TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

n0t1337 Archive

View 0 posts and 116 comments by n0t1337 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I don't think aspergers is any more of an insult than midget is. Neither one is intrinsically bad, in this context I agree to some extent. This post lacks nuance. I suspect as you get older and become more accustomed to the hypocrisy of tumblr feminists your attitude will mellow somewhat. You'll develop more cogent arguments that flow together more easily. All in all, I wouldn't worry about it too much.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 08:00 AM
1

I feel like that's pretty much the perfect height. If I could be 2 inches shorter, I think I'd do it. Once you get out of the 6'2"-6'4" you stop being tall and start being freakishly tall. Which I think is still better than being short, but still not ideal.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 08:33 PM
1

I mean, it's not just as much of a disadvantage, but if I be 2 or 3 inches shorter, I'd happily do it.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 08:18 PM
1

Well, it's not totally separate from health. Being super tall can impact your circulation, your risk of pneumothorax, etc. But it is less influential than weight.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 07:24 PM
-6

Can we all agree on a couple of things? 1) Men are, on average, more physically aggressive than women. 2) Alcohol impairs decision making and lowers inhibitions. Certainly alcohol doesn't make all men aggressive, and it's wrong to assert that it does, but the phrase "Alcohol makes you aggressive" is more likely to be true for a man than it is for a woman.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 09:54 PM
10

http://s24.postimg.org/9w202v1et/Power_Fantasy.png
/r/MensRights05/12/13 12:30 AM
1

It's very odd to me to hear someone on this sub denouncing the idea of implied consent. Usually, most here are incredibly opposed to the idea that all consent must be explicit and enthusiastic. It's possible to possible to consent to something without being extraordinarily happy about it, and it's silly to say that for every single sex act, explicit permission must be gotten beforehand. ("Can I kiss you on the lips? How about now on the neck?" etc.) Implied consent is the obvious answer. In the …
/r/MensRights02/12/13 01:53 PM
1

I mean, you might be right, but I'm very wary of this becoming a movement where we get overly concerned about tone and feelings.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 11:44 PM
1

from what I can tell /r/sex generally tends to believe that gender is distinct from biological sex, and that gender norms are primarily influenced by society. To me, those are the sort of iconic beliefs that feminism embraces much more thoroughly than mens rights does.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 11:43 PM
0

1) /r/sex is pretty feminist 2) Legally it was almost certainly rape, but it might have been a morally okay action within the context of their relationship. If the dude expresses that it's okay, then it's fine. If it were me in his place, I think I'd have a hard time staying with someone who felt so entitled to using my body without asking me first, but that might just be me.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 08:31 PM
3

I just don't like people touching me all that much. Especially if I don't know them all that well. I don't think it's a threat response thing, I'm a 6'6" dude, and feel uncomfortable even when it's a really tiny, innocuous looking girl touching me. With that said, I realize how uncomfortable it is to sit with your legs together. While on public transportation, I usually just weigh how uncomfortable I am touching knees against how uncomfortable it would be to get my testicles compressed by my thi…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 04:10 AM
5

I think that this view is actually the view held by the majority on this subreddit. I could be wrong of course.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:18 PM
11

So, to help raise awareness about the shitty nature of unsolicited, unwanted dick pics, they solicit dudes for dick pics and compile and album? Honestly, I think it's adorable that they function in society as well as they do. I bet they'll even learn to tie their own shoes someday.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:05 AM
-1

Women are hypergamous, men are ephebophiles; these two truths are both unpleasant, but truths nonetheless.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:02 PM
1

This just in; water is still wet.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:26 PM
4

I mean, you're not wrong, but he's just an 8th grader so...
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:11 PM
5

if someone is performing a sexual act on you and you do not want it done, it's rape. Simple. Except that's fucking wrong. If someone's performing a sexual act on you that you don't want done and they know you don't want it done, sure, I'll agree that's rape. But if you change your mind during sex and fail to notify me, how in the actual fuck is it fair to hold me accountable for that? Implied consent is perfectly valid in other parts of law, for example, if you're driving, or if paramedics need …
/r/MensRights04/05/13 04:38 PM
3

she is already showing her consent. Some feminists would agree with you, others say that enthusiastic consent must be verbal. That's one reason why I'm opposed to the idea; there's no consensus on what the term actually means. They're constantly saying "do you like that?" In various non-mood killing ways that could also be used in anyone's bedroom. I'm not saying that there aren't sexy ways to ask that don't kill the mood, I'm saying that it's cumbersome to ask at every point, and that the onus …
/r/MensRights04/05/13 03:50 PM
0

But, and sadly it is the case, often the girl will not say no to sex when she does not want sex. Then it's on her. If you're such a fucking child that you need other people to tell you to use your big girl words, you simply shouldn't be having sex. Obviously we shouldn't coerce people, but if you're uncomfortable having sex, the onus is on you to communicate that, not for your partner to ask you if you're okay every other second.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 03:29 PM
-2

So to me the idea of enthusiastic consent breaks down into a couple of separate and contradictory notions. The first of which is that we should be more communicative about our desires in bed, rather than just going with the flow, hoping that our partners are mind readers. I'm all for this. I think that we should talk about what we want out of sex both before and during the act. Sitting there passively only breeds resentment in both parties. So if we're about to get it on, and you tell me how you…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:25 PM
8

But let's say that this rapist makes it clear to the girl that he would not be happy if she said no, that he expects her to say yes, maybe he's had violent tendencies in the past. Then that's clearly coercion, and definitely rape by any reasonable standard. she may feel obligated to have sex with you (possibly because of people on the internet saying things like, "Ugh, it's basically theft when you buy a girl dinner and she doesn't sleep with you"), or is scared of you leaving her if she doesn't…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:20 PM
6

I'm a woman who likes to make the first move, so how am I to tell if it's ok to grab him and passionately kiss before ripping each other's clothes off? You don't, welcome to the world men live in, here's your privilege, best of luck.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:13 PM
17

So, this app is obviously stupid and ridiculous. With that said, I'm beginning to lose track of the number of times it's been mentioned on this subreddit. It's not actually a dead horse anymore guys, it's just a reddish paste with some hooves in it. Also, I feel that there are some silver linings that don't get enough attention. First and foremost, it's sort of restored my faith in ladyfolk. If you look at the reviews, it's split down the middle. Half the women think it's brilliant, but the othe…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 12:48 AM
1

Your edit makes so little sense to me... The jobs that men are kept out of (homemaking, hairdressing, etc.) are often unpaid or minimum wage and with almost no social prestige attached to them. You say that like men and women both found out what jobs that they preferred (on average) and then god took all the money and divided it up so that men get most of it. To me it seems incredibly more likely that the inverse is true. Certain jobs have higher barriers to entry, or are more emotionally/physic…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 03:16 AM
1

SMV stands for sexual market value. Some prefer the term mate value. I like abbreviations, so I usually use SMV. Another thing I really enjoy about this sub is that it seems to realize that a person's lived experience is just a single anecdote. A single datum swimming in a sea of its compatriots. It is only when we compile all these data together and analyze them on an aggregate level that we can see meaningful trends. But even with this said, I don't feel that I have to tell you that your lived…
/r/MensRights01/04/13 04:26 AM
1

One of the reasons why I do enjoy this community is that they really pull no punches. Beliefs that feel good are almost always cast to the wayside in favor of those grounded in solid evidence. Admittedly, what you quoted probably wasn't the nicest way of saying it, but the message is spot on. As a woman, your SMV is entirely based off of your appearance. Entirely. Men have a SMV that derives partially from appearance of course, but also from wealth and influence. As time passes, people tend to a…
/r/MensRights31/03/13 10:11 PM
2

I wonder how many (Your Name)s are in your composition class? At any rate, put as much info on the web as you want, it's not my business really, but the MRM isn't really super popular, and Doxxing has been a thing. I'm just saying; you're a braver man than I. Also, I'm glad I was able to help.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 08:35 AM
7

I have a couple of thoughts: 1) You have far too much personal information in this post, you should strongly consider editing it. 2) The media does in fact shape our views - to question this seems almost silly to me. Thus it follows that it does shape our views on women, and perhaps not always for the best. I think don't think the way to go about this is by explicitly disagreeing with the video. 3) If you are interested in having a discussion that's less of a feminist circlejerk, the direction I…
/r/MensRights26/03/13 07:40 AM
1

What is feminism? Am I a feminist? I wanted to answer these questions, so one day I wandered over to askfeminists, and stated my opinion on rape, the pay gap, etc. Half said, "Yeah of course you're a feminist, you just want men and women to be equal." The other half said "You're definitely not a feminist, you said that people's actions influence their likelihood of being raped, that's clearly victim blaming. You also said the word cunt; clearly not feminist material." So there you go, I may or m…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:32 PM
1

That's an interesting point. I think I feel comfortable admitting that standards of beauty and grooming are at least partly influenced by societal convention. For instance, almost all women shave their underarm and leg hair, and shave/trim/wax their pubic hair. But overall, the evidence for human neoteny is pretty solid.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 07:39 AM
13

You know, this to me just reifies the ideas of female hypo agency and neoteny. Men can't act like children because we have obligations, or at least we should have obligations, to women and children. Trying to use the term woman child would be meaningless, as they're lumped in with the children anyway.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 01:16 AM
1

I get into a lot of arguments on reddit. Mostly I get responses that essentially boil down to, "You're wrong, because feelings." While I still think that a preference for competence in a field is fairly sexually directional, I do want to thank you for having a mature discussion.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 05:16 PM
1

how would anyone make sales? By providing a customer with a product or service that they actually needed. Sex is very intimate for a lot of people, and people spend years in therapy for things like this. It's much more rare that someone seeks therapy because a salesperson was manipulative. It's true, it doesn't usually lead directly to therapy. But if a person is persuaded into buying a car or house that they can't afford, this can bankrupt them and lead to serious financial difficulty. I guess …
/r/MensRights01/03/13 12:30 AM
1

A variety in tastes and preferences is hardly a refutation of my argument. You already agree with me that men have a variety of tastes and preferences. Yet it's still possible to sexualize a female character in a video game, despite the fact that no matter what you made her appearance, there would be some men who didn't find her appealing. (The gay one's come to mind, but even beyond that, some guys only like chubby chicks, some only find redheads appealing, some guys probably only find Asian ch…
/r/MensRights01/03/13 12:21 AM
1

And suddenly bam you did the thing you really didn't want to do, after a little "persuasion" from the salesman. It's shady, and sex shouldn't be like that. That's a good one, I may steal your analogy :P I'm glad you liked it. If you agree that it's a shady practice, don't you also think that car selling shouldn't be like that? What about other human interactions? I suspect that while you hope all human interaction would be based on mutual respect and communication rather than manipulation, you r…
/r/MensRights01/03/13 12:08 AM
0

Except that female's equate power with physical desirability. Jacked dude is a powerful dude is a desirable dude.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 09:14 AM
1

I'm not going to downvote you... but I don't have to upvote you. they were taking risks because their GENDER(different from sex) Those two things have a tremendous degree of overlap. Sex largely determines gender. As far as today goes, men aren't more likely to risk "failure/humiliation/death" more than women. Patently false, I could find statistics, but you should honestly just be able to look at the world around you and see who takes the highest risk jobs. Deep sea welders? Not mostly women yo…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:20 AM
30

This is beautiful. A shitty law is in place, but everyone involved seems kind of okay with giving it the finger.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:01 AM
2

If I'm in a conversation with someone and I feel they are becoming uncomfortable ... I end the conversation right there. How respectful of you. With that said, I don't think that actually does much to engage my argument. I still think that from a legal and social perspective, if someone really doesn't want to do something, the onus is on them to communicate that. The fact that you're good at reading between the lines and respecting the desires of your conversational partners is really cool, don'…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:46 PM
2

It is curious to me, that we presume implied consent in almost every facet of life. In almost every interaction I have, from conversation to fisticuffs, the implication is that if I'm uncomfortable with the interaction, the onus is on me to voice that discomfort and disengage. Sex, one of the most nuanced and intimate acts known to humanity, that relies very heavily on non-verbal communication is the only one I know where we think the best system is to get verbal consent for everything. At some …
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:54 PM
2

There are a good many states where the age of consent is 16. In many other states, romeo and juliet laws would ensure this isn't statutory rape. I'm sure in some other states this would be statutory rape, but you can't simply generalize that.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:47 PM
2

Looking at recent history, more women seems to equal lower scores and more student problems, with more male teachers equaling higher scores and less student problems. Then we go into single gender schools which out perform mixed gender schools by a landslide and have far less issues. (yes, even against other private schools...) If you have the studies for that, I'd love to see them. I'm not trying to call you out here, I'm just not particularly well-read on this topic. But if that's true, then p…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 07:12 AM
1

Well then it's fine I suppose, but I have serious doubts about how you would go about verifying whether or not it was harmful to anyone. I suspect it would be harmful to potential female teachers seeking employment. I suspect that harm would be unjustified if those potential female teachers were better equipped to teach children. It would also be harmful to the children who would have benefited from having a better teacher, but were instead stuck with an inferior male one. I mean, although I'm n…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 05:50 AM
3

There are no inalienable rights. If I lock you in my basement, what rights do you have? The concept of a "right" is entirely man-made and arbitrary. I'll agree feminists throw it around with a bit too much frequency, but there has to be a line somewhere.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 03:32 PM
4

Obviously within the context of my comment I'm using the word "right" in the sense of a justifiable action.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 05:28 PM
7

Okay, so I'm actually sort of okay with this article. If you give oral sex and want to receive oral sex, and your partner refuses to reciprocate, it doesn't make you a bad person to break up with them. The good bit, in my opinion, is the article she references at the top of hers. This article about a lady whose dude wouldn’t go down on her is very good, and you should read it. Okay Jill, let's go have a look. Here's an excerpt. In technical terms, we had agreed to date other people, but only hav…
/r/MensRights14/02/13 04:27 PM
2

That wasn't it at all actually, I was just replying to a guy with the username of "stopsayingfaggot" and thought I'd try to be funny. It apparently didn't go so well.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 04:47 AM
1

Quite alright good sir, I don't usually really look at the usernames when I'm scrolling through comments, I just thought it might be amusing for stopsayingfaggot.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:10 PM
-15

I really ^^<sup>faggot</sup> appreciate you pointing this out. ^^<sup>faggot</sup> It seems that /r/feminism has been ^^<sup>faggot</sup> irritated with the amount of trolling it was receiving and thus wanted to make sure that all the primary response comments were from feminists. I'm actually ^^<sup>faggot</sup> fine with this. To me however, it makes less sense in a subbreddit like /r/askfeminists which is more for debate/discussion. I get that you want to make sure that the question you've as…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 06:44 AM
2

I'm tall, so I don't personally have to deal with this specific brand of bullshit, but even still, reading these is an infuriating experience.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 08:14 AM
2

read my other comments yo The physical and sexual abuse of boys is one of those bigger battles, but there's nothing more we can do for this specific kid
/r/MensRights01/02/13 06:38 PM
0

Shouldn't preventing the sexual and physical abuse of young, defenseless boys be of highest priority not just to MRAs, but any reasonable people? Sorry if I wasn't clear, that was one of the bigger battles I was referring to. I just don't think dwelling on this case is the best way to accomplish that. As you said, nothing more can be done to help this particular child, and without any evidence, seeing this woman punished for her abuse is likely to be equally impossible.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 04:05 AM
-2

I don't doubt it, but technically, prudence only said that it wasn't legally punishable physical or sexual abuse. What happened was obviously fucked up, and it's useful to point out how this might have been received differently if the babysitter was male, but beyond that, I think we have bigger battles to fight.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 03:43 AM
1

I do feel a little uncomfortable when I'm walking home late from work and there is a lone man walking behind me - not because I believe all men are rapists but because I don't know which one might be. I don't have any problem with this statement, you can think or feel anything you want. I do however think that everyone should occasionally be reminded that their feelings may not correlate with reality. (For instance, I often hear women talk about how afraid they are to walk alone at night, and ho…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:38 PM
5

One I probably wouldn't frequent, but having said that, it's (presumably) a private establishment that can put whatever they want on the walls. It's a joke in poor taste, but less concerned with bad jokes than I am with the idea of circumcising infants who are unable to consent, an alimony and child support system that's designed to allow women to maintain the standard of living they had with their husband without having to work for it, selective service, etc.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:33 PM
3

agree completely If the internet can decide that it's a good idea to not stick your dick in crazy, why can't everyone agree that marrying crazy is an even worse idea?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 11:25 PM
3

I'm not sure why "victim blaming" is even a term. Do people that accuse others of "victim blaming" not realize that your actions affect the world, and that your life would have been different if you had acted differently? If I park a nice car in a bad neighborhood and leave it unlocked with the keys on the seat, and come back in three days to find it stolen, I would completely expect that others would inform me that I made some poor choices, and that even though it's not that I deserved to have …
/r/MensRights29/01/13 10:21 PM
43

If anything, this only strengthens the point that OP is trying to make. Getting a girls ears pierced is more easily reversed, less painful, less noticeable with fewer and less harmful complications. Even with all this being taken into account, it's still not something they want to subject their infant girls to, while still being okay with lopping off a part of their infant boy's penis.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 09:43 PM
4

probably not. It should, it probably won't.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:48 PM
0

it's as if every female is being judged as whether she's a suitable life partner rather than just purely by her actions That's exactly what it's like.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:51 PM
9

To be fair, we can't know that from the article, and it's unbecoming of us to make baseless assumptions that paints a picture where the girl is even more in the wrong. She acted like an idiot, no one's questioning that, but we don't have evidence to suggest that she lied to to him to get him to spar.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:01 AM
2

Eh, people downvote when they don't agree. I'm sorry that was your experience. I don't find the evidence for the medical benefits for circumcision to be compelling, and if it's not medically beneficial, I don't support doing it to people that can't consent. If you find the evidence for the medical benefits to be compelling, I understand how that would lead you to a different conclusion than the one I reached.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 06:04 AM
6

Her: You get to spend time with me, that's what you get out of this, and I get you to show me a good time. That seems fair to me... You know, I thought about what I would say if one of my friends said something like this to me, and I came to the conclusion that I would do my best to say scathing and hurtful things. I feel that it would be the only deserved response were I presented with a statement as egotistical and manipulative as this one. Then I pictured saying these things to friends of min…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:05 AM
3

In all fairness, it doesn't actually kill that many kids, I for the study I read it was about 100/year, and that might not have been just the US. However, on the issue of HIV, I don't consider this a good motivation for the procedure for a couple of reasons. The first is that the majority of the studies that find circumcision to be beneficial have serious methodological issues, not the least of which is that they are almost all carried out in high risk populations, mostly in Africa. There seems …
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:15 AM
9

Okay, you asked two questions. why circumcision is being referred to a "genital mutilation" Well, that one's fairly simple. to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts. They injured your penis by removing the foreskin. The foreskin has several uses. It shields a mucus membrane that was never meant to be exposed, and it has a metric shit ton of nerve endings. It's not the most important part of your body, but it's still useful. As for your second question why…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 02:02 AM
6

Every time I hear something like this I can only think, "Who's got two thumbs and is never marrying?"
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:13 PM
2

I'm just lucky I'm weak To which you reply If you are doing this to loved ones, your physical strength is not necessarily what will damage them most. The deepest wounds are invisible. Which is why she's lucky - the invisible wounds don't land you in jail super often.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:10 AM
5

I think it's a commentary on how video games are (were?) a male space. A last bastion of competition and banter brooks no complaints about hurt feelings. If you can't take the heat get out of the kitchen. Now we're told that our video games aren't sufficiently inclusive of women.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:47 AM
2

You would be surprised how many people lack that. edit: Or perhaps you wouldn't, who am I to say?
/r/MensRights05/12/12 11:13 PM
2

I have a lot more respect for you now.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:45 PM
4

I mean, I liked the commercial; mostly. But what in the actual fuck was up with the naked guy?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:29 AM
1

I upvoted you anyway. If you were proper, we wouldn't like you as much. This entire subreddit should be fairly invested with decrying the concept of being proper.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:30 AM
1

Sounds shitty. Really though, I just popped in to say that your English is actually pretty good. If you hadn't have said anything, I would have assumed you're American.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 07:20 AM
1

No, I'm still happy being a guy, but then I haven't really hit the dating scene at all. I'm happy just being single and hanging out with my friends. Perhaps when I start seriously looking for a girlfriend I'll realize how many hoops we really have to go through and revise my opinion. For now though, I like talking about cars and guns and computers, I like being tall, I like being really sarcastic and occasionally a little loud. I have a feeling that if I were a girl, these interests would be fro…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 12:37 AM
3

I don't really frequent the club scene because I don't really drink. While I have gone once or twice, I've never used a restroom there. (again, I don't really drink) With that in mind, this actually happens? I mean Jesus, that's creepy as fuck.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:39 AM
5

If I'm loud and sarcastic (which I usually am) that tends to go okay for me. Females have a harder time finding acceptance when they display similar behavior. The flipside is, if I want to talk about my feelings or wear nail polish, I'm a bit SOL. Pick your poison.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 05:39 PM
1

I still really hope that this is an incredibly elaborate troll, or perhaps more accurately some dude indulging a fetish or something through the power of reddit. If the story actually goes as the OP claims it does, that makes me incredibly sad for the OP. He's obviously the victim of some serious emotional manipulation/abuse.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 05:28 PM
1

No, he posted some verification farther down in the comments. At the very least, there is a dude wearing a chastity device. We can't confirm the rest of his story.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 05:01 PM
12

"Hit me so I can get somebody to fuck you up." That sentence really says all that needs to be said about that interaction.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 04:44 PM
2

Not for me, but if it makes you happy, fuck yes, go for it. Your courage for refusing to back down in the face of social stigma is laudable.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 02:41 AM
1

Perhaps it would have been more apt to say "There was no penetration" Depending on where you are and how that place defines things, that may be sexual assault instead of rape.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 02:35 AM
1

Here the tests are closer to about 50% I wish they were worth more, as I've found a pretty strong correlation between how many points the tests account for and my grade in the class.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 05:30 AM
3

I have no idea where you live, but here in the midwest it's mostly homework that determines your grades. There are tests of course, but those are pretty easy, even in college if you study for an hour or 2. The fact that I'm not willing to spend more than an hour or 2 a week on homework hurts my grades as much or more than anything else.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 11:07 PM
6

The entire article is so patently ridiculous I didn't know whether to be amused or incensed. Surely she's an outlier and that even most females can tell exactly how full of shit she is right? Right?
/r/MensRights04/11/12 11:05 PM
5

I actually considered making a separate post for this comparison, but we've already had a couple posts of the crazy lady on the train. So let me lay it down for you. In the OP's video the crazy woman slaps/hits at least 2 guys, shoves a couple of others and spits on and verbally abuses everyone else. In retaliation, the rest of the train tells her off, pours water on her and eventually escorts her off the train with minimal force. After she's been (surprisingly, or perhaps more aptly, unsurprisi…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 01:30 PM
3

I mean, I don't think the intention is to force an abortion. I do think it does limit her options a bit if she's not super well off, but on some level, that's just too bad. It's necessary to restore balance to the rights of men and women.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 06:50 PM
3

An abortion results in neither parent having to financially support the child. A financial abortion results in a single person financially supporting the potential child. Fixed that for you. Ultimately, women still have the choice to not be financially responsible for the child. They can make another couple (as is the case with adoption) responsible, or they can make the state responsible (by taking advantage of the safe haven laws, present in all 50 states) Edit: To clarify my position, I belie…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:54 PM
3

Re-read your last sentence but remove the word financial. That is the exact argument that rightwing douchenozzles use to try and outlaw abortion. If you're for abortion, because it allows women more freedom, why are you against financial abortion, which allows men the same freedom?
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:05 PM
4

headfirst?
/r/MensRights22/10/12 03:56 AM
2

I ain't even mad, that shit's hilarious.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 02:09 AM
1

Thank you, I really appreciate that, although I do feel like you may need to hit up /r/bestof or /r/defaultgems as those subreddits churn out posts that are more insightful than mine with comforting frequency.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:51 PM
2

We label ourselves all the time, alpha is merely shorthand for independent/confident and beta is shorthand for dependent/supplicating. It's worth pointing out that this not synonymous with objectively good or objectively bad man. My father is one of the best men I know. He's a great dad, a great engineer, a good husband, etc. But he does in a lot of ways determine his value from his relationships with women. Does he currently have a woman in his life? Is he providing for her adequately? These ar…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 01:22 AM
8

I'm not an expert, but I'll do my best. Hopefully one of us will learn something. (I don't mean that sarcastically, if I'm wrong, I want to learn from this experience.) But be warned, I'm probably going to end up launching into an evo-psych lecture, as I so often do when confronted with questions of gender and societal norms. With what little experience I have with the seduction community, I find it most useful to describe alpha in the negative; that is to say, not beta. Beta males are males who…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 01:03 AM
8

I hear where you're coming from, but I think if you're in this sub you probably agree that we should stop putting women on a pedestal. It's bad for women and worse for men when we engage in that behavior. Men who constantly put women on a pedestal are, in a certain way, indeed a subclass of a kind. They have yet to realize their own self-worth, independent of female reinforcement or justification. I don't think we should shame them, but we should encourage them to be comfortable with themselves,…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:57 PM
3

The problem with this is that societal norms are everywhere, and affect everyone. To say that our choices aren't real choices or that we're "coerced" by expectations that are placed on us is simply a red herring. Societal norms affect men as well as women. To say that these societal norms uniquely restrict a woman's agency, but pose no threat to a man's is simply false. Couple this with the question of where did these norms come from? Well, the answer seems fairly obvious. Gender roles arose fro…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:15 PM
3

She's going to turn out great. Do you know why? Because you won't lie to her, just like your dad didn't lie to you, and his father didn't to him. This will be a girl who's down to earth and honest with herself and others; and that right there, that's a recipe for healthy social interaction, and a good life in general.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:00 PM
3

I'm pretty sure I've heard similar things from other sources that were concerned with more modern day type eunuchs, but don't remember well enough to cite the source. But even working under the idea that eunuchs live longer, who gives a fuck? I'd agree to lose 10 years off my life right now if the alternative is having my nuts cut off. In fact, how is this MensRights material anyway?
/r/MensRights25/09/12 01:10 AM
1

Wow, I was actually angry with you for like a solid 15 seconds before I realized you were trolling. Well done sir; carry on.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:35 PM
1

what good does your openion bring? That's not my decision - that analysis is the responsibility of the person asking for my opinion. why does it seem counter-intuitive to you to NOT be constructive? Or, worded different, why does it seem intuitive to me, to be constructive? Well, presuming that you're defining constructive as "promoting improvement or development" then let's plug that back in. It makes sense to me to promote improvement and development. - I feel this is a statement most people w…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:14 PM
1

If when you say boys or girls, you mean legal minors who don't get a say in what surgeries are performed on them, or are too young to understand the implications of those surgeries, then I agree, completely unacceptable. Unfortunately, I have this nasty habit of using the term boys or (especially) girls to refer to legal adults, because I'm in college, and despite the fact that these people can vote, there are many who are certainly still children in terms of how mature they are.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 10:46 AM
1

I disagree. If I'm asked for my opinion I feel like I should share it. Withholding information for someone else's benefit seems exceptionally counter-intuitive to me. On a somewhat related topic, if you're looking for new reading material, I recommend Lying, by Sam Harris.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 09:23 AM
1

It's perfectly acceptable to prefer girls without their clits. It's unacceptable to insist that all girls have their clits removed against their will to comply with your desires. You could certainly say that you won't date a girl that still has her clitoris, but you can't go around hacking at infants' fun bits. There's a clear difference.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 11:44 PM
2

It seemed like most of the highly voted comments did in fact call her out. I think the problem is that we're all internet tough; challenging social norms is no problem when you're never going to meet the person you're having the discussion with. In real life however, the social dynamics change dramatically, and I suspect that virtually no one stuck up for the OP in class or the lunchroom, even if they felt he was being treated unfairly.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 11:41 PM
1

Circumcision isn't inherently wrong, no more so than any other cosmetic surgery. It's wrong for the same reason it would be wrong to give a tattoo to an infant. It's not necessary, it's a change that stays with them for life, and they didn't get a say. However if you as an adult (of either sex) would like your genitals to look or feel different than they currently do, and think that surgery can help with that, then bully for you, I don't have a problem with that. I just don't want people doing i…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 11:33 PM
1

Their bodies did not align to his preferences, his preferences ... shaped their bodies. Did you seriously just say that? No one changed their bodies to be more in accordance with what he wanted, but what he wanted shaped their bodies... What I said was, How their body came to align with his preference has no bearing on what his preferences are or should be. That is, if I like skinny girls, I don't care if she has a high metabolism or if she makes a conscious effort to eat well and get to the gym…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 11:28 PM
2

But that's not a fair comparison. She said as a woman who prefers circumcised dicks So the equivalent would probably be saying something like as a guy who prefers bigger boobs Nevermind the fact that she spent the rest of the post explaining why the girl's actions/comments as described by the OP were definitely not okay, and how really to her, it wasn't that big of a deal, she just prefers circumcised ones. Furthermore, the OP was asking for opinions/advice/etc. and her preference was relevant. …
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:59 PM
1

And why should it? How their body came to align with his preference has no bearing on what his preferences are or should be. The only thing I care about is that he is not using violence or coercion (or supporting people that use violence or coercion) to change the bodies of others so that they are more to his liking.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:46 PM
2

I don't disagree, but it doesn't make that opinion wrong or evil.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:44 PM
1

Which I think would also be acceptable, provided that she didn't have that procedure forced on her. In fact, I could say "I prefer women who have had their left hand chopped off." And although that would certainly be odd, and perhaps even sadistic or cruel, it's still okay to have that preference, as long as you're not going about chopping off ladies' hands against their will so that it would align with your preference.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:32 PM
3

I'm not sure why that makes your blood boil if I'm honest. Is she not allowed to have an opinion? Lots of guys like girls with bigger boobs, or smaller boobs, or whatever. Everyone has preferences, and if you're so inclined you can get surgery to alter your body to align better with the preferences of the majority of the opposite sex. In that respect, I don't see how circumcision is all that different than a breast enlargement/reduction. My problem with circumcision is that, at least in America,…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:21 PM
36

I've read through the comments and haven't found it yet, so I guess I'll say it. Let's play an old MRA favorite - swap the genders. If you had been fingering her and she said "Stop" and you kept doing it - that's automatically rape in anyone's eyes. You may not feel like it was rape, or choose not to identify it as such, but make no mistake; if we flip the script, and you pulled this shit on her, feminists and women everywhere would instantly identify you as a rapist. Hitting you for verbal bant…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 05:12 AM
1

If they're physically attacking you, then go for it I guess. I'd go for the neck though, you've got the larynx and carotid arteries, and people generally don't think to protect it the way they do their balls. It's just a bonus that it's seen as more acceptable in society than going for a nutshot.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 12:57 PM
2

Fuck it, upvotes for all.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 02:43 PM
1

Depends on the situation - most states have stop and identify laws, but some don't. Even in those though, you're obligated to carry a drivers license and registration when you're driving. But yeah, at least in my state there is no stop and identify law - so even if a LEO has reasonable suspicion that I've committed a crime, I can legally refuse to provide identification if I'm just walking around and an officer accosts me with a Terry stop. (It is worth pointing out however, that I'm not the one…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 11:41 PM
2

Short answer: No.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 06:36 AM
3

In the article, you used the word "idol" when you should have said "idle" that is all. Actually, I lied, that isn't all. I rather wish we had more backstory, but it does sound interesting. Keep us update.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 12:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter