~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74 | "Rape is a young man's crime. It's a bit of a performance for them, showing off to each other how macho they are. We need to teach our young men that you can be masculine in ways that do not involve violence and degrading women" | myblockcheck | /r/MensRights | 18/04/12 02:33 PM | |
| 1 | Women mistreat children more than men? | myblockcheck | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 02:56 AM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| – | Feminine math and science role models do not motivate girlsSo.. one of the main reasons women are underrepresented in STEM fields is because of women themselves and NOT men? Another feminist rhetorical device defeated. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/12 07:36 PM |
| 1 | Comparison of medical research funding by the U.S. National Institute of Health: female vs. maleFrom looking at their Website, it seems that the most of it is on cardiovascular research with the main reason being that standard cardiovascular research is done from the male POV. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/12 02:26 PM |
| – | Comparison of medical research funding by the U.S. National Institute of Health: female vs. maleThat does not show what the NIH's funding is used for in that category. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/12 12:23 PM |
| 1 | Comparison of medical research funding by the U.S. National Institute of Health: female vs. maleSo you're saying being able to reduce birth defects, still births, and other birth complications doesn't help male babies? | /r/MensRights | 26/04/12 05:54 AM |
| – | Comparison of medical research funding by the U.S. National Institute of Health: female vs. maleThis is kind of useless. Women pay more in insurance premiums than do men because women in their child bearing years have to visit the doctor more often. Also, funding women's health (i.e., child birth) helps men too as they're 50% as likely to come out of the woman's vagina :) | /r/MensRights | 26/04/12 03:09 AM |
| – | Is marriage even necessary anymore?uh, no. You were debunked. Easily. | /r/MensRights | 18/04/12 05:29 AM |
| – | Is marriage even necessary anymore?It's funny, you're so bad at reading stats and facts, it's not even funny. Can I ask you a question? Did you go to a 3rd tier university? It's quite clear that you did. Read the links I showed you. They easily point out how to derive the divorce rate from those numbers. I'm sure you won't undrestand it, though. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 11:12 PM |
| – | Is marriage even necessary anymore?The number of people who are or have been divorced is not the same data as the rate of divorce. People can be divorced multiple times That's not what you stated. You stated the article discusses "divorced rate", not "divorce rate". (3.4 divided by 6.8 is 0.5 - that's 50%) No, because that stat discusses per population, not per marriage. Big difference. The marriage rate is also over total population, while the other one isn't. It's easy to play dumb, but it doesn't work. Facts are facts. http://… | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 11:02 PM |
| – | Is marriage even necessary anymore?No, it's not. You can't determin the divorce rate without a measurement over a period of time. You have no government studies, or even credit studies from research institutes, to support your dogma. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 09:07 PM |
| 1 | Warrant issued for man's arrest for dipping out on bad date and her leeching tag-a-longs who expected him to payVerbal contracts do hold legal standing. Other statements of intent, such as written messages do hold grounds too. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 06:52 AM |
| – | Is marriage even necessary anymore?Okay, but your relationship WILL end. She wants marriage. She's just waiting out for you to see if you can change your mind. Seriously. I know from personal experience. She's just waiting. The time will come when she's going to get fed up and it's all over. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 06:24 AM |
| – | Is marriage even necessary anymore?This pretty much shows what MRAs are. Just a bunch of wimpy nannyboys who have been dicked over too many times because they're too beta. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 06:19 AM |
| – | Is marriage even necessary anymore?So in other words, you're just too afraid to take a risk. The risk was not worth the woman. Rest assured, your relationship will end bitterly anyways; she can't avoid her marriage itch forever. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 06:18 AM |
| – | Is marriage even necessary anymore?1) The divorce rate is NOT 50%. It's much much lower. 2) I don't see much logic behind marriage, outside of religion, anyways. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 06:12 AM |
| 1 | Sperm donor liable for child support, judge rules.?? | /r/MensRights | 16/04/12 12:35 PM |
| 1 | Sperm donor liable for child support, judge rules.That's not proof of conflict. Yes it is. "Dad" means biological male parent to me It doesn't matter what it means to you. If you look at the definition of dad or father, it is not strictly limited to the biological parent. He wanted to be involved in their lives. But that doesn't mean he wanted to be financially responsible for them. He's financially responsible for the kid because he fathered the child willingly, put his name on the birth certificate, and took on the roll of a parent. Had he do… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/12 12:34 PM |
| 5 | Sperm donor liable for child support, judge rules.Why is he obligated to pay anything as the legal parent? That's the legal obligation with having a child. Don't want to pay anything, don't have a child. The laws are well known. There are already two other legal parents paying for the kid. The other woman has no obligation unless she formally adopts the child; she's no different than any other step parent. The step parent shouldn't be responsible for the child and they rarely are. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 08:11 PM |
| 3 | Sperm donor liable for child support, judge rules.Working Families Party is not a feminist party, at all. Progressivism is just simply following what science and research shows us to be true and rejecting the old and dogmatic. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 08:10 PM |
| 1 | Sperm donor liable for child support, judge rules.I think we've established - beyond a reasonable doubt - that, yes, he did indeed put his name on the birth certificate because he is in fact the father. He does not wish to dispute that fact. Sperm donor's do not put their names on birth certificates. Why? Because they are not required to be a parent to the child. By putting your name on the birth certificate, you certify that you are the parent. [CITATION REQUIRED] He wrote letters to the kid calling himself "dad". Why would a simple donor ever… | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 02:19 PM |
| 0 | Sperm donor liable for child support, judge rules.Exactly. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 02:16 PM |
| 6 | Sperm donor liable for child support, judge rules.It doesn't matter, at all, how many parents the kid has, the "donor" (read: father) actually involved himself in the child's life. He actually told the child he was his "dad". He signed his name on the birth certificate, declaring himself the legal parent. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 02:16 PM |
| 1 | Sperm donor liable for child support, judge rules.Based on the article it seems pretty clear that he had no desire to have any legal responsibility for the child, and what is more that that sentiment was mutual with the mother. No, that's not clear, at all. It's clear he DID intend to be the father, as he wrote the kid letters calling himself "dad", and then put his name on the birth certificate. He decided to be legally responsible when he put his name on the birth certificate declaring him a parent of the child. Is he a simple sperm donor, no… | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 02:14 PM |
| 3 | Sperm donor liable for child support, judge rules.Because he thought the ladies would honor their agreement and the legal system would treat him fairly. No, that's bullshit. He did it because he wanted to be his father. If you wanted to simply be a donor, you don't intervene in the kids life and you don't put your name on the birth certificate and you don't do it outside of the system that is legally in place. If he planned to honor his agreement, and just be a donor, he wouldn't have wrote letters to the kid calling himself "dad", and he would… | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 02:12 PM |
| 4 | Sperm donor liable for child support, judge rules.Not only that, there's no proof of such oral agreement. Also, since there's no formal organization or contract in this instance, it opens up the window of allowing people to coerce the other parent into giving up parental rights. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 06:11 AM |
| 1 | PA Court forces husband to impregnate wife during divorce via IVF.Those are two seperate choices and each requires consent. You're making stuff up again, cuckold. There is even a clause to reinforce this idea. Really? Show me one existed in this case. like making out is giving up sex... So says the cuckold who's trying to say "agreeing to give your sperm and then changing your mind after fertilization == spermjacking". | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 05:19 AM |
| 1 | PA Court forces husband to impregnate wife during divorce via IVF.Each step requires consent regardless of whether he has to act. Now you're just making things up. This is a stupid statement and would justify sperm jacking. No, sperm jacking is when you steal the sperm without the fathers knowledge. The father knew where his sperm was going as he consented to it. Obviously biological parenthood affects people, that's why It doesn't have to. You were the one who argued with me stating that if the father "opts out of the pregnancy the mother can just get an abor… | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 05:19 AM |
| 2 | Sperm donor liable for child support, judge rules.He is the father. He didn't obligate anything. He is the biological father. He put his name on the birth certificate, did he not? He was under no obligation to do that; no sperm donor is. Which contract are you referring to? Well, if he wants to be paid for his services, he should have some contract. That's the way the real world works. You realise such a contract would be unenforceable anyway, right? "The welfare of the child" comes before all else. In a few instances this has happened, maybe, … | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 05:17 AM |
| 5 | Sperm donor liable for child support, judge rules.Um, it's quite simple. the guy agreed to put his name on the birth certificate. Simple sperm donor's don't do that, nor are they required to. This guy chose to go through with the normal process. He clearly had an involvement in the child's life on his own will. Simple sperm donors don't do that. If he had no intention of legally accepting responsibility for this kid, and had no intentions of being a parent to this kid, then why did he put his name on the birth certificate and why did he try to … | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 03:27 AM |
| 4 | Sperm donor liable for child support, judge rules.I don't see why any of that should obligate him to pay child support. It's his kid and he obligated himself to be the father by having his name on the birth certificate as the father. He indeed agreed to have a kid. Shouldn't he be paid for services rendered? Did he sign the contract declaring he should be paid? I don't understand why he's being punished for being a nice person. He didn't sign any contract stating that he's just a sperm donor, this relieving him of his duties. Sperm donors also … | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 03:25 AM |
| – | PA Court forces husband to impregnate wife during divorce via IVF.He's not forced to do anything. He already gave up his embryo and the child is already conceived. He's already done his part, willingly. What happens to the embryo now does not affect him at all. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 02:48 AM |
| 1 | PA Court forces husband to impregnate wife during divorce via IVF.Please show me this destruction clause. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 02:45 AM |
| – | PA Court forces husband to impregnate wife during divorce via IVF.No, actually, he consented to both. That's the way IVF works. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 02:43 AM |
| 1 | PA Court forces husband to impregnate wife during divorce via IVF.He already agreed to give up his material. It's not spermjacking, since he knew he was giving up his genetic material. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 02:42 AM |
| 1 | PA Court forces husband to impregnate wife during divorce via IVF.Conception's already take place. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 02:41 AM |
| 92 | Sperm donor liable for child support, judge rules.Um, not to shit on the circlejerk here, but: the dude agreed to have his NAME on the birth certificate, listing himself as the father. The dude sent money and letters to the child, signing them as "dad". He did not get any documentation, at all, before agreeing to be a sperm donor. Seriously... it's clear the guy's the wishy-washy one here. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 02:03 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter