~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -7 | Waris Dirie: 'Female genital mutilation is pure violence against girls'. But this FGM sufferer then mutilates the penis of her little boy. Excerpt from her book in comments.Lets just wait for that guy to grow up and see whether he hates his mama for being an abuser. And yes, activism in the wrong place makes one impossible to deal with. Only a person who has had a close experience with neither can equate fgm and circumcision..ofcourse I have not had fgm, a woman has...the trauma is uncomparable. If the mother felt circumcising the child can help him, she doesnt deserve to be hated blindly. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/13 02:05 PM |
| -6 | Waris Dirie: 'Female genital mutilation is pure violence against girls'. But this FGM sufferer then mutilates the penis of her little boy. Excerpt from her book in comments.I would be such a loser if I judged reality from the downvotes or upvotes it gets, wouldn't I? I dont get it. How do you guys not approve voluntary curcimsicion if the person who underwent himself is happy? I said she should have taken the boys opinion, which means waited for him to grow up. Or is it just reaction to some hidden anger coming out in the wrong place? | /r/MensRights | 15/10/13 01:50 PM |
| -9 | Waris Dirie: 'Female genital mutilation is pure violence against girls'. But this FGM sufferer then mutilates the penis of her little boy. Excerpt from her book in comments.Wow.......I had no idea I could be interpreted in only this way. Anyways, no right mind will equate circumcision to fgm...if quote for quote argument is what you want, forgive me, I can not give it. I have seen countless men benefit from voluntary circumcision, which is not the case with fgm. Shower me with downvotes as presently is the case. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/13 01:39 PM |
| -6 | Waris Dirie: 'Female genital mutilation is pure violence against girls'. But this FGM sufferer then mutilates the penis of her little boy. Excerpt from her book in comments.Ofcourse..without his consent it is wrong without doubt...but I dont think it should be labeled at par with fgm... chances of a traumatic life for a guy can't be compared with an fgm girl...also, botched up operations are a rarety today, and thr failure rate is consistent with all similarly complicated surgeries...nothing especially bad | /r/MensRights | 15/10/13 10:55 AM |
| -9 | Waris Dirie: 'Female genital mutilation is pure violence against girls'. But this FGM sufferer then mutilates the penis of her little boy. Excerpt from her book in comments.Sources are out there, but not entirely conclusive, just medical reports, no use citing them here, they will be bashed....you can search if you wish. I'm talking more importantly, about the intent. Women were treated as second grade cows not worth their own pleasure. This made women, with their natural sex-drive, more prone to explore their sexuality, since at home, they had no respect. To lessen this sexual drive, and reduce pleasure for women, their clitoris was cut off, often inhumanely, and … | /r/MensRights | 15/10/13 10:09 AM |
| -12 | Waris Dirie: 'Female genital mutilation is pure violence against girls'. But this FGM sufferer then mutilates the penis of her little boy. Excerpt from her book in comments.am I the only one here who thinks male circumcision is actually beneficial? I mean, cmon. In females, it is done to stop them from having pleasure, in men it has known to reduce chances of aids and other STD and even prolong pleasure time, since sensitivity decreases by some amount....or did they do it inhumanely to that little boy? Without medication or anasthetics? In that case she is bullshit...if she did it medically, I think she meant good! Although 'not asking' the boy before doing it is a… | /r/MensRights | 15/10/13 09:01 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter