TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mybravenewworld Archive

View 2 posts and 76 comments by mybravenewworld on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Question for Blue Pillmybravenewworld/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 10:11 PM
2

mybravenewworld/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 03:50 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

'Mother Nature' is the bitch of 'the Laws of Physics'
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 07:14 AM
-5

In the long term, I think 'a brave new world' type socialism will be the solution. A world where 'everybody belongs to everybody.' It would require a type of empathy that most humans are currently not capable of at the moment, so this won't happen without genetic engineering. Just like the invention of condoms/birth control changed society unimaginably, the next big technology like genetic engineering/designer babies or artificial intelligence will do the same. The solution will likely be found …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 05:20 AM
0

It's probably more than just getting sex. If you looked at that link about Norway, it looks like 10% of men, mostly working class, who can't start families or become fathers, despite wanting to. It's not the women's fault, if you have enough money and security to take care of a kid on your own, it only makes sense to find a man with good genes to produce the kid even if that man becomes a repeat father.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 04:23 AM
1

Imagine a world where only men can own homes. Let's say there's 100 million people - 50m women, 50m men. There's only 50 million homes and they're given to all the men. Do you think a large amount of women will be homeless in this world? Then imagine it the other way around - the same world but only women can own homes. 100 million people - 50 m men, 50m women. The 50 million homes are given to the women. Do you think a large amount of men will be homeless? (Imagine it's a warm climate so homele…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/17 06:00 AM
1

Perhaps hypergamy originates in women having a lower sex drive (on average) than men, because that would explain why they are willing to forgo being in a relationship all the time. How did you come to realize that sex drive differences enable hypergamy? Did you read about that in these forums or on trp?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/17 03:19 PM
1

Everything here is on the money.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/17 08:12 AM
1

Best explanation I've seen. Very user-friendly. Should be in the redpill sidebar.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/17 08:07 AM
1

Usually the hottest women in the population become celebrities or models. it's proof that men don't prefer a virginal submissive girl-next-door as red pill claims. I don't know about the girl next door part. But yes, men prefer virginal and submissive, but physical beauty is the priority.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/17 07:47 AM
9

They do that anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/17 07:38 AM
2

So if men are polygamous, and women are hypergamous, does monogamy tend to favor women? Hard to say if monogamy favors women or not (because of conflicting dualistic desires). Easier to understand how it affects men. If one man is being polygamous, that means some other man out there is alone. This is because the gender ratio is about 1:1. So polygamy divides men into winners and losers. Polygamy benefits successful men at the expense of unsuccessful men. isn't Hypergamy really just a form of se…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/17 07:37 AM
2

Why would women hate men if prostitution was legal/
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/17 07:21 AM
6

legalize prostitution.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/17 07:17 AM
1

Everything here makes sense from a redpill point of view. Women don't mate down. If a woman out-statuses a man, that man has less sexual chance with that woman. So it makes sense that low status men try to use other means (aggression/hostility) to stay above as many women as possible. This is why blue collar men have shifted from the left to the right, politically. As more and more women out-status and out earn low value men, the pool of women that will mate with them decreases.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/17 07:10 AM
0

No matter how lonely or horny I was, I wouldn't want men to be sexually subjugated or economically oppressed so a man would reluctantly fuck me. The man would be out there having sex with a hotter chick. It would be 'sexual subjugation' for him to be having sex with you instead?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 03:47 PM
1

It's the same way that incel men get manipulated politically. I'm curious what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 01:05 PM
1

What's being referred to? What fate was avoided?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 12:03 PM
1

It's a liberal concept to allow polygamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 02:32 PM
2

The sex drive apparently doesn't decrease I guess I was making an assumption. Hope you're right!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 02:01 PM
11

I probably generally agree with a lot of what you're trying to get across, but this part was wierd for me- Or, consider the options of an 81 year-old man who wants to have sex. The only women who would make themselves available to him would be those approximately his own age. Is there no empathy that he would like to have intimacy with a younger person? First of all, at age 80 the sex drive should be a lot lower. Secondly and more importantly, if he can get sex from a woman equal to him in smv, …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 12:18 PM
2

Life is a game. Then you die.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 10:11 PM
1

To me, the male dominance hierarchy described by TRP is real, but exists as a function of specific social environments, rather than being an essential feature of the species. It's how women carry out sexual selection in our species. So long as women continue to do that, male dominance hierarchies are inevitable.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 09:36 PM
1

I'd agree that culturally men have higher sex drives. But there's been so much influence from socialisation that it's difficult to come to a conclusion. From WebMD - 'Study after study shows that men's sex drives are not only stronger than women's..' The science seems conclusive. I doubt WebMD is a biased website that only looks at selective studies. (How much of it is culture is irrelevant and a different discussion, what's important for the logic is the existence of the disparity in sex drives…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 08:59 PM
1

Hypergamy is tough to understand properly, and the fault lies in the choosing of the word. Forget about hypergamy for a bit. You seem sincere in trying to understand RP and figuring out if there's anything solid behind it, so I'll give it a shot in explaining it with a new way I came up with. Men have higher sex drives than women. Common sense/experience verifies this, but if you need a source/studies - http://www.webmd.com/sex/features/sex-drive-how-do-men-women-compare#1 This means the collect…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 11:31 AM
1

But you don't see how selfish that is? Only if you think sex is an irrelevant (or very minor) part of life. Don't you think it's selfish of the other 3 people to exclude him from sex in such an obvious way. (Obvious because there's only 4 people on the island.) So the only way to make sex universal would be to completely get rid of slut-shaming and to even praise women for having sex with lots of men as a good and respectable deed. That's not enough because what happened on the island can happen…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 01:59 AM
1

but then whoever was feeding him will stop feeding him, and he will die. It's not in his best interest, that's all. If he dies, the rest die too. The end result would most likely be them incorporating him in sex. Unless they think having sex with him is worse than the death of the group. I'm not "focusing on this aspect" Ok. The larger point was conservative morality is better than liberal morality because the latter can allow outcomes such as the one I described in the island scenario. You more…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 01:05 AM
1

Not sure why you're focusing on this aspect of it, instead of the larger point, but lets. Stopping to do his labor is not an option to bargain for sex, it's a breach of the established social contract. You can't renegotiate contracts? People can't change their prices for their products? What kind of contract are you imagining took place at the start of this scenario - 'we all agree to trade these services for only these other services for the rest of the time we're on this island, and we can't r…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 10:45 PM
1

For starters, he's blaming the women for not having sex with him, I don't think he did that, he started bargaining with them because they were the ones who can provide sex to him (given he's heterosexual). I think if Brad was only having sex with one of the women, the second one might pair off with Mike. Brad is hogging all the sex resources. Yeap. One of the points of the exercise was to show that following liberal morality only (as long as sex is consensual its fine) can lead to the situation …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 06:50 PM
3

Polygamy is extremely dangerous to societies if it becomes a widespread way of life If the redpill does nothing else, it needs to enter this understanding into mainstream politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 10:49 PM
1

Interesting. Would you be in favor of defunding the Department of Education? It's pretty dark to exchange a person's life for sex. I'd be more happy siding with Mike if he built shelters. But at the end of the day, you're OK with it? Mike is a doctor, the labor he provides is healthcare, if you limit how he can bargain with his skill but don't limit how shelterbuilders can bargain with theirs, that'll lower the incentive for people to become doctors and increase the incentive to become shelterbu…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 10:15 PM
1

They are excluded from society and are merely being used as slaves in the meaning that they are the ones that usually get almost nothing back for the tax money they pay and their contribution to society. It's not that bad right now... There are a lot of restrictions on hypergamy at the moment, mostly the economy. What I'm worried about is the future, in a post-scarcity world. I wish I could live forever to find out how humanity deals with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 09:02 PM
2

Markets have nothing to do with it. Markets have everything to do with it. The number of times women want to have sex is lower than the number of times men want to have sex. Female participation is the limiting factor. For men its a marketplace of winners and losers. Culturally enforced monogamy (conservatism) is redistribution of sex. There's nothing wrong or inconsistent about thinking certain rights should be more limited than others; Not in the mood to put on my libertarian cap at the moment…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 09:14 AM
0

Opportunity, sure. But as you said, there's the chance Girl 2 won't be interested in Mike even if Girl 1 and Guy 1 pair off monogamously. Right, I'm not suggesting its a perfect solution. I just think it's better than a sexual free market. Look, I've seen this argument before. But the belief that "back in the day" pretty much everyone was guaranteed a partner just isn't true.And lots of marriages were unhappy. Trying to gauge how happy society is as a whole is tough to do. It's gonna be a matter…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 08:41 AM
2

The sexual outcome of the island is inconceivable? Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 08:17 AM
0

So you think everyone should be monogamous because it increases your chance of finding a partner. Yes, that is my point. Monogamy allows every person a decent opportunity to find a mate, since there's about equal numbers of men and women. Isn't that what liberalism should be about, equalizing opportunity, instead of creating a world of winners(like brad) and losers (like mike)?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 08:14 AM
1

(copy pasting for you..., but after this, I'm probably not responding anymore, if you don't get it what I'm trying to say after this post, then I don't think there's much else to say.) In the story, Mike went to the three of them and told them how this situation was unfair. The three of them responded by saying, sorry, nothing we can do. (Realistically I don't think this would've happened, if everyone was normal. I don't think the women would've been as unempathetic as you've been in your respon…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 07:57 AM
2

Were you a libertarian before you encountered the red pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 07:45 AM
0

read the later exchanges. about conservative morality You think women should let any man kiss or fuck her simply because he asked. Is that correct? No. I don't believe the world is ready for that. Human beings cannot help but sexually discriminate. And because of this, conservative morality is better for society at the moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 07:42 AM
1

That's not what liberals promote come on. Obviously not. I'm saying it should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 07:33 AM
1

What's the alternative, force the woman to have sex with someone she doesn't want to? read my exchange with cuittler
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 07:29 AM
1

You don't seem to understand the position of the left very well. I see, why don't you help me understand then. So the left is OK with Mike's situation on the island? In an environment with equal amounts of men and women, 2 men and 2 women, there's nothing wrong with Brad having sex with both women and Mike not being able to have sex? Unfortunate but acceptable outcome?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 07:20 AM
2

I think the difference we're getting at here is property rights vs. bodily rights. Right, so if you allow liberals to make that distinction to the extent that they think polar opposite systems should be applied to each - free market of bodily interaction, and authoritarian control/redistribution of property, then you end up with the scenario I presented, where people like Mike can't trade his labor for sex. What's more is, even in a libertarian world (where property and bodily rights are the sam…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 07:05 AM
1

First point -In a world where everyone's labor is shared equally, but sex is not, the option to trade labor for sex will be gone, leaving some men in Mike's situation. The second point - the idea that 'no one is entitled to sex' is currently a position of the left, it leads to inequality of sexual opportunity (like in the story).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 06:36 AM
2

If there was an agreement/contract concerning the trading of services at the start, then yea, you're right. But you're missing the larger point.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 05:50 AM
4

There is an unspoken agreement of sharing each other's labor for the good of the group. Unspoken, meaning it was more of an assumption everyone made at the same time. It's interesting that's what you're focusing on.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 04:15 AM
4

Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 02:15 AM
3

In the story, Mike went to the three of them and told them how this situation was unfair. The three of them responded by saying, sorry, nothing we can do. (Realistically I don't think this would've happened, if everyone was normal. I don't think the women would've been as unempathetic as you've been in your responses. I think they would've had sex with him out of pity/shame/benevolence. Remember there's only 4 people on this island, excluding someone would be painfully obvious and would evoke sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 02:05 AM
5

My answer, intellectually, is yes. In a liberal world that wants to be consistent, heterosexuality would be discrimination. Is the world ready for that? Obviously not. That's the point. It is immoral, by the left's own sentiments, to impose a sexual free market in a world where individuals can't help but sexually discriminate. Just like they understand that you can't impose a free market of food distribution in a world where tribalism exists, because some groups might let other groups starve. So…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 01:01 AM
4

even if your four person religious world were real it would still cause the woman harm if she doesn't want to fuck you and you forced her to. Why do you keep reframing everything as 'force'? I didn't say Mike would force the other woman to marry him. I just said Mike would convince Brad not to have sex with a second woman by evoking a morality based sexual commitment. That's all. In fact this entire exercise is based on the restriction of not using force. The point is if people acted based on li…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 12:53 AM
6

Of you still don't get it, imagine someone starts punching you repeatedly in the balls and says "it gets me off, why can't you just deal with it?" I asked if you can articulate why. Instead you're leaving me to infer. Are you suggesting the act of sex between men and women is inherently asymmetric, so much so that it needs to be taken into account? Can I ask you something else? In the scenario in the OP, where consent is the only rule of morality governing sex, Mike was left without a partner in…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 12:26 AM
3

I see. My answer, intellectually, is yes. In a liberal world that wants to be consistent, heterosexuality would be discrimination. Is the world ready for that? Obviously not. That's the point. It is immoral, by the left's own sentiments, to impose a sexual free market in a world where individuals can't help but sexually discriminate. Just like they understand that you can't impose a free market of food distribution in a world where tribalism exists, because some groups might let other groups sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 12:08 AM
3

only fix it if your agreed to let him fuck you and use your body? Is that what sex is? One person uses the other body?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 11:49 PM
3

You're right. The larger point is that there is no moral solution to Mike's sexual problem if the morality of the left is used. As evidenced by the comments, the left is forced to say that the other three are doing nothing wrong by excluding him from sex, but Mike is doing something immoral when he tries to remedy his situation through non-violent means. What if Mike had a 'conservative morality' to work with? A morality that says you shouldn't have sex with more than one person at a time. That'…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 11:45 PM
3

'but forcing someone to have sex with you causes them great harm.' Can you articulate why this is exactly? It's not a principled thing, you're fine with forcing doctors to treat everyone equally, etc etc. So what is it exactly that causes this 'great harm?' If a man asked you for a kiss, would it cause you 'great harm' to oblige? What's different with sex, especially in a world of contraceptives and birth control? If we are all indeed more the same, then we are different, as liberals like to say…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 11:27 PM
3

You're a libertarian?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 10:37 PM
6

If you were one of the paired off, would you take one for the team. The liberal answer should be yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 10:36 PM
1

Chances are the post the OP linked is fake, but there's 3.5 billion men in the world, it's possible a guy like this is real. If you were face to face with him, and he told you what he said and asked you for help, is this what you would tell him? Clearly he's not very savvy or intelligent, would you tell him that his problem is he's treating women like glass figurines and that he needs to treat them like adults? Is this the advice that this man's brain is missing that if given will trigger the be…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 12:36 AM
5

If I knew someone who was that sad and lonely I'd try my best to help him get help. Help him get help? Why not help him yourself LOL?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 11:58 PM
1

Yea, he'll fuck her, but why would he have to take care of her? Like I said, more women than men in this scenario, he'll marry/live with a woman without kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 08:48 PM
1

The paper says woman are choosy and want long term relationships. They use simple logic to come to this conclusion. Redpill agrees, but then asks the next question - how can a woman be choosy and still get a long term relationship? How would a woman reconcile these conflicting desires?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 06:45 PM
1

Once again, there's more women than men in this situation. Why would a surviving man have to take to care of a single mother and her kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 06:34 PM
1

RedPilled people with different value systems will fight eachother to th death. There's about equal amounts of men and women. When men kill each other, there's more women for the surviving men. Death is cuckoldry.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 01:39 AM
1

As a scientist, that isn't my field, don't hold me to a higher standard because I'm probably as well educated on this as you. Ah, ok. Thanks anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 12:21 AM
1

I think the article was saying that 17-1 was the peak variance, not overall. There's more modern research involving full sequences of X chromosomes and autosomes Can I get a link to the recent ones? Uniparental lineages are bad tools for determining the kind of variance that TRP cares about. Can you explain this a bit more? Also, do you think Bateman's Principle applies to humans?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 12:21 AM
1

I could not find a graph of it in that link..This is insane.. The second article uses a lot of jargon that I don't understand, but I'm getting a vibe that what it's mostly saying is - 'Don't look at the absolute temperatures, look at this thing we call 'temperature anomaly, and trust us that it looks bad.' I want to see the absolute temperatures myself and make that judgement on my own. I can understand that knowing what the temperature of the earth was in 1850 would be difficult ( maybe impossi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 09:21 PM
1

Well, for starters that isn't what TRP does. It's a collection of anecdotes, and one with a heavy selection bias. Nothing close to a science. Right. I understand. But in general, there are some major issues with evolutionary psychology as a science, which we have talked a fair bit about as of late. There's no need for evolutionary psychology. By looking at genes, we can tell the variance in reproductive success in males vs females in our history. https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 08:48 PM
1

The Y axis of the graph they showed was 'temperature anomaly' on a scale 1 degree celsius. This is what I mean. Why are there no simple graphs of just temperature vs time, even just for recent human history?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 08:27 PM
1

When a biologist studies reproductive behavior in gorillas and writes a paper describing his results/conclusions like in this - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10329-014-0426-2 - we call this science. Can this be done for humans?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 08:12 PM
1

Your thread was removed..Strange, I wonder why. Was there a graph of temperature vs time in that video? Could you link it to me again?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 07:12 PM
1

Since measurements began? Prior to that it would be guess-work no?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 07:00 PM
1

If you have the time to answer - What is your politics? How are they informed by your understanding of HBD? (Are you a white nationalist? Immigration restrictionist? )
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 06:42 PM
–

You didn't really answer my question. I'll try again. You are red pill. You say Muslims are 'the most red pill group on the planet.' So why wouldn't you like them then?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 06:04 PM
1

So they will only want to sleep with top notch guys as soon as they're getting oh, 35,000k or whatever the absolute top-out welfare number is for a woman with children? What amount do think it would have to be then?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 05:53 PM
–

By your tone, you seem to be against Islam, but if they are 'the most red pill group on the planet,' you should be OK with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 05:36 PM
1

If anyone has any questions regarding climate science then I can get you an answer Could you help me find a simple graph with the 'earth's average temperature' on the y axis and the 'year' on the x axis? Maybe I'm bad at googling, but I only find graphs that show 'change in temperature' or other variables. I'm looking for a simple 'temperature vs earth's age' graph.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 05:26 PM
3

I said 'for whatever reason.'
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 05:10 PM
3

I really do not see how you can not empathise with what a terrible thing it is to be forced to put up with a man you find repulsive for survival reasons. You would agree that it's just as terrible if, for whatever reason, a man had to put up with a woman he found repulsive?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 04:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter