand gestures to make herself look good. In reality I can't initiate contact, she has blocked me on all channels. Short of showing up at her house I can't even if I wanted to. And as much as its going against a thousand examples where she has, she won't be back this tim…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 04:31 PM
2

I think on balance its unlikely that she actually wanted me to find out. For a number of reasons: 1: Even when faced with very very strong evidence, she clung to her denials. If she wanted me to find out she would have just come out with it when I found her profile and pictures. She actually claimed it was an impersonator using her old pics. It was only when I found her forum entries corresponding with recent life events and hilariously, our arguments, that she finally capitulated in a grandiose…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 09:38 AM
2

Sad part is, if she played this right at the start, and modified her expectations of me and what this "relationship" would be, she probably would have been able to make that fly. If I knew this from the start, I could have regulated my level of investment, wouldn't have caught feelings, and we actually could have made something work. If she wanted me around that badly. She certainly has the charm to persuade a guy into something like that. But that wouldn't have worked for her, she wanted a husb…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 09:28 AM
1

So your suggestion is I keep fucking this girl on a casual basis?
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 09:23 AM
2

I actually get that. But a help desk guy doesn't tell you you can only use his help desk. And noone else's. And tell you that you are the only person he's helping. I have no issue with the sex trade, I have issue with the fact that she deliberately ensnared me alongside. Granted as said repeatedly, I'm still the moron who went blue and fell for it. But the whole thing seems completely motiveless and downright evil. She didnt need (or receive) my money. She clearly didn't need me for sex. I find …
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 03:47 AM
2

Yup, she's definitely bright. It was a large portion of her appeal over my LTR to be honest. Coming from a girl who could at best be described as 'a bit dim' to a girl who could converse confidently on any topic, who could school even me on music, who had impeccable taste. On top of everything else, I was weak as fuck to that. But she will do well. She has a good system for largely keeping it out of the public eye, she has the business acumen to invest it wisely, and a good cover job. I dont eve…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 03:33 AM
5

Umm... Why are the odds zero exactly? I mean maybe I'm missing something but she is literally getting different penis on an hour by hour basis. How is there any reduced risk? And you are basically suggesting I become a cuck
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 02:58 AM
2

The lack of bitching didn't last. Eventually she did get upset about it. Never really bitched. Just cried a lot. She isn't hideous, shes beautiful in her own way, but shes overweight. We both were, I did something about it. She didnt. Well technically she did. Gastic bypass. Dropped 10st. And then put half of it back on. I for my part lost 7 in total, at the gym. Got a reasonable physique, Adonis belt just barely visible. I could have dealt with that if she was at least dirty, but she wasn't. At…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 02:57 AM
5

Hell of an analysis. Definitely an interesting read, and you have some solid points. Not sure what you mean by the last sentence though, almost suggests you think i should go back to her? :-S
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 12:30 AM
3

Uhh no, actually im not, i realise i was an idiot. But that doesnt mean others cant learn from my stupidity.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 11:35 PM
3

Pretty much. But, lesson learned. Time to bone up on the fundamentals again, had a nasty case of Blue-Shift and its time to get back to business. Starting with taking the time im no longer devoting to her to improving my grades in the final year of my law degree. They slid to a point where ive really been doing very mediocre during this time, too much stress and distraction. Honestly its a testament to the fact i must have an aptitude for this that im still on course for a solid 2:1, with more f…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 11:02 PM
4

Its a fair point, the sheer scale of this is impressive in its own way
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 10:46 PM
3

If you think this bitch doesnt deserve to be judged, yeah you can fuck off back to BP. With all 18 days of your experience
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 10:33 PM
3

Yeah saddest part is that i was never asked to wrap it once with her. And i actually bought the lies so i didnt. I was tested moderately recently, and clear, but i think its time it was redone
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 10:24 PM
15

Ive been here for a lot longer than a year, though primarily on a previous account. Honestly, i slipped back to a lot more blue behaviours. There were mitigating factors as to why, a lot of supplicating was done because she had incriminating evidence on me for other matters, and was narcissistic enough to use it. A large part of the relationship was in part under the umbrella of blackmail. Now, thats on me for letting a woman get too close to my shit. No doubt about that. And its on me for slipp…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 10:19 PM
11

In reality, yes. I might think like a bastard, i make a good bastards assistant, if i dont have to see the harm done. But im a sucker for a sob story and thats my downfall in many ways
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 10:08 PM
5

Yeah not sure that ex is the same as current. I didnt persue her for shit, i got addicted to the kind of sex only that sort of girl can provide, and she persued me for more. And i ended up giving it. Yeah, i should have had better standards, and yeah, maybe i did lack self respect going anywhere near her. But you know what, yes, i will fucking judge her. Because what she has done, and is doing, in terms of the deception involved, is very worthy of being judged. An idiot is not more morally blame…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 10:06 PM
6

Yeah my wife didnt cheat. At least not that i know if. I was the cheating one. I best re-read the post to make sure that was clear because i dont know where thats come from. EDIT Realise i only addressed half your post. The starfish in bed thing, i think its more about her than anything else, she was willing, in fact she would often chase me for it. Especially later on when i became less interested. But she couldnt really do much, no skill, and no desire to learn. Very very catholic. And general…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 09:58 PM
1

Yeah she knows i post here, from back before she really meant anything to me. Wasnt really that fussed if it cost me her as a plate, she was very bright and we got onto philosophical subjects and RP segwayed in. And yeah, it would appear i am a bad judge of character. Well... actually i dont know because i always knew her to be a bit of a slut, i suppose its more of a signal noise issue. If you know these things about her, your instinct that shes fucking around gets lost in the noise of the thin…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 09:57 PM
14

Even for a non-MRA, If Hillary wins the nomination, and its a two horse race, trump is the only choice. And the rest of the world will simply marvel that out of a population in excess of 150m, these were the two America picked to represent them
/r/MensRights24/02/16 10:33 AM
3

You know an industry is in trouble when its having to offer £25,000 bursaries to get people to even consider training in it. I get a call from DfE every month or so trying to get me on a PGCE to teach computing, i would rather eat my own stump than teach these little scrotes how to use Excel. Honestly, at this point the state of modern parenting and child behaviour is one of the larger reasons why im somewhat reluctant to have kids. Because i can do my best until the age of about 5, but once the…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 03:04 PM
1

Got an ex pushing this "vow of celibacy" bullshit on me right now. And thats exactly what it is, a total lie designed to push the same obligation back on me. So transparent
/r/TheRedPill20/02/16 09:28 AM
1

I think its universal that it makes it harder. But I would agree, I say near impossible, but not completely. And on your last paragraph. It goes without saying that this is true but for a lot of guys being "sufficiently attractive" to balance that out is simply beyond their genetic capabilities. Unless you are extremely wealthy, or fucking HB5's or lower.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/16 08:20 PM
1

A plate, who became a girlfriend (and then back and forth ad nauseum between those statuses due to her nature) used to be a working girl. Yes I know, never LTR these girls etc etc, but she was tremendous in bed, articulate and charming, and I done fucked up. She got me into it, decent little part time earner while I'm in law school. Set me down a mental Saul Goodman mindset though haha. Seem far more interested in being a Machiavellian Mr Loophole now than a Harvey Dent. I went into this wanting…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/16 08:14 PM
1

With regards to the job, surprisingly no. I suppose its because in general its a very businesslike thing, other than if a dispute were to arise, which it almost never does, i dont even see the clients, naturally i spend a fair bit of time on the road with the girls, and we talk a lot, but no really enlightening experiences to share that come specifically with the role. None that arent merely demonstrations of other RP doctrines in action, rather than new wisdom. Shit tonnes of relevant experienc…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/16 04:38 PM
5

I think it depends on the woman. I'm usually honest about my past, at least some of it, pretty early on. Reason being it's left physical effects that are immediately noticeable once clothes come off and I'd rather be rejected early than cause disappointment or disgust at my body. Which looks epic clothed, but merely adequate naked. Some have bolted. Some have reacted with awe at the mental focus required to achieve the transformation. Perhaps recognising the lack of the same in themselves. But o…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/16 10:33 AM
3

Depends on the situation. Its not as straightforward as that. Never be fooled into forgetting the value of the dominance that flows from asserting your hold over a woman. If you think she is just playing you, I'd tend to agree, but ive had more than a few women who admit to being massively turned on by a territorial streak. Its a thing you have to judge on a case by case basis. Dont defend your land, as here - Could come across as abundance mentality, but could easily come across as a lack of ba…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/16 10:11 AM
1

Sadly not a pimp, just a minder. Our "pimp", though it doesn't really work that way here, is actually a woman
/r/TheRedPill13/02/16 02:45 AM
2

Brb... Applying for research funding Seriously though, my world would be a happier place were it not, but this is in fact reality
/r/TheRedPill13/02/16 02:40 AM
1

Sadly not, fo shizzle, or something...
/r/TheRedPill13/02/16 02:35 AM
2

Haha no, I'm just a minder :)
/r/TheRedPill12/02/16 02:59 PM
10

Definitely, apart from that last part. I never fuck the girls. Might only be a casual job but I'm still a professional. I don't condemn anyone for doing it, it's just my line. Mind you, I have had to cut girls out of my rotation and direct them to other minders at times, not often but one or two. Temptation...
/r/TheRedPill12/02/16 11:00 AM
6

Nah its very common mate. Rank, but very common.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/16 10:35 AM
22

Most of my girls love it when a client nuts early. She still gets paid the same and doesn't have to do half as much work. And if she has a few of those a night she can take more bookings
/r/TheRedPill12/02/16 10:05 AM
6

I work in the sex trade. Its very common, most clients do it apparently. Can't understand it myself
/r/TheRedPill12/02/16 10:04 AM
1

Snap, ive got far less tolerance for the obese than most, and when they complain that I don't understand I whip out my pictures at 300+lbs
/r/TheRedPill22/01/16 09:13 PM
1

This. I do less core work now than I've ever done. Because I'm a lazy mofo, and tend to fall into the common trap of working the "mirror muscles" these days. But my abs are better than they have ever been because I've been eating far cleaner. Well... I was before Xmas anyway...
/r/MensRights02/01/16 05:21 PM
6

I dunno about that, I actually see her point on a superficial level, shes just missing the bigger picture. That being that it doesn't matter shit what his motivations are for wanting her to have a pleasurable experience, a pleasurable experience is the goal in and of itself. Is a person not allowed to take pride in their work? Because I know in my immediate circle a large number of women who take immense pride in their ability to give a good blowjobs. Some rather falsely I might add. Because the…
/r/MensRights21/12/15 12:14 PM
4

If a woman wants to fuck you, in most cases that is sufficient for her to believe she has entitlement to do so. She genuinely believes you dont have the right to deny her and if you do its either abuse, or you're gay, or you're fucking around (if you are in a relationship with her) The last time i turned down sex was 2 days ago. It lead to a 2 hour fight, and a frosty atmosphere the rest of the night, with tears. And this is despite the fact that i actually initially consented and only stopped i…
/r/MensRights14/12/15 10:24 AM
3

The wimmin who participate in prostitution are basically considered traitors. Because for as long as sex androids remain uninvented prostitutes are the only avenue for sex for men who aren't in the top 20% other than running beta game at great expense and risk, and continuing the process of fund transfers from men to women.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:59 AM
3

It weakens a woman's hegemony over the one thing no man can provide to another man. Pussy
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:56 AM
1

I dont think its always necessary to move on. Sometimes there are other assets that can be derived from continuing the engagement. Hot friends, social networking, social proof, fashion advice, personal shopper services, particularly if those are weak spots in your game to begin with. A small social circle is cancer for PUA. What is necessary, is to assess their value to your life, determine whether or not it is greater than the minimum maintenance level effort required to keep them around as a f…
/r/TheRedPill01/12/15 10:46 AM
1

It absolutely does depend on the level of intoxication, but theres a fairly wide band where it can have positive effects. I mean i know one situation i was in where she actually fell asleep on me, with the explicit instruction that i was to wake her up when i came to bed. Which i did. And this same girl who had been passive as a lamb the entire time i knew her, willing, very willing and clear in her consent both verbally and in writing (text messages before and after), but entirely passive, lite…
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 06:01 PM
2

I agree, but thats what i got. When i queried it further i was told "Ive been a criminal lawyer for 20 years, and i wouldn't like to think i was walking into a court room accusing a rape victim of rape" Ultimately they cant give citations, or reconcile it, because its completely at odds with sexual discrimination law, and equality before the law, but the system is designed to accommodate this inconsistency. Ultimately unless you wish to proceed with a private prosecution, a costly and complex pr…
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 05:46 PM
1

I absolutely agree quality over quantity is definitely key, otherwise frankly you are just overcompensating for your own insecurities by racking up a meaningless partner count inflated by lowering your own value. Only part i would somewhat disagree with is the quality of drunken sex. Sometimes, with some women, it can be better. Depends on the level of drunkenness involved i will grant you, but a lot of girls are simply too uptight to fully let go sober. I can recount a number of occasions where…
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 05:16 PM
2

People are going to downvote this but it really isnt bad advice. Hard to follow advice, certainly, but sound nonetheless. It seems to me almost a blue pill attitude to disregard this factor, the distinguishing characteristic for me between Red Pill and MRM, of schools which i subscribe partially to both, is that Red Pill is concerned with maximizing individual benefit within a system we accept to be crocked, and MRM is about attempting to piss into the wind changing a system that is highly unlik…
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 03:55 PM
3

Is drunk incapacity to consent the same standard as for drink driving? 80 milligrammes of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood, 35 microgrammes per 100 millilitres of breath or 107 milligrammes per 100 millilitres of urine. No, it remains as per R v Bree for the court to determine on the facts whether or not her intoxication was sufficient to vitiate any consent given. Can be at any BAC in theory, she could be halfway down a bottle of vodka and still judged to have consented, or 2 beers in and r…
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 03:49 PM
1

This, i always wished mine wouldnt bounce around quite so much, tends to pull itself out of their mouths quite a bit when stimulated.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 03:43 PM
1

With the greatest of respect to your indignation with this, and i share it, in theory this wont lead to increased convictions. Probably increased arrests, and investigations, but not convictions. These are investigatory guidelines issued to the police and CPS, they do not change the actual legal position on consent which is what will be dealt with at trial. R v Bree and the sexual offenses act 2003 still apply
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 03:39 PM
12

I was having a discussion recently with a girl about sexual assault. I have no doubt it happens a lot to women, especially as she stated, relatively lower level stuff like the hand on your ass as you pass in a bar, which while minor definitely still counts if its intentional and unsolicited. Probably at least as often as it happens to men if not more. But the difference between the two genders in terms of sexual assault is that while putting your hand on a girls ass in a bar is considered somewh…
/r/MensRights25/11/15 11:53 AM
1

This. Trust me, if you want to see this in action, attend a swingers club. Occasionally you will see an overweight guy with a slim girl. And you can tell in 99% of situations whether she's an escort or he's a sugar daddy. And its rarely any other. But well over half the couples have a weight disparity in favour of the female. Slim guy, fat girl. Men are sexual pragmatists. We adjust our expectations based on our options. Women, by and large, don't. Not until they get absolutely desperate.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 12:26 PM
2

I don't think it hurts them as bad as the customers, but its not ideal for them. Other than that I agree
/r/MensRights21/11/15 06:54 PM
5

If you want to sleep with women aged 17-28, looks are more important. If you want to sleep with women aged 28+ income is more important. An abundance of either will work though
/r/MensRights21/11/15 02:09 PM
–

Never gonna happen. We'll get the Swedish model. Pussy pass for the prostitute, jail for the John. Feminism will never allow anything that reduces their sexual capital. Cheap, clean regulated access to competitive pussy markets would dry up their supply of thirsty betas
/r/MensRights21/11/15 01:17 PM
7

That sadly is what passes for slim in the UK these days. For women anyway. Men are still fatties if they don't have dem abs
/r/MensRights20/11/15 08:35 PM
2

But dem women's rights to have their choices paid for!
/r/MensRights20/11/15 06:54 PM
5

It's a mystery bud, its almost as if the majority of women actually respond to that shit every day...
/r/MensRights20/11/15 06:30 PM
3

It is however, hilarious as a spectator sport
/r/MensRights20/11/15 06:28 PM
3

I dunno about that last sentence, I suspect if you laid "Jennifer Lawrence fans" and "Whiney white complaining women" out on a Venn diagram you would see near enough total overlap
/r/MensRights20/11/15 06:27 PM
1

He is? Damn, I suddenly feel hot as fuck...
/r/MensRights19/11/15 09:02 PM
–

In my admittedly anecdotal experience, female judges tend to be less swayed by feminine bullshit than males. Most male judges are old white knights, easy pickings for a damzeling, most female judges have heard and played out all this bullshit before
/r/MensRights19/11/15 07:21 PM
1

Assuming you could do that then men would have the advantage on the grounds that they could produce male or female offspring, whereas women would be limited to only producing females. I had wondered if this was the case, cant say i know a massive amount about genetics but when they first achieved this from the genetic material of two women i presumed at face value that in theory they couldn't produce a male since there would be no source for the Y Chromosone. I assumed i was probably being simpl…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 05:22 PM
1

Yeah you aren't wrong at all. And I also agree about RISUG. But to be honest I don't think it would even be that hard of a negotiation. In terms of artificial wombs anyway. In essence while women have always been the reproductive bottleneck, the real bottleneck isn't the number of ova, its the gestation time. With that factor removed, in reality the actual cost to a woman of donating a significant number of them is negligible, and I don't even forsee them being expensive. Men wont have to give u…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 02:41 PM
1

You think there won't be a market for such things? If women will take payment for sex, they will take payment for an ova. We just currently have nowhere to stick one other than in another uterus
/r/MensRights17/11/15 03:19 PM
1

The last time I posted a shirtless profile picture on a dating site it was suspended
/r/TheRedPill17/11/15 12:17 PM
1

It starts when Google Glass gets widespread adoption
/r/MensRights17/11/15 11:26 AM
1

It definitely was populated at one time, I recall reading it distinctly. But whether it's since been removed, I have no idea
/r/MensRights17/11/15 11:24 AM
1

Sad part is she'd probably get quite a few phone numbers doing that if she's anything more than minimally sexually viable
/r/MensRights17/11/15 11:24 AM
1

RegisterHer?
/r/MensRights17/11/15 11:21 AM
2

Ahh post-natal depression. The gold standard of excuses for entitled female bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 11:11 AM
1

Isn't one of the indicators of emotional abuse when your spouse deliberately isolates you from your friends ? Only when its the man, natch
/r/MensRights16/11/15 11:07 AM
1

They do, because they have very VERY low body fat. No real muscle to speak of
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 02:05 PM
1

Nicotine is a hell of an appetite suppressant. Its as much causation as correlation, if you smoke you simply dont want to eat as much. And you dont enjoy your food so much when you do. Smoking will generally make you skinnier. I know myself when im heavy on the nicotine i just dont feel the need to eat, i have to choose to eat. Its pretty easy to end up skinny this way. Nicotine has had more effect on my ability to shed weight than steroids, peptides and T3 combined
/r/TheRedPill14/11/15 08:34 PM
2

I disagree entirely, skinny is actually the optimum look for some target demographics. If you want to fuck teenagers, 17-21, the most successful build to do it is around 5'9, 130lbs, fashionable haircut and the right clothes. Being 6'3 and stacked will get you plenty of tail, but it wont be the teenage 10s, it will be the older demographics, 25+. The hottest, youngest women are after a One Direction lookalike, and muscle aint gonna cut it.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/15 08:11 PM
1

It's a hard mindset to get out of though. I manage it with some plates, not with others. And hotness doesn't seem to be the deciding factor. Some of them I really couldn't care less how many other guys they fuck, but I do have a 48 hour rule which they are made aware of at plating. Others I've grown involuntarily rather possessive over, and not really known why. Certainly I haven't wanted anything more than sex from them and yet it has bothered my ego when they have fucked other guys. I guess th…
/r/TheRedPill14/11/15 05:18 PM
1

Vulnerability is natural, unavoidable, and in many ways can be leveraged in a Machiavellian sense also, women are the masters of this but it can be done by men, if properly applied. But it needs to be controlled. You can let them see you fight your demons, but you can't ever let them see your demons break you.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/15 04:57 PM
5

This is the correct answer. The amount of times I've had tinder/POF based hookups or near hookups where she knows everything there is to know about me before I've even given her a second name is insane. Once a phone number is exchanged, certainly if you are running android, you will appear as a suggestion on her Facebook. For a time my 'people you may know' section was basically a rogues gallery of all the questionable tail I'd fucked in the past 24 months
/r/TheRedPill14/11/15 04:48 PM
14

That was the most depressing part. Realising that frankly some of these guys begging for pussy from these horrors have significantly more firepower than I do. Oh well, can't argue with results I guess, firepower or no, I'm happy with mine.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/15 04:12 PM
1

Agreed, the first 50lbs came off very easily. The rest much slower. Ideally I'd like another 25lbs or so off, which would take me to 190 @ 6'2. Currently 32" waist (from 44") 46" chest. Sadly I won't get into any smaller trousers, I'll be stuck at 32" because of my women's hips. In the last year my training has slipped badly, from 5-6 days a week to 1-2. Haven't really done too badly, managed to maintain most of my mass and even got a bit more fat off by eating a lot cleaner, but its time for a …
/r/TheRedPill13/11/15 07:57 PM
6

Having lost 82lbs myself, plus whatever I gained in muscle mass, probably about 30, its not as hard as its made out to be
/r/TheRedPill13/11/15 03:10 PM
1

Yeah I'm referring to UK law
/r/TheRedPill12/11/15 08:57 PM
1

Well his defence directly would never be defamatory, his defence fundamentally is just "She consented" What could be actionable however are allegations presented to support that argument or to merely outline the details of the alleged incident if they are in dispute. The nature of her alleged conduct. As for demonstrating damages it seems there has been a moderately recent change in the law since I covered defamation, so I will concede the point that yes she absolutely will have to demonstrate t…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/15 05:39 PM
1

Wow, as a resident I had no idea this was going on in the area. Frankly Durham is so small I tend to forget anyone on the Internet even knows it exists. Good work brother, look forward to hearing more about this. Would be interested in getting involved potentially in the future once my... "Public involvement"... with the Durham University student body is less prominent
/r/MensRights12/11/15 01:18 PM
2

Umm... Yes, it does... You can't rely upon your own breach of contract in persuit of a remedy for that breach
/r/MensRights12/11/15 12:49 PM
1

Depends really doesn't it If the defence is that she consented to straight up one-on-one intercourse, yeah she will struggle to demonstrate damages. If the defence is that she willingly participated in a 5 man gangbang with a passing rugby team while her boyfriend was blissfully unaware and her reputation is in tatters, it won't be that hard.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/15 09:18 AM
5

If i had the whiff of criminal compensation in my nostrils, and no morals, i'd be claiming he raped my ass too
/r/TheRedPill11/11/15 12:05 PM
3

Cant say im surprised, the theoretical possibility occurred to me when we covered defamation at law school, that given the reversed burdens of proof a valid defense of a rape allegation could easily be spun as a valid defamation case under the current law, and while its very easy (in theory) to introduce reasonable doubt to a criminal allegation, it is far harder to prove innocence to the extent that will be required to establish a truth defense to defamation. Particularly in an allegation where…
/r/TheRedPill11/11/15 12:02 PM
2

I don't make decisions when I'm mad. That's a rule I learned a long time ago. That's not a good thing! Beta level over 9000, there's beta and then there's omega... off the scale. The only part i disagree with in this post. You should never make a decision angry if you can avoid it. Of course the decision should in this case still be to leave, you should always get past the anger first.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/15 11:37 AM
12

Whilst I fully understand this line of thinking and it is correct, I still think it's a poor choice of title.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 03:37 PM
1

When feminism makes something a gendered issue, it demands a response. Lest we continue to allow them to control the narrative
/r/MensRights05/11/15 01:47 PM
3

Not from what I'm reading they aren't. It seems to be about 5-1 in favour of releasing her and giving her a knighthood at the moment. The comments truly are a representation of just how vile society and a large majority of women have become these days. My personal favourite being the one who basically said that no matter what the problems a mother has, drug user, murderer, whatever, they should have custody of their kids, not a father, because muh umbilical cord. Seriously.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 11:36 AM
2

Unwise. I have fairly low standards myself. Most of the ones with the bravery to approach are usually drunk off their ass.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:10 AM
1

Ever tried saying no to a girl who has put the required amount of pressure on herself to make the first move? Run Forest, run! Nah, as much as I do like the idea when it's someone I would have consented to anyway, women are far too often violent and abusive when refused for me to encourage their proactivity in this area. The fact that women are passive in this area saves me from a lot of undeserved slaps
/r/MensRights04/11/15 11:29 AM
1

I've had 3 or 4 in the last few years. Occupational hazard
/r/MensRights04/11/15 11:23 AM
1

And I suppose you're also the kind who believes that women who get pregnant by "backhanded" means ought still to be entitled to the full financial support of the father. Yes?
/r/MensRights04/11/15 11:22 AM
4

Rather like the all black recruitment campaigns the Metropolitan Police are so fond of
/r/MensRights03/11/15 02:48 PM
3

Thats because you are applying reason. Just switch it out for shrieking and pearl clutching and everything will become much clearer
/r/MensRights03/11/15 02:47 PM
-1

Meh, don't see the issue myself. If she doesn't want to give up the seat she should be under no obligation too. When I was fat I was probably carrying twice the weight this woman is, did you see me asking people to give up their seat?
/r/MensRights30/10/15 12:23 PM
2

Yet another reason I consider Thatcher the best PM this country has had since Atlee. Unpopular opinion in the UK but there it is.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 11:36 AM
33

Now, you say "But some women really do make every man wait because those women are looking only for serious relationships". And I say "What do those women look like?" I genuinely believe they don't exist. There are dates you will get an immediate fuck from, and dates you won't, but the determining factor isn't her chastity, its your SMV. If your SMV is high enough, she won't make you wait. It's just a matter of HOW high it needs to be to pass that threshold for her. It's a matter of degree, not …
/r/TheRedPill30/10/15 09:39 AM
5

It'll be no better than when Panorama covered the issue last year. Yeah, they mentioned female perpetrators. It was about a 3 minute section, and dealt with lesbian relationships. Number of male victims discussed or interviewed: Zero
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:35 PM
1

Of course, in reality, the amount of women who get attacked for rejecting men is an overwhelming minority. And probably significantly less than the number of men who get attacked for rejecting women. I know ive been physically attacked a couple of times, and verbally attacked pretty much every time
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:33 PM
1

Fatalist id agree entirely. Poor frame... I don't know about that, I think part of maturing is accepting to live with being imperfect and with the fact that life isn't always fair. And hook up culture isn't. It's lopsided and it always will be. And ultimately as you allude to, fatalism suggests that we cannot control any actions but our own. For as long as men are prepared to "date down" in hook ups, women will always have the capacity to date up. And since I cant stop other men doing that, all …
/r/MensRights26/10/15 01:13 PM
1

Who wouldn't date a 7? Any woman above a 6.5. But really Tinder isn't for dating is it, its for hook ups and female validation. If you want to date you go to POF. Realistically on Tinder a man has to bat generally about 3 points downwards. Naturally that becomes less so as he approaches 10. But a 7 guy isn't gonna do better than a 5 on Tinder.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 12:45 PM
1

Having low SMV is only marginally changeable, and Tinder is for 9s and 10s. Genetic factors don't change just because you drop a few weights sessions into your routine and change your hair, in terms of SMV I've had one of the biggest self improvement spells of anyone I've known. From a 2 to a solid 7.5-8. But beyond this I can't go any further. I already get compliments on my body, I'm already decent looking, but I can't ever go any further, ive reached my max and this guy might well be the same…
/r/MensRights26/10/15 10:06 AM
3

This, it only works once there is someone to fight, outside of that men are actually far more cooperative.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 01:10 PM
2

Except if you are gay or trans. Biology don't real... Most of the time
/r/MensRights24/10/15 11:04 AM
1

Asians in their 20s are pretty hot. Not sure I'd be complaining haha
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 03:38 PM
1

... This will help him how?
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:32 PM
2

In my experience being around a drunk girl who wants to fuck you, whether you are sober or not, is a universally bad idea. Because if she initiates you either get to be considered a rapist for letting her, or get assaulted for stopping her.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:22 PM
–

Not taking away the seriousness of rape, or its abhorrence as an offense, but this really isn't that surprising. Let's call a it like it is, horrific offense yes, but it also frankly ties in with the majority of female sexual fantasy. The domination, loss of control, having power exerted over them. It's the same tired trope over and over again because frankly it's damn near hard wired. Throw a shoe in any crowded area and you've got a good chance of hitting a woman with these exact sexual fantas…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 06:12 PM
3

A man in his sleep will get an erection. And then wake up and need a piss at the same time. FTFY
/r/MensRights16/10/15 06:07 PM
1

How is his point invalid on either statement? She was offered the same as the murderer, she elected not to take it.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 12:47 PM
5

From my research for a paper on this subject for the 2nd year of my law degree, as a student going in with an accepted pro-capital punishment bias - No, sadly the figures don't bear that out. Not unless you drastically reduce the safeguards in place. And I don't think anyone sane really wants that
/r/MensRights01/10/15 12:43 PM
–

And id agree with you on that also, hence my statement that prima facie it absolutely reeks. On the face of it, its more likely than not she was trying to trap him. But, if im reading it right she did also go out and purchase condoms once she realized that calculating ovulation was going to be too much of a fuck on, so while its not conclusive evidence, id say shes just about done enough to earn herself some benefit of the doubt. Doesnt make her any the less of an unreasonable harpie for refusin…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 08:57 AM
3

The fact is the loss of control defence doesn't make allowances for the special characteristics of the victim. Adultery for example is not valid grounds. It has to be a legitimate loss of control caused by the victims immediate actions. This woman sought a weapon, travelled to the victims home, and then killed him, based upon even in her own words, his smirk and refusal to admit his crimes. That is not a valid LoC defense. This is a pussypass, plain and simple. Now, in this case do I actually th…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 08:37 AM
–

I don't know about that, her explanation is plausible. I've had a girl behave exactly the same way and get pregnant accidentally who then terminated without informing me until after the event. So she sure as shit wasn't trying to get pregnant. But even if she is genuine in her explanation, it doesn't make his fears any less genuine or reasonable. Prima facie it stinks to high heaven
/r/MensRights30/09/15 08:23 AM
1

Ding Ding Ding Its much harder to go off for 2 years of "Finding yourself" (Translation: 2 years of gallivanting, virtue signaling bullshit work on some villagers well, and having awkward fumbling sex on a futon with someone who doesn't speak a word of your language nor you his) when you have noone bankrolling you. And be it mummy & daddy, the state or the eventual husband coughing up to pay her credit cards off, someone is usually bankrolling these types
/r/MensRights27/09/15 02:55 PM
2

Ive always said this to partners of mine, and people can call me a sociopath, an abuser or whatever they want, I'm just realistic about my own nature. There are pretty much no circumstances which would lead me to raise my hand to a woman and strike her. I may push her off in self defence, but I would never strike. Sexual infidelity, financial robbery, demeaning and dehumanising behaviour, I'll just leave. I won't stand for it, but I won't respond wrongly. But if I find out a child I've been allo…
/r/MensRights27/09/15 01:20 PM
1

Ah right, yeah I wasn't taking that part into account. Good point well made
/r/MensRights24/09/15 05:23 PM
–

Well I'm not sure it is. The question of "Would he/she have consented sober" is kind of the crux of this. Of course the attractiveness of the person is a factor, if they are reasonably attractive then the person MAY be genuinely consenting and would have done sober, so the friends will be less inclined to intervene, but if they are a 50 year old swamp monster they almost certainly wouldn't. Women practice this as much as men. Not just for attractiveness of course. The amount of marriages tempora…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 02:36 PM
–

Your friends intervening to stop you doing something you will later regret is a bad thing now?
/r/MensRights24/09/15 11:21 AM
3

Umm... How is being charming while having a long sexual history "Rape by dishonesty" An inconceivably huge leap I'd say, unless you can back it up with anything other than feminist newspeak
/r/MensRights24/09/15 11:20 AM
1

Do you have kids? Well I'm tired of my niece, fancy a swap?
/r/MensRights21/09/15 09:19 AM
1

Does it? I've seen a lot of cases posted around where young girls have created images of themselves in the same way. It is never them that are prosecuted, its their (also children) boyfriends. Until its equal in practice rather than theory, its a men's rights issue
/r/MensRights21/09/15 09:13 AM
3

Assuming Australia has similar positions on this matter to the UK (Which is likely since they derive their common law from ours) there are limits to what degree of harm a person can consent to upon themselves before that consent is negated. Its more complex than this, but in laymans terms you can consent to a simple battery, but you cant consent to actual bodily harm or above. This mans injuries would certainly seem to be "calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim" and "mo…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 02:39 PM
3

Surely a curtain could have been drawn... i applaud the efforts of the developers... but the visual reality is rather... unedifying is it not?
/r/MensRights15/09/15 08:41 AM
1

Shes basically seen that the shitstorm from this hasnt gone entirely her way and decided that rather than backtrack and lose face she'll double down on the misandry and hope to gain some additional traction outside her echo chamber. And it hasnt really worked because every the average person, with a fair degree of ingrained misandry, will see this horse shit for what it is
/r/MensRights10/09/15 09:22 PM
37

Absolutely because male genital mutilation just doesnt happen at a fraction of the rate of female genital mutilation, owing to it being illegal and all. Oh wait...
/r/MensRights10/09/15 09:09 PM
–

There are no feminists on a sinking ship. True in 1912, true in 2015
/r/MensRights10/09/15 03:30 PM
–

Why the fuck is this legal? None of this is to say that it isnt a good idea to cooperate with an investigation of a serious crime, of course it is, and were i one of the men at that school/in that area, yes, i would volunteer my sample since its easier than proving an alibi. But the idea that the state should be able to demand this from an entire demographic on the basis of investigating a crime that as yet has no suspect, no. Just fucking no.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 03:25 PM
2

Seems to vary by social demographic however. At least here. Middle class people are definitely putting off having kids till later, professionals in my experience rarely have them before their very late 20s/early 30s. Working/under class people, usually having them the minute they can attract the local "bad boy" to knock them up because its a ticket to a better class of benefits dependency
/r/MensRights10/09/15 03:07 PM
6

Im waiting for the punchline... Dont leave me hanging man!
/r/MensRights10/09/15 10:01 AM
3

Absolutely, you cant punish someone for throttling their partner HALF to death, otherwise where is the incentive for them to stop before they kill them? We need to be giving a free ride to extreme violence, lest it become murder!
/r/MensRights10/09/15 09:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter