TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

muuh-gnu Archive

View 4 posts and 93 comments by muuh-gnu on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

your American puritanism amuses me. Germans are the masters of cuckoldry, and youre dying out. Your women are eagerly importing millions of muslims and niggers to replace you. So whatever you think this "sexuality" thing is, youre doing it wrong, and youre not in a position to look down upon people who do place more restrictions on it than you. Get your cucked country back to a replacement level birthrate, then we can talk.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/16 01:41 PM
0

So men who are intelligent and strong enough to see through the bullshit will pass their genes, the weaklings who bow down will be mercilessly weeded out of the gene pool. Out job here is to get better at the game of life, we're not here to protect the betas and the weaklings from Charles Darwin.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/16 01:35 PM
1

But having a target in the first place is a start. I'm with you. My point was just that, if you target it at all, you should do it from the safe position outside of marriage. If you do that, your withholding of commitment will IMHO weight more than your activism. And also, just explaining to somebody why you dont want something isnt activism. Activism would be getting political, organizing, rallying, having pressure groups, etc. Thats a waste of time. Just withhold marriage and lean back.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/15 11:10 AM
9

we instead do activism to get rid of alimony Because alimony is just one of 1001 things that are wrong with the system. Fighting each one of them will just deplete your resources and youll spend years of your life fighting shit, while theyll come up with workarounds faster than you can fight them. Fighting the system from within the rules set by the system is an unwinnable uphill battle. "dont get married" is a complete solution. it attacks, it john-galts the complete system. it lets it collapse…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/15 07:21 AM
4

hamster away your complicity It is not complicity to survive first and fight them slowly by stealth subversion. When you want to infiltrate enemy lines, or the enemy has already overrun your lines, you absolutely need to become invisible and get into guerilla mode. Openly figting to the last man is stuff for the movies, in reality it gets you quickly executed. Patient step-by-step subversion is how they won after all. Theyre outright communists and want to crush western civilisation, but they ca…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 04:54 AM
-7

Well Im no fan of communism Which basically means that you are. a lot of socialism could be eliminated without suffering if taxes and income favored labor over investment But thats socialism too. "Favoring" anything over anything else by threat of state force, i.e. forcibly redistributing favors is what socialism is. It gets a bit detailed but I thinknits doable. It is forced upon somebody. And if it forced upon somebody, people will resist, underperform and actively or passively sabotage it, wh…
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 05:18 AM
1

I mean all it takes is one woman to nail him for child support The existence of the 20/80 distribution skewed in Chad's favor indicates that in practice, the women will not nail him for child support, but go for BB-paid "safety net" welfare instead. government taking his money and giving it to slutty sally who decided to keep the baby hoping to ensnare Chad. Slutty sally wants chad's genes, not his money, which he might not even have. She either has a BB under her control directly, or indirectly…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/15 02:48 PM
2

We should abandon this notion that women Half of the votes "we" have are female votes. They wont vote to their own detriment and so will neither their leftist BBs nor their Chads. The percentage of RP/DE/NRx-aware people that do not actually want this is pretty small. "We" basically lost the game not the moment we allowed womens suffrage, but when we allowed democracy. Democracy begets "social" wealth redistribution, and social wealth redistribution begets AFBB and 20/80. As soon as you realize …
/r/TheRedPill12/09/15 10:57 AM
2

Dont forget the granddaddy of organized theft and violence, socialism. Tribalism would be largerly ineffective if there was no socialism to exploit.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/15 07:46 PM
7

Even when you are wealthy, you are awake 16 hrs per day and have to do something with your time. Self-made rich usually monetized a hobby, and wont stop excercising that hobby sudenly because they dont need more money any more, because they never did it purely for money in the first place. The money came along just because they were good at something. You usually dont get rich doing something you hate.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/15 07:32 PM
5

The court bases alimony off the need of one spouse and the ability of the other to pay. Holy fuck, thats right out of the Marxist playbook: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need". No wonder people are getting reluctant to marry, that sounds right like voluntarily moving to a communist country.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 05:02 AM
2

you will eventually have to marry someone you trust. In 5 years, that someone you trust can change their mind. At your expense. exactly what makes sense for a man who doesn't want a family. Every man wants a family. But the question is how much he wants it, since everything in life has a price tag attached. The price of having a family has been increased so much, that less and less men are willing to buy.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 04:52 AM
12

Another nice quote from Jim Jefferies: Its fucking easy to be a slut. It is fucking hard... to be a stud. To be a stud you have to be witty, charming, well-dressed, have nice shoes and a fake job. To be a slut you just have to be... there.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/15 07:41 PM
2

What im supposed to do with this group of people from now on? Avoid them like the plague. Their presence is poison for your self conscience. Imagine being a rape victim trying to change your "status" while your rapist is present. This is impossible. Once the pecking order is firmly established, it is impossible to change it. Like in India, you cannot simply leave your caste. Your only chance is to leave them alltogether and start with a clean slate.
/r/becomeaman26/07/15 06:32 PM
5

I just don't think its cool to fuck another dudes wife In a perfect world, it surely wouldnt be. TRP though, is a product of the disintegration and downfall of the western civilisation. If the world you know is going to end anyway and be replaced by cultures with more traditional and robust family ties, why not enjoy the easy downhill ride?
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 05:13 AM
1

irrational beliefs people are capable of How do you know those are really sincere "beliefs" and not outright lies?
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 09:29 PM
7

It is nicely explained here: "It is easy to be a slut. It is hard to be a stud." As it is negative for women to have a high n, the same way it is negative for men to have a low n, because for men increasing n effort is required, the same way for women effort is required to stay chaste, i.e. to keep n down. It is not a double standard in the sense that high-effort achievements is what makes both sexes attractive, and the inability to achieve is considered unattractive.
/r/RedPillWomen01/01/15 06:49 PM
-2

I hate religion. Define religion. Everybody is religious in some way. You are too. Some people are just confident enough to admit it, while others try to appear inscrutable by concealing it.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 05:29 AM
1

I wouldnt even call it conservative, its rather biological common sense, similar to redpill opposing feminism. Gays cannot procreate, know their genes are doomed and therefore are unable to think long-term and have a very high time preference. They wont have kids, therefore they need the state to help them, so they favor enforced communism and communists favor them. They have a natural shortage of sexual partners, therefore they are trying to turn other people's kids gay, which deprieves those o…
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 05:16 AM
3

She had nothing to gain (imo) by telling me half of her escapades She absolutely has: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidence_trick
/r/TheRedPill14/12/13 08:57 AM
6

TRP doesn't exactly have the best reputation, to put it mildly. Why is this? It goes against the narrative. It is politicaly incorrect. From wikipedia: the term was a colloquialism used in the early-to-mid 20th century by Communists and Socialists in political debates, referring pejoratively to the Communist "party line", which provided for "correct" positions on many matters of politics.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/13 06:49 PM
2

donwvote the trolls looking for reactions.. upvote genuine discussions. What if there are more trolls than genuine RP posters? The up/down voting mechanism, which is a form of democracy, breaks down in case of a mass invasion. This applies not just to subreddits, but to any company, religion or country: Democracy only works if the voters are largerly homogeneous and disagree merely on details. To get to that desireable state and avoid the state of perpetual conflict, you actually do need to enfo…
/r/TheRedPill27/11/13 07:06 PM
8

As noted somewhere in the comments, this report also doesnt consider divorce or subsequent remarriages at all, it counts the first marriage only.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/13 10:03 PM
7

Most likely there never was a guy who wrote this question in the first place. The question is probably just made up to justify the propaganda piece contained in the answer. We cannot judge Abby for lying like that, the patriarchy forced her to do it.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/13 11:31 AM
3

I do not care about a persons sexual history A persons sexual history allows a prediction of a persons sexual future. If a person showed to enjoy promiscuity for a longer period of time, especially the 10-15 years of her youth that formed her adult character, it is simply dumb to expect that this person can suddenly flip a switch and change, especially well into adulthood long after the character forming phase. They might be forced to pretend to settle because of the decreasing attractivity, but…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/13 11:11 AM
3

She obviously had something that attracted him enough to marry her. One of these points was the claimed low number of previous partners.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/13 10:56 AM
11

women better learn to lap up or they better learn to swim From their POV, a better strategy is to have a number of white knights around to simply force other men into submission. Men aren't signing up for the Titanic Tax anymore; I'm not sure that men at large voluntarily signed up for the Titanic Tax on the Titanic either. On the HMS Birkenhead, where the famous quote "Women and children first" originates from, the men were ordered at gunpoint to stay on ship in order to not endanger the lifesa…
/r/TheRedPill17/11/13 04:27 PM
6

and as they shout, "marry us!" we will whisper back, "no". And then they'll vote for even more socialism and collectively marry Big Daddy Goverment. And Big Daddy will make you pay for the consequences of their bad choices either directly through allimony and child support or indirectly through welfare. As long as the grasshoppers can democratically force the ants to help them, they will abuse the system as much as they can. The Ant and the Grasshopper
/r/TheRedPill17/11/13 04:00 PM
2

She's the equivalent of a guy talking to a group of people about how much money he makes and how many hot bitches he fucks. No. She is the equivalent of a guy talking about how broke he is and how he had no sex for 7 years now.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/13 09:48 PM
10

Better moderation? This is my guess. Controversial boards wouldnt survive a day without draconian moderation. Leftists have mastered the art of organized mass infiltration, false flags, bait-n-switch, ganging up, "stealthily destroying from the inside" and long cons too well that you could hope that the board equivalent of a free market would correct itself over the long term. The ages of intellectual honesty are long over, we're back to dirty ideological warfare where everything is allowed. ANY…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/13 10:34 AM
1

But the answer to your problems isn't to be jealous of rich people. They are not inherently jealous. They merely dont want rich people to be able to write laws to benefit rich people. The same way we dont want poor people on welfare to be able to vote for more welfare. The excessively rich are rigging the game too, just like Marxists are. They both are extremes on opposing side of the spectrum. Basically whoever wins any sort of power sooner or later tries to rewrite the rules in his favor. And …
/r/TheRedPill02/11/13 09:20 AM
1

Responsibility to what?
/r/TheRedPill01/11/13 08:19 AM
2

her "rights" over the non-existent child? It is her right over her body. Yeah real equal responsibility there. You have equal rights before conception, both can decide whether they want to risk a child or not. Everything that happens after sex and pre-birth is solely the womans right to decide solely for the fact that it happens inside her. After birth both should have equal rights and responsibilities, etc. But NOT during pregnancy. It is her damn body.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/13 08:17 AM
0

then they should have an equal say on if the child gets aborted Not in a million years. You're as extreme as any random crazy feminist trying to change basic biology by law. You'll have to persuade a LOT of people to change laws to allow Soviet-style forced abortions. Crazy masculinists make TRP look bad as crazy feminists look womens rights movement look bad.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/13 08:12 AM
-1

but you can force a man to be a slave for 18 years should she decide to. Not she, he decided to support a child by ejaculating into her.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/13 11:34 PM
2

It would be beneficial if you left religion out of the discussion.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/13 09:40 PM
-1

"Forcibly abort" is only a valid logical position if you abolish bodily integrity first, but I dont think the majority of people outside of Saudi Arabia would want that. The problem of child fairness can be solved in countless other ways, "lets force women to abort" is stupidity of stalinesque proportions. One of the major talking points of TRP is that men and women are not equal. And they arent. If all of reproduction happens inside the womans body, you can not pretend that men should have equa…
/r/TheRedPill31/10/13 09:34 PM
-5

What if the man wants to keep the child? He should impregnate a woman that wants to keep the child and avoid women that dont. His right over the child disappears. No, the right over the child only appears after the child is born. Before the child is born, there is no child so you can not have rights over it. It is just an amorphous bunch of cells in somebody else's body. You dont have any rights over amorphous cells that are a part of somebody else's body. the man has LITERALLY NO SAY throughout…
/r/TheRedPill31/10/13 08:32 PM
-7

No. After he shoots his load, he agrees to support the child that the load might turn into. He makes this agreement by shooting the load. He doesnt have to shoot the load AND make some formal written statement of intent in the presence of a lawyer. Shooting the load is a sufficient agreement. He might think otherwise to wiggle out of the obligation he fathered, but many many many ("many" as in "law-making democracy") other people disagree. So if he shoots his load, he will be forced to pay one w…
/r/TheRedPill31/10/13 08:25 PM
-15

a man has absolutely no say in whether or not a woman gets an abortion The man has 100% say in whether he is going to shoot his load into that woman. Nobody is ever going to question his individual reproductive right. The same way a woman has 100% say in whether she will allow a man to shoot his load into her. Similarly, nobody is going to ever question her individual reproductive right. If a load has been shot, both participants have agreed to suffer the consequences. The man agreed to pay, the…
/r/TheRedPill31/10/13 07:51 PM
2

You're only able to pull that off in already prosperous, stable societies where there is an effective rule of law that allows you to game the system without consequences while everybody knows that you are gaming them but cannot do anything. In any case of societal breakdown where the protective "civilisational" shield can not be upheld, such tensions would instantly snap and you would be the first to be put against the wall. Thats explains the soaring success of feminism in places like Sweden an…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/13 09:00 PM
5

modern feminism is just rebranded Marxism. "Feminism is communism with tits." (source unknown, I've got it from Stefan Molyneux)
/r/TheRedPill30/10/13 07:28 PM
24

Especially after somebody else built it first. Notice how they dont incentivize the students to "write a feminist Wikipedia" or even "write feminist articles", that would be too much effort with little chance of succeeding. Aggressive infiltration of already existing structures is the leftist's tool of choice. They are very aware of the fact that they can not compete directly. They've for example, already successfully infiltrated both the university system and the media, both of which they didnt…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/13 06:30 AM
13

The OP can thank the blown guy. He demonstrated to the OP that what he thought was his faithful girlfriend was a disguised slut. Some fucking decency What for? If it wasnt for him, OP would have invested even more resources into her and she would have blown somebody else sooner or later. He just helped the OP dodge a bullet. Like women shit-test men, men have to slut-test women, directly or indirectly by having somebody else test her fidelity and LTR-value. If the woman fails, you dont shoot the…
/r/TheRedPill29/10/13 11:04 PM
5

What do I do? Dominate. At the moment it looks like she is calling all the shots, and you're just passively responding to whatever she does, and you are desperate to respond correctly. You are like a tennis player not even trying to win, but desperately trying not to lose. If you dont want to or are unable to dominate, she will. And then she will get bored and eventually look for somebody else to dominate her. She just said it was a test Likely not the kind of test you think. I'm not going to ca…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/13 11:39 PM
5

For the sake of completeness, here is the direct link to the HN discussion of the article.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/13 09:23 PM
4

the 80/20 rule is everywhere in nature. I doubt it differs here. It is called the Pareto principle: "named after Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto, who observed in 1906 that 80% of the land in Italy was owned by 20% of the population"
/r/TheRedPill25/10/13 08:20 PM
3

Because the young single men that 30 year olds want(this is the important part) don't want 30 year olds when they can have 18-21. Also the young single men that the 30 yr olds want dont want the 30 yr olds that didnt want guys like them when they were 18-21.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/13 08:12 PM
2

In Germany, until 2-3 years ago, paternity testing without the consent of the mother wasnt only impossible, but illegal.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/13 06:13 AM
5

Women have went and destroyed what men took millennia to build a backbone of society on. I dont think that it is actually women who did that purely on their own. The current situation is not of that much benefit to them, since many more of them end up as unmarried, childless, lonely spinsters than before. If women created that situation, you'd assume that by now old 68ist childless cum dumpsters realized that the carousel isnt worth it in the long run and initiated a massive RP-like counter move…
/r/TheRedPill24/10/13 05:56 AM
12

That being said, lose it to an escort. Dont. You dont get a confidence boost from that, it is like admitting a defeat, it is as encouraging as paying to breathe. Just so you can truthfully say you This is exactly what he shouldnt do, care about "truthfulness". Fuck truth, everybody out there is lying. Caring about truth is what brought him into his situation in the first place. It is better if he learns how to lie and to detect how and when other people lie. You need to master the art of lying a…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 02:01 PM
3

I guess it is a combination of two things: The temptation of easy available sex is too big to resist, when the only short-term alternative is porn and masturbation. They may be generally interested in a LTR, but have been interacting mostly with sluts before and developed a "all women are sluts" mind set, the equivalent of the female "where have the good men gone?". I'm not defending these attitudes, this is just my understanding of the underlying dynamic. You'd think that a person genuinely int…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 01:13 PM
6

I do not, for instance, advocate gaming and seduction, I don't think it's healthy to pursue casual sex, and I'm especially opposed to the subreddit's forever-single credo. I've been reading here for a while now, and my feeling is that most people in here have either been married and burned and now operate in "never again" mode, or want to commit and marry but are unable to find trustworthy marriage material among all the cum dumpsters, and are just playing the game and fucking around in order to…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 12:50 PM
4

Marriage has always been at the detriment of man. Not, it was a truce between the sexes. Man forfeits their privilege to bang as many women as they can in order to protect one partner for life in return; The same way a woman forfeits her privilege to get impregnated by the highest quality males in order to protect one beta provider for life. man is granted frequent, unprohibited access to joys of sex and children. In return she is granted financial security and the financial security of her chil…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 12:21 PM
1

Why would I need to have my vows witnessed by a) someone from the state i don't believe in b) someone from the church i don't believe in? Because historically, having everybody in the community know that you are married would make cheating and divorcing extremely difficult. Having the state/church as witnesses is a meaningless ritual since the state decided to neither punish infidelity nor (female) no-fault divorcing.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 09:30 AM
4

hat they generally wouldn't say in the presence of women in real life Which is the main reason the real life situation is bad in the first place. As some philosopher said: "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 09:22 AM
6

Dread, remember that word. Which is why marriage is a losing proposition: She can leave you, but you cant legally "leave" her. The amount of dread has been selectively removed from one side of the balance scale, and the former historical equilibrium is gone for good. People are only slowly starting to recognize that the new deal is rigged and that even if it makes them sad, they have to walk away and readapt.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 08:50 AM
-1

feminism has destroyed women, both overtly and covertly. It is not feminism. Feminsm is just a tool. The underlying ideology driving the (negative) cultural changes in the west is good ol' Marxism. They are not targetting women or men in particular, but the entire western culture because they blamed it for the failure of communism. Google for "Frankfurt school" and the "long march through the institutions".
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 08:27 AM
1

Do you think marriage is ever worth it? No. If fidelity isnt legally enforced but commitment is legally enforced, the contract is unilateral and therefore silly. Can you believe in love and subscribe to TRP at the same time? You dont have to "believe" in love, love is just another biological mechanism at work. Being aware of TRP doesnt stop your biology from working. Is shit testing conscious or subconscious or a little of both? Both. As is slut testing, the male equivalent. Is shit testing bad …
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 08:10 AM
3

trouble coming up with any consistent benefits at all The point of marriage is to make child rearing easier and more attractive. It wasnt ever meant to benefit the married couple directly, but primarily the society at large, because a society dies out if the birth rates fall below replacement levels. And if you dont subscribe to some form of communism, stable long-term marriages are still the most efficient way to produce new people.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/13 02:38 PM
19

The purpose of a marriage is to make it difficult to leave. The original purpose was to make it both difficult to leave and difficult to cheat. But society at some point in time decided not to enforce fidelity any more, which made marriage a unilateral contract, rather nonsensical for the single signee.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/13 02:27 PM
4

Erich Fromm was a member of the "Frankfurt School", which laid the philosophical foundations of modern day Cultural Marxism, Feminism, female promiscuity, single motherhood, welfare state, attacked the traditional monogamous relationships, marriage, family structures, etc. It is kinda funny to see marxist quotes in TRP, considering that TRP is a "reaction" to problems caused by marxist social engineering.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/13 04:27 PM
8

The long term goal of communism has always been detaching children from their parents and putting them under control/indoctrination of the party/state. "Empowering" women with feminism first and then requiring always increasing levels of welfare to save all those single-mother kids from inevitable poverty are the tools leftists have always used to destabilize western nuclear family based societies and to break the christian "cultural hegemony". They want everybody to "think of all the poor child…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/13 06:08 AM
14

Molyneux has a lot of videos on this topic, go through his YT channel Why men dont want to get married The Life and Death of Radical Feminism Feminism Is Socialism with Panties? Why are women so unhappy? A modest theory How to meet a nice girl... Women on Pedestals Can Only Fall... The Men's Movement and the Continued Search for Equality Miley Cyrus and the Slutwalk of Family Collapse etc. The guy is a goldmine on countless topics.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/13 06:42 PM
1

Why are you so dead-set against giving men autonomy? Because the child should have the right to be supported by both of its parents, regardless of whether the parents want it or not. If the child is alive, there should be no way for a parent to wiggle out of child support. If you risked producing a child by unprotected ejaculation, you shouldnt be able to retroactively avoid the consequences of taking that risk.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 10:47 PM
5

That a man who cums inside a woman is consenting to possibly taking care of a kid for the next 18 years? Yes. A woman does also if she allows a man to ejaculate inside her. But since it is her body, she can later just remove it from her body. She has more than one option. The man can't because it is not his body. His options end at the point of ejaculation.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 09:53 PM
1

A woman has a panoply of options to avoid getting pregnant or terminating a pregnancy that they don't want. We're not talking about what women want or dont want. We were talking about men who first consent to a possible conception by ejaculating into a woman, but then retroactively want to get out of that consent. What options do men have? They have the exact same options women have, to risk or not to risk a conception by unprotected intercourse. putting a rubber sleeve on your dick that makes s…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 07:51 PM
3

he has nothing to gain by continuing to support the woman in question. He can increase the likelihood of his progeny's survival. Evolution wise he'd be better served by finding another woman to get pregnant and dumping her too. Evolution wise it only makes sense if you can count on somebody else raising your progeny. until so many bastards are left behind that his genes will survive for many many generations to come. If you just dump your semen on random women, none of your kids might actually s…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 07:34 PM
1

What if a woman lies about taking birth control Who cares what somebody else said or didnt say? If you ejaculated into a woman without a condom you consented to a possible conception. What if a woman steals sperm from a condom Statistically insignificant fringe cases.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 07:11 PM
2

Because women can. Whining that life's not fair and trying to force some kind of whiny "fairness" on biology is stupid. It is exactly what feminists marxists are doing by requiring society to pay for their alpha bastards. of the fact that the entire labor that finances child support comes from the male body Men should stop voting for socialists then. Feminazis couldnt force socialism on working men to finance their alpha-based single-mother reproduction scheme without the help of the majority of…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 06:15 PM
4

What I support is giving a man an option post-conception. A simple question: Why? He already consented by ejaculating, why should he have the (unnatural, TRP is usually proud to be realist about evolutionary biology) option to later change his mind and force the woman to either abort or bear the whole responsiblity? What benefit would the society get by allowing men to play games with impregnating a girl first and then changing their mind?
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 05:52 PM
4

Given that men have no decision making power over the birth of the child They have no decision making power over a pregnancy for the simple fact that they cant get pregnant. Only those people who can get pregnant should have decison making power over their pregnancy. All men can have decison making power over is ejaculation, because after that point, the process runs outside of their and inside of somebody else's body. no bearing whatsoever on the debate of post-conception rights and responsibil…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 05:43 PM
4

Why does all the responsibility land on the man's shoulders. It doesnt. Both the man and the woman have to option to opt in or out before conception. The fact that the resulting pregnancy can be ended by the person carrying the pregnancy in her body is irrelevant to the fact the before the pregnancy, both of them fully consented to a possible conception by having unprotected intercourse.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 04:53 PM
1

and men have no say in their decision. This is a simple consequence of the fact that it is not their body. They already consented to a pregnancy by ejaculating into the mother. Do you seriously not understand why this is unfair? Do you seriously not understand that this unfairness is a consequence of the fact that the entire pregnancy happens inside the female body? Why is it "unfair" that a man can not retroactively object to something he already consented to? Before condomless ejaculation, bot…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 04:15 PM
-5

YES men should be able to opt out. Men already are able to opt out by not ejaculating into the mother.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 04:03 PM
2

They'll be leaded by strong, masculine bull-dykes. No, they won't. Scandinavia will be taken over by Islam long before any desired results of their leftist social engineering experiments appear. They are not only reprogramming their men to become unattractive for their own women, they are simultaneously rendeing them unable to defend themselves against the already proceeding hostile takeover. Scandinavia as we know it is already gone, the only thing to hope is that their demise will come fast an…
/r/TheRedPill25/09/13 06:10 PM
8

The other TRP movie I found yesterday through the Sarah Silvermen thread is "Take this waltz". It also stars Michelle Williams (again spending half of the movie naked to emphasize the adultness and seriousness of the role), basically repeating her role from Blue Valentine: A 28 yr old freelance writer gets bored with her beta husband, fucks a rickshaw driving neighbour, leaves the beta for the rickshaw, then gets bored with him too and then figures out that she should have stayed with the provid…
/r/TheRedPill17/09/13 04:04 PM
0

And by the way, the movie she has those not really great nude scenes in, "Take this waltz", is pure TRP material.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/13 10:32 PM
0

The girl who claims to be a virgin is no better than the girl who spent every weekend on the frat house pool table- until proven otherwise. If you mean better as in LTR material, then the first one can receive an initial benefit of doubt while you are busy estimating whether she is deceiving you or not. But you can disqualify the second one as LTR material from the get go, since the likelihood that she will be missing those pool tables she grew so accustomed with is simply too great. There is no…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/13 10:18 PM
3

I don't judge a book by its cover. No one is guilty by association. The point of being an intelligent life form is the ability to recognize patterns and make predictions based on those patterns. You absolutely can roughly judge a book by its cover and you absolutely can judge people by association.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/13 07:28 PM
4

no matter what her past was. Isnt the default premise of this subreddit that you can somewhat accurately predict a slut's future from her past? If there is a mile long line of dicks in her past, it is rather likely that your dick wont be the last dick in that line, which makes her no LTR material no matter how much she wants to prove the opposite. Let her show you that she's worth your time The point of TRP, as I understood it, is that her past already shows how much you should value her present…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/13 07:23 PM
1

What you dont seem to get is that the very notion that a double standard does exist and that it is valid and that many men would not like to have a slut for a LTR is already perceived and decried as slut shaming. The moment you admit you know about TRP and are OK with its premise and would reject a woman with a high count you're a slut shamer.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/13 09:42 PM
1

cock riding and casual sex have reduced their prime asset in finding a mate/provider. Enjoy it while it lasts ladies. At the same time, cock carousels increase the number of unmarried betas thirsting for attention from a used-up-and-finally-ready-to-settle-down former cock rider. It is just a conjecture that town bicycles are statistically actually losing out in the end. Maybe, just maybe, they do get the best of both worlds, and only the beta loses out twice in the process, by getting no action…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/13 07:07 PM
1

they'd have a huge drop in rape cases. And birth rates. Countries with a low sex price are having so much of it, that they are forgetting what it originally was meant for, i.e. procreation, so they are fucking themselves to death, quite literally.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/13 07:01 PM
1

No substitute for contact with a warm body. It is not always a substitute, but it is often enough a substitute to have a significant influence on the overall need/power balance.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/13 06:55 PM
0

have a natural human right to a whole and intact body. That natural human right to a whole and intact body is Antisemitic.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 07:04 PM
1

What I don't understand is why the fuck she criticises VB Because it made using Windows and programming too easy so a lot of non-programmers actually used it and stole a bunch of jobs from self proclaimed pros who would otherwise incomprehensibly clusterfuck it in C++ to make their own jobs indispensable.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 06:14 PM
1

Wheres the line between red lipstick, red blush, dying gray hair, push up bras and outright lying?
/r/TheRedPill09/09/13 10:10 PM
1

its well known that women wear makeup. Its part of our culture. Men boasting, bragging, showing off and generally acting more masculine, alpha, tough and successful than they really are is even more ingrained in basically every culture under the sun. Basically both sides are doing their best to cheat, just not the same way.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 10:34 AM
0

why the find it to be an annoying trait in women? Of course because it leads to a great number of women being attractive but simply unavailable for them, being "out of their league". But this goes both ways: The same people bitching about hypergamy would also probably reject a number of women whom they would consider out of their league, for example older women who had a great number of sexual partners. I would say that hypergamy isnt annoying, it is rather simply frustrating if you are on the l…
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 02:17 PM
1

this slut shaming stuff is very beta. Every dishonest shaming is low. Rejecting a slut for a relationship because you simply do not like sluts is just being honest with them.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 06:57 PM
4

having a lot if partners always makes women worse at relationships Nope. It makes them less attractive for relationships, for the same reasons prostitutes and porn stars are unattractive as relationship partners, even if you do watch porn and go to prostitutes. Whether any of them actually would be good or bad in the relationship is secondary.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 06:52 PM
8

What's wrong with women sleeping around when they're single? For various sexual-psycholgical reasons, a significant number of guys simply do not like it and there is no way for a woman to change the fact that they do not like it, the same way men cant change what women like in men. It is a zero sum game: As a woman, you can not be everybody's fuck toy and someone's marriage material at the same time. The more valuable you are in the short term (if you are a town bicycle) the less valuable you ar…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 03:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter