TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

myboobiezarequitebig Archive

View 0 posts and 225 comments by myboobiezarequitebig on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

Why are we acting like men don’t have the ability to make choices? If you’re dating someone who makes a big deal about getting married but you don’t wanna get married, why are you dating them?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 01:13 PM

Sounds like a skill issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 01:01 PM

Blah, blah, blah. Not getting married is an alternative. Glad we agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 12:59 PM

So, like I said, you don’t actually have to get married though. Correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 12:57 PM

You need to be married to be in a stable relationship? News to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 12:56 PM

Is there a reason why a suitable alternative is to just not marry?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 12:35 PM

Sure, if you ignore circumstance. I personally would not date somebody who’s not in the same tax bracket as myself or does not have the desire to achieve a similar educational background. These are not negative characteristics/triats for individuals I am not planning to fuck or date. Why would they be? Unless we are talking about traits that are universally considered negative. Like lacking hygiene, not being the most financially responsible, being rude, etc. I would argue most people differenti…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 11:37 AM
1

Ok….what does that have to do with what I said? And who said anything about hoes 😭 I didn’t even mention being feminine for the sake of attracting men. Like what are you talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 03:56 AM
2

Sure, I’m not arguing against that. I’m talking about the phenomenon of expecting otherwise traditional values from your partner but not necessarily for your own sex. I don’t really know what point you’re attempting to make here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 10:54 AM
1

Expecting traditional values and behavior from your partner but not yourself is not atypical.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 07:29 PM
10

I’m not disagreeing with you that some men do take it to the extreme. My point is only that this specific topic is gender neutral. Referencing extreme manifestations of shitty men doesn’t really take away from my broader point.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 05:15 PM
8

Let’s forget about my otherwise exaggerated example. You don’t really argue against my point. My example was just to show how something like this can go in the other direction. I think your post would have more of an impact if it was gender neutral.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 05:08 PM
4

Perhaps using a “666 man” is a bit hyperbolic. But, yeah, I’ve met women who are actively seeking a man who will otherwise provide for them despite not being traditional women themselves. It was just an example as I am not attempting to make this a gendered observation. Both men and women do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 05:06 PM
19

> A lot of men spend all their time evaluating women’s value while never considering their own. They want to be treated like the prize without offering enough to justify that treatment and they want women to overlook their flaws while insisting that women must constantly prove their value to them. THAT is what’s unfair. Is this not applicable to when like the most mid woman you have ever met in your life only wants a 666 dude? Right, like I think it’s actually pretty common for people to overest…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 03:53 PM
10

You know, for your specific case, I think people are more so reacting to the fact that you are looking for a fairly uncommon family dynamic.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 12:08 AM
9

The transition from psychedelic laced Jim Bob to somehow women needing a rubric is actually fucking frying me 😭😭
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 08:55 PM
13

You’re changing the subject. I’m asking why you think a woman feeling valued in her relationship requires believing men as a group can’t function without women. You haven’t connected those dots at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 03:48 AM
12

Why would the alternative be admitting that “most men would be fine on their own”? If we’re talking about a relationship, the relevant question is whether your partner values and benefits from what you bring, not whether men as a group can survive without women. That seems like a completely different argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 03:42 AM
1

No, I’m commenting on individuals that either subconsciously or consciously start to view their partner like a parent. The point of marriage is to view your partner like a parent? As someone who is married, I find that kind of odd. But, every marriage is different.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 11:20 AM
12

Didn’t people in general become more avoidant after COVID? I’m too lazy to look it up but I feel like studies have been done on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 10:55 AM
1

Caring for your partner, however, is not what I am commenting on. I’m not really sure what education has to do with anything. I will say though, having some type of education might make it easier to understand my point. Do you need some help in understanding what I’m saying or do you want to continue being offended?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 10:23 AM
13

No, they don’t get special days off. Their requests are being approved. I’m sure if you requested days off when you were sick, they would also be approved. If not, that’s an issue with management at that specific job. I admit I don’t know, but if you work somewhere and are consistently request requesting several days off every month I’m starting to wonder if a documented medical condition is on file and that’s why it’s being granted. Women, people in general, requesting multiple days off every m…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 12:55 PM
12

So they don’t actually get extra off days, their requested days off are being approved. OK, lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 12:52 PM
12

What is their field? Are they requesting days off? Are they using PTO? Is it in there handbook/contract that they are are givens days off for menstruation on a standard 30 day rolling period?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:30 AM
35

Doesn’t the shame stem from the fact that women with the same symptoms aren’t given the same grace to recover?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:25 AM
6

I’ve never disagreed that many qualities of a good parent overlap with those of a good partner. My point is that some people consciously or subconsciously start viewing their partner in a parental role. Fundamentally different things. Pretty easy to understand too… but I digress. If you’re only looking at a checklist of traits, then of course you’re not going to understand the distinction I’m making.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:15 PM
17

Possessing qualities that make someone a good parent is not the same thing as taking on a parental role within a relationship. I genuinely don’t know how to make that any clearer, my guy. Nowhere did I suggest it’s wrong to support, protect, provide for, or care for your partner the same way you’d want to do for your kids. That has absolutely nothing to do with the point I was making. You’re arguing against a position I never took because I don’t think you’re actually understanding the distincti…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:07 PM
18

I don’t really understand what’s so difficult about this distinction. Seeking certain parental qualities in a partner is not the same thing as wanting your partner to function as your parent. Those are fundamentally different things. I’m not saying that having qualities typically associated with a good parent automatically turns someone into their partner’s parent. That would be a huge leap in logic. So what exactly is confusing you about that distinction?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 12:55 PM
30

I think there’s a pretty big difference between a partner who possesses favorable parental skills. And then seeking a partner who will essentially become your “parent.”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 12:48 PM
44

When it comes to either “extreme” traditional presentation for men and women. They both basically boil down to you want a parent lol
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 12:21 PM
5

Why is the majority male gov’t rigging the system in favor of women anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:30 PM
11

In civil court, yes. He can’t be tried criminally due to statute of limitations.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:31 AM
12

So…the majority male gov’t is all conspiring together to “rig the system” in favor of women? Is there like a secret woman puppeteering the gov’t?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:29 AM
9

No. Having a male leader and a predominantly make gov’t is the direct opposite of matriarchal leaderships and matriarchal hierarchy. Do you know the definition of matriarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:20 AM
3

Men are facing shortcomings in many areas that I think needs to be addressed so you’re talking to the wrong person buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:30 PM
6

“Men’s problems should only be solved by men” is asking for the radicalization of men. That’s not what I said. Feminism didn’t win its fights just thanks to women, but to men too. Of course not. But feminism is still a sex-based movement focused primarily on women’s issues. Men have supported female-specific causes in the past and still do. So why are people specifically looking to a female-focused movement to prioritize male-specific issues? That’s like being confused that animal rights activis…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:24 PM
7

Feminism is a sex based movement. Why do men need help from the opposite sex based movement to focus on their issues? I think the “anyone else” interested should be men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:06 PM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 06:08 PM
4

When it comes to dating and friendships, yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 09:52 AM
4

Whatever works best for them. My man and I pay based on income. I pay most because he’s in school but before he paid everything when I was in school. We scale with each year as he makes more money.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 12:16 AM
6

EJ Johnson is a trip and a half oh my God lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 06:08 PM
8

Q1 - No, I’m only attracted to biological males. Q2 - Sure. With the hyper specific exception of a self proclaimed heterosexual male dating somebody who still presents very masculine. I would question if they were DL and if I was dating someone who wasn’t straight.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 05:35 PM
4

Why should people interact aimlessly? Why should I try to explain something that is not my point? Honestly, I’m having a hard time struggling with what it is you’re confused by. Even in your OG comment you spoke about things I never mentioned. What is confusing about myself saying that men and women sometimes interact outside of expressly attempting to build a relationship? Forgive me, but I feel like this is quite easy to understand. As a guy, every woman you speak to is only to pursue her to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 11:10 PM
5

I mean, yeah, of course society isn’t going to break down if you don’t do that on certain days. What does that have to do with anything I said? I’m arguing that men and women should interact. What is the point you’re attempting here?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 10:59 PM
3

Yeah, and historically segregation isn’t great in practice so ok?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 10:58 PM
10

I was kinda with what you were saying, but when you say that people aren't trying to make friends when they go out, but they are still interacting, what's the fun in that? Well, that’s not what I said. Why would you go out just to socialize with a "socialization object" that is an actual person if you don't either intend to have a genuine friendship with them, or a relationship? Because going out to socialize and then happening to interact with someone out in a public server are two different th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 10:53 PM
6

Yeah, you think that because you don’t apply your opinion to real world scenarios. Your opinion also encourages sexism btw
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 10:47 PM
10

Society in general would suffer if half of the population decided to just never, or rarely, speak to the other. This is being realistic on how society operates in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 10:40 PM
6

Yeah, no, I won’t be doing that. Besides the point, even if it is those four express things. Encouraging people to socially isolate historically doesn’t work. It also would be incredibly disruptive to society in general if we seriously started telling men to just not talk to women unless they have a “valid” reason. I mean, unless you think we should all live in a segregated utopia?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 10:26 PM
26

I am being very serious when I ask this, do you get out much? The fact that work seems to be the only environment you can think of where men and women interact outside of attempting to become friends or date is a bit concerning.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 10:18 PM
41

Probably because men do interact with women outside of expressly attempting to pursue them for a relationship or friendship. That’s just being an average participant in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 10:14 PM
2

I think my personal expectations and my boyfriend seemingly putting more “effort” into a previous relationship are two different things. I would be inquisitive, sure, but in the grand scheme of things I don’t really care because that relationship is irrelevant. For all I know, she was emotionally abusive and crazy so that’s why he felt like he had to go overboard 🤷🏾‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 10:03 PM
-1

Yes slut is a social label but the label implies that you have multiple sexual partners, the only reason why a virgin might be called a slut if she has multiple sexual partners but doesn’t have sex with them is because people perceive those who engage in that behaviour to be promiscuous. In the end, it relates to the perception of having multiple partners. I mean…ok? That still doesn’t mean someone who is slutty inherently has multiple sexual partners. And the reason I said tradcon women are les…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 12:40 AM
-1

Honest to god question, in what contexts do people call a woman who they believe to be a virgin a slut? If people do call a virgin or a low body count(3 or less) a slut it is because they perceive(because of her manner of dress/speech) her as someone with a higher body count especially if it happens outside of a LTR As I said, slut is more of a social label that doesn’t have a strict definition. Whether or not somebody is called a slut isn’t solely relied on sexual partners as you point it out, …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 12:23 AM
0

It’s important to understand nuanced definitions. Someone slutty does not inherently mean that they have, or had, multiple partners. As “slutty” is more of a social label and doesn’t really have a concrete definition. That’s why it’s possible for a slut to still be a virgin, for example. Conservative/traditional individuals can be extremely promiscuous and have multiple partners. You’re selling yourself a lie if you think otherwise. People who are conservative just tend to be better at hiding it…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 11:44 PM
7

Why do people act like something is gendered when it’s not? People who do this have low impulse control and lack the emotional intelligence to communicate like an adult. Abusive people don’t tend to be the most well mannered individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 09:17 PM
1

So, all women are shitty? Men only have the option of dating shitty women? Is there a reason why men are forced to do this? Why is this your only option? Why are men not able to date compatible women?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 10:12 AM

To be fair, nobody is really doing this. It’s just people wanting things to remain sex based because, you know, it’s always more or less been like that. The phenomenon of historically sex based spaces now transitioning to gender based, which is also based on how you feel, is a relatively new thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 09:03 PM
8

When he said that some women like to act like looks aren’t a part of attraction. Be so for real, it’s probably because you’re talking to a woman that is talking about a different type of attraction or just genuinely doesn’t care about how people look. Outside of that, anybody with two brain cells they are able to rub together knows being physically attracted to your partner is actually kind of a big deal 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 01:36 AM
20

99.9% of the posts on this sub are people pretending like they have conjured up a world altering philosophy when it’s really just common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 01:30 AM
0

Dishonest substitution, nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 03:12 AM
1

All I said was not everybody has the same opinion about anything. Even men don’t have the same opinion about how “traditional” women should act. So, what, men pick and choose what they want from traditional gender roles or is this thinly veiled women do it only, women bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:44 PM
1

Ok, good for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:40 PM
2

No…? It doesn’t matter what we’re talking about not everybody of a particular ideology has the same opinion about literally anything. Is it your first day on earth? Are you of the opinion that everybody of a particular opinion genuinely thinks the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:39 PM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:29 PM
-1

“You’re” as in me…? I approached my S/O first and believe women being pursued only is antiquated. Women are not a collective nor have collective views on what to “fight against.”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:29 PM
-1

Feminists are not a collective and all don’t collectively fight for the same thing or even have the same opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 09:51 AM
1

What is the goal with this comment? If it’s to ask if someone is a coward for participating in a social expectation that almost everyone else does. Then yes, it applies to those gender rules as well and they aren’t cowards. Outside of that, I don’t know what you’re trying to say here.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 05:11 AM
-1

That’s cool, I don’t really care because that’s a separate conversation. Stay on topic! Claiming women are cowards for not doing something that isn’t really socially normal or expected is stupid lol
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:00 AM
3

Sure, I agree that women can be a bit more resistant to certain changes in the name of “progression.” That’s neither here nor there. If even you can acknowledge why women tend to do something due to socialization and cultural expectation. Claiming it’s cowardice is a bit oxymoronic considering it assumes choice under relatively equal condition. Women in many areas of the US are actively taught to not pursue. (Why you’re acting like this US centric is beyond me. The concept of being pursued as a …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:53 AM
0

Right, so women are bad (or cowards in this case) for some reason without acknowledging cultural, social, and historic context. Average experience on this sub lol
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:43 AM
4

Are women cowards or are they just participating in a culturally and socially expected phenomenon?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:32 AM

What is your point exactly? That women tend to go back to school later than men? Ok….? If you’re trying to make a point outside of that, you’re not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 04:11 AM
10

Why because you have a gut feeling? That’s not proof of anything. I have a gut feeling you’re annoying but I can’t actually prove that to any reasonable degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 12:22 PM
18

As if women are the only people that go back to school later on in life. Why is this even gender based?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 12:07 PM
27

Ah, classic “women becoming educated is bad.”
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 12:02 PM
1

Being attractive to your partner is not an unreasonable metric. God forbid your partner actually wants to like looking at you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 11:20 AM
15

Am…. I missing something? Are we actually shocked and confused that most people need to actually do more than just be attractive to keep a partner and maintain a relationship that isn’t soul crushing 😭
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 02:03 AM
0

Yeah…ok? lol I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 10:42 PM
2

I don’t think I understand your comment. Comfortability is circumstantial. OP is clearly uncomfortable at something, that’s perfectly fine. Just as it would be equally fine if a woman is uncomfortable with something. You absolutely do not have to be comfortable with everything somebody says.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 10:20 PM
6

In the grand scheme of things, what is even the point of your comment? Like it’s more OK for men to talk about sex because they don’t talk about details? You also have a dumb ass take because it lacks relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 08:32 PM
4

I mean, that’s cool. There are still men out there who talk about sex in great detail, so. Uniquely feeling some type of way when women do it doesn’t even make any sense lol
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 08:30 PM
1

Which is shitty, I’m not going to disagree, but obvious is obvious. A few women doing something shitty does not mean women as a collective do the same thing. As I said, talking about sex is not this mysterious anomaly amongst friends. I’m not even sure why we’re acting like this is a gender based conversation. Men talk about sex. Men talk about sex with other sexually frustrated men. Does OP uniquely get frustrated just because the person talking is female? At the end of the day if something tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 08:29 PM
5

I always find it really funny when anybody makes such a bold face lie like this. Some men do actually go very in-depth about how they fuck and the people or person they fuck. Just because you personally don’t when you talk doesn’t mean it just never happens please be so for real lol
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 08:19 PM
1

Perfectly fine, that has nothing to do with my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 08:17 PM
0

So…do you feel the same when dudes talk about sex amongst themselves or just when women do it? Do you not have friends? Sometimes friends talk about sex. Welcome to the real world. Use your mouth and say you don’t want to hear it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 08:10 PM
0

It’s normal for friends to share details about their life with their friends. Have you communicated you don’t want to talk about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 05:43 PM
3

If saying that makes you feel better than yeah, he’s been doing that!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 02:23 AM
2

Idk man, my SO has had some extreme changes in appearance (when we first met he was extremely skinny I know this is probably some weird black pill logic where you want to pretend like women only like buff men but he was skinnier than me when we first met) and I’d dominate the shit out of him at any size. But ok ig lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 02:21 AM
4

Um, how? I’m describing my actual SO, not some random man I am fantasizing about dominating.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 02:18 AM
16

Emasculation and humiliation requires domination to a certain extent. Maybe not like a full on dom, such as complete submission, but there’s most certainly a power imbalance. But my comment was more in jest. I would be super open to exploring if my SO said he was interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 03:27 PM
18

I think women aren’t as forth coming with their interest to be dominating and/or aren’t as open to exploring it. Tbf, I don’t really like dominating either but for my man????? Yessssssssss.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 03:26 PM
34

I would be actually so elated. You’re telling me I get to dominate my big beefy meaty man?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 03:19 PM
1

And I’m responding to when OP says “shitty men ruin it for them.” No, they don’t if you don’t box all men together.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 05:12 PM
1

Saying that a group of individuals who do something ruin something for a larger group is the opposite of putting them all in the same box. Using the minority to judge the collective group is putting them in one box…..
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 05:11 PM
6

Thats why I call it a yellow flag. You know, yellow, caution. Ok, and I’m claiming this is a negative and you probably shouldn’t do that. Society also does the same when it comes to men who like being around kids. You want to pretend there’s not a reason people will be weary of that? You can be weary of whatever you want. Being of the opinion that men as a collective like kids is still a pretty negative assumption to have about people. I mean, if that’s how you wanna live your life have at it. B…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 03:09 PM
5

Which one are you claiming that I’m doing? Because it can’t be both. Um…it can be both. Your first sentence acknowledges that not all men do something. You then proceed to claim, however, that the group of individuals who do it ruin it for everybody so now you are making a judgment about the group as a collective. That’s not a contradiction, lol. People do this all the time for a variety of things. Like if I tell you chickens lay eggs, we both know that not all chickens lay eggs for a variety of…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 02:58 PM
6

Unfortunately, shitty men ruined it for them. Clearly, you are able to recognize not all men do what you are claiming. So, no, shitty men don’t actually ruin it for men as a collective. You just choose to collectively put all men in a box.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 02:52 PM
1

That’s not what I said, but ok!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 06:10 PM
3

Ironic, because people who talk about “decentering men” still center men since you, presumably, talk about men a lot in your pursuit to decenter them and pass on the message. You’re still a pick me at the end of the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 06:08 PM
4

Girl, you’re the pick me. “Ooooooh, I’m so much better because I don’t do this, that, and the third. I’m a better woman self respecting woman because I don’t center men.”
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 04:08 PM
2

Yeah, my point exactly. If you become self respecting later on you were never self respecting to begin with. Honestly, I don’t even see how the woman is a pick me lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 03:57 PM
13

Honestly, I think people in general need to grow a backbone and get off the internet. You’re not self respecting to begin with if a “pick me” is detrimental to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 03:52 PM

And the trend you’re noticing might be confirmation bias. It doesn’t mean it’s actually a trend that can be extrapolated to a wider population. Again, noticing something a lot doesn’t actually mean it’s a trend lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 07:33 PM

It’s just confirmation bias, confirmation bias doesn’t assert a general trend is happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 07:05 PM

Observing something many times doesn’t even assert it’s a trend to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 04:15 PM

Well, for one, noticing that something happens less than five times when OP almost certainly knows more women than that in their life isn’t a pattern to begin with lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 02:46 PM

Every single time I've tried to warn women, it has backfired. Never anymore. Right, because what like the two or three times this has happened to you means all women are same. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 12:02 PM

They really aren’t. You’ve admitted you’ve formulated this opinion from being on the Internet I think you just kind of rotted your brain dude. I’m not even trying to be funny, but this is an example of you need to go touch grass and put the phone down.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 10:01 AM
1

No, it’s not, it’s just somebody being super extreme about it lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 09:56 AM

As do women!?!?!?!?! Why are you acting like the female orgasm is like a unicorn. A lot of the female orgasm gap is a two-way street it’s women not knowing how to pleasure themselves and/or what they like to achieve orgasm. Her partner could also just suck ass in bed. Edit: “Seem to,” is prime example that you really need to get off the Internet. I’m not gonna hold you, yeah some people lie, not everybody does. Being so bothered that some people lie that you’re next assertion is that clearly you…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 09:52 AM

In my teenage/adult years, I thought it was common sense that safety, relaxation and, consent were big turn ons for women. It still is. Everytime I’ve been with a woman sexually, I made sure she was safe every step of the way, and a couple of women I’ve been with have said something along the lines of “knowing I’m safe turns me on” Are you alluding that just because somebody is turned on that automatically means they’re going to orgasm…?2+2 = 3, if this is the conclusion you’re coming to. When t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 09:48 AM
1

Leaning into “trends” that are culturally considered attractive to up your appeal isn’t counter cultural. Pretty much anyone actively looking to date does it to some degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 09:38 AM
5

Ignoring the whole one-sided relationship thing. There are general traits, features, characteristics, what have you that change throughout time. You need to claim that people that lean into these “hot” trends are perceived as maybe being more attractive? Huh? Posts that are just people regurgitating obvious stuff should be banned lol. Men do the same shit with women who do things that, for the time period, do things that are perceived as being extremely attractive. Again, go figure that when you…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:35 AM
14

That women have three holes down yonder. I meet a concerning number of adult men and women that think women pee out of the vagina 😭
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:09 AM
8

They might not speak for all women, but neither do you just because Bonnie blue is a whore and will let anybody fuck her lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 01:02 PM
9

I have. Men are not a collective.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:58 PM
9

Uh… just don’t marry a man like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:56 PM
0

Humans crave companionship and marriage is a common cultural next step. Reaping benefits is also extremely vague, what specific benefits?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:46 PM
10

Making sure the youth is fed does actually benefit you. At some point, you will rely on their labor and work when you either become too sick or old to contribute to society. Mind you, it’s not like we’re talking about mindless incentives that are just kind of random and happened to target younger people. We’re just talking about feeding people. I don’t know if you know this, but having a hungry population doesn’t help anybody lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:27 PM
17

Well, one is to feed children and one invites the very real hypothetical of sex trafficking. That’s your argument. Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:24 PM
12

I am largely talking about tax dollars and, regardless, your tax dollars aren’t gonna go to you. You don’t want them to go to kids, cool, they’re probably gonna go to some other group of individuals you’re not related to. That’s just how taxes work. Unless you never want to work, refused to pay your taxes and risk going to jail, or want to live in the wilderness. That’s just the reality you will always live in until you die.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:21 PM
12

Because that’s how taxes work Arguing that you don’t want your tax dollars to feed children because sometimes women consider men ugly is actually crazy 💀.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:14 PM
16

Are you arguing that government assistant programs shouldn’t exist because sometimes men are considered ugly? Wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:06 PM
7

Whenever the topic of hypergamy comes up why do people like to pretend like only women do?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 01:55 AM
1

Nope. And some still don’t deny that attraction matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 12:22 PM
6

Hahahaha, the fuck they do. It’s usually some of you say she’s lying about her preferences or, god forbid, she’s attracted to character and looks, or she’s lying about saying a shitty guy becomes less attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 12:18 PM
8

Uh, what? Who denies that women care about attractiveness?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 09:10 AM
1

If a man can’t afford to pay all the basics while single then he can’t afford the potential issues that can come up in a relationship and this needs to stay single and go out to work extra hours to support himself or he can do 50-50 with another man who will not make the same level of sacrifices as a woman. Yeah, a woman can do the same thing. Otherwise you’re hiding sexism behind gender essentialism. Also just because you dislike that I disagree with your stance doesn’t give you the right to na…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 07:39 PM
1

I think your prospective is weird. Why give a man sex, kids or submission for free? I don’t. I have a fiancé and we both contribute proportional to our financial income. Just because you cannot be 100% financially dependent on a man does not mean you were giving anything up for free. If you need your man to pay your way to proactively engage in a relationship with him, you’re a glorified prostitute and a bum. You’re hiding your rationale under the guise of gender essentialism when really you’re …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 03:00 PM
4

I think the roommate perspective is so weird. To be honest, I think expecting a man to be financially responsible for everything just makes you a bum lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 10:59 AM
8

Good for her, honestly.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 05:47 PM
1

This doesn’t hinge upon any gender being a monolith. You claim “most women” are attracted to men who make said changes. Which paints women as a monolith to some degree. If someone’s social ideology promotes men becoming less desirable to most women, then it’s a poorly conceived ideology. Multifaceted issue. What is actually being said? Who is saying it? Who is the audience? Are they saying “be less masculine” or “be masculine but these are traditionally ‘feminine’ traits that are attractive.” Pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 08:32 PM
2

And women like that too…women aren’t a monolith so I’m not sure what answer you’re seeking. Sorry, I never seen the word eschew before haha. English is a weird language.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 08:22 PM
1

We’re talking about desirable traits. What are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 08:19 PM
2

The issue is that, many of these women espouse beliefs that men should eschew traditional gender roles and masculinity, then turn around and deny those men sex and relationships. Uh…probably because you aren’t owed sex and a relationship just because women tend to be attracted to something. Super beyond concerning that I have to actually say that. If those women aren’t attracted to men who eschew traditional gender roles and masculinity, then they shouldn’t promote the idea that men should do th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 08:01 PM
5

Go figure that certain attributes tend to be more attractive. You are not saying anything new or revolutionary here, this talking point is regurgitated all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 03:03 PM
2

I don’t really get how that’s relevant but you got it pal lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 02:01 PM
2

It’s either something they saw on the Internet or something they experienced once so that means women as a collective must do it lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 01:39 PM
2

Men don’t respect women because of an Internet joke that isn’t rooted in anything serious? Right. I think sometimes some of you guys just salivate at finding reasons to not respect women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 01:38 PM
1

Putting people through little tests is something that is a collective experience. I’m not really sure why we’re pretending like women only do this. Like I said, this is a trend men also participate in so making it seem like it’s just women do it is even more stupid 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 01:37 PM
5

There are crazy women who are being serious about it but this is largely a meme question. It’s an Internet joke. All you have to do is say yes, it doesn’t actually require a lot of thinking lol. Men are also allowed to participate in the trend, there are several videos you can find of men doing it. If there are no women in your life where you can’t spit ball stupid ass questions back-and-forth to each other because it’s funny. You need to find better women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 01:27 PM
5

I don’t really get how if this phenomenon isn’t unique to either group.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 11:43 AM
4

a police officer would also tell a man that he should avoid shady ghettos... a father would tell his son to avoid various situations... I agree with you. This isn’t really what I’m talking about, however. I’m talking about the live experience many girls and women go through where male figures in their lives, and law-enforcement, tell them to be cautious of men specifically.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 11:40 AM
17

I mean, to be fair, the idea that men are dangerous and you should be more cautious around them is something men say to women all the time. This is a lived experience many women can regurgitate to having experienced at some point throughout their life. Fathers, uncles, male figures, and law-enforcement are people who do this pretty commonly and openly.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 11:23 AM
4

I’m physically attracted to them, sure. But the way they approach is often either creepy af or juvenile so I wouldn’t seriously entertain it if I were single.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 06:21 AM
3

Lololololol, exactly this. There are absolutely women who are super unrealistic with their expectations. But I find most often when you ask a dude to list what his partner wants it’s the most mundane shit and somehow she still ends up doing most of the house work 😭
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 08:41 PM
3

My apologies, I didn’t mean you specifically. I just noticed that whenever the topic of conversation comes on expectations of cleanliness a lot of people default to the presumption that the woman is neurotic and has unrealistic expectations. Without any assessment about the potentiality for the man just being a slob and having no real standard of being clean. On top of the fact, some of the things being mentioned aren’t even super big asks. For example, a woman isn’t being neurotic because she a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 05:38 PM
6

I see a lot of people say this but a lot of men are also way too comfortable being absolutely fucking filthy so it’s kind of like is she neurotic about cleanliness or are you used to just being gross?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 04:40 PM
7

Perhaps, a lot of the other stuff isn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 05:10 PM
17

The point being, in a two parent household it’s not unreasonable to expect both parents to participate. Unless you have a pre-arranged agreement, or that’s just kind of how it works out due to your work schedule, and one parent does most of the driving for medical care. Fine. Outside of that, why are you confused when the one parent doing most of the heavy lifting in one area starts to get an annoyed? Unless there is a genuine reason for why a parent cannot take their child to the doctor, like w…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 04:56 PM
36

Then I see all sorts of TikToks and posts on social media about women complaining about how they have to do everything. I mean, they are constantly driving around. Picking up kids. Dropping off kids. Meetings with kids. Doctor's appointments with kids. Teachers with kids. Meals for kids. This lady recently went viral because she wanted to divorce her husband because he did not take a clean sippy-cup out of the clean dishwasher. There’s a difference between unnecessary mental load and then you ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 04:45 PM
21

Something happening to one dude does not inherently suggest a significant portion of individuals with the same immutable characteristic are in a similar situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:40 AM

You can, otherwise it’s hypocrisy with circular reasoning to defend it. Men have agency.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:06 AM

Old man screaming at the clouds. You’re regurgitating what I just said champ but, ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:05 AM
3

If you can claim this for a man, then you can easily claim this for women. The point being made is that it’s not consistent to claim that women are more to blame for entering abusive relationships than men. It’s not a linear or consistent view at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 02:38 PM
2

Lol, the men commenting in response to me prove this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 02:12 PM
5

Thanks, I do try.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 01:54 PM
1

If you only have one option you should be able to determine if they have abusive traits. At the end of the day, I’m just doing what you’re doing where we blame the victim for being abused. But, of course, it’s not the man’s fault or it’s less of his fault. Or whatever. Either way, it’s not a consistent view using the logic you implored. This is not what I personally believe, blaming an abuse victim is crazy business.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 01:54 PM
3

No, actually, it doesn’t. What I am saying, however, is that you have less people to sift through. When you have less of something it is reasonable to assume you have an easier time highlighting when somebody is a bad partner. You have less people to actually sift through. Nowhere does that say this makes them suitable partners, it should just be easier for you to identify abusive behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 01:44 PM
5

People always have the weirdest justification for the shittiest things. Using your own logic, the inverse can also be said. If we are to believe that men have less dating options, this means they have less to actually sift through when it comes to finding a suitable partner. So, then, it’s more of a failing when they choose abusive women. We all know you’re going to make some argument for why what I’m saying is wrong, which is not logically consistent. But, yeah lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 01:33 PM
26

You ever notice how on this sub women are blamed for being in abusive relationships but when men are in the same situation it’s the woman’s fault? If you’re in a relationship with someone who weaponizes your vulnerability, leave them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 01:14 PM
4

😭😭
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 02:38 AM
6

The thing that’s really peculiar about conversations like this is that sometimes I don’t even know if it’s rage bait because there are people who unironically believe stuff like this. What does being a virgin have to do with your claim that having a higher body count means they women big dick?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 02:25 AM
3

Both are bums but, yeah, of course the guy is all fine and dandy 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 02:16 AM
5

How do you even get to that line of thinking? What if all the men slept with had abnormally small penises like there’s no way for you to know that lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 02:01 AM
2

And some men go on dates purely to fuck. Sometimes people date for a negative ulterior motives. Go figure sometimes people are shitty.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 01:36 AM
7

Chad McDonkeydick 😭😭😭😭
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 01:35 AM
10

Two sentences in. We’re supposed to assume that because a western woman has a “high body count” she prefers “big” dick. I need to go to bed bro, what the actual fuck. How do some of you guys even get these opinions in your head like what is going on at home? Women deny the stretch thing because that’s just not how vaginal physiology works.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 01:35 AM
18

Well If women have rights they still don't want equality( approaching a Man, paying for dates, househusband ) then there is no reason for rights The leap to this conclusion is crazy. You don’t approach men, so you don’t get rights 🤓☝🏾
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 03:27 PM
16

It’s always straight to taking away women’s rights lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 03:25 PM
7

That’s a reasonable expectation as well. Obvious is obvious, I don’t know what are you looking for people to say exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 03:07 PM
-1

Uh, her time and attention…? That’s the point of the date lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 03:02 PM
3

Most men don’t even make enough for something like that to be a reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 02:41 PM
11

I would just find someone not emotionally immature. It’s not like that’s a super outlandish dating expectation. I absolutely would rather be single.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 01:47 AM
5

Yeah, then they have the nerve to act shocked when they’re partner becomes bored of the relationship. Nobody cares that you have a stable job with a consistent schedule, you’re boring in all other areas of life and are not exciting to be around lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 12:23 AM
8

Ignoring everything I said is convenient. Especially considering the fact that I included an example with children. There are events you can go to that are kid friendly. You absolutely do not have to become a fucking hermit and do nothing except for work, come home, clean, and care for your children. Doing activities that involve children that is engaging and fun for the entire family has literally always been a thing lol. It’s also really good for their cognitive and social development so hones…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:42 PM
10

I guess my issue is the fact that I have to give you an example in general. Do you not exist outside of work? Do you not exist outside of your responsibilities? It can be anything as trivial as just being able to engage in a funny conversation, personality, actually having alone time every once in a while, making plans in the future to travel or do something small, etc., etc. Even if you have children there are events you can go to with your children that are fun and engaging. You don’t have to …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:36 PM
11

Truly, I don’t really know what anybody has to explain to you. Having a consistent schedule, which most employed adults have, does not mean you have to be so stuck in your rhythm that there’s just no other facet of you as a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:33 PM
12

Being stable and being boring are not mutually exclusive. How on earth do you even get to that conclusion?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:29 PM

These women and gender swapped men are two different things. Why do I have to explain that to you? I’m finding you don’t have a consistent view lol
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 10:25 AM

You didn’t answer my question.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 10:19 AM

He did that to prove the point that it’s not so much there's an ugly man epidemic, but men are just rated a lot more harshly than women who are objectively at the same level. How does it even prove this point? If you gender swap a bunch of men who end up looking mediocre as women does that prove that women are rated a lot more harshly?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 10:13 AM
5

r/im14andthisisdeep
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 01:57 PM
29

I’m fine approaching men. It’s how I met my fiancé.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 10:46 AM

Bro, the Boy Scout thing is absolutely mind-boggling. Boys are actively segregated from Girl Scouts but God forbid you point this out without being labeled a sexist/bigot/misogynist. It’s crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 02:54 PM
1

You are functionally saying this because later you say Actually, no I’m not. If you are finding yourself incompatible with somebody, you can stop pursuing a relationship at any time. The reason why saying this, “You can remedy this by being friends with somebody and not pursuing them romantically.” Comes off as a contradiction to you is because you have an ulterior motive in the friendships you choose to pursue. That motive being a romantic relationship so, then, why would you choose to pursue a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 05:26 PM
1

a) repeatedly engage with people who I am incompatible with on the off chance that I can stay invested long enough to form a connection with them that leads me to be attracted to them No, I’m not. If you are incompatible with somebody you don’t have to continue fostering a relationship with them. I never suggested otherwise. This is why it’s important to read and why I question your ability to think critically. Also, is this not the crux of being demisexual? Don’t you have to engage with somebod…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 01:47 PM
1

Ok, that still doesn’t mean a demisexual person should be surprised when their friend treats them like a friend and doesn’t return romantic feelings. Demisexual people also have the ability to communicate that they need strong emotional bonds before they can start to be romantically attracted to an individual. You could go into new relationships by making this known, you don’t have to sit there with your thumb up your ass and hope that somebody you’re already friends with returns romantic feelin…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 01:02 PM
1

They do not negate that a friend would treat someone like a friend and not a potential romantic partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 11:43 AM
1

Well, clearly they do if they are having any confusion about the fact that a friend would not view them in a romantic light.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 05:14 AM
2

It’s very easy for opposite sex individuals to be friends. I’m not sure why, or even how, the assumption that all opposite sex individuals are potential dating material arises in a person’s life. I think this is more of a personal struggle with not being able to form strong platonic bonds and not that collectively men and women just can’t be friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 07:42 PM
2

Sure, but this should not translate to you that a female is going to seriously consider all opposite sex friends as potential dating prospects. Extremely confusing that anybody seriously has to explain that to you lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 07:38 PM
21

These posts are so confusing. You have a friend and you’re confused that they don’t treat you like you are a potential romantic partner…huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 06:07 PM

It was completely fair for her to not be bound by the antiquated requirements that people subscribed to for years, but if I also wanted to be free of those requirements, it was met with a lecture about chivalry and “real men.” Sometimes I’m curious as to why it’s an issue to acknowledge this too and why it’s such an issue to speak about. It wasn’t even like I was dating super traditionalist women either. Some of the women I was seeing were the most progressive, liberal women you would ever know,…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 01:48 AM
6

I have a feeling this is going to the divulge into men create rules so that’s why it sucks ignoring the fact that we live in a society and both genders contribute to upholding standards. We don’t live in a vacuum, not everything is independently the fault of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 12:50 PM
7

I can sympathize because I approached my man first and people make fun of me for it! My SO is terribly shy I could never imagine him approaching anyone he’d probably cry, he’s so cute 😩
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 12:35 PM
27

I’m not male so obviously I can’t speak from a place of experience, it’s more so observation, but I think the introversion and mental well-being are the biggest obstacles. If you’re introverted, you’re basically cooked lol. I mean, dude, you can find entire thick pieces of people online talking about how if you’re not approached by a man first he’s not serious about you like God forbid you’re shy dude
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 12:26 PM
44

I truly do think there is a lot of pressure on men and it’s often downplayed or just ignored. Men are still held to very rigid gender roles and expectations and aren’t given a lot of space to break way from that. Example, thinking a man is cheap or not serious just because he doesn’t want to pay for everything on the first day. Or, I don’t know, I feel like there’s a lot of rhetoric about how men are needy when there’s a conversation about how you actually should treat them nice and like people.…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 12:20 PM
1

I feel like what you’re describing is pretty different than waiting to get to know somebody a little bit better before you sleep together.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 04:13 PM

Maybe it’s more of a historic argument, but white people being characters that are supposed to be something else isn’t an anomaly. It was incredibly common during the first years of film. As for the last 20 years, POC characters being changed to white people is actually a thing. I don’t really know why people pretend like it doesn’t happen or that it’s this one off anomaly. The last Airbender, Doctor Strange, ghost in the shell, Prince of Persia, Argo, 21, Pan, Aloha. Mind you, there’s nothing w…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 12:20 PM

That’s not what I said. I invite you to read slowly, carefully, and fully and actually take a moment to process information being presented to you. Weirdly, this proves OP’s point lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 12:02 PM

It’s not curious at all. We’re talking about various points of human history with various cultural, social, and ideological thoughts on certain things. No shit how people perceive individuals from various points in history changes depending on that present eras general viewpoint on certain topics.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 11:50 AM

So… physical attraction actually matters. Is there anything new, riveting, or exciting you want to add? Nobody cares that you’re a regular dude. Nobody cares that you’re nice. Physical attraction does actually matter for some people so, yeah, they might turn you down. If turning somebody down when they don’t find you attractive is shallow. Then so is being nice to try to obtain some sexual/romantic favor. Arguably that’s not you being nice. You have an ulterior motive and, possibly, become a shi…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 11:35 AM
0

Western society is not strictly monogamous. Cheating, multiple sexual partners, and having casual relationships is far too normal to suggest otherwise. Men and women are also not only “allowed” one partner. You can talk about marriage, which cool, but you can still have more than one partner. It’s not illegal to fuck or date multiple people. Moot argument when no western society operates like this. Even then, reproductive value would not be the same in a hypothetical society because this presume…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 02:29 PM

Pray tell, what was the point of your comment? Women aren’t monolithic, you come out of nowhere and say there’s something wrong with this argument. Is it not unreasonable to assume you’re arguing that women are monolithic? Otherwise, what imaginary argument are you arguing against? Unless you’re responding to the generalizing part?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 11:44 AM

Well, it does. Women are not monolithic. Recognizing a general trend doesn’t mean everybody of a collective group does something. Some women do prefer “golden retriever” sweet/nice type men. There is the Superman type of man, he’s not really a “dark” character. “Dark,” is also not universal for personality for some people it’s skin tone. There are billions of women on this planet, of course they’re going to like different things even if certain things tend to be more popular. Just to see if you …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 11:35 AM

Recognizing that certain traits are popular doesn’t actually discount anything that is being said. Women are not monolithic and still have personal preferences outside of what is generally popular.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 11:27 AM
1

Just as with literally any other absolute that is posted on this sub. Some do, some don’t. I would wager more women care if you have a care and take care of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 03:37 PM

Women claimed to be more emotionally intelligence without evidence. You are claiming women claimed to be more emotionally intelligent without evidence. Rock solid argument my man
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 01:52 PM
1

Then didn't that invalidate the core principles That Women's values are not tied to their sexual history. Not necessarily. There’s a difference between personal and societal expectation. Many people understand that a woman’s value to broader society really should not be tied to their sexual history. But in a personal intimate setting, they prefer somebody who is more sexually reserved, doesn’t have a lot of sexual experience, whatever it is they prefer. Two things can be true at once. Men who su…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 03:44 AM
2

Your post, which was definitely written by AI dear God the em dashes lol, makes it seem like this is a problem. I’m struggling to understand what the problem is. You can support something and not want to live that reality, people do it fairly often.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 03:34 AM
2

Doubling down that you don’t know the definition of equal distribution is crazy work.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 01:26 PM
6

this is not how math works, IF you have variety YOU HAVE equal distribution. No it doesn’t and I suspect you don’t know the definition of equal. If I have a variety of apples this should not suggest to you that I have an equal distribution of Apple types. I might have a bunch of apple crisps, this means the distribution is not equal despite the fact that I have a variety. I’m cracking up that I even have to seriously take the time to explain this to somebody. You’re more than welcome to actually…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 01:19 PM
3

What modern women consider normal to womanhood is Infact what ALL men view as male gender identity. So dealing with a menstrual cycle, talking about boobs, talking about getting my nails done, hair removal, etc. are considered manly now? Jee golly wilkers, this is news to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 01:10 PM
7

Basic math, you could try it some times. People have a variety of things they like, this does not inherently suggest the things are going to be equally distributed amongst women. This is a nonsensical thing to assume. You’re more than welcome to actually explain the math to me. I have a feeling it’s not going to follow any logical sense, which is why you failed to do it to begin with. Hint: Presuming that probability is equally distributed because “trust me bro” is not an argument. If you go to …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 12:55 PM
16

If that was true then male model tier guys wouldn't get tens of thousands of women despite openly admitting to being convicted serial "pea doughs" and "grapists", while normal, average guys get nothing I have to explain to you that just because a large number of people may like something that doesn’t mean the group as a collective tends to like it? So, using this logic, since there are large numbers of men who are attracted to little girls this has to mean that men tend to like children, right? …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 12:43 PM
22

If every woman really were unique in her taste then matches, be it online or in real life interactions, would be more evenly distributed. How do you even get to this conclusion? The phrase just acknowledges that women don’t all collectively have the same taste. This doesn’t mean there’s going to be an equal distribution of what women tend to like that doesn’t even make any sense. Individual preferences do not suggest all men are equally going to have the same level of attraction and attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 12:37 PM
0

Where did I say that?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 03:39 AM
3

Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 12:01 AM
1

Oh, didn’t know you were an omnipotent relationship genie and clearly know what’s happening. My bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 09:56 PM
1

There are a multitude of reasons for decreased intimacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 09:47 PM
0

Once again, sex should never be expected. The husband is setting himself up for failure if he genuinely believes doing a couple household chores is going to end up with his wife on her back with her legs spread open. While he is not a manipulator. From the perspective of the wife, even if he was genuinely trying to relieve stress, he still was doing it with the ultimate goal of sex. This can be upsetting to people.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 09:34 PM
0

Once again, if you ever expect sex from your partner you are setting yourself up to fail. The wife expressed being overworked has decreased her sex drive and/or intimacy. This does not mean that her workload being lightened would increase intimacy within her relationship. It is perfectly logical to expect the problem to get better, absolutely, but that does not mean it will. If you are attempting to do something with the outcome of sex maybe be a little bit more realistic and factor in the poten…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 09:13 PM
-1

I think the problem in your scenario is that the husband shouldn’t expect intimacy. You really should never expect your partner to have sex with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 09:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter