TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mushybees Archive

View 1 posts and 271 comments by mushybees on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
100

Opinionmushybees/r/MensRights15/03/15 09:27 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Remember Digg.com?
/r/MensRights18/12/21 09:16 AM
4

He probably pulled it
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/20 05:37 PM
0

Well of course its false. There arent any female led construction companies.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 10:27 AM
3

WANT.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:18 PM
4

Raped once.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 07:56 PM
153

Lets have a quota, they said. Fifty percent women and 15 percent non white they said. By 2020 they said. Might have to sack some white men for no other reason than they're white, and men, though. hashtag equality.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 05:10 PM
1

too true, and too often
/r/MensRights31/08/16 08:43 PM
1

Well what they used to do was get married, and then the husband and wife became like a 'team', where they complemented, reinforced and supported each other through the rest of their lives. A partnership, of two people of equal dignity, who made up for each others weaknesses with their own strengths. Sadly, this is not the way relationships are anymore
/r/MensRights31/08/16 06:16 PM
0

From your own post; "in that case a man should have an opt out". We don't. We can't. Its just not feasible. If you're a believer in "equality", then either men need to be allowed financial abortion, or women need to be prevented biological abortion. Me? I don't even believe in equality.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 12:05 AM
4

There are ways to make it fair; there's just no way to make it equal.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 12:01 AM
18

Equality
/r/MensRights30/08/16 11:59 PM
1

Could try reserving judgement till you've actually seen the damn thing
/r/MensRights08/07/16 10:04 AM
8

Definitely rich. Makes everything else easier, including attracting women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 08:00 AM
1

You're right, but seeing as we don't have sex only within marriages, and couldn't enforce a policy that decreed it, we have no remaining choice but to look at the incentives we create with our public policy, and try to adjust those incentives to bring about the change we seek. I for one would prefer a society with fewer single mothers, I don't think its good for children to grow up without a father, and the stats support me, kids with two parents have a massively lower rate of criminality, drug …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 10:26 PM
1

A rare case of logic on the internet. Well said.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 10:18 PM
1

I don't think ridicule has even taken place here, the media still refuse to print her name so I don't even know who she is
/r/MensRights09/02/16 10:16 PM
1

Treat all weapons as loaded, treat all irons as hot, treat all women as potential false accusers. Protect yourself, and enjoy spending time with women of quality.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 10:14 PM
1

That's it, people (women in this case) make very different decisions when there's a price attached that they have to pay, as compared to the decisions they make when the cost is borne by someone else. It's not often enough taken into account
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 10:09 PM
21

Think of it in terms of the incentives created, rather than the intentions. If the situation were such that women weren't entitled to money from the father, and the welfare state didn't exist, how many of those pregnant would choose to carry to term? The reason we have the explosion of single mothers over the past few decades is because we created financial incentives for women to choose this path. There's no predetermined amount of single mothers out there, and people make choices. How about we…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 12:34 PM
1

6,3,4,5,3,3.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 05:33 PM
1

It is a thing, when you show up to a social event with a hot girl (whether you've paid for the night or not), the other girls there find you attractive. Guys are much more individualistic when it comes to girls. Girls need more social approval.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/15 11:17 PM
1

In the UK, to charge someone with harassment they have to have done something which a 'reasonable' person (ie a jury) thinks would make the recipient fear for their safety. Afaik, in Canada they're trying to remove the reasonable person part and make it so that if a 'victim' feels harassed, then they are. Which is stupid. That's probably why this case is taking so long, it will set a precedent one way or the other.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 12:11 PM
1

yup. it's one issue I disagree with him on, the other being atheism. and that's okay too.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 11:50 PM
9

She did try to get them to not ban her from teaching forever by blaming it on her ex husband being a meany
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/15 10:52 PM
8

Would only be 'attempting to pervert the course of justice' if she'd told police, lying to a charity isn't a crime. Most the cops could do was caution her. Shame.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/15 10:50 PM
288

It's not failure to support false accusers that hurts real victims, it's false accusers that hurt real victims. Supporting a false accuser because 'it's happened to other people and I want them to be believed' is not only immoral, it's counter productive. This woman is an idiot with an ideology.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 02:19 PM
0

oh, it's not confusion. it's a pretty transparent attempt to tar MRA's with the same brush as PUA's. good job nobody reads this idiot's output.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:23 PM
2

duckduckgo gives me https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_pill_and_blue_pill
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:43 PM
15

They don't, the film has nothing to do with the TRP subreddit, other than a common reference to the film the matrix
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:21 PM
1

you can do it without needing stats or sources, pure logic will do: 'of course it's true that men and women earn different amounts of money. what's not true is that men and women earn different amounts of money for the same work. how could they? men and women don't do the same work. how many male primary school teachers do you know? how many female bricklayers? men and women, taken as a whole, work different jobs, for different amounts of hours. they choose different subjects to study, they take…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 01:52 AM
2

she might mean that women get assaulted more often by their male partners than men do by their female partners. difficult to prove this wrong since most of the time women assaulting their male partners goes unrecorded in the stats, while instances of reciprocal violence usually result in arrest for the man and a caution for the woman. on the severity point, when women want to kill or seriously injure their male partners, they're much more likely to use a third party (a boyfriend or acquaintance,…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 01:41 AM
25

Or trans
/r/MensRights19/10/15 06:56 PM
2

When you don't have a welfare state, people who can't afford to have children don't have them. When you have a situation like the current one in the UK, young girls from poor backgrounds are incentivized to have children and become single mothers because of the massive amounts of benefits the government will pay out to subsidise that choice.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 06:48 PM
2

Back in the day, if a girl got pregnant and the father was not known, the girl's parents would support her and the child. This is why it was taboo to have sex out of wedlock, it imposed costs on parents, so parents -especially mothers- taught their daughters that sex outside of marriage was shameful. Something something personal responsibility something welfare state etc
/r/MensRights19/10/15 12:26 PM
3

it's kind of a big subject there, buddy ;) i'd recommend /u/girlwriteswhat's youtube videos (youtube) as she goes into a lot of historical detail and actually does her research. for balance, read the feminism subreddit and keep an open mind. though i'd suggest you use a separate account if you're going to post there to avoid being banned :D
/r/MensRights24/09/15 09:16 PM
1

an hour and a half is really not enough time, and the quality of the debaters was abysmal on both sides. i guess we know why these people are law teachers and not lawyers. if they were any good at making a convincing argument they'd be partners in law firms instead.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:43 PM
10

You have to look at it from the point of view of the people making the decisions, and their incentives and motivations. What matters to a politician is not the facts, or the actual outcomes of a given course of action, but rather what people believe, or the intended outcomes. Then a lot of political decision making comes into focus.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 04:02 PM
1

no, there were a few nutjob quacks, usually christian, that liked to say they could get rid of the gay, but only a very few idiots actually took them seriously. and even that sort of anti-gay sentiment has only existed for a couple hundred years, if you go back to before the middle ages everyone was buggering each other left right and center. nothing wrong with being a homo. just like there's nothing wrong morally with someone who feels their body is the incorrect gender for their brain. they're…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/09/15 09:02 PM
1

in what way is having an opinion you disagree with being a bigot? i don't regard transfolk with hatred or intolerance, i'm a very tolerant person. I just think there are better ways of dealing with mental illness than letting people chop their bits off. If a guy decides his leg doesn't feel like it is his own leg, do we call him 'trans-disabled' and allow a surgeon to chop his leg off? or do we give him drugs and therapy?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/09/15 08:44 PM
1

Of course :D
/r/PussyPassDenied04/09/15 06:09 AM
7

You'll note I didn't say I was of that opinion, I merely stated that if one were then saying that might seem reasonable. Don't assume.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/15 06:55 PM
1

They want representation, they need to make good points, make sense, have internally logically consistent arguments, and be entertaining. You don't get the TV show or newspaper column by flinging poo at the incumbent.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/15 02:41 PM
5

Depends, if you're of the opinion that transgenderism is a form of mental illness that would be better treated with drugs and therapy, rather than encouraging their delusions and silencing anyone who disagrees with you, then referring to someone with the pronouns of their birth gender might seem reasonable...
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/15 02:39 PM
3

I'd rather take an inch off the end of my penis with a cheesegrater, and its not like I have an inch to spare...
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/15 02:26 PM
11

Our top story this evening, man charged with assault for facepalming too hard...
/r/MensRights03/09/15 11:59 AM
2

I catcall all the time, but not in a 'hey let me suck on them titties' kind of way, more of a 'good afternoon, beautiful' sort of confident, even debonair fashion. I get a lot of smiles, a fair few 'good afternoon to you too sweetcheeks' and the occasional number. And then sometimes you get that look like you're something they just scraped off their shoe. I'd say better than 50/50 positive responses, with actually getting a date at around 5%. If it didn't work, we wouldn't do it
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 05:53 AM
1

The general trend seems to be that guys will more often choose the 60-hour job. Maybe people just make bad decisions? For a given value of bad
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 05:27 AM
1

...maintaining relationships with attractive women ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 05:25 AM
3

no, i'd like to see women have a little more self respect, the confidence to ask a guy out once in a while, the wisdom to know they're not going to change the chad that they're being plated by, the courage to take responsibility for their own decisions and actions, in short, they have to be worthy of my effort in securing their commitment. just like it is for guys. equality, ho!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/15 11:20 AM
8

Far as I can tell, TRP is the response to the way women are. Get women to change.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/15 09:55 AM
1

Face is cute but not stunning, sure. But body? 10/10 would eat
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/15 09:53 AM
1

British. We don't have Victoria's secret here, we have -shudder- ann summers
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/15 09:52 AM
1

ever had a girl suck your cock? did she need therapy or relocation? just get it in there, get the job done and get paid. millions of people do it every day all over the world
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 10:41 PM
1

by 'models' i mean fashion models, the catwalk, too thin, high cheekbones models who aren't all that attractive to men. victoria's secret models are more towards glamour models, like page three girls or playboy girls, these are more curvy and more attractive to men. miranda kerr is the former, yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 07:28 PM
1

would you do it for a billion? yes? everything else is just haggling over the price
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 02:22 PM
10

compare, say, keira knightley who is too skinny, no boobs, just a pretty face, with this post from /realgirls less pretty face than our kiera, but absolutely bang on 10/10 body. Humans are supposed to have some body fat, but it should be a thin, evenly spread layer all over. for the ladies, a little extra over the boobs and butt is great, but for both sexes, a spare tyre or extra folds is less than ideal. so yes, it's the leanness/lack of body fat that makes her too skinny. you'd have to ask you…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 08:49 AM
10

Yup, too thin for me anyway. Great for modelling clothes for a photoshoot, but not very sexually attractive. And it is an unflattering picture of her face
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 08:09 AM
1

To suck a cock? I'd do it for sixteen grand, and I'm a straight male
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 08:05 AM
12

Yeah she's maybe a 7. Models aren't usually all that attractive though, they're just thin. Like really thin. Which is what the designers and fashion editors and so on are looking for. To sell clothes and shit to women. Not what guys are looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 07:53 AM
1

irons as well. and treat all microphones as live. basic self-protection stuff. if you can learn these things from your parents, or learn from other people's mistakes, great. if you have to learn the hard way, unlucky.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 09:36 PM
1

a cynic is what an idealist calls a realist ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 03:22 PM
2

it's actually true in the UK that muslims of pakistan origin are responsible for at least a third of all the rapes that occur, despite being less than 5% of the population. Its statistically significant yet anyone who tries to raise the question in the MSM is branded 'bigot' or 'islamophobe' and shouted down. It's political correctness gone mad is what it is.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 04:43 PM
2

he defends white males because he sees how white males have become the scapegoat for everyone else's problems these days. how about people start to look at themselves first, try to see what they're doing to help themselves, before trying to pin the blame on 'old white males' because they're currently the group who own most of the stuff
/r/MensRights06/08/15 04:39 PM
3

title not entirely accurate. maybe make your title a text part and edit the title to describe what the article is actually about
/r/MensRights27/07/15 08:34 AM
5

excellent. less paternity fraud
/r/MensRights26/07/15 08:13 PM
1

Oh I agree, absolutely, but not in this particular case
/r/MensRights23/07/15 11:44 PM
1

She gave him 1.8m so he wouldn't drag it through the courts. Or her lawyers did.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 11:43 PM
1

In this particular case, he was a drug dealer before they even met, and he voluntarily left her and didn't attempt to see his kids for two years, just took a couple million quid and walked out on them. It's only over the last year he's wanted to see his kids
/r/MensRights23/07/15 06:02 PM
0

Oh I can see the point, but I think f4j shouldn't be using her as an example, she's a good woman
/r/MensRights23/07/15 03:28 PM
0

No. Myleene's a good girl who is protecting her kids from a sack of shit gold digging drug dealer who walked out on his kids on christmas fucking day. At most you could accuse her of poor judgement in getting involved with the guy in the first place. I normally support F4J but using Myleene on this ad is, in my opinion, out of order. There are genuine cases of good fathers being prevented from seeing their kids, but this is not one of them.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 09:11 AM
2

Came here to say this. Also Google 'stipulative definition'
/r/MensRights22/07/15 12:48 AM
1

I thought myleene was a good lass? More information required.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 09:42 PM
1

our opponents' shaming tactics are a weapon, you don't beat the weapon by giving it ammunition.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 09:13 PM
0

that's not provocative, that's the kind of crap that gets MRAs a bad name. women do not owe us sex. take that shit to manhood academy, we don't to be associated with it.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 09:09 PM
6

Ms. Renda was a UVa. student and outspoken rape victim advocate who held several positions in Charlottesville since 2011 to combat the problem of sexual assault. held several positions? ah i see. so it's like her whole career is based upon making rape be seen as a bigger and more prevalent problem than it really is? i wonder if the same is true for the thousands of other "victims' advocates" out there?
/r/MensRights20/07/15 08:40 PM
1

Every story I see on this seems to be getting closer and closer to the truth. It's a nice trend
/r/MensRights20/07/15 10:58 AM
11

From what I've read on the subject, companies that hire and promote on merit who also coincidentally have a lot of diversity tend to do better (probably because they're going on merit) while companies with no diversity tend to do a little worse. However, companies who ignore merit and hire based on quotas do worst of all.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 10:56 AM
1

I've kinda lost track of the conversation here. What are we talking about again?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 04:05 PM
1

because everyone represents themselves as more interesting than they actually are in the first weeks of a new relationship, if you do the whole 'be yourself' thing, you risk looking like you're even less interesting than you really are. yes, i'm saying you should present yourself in the best possible light at the start of a relationship. i myself don't advocate actual lying, i don't think that's the way to go about it, think of it more like a two week job interview, where you're both feeling eac…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 03:00 PM
1

Not at all. Usually by the two year mark they're starting to talk about 'settling down.' I think there's some kind of fairytale they're imagining where it's happy ever after, but so far I haven't found one that I can really say is 'The One' 'just be yourself' is the worst dating advice. if you were that interesting you wouldn't be dating :D I'm not saying you should lie to people but at the very least try to act like you're confident and comfortable and genuinely interested in the other person. …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 02:08 PM
2

why would you want to have someone like that in your life? because until i found out she'd been cheating, i was happy. subsequent experience, as well as reflecting on previous interactions, have confirmed to me that the standard terrible dating advice your mother gives you (be yourself, be sensitive, don't be afraid to show your emotions, always respect a woman and put her needs first etc) will turn off most women. maybe once they're pushing 35 and they think they're running out of time you can …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 06:33 AM
3

the golf club was his, it just happened to be in a bagful of golf clubs in the hallway. i didn't take it there with me
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 04:46 AM
6

how often? three times total, in my life. two are above, the third was unrelated to women. irrational though? not sure i'd call it that. you can be angry and do violence while retaining the capacity for rational thought
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 04:43 AM
7

isn't there always? feel free to ask if you're curious about any details
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 03:28 AM
5

apparently they decided it was just 'out of date' and they would help her to update it...
/r/MensRights19/07/15 02:22 AM
2

Do you think that being RP is attractive specifically to the girls that are desperate for approval I think that being aware, being 'unplugged' as it were, is probably attractive to everyone, men and women alike, due to the bedrock of confidence you possess when you know nobody can ever hurt you again, because you won't let them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 02:18 AM
2

fucking called it.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 01:53 AM
14

So, there was this girl... I know, right? Me 19, her 18, four years together. I'm there working, she's studying. I work nights. I'm kind, caring, compassionate, devoted. She's cute, smart, loves me to bits. I find out from a friend one night that she's out partying. No problem, right? I work nights, five nights a week, she's not chained to my bed or anything, she goes to college during the day while i'm sleeping, she comes to my place, we have great sex, I go to work, I finish work and go home a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 01:33 AM
2

we need to start a male slutwalk, where we all go topless, with 'my erection is not my consent' painted on our bodies. people need to be educated about this shit
/r/MensRights17/07/15 12:42 PM
1

heh.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 12:42 PM
3

Yeah I've been waiting for further developments for what seems like a year now, it just seems so blatantly obvious what happened here, I can't believe it even came before a judge
/r/MensRights15/07/15 08:10 AM
31

if this goes the wrong way i'm writing off canada as a lost cause. never was there so clear cut a case of feminists abusing the system to punish someone for disagreeing with them
/r/MensRights15/07/15 05:37 AM
1

http://archive.is/9lpiS full report at: http://www.gov.scot/resource/0039/00391828.pdf edit: my bad, 180 places not 80
/r/MensRights14/07/15 04:10 PM
1

ah i see, sorry i've been hanging out in /r/changemyview so i didn't get the sarcasm. this is why i said make sure you get affirmative consent beforehand meaning get it on the tape. as long as they're fully awake and alert, and clearly not under duress, and then they're an active participant during, then you should be ok
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:31 PM
1

no i haven't watched it, but i thought that nungesser was innocent? some porno she makes as an 'art project' isn't the true facts of the case, or even a factual account of the events of the evening, it's just a porno
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:16 PM
1

whooosh
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:03 PM
1

ah! true lies. ty.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 11:10 AM
1

what kind of a woman takes the ice cube trays out of the freezer‽ what film is that from? eidt: true lies
/r/MensRights14/07/15 11:09 AM
1

someone get /r/PanicHistory in here i do agree with you though ;P
/r/MensRights14/07/15 11:03 AM
1

It seems the creator is more concerned with the reputations of perpetrators than the well-being of survivors of sexual assault. should read: it seems the creator is more concerned with the reputations of the falsely accused
/r/MensRights14/07/15 10:49 AM
1

just use your phone to videotape the whole of every sexual encounter. make sure you get affirmative consent beforehand, and as long as consent isn't withdrawn at any point during, you're golden. if consent is withdrawn, you stop. job done. also has the handy side benefit of your being able to show it to anyone if she starts spreading lies about you.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 10:47 AM
1

i've done this tons of times, and only gotten a 'no' once
/r/MensRights14/07/15 10:44 AM
2

it's working in scotland. they're atm trying to make it so there's only 80 spaces for women prisoners and when it's full any more criminals get non-custodial sentences
/r/MensRights14/07/15 10:26 AM
1

If I accuse you of stealing my wallet, and you are indeed in possession of my wallet, it needs to be proven that you and I consented to giving you my wallet. The same goes for consent with sex. no. if you accuse me of stealing your wallet, and i am indeed in possession your wallet, it needs to be proven that you did NOT consent to giving me your wallet.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 10:22 AM
1

With that aside, lets get down to business. Yes, they do need to verify that said unconsentual act happened to them. However, there are problems with issues pertaining to acts that occur when there is no concrete evidence on the matter or any witnesses. It's like accusing someone of verbally abusing you when no one is around. When it comes to rape, the rapes that are reported should be unconditionally investigated. With that said, it is important that both parties, when it comes to our justice s…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 10:18 AM
7

yarr, rape culture is a system where rape is a normalized, everyday occurrence where the authorities and society at large don't care about the victims. i.e. prison
/r/MensRights14/07/15 10:08 AM
1

wait a minute, 3% of the 13% who were very upset made a formal complaint? so that's less than half of one percent of female servicemen who actually thought they had a strong enough sexual harassment case to go ahead with a complaint? i can live with those numbers. fuck's sake carter, i know you've got to be politically correct but don't let the media use you to push their narrative
/r/MensRights13/07/15 12:10 AM
1

welcome to mensrights. i do hope you continue to spend time here, and i personally would actively encourage you to call out extremism whenever you see it. it's quite rare, and it gets heavily downvoted (along with that manhood academy weirdo who just won't stop spamming his website.) ultimately, only you can decide how extreme you think this sub is, or the movement as a whole. bear in mind that mensrights is a subset of the manosphere, which also contains things like MGTOW, theredpill and PUA's.…
/r/MensRights12/07/15 11:49 PM
3

define 'shitfaced and not with it' if i'm drunk and have sex with a chick who is fat and ugly and regret it the next day, was i raped? if i'm too drunk and have sex with a chick who is fat and ugly and regret it the next day? where's the line between 'drunk and responsible for my own actions' and 'too drunk to be responsible for what happens to me'?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 03:08 PM
1

well that's never going to take off
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:06 AM
1

max sentence for perverting the course of justice is life imprisonment, though that's uncommon. last time i remember anyone being convicted was an MP who tried to get his wife take his speeding ticket points. he got four years
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:36 PM
1

the dude produced texts from her from days after the alleged incident and told the police they could check the CCTV from ann summers to show she'd been sex toy shopping with him days after she alleged he drugged and raped her. that's a pretty clear basis that investigation is appropriate. but the police didn't bother and he had to spend his own money to get a private prosecution going. those of us who aren't millionaires can't afford to get the justice he got.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:35 PM
1

i don't fully agree with you there, but nvm
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:01 PM
2

bit harsh. deserved a good few years in prison, but not death.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 10:44 PM
1

Resources will always be finite, and trade offs must be considered, of course. What I'm talking about is cases where a man is accused, by name, and can produce proof of his innocence (electronic records, CCTV, whatever). At the moment the police usually just drop the charges and end it there. Occasionally they'll fine the false accuser for wasting police time (misdemeanour style), and in a ridiculously low number of cases, they'll actually prosecute the false accuser for attempting to pervert th…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 10:35 PM
2

calling a skeptic a 'climate change denier' is exactly the same as calling an MRA who supports due process for the accused a 'rape apologist.' it's an SJW shaming tactic and it's extremely effective.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:56 PM
1

i was trying to use the word neutrally. the intent was for the word 'whore' to have no more ill will than the word 'millionaire.' it's not a value judgment, i don't think millionaires are necessarily bad people...
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:38 PM
3

They escalated this case from what could have been a woman trying to use them and not succeeding to a globally known scandal by pursuing it with no evidence. actually the police didn't even try to investigate her for perverting the course of justice. the man supplied them with evidence he was innocent and she was lying, they dropped the charges against him and did nothing about her. he had to hire a private lawyer for 200 grand to investigate and bring a private prosecution against her, which un…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:34 PM
1

i still hold on to the hope that reason and logic will win out here in the UK, if only because we don't tend to change laws too willy-nilly and the house of lords especially is good at nuking bad legislation. but the media and academia are so heavily infiltrated by SJWs and feminists and authoritarian lefties it really makes one despair.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:16 PM
1

perverting the course of justice. it's like what, perjury? bearing false witness? think of it like the felony version of wasting police time, whatever that is
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:03 PM
1

learn english better
/r/MensRights09/07/15 02:11 PM
7

i would agree, but she crossed the line when she falsely accused him of rape. if it was just him finding out she was a whore and dumping her, followed by her suicide, i'd have all the compassion in the world. but not when she tried to ruin his life and have him locked up on a false charge. that's too far.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 01:41 PM
13

they're not trying to change anything about this particular case, it's over, he's innocent, she's a whore who lied to the police. the push here is to try and get the high court to rule that private citizens shouldn't be allowed to do what this millionaire did, hire a private lawyer and try to clear his name. if only he'd been satisfied with the police dropping the charges and hadn't tried to clear his name in the court of public opinion, she'd still be alive and wouldn't have been charged with p…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 01:37 PM
2

there was a couple i read, one was anonymised data from pornhub, the other a survey for ann summers. something like 40-55% of women watch porn on the regular, not that 40% of porn watched was by women, my mistake
/r/MensRights09/07/15 03:47 AM
1

no it was from those porn sites where you can login and stuff, i suppose people could be lying about their gender though
/r/MensRights09/07/15 03:19 AM
6

actually i've been reading recently about how as much of 40% of porn consumption is women watching it, and for written erotic fiction it's like 90%, with female authors the majority. also women tend to have a preference for more hardcore and BDSM type stuff, where men prefer the more standard suck/fuck/facial and softcore side of things. or if not preference, a strong trend at least. i'll see if i can find a link for ya
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:16 PM
4

hardly matters why people make the choices they do, you're not going to change human nature. you can try all you want to 'encourage' more women to make the choices you think are the right ones, and indeed, womens' enrolment in STEM has been going up in recent years. but so have dropout rates. they get to the end of their first year, realise it's not for them, and then switch to a liberal arts degree, or media or gender studies. at some point y'all are going to have to come to accept that men and…
/r/MensRights06/07/15 03:20 AM
5

you're missing the point, men and women make different choices, they always will, and that's going to mean different outcomes. this is not some 'problem' that needs to be 'fixed'. you can design a system where everyone has equal opportunity (and i'd argue that our current society has way more opportunities for women than men when it comes to education) but no human being can design a system where two groups who make different choices will experience an equality of outcome. unless you want to go …
/r/MensRights06/07/15 02:39 AM
2

no one is discouraging women from taking higher paid jobs. we've had several decades of initiatives and subsidies designed to encourage more women into university and the workforce. and what are they choosing to do? gender studies degrees, parenting, secretarial work, call centre work and nursing. you just can't change human nature
/r/MensRights06/07/15 02:06 AM
1

she attributed her academic failure and poor decision making on being wrapped up in her boyfriend. of course any negative outcome she experiences is due to a man, not her own failings
/r/MensRights04/07/15 04:47 PM
16

i especially enjoyed the comment about the girl who wanted to be a pharmacist, went to community college then went on to a degree course in chemistry, but because of her boyfriend (somehow his fault), got bad grades and switched to a liberal arts degree instead, and now has no interest in anything to do with the arts... how about taking responsibility for your own decisions and failures, young lady?
/r/MensRights04/07/15 02:35 PM
3

there's less of a negative connotation around the word 'circumcised' than there is around 'mutilated.' which is a shame, because if we could get everyone to call it 'male genital mutilation' which is what it is, then a hell of a lot more people would oppose it. keep fighting the good fight and don't stop calling it MGM, traction is happening already and all we need to do is keep up the pressure, and we can end this practice.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 12:54 AM
5

while it's not necessarily a 'men's rights' issue, it overlaps with a lot of what the men's rights community is all about, in the same way that there's a big overlap between us and, say, kotakuinaction, in that we are opposed to the prevailing authoritarian-social-justice-warrior-feminist type of propaganda. i'm happy that this sub joined the protest.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 12:44 AM
2

boom. love it
/r/MensRights02/07/15 07:11 PM
-7

in the pocketbook what is this, 1937?
/r/MensRights02/07/15 07:11 PM
2

i don't think it's a parody, unfortunately. :( good post though, saving that for later
/r/MensRights30/06/15 05:50 PM
2

sounds like my kind of teacher, hope she sues them for a shitload of money
/r/MensRights30/06/15 05:47 PM
10

excellent quote there; No Vice Chancellor would take on an ethnic-minority militant feminist. Those are not humble Nobel laureates who can be forced to resign quietly.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 05:39 PM
1

the best male teachers out there tend to gravitate towards privately funded boy's schools. if you're a yank and you have a master's in any of the sciences, maths or english language, you can get a really good wage teaching at british prep schools.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 09:00 PM
2

she is trying to even the score. she thinks that by 'encouraging' girls (telling them they're smarter, that they should go into STEM, probably giving them extra marks on assessments to give them a 'leg up' or 'even the playing field') that the next generation of women will follow her vision and the future will be a utopia where women earn equal pay and make up half of all politicians and company directors. in her mind, she's got a good cause and the ends justify the means
/r/MensRights28/06/15 08:51 PM
3

there's occasionally a really good article in some of those, i remember a piece for slate that was asking if something had gone too far (it had), and i'm happy to give them traffic for those types of articles, we want them to see that there's an audience for good journalism out there. so a subreddit-wide ban on particular outlets might not be the best thing, better would be a guideline to use archive links or screenshots and let the users decide?
/r/MensRights28/06/15 07:55 PM
1

Rule of thumb is a phrase which means, 'not absolutely accurate, but close enough' it comes from the end of the thumb to the first knuckle, which is roughly an inch on adult humans. 'Rule' in this case being a word for a measuring device (ruler). Not sufficiently accurate for carpentry but close enough to estimate the length of a short thing Or that whole idea may be apocryphal :D
/r/MensRights28/06/15 09:12 AM
10

of course the next thing will be a series of articles in the guardian et al claiming she's been the victim of online harassment
/r/MensRights27/06/15 02:25 PM
1

The German girls that I know are absolute darlings. No whiny entitlement, no special snowflake syndrome, just honest and decent. I think it's because their culture still has some traditional values, while not sticking rigidly to the more silly ones.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 02:42 PM
1

Well spotted
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:42 AM
1

Well that's a matter of opinion and something which can be discussed. It's important to remember that both of you are kind, caring and compassionate people who just want to make the world a better place, while realising that you may have different opinions on what that better world looks like or how best to get there. Some people think that reducing the male population to 10% would make the world a better place, some that all that is required is the extermination of the Jews. Some people think a…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:58 AM
2

the first thing you have to get her to agree to is that men and women are not the same. aside from the different genitalia, the different chromosomes, the difference in percentage body fat, the different muscle mass - collectively, biological differences - men and women have different interests, hobbies, desires and aspirations. how many men want to be a vet? how many women want to be a football player? now this is not to say that ALL men are X, or ALL women are Y, this is just to say that taken…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 12:56 AM
1

anyone else seen that film with mark wahlberg in it where he gives free gym membership to strippers? same deal. get more women in with lower prices to attract more business from guys. vote with your dollars, men. take your business elsewhere and let them know why
/r/MensRights25/06/15 10:43 PM
2

/u/trollabot mushybees
/r/MensRights25/06/15 09:57 PM
1

you can say that again
/r/MensRights25/06/15 09:51 PM
37

easy enough rebuttal. this is not how society treats consent. this is how psychopaths treat consent.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 11:26 AM
2

wait, Kevin Spacey is gay? how come I wasn't informed of this?
/r/MensRights25/06/15 10:41 AM
1

well that makes a little more sense i guess. hopefully the tide of public opinion is swinging against snap outrage from twitter
/r/MensRights25/06/15 10:24 AM
3

yeah that really annoys me that they just talked over him the whole time. god damn BBC
/r/MensRights24/06/15 11:41 PM
14

i find myself wondering why it took a 'leaked' transcript of the speech to reveal what he actually said... weren't the journalists in the audience who started the twitstorm listening after the first sentence? i said the day after, he should never have apologised for anything, nor resigned. he should have said 'fuck you i'm not resigning' to UCL, and 'go read the full speech before you make up your mind' to any reporters afterwards. stand your ground men. you capitulate, they'll go for the throat
/r/MensRights24/06/15 11:11 PM
9

but... but... i thought y'all wanted equality? now you're suing because you have to meet the same standards as the men?
/r/MensRights24/06/15 07:51 PM
1

Wrong subreddit for that sort of thing man.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/15 07:48 AM
6

Didn't that politician get three years for ptcoj for getting his wife to take his speeding points? Eight months a little too lenient perhaps but better than nothing
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/15 07:47 AM
1

i think you mean 'palpable'
/r/MensRights24/06/15 12:08 AM
7

he can, but neither of them are going to be successful
/r/MensRights23/06/15 11:42 PM
4

former bar manager here. pretty common to have the girls working the bar, they sell more. better to have guys waitering, they're much better at it. sucks, i know, but that's the way it is. instead of becoming a bartender at that place, you might find it better to train for management, failing that, apply for bartending jobs at other places, and keep your current job till a really good offer comes up.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 11:41 PM
1

oh sure, worked so well in america's war on crime in the sixties
/r/MensRights23/06/15 01:56 PM
7

god what a load of crap. beta males can be underlings in the feminist movement, and alpha males can rise to positions of power, as long as they credit women with their ideas and maintain the narrative
/r/MensRights23/06/15 01:53 PM
28

it's a moral panic, like the satanic child abuse shit in the last couple decades of the 20th, like the witch hunts of the century before. it'll blow over eventually
/r/MensRights23/06/15 01:34 PM
25

get some discreet hidden cameras going on. if she fucks with your ride again, call the cops, show them the evidence. most cops are pretty reasonable and understand the system is screwed up sometimes but they try to make the best of it anyway. record any interaction you have with this woman or her kids, even if it's just keeping a notebook, something you may later rely on.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 01:33 PM
4

yup. 'sure, this was a racist attack. but he's also being sexist in trying to 'protect' white women from being raped' - this is intersectionality for you
/r/MensRights22/06/15 06:55 PM
7

replace 'women' with 'feminists' there and you have a point
/r/MensRights22/06/15 06:47 PM
2

dammit, i used to like Lorde. she's on the shitlist now, along with dunham and taylor swift
/r/MensRights22/06/15 05:49 PM
3

get a lawyer, immediately. cheaper than 18 years of child support payments
/r/MensRights22/06/15 05:47 PM
16

damn straight. good to see Nige standing by his remarks. if you don't give in to their tactics, they can't beat you
/r/MensRights22/06/15 11:03 AM
1

can't read it, some kind of ad or paywall blocking my android
/r/MensRights22/06/15 10:58 AM
3

dude if she's being abusive, leave. i know it's not easy, but it's easier than prison
/r/MensRights21/06/15 10:16 PM
1

oh i understand that, who is DSS? why are they visiting? tell me a story! needs moar context
/r/MensRights21/06/15 10:02 PM
1

explain
/r/MensRights21/06/15 09:05 PM
2

To the father, if you don't want this child then here are the papers. Sign these and you will be relinquishing your rights to this child and for all intents and purposes will no longer be the legal father. problem with this is judges aren't going to do it. if the state can't hold the father financially responsible then the state has to subsidise the child. just isn't practical. the father at present can make the decision to not be a parent, but that doesn't get him off the financial hook, while …
/r/MensRights21/06/15 09:04 PM
1

I was taught, if I'm in the right, to stand my ground and not give in to bullies
/r/MensRights17/06/15 07:47 PM
1

I'm not seeing any news here
/r/MensRights17/06/15 07:37 PM
1

That's what I was saying. Stand your ground and make them fire you
/r/MensRights17/06/15 07:29 PM
3

welcome to mensrights. that's how a lot of us got here.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:28 PM
6

interesting. six years ago she gets drunk and makes a bad decision, to have sex with a guy. regrets it afterwards. feels bad. feels ashamed and guilty. fast forward six years and someone tells her she can define it as sexual assault. no need to take responsibility for her own actions, no need to feel ashamed any more, all she has to do is redefine it as rape and suddenly he's a bad guy, and she's an innocent victim. i'm sure she feels much better now.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:14 PM
1

cheers
/r/MensRights16/06/15 01:08 PM
2

get on it. and let us know here if we can offer any support
/r/MensRights16/06/15 01:03 PM
1

a lot of the time the mitigating factors are 'has vagina' and 'has children who need their mother' - even when those children would clearly be better off without their insane, drug addicted serial criminal mother. fathers get no such consideration as children aren't presumed to need their fathers over here
/r/MensRights16/06/15 11:55 AM
1

Pretty much. But add to person 1: and you need to spend 100 trillion dollars of taxpayers money on sandbags and sandbag research. Which will allow me, the flood expert, to get that new mercedes
/r/MensRights15/06/15 09:08 PM
2

i wouldn't trust either. climate change has become so politicised it's hard to find objective, unbiased sources for anything
/r/MensRights15/06/15 05:32 PM
2

what dean said. also, relying on the WWF for environmentalist statistics is like relying on Ms Magazine for rape statistics.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 05:01 PM
2

yarr. i smell brigading
/r/MensRights15/06/15 04:49 PM
2

there we go, we need some definitional clarity here. southern is a skeptic, one who is not convinced by the argument thus far. what she's being called is a Denier, which is just a way for 'right-thinking' people to dismiss everything someone says because they're literally hitler. calling southern a climate change 'denier' is like calling christina hoff sommers a 'rape apologist'. same tactic.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 04:48 PM
21

He shouldn't have apologised, or resigned. He should have told UCL to grow a set and fire him. The only way to beat these social justice warrior witch hunts is to tell them to fuck off, you stand by your remarks and if they don't like it they can take a number, get in line, and kiss my ass.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 07:39 AM
3

Ah, roger
/r/MensRights14/06/15 07:08 AM
5

Dude, not helpful
/r/MensRights14/06/15 06:48 AM
1

i think we can all agree on that
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:13 PM
8

that's one person expressing their opinion, that they believe beyond reasonable doubt that she lied. everyone else agrees that if she is shown beyond reasonable doubt to be lying that she should face charges. nobody else in that thread thought that threshold had been met
/r/MensRights09/06/15 05:17 PM
2

i've just read through the first half page of that thread and nowhere did i see anyone advocate prosecuting accusers without evidence.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 05:01 PM
5

it's a censorship tactic. their hope is that if they get enough people spouting this propaganda against the MRM, then normal people will believe it and dismiss anything we might say. as my man Tyrion said; 'if you cut out a man's tongue you do not prove him a liar, you are merely proving to the world that you are afraid of what he might say' so what are they afraid of? that if people were to actually listen to us they might see that they agree with a lot of what we say? that we might start to po…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 04:52 PM
1

You could try making the point that wages aren't unequal. Any two people who do the same job to the same standard get paid the same. Overall men tend to choose jobs and careers that pay more, women tend to choose jobs and careers that offer more flexible working hours and more nonmonetary benefits. If your interlocutor believes that men overall making more money than women overall is a problem, then they need to go out there and start telling people that these choices they are making, well they'…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:44 PM
2

saving this one for later
/r/MensRights09/06/15 09:02 AM
8

seems to be something of a smear campaign going on, the usual identity politics stuff. if you call MRA's evil misogynist rape-enabling wife-beaters long enough and loud enough, and get it parroted through the liberal media, enough moderate and fair minded people will start to believe it. this is why it's important to attend things like gay pride, to show your ordinary folk that you're actually just like any advocacy group, there are issues you care about and want people to notice. and keep your …
/r/MensRights08/06/15 05:05 PM
2

labour is fully becoming the party of the social justice warrior. any kind of discrimination, prejudice and censorship are ok as long as it's the right people doing it to the wrong people. can't see them recovering for the 2020 election either
/r/MensRights08/06/15 12:46 AM
4

I tend to think of the old left\right being lib\con and up\down being authoritarian\libertarian graph, but instead of it being 2d, its on the surface of a sphere. Go far enough in any direction and you come out the other side
/r/MensRights07/06/15 11:23 AM
8

And for those of us who aren't super rich and can't afford expensive lawyers, we get an even worse deal, losing the house even though we still owe money on the mortgage which we still have to pay despite it not belonging to us anymore, losing the kids, losing half our savings and still being gutted for child support. If we're lucky we get to keep the van because we need it to go work and earn money to pay for that lazy fat cow who's never done a days work in her life... Theoretically, of course.…
/r/MensRights06/06/15 07:34 PM
3

Top left is where modern feminism lives, hence nobody from this sub is likely to be up there
/r/MensRights05/06/15 08:57 AM
2

not once thousands of men start going to prison for doing nothing wrong. then we'll see a change. and once the end of humanity is upon us and the last few women are sitting around wondering how it all went so wrong... nope, they'll probably still blame men
/r/MensRights03/06/15 03:16 PM
1

add to that video evidence with the guy asking for a reaffirmation of consent before every activity.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 03:15 PM
10

maybe when women start to notice that no-one will sleep with them unless they have a bar receipt, breathalyser printout and a signed letter of consent initialed by two witnesses, plus video and audio confirmation of their consent, they'll finally realise that they've taken it too far.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 01:23 PM
7

that's actually a pretty good, pretty good idea...
/r/MensRights03/06/15 12:33 PM
1

fucking alison saunders again. this is the rampant feminist DPP who only prosecutions historical allegations of abuse by male celebrities, and won't even entertain female suspects. who believes men cannot be raped except by other men. she makes me rage so hard
/r/MensRights03/06/15 12:16 PM
1

I think what I was getting at was; why then are you a socialist?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 05:17 AM
1

you can be all those things without being a socialist, source: i am
/r/MensRights01/06/15 08:36 AM
-1

only reason the US spends more money on healthcare is silly laws prohibiting health insurance providers from refusing to cover people with pre-existing conditions. this pushes the price up for everyone. add to that the horrendously litiginous culture that pushes up the price of malpractice insurance and costs go up again. if people don't get health insurance, then get diagnosed with something, it's their own damn fault and they should have to pay for their treatment themselves. this would reduce…
/r/MensRights01/06/15 08:33 AM
2

not a bad article, though i have some difficulty recognising New Male Studies as an 'academic journal'. i think this would work better as a blog post
/r/MensRights31/05/15 02:54 PM
1

never attribute to malice that which can be more easily explained by incompetence
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:14 PM
1

yeah, because persecution, genocide and censorship are all fine, as long as it's the right people doing it to the wrong people. standard SJW MO
/r/MensRights28/05/15 11:43 PM
9

i like that bit of statistical twisting there. you say 50% of domestic violence is perpetrated by women, she says 80% of all violence perpetrated by men, and only 4% of all violence perpetrated by women who are current or former partners of the victim. everyone is using accurate statistics, it's just a shame she doesn't understand them. she probably even believes she is correct
/r/MensRights28/05/15 10:31 PM
1

I think its because, in her world, being white makes you an oppressor, so if she admitted to being white that would make her a bad person
/r/MensRights28/05/15 04:21 PM
3

This. Its a place where 'capitalist' is an insult, where girls can't be sexist because sexism requires you to be the 'oppressing class' and where people actually think a media studies degree is worth having
/r/MensRights28/05/15 04:08 PM
1

My sister went there and they are all either completely uncaring about any of this, or on her side, with very few exceptions
/r/MensRights28/05/15 04:01 PM
2

Can't tell if satire or just shit.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 08:15 AM
1

Heh. Full-hard-on feminist.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 07:31 AM
13

i really wish people wouldn't call it positive discrimination. there's nothing positive about it, it's just discrimination, and it's wrong, no matter which group of people is doing it.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 10:13 AM
2

Good thread, I'll be reading with interest
/r/MensRights27/04/15 01:14 PM
1

150 quid? Is that it? We really need some stronger punishments for this behaviour.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 10:19 AM
3

Certainly seems to be a growing support for the idea. Progress is happening menz, keep on keeping on
/r/MensRights23/03/15 07:32 PM
1

sometimes people, both male and female, need to be punched in the face. just make sure your ass is covered though eh?
/r/MensRights21/03/15 02:01 PM
2

valid direction on the piece, but theres a couple of factual inaccuracies. i'm going to have to come back to this after some sleep
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:09 AM
1

it's that whole 'feminism hurting the people it's trying to help' thing again, they keep fuelling these perceptions of men, of society, of STEM, of the police in rape cases, and it's only dissuading girls from actually giving it a go, trying that course, making that report, asking for that raise or promotion. if you keep telling them they're oppressed they'll start beliving you, and then start acting as if they are, its like a self fulfilling prophecy.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:03 AM
1

of course there's a counter example. 47 years ago a feminist got hired by the forestry service, and 'equal opportunities' led to lost lives, livelihoods, hell, whole ecosystems http://www.thinkinghousewife.com/wp/2012/06/how-feminism-wrecked-the-u-s-forest-service/ bit wordy, but worth the read. britain's first female train driver wanted an equal opportunity, and got it and deserved it. reactionary feminism wants to take what it doesn't deserve and doesn't care how much damage it does
/r/MensRights18/03/15 09:13 PM
2

that's my point, there's only resentment of girls in STEM subjects when the men there see women getting in either on a quota when they're less qualified, or because they're studying for free due to bursaries/scholarships, when the men are having to get into massive debt. it's a prime case of initiatives that do more harm to their intended beneficiaries than good. anyone who wants to encourage girls to study STEM subjects is perfectly within their rights and i think it's an admirable goal. but th…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 08:51 PM
2

people really need to get the concept into their heads, if a person wants to mutilate themself, or pay someone else to do it, and they're over the age of consent, they should be free to do whatever the hell they want. but to cut off or pierce or mutilate in any way the body of a person who is underage and can't consent to it is morally wrong. that's all the law needs to say. it can be gender neutral and fair and then that's it, case closed, anyone who does it goes to prison.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 03:43 PM
29

Functional family leave policies? Heres an idea, make it illegal to ask a potential employee if she intends to have kids, force companies to keep jobs open for women that may not come back after maternity leave, and force companies to pay women the exact same salary as men. What will companies do? Hire fewer women. In STEM fields, to get more women in, heres an idea, force institutions to take 50% men and women. What happens? If theres 50 places available and 100 applicants, 25 of which are wome…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 11:01 AM
2

Lawyer up, asap. Lawyer lawyer lawyer. And not a crappy one, get a good one. There was a guy did an ama on reddit a while ago, never did anything wrong but nevertheless spent five years in prison and lost everything due to his ex wife lying about him, and him having shitty lawyers. Get a lawyer, do it now, damn the cost
/r/MensRights17/03/15 02:47 PM
1

indeed, look at the island natives of vanuatu. the men sit around the campfire, discussing politics and making agreements and policy decisions. but it's the wives that actually make all the decisions. they tell their husbands how to vote and send them to attend the meeting. it's one of those, everyone knows, nobody says anything about it type of deals. other examples of women in power could include lady macbeth, hillary clinton, cherie blair...
/r/MensRights16/03/15 01:17 PM
2

property is violence? explain please
/r/MensRights16/03/15 01:09 PM
-1

Wait, the earth is billions of years old of course, but global warming? Thats been busted just as much as the wage gap has
/r/MensRights16/03/15 08:28 AM
1

is 'homely' a synonym for 'ugly'?>
/r/MensRights16/03/15 12:54 AM
4

milo continues to pleasantly surprise me
/r/MensRights16/03/15 12:53 AM
2

sort of explains why a sub like masculism is less successful, it doesn't provoke anger in its readers so they fell less compelled to spread it
/r/MensRights16/03/15 12:23 AM
2

here's CGP Grey on why anger makes movements stronger: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rE3j_RHkqJc
/r/MensRights16/03/15 12:15 AM
4

what i don't get is, who the hell is teaching these kids? are they not at university to receive an education? how can they be so ignorant? we need a list of establishments with activist idiots like this. then those of us who aren't complete tards can send our kids elsewhere. they'll soon sack the women's issues professors and disband the radfem student societies when they realise nobody wants to go there anymore
/r/MensRights15/03/15 11:52 PM
1

not how hot necessarily, but appearance is important in politics. hell, david cameron's hairdresser got an MBE. and im sure i remember reading something about all the american presidents so far having been spectacle wearers, though they didnt wear them in public, and none of them being bald, and that one that was in the wheelchair and nobody knew. perception in politics is massively important and appearance is part of that
/r/MensRights15/03/15 03:08 PM
6

On objectification, its really all about attractiveness. For evolutionary reasons, men are attracted to young, vibrant, fertile women and women are attracted to strong, dominant, resourceful men. So women are objectified on looks and men are objectified on wealth. Whether this is a good thing or not depends. If youre an ugly woman or a poor man youre probably not gonna be in favour
/r/MensRights15/03/15 12:38 PM
45

Does our culture victim blame? Depends on your definition. As bill burr says, if i get bit by a rattlesnake, your gonna have a few questions, like 'what were you doing? Were you fucking with it?' or when a house burns down the firemen dont just pack up and leave, they sift through the debris to find the cause. Likewise, if a person is raped, we should be asking questions like 'where did it happen? Were you walking home at night through a dark alley? Was it someone you knew? Did you actually say …
/r/MensRights15/03/15 11:44 AM
1

Companies pay women the same as men. Its the law.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 11:24 AM
1

I think thats possibly a little strong, but i know for sure that the bailey of 'a movement aiming to promote equality between the sexes' is much further away. I would call todays feminism 'a special interest group with the aim of improving the lives of women' though that doesnt fully encapsulate it. Specifically, a lot of what modern feminism does actually hurts women, especially poor women and lesbians, so perhaps 'the aim of improving the lives of educated, cishet middle class women', though t…
/r/MensRights15/03/15 11:16 AM
1

start at about 45:30 for wage gap, though if you have the time, the whole program is enlightening.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 09:29 AM
2

appearance has nothing to do with politics? on what planet?
/r/MensRights15/03/15 06:12 AM
1

good username
/r/MensRights15/03/15 06:10 AM
0

Also re: point 3, an example of our conditions for success would be 'when men and women either both get anonymity or neither get anonymity in rape investigations', thats a win. Youll note the feminist position is usually something like 'one in four women is raped in her life (not even close to accurate) because of rape culture and normalised attitudes and patriarchy and society needs to change the culture in some nebulous, undefined way'. See? No win condition there. The problem is framed in suc…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 11:05 AM
-1

1) How would you say you or other men are discriminated against in society? The big one for me is false rape accusations, a girl can completely ruin your life, while she gets to remain anonymous. And if she's done the same thing five times before, that information is inadmissible in court. It stinks. Also even if she's found to be demonstrably lying, shes unlikely to face any consequences. I think the harshest was a two year suspended sentence in my country. Which is, you know, nothing. Theres t…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 10:46 AM
1

Yeah, if some feminist group thinks its a good idea to encourage girls to study engineering, for example, then i fully support their freedom to spend their own money on it. Especially since theres a good chance the recipients will decide they dont like it and change subjects at the end of the first year. I only have a problem with it if its the university spending taxpayers money on that crap. Unless they want to start men-only womens studies scholarships too.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 10:17 AM
4

When i ran pubs, i would always try to get as many hot young ladies behind the bar as possible. Its good for business. However, the bar supervisors and bar managers would usually be guys. Better workers. So go for the duty manager's job next time. You got experience and you got heft, good luck my man
/r/MensRights13/03/15 10:11 AM
1

Exactly. Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future. Making this article a complete waste of time
/r/MensRights13/03/15 10:08 AM
2

Indeed. Add your own sign next to it, include stats like percent workplace deaths, full vs part time, emphasise earnings is due to individual choice, then take a picture so that when yours gets torn down you can print out that picture and put that up, thereby demonstrating to all who see it that their position is so weak they'll censor any dissent. Then add a quote about how to find out who's in charge, first find out who youre not allowed to question etc etc. Keep fighting the good fight, but d…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 09:53 AM
-3

Good work lutherans, theres still no god though
/r/MensRights13/03/15 09:25 AM
6

Relevant username
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:53 PM
3

This. also the previous sentence; "Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity." If she's wrong, tell her she's wrong. print out a list from cotwa of proven false allegations. try to be diplomatic if possible; you're not calling her a liar, or trying to attack her personally, merely to inform her that she was incorrect. see john maynard keynes; when the facts change, my opinion changes, what of you? if her opinion remains that women never lie about rape, then clearly her ideology and persona…
/r/MensRights19/01/15 12:43 AM
2

holy fuck. that headline. wow. words fail me
/r/MensRights17/01/15 12:27 AM
1

i call BS on this comment
/r/MensRights15/01/15 11:06 PM
2

do you get paid more than everyone else? if not, you should
/r/MensRights15/01/15 10:08 PM
2

Good old Victorian stiff upper lip Britishness. We should all teach our son s and daughters to aspire to these maxims, because if you replace 'you'll be a man my son' with 'you'll be a human being, my progeny' its as valuable and poignant as ever. One of those rare pieces of poetry that can move me to tears
/r/MensRights24/12/14 09:20 PM
5

I love you, man
/r/MensRights24/12/14 09:13 PM
1

This is some pretty hateful shit right here. No sense of balance, no fair or even handed treatment, just pure agenda. Are people really taken in by this crap?
/r/MensRights24/12/14 09:09 PM
5

already loved maisie, now i love her even more
/r/MensRights24/12/14 01:54 AM
1

so it's a good job i've been videotaping all my sexual encounters then. useful to have if someone tries to retroactively withdraw consent in the future
/r/MensRights22/12/14 12:31 PM
1

bigger issue for the yanks i think. the two main british parties are essentially both lefty. agreed that the MRM should avoid being partisan
/r/MensRights18/12/14 02:56 AM
7

it'll never work. women find 80% of men to be of 'less than average' attractiveness (logic there), and lets face it, if you're in the top 20% you're not likely to be online dating. so the vast majority of men who use it will never get a message, or if they do, it will be from something that looks like it's been hit in the face with a truck. and they'll stop using it.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 09:03 AM
11

yeah they always complain about lack of female CEO's, never about lack of female sewage workers, bin men, coal miners etc
/r/MensRights12/12/14 11:16 AM
1

that first sentence includes made to penetrate. read carefully: rape is the unlawful penetration of a Person (doesn't say victim), against the will of the victim. so a female rapist can be the person who is penetrated, by the victim whose will it is against. or am i reading too closely?
/r/MensRights12/12/14 11:04 AM
2

what happened next?
/r/MensRights10/12/14 12:00 AM
3

Indeed, this is the fairest, least biased and best piece of journalism I've seen on the subject so far
/r/MensRights08/12/14 06:04 PM
9

i think parents cross the line when they cut off part of an infant's body. if someone wants to be circumcised, by all means they should be free to do so. but they should have a say, they should have to give consent, and this means not doing it to minors
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter