TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mulerider Archive

View 19 posts and 31 comments by mulerider on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
484

mulerider/r/MensRights18/12/14 11:39 PM
199

Outragemulerider/r/MensRights18/12/14 11:32 PM
190

WBBmulerider/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:19 PM
163

False Accusationsmulerider/r/MensRights04/01/15 01:11 AM
69

Outragemulerider/r/MensRights09/02/15 05:10 PM
65

False Accusationmulerider/r/MensRights01/07/15 07:21 AM
57

Blogs/Videomulerider/r/MensRights17/11/14 08:42 PM
56

Discriminationmulerider/r/MensRights08/01/15 05:32 AM
55

Newsmulerider/r/MensRights18/02/15 08:11 PM
22

mulerider/r/MensRights09/11/14 10:24 AM
22

Edu./Occu.mulerider/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:54 PM
20

Outragemulerider/r/MensRights14/01/15 09:21 PM
16

Outragemulerider/r/MensRights17/02/15 06:21 PM
15

Discriminationmulerider/r/MensRights18/02/15 08:13 PM
10

Blogs/Videomulerider/r/MensRights22/11/14 02:50 AM
10

Action Op.mulerider/r/MensRights08/01/15 04:14 PM
8

WBBmulerider/r/MensRights13/01/15 06:01 PM
1

Questionmulerider/r/MensRights17/11/14 08:36 PM
0

Feminismmulerider/r/MensRights27/07/15 08:46 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

"...The woman said that her former husband was 'a good father, but at times he doesn’t realise that he is affecting the children. I want my kids to have a chance of a normal life.'..." She's cheating on their father... But he's the one who's 'affecting the children'... Where does this woman get off?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/16 01:48 PM
10

CARTER: Yes, you do. I believe in you. Did you delete the messages? Awareness of criminal activity, during said activity, is an admission of guilt. Prosecute her to the fullest extent of the law.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 09:31 PM
2

Exactly. A man might be very attracted to a woman and aroused by the situation, and still not want sex. You don't even need to be attracted to the woman to get an erection. The vast majority of heterosexual men are so instinctively primed for sex that most eroticism directed towards them will result in arousal, (unless the woman is Whoopi Goldberg-esque). Talk about feeling betrayed by your own body (sound familiar?)
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:41 AM
0

The actual video was created by Mark Dice, a conservative who's famous for baiting the progressive, liberal, or just ignorant viewpoint into signing ludicrous petitions. He is also an unashamed conspiracy theorist. Which is why I find it kind of odd that you're bashing both the site, infowars, and my title, but not the video itself when it is tautological to the article.... Go figure?
/r/MensRights28/07/15 05:23 AM
2

^ I laughed way too hard at that
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:26 PM
-1

They are largely synonymous. In this case, 'repetitive' is considered correct because "suicide deaths" is tautological. 'Redundant' would also be correct, but not more so.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:14 PM
2

"Suicide deaths" would be repetitive.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 09:19 AM
1

Haha, no, I can't figure out if you were replying to me or not. Stupid reddit didn't send me a notification
/r/MensRights30/04/15 09:09 AM
1

Who are you talking to?
/r/MensRights30/04/15 09:00 AM
2

I thought we were talking about depressed women and suicidal men, are you changing the subject? But okay, let's talk about this. a.) Inequality is not about one side having something at the other sides expense. It is literally and simply, when the two sides are unequal. Example: The ratio of men to women in STEM fields is 3:1. Despite the fact that female applicants get preferential attention, it is still considered an inequality because the numbers are skewed. b.) The sexism exists in society's…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 01:28 AM
2

Once again, so what? What's the significance of depressed women, compared to men who are killing themselves? Next you'll be telling me that driving through a bad neighborhood is equitable to getting mugged.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 12:26 AM
5

So what? If women don't complete it then they have a 100% better chance of seeking and getting help than their dead, male counterparts. This isn't an "almost" statistic, it's about who's killing themselves or not, and right now it's mostly men.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 11:46 PM
1

I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:28 PM
1

Do yourself a favor and google 'sequence of tenses', I'm surprised your fifth grade teacher never taught you these. Get a life, I'm done talking to you.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 06:40 PM
1

You don't understand English whatsoever, do you? Substitute the sentence you quoted for any sentence with similar syntax and a specific time frame and you'll have a sentence that makes sense. You got confused because you never actually read my responses and therefore, assumed that I was talking about the present rather than the 1970's. I don't have time to waste like you apparently do. Also, you seem to have a very limited exposure to the English language if you "expect people to keep consistent…
/r/MensRights17/01/15 08:08 AM
1

Where exactly are you seeing an 'is' that needs to be a 'did'? Since your very first reply, the topic we were discussing was the executions of the male murderers who were convicted between 1977 and 1987. Everything that you and I were talking about from the beginning was in reference to my original comment. For you to not be able to draw the parallel between the topic we were discussing and the citations I gave falls on a level of mental retardation. Soo, you're saying that my post has the amoun…
/r/MensRights17/01/15 06:54 AM
1

I did. This is obviously going nowhere. You're angry because you couldn't make a simple connection between point A and point B so you're going to blame someone else (regardless of how correct they are) for your shortcomings. Real. Fucking. Mature. How about you stop being an egotistical idiot and learn how to accept being wrong.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 06:09 AM
1

Not at all! If you were following what I was saying, and actually had an understanding of the English language, you would have clearly seen that every statement I made about Texans' opinions or capital punishment was referential to my original argument. That is a very lousy excuse for trying to argue with someone without first educating yourself on his standpoint.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 05:48 AM
1

Wow... when you argue with someone, you're expected to READ what they've posted. In every single one of my comments, I've been comparing male murderers convicted between 1977 and 1987, and this female who was convicted in 1985. Any other study but the one I cited would be irrelevant to my argument. I cannot believe this kind of stupidity exists.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 05:34 AM
1

https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=61792 Like I said, it really doesn't matter what you think when it comes to capital punishment. The point I was making with this post is that all the male murderers got the full sentence as deemed worthy by the state; but this woman, who arguably committed one of the most horrendous mass killings in Texas, got a favorable sentence and an early release for no apparent reason other than being a woman.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 04:56 AM
1

The ideas of morals and justice vary from person to person. It seems that you misread what I wrote, I said: "regardless of YOUR moral standpoints". I couldn't care less if you think the male prisoners executions were "rightful", because the majority of people in Texas think they were. If the majority of Texans think capital punishment is just, then it's only right that they got punished to the fullest extent of the law (in that state) for the horrendous crimes that they committed. What's infuria…
/r/MensRights17/01/15 03:26 AM
1

http://murderpedia.org/usa/texas.htm Find me one that wasn't. And yes, rightfully. Regardless of your moral standpoint on capital punishment, they paid the just consequences (deemed worthy by the state) for the crimes that they committed.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 03:15 PM
4

This is infuriating considering the fact that every male serial killer convicted between 1977 and 1987 in Texas was quickly and rightfully sentenced to death. But not this female, BABY serial killer? And now she's scheduled for RELEASE?
/r/MensRights14/01/15 09:23 PM
2

I sent them an email telling them I would now buy exclusively from their competitor, AMD, because of this decision.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 05:56 AM
3

Good job spotting that!
/r/MensRights09/01/15 05:24 AM
11

I gave up on 'The Huffington Post' a looong time ago. All of their articles have nauseatingly blatant biases, and their founder (Adrianna Huffington) is a figurehead of the neo-feminist movement.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 05:39 AM
2

Wow, if you had actually READ the article instead of wildly throwing insults at the Republicans here, you would have seen that the Republicans were in the right all along. Since you're obviously having difficulty reading this, let me narrow it down for you to the paragraph that explains your question: "Republicans have said the bill is simply a Democratic ploy to distract from the disappointment of Affordable Health Care; that it's been against the law to pay a woman less than a man with similar…
/r/MensRights05/01/15 01:40 PM
2

While I couldn't agree with you more that a study would be nice (and I found quite a few while browsing for these links), my point in making this post was to show how many false rape NEWS STORIES I could still find even when you consider how: Few news conglomerates find it newsworthy to report on false rape accusations Many false rape accusations have yet to be uncovered In the ones that do get uncovered, the punishment of the false accuser is so menial that it doesn't merit a news article/story…
/r/MensRights04/01/15 01:11 PM
15

The problem is that feminists would disagree that very many women, if any at all, file false rape accusations; and if they do, it's not as disconcerting as real rape. To them, "rape is a life threatening wound to society, whereas, false rape accusations are just a broken finger; which would the doctor operate on first?" This, of course, is almost as stupid an analogy as the "10% percent of the M&M's are poisonous" one.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 01:30 AM
12

It's a ploy for unprotected sex and, subsequently, genuine pregnancy.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 12:45 AM
52

You're taking the flair way too literally. Reverse the genders as in; a man using deception (of any sort) as a tool to get his SO to feel obligated to stay with him. The whole point of this ploy is to scam the man into having unprotected sex with his "already pregnant SO" so that she can become impregnated with his child for real.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 12:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter