TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mxzf Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by mxzf on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

I'm not sure, but I think being fired with-cause disqualifies you in most of the US. I think. It's kinda uncommon for people to be fired with-cause in the US though, since you need to have a pretty solidly documented case against them (compared to just firing them without cause).
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/21 01:28 AM
1

This xkcd is pretty relevant
/r/seduction08/12/20 01:42 PM
1

Sure, a lot can. But remember that it's a modifier for other charges. So, you have to be doing something arrest-worthy with the intent to deprive someone of their rights in order to be hit by it. That's the kind of thing where I don't object to coming down hard on it because it takes willful intent to deprive someone of their rights, that's not something you just do by accident.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/20 02:37 AM
1

It would appear so. And, honestly, I really don't see anything wrong with bumping up the charges against someone for committing criminal acts for the purposes of violating someone's rights. It seems, to me, that committing a crime to violate or repress someone else's rights is inherently worse than doing it out of greed or anything else like that.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/20 01:38 AM
3

Ah, it does look like that might be the case. The vague pronoun threw me.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/20 12:15 AM
5

DE also counts preventing people from exercising their rights as hate crimes. That's what this is realistically covered by.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/20 12:12 AM
4

In DE, hate crimes also include preventing people from exercising their rights. Including, in this case, freedom of expression.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/20 12:10 AM
4

In DE, hate crimes also cover preventing someone from exercising their rights; in this case, they were infringing on the kid's freedom of expression.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/20 12:08 AM
3

In DE, they also extend to preventing people from exercising their rights, including freedom of expression.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/20 12:05 AM
21

In DE, "hate crimes" also extends to things preventing the free exercise of someone's rights. In this case, the right to free speech through wearing whatever you want to.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/20 12:01 AM
8

How'd the hat get onto the ground in the first place? I'll bet that has more to do with the charges than picking it up did.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/20 11:59 PM
0

What's "heroic" about stealing a hat from a kid?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/20 11:55 PM
1

It varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction (so, state-to-state in the US and country/etc to country elsewhere), but there are a number of rape definitions that include wording that specifies penetrating the victim. In those jurisdictions, if it's charged at all, it'll generally be sexual assault instead of rape (which is also the category that groping falls under, so a lot less severe than the rape it is).
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/20 10:48 PM
11

Given that it was nothing but a sign, then it's definitely nothing that restricts a woman's rights. As it turns out, signs themselves don't restrict any rights, they're just signs.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/20 05:35 PM
4

She can't be convicted of raping, due to local laws. But there's a difference between the verb "rape" and being legally convicted of rape in a jurisdiction.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/20 05:00 PM
17

Well, women can rape men anywhere. I think what you meant to say "where women can be convicted of raping a man".
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/20 04:11 PM
12

Yeah, there are a few subs in that sphere of influence that have bots which watch other subreddits they dislike and proactively ban people who post in places they dislike (doesn't matter what you post, the simple fact that you posted there at all is enough for them to want to ban you). TwoX is one of the more well-known perpetrators, but there are a couple dozen subs that follow that same behavior. They tend to be fairly toxic subs overall though, so you're not really missing much if that happen…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/19 12:04 PM
13

If it wasn't single-occupancy, then it'd be even weirder, since she didn't lock the door and guy #1 just did his business and left.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 02:52 AM
32

Which is not at all traumatic or damaging or anything whatsoever bad for the child.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 03:59 PM
4

No, to my knowledge UBI generally refers to "everyone gets enough baseline money to pay for food/housing/utilities". People would make more from jobs that pay better, but everyone would have at least enough to live on. I'm not an expert on the topic or anything, I just happen to have heard the term and was telling you what the initialism means.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 11:31 PM
1

Universal Basic Income
/r/MensRights24/11/17 11:17 PM
2

I'd be surprised if that's the case. That kind of simple market analytics is fairly standard for large chains like that.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/17 12:13 PM
9

Not to mention that a given store likely weights their inventory by what they sell. I imagine a CVS in a predominantly black area will have a very different ratio of makeup shades compared to one in a predominantly white area.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 09:44 PM
2

Probably supposed to be "wasn't his".
/r/MensRights19/08/17 06:05 PM
3

I would worry that there might be a more fundamental flaw in her mentality if she thought that kind of behavior was acceptable in the first place. Maybe not firing right off the bat, but definitely at least a seminar on discrimination, if not a full class on the subject; definitely more than just a short conversation telling her that it wasn't ok.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 10:04 PM
9

Well, it does have humans controlling it, so there are innate flaws right there. In the end though, there comes a point where you have to weigh risk vs reward. When it comes down to it, pretty much everyone is willing to accept the reasonably low risk of an accident in return for the ability to cross large distances in a reasonably quick manner.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 08:14 PM
80

Sure, but that doesn't mean that marriage is intrinsically flawed. Getting into a car crash only comes after you get in the car in the first place, but that doesn't mean you never drive a car for fear of crashing.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 04:56 PM
37

That seems like a fundamental problem in and of itself.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:58 PM
50

It really depends on the context. The post reads "today almost as soon as I began work she confronted me about it, so naturally, I responded saying that if she gave a shit about women's issues, she'd be more than supportive of my decision". Reading between the lines, I imagine the conversation went something like this: Boss: Hey, you didn't show up yesterday or call in, what happened? Girl: I was at the woman's march, of course. Boss: That's not a valid reason for missing work and not even calli…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/17 03:50 PM
3

She has a job, working 2 days a week as a "beauty therapist".
/r/MensRights08/02/17 02:59 AM
7

Given that this story reports amounts in GBP, I'm guessing their agreements with the UK would matter more than any with the US.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 02:52 AM
1

Well, I think homicidal teachers is its own separate issue with the education system and probably needs to be addressed aside from the discriminatory pledging situation.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 06:08 PM
1

Yeah, I might have refused as a kid. It would mostly depend on if I recognized that it was wrong and discriminatory, since I might have just seen it as a sensible thing that I was never going to break anyways. The stubbornness to protest I had plenty of though, that's part of why I was homeschooled, because I knew enough to know when someone was wrong about something but not enough to back down from a frustrated teacher.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 05:49 PM
8

Of course, you wouldn't want to hurt her by resisting being murdered. /s
/r/MensRights21/10/16 07:13 PM
1

It depends on the kid. I doubt either of us knows enough about /u/awesomemanswag's childhood to know exactly what they would have done.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 07:08 PM
17

Quick Googling indicates a 180d statute of limitations. However, if they did this kind of thing once, they're likely to do it repeatedly, so there are probably more recent offenses too.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 07:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter