| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Male representation in Media: A list of animated TV shows by gender of lead characterI just think it makes your list dishonest and useless. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 27/06/25 05:18 AM |
| 1 | Male representation in Media: A list of animated TV shows by gender of lead characterYour second criteria is nonsense though. What does it matter? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 27/06/25 04:31 AM |
| 3 | Male representation in Media: A list of animated TV shows by gender of lead characterOk so then how are you including Totally Spies or She-Ra? Or fucking Velma, as if it isn’t a new version of Scooby-Doo? Totally Spies ran From 2001 to 2008 and was then revived twice. She-Ra was an 80s show that’s been reimagined now. Hey wait, Voltron was another 1980s show. So you’ve already broken your own rules, but seemingly only for shows you put in the female-centered category. Why? Is this a list of shows running now? No, because Avatar is on the list and like I said, it’s been off the a… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 26/06/25 09:41 PM |
| 2 | Male representation in Media: A list of animated TV shows by gender of lead characterWhat was your criteria? You have Avatar the Last Airbender (which was an ensemble cast and not male centered) on there but that show ended in 2008, 17 years ago. So why don’t you have any Ninja Turtles shows listed? No Batman TAS? No Superman TAS? You can’t say they’re too old when you have a cartoon that an adult could have been too young to watch while it was running on the list. Be clear what your criteria are and then don’t go from your own recollections but find a list of animated shows. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 26/06/25 09:29 PM |
| 3 | Male disposability is a human right, apparentlyI have seen this ”men can impregnate a bunch of women very fast while women take nine months to make a child” brought up so many times to justify why women are more precious than men but … has it ever actually played out that way in human societies? During WWI, when millions of French men of prime baby-making age were out fighting and dying in trenches, the number of children born plummeted. It’s estimated that France’s population lost as many people from kids not born in 1914-1918 as died in th… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 26/06/25 12:45 PM |
| 1 | "Men are in crisis and the last ones we seem to ever think about. I hate the phrase “women and children first” as it translates to men don’t have the same value. “Let them die” and that is so ingrained in our society."Eh, easy enough to make that mistake, like you said. I think that we definitely agree in the modern world. Saying ”but women are more necessary for reproduction” in a world where monogamy is the absolute standard and where we are way below replacement rates and so clearly no one is having kids just for the benefit of society is patently absurd. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/25 05:00 PM |
| 1 | "Men are in crisis and the last ones we seem to ever think about. I hate the phrase “women and children first” as it translates to men don’t have the same value. “Let them die” and that is so ingrained in our society."The baby boom happened after WWII, not WWI. While WWII was more destructive overall, in France WWI killed more people. And while the number of births jumps up from the absolute dearth during the war years in 1920, they then shrink during the 20s and especially in the 1930s when all those not born during WWI would have otherwise been having kids. Because that’s the real effect. If you lose a bunch of men, then there’s fewer people to take care of kids overall and so fewer kids will be born. A wom… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/06/25 09:04 AM |
| 2 | "Men are in crisis and the last ones we seem to ever think about. I hate the phrase “women and children first” as it translates to men don’t have the same value. “Let them die” and that is so ingrained in our society."Except is there any evidence of that ever happening? Ancient or modern? France didn’t send women in as front line soldiers in WWI and there wasn’t a significant level of bombings of rear areas. Yet France suffered a demographic crisis after the war and polygamy was not suddenly legalized. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/06/25 02:11 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter