TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

n0tqu1tesane Archive

View 38 posts and 441 comments by n0tqu1tesane on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
205

Progressn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights04/10/19 07:59 PM
110

Edu./Occu.n0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:16 PM
76

Feminismn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights14/01/26 02:56 AM
61

Healthn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights07/03/20 09:55 PM
59

False Accusationn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights29/09/23 01:32 AM
58

Social Issuesn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights13/05/19 07:08 PM
48

mental healthn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights26/04/26 01:22 AM
47

Legal Rightsn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights03/02/20 01:11 AM
46

Marriage/Childrenn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights23/01/20 07:29 AM
35

Activism/Supportn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights31/08/23 11:40 PM
32

Legal Rightsn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights06/02/26 12:24 AM
30

Social Issuesn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights12/05/19 01:40 AM
30

Activism/Supportn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights11/08/23 02:41 AM
24

Legal Rightsn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights18/02/22 02:37 AM
23

Edu./Occu.n0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights22/06/23 09:26 AM
23

Generaln0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights23/04/19 04:11 AM
21

Activism/Supportn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights21/11/23 10:06 PM
21

n0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights24/01/16 08:19 PM
18

Activism/Supportn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights30/09/17 05:47 AM
17

Marriage/Childrenn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights14/08/23 12:52 AM
16

Edu./Occu.n0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights10/07/19 10:41 PM
16

n0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights26/02/21 01:10 AM
14

Edu./Occu.n0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights13/09/17 11:27 PM
13

Intactivismn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights27/05/23 06:21 AM
11

Healthn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights21/09/19 07:28 PM
11

Activism/Supportn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights06/10/21 10:51 PM
9

Social Issuesn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights28/09/16 10:57 PM
9

Legal Rightsn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights10/07/19 10:46 PM
8

Activism/Supportn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights20/11/20 03:33 AM
8

Generaln0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights28/04/15 08:56 PM
7

Discussionn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights24/04/14 03:08 AM
5

Legal Rightsn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights14/08/21 01:38 AM
5

Generaln0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights10/06/23 02:01 PM
5

Generaln0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:52 AM
4

Fathers/Custodyn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights31/05/15 11:20 PM
2

Legal Rightsn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights18/02/22 02:37 AM
0

Social Issuesn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights22/07/15 09:30 PM
0

Humourn0tqu1tesane/r/MensRights01/06/19 03:47 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

My uncle is a stepfather and is a well-respected person in his community. My best friend divorced her husband after he beat her and their son. She hated her new husband so much that she had four more boys, then adopted two girls and another boy In my own case, I was set to marry a lady with two kids; her priest told her to go back to her ex. He beat her to death. There are a lot of stepfathers out there, you can't just lump them all into one group.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 04:33 AM
1

He was also probably sterile.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 04:22 AM
2

I was 14 when it went down, so my mind automatically adds about 15 years. But yeah, 40s
/r/MensRights26/04/26 03:44 PM
0

The Iraq veteran always throws me for a loop. Like I was a kid during Desert Storm, the younger vets should be in their sixties!
/r/MensRights26/04/26 03:17 PM
2

There are a lot of things I disagree with Eric on, including some points expressed in this video. But overall, I think what he's saying needs to be heard by the young men of today.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 01:23 AM
0

No, you should have used the comma. I gave ChatGPT this prompt: Point out the grammatical errors in this paragraph. Don't make any other suggestions or comments: Whenever you see someone talk about SA people always assume the victim was a woman and rarely bring up the fact that men and boys can also be assaulted, Here's what it said: Missing comma after “SA” → “Whenever you see someone talk about SA, people…” Missing comma after “people” (to separate clauses) → “…people always assume…” Missing c…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 04:36 AM
-4

Whenever you see someone talk about SA people[.] Why not just say South Africans? Do you say "US people"? "NZ people"?
/r/MensRights15/04/26 11:10 PM
2

Mods, can we ban AI titles?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/26 02:38 AM
1

I don't know if he will, but I've asked Leonard to participate in this discussion.
/r/MensRights06/02/26 12:31 AM
1

Why not? Feminism, like men's rights, is old enough that there is no central definition.
/r/MensRights18/01/26 09:37 AM
1

What are you talking about? This was a failure by a lady. There are a lot of great debaters on both sides, for instance Karen Straughan and Wendy McElroy. While she can improve, Pearl isn't in their class. She's not even as good as a junior high debate team yet.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 02:34 AM
12

Most likely it's a plea deal. Is this state or federal charges? What are the respective cases? Seperate charges?
/r/MensRights05/01/26 12:54 PM
1

Ok, how are they different?
/r/MensRights04/01/26 07:39 PM
3

So they're the feminist version of "Men Going Their Own Way"? My opinion is that both sides of that coin are wrong, but all I ask of either is to refrain from violence.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 06:18 PM
4

Their sidebar is empty. What do they even claim to be?
/r/MensRights04/01/26 04:16 PM
1

Could you please repeat that in English?
/r/MensRights03/12/25 06:36 PM
2

There is /r/menkampf.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 08:42 PM
-2

I did round numbers
/r/MensRights09/11/25 08:47 PM
-11

Are you familiar with the one half plus seven rule? It was popularized by Little Women, but it predates the book by about a quarter century. A bride should be one half her husband's age, plus seven years. I treat in as a moderatly hard floor (18 being a hard floor). If she's just under seven years, but something is exceptional, I may let it slide. Like my last GF was a polyglot (and was also in range) But for a 25-year-old, the math is (½*25)+7=19.5. if we use the inverse formula for a top end, …
/r/MensRights09/11/25 04:32 PM
-12

She will have no choice if there is a court order
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/25 05:54 AM
17

The child support isn't for the mother. Unfortunately, there is legal precedent for requiring the victim to pay. IANAL, but I think the best he can do is sue her for the cost of raising the child. Not that you can get blood from a stone.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/25 01:56 AM
1

Have you read the constitution? "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." -- US Constitution, Amendment IV People have a right to privacy. What is the probable cause that would justify a search? Remember tha…
/r/MensRights20/03/25 03:42 AM
-10

Yes. To start it violates both the fourth and fifth amendment. It may also violate the first.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 03:59 PM
1

What does UFC have to do with Mens rights?
/r/MensRights19/01/25 05:00 AM
6

That is incorrect. Assuming you mean in the United States, that (dis)honor goes to Joseph Semmes in 1840.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 04:43 AM
0

She wasn't the first.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 04:32 AM
5

Birthing a child.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 10:04 PM
3

Uh, this says nothing. How about a video or a transcript?
/r/MensRights11/12/24 03:11 AM
3

One thing that is unclear to me: how old was she when the crime took place? Because if she was under eighteen when it happened, that does explain a lighter sentence, but not a one-year sentence. Ten or twenty would be more reasonable for a minor.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 06:02 AM
1

None of them were daughters?
/r/MensRights19/09/24 01:21 PM
3

OP, you should ask in /r/askhistorians.
/r/MensRights16/09/24 10:11 PM
1

Maybe they've wives, mothers, sisters, or daughters?
/r/MensRights16/09/24 10:09 PM
1

I don't tell them how to practice their religion (or lack of). They can darn well return the courtesy.
/r/MensRights16/09/24 10:07 PM
3

Why should I know who Billie is?
/r/MensRights14/09/24 06:26 AM
2

I have no idea who he is, or why I should care. Was he elected or appointed? Which city or state?
/r/MensRights14/09/24 04:16 AM
2

Class action suit to end this. IANAL, but I think small claims is better. Costs Meta more, and the victim receives more for their effort. Meta would nice quickly of paying $15 plus court costs, not to mention having to keep sending paralegals to random court houses.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 07:29 AM
1

What does this have to do with men's rights, bot?
/r/MensRights26/05/24 12:48 AM
2

No, I know how to survive in the woods.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 11:03 PM
3

Well, if you know you won't survive, you might as well end things quickly.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 07:13 AM
5

First, "usually" shouldn't matter. The law should be concerned with relevent facts Second, don't carry a knife for self defense. It requires contact to use, and if taken from you, it can be used up to infinate times. The survivor rate of a gun shot is three times greater than that of a puncture wound. You say you're small. And I'm big. But you probably could beat me up. Why? Because I'm older, and disabled. It comes down te "disparity of force". Hitting a minor is not out of the question. The qu…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:30 AM
15

Laughed at: This is all on video. So what?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/24 06:32 AM
2

Technically the whole state, but each county must qualify by population size. Too lazy to go back to Wikipedia, but I think it said six were too big. So if enough people moved...
/r/MensRights14/03/24 09:29 PM
5

And it's wrong. It's been legal in Nevada since 1971, and not actively procecuted before that.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 08:23 PM
173

Which is why even a slow 1911 beats 911.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/24 09:25 PM
2

The fact my appointment isn't for three more days. Edit: Btw, why do you assume the fault lies in the members of this sub?
/r/MensRights23/02/24 04:19 PM
1

From my subs, I have heard these people discuss, in friendly terms, men: Uncivil Law SugarTits Rekieta Law Prince Tyler natalielawyerchick MyNameIsJosephine Mikhaila Peterson Liberty Doll Lauren Chen Julie Borowski Jordan B Peterson Daisy Cousens Cassie Jaye Candace Owens Also, honorable mentions, since CRS Firearms has gone to prison, his wife has taken over his channel, and most of her videos are in support of her husband, and his legal status. I give my money to two YouTubers, the other one b…
/r/MensRights21/02/24 07:57 AM
1

DSP? Digital Signal Processor
/r/MensRights21/02/24 06:19 AM
-3

[C]ivic responsibility like the military[.] The military is subject to civil authority, so those responsible for it are both men and women. Indirectly, every citizen is responsible, through their vote. Equality has nothing to do with responsibility. Our founding document starts its second paragraph with these words: "We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights[.]". Nowhere did that document's nor …
/r/MensRights21/02/24 03:03 AM
6

Do you know why women can't find a kind, decent, caring man? Those men already have boyfriends.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 08:24 PM
1

Two very similar posts by to very similar usernames. Are you a bot or a troll?
/r/MensRights13/02/24 08:21 PM
1

Murder 2. You did read the plea deal, didn't you?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/24 03:43 AM
1

No government should have the power to kill.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/24 03:37 AM
2

I'm a semi-regular in fp, downvoted a lot, but not banned. I am banned in law, partially for being a MRA.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 05:22 AM
2

/r/facepalm doesn't.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 05:16 AM
1

Hel, asking or facetime is good. I don't want to be involved with anyone who espouses closed source software.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 07:28 PM
1

Source?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/23 01:42 AM
1

Like I said, sentimental. My first presidential election I voted for her. Then again twenty four years later.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 07:46 PM
1

He's pro-slavery.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 07:09 PM
1

Hoping Jo will run again, although mostly for sentimental reasons.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 07:09 PM
-21

I think you need to stop letting autism define you.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 10:17 AM
1

No, the link for this site is here.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 01:58 AM
6

Just spotted this. Can't watch, as I'm on a public bus; but Kurt is one of two Youtubers I give my money to, he's generally good. And it looks like Nate is there, he's a law school teacher.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 01:35 AM
1

We could have had JoJo, but people are too stupid to vote third party.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 12:47 AM
7

[M]en are not raped[.] Doesn't California have the highest prison population in the US?
/r/MensRights29/09/23 12:45 AM
0

I'm a traditionalist, and normally think the man should pay. But there are exceptions. If it is decided beforehand, the lady can pay. If she wishes to cancel out any "debt", she can signal that by paying. But the most important thing is honesty up front. If you ask a girl out, or accept a date, decide before you order who pays.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 12:42 AM
5

File a DMCA takedown.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 12:36 AM
1

How do MRAs plan to tackle the issue of bad fathers since that's a paradoxical (generational) issue that affects boys that turn into men that continue the cycle? You don't bother to define what a "bad father" is, and assume is is the responsibility of MRAs to fix an undefined problem. You then go on to imply boy who has had a bad father will become one himself, making it an unbreakable cycle. I had a bad father. I don't think that means I would be one, and am rather insulted that I am assumed no…
/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:03 AM
1

I am of the opinion that the rule "a bride should be one-half the age of the groom, plus seven years" is a minimum, and even then there is some flexibility. If it works out your minimum is seventeen, then you should raise it to eighteen; likewise dropping your lower limit from twenty five to twenty four is acceptable. This suggests the math can be used in reverse.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 11:42 PM
2

It’s a very dull idea to assume that the things wrong with Syria and Afghanistan are how they treat women. [S]trict gender responsibilities were a symptom more than a cause. I would us the word "roles" instead of responsibilities, but yes, it is definitely a symptom. Consider what Heinlein said: "It is a bad sign when the people of a country stop identifying themselves with the country and start identifying with a group. A racial group. Or a religion. Or a language. Anything, as long as it isn’t…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 05:56 AM
-6

Look at how men are treated in the western countries. So, should I call that toxic femininity too? If you want to. It is possible for both to exist. In this case, it is largely location based, but you used an absolute, which includes the entire world.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 05:14 AM
-15

Toxic masculimity does not exist[.] You are wrong. Look at how women are treated in Afghanistan, Syria, and Yemen. Or other countries in that region.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 03:58 AM
1

Yep. Benefits everyone. "Rights" are not pie. More for one group does not mean less for another.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 08:18 PM
2

That is not a bad thing.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 07:23 PM
2

I presumed the company they work for is a psychotherapy company. https://www.comprehensiveliferesources.org/ I'm unsure if they are a state actor. When I started I thought they were, but never confirmed it. Some changes since then make me unsure. If this i true, the fact they don't already have specific awareness of male suicide is odd at least imo. I had trouble finding reference, and am about to contact my therapist about it. We've gone to "every other" week, so I won't actually talk to her un…
/r/MensRights01/09/23 07:43 PM
2

Your therapist's company. Ok, the company she works for. Is that better? [I] would assume a therapy company would be in favour of awareness of male mental health decline[.] The impression I was given is they support recognizing IMD. It's just a question of how they will do so. I'm on my third therapist, my last left to work with DOC, and the first followed her husband to Spain. I've never been given any impression of anti man bias by any of them.
/r/MensRights01/09/23 04:41 AM
1

So your sources say actual divorce rate is 31% and you somehow think that's "good"? Where did you get 31%? Last link says 8.2% and falling. When you factor in miserable marriages that do not end up in divorce there's at least a 50% chance or things ending up bad or disastrous. Again, give me a citation. I won't disagree there are bad marriages that for whatever reason(s) are not ended, but don't use a number because it sounds good, use facts. Social media is only a recent phenomenon. Where did y…
/r/MensRights27/08/23 11:54 AM
1

Technically true, but not equivalent.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 11:30 AM
1

Lawyers tell their women clients to say they were manipulated/ pressured into signing the prenup and that’s one of the ways they get thrown out. This still has to be proven, and is easy to avoid.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 05:30 AM
-2

Lawyers have successfully been able to argue that a woman was ‘under duress’ in signing a prenuptial agreement. Proper planning can eliminate this arguement. [L]awyers advocating for these women characterize this situation as having so much ‘pressure’ wrapped up in the signing of this document that the woman signed it ‘under duress’[.] Again, proper planning. I believe this happened to Dr. Dre famously. No idea who that is. What is his degree in? What it means is that, since this tactic worked, …
/r/MensRights27/08/23 05:29 AM
-2

According to Bing, prenuptial agreements are overturned 50% of the time: Again, show me the study. All you gave me is an unfree search engine quoting a law firm. You did not show where that number came from.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 05:16 AM
-4

And why were they overturned? Were they worse than the laws at time of signing? Was there a major legal event that changed alimony laws? "If it can't be expressed in figures, it is not science; it is opinion."--RAH
/r/MensRights27/08/23 03:35 AM
0

The system is designed to F the man over financially no matter what. Then show me the laws that support your allegation.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 02:50 AM
-2

The first 2 don't require a legal marriage. No they don't. But they are still a benefit of marriage.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 02:48 AM
1

Ok, show proof. I want to know how the studies that support your statistics were done. There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 02:46 AM
1

Again, I'd like to see statistics. My thought is very few are nullified, or we would be seeing it much more often in the news.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 02:40 AM
-2

Marriage doesn't guarantee sex, no. Which is why I said usually. Domestic chores are a non-issue. Well, I was thinking more of a traditional marriage where he is the primary breadwinner, and she did most of the cooking and cleaning. But even DINKs at worst are splitting chores, even if unevenly. Traditionally, domestic chores were divided by location, inside is her job, outside his. That's not to say either only worked their side of the wall, just that physical ability is a factor. Insurance is …
/r/MensRights27/08/23 02:36 AM
-4

Can you show a statistic that supports that? Can you define the word "many", an it is used here?
/r/MensRights27/08/23 12:30 AM
-6

Nothing? Not a usually willing sex partner? Not someone to share domestic chores? Marriage doesn't affect your insurance?
/r/MensRights27/08/23 12:01 AM
-11

You can get a prenup. As long as it is no outrageously punitive, it should hold up in a divorce.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 11:57 PM
1

Yes, and yes. The trick is picking the right wife or husband. I don't know the stats, but I'd guess most marriages would be considered good by those married for long periods of time. The "fifty percent divorce rate" is bad math. For instance, the widely quoted 50% divorce rate in the US probably came from a best-guess prediction that has yet to come true, or from a shortcut method of comparing the number of divorces and marriages in the same year. This is not considered to be an accurate method …
/r/MensRights26/08/23 11:55 PM
2

Are you my friends mom? The picture of him and his wife at her prom is a bit amusing. It looks like she took someone from junior high with her.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/23 10:52 PM
1

I'm obese, so yes, I do require potential dates to weigh less than I do.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/23 10:48 PM
0

And yet FGM still happens in western countries. Unlike MGM, it is not done in a sterile environment. Again, it is a cultural issue. We need to change how people think.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 10:57 PM
2

My position is cultural, and then legal. You need public opinion first.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 07:54 AM
-5

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. 20 km overview. Why Does the Bible Say About Circumcision and Why is it Important?. (sic) Rabbinic Sources on Circumcision. Bodily Integrity and Male Circumcision: An Islamic Perspective. Circumcision. Note that I didn't read a…
/r/MensRights20/08/23 07:51 AM
2

Can parents make religious claims on behalf of their infant children? In the United States, yes. I'm no legal expert but I doubt religious aspects will trump fundamental rights of bodily integrity. Look into the age of responsibility. It differs by culture, and law, but is generally between eight and twelve. One well known example for young men starts with the subject claiming, "Today, I am a man.". Anything under that age the child is generally assumed not to have bodily integrity, their parent…
/r/MensRights20/08/23 07:29 AM
2

You tempt me, but it requires registration. Also, I never see in these petitions how the religious aspect would be applied without violating the first amendment.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 06:22 AM
1

This is long, but well worth watching. Hint: watch at 1.5x speed. Edit: actual video starts at about 19:00.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 12:53 AM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 09:01 PM
6

Why not contact them? I'm assuming the site has a address listed? A simple registering registered letter listing your attempts to contact them (dates and methods), probably will be sufficient. If not, you can decide what you want to do. I'd do a chargeback, but that's me. Also, did you check your spam directory? If you had to register with them to buy, what does your account online say?
/r/MensRights09/08/23 08:58 PM
1

https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/sexual-assault-male-inmates-prison-setting https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna8778153 https://wp.wwu.edu/prison/mistreatment/sexual-victimization/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2438589/ https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/victim-perpetrator-and-incident-characteristics-sexual-victimization-youth If you want to go further, the search term I used was "rate of sexual assault in juvenile prison for men".
/r/MensRights05/08/23 05:32 AM
1

Because the is a higher rate of sexual assert of all kinds against both juvenile and adult male prisoners than non incarcerated males. It is also not only commonly ignored, but also ridiculed.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 01:28 PM
2

By "boys" and "girls", to you mean minor children? And are you including incarcerated individuals?
/r/MensRights04/08/23 01:05 AM
2

And The Red Pill is on prime for free.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 12:52 AM
4

It didn't say it happened sixteen years ago. It said he had been paying for sixteen years.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 09:32 AM
0

I think this violates the no dox rule. Iwould suggest editing your post.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 09:31 AM
2

My father was supposed to pay $100 a kid.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 09:29 AM
1

Isn't this about child support, not alimony?
/r/MensRights02/08/23 09:27 AM
-15

The death penalty is wrong. No government should have the power to kill its citizens. If later a person is found to be innocent, they can be released from jail. They cannot be revived.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/23 09:14 AM
86

Missing septic tank cleaners, garbage truck tailgunners, and ditch diggers.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 04:09 AM
1

Murder isn't legal.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/23 03:47 AM
2

How would the child be harmed?
/r/MensRights27/07/23 11:41 PM
6

Men and women should be treated equally.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 04:18 AM
4

Then the other parent should receive the same.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 11:40 PM
1

Alimony, and child support are two separate things. I'm unsure what my Mom's alimony was, but it ended way before child support did. And before anyone says anything, child support was $100 per child per month.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/23 09:29 PM
1

However he has many good points and perhaps he is aware of bias but knows it could destroy his reputation to say it. Yeah, there were parts I disagreed with, but I found it interesting enough to share.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 08:50 PM
-7

He is wrong about that "there is no feminist conspiracy, the natural advantage of women were revealed as barriers against them were removed". But does the action you list fit the definition of a conspiracy? If two people do the same thing, but do not communicate, it cannot be a conspiracy.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 10:03 AM
7

Some interesting bits from the transcript: [A]nybody who really cares about boys and men has to care about racial injustice and economic inequality. And anybody who really cares about racial injustice and economic inequality has to care about boys and men. It's not that girls are smarter than boys. There's no gender gap in intelligence levels in either direction. It is just that girls develop more of these non-cognitive skills, these "chemistry homework" skills, somewhat earlier than boys do. Th…
/r/MensRights22/06/23 09:56 AM
2

The official app is incompatible with screen readers. As an Autistic person, I find it too flashy. Reddit is looking at severely restricting NSFW subs and content. You might think that means porn. But it can also refer to health issues, including circumcision. This isn't the only source, alternatives are on the sidebar.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 03:47 PM
2

2023-06-12 through 2023-06-14 unless plans change.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 02:09 PM
1

Another vote for dark.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/23 10:36 AM
5

"In the United States, 70-80% of all males are circumcised at birth. We’ve been led to believe that circumcision is sanitary, but as Candace shows, the evidence might not support this. She also reveals the ugly truth about the ways in which hospitals are raking in money from selling infant foreskins to the beauty industry for use in skin creams." OP has not yet watched this, so cannot offer comment on it.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 06:28 AM
7

Fuck paywalls.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 11:31 PM
2

Ah. Didn't RTFA.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 04:11 PM
2

What about their husbands?
/r/MensRights25/05/23 04:07 PM
1

What state? Pretty sure it's not America, more likely some part of the British Commonwealth.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 12:05 PM
1

From his daughter?
/r/MensRights26/03/23 04:50 AM
1

Missed that. But I can't find corresponding code. I'm going to have to find the court transcript.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/23 04:02 AM
1

Where did you find the guidelines?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/23 03:44 AM
2

New York law: § 130.35 Rape in the first degree. A person is guilty of rape in the first degree when he or she engages in sexual intercourse with another person: 1. By forcible compulsion; or 2. Who is incapable of consent by reason of being physically helpless; or 3. Who is less than eleven years old; or 4. Who is less than thirteen years old and the actor is eighteen years old or more. Rape in the first degree is a class B felony. I found this looking for federal laws, but I'm unsure if it's p…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/23 03:43 AM
-1

Because being gay is not against the law?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/23 03:21 AM
0

IANAL, but the best I can tell, it's minimum five years and maximum twenty five. This looks like twenty years, with the average being about seventeen and a half years.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/23 03:19 AM
3

That is true. Many countries need to fix their student loan system. I advocate starting by setting current loans to a fixed 1% interest. For new government loans, I think that the student's major should be dependent on the loan. Only help those who's schooling would help the nation, and require them to spend a fixed minimum in that service. For instance, if one received a loan to become a lawyer, they should then be required to serve five years as a public defender, or until their debt was paid …
/r/MensRights05/03/23 03:50 PM
5

I'm from Europe. If I'll fly as fast as I can to US and take a debt in bank y'all will pay for it too? I'm on my way! Just to be clear, the article is about Australia, not the US.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 12:38 PM
2

Why do you expect this subreddit to know? I wouldn't be surprised if their staff frequents several forums, but if you want to join their staff, you need to ask them, not us.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 03:16 AM
1

To clarify, IANAL, these are my thoughtss alone. If there is an established relationship, married or unmarried, the parentage is assumed. If either party wants to assume otherwise, it is on them to prove it. A mother may opt out of naming the father, yes. But by doing so she also opts out of all the associated benefits. I'm not seeing where due process is missing here. If there is a challenge, the only options avaidable to the opposing parent are to get volunteer compliance or ask a judge for a …
/r/MensRights25/02/23 09:42 PM
1

You don't need the fathers? Then what is the problem?
/r/MensRights25/02/23 09:18 PM
1

This talks about the criminal side of the concept of "chain of custody", however civil aspects are similar. IANAL, bet I would think the reasoning against at-home kits is explained at that link.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 12:03 AM
1

The parent has a right to refuse to volunteerly provide their genetic information. If they do, the only option is a court order compelling compliance.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 11:57 PM
2

The law does not create a bastard, the child is assumed to be legitimate. If a parent, assumed or otherwise wants to challenge that, then they need to bring tort.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 11:53 PM
1

France is a state.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 11:45 PM
-29

Privacy is not a right?
/r/MensRights24/02/23 08:14 AM
-38

Because there is a right of privacy. It's not a perfect world, but rights are for everybody.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 06:38 AM
1

The date rape scare dates back at least to the 1980s. That was one of the issues that got me interested in law, politics, and the MRM.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 07:43 AM
1

It's a suburb of St. George.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/22 09:04 AM
0

That may be true. But the state should not be the one to kill them. Let the victim or next of kin do it, or else grant clemency.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/22 09:03 AM
5

The father isn't allowed the choice to raise his child.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 09:04 PM
0

My thought is I have no idea who they are, but 21>18, so why should I care?
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:23 PM
1

Didn't look hard, did you? Name Years Chamoy Thipyaso 141076 Ines del Rio Prada 3828 Juana Barraza 759 Theresa Halsa 220 Diana Franklin 190 Cristina Soledad Sánchez Esquivel 130 Heidi Marie Littlefield 115
/r/PussyPassDenied14/10/22 07:52 AM
4

TIL I'm Black
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/22 11:14 AM
3

[B]oarder patrol. The rent police?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/22 05:32 AM
1

Which is what I said. The question was about rights, not opportunity.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 03:15 AM
1

Are you saying a woman can be a father?
/r/MensRights07/07/22 12:01 AM
-1

Men have the right of fatherhood.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:56 AM
2

"You ran it AFTER a court of law found the statements false and defaming. You just handed Depp a win if he decides to sue us for defamation." You have it backward. They ran the article, Depp sued, and Heard lost.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 09:38 AM
1

Right. Normally the sex of each party is (should be) irrelevant. It is relevant in this case because it draws attention to the fact that abuse is sexless.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 08:39 PM
3

As a public employee she should have better cognition of the situation. They're usually held to a higher standard, if I'm not wrong. Uh... Have you paid any attention to the last dozen or so presidents?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/22 05:23 PM
3

Do you have any idea how expensive it is to defend yourself in court? If you're lucky, you can keep it under $100000. The best way to win a gunfight is to be somewhere else. The best way to win a court trial is not to be at the event that necessitated a trial.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/22 05:21 PM
7

She attacked him with a deadly weapon. I don't think he should have followed her to her home, but the resolution should have included criminal penalties. As a librarian, she's likely a public employee, and a conviction may require loss of her job. Moot point since she choose to quit, but...
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/22 05:00 PM
1

This man?
/r/MensRights17/04/22 04:41 AM
1

This happens in all first, and probably second world countries. it is not unique to the USA. Also, a "dude" is a male who can't ride a horse, possibly effeminate, who pays for the luxury of working in an antique manner. Do you really expect them to stand up to anything?
/r/MensRights24/02/22 05:52 PM
2

it's long been that way in America, and from one point of view, it should be. "Marriage does not create a bastard.". We mustn't forget the child is a victim here.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 05:44 PM
7

Wow. Anti-Semite much?
/r/MensRights29/11/21 08:33 AM
1

Note there may not be such a law. But it would be logical for such a law to exist.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 01:48 PM
2

I'm not sure, but I suspect it is because there is a law against holding her at juvie past her 21st birthday.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 12:01 PM
6

The content on Tapworthy Happenings expresses a personal opinion, advocates a point of view (e.g., on a social or political issue), or is self-promotional. For the purpose of fact-checking, it should be treated as such. Here, and here are two stories from mainstream news that do not use clickbait titles. Considering this story is seven years old, both women have served their sentences. I'm unsure on the second charge, but § 3-203 has a sentence of 10 years, and § 11-202, § 11-203, or § 11-208, a…
/r/MensRights06/11/21 11:58 AM
1

What does the 19th have to do with this case?
/r/MensRights18/07/21 07:55 AM
2

Did you read the decision?
/r/MensRights18/07/21 07:53 AM
1

There's a similar case in AZ. Also, IIRC, OH.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 07:52 AM
1

Actually he had to repay the state. I'm not sure which I find more appalling, the fact that the most she could get was 18 months, or that she served no time. At least by then adult female / minor male was statutory rape. Soucre I found said it was not until 2 years prior.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 07:50 AM
2

Car(s), savings, insurance, retirement ...
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/21 04:57 PM
6

Pretty sure he can recover it. Either directly, or from her estate.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/21 12:25 PM
5

Dunno, ask Epstein.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/21 12:23 PM
7

Four. It is most likely her plea included time served, and 'good behavior' reduction.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 02:50 PM
1

Um... English. Do you speak it? No idea what you said.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 02:55 AM
1

WTF do this have to do with France?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/21 01:35 PM
1

SCOTUS may address this issue.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 06:51 PM
1

Stumbled upon this lady just after election day here in the US. Quoting her: November 19th is International Men's Day; a day to celebrate all the great men out there, and all the great things they do. Needless to say, feminists have never been fond of International Men's Day. However, it seems feminists are now trying to steal the day, and subvert it to push their own agenda. Will they manage to do it, or will enough good people see through it?
/r/MensRights20/11/20 03:35 AM
2

Try duckduckgo. Also yes/no questions are bad unless you want a yes/no answer.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 10:30 AM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights19/09/20 07:04 AM
1

Huh? Are you suggesting big penis = criminal? By that logic no penis = innocent.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 07:01 AM
1

Relevant.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 03:54 AM
1

You did see the part about how they were indicted by a grand jury, right?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/20 10:30 AM
2

§ 1304 Hate crimes; class A misdemeanor, class G felony, class F felony, class E felony, class D felony, class C felony, class B felony, class A felony. (a) Any person who commits, or attempts to commit, any crime as defined by the laws of this State, and who intentionally: (1) Commits said crime for the purpose of interfering with the victim’s free exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege or immunity protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, or commits said crime …
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/20 10:20 AM
1

I am a traditionalist. Absent a preexisting agreement otherwise, the man should pay. That does not preclude the woman from paying some or all. For instance, she might choose to pay as a means to symbolize she does not wish to pursue a relationship. The important thing is the decision needs to be made beforehand.
/r/PussyPass15/08/20 05:20 AM
2

How would there be a difference?
/r/MensRights06/08/20 07:37 AM
10

I just spotted this on Facebook, quoting Cassie Jaye: Cassie Jaye July 12 at 9:44 PM · I’m at a loss for the right words, but I’ll do my best. One of my dearest friends and the most brilliant and good-hearted person to dedicate his life to justice for men and boys, Marc Angelucci, was murdered yesterday in front of his home in California. News reports say: “52-year-old Marc Angelucci was found non-responsive and suffering from gunshot wounds. He was pronounced dead at the scene. A motive for the…
/r/MensRights14/07/20 08:04 AM
0

Roughly 50% of first marriages end in divorce[.] You hit one of my pet peeves, not understanding logic, statistics and math. The original 50% was determined by dividing the number of marriages in a year by divorces, but very few of those couples got married and divorce in the same year. The CDC data shows that in 2018 there was almost 2.75 (2.727) marriages that year for every divorce. Demographers say there was increased focus on divorce rates during the 1970s when the number of divorces rose, …
/r/MensRights09/07/20 07:10 AM
1

If I understand correctly, $400 Million is a one time thing, spousal support is monthly until it ends. If he's worth $800 Million, she may be entitled to half. One issue is what is he actually worth. Things like appraisal on house(s), savings, investments (IIRC, counted at 70%), taxable income, and so forth would determine all that.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 05:51 AM
1

If a spouse gave up a career or education to stay home and take care of household matters alimony for no more than 4 years and no more than what welfare would pay. My thought is it should last the length of the divorce, but be reduced by one part per year. So for instance if they were married four years, and it is set at $1000 a month, the second year it becomes $750, the third $500, the fourth $250, and then $0. On welfare, that is pretty broad area, can be worth tens of thousands per year. For…
/r/MensRights09/07/20 05:46 AM
0

Love?
/r/MensRights09/07/20 04:09 AM
1

If a man wants to marry a man, let him. Myself, I like women.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 04:07 AM
2

We both use them?
/r/MensRights28/03/20 05:58 AM
1

Ask on /r/askhistorians.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 09:59 AM
3

I won't get one, and wouldn't recommend it. But some would and do, so I am sharing information so people can decide for themselves. I take a Voltaire style view on things, believing it is better to let even things I disagree with be seen and discussed rather than hidden.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 06:44 AM
1

My primary objection is it may be irreversible.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 10:41 PM
6

Hot damn, I love my boobs.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/20 04:50 AM
5

I took a gender studies class...
/r/MensRights14/02/20 04:55 PM
2

Last month I was in line at the grocery store waiting to buy my bus pass, and noticed they had condoms behind lock and key. I commented to my friend how that was a bod thing. Yes, stealing is bad. But the benefits of stolen (and properly used) condoms far outweigh the damage done to society. Can you imagine some teenage PFK who's already nervous as can be asking someone (based on experience, a middle aged woman) for condoms? Nope. Instead H's going to go risk pregnancy and ether diseases. Or on …
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:44 AM
1

Someone knows Tim Pool's Reddit name, send him this. Or maybe Actual Justice Warrior. Only two that come to mind right now.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:23 AM
4

12 Angry Men is a great movie, one of my favorites. But in regards to juries, it is nowhere near realistic. See LE's review here.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 05:31 AM
3

It is a sobering experience to hold another persons future in your hands.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 04:53 AM
3

I doubt that, but do you have a source to prove me wrong?
/r/MensRights03/02/20 12:57 AM
0

Or... Here's an idea: pay the $126 (current 20200127-1439) for a share of PG, then attend stockholder meetings and gather a voting block to bring change to the company. Not better or worse than OP's suggestion, just another choice. Also, there's a word for adults without beards.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 10:42 PM
-3

Well, he is almost ninety. Maybe bring in fresh blood.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 09:17 PM
1

[T]he military probably won't enforce it[.] Considering that's illegal, I doubt they would.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 07:45 AM
1

Yeah, I'm a citizen, but not of Virginia. However we already have red flag laws here. It might help some people to use the soap and ballot boxes. Maybe even jury. I just hope we never need the fourth box.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 02:58 PM
12

This news blurb brings up how red flag laws can be weaponized against a spouse in a marriage, not unlike claims of abuse.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 07:36 AM
2

My first thought wan this was a quote and 'men' meant mankind. Similar to 'absolute power corrupts absolutely' But...
/r/MensRights22/01/20 09:58 PM
5

I'd like to add to the list two things: don't post 'Imagine if it was a women!' whines, and when posting a news story or legally related post, include the locale.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 09:58 PM
1

So who do they have playing Sean Connery?
/r/MensRights16/01/20 11:13 PM
14

I expect she's a college grad by now.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 07:19 PM
1

Are you actually asking us to do your homework?
/r/MensRights14/01/20 12:42 AM
3

So my grandmother shouldn't have accepted her $5 ring? Must be why he died after 73 years of marriage.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 07:44 PM
1

I'm not getting where you're getting revolution in that context from. From what I gather, the majority of those who identify as "Republican" aren't the ones initiating violence. I could see an argument that we are in the middle of a Progressive revolution, but despite a largely vocal faction of Democrats are progressive, I wouldn't call it a Democratic revolution. Unless I'm being sarcastic, like 'the people's Democratic republic '
/r/MensRights22/12/19 07:55 PM
1

Well, the Republicans lost, Spain (AFAIK) became the longest lasting fascist regime in history. It's sometimes called the "dress rehearsal for WWII", and from it came at least four presidents, including one Democrat. On mobile, so can't easily research, but I think it had more influence on the politics of the 1960s than today. I suggest asking in /r/askhistorians.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 04:59 PM
10

You could ask this in r/legaladvice, but I can tell you what they'd say: you need to talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 05:43 AM
1

If a man calls a man attractive, I'd think he's gay before I'd think he's unloyal.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 11:40 AM
1

If I mathed right, the total ratio is 133:134. The average is 3.02:3.04. Note I got average by grepping "how many countries in Europe", so number of countries may differ from map. Regardless, it is essentially equal, but the average for women is slightly higher. One thing of concern is highest for men is 8, but two countries have '9' in the female slot.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 11:08 AM
1

Too complex for you to understand?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 04:50 AM
1

Its made on Purpose to shame IMD No, it isn't. From Wikipedia: Jack Sim is the founder of the World Toilet Organization, the BoP HUB and is a global advocate for sanitation. Formerly in the construction industry, he founded WTO in 2001 after attaining financial independence at age of 40 and deciding to devote the rest of his life to social work. For ‘creating good will and bringing the subject into the open’ and ‘mobilizing national support in providing on-the-ground expertise’ Jack Sim received…
/r/MensRights11/12/19 04:09 AM
2

It's older than that. I gave my sister a shirt with that as a joke back in the 80's.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 03:48 AM
3

Not likely anywhere in the US.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 09:35 AM
2

Drive, mail and voice. Oh, and maps. If there was a viable alternative to voice, I'd seriously consider dropping it.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 01:12 PM
1

To be honest, I'm more aware of women's vs men's day, but that's because it's my little brothers and cousins birthdays, so other events of note on the same day are easily remembered.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 06:50 PM
1

It is a personal rule. I mention it only so you do not think you have won by argumentum ad nauseam. Your way out of the dilemma you find yourself in is pretending that taking responsibility in the case of the mother includes abortion. This is, of course, ridiculous. "Argument from incredulity" and "ignoratio elenchi" possibly also "red herring" This is twisting my words. I have said that it is ultimately her choice to decide to have an abortion, and that if she so chooses, then she must accept r…
/r/MensRights14/11/19 08:11 AM
1

Is it? My point, from the start, was that IF abortion is legal then obviously the father must have some kind of say. If he doesn't have any influence on whether or not the child will be born, then obviously he can't be made responsible. This is what you wrote: IF women have the right to unilateral legal abortion, then they have no right to bring to term a pregnancy that the father doesn't agree to. If they do so anyway, they should be held responsible for the child and provide it with everything…
/r/MensRights12/11/19 04:34 AM
1

The DNA of the mothers body is unique. So is the DNA of the body of the unborn child. It is a mixture of the DNA of mother and father, hence, logically, it isn't the mothers body, but another body that she through her actions invited into hers. First, I am assuming we're still discussing consensual sex. Or do you believe a woman can't get pregnant from rape? It is the body of the most vulnerable human being imaginable. The problem here is that hasn't been proven scientifically. Until it is, from…
/r/MensRights10/11/19 11:17 PM
1

In that case you are against abortion, right? Just exchange 'father' with 'mother'. Or do you think women are NOT adults? I said I am against them already. I also believe in the right of an individual to control their body. If an individual (adult) has sex, there are risks and benefits. Each must accept that. There is a legal term, "jointly and severally". I see parentage as such. By default, each parent is equally responsible, and each parent is totally responsible. It normally takes a death or…
/r/MensRights10/11/19 06:02 AM
1

We aren't even talking about T3 or the other abominations.... Hey! Anything with River Tam in it is not an abomination.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 04:23 AM
2

It's probably closer to a 1:1 ratio. "Exceptional" is a subjective term.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 04:21 AM
1

I'll have to look it up. I'm only aware of her because the connection to CDMA.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 04:19 AM
3

Just an opinion, but it has always seemed to me in the series whicle John may have been the primary point of interest, She is the primary point of view. We are seeing things through her eyes, and everyone views themself as important.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 10:35 AM
0

[I]t also plagiarizes its predecessors? How so? As I understand it's a fork of T2, both of which were written by the same person.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 10:28 AM
2

Yeah. Lets start with Marie Curie. The woman who invented the word "radioactivity" Then there's Heady Lammar: During World War II, Lamarr learned that radio-controlled torpedoes, an emerging technology in naval war, could easily be jammed and set off course. She thought of creating a frequency-hopping signal that could not be tracked or jammed. She contacted her friend, composer and pianist George Antheil, to help her develop a device for doing that, and he succeeded by synchronizing a miniaturi…
/r/MensRights09/11/19 10:27 AM
1

As often as this is reposted, could we add it to the sidebar / wiki?
/r/MensRights09/11/19 09:00 AM
1

So you disagree that if a woman gets pregnant against the will of the father she should have to take complete responsibility for the resulting child? The bold part above is the issue. The moment the father willingly has sex, he agrees to be responsible for what happens. You can't roll back time and change your mind. You can't pick and choose which results you'll accept the consequences of. It's all or none. If you want to act like an adult, then you need to act like an adult. In the framework of…
/r/MensRights09/11/19 04:15 AM
1

Ok, I'm going to quote from the OP, and perhaps you will be able to see my comments are on point. [W]omen ... have no right ... that the father doesn't agree to. The OP argues the right of the mother to have a child or an abortion requires the fathers permission. They are essentially saying they own the woman who is carrying their child. If they do so anyway, they should be held responsible for the child and provide it with everything it needs. Yes, this is how it works in the real world. Each p…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 07:16 AM
0

That is not true.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 01:52 AM
1

Yes, that is on example of an injustice we need to make the world notice.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 01:45 AM
1

Do you own her body? If not, what right do you have to tell her what to do with her body? Forcing her to have an abortion, and preventing her having an abortion are two sides of the same coin. She is the one with the body affected by pregnancy. Your body is unaffected. Again, you can try to talk her into keeping it (or not), but the choice will always be hers. She is not your property. The child is neither parents property. Both parents by default share responsibility for raising the child, once…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 01:36 AM
3

Right. I was only responding to the idea that once a man has released his sperm willingly (not raped), it no longer belongs to him. I think. IANAL, and all that. Forcing a woman in the US to have an abortion because the father doesn't want it will never happen. It would violate the first, fourth and fifth amendments for sure. Possibly also the sixth, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendments also. I'm against abortion, but also strong for individual rights. She owns her body. You do not. You can argu…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 04:16 AM
2

When I was homeless I asked several times for a sign to be placed above the urinals that said: It's not as big as you think. Step closer. Also, now I want to learn how to hover piss.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 02:42 AM
3

I'm not at home, so can't easily look it up, but what comes to mind is 'right of first sale' doctrine. Basically once it has (willingly) left your body, you no longer own it, the receiver does.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 02:30 AM
5

Boobs aren't genitals. Otherwise it would also be illegal for men to be topless. Those women should have been breastfeeding. Even more laws protecting that.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 12:22 AM
19

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
/r/MensRights04/11/19 11:34 AM
-4

That's how we get lawyers. But seriously, it is possible to get pregnant that way.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 05:40 AM
1

Is this from The Red Pill? Looks familiar, and if so, should be pointed out the information is about five years out of date. Still mostly true, but some things have changed
/r/MensRights04/11/19 05:39 AM
1

If you had RTFA, you would have learned: This week, Mears was sentenced ... for the offense of sexual intercourse without consent (commonly known as rape, a word that is not used in Montana Code)[.] ... The court documents state that ... the imposed sentence is the maximum penalty allowed according to Montana law It's not rape legally. But they have a legal equivalent. Don't like it? Contact your state Senators and house representatives and ask them to change it.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 01:40 AM
6

Because she was convicted of sexual assault yesterday. For all crying about not being convicted of rape, Montana doesn't have a 'rape' law. She got the equivalent Max sentence.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 01:27 AM
1

This story is a year old, and has been reposted several times. She got twenty years for rape, but she still can appeal the decision.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 05:20 AM
1

My personal opinion is they should release a limited run, properly marked, then Sue her for the loss of expected income.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 09:35 PM
1

I gotta say that makes me uncomfortable. What's the difference between that and book burning? Instead of it being an example of wrongness, it's quietly swept under the rug.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 10:05 PM
-5

Right, my question is how "PD" is assumed by the prosecution to mean 'cop'? I mean, to me, 'a PD' I think 'Public Defender', but '{Pretty|Public} Dumbass' works too. I'm just not seeing a actual crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 08:42 PM
7

Can someone explain 'pulped'? I mean, the only reference I have is to classic sci-fi.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 07:44 PM
3

Where's the impersonation? And it regards to United States v. Alvarez, how is it a crime?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/19 06:46 PM
1

Xeon FTW!
/r/MensRights14/10/19 11:50 PM
2

I don't recall the case, other than I think I came across it in Readers Digest, sometime between 1985 and 1995, but there was a case at a school (U of MD?) where the local women's group took a group of photos of men out of the latest yearbook, and pasted them on posters with the words "These men may be rapists". Those men won their libel suit.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 11:49 PM
1

Keep the police non-emergency number with you. then if this happened again, you can call it, and forward it to them. You can honestly tell the woman you called for help on her behalf, without (much) danger to yourself.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 02:32 AM
2

That is irrelevant. Any battery should be treated as a criminal act. Regardless of who initiated an argument or violence, the law needs to treat all parties equally.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 12:41 AM
2

TIL North Carolina is in Canada.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 11:34 PM
13

Defense attorneys everywhere hate this one weird trick...
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/19 11:20 PM
8

I don't recall her exact words. She answered the person next to me, I briefly talked to her, then wished her well when I got off the bus. Based on my memory, it was closer to "not just women, men can also be victims" I wrote the title in a bit of a rush, as I wanted to finish it before i needed both hands to get off the bus. Is there a reason why you feel a need to automatically assume malice?
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:07 PM
13

"Not just women" assumes other adults. So logically, men.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 09:48 PM
15

She did.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 08:56 PM
13

Domestic violence.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 08:55 PM
1

I'm a rational anarchist.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 06:34 AM
1

[C]hild supoort has been to the SCOTUS and found and [I] quote...a scheme, in the best interest of state treasuries and not an entitlement. Cite, please. The program is for D.C. and the federal territories and not for the 50 states[.] Found the SovCit.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 04:13 PM
1

Ask on /r/legaladviceofftopic
/r/MensRights30/09/19 12:08 PM
1

My opinion is there should be a clear guideline detailing length and amount. For instance, alimony would be equal to marriage length, and be reduced by one part per year. So a couple married 15 years would pay the lower income spouse for 15 years, the first being 15/15th of the amount, the second 14/15th, and so forth until in the last year they are receiving 1/15th of the original amount. Certain item, such as retraining costs should be required to (at least partially) come from those funds als…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 12:07 PM
3

And be upfront about what you want. As long as it's not unreasonable or illegal, they should be able to work to find you one. (Speaking as an American) : It is reasonable to ask for a male therapist. It is not reasonable to insist the entire office staff be male. It is legal to ask for a male doctor. It is not legal to insist he be a native born white man.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 02:58 AM
2

I'm a longtime Lurker in RBN. My N was unrelated, but got advice and support. Believe me, the horror stories about some N's are incredible. Not 'she yells at me' level, but 'she killed my five year old because I filed for visitation' level. As one I remember could be summed up, you know it's bad when you have to draw a pistol in defense of a nephew against your own mother.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 02:50 AM
1

Wendy McElroy. She was my gateway drug to the MRM back in the 80's and 90's.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 04:00 AM
-1

He should have paid. Absent a pre-existing agreement to split the bill, It is traditional for the man to pay. She could have offered to split the bill, or even paid it in full before he paid with his card. The fact she did not implied the possibility of another date. However, a possibility in not a guarantee. The fact he did not ask for it to be split until after he was turned down shows it is not about equality, but retaliation. His actions instead indicated he thought he was either due more ti…
/r/MensRights26/09/19 03:53 AM
16

Yes. a video of the article.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 05:31 PM
3

Title does not reflect the article. Wrong link?
/r/MensRights24/09/19 05:38 PM
1

Poor puppers
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/19 02:37 AM
1

he's been an anti singe the 80's
/r/MensRights21/09/19 02:29 AM
1

Nope. I don't go out of my way to support anti-gun people.
/r/MensRights20/09/19 08:14 PM
1

Clear your cache.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 09:40 PM
1

When that happens I copy the text to an external application, then reload the page. If it didn't show, you can then hit reply and copy / paste.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 08:36 PM
2

Why have you posted this nineteen times?
/r/MensRights17/09/19 12:41 AM
1

You mean like a parent to work, and one to care for the kids?
/r/MensRights06/09/19 11:18 PM
1

It's fake news.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 01:29 AM
1

Google tailors results to you. Try again with duckduckgo
/r/MensRights04/09/19 01:28 AM
2

How so? I have seven close friends with postgraduate math degrees, of which four are women. None of them have ever indicated any reason gender should matter. Math doesn't require physical strength or endurance. So why are men a better choice biologically?
/r/MensRights04/09/19 01:26 AM
1

If you get raped by a woman and she gets pregnant, you're 100% responsible for the baby! ~ This dumbass Several US courts FTFY
/r/MensRights30/08/19 01:58 AM
1

OP, edit your post with link to post you refer to. Context is lacking.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:02 AM
1

This guy.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/19 01:43 AM
1

Were those rights only given to members of the militia? I've haven't looked, but don't believe there is language there of that kind. The original text implied the militia requirement. From what I recall, there were issues surrounding land ownership and poll taxes. Even all men weren't given the right to vote. That didn't happen until later. Yes, it is an imperfect document. Fortunately, the means of correction were included. Let's assume for a moment that you're correct. The right to vote was ti…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 03:15 AM
1

Privileges are 'earned'. Rights are something you are born with. Regardless of what the local government says, every person who ever has, or ever will, live has those rights. Don't matter if they are American or Zimbabwean. "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal[.]" And before you say anything, 'men' is a synonym for 'mankind'. By your logic, because women can't be conscripted, they also don't have the right to a jury, and can be subject to being tried many time…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 12:44 AM
3

There's a word for adults without beards.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 09:04 PM
1

Look at stats for "premature" first babies. As RAH once said, an eager bride can do in seven months what takes a cow or countess nine.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 03:19 AM
3

Uh... In the 80's the 'date rape' scare did the same thing. I only remember because it was part of what got me interested in politics.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 10:29 PM
1

You might want to join the Youtubers Union.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 10:26 PM
1

[A] story about the Athenahealth survey[.] https://www.wbur.org/commonhealth/2017/09/08/patient-doctor-female-male-bail Before I get into this, I'll point out my problems with this survey: It's short (six months), and done internally by a single company. In a lot of ways, it has the same issues as the infamous "1 in 5" study. "[M]en with commercial insurance were quite a bit less likely to return to a new female doctor than a male one. " The issue here is the word new. If you and your doctor are…
/r/MensRights25/07/19 04:11 AM
1

[M]en prefer male doctors, women prefer female doctors in at least some circumstances, so what's the big deal? I'm not disagreeing here, but do you have a citation for that claim? I found one company wide survey, but nothing from an independent party. One thing I find interesting is from what I've seen it's about 50/50 on women choosing male vs female gynecologists. Women who choose men seem to believe they are more gentle.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 10:27 PM
1

My "choose for yourself" was the firm part. But, unsurprisingly, just like previous times female doctors are discussed, my opinion has been downvoted. I do worry about the mob mentality is all the "-ism" subs, including this one.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 05:07 PM
0

Right. The years long relationship I have with my doctor should be tossed away to make you feel better.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:44 AM
1

I'm not familiar with the comics, could they be casting Her as Þrúðr? I could see the confusion, since her father would be Þórr. What I want to see them do (if they do cast a female Þórr), is then cast a female Jesus.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:33 AM
1

Paging Bad Title Bot! even if I remembered my headphones, I'd need a damn good reason to click a link that says "hip-hop"
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:24 AM
-1

No. Ask for what makes you comfortable. I found a doctor I liked enough that even after I moved I'm willing to travel to the neighboring county to visit. In my case I feel, both personally and religiously that 'health care' is 'woman's work. Those are my opinions, and I neither expect other to agree, nor am upset when they disagree. If my doctor sends me to a male specialist, I don't complain. I do think I would have a problem with switching to a male therapist, largely because I have such a goo…
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:17 AM
1

Source
/r/MensRights21/07/19 08:48 PM
2

That's where you say "officer, I'd like to introduce you to my children ..."
/r/MensRights21/07/19 08:43 PM
16

What kind of a world is this that the cat wasn't noticed first?
/r/MensRights21/07/19 08:38 PM
2

Right, what he did was trespass. He might have a legitimate necessity defense, if he can show he had no other safe place to go. Also helpful would be if he exited once police arrived, and left area as soon as possible. Standard disclaimer: IANAL
/r/MensRights21/07/19 08:32 PM
3

People afraid of mobile phones?
/r/MensRights20/07/19 08:16 AM
-4

I could have sworn this sub was named mensrights, not againstfeminists. Squabbling like little children, looking for ways we are different doesn't help. All it does is show the mainstream public we can be ignored. OP, you want to change the direction of men's rights, then don't run to a new hiding spot. Stay and get involved. If you think there is a problem, then work to fix it.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 08:43 AM
1

The case appeal is ongoing. until it's complete, the victory or defeat outcome is in limbo.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 01:44 AM
1

You stated they were not held in contempt. The article says otherwise. Also, at this point it is neither a victory or defeat.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 12:36 AM
1

Did you RTFA? "Occasionally something happens that is truly surprising. In this case, the University of California-Santa Barbara was held in contempt of court last week for transparently ignoring a ruling that required it to reconsider its finding that a male student stalked a female student."
/r/MensRights12/07/19 12:02 AM
2

I mentioned file sharing not as a means for a/v chatting, but to point out the underlying requirements are already in place. I think xmpp is a good choice. Open, decentralized, very popular (Facebook and Google both use it for IM services, or about 5G user accounts), can do text, video, voice, fire sharing, and logs. Multiple clients for just about every platform.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 11:44 PM
1

2X has 12 million more users than this sub. Does that mean feminism is better than men's rights? PRC has over a billion citizens. Vatican City, I doubt over 10000, probably closer to 1000. Do those numbers make China a better country? Number of users don't matter if the product is flawed.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 11:35 PM
2

Discord requires windows or OS X. Their web page says it wont work on Linux. So I can't suggest anything via discord. IRC can keep logs, and also share files, so A/V chats should work. It's also closed source. How can we know it's secure if we can't see it?
/r/MensRights11/07/19 06:34 AM
1

https://www.thecollegefix.com/a-judge-ordered-it-to-reconsider-its-title-ix-ruling-the-university-copied-and-pasted-the-old-ruling/
/r/MensRights11/07/19 06:20 AM
1

I don't know. I don't pay much attention to names and places. My concern is with equality of justice, which in a large part means due process. If a fair and impartial trial determines either a man or a woman is guilty, they should be given appropriate punishment. When I say it hurts everyone, what I bean is it takes resources from society that could be used in other, better, ways. It also causes societal attitudes to move in a harmful way. A false accusation is just as likely to hurt it's intend…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 06:16 AM
2

Discord website says it doesn't run on Linux. It's also closed source. Why / how is it better than IRC?
/r/MensRights11/07/19 12:56 AM
1

So they are in contempt of court? A day in jail is usually sufficient, not sure if a judge can also issue fines for contempt. But if so.... I'd do $1G per day they don't comply.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 12:46 AM
1

False accusations hurt everyone.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 12:43 AM
2

Also from ifeminists / Wendy McElroy. Note that Barrett is rumored to be Trump's pick to replace RBG.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 10:48 PM
2

Via ifeminists / Wendy McElroy.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 10:42 PM
1

I'm not sure about redpill. I understand it comes from a movie, but when I grep imdb for titles, I find this, but it gives no data on what it's about. Incels are not automatically bad, I think misguided is better.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 11:40 PM
1

In a nutshell, mgtow talks lot about women and there is alot of women hate. mensrights talks more about feminism as a government institution that is being built against men and masculine culture etc. Not really about women as a gender. I've heard it described as such: Redpill: we hate women. MGTOW: we don't need women. MRA: we're equal to women. Incel: we cock block ourselves.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 09:13 AM
3

Which is just a roundabout way of saying most combatants are not women and children, e.g. men.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 09:06 AM
1

How again is math masculine or feminine? Of all my friends with advanced math degrees (masters or doctorates) it's slightly biased towards women, but essentially equal. I've never heard any of them even hint sex in math matters, they just want to get more people interested in math.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 11:41 PM
1

Ok, so I didn't RTFA, and doubt this is the case, but I can think of one area where a woman could falsely accuse someone of rape: if they have Coprolalia. However, most people with Coprolalia are extremely embarrassed by it, and don't actively pursue their statements. Unfortunately most people without think Coprolalia is the only type of tic disorder, and that it's a big joke.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 11:29 PM
3

Right. Forget helping our intimate partners.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 11:54 PM
2

How to.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 11:02 PM
2

One issue I've seen is there seems to be no clearly defined demarcation between the waves. As an American, I define them as such: 1919 and prior. Dealt with right to own property and vote. Ended with the passage of the 19th amendment. 1919 through early 1980's. Dealt with ownership of self. Birth control, abortion, privacy, right to associate, and many other civil rights recognized. Closed with Casey v Planned Parenthood. Early 80's through Present. The women first movement. Here women have prog…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 10:48 PM
1

This is one of the legit claims of inequality women have.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 03:51 PM
3

None of those men were subject to being tortured, or hung. None of them had to worry about how their families would be tortured if they were caught. I also tend to object to calling it a sacrifice, considering 67% of the WWII military was drafted, and the Army got most of them. In short, most of those men never had a choice. I'm all for uplifting the actions of men (even if forced), but this seems to be 'women weren't allowed in combat, therefore they obviously should be actively excluded from D…
/r/MensRights08/06/19 06:33 PM
2

11 years to the day of my father's death.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 04:08 PM
1

@SecAza is a typo and should be @SecAzar. He is HHS secretary. Shouldn't that be [email protected], or similar? Child support agencies are federal contractors and receive most of their money from the federal government. See the FAQ: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/faq#wiki_13._is_there_evidence_of_sexism_and_corruption_in_the_child_support_and_parenting_time_bureaucracies_in_the_united_states_.28title_iv-d.29.3F No, they are not. Your own link states: The United States Department of Healt…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 05:50 AM
12

I'm a belt and suspenders guy. Condom and pill, condom and foam, condom and IUD, etc. I saw recently (perhaps this subreddit) that most people misuse condoms, resulting in around 90% effectiveness, and of course "nothing" is 100% effective, but two highly effective methods are statistically unlikely to fail together.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 02:54 AM
1

I'm confused. You're suggesting people look at four items, but between punctuation and acronyms, I can only figure out one (is there a fake Trump I need to worry about?) What are the other three? Secaza appears to be a defunct Florida business. HHSOCR appears to be the office of civil rights forHealth and Human services. The article is unclear, but this appears not to be a federal matter. Or are you suggesting HHS conspired with the man to jump? Finally, OIGatHHS also appears to be a part of HHS…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 02:48 AM
2

Sorry, but this is 'begging the question', and of 'limited scope'. First, while Neptune was a dramatic part of Overlord, it was only one part. The French resistance (per Wikipedia) was 10-15% female, and they conducted several sabotage operations on ar immediately before the Normandy invasion. While storming the beaches was no 'walk in the park', I would argue that the 10-15% of women (and the 85-90% of men) in the resistance had it much harder than the men who were in the boats. The latter at w…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 02:03 AM
2

Thanks. Interesting, but I'd like to see a broader study in the future. It did reinforce the statement 'blue balls' can kill. Of course, some methods of release are more ethical than others. Also, wrong word. Meant 'paywalled'.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 04:19 PM
1

Firewalled. Archive it or similar please.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 11:15 AM
5

I'm confused. Slide into Dungeon Master? Is that some sexual euphemism?
/r/MensRights04/06/19 02:57 PM
-1

I see a lot on here deriding women for bagspreading, my point was it isn't limited to women.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 02:49 PM
1

That's a guy blocking the isle. The wheelchair had to come in backwards, and the stroller to my left had to enter via the rear door. When I got off, the driver had to help me through the rear door. Rules say you can't block the isle. Among other things, it's a fire hazzard.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 12:53 PM
2

I worship many Gods and Goddesses, including my patron. If I was to kneel in front of any the best I could hope for is to be ignored. As to gifts, that requires a return. What better way to piss off a God than to constantly bug them.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 01:53 AM
1

Really? Where I'm from 'dude' is a mild insult. They dress funny and can't ride a horse.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 12:57 AM
2

Here in the PNW I start looking for a walk in refrigerator once it crosses 15
/r/MensRights31/05/19 01:22 PM
1

Context? The background makes me think 'boxing ring'.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 09:12 AM
1

My grandmother's ring was $5. They stayed married until his death.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 09:42 PM
1

When something is thirty years old, it probably has been posted. Always search first!
/r/MensRights26/05/19 10:37 PM
-1

Sarcasm doesn't work with you, does it? STFW
/r/MensRights26/05/19 07:30 PM
-1

Wow, has it been a week since this was reposted already? How time does fly!
/r/MensRights26/05/19 03:30 PM
1

Part of the problem with that argument is it ignores the fact that at the minimum we don't have "a rape law", but at least fifty one. The federal law, at 18 U.S. Code § 2241 says: (a)By Force or Threat.—Whoever [...] (1) by using force against that other person; or (2) by threatening or placing that other person in fear that any person will be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping; or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any term of years or life,…
/r/MensRights21/05/19 08:15 AM
1

The FBI definition is not the law.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 03:52 AM
28

The way it reads this was a private endeavour. Sort of like the teacher who buys boys ties and jackets and teaches them how gentlemen act.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 11:35 PM
12

All too often these crimes are reported using words like "relationship", or "had sex with" and similar. It is encouraging to see a news story using the proper word for what is a disgusting crime, no matter the victim or perpetrator. I didn't see a comment section, so I called their office and complimented them on using the proper word. I'd encourage when such things happen, we politely express compliments to further encourage balanced and equal reporting.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 07:15 PM
1

I take the Seattle to Tacoma train maybe 4 times a year, and it's not bad. rather enjoy it. I can bend my leg if I remove the brace, but can't stand on it without the brace, and have to have room to extend it to re-apply brace. I plan to buy a recumbent trike, which will both dramatically decrease my dependence on public transit, and (albeit slower), decrease my waistline.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 04:25 AM
3

That's nice. For medical reasons, after talking with my doctor, I stopped driving.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 04:10 AM
3

It's not manslaughter, it's murder one. She told him, he went looking for the Guy. That's premeditation.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 01:20 AM
2

Negotiating Rights Away.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 12:26 AM
9

Well, five out of every four people have trouble with fractions.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 10:23 AM
0

Parents can make medical decisions[,] for [they are] children. I added a comma in the most logical place, and expanded your contraction, but still do not understand. Parents are children? Well, yes, everyone is somebody's child. Body modifications is absolutely not illegal. without info to back it up, I'd guess ear piercing to be the most common. Probably 90+% of women of all ages are pierced, and in men it's become more common then it was when I was young. Bariatric surgery and liposuction are …
/r/MensRights08/05/19 06:17 AM
0

Medical Associations out way religion. English isn't your native tongue, is it? Just because someone makes an argument does not make them correct. It comes down to the question, who owns you?. Parent's hold their children's life and wellbeing in trust, especially at such a young age. Education and free discourse is always the answer, never coercion.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 05:39 AM
1

There is always more than one side. And what of those Jews and Muslims? Who should decide how children should be raised, their parents, or someone else?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 03:37 AM
0

No, just that it's something I don't have to worry about. TBH, I'm not sure on the circumcision issue, I see issues on both sides, and that's if you leave religion and culture out of it. Best I myself can morally do at this point is support both sides being able to articulate their views in a peaceful manner.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 03:20 AM
1

why what? Why did I learn something new? Because I asked. Or why am I not a Christian? Because I choose the worship the Gods and Goddesses of my ancestors.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:14 AM
29

Or maybe where they enslave soup?
/r/MensRights07/05/19 01:17 AM
12

This got me curious, since I'm sitting in the taco bell by TCC. I asked the manager, and she said neither bathroom has a table, but if you need to change your baby you can use a table by the bathrooms.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 11:09 PM
0

Well, I learned something new. Thank the Gods I'm not a Christian.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 09:46 PM
1

So a popularity contest. not great, but at least not a legal case
/r/MensRights04/05/19 05:07 AM
1

Uh, cite?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:55 AM
1

Wait, I'm confused. What did she win? a legal case? one of those televised popularity contests? what?
/r/MensRights03/05/19 03:06 AM
1

Thin in a very bad example. No where is the location defined. For all one knows, it could be the internal policy of a private company. Regardless, I'm pretty sure it's not US.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 02:27 AM
3

It is also important to point out the FBI definition is not law. They neither make nor decide the law. The definition is how they categorize rape. Here is the federal definition of rape.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 02:18 AM
0

Nope. Nowhere does it say 'penetrator' cannot be the victim.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 01:23 AM
1

Thor is a red-head, and has a full beard. What you mean is Hemsworth pretends he's a God, but he probably doesn't even own a goat.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 10:07 PM
2

Hate to burst your bubble, but that ain't Thor.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 09:31 AM
2

I'm a Skaðiman myself, and a modernist. I prefer to play beard-sissors-10mm
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:57 AM
1

I get this post.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 09:33 PM
3

Almost always. Sometimes you get rude one's like you did, but they aren't worth the effort to remember very long. Maybe i'll discuss it with my therapist, if it happened that morning. And we have nothing else to talk about.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 01:40 AM
1

Well, me too, but that's not what it says.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 05:03 PM
0

Where does it say that?
/r/MensRights23/03/19 02:13 PM
1

"Samantha Ray Mears, 19, ... broke into her ex of seven years’ house Friday while he was away. " Am i the only one who's bothered that he's been her ex for seven years? They broke up when she was twelve?
/r/MensRights23/03/19 08:47 AM
1

The revised UCR definition of rape is: Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim. Looks to me like the FBI already defines it as such. If you don't consent, you're a victim.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 08:40 AM
3

Geez, what are you guys, Mormon bishops?
/r/MensRights22/03/19 01:32 AM
2

Until I see a verifiable source, I'm assuming this is complete fabrication.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:53 PM
4

IANAL, but the law looks vauge to me. Appears to be directed against "strip clubs" Incidentally, the law seems not only to possibly violate the 4th,s ban on unwarranted searches, but the law makes it illegal to verify state also.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 09:40 PM
2

source?
/r/MensRights20/02/18 10:00 AM
2

Ok, first off, I've been homeless. Recently. In fact, if you stretch the definition a very small amount, i still am. Ironically if I win my (now twelve year) fight for my disability this coming spring and get SSI, i'll no longer qualify for low in come housing, and my rent will ump to 105% or so of max possible pay... In general, I don't give money. The one exception was the street musician who knew the song when I told him to "play me some fiddle!". However, I'll try to be helpful, give socks, …
/r/MensRights14/12/17 10:07 AM
1

Can't be an Attack helicopter without the "woosh" thing.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 05:13 PM
1

might want to check your laws on gender equality.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 02:13 AM
1

Do you have the "woosh" thing? if not, you can't be an attack helicopter.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 02:04 AM
1

Don't know where that sign is located, but If it's in Washington, I can ignore it
/r/MensRights02/10/17 01:59 AM
1

Can't edit. Weird Anyhoo... 5 -9. 4 is fucked
/r/MensRights12/02/17 04:56 AM
1

Well, 4 - 9 would eventually be true.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 04:55 AM
1

HaveYouQuitBeatingYourWifeYet? The poblem is the white ribbon thing is that it presumes men will be violent against women unless society forces them to take action, such as voluntary self shaming.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 02:27 AM
2

Thank you. this was the type of answer I was looking for. I'll follow those links in a bit, but just FYI, you need to edit the 'www' in links to 'np', per (sub)reddit rules.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 09:41 PM
1

I can agree, but my point was that one gender is effectively ignored by society, not medicine. As to the video, i did a quick search, but didn't find an answer. What percentage of lung cancer advertisements are geared towards men vs women? This issue goes back to what I talked about in original post, how at one time society considered heart disease to be a male disease, so no one was talking to women about heart attacks. tl;dr: it's not who's affected most, but who's affected in minuscule amount…
/r/MensRights29/09/16 09:38 PM
1

Almost, yes. But almost only counts in horseshoes, hand grenades, and nuclear weapons. I would say the opposite of prostate cancer to be cervical cancer. My point was that some diseases claim mostly one number or another, such as breast cancer. And I couldn't think of any off top of my head.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 09:26 PM
3

we talk everything from religion, politics (in general), medical, my plans to build my house... if i felt i couldn't talk openly with my shrink, i'd get another one.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 11:06 PM
2

A), I'm an aspie, so, yes. B), why shouldn't I?
/r/MensRights28/09/16 11:03 PM
2

Blunt objects are even more common. Ban those.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:17 PM
1

I do see in the FB comments that someone asked about men with RO's, and they replied "next time". Since this class seems rushed, and small (14 peeps), i'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, and judge by if they invite both men and women, or women only, at the next class.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 07:43 AM
1

Black fathers.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 01:50 AM
2

Ask on /r/legaladvice.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 07:07 AM
12

This is the kind of case the ACLU and ILJ love to take pro bono.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 10:17 PM
2

My point is the whole issue is hypocritical. I have been accused of manspreading, I've even been forced to give up my seat. But as a disabled man, I've never seen a (visually) healthy woman treated the same way.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 11:42 PM
1

This person's phone died, and they were only just able to upload accompanying [ http://imgur.com/wsltY7C](photo). That's a POV pic of me, with a cane and leg brace.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 11:38 PM
40

I see a handicapped sign on both. .gov says I'm handicapped. Looks like I can use either.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 12:48 AM
7

There's to trigger warning. Really needs one. Trigger: Idiot with microphone.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 02:30 AM
1

I'm not saying it was ok. I'm saying two wrongs don't make a right. Forcing people to do things is wrong. No matter the reason. You're trying to paint me as a racist. I'm not. I am however someone who believes in individual rights and responsibilities. I am only responsible for my own actions. it is not my responsibility to provide for others. I can choose to, but morally it must be my choice. OP asked if anyone had experienced discrimination with their doctor. I replied back mine respected my r…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 09:50 PM
1

I'm an Asatruer. I don't think they are Goddesses. Only that my religion influences my choice. It matters because I feel more comfortable with a lady doctor. If you feel more comfortable seeing a man, then you should. Just don't force your choice on me. I don't force mine on you.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:11 PM
1

What you're doing is not really different from an old lady refusing treatment unless she can see a white doctor, because she doesn't trust non-whites. No. Please show me where I've said I won't accept treatment from a male doctor. I have said I want a lady for my GP. She sends me to specialists. I don't refuse who she sends me to. For individual consumers, I agree. For employers and businesses, it should not be legal. It would set up a tyranny of the majority type of situation, where as long as …
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:51 PM
0

I can understand how it can be misconstrued as sexist. Simple fact is the three Goddesses of my Pantheon that deal with health issues are, well, Goddesses. That doesn't mean I only worship Goddesses. Yesterday was a Gods day, today is for a Goddess. Only two days out of six are for Goddesses. I think discrimination is wrong. I also think it should be legal. Forcing someone to do something right is just as wrong as a person refusing to do the right thing. However, if a person chooses to discrimin…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:37 AM
0

I don't see a parallel. I feel more comfortable with women doctors, but only insist my GP is a lady. I don't refuse when she sends me to a male specialist. This is a decision I make about me. What others decide is their choice. If I had a doctor that cared about skin color, I would get a new doctor. If someone wants only a white doctor, fine. But they'll have to accept the consequences of that choice. It would be unreasonable to say all whites must be treated by whites, or no men can treat women…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:10 AM
0

Nope. 100% male. Yeah, I offer to ask for a different doctor if they don't like my conditions. Only one has ever taken me up on that offer. Someone apparently doesn't like my choice in doctors.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:46 AM
-7

I've actually experienced the opposite. I prefer lady doctors. I am reasonable, and only insist my GP is a lady, but when I get a new doctor, I always lay out my rules: For personal and religious reasons, I feel more comfortable with a woman doctor. My big sister is a mustang MSN working on her ARNP degree. If there's a conflict, I'll take her advice. My doc in Oregon was best ever. She set the standard, and all doctors are judged against her. I like my doc near my age, so I don't have to worry …
/r/MensRights12/06/15 02:16 AM
13

NotTheOnion
/r/MensRights10/06/15 07:11 PM
1

You do understand what an Non Participation back link is, right?
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:47 PM
2

You'd be surprised what a contempt of court order will do. And from the looks of that thread, the ex will have supervised visits at best once everything is worked out
/r/MensRights01/06/15 06:06 AM
2

In my opinion, the poster should get custody. Bio or not, he is their father.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 11:21 PM
2

Um... I used the "suggest title" option here.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 03:01 AM
2

ah, did a quick searh and dint't see it.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:29 AM
2

my point is differingf opinions shouldn't end friendships.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 10:20 PM
6

You can always sue. Winning and collecting... I'm happy that i'm out and AFAIK, she's still homeless. I don't have to deal with any of them
/r/MensRights14/03/15 03:57 AM
44

I've got two incidents I can think of off the top of my head. I've been homeless a few times. One (mens) shelter required every resident to go through a weekly domestic violence class, run by the city. The first day the teacher made the statement "Only women can be abused. it is physically impossible for men to be abused" When I objected to this, her "proof" was that men are phisically larger. When I refused to accept this "fact", I was banned from that shelter for a week. I did file a complaint…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 08:17 PM
2

Two other friends. I and the other girl i mentioned grew up with these two girls. The first, actually was my neighbor, for a while. She was born with a rare disease known as Epidermolysis Bullosa. At the time of her death last year, She was one of the oldest known people with this disease. During her life, she was a professional Artist, Singer (as in sold both) and in High School she was a drummer. (because she could). She left behind as her legacy the charity she founded, which runs a summer ca…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 02:04 AM
2

Little late, But I want to add a very close friend. We both grew up in the same cult. She left it, along with an abusive relationship when she was about 20. Today she's married to a career military officer. She's an adoptee. When she left, she (as she told me, due to DNA testing) found she was of Jewish stock, and converted to Messionic Judism, which is somewhat unpopular both by Jews and Christians. In addition to the four sons she has, She and her husband adopted a beautiful little girl. She i…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 01:46 AM
5

Prostate cancer is a hallmark of privilege. Whiskey Tango Foxtrot.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 07:33 AM
9

When I was growing up, with the date rape scare and workplae sexual harrassment, women were trying to figure out why they couldn't get dates.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 09:16 PM
1

Someone more intellegant than us knows the truth.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 05:48 AM
1

All of those you list have the same roots. As a Heathen, i'd say considering all religions, at worst, it's a 50/50 split. without facts to back me up, i'd say I think the scales are tipped towards the equality side, in my opinion
/r/MensRights16/12/14 09:41 PM
3

Long before I had herad of the Mens right movement, back when I was a kid starting to get interested in politics she became, and still is, my favorite Femanist. She's one of the greatest speakers of truth today.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:12 PM
1

well, I was thinking C as in See You Next Tuesday, which "does" have one syllable, like it's initial.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/14 01:11 AM
2

Warrior. but still three
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/14 12:30 AM
1

Imgur
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:26 PM
0

I would have been tempted to hog tie her and carry her out that way.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:51 PM
1

as above, I meant the mens rights movement, not /r/mensrights. I see your point, but the difference is the general public doesn't think of the NAACP as being racist. they do think of us as being sexist and hating women.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:54 PM
1

NO, I don't suggest changing the sub. What I am suggesting is when we are accused of being "one of those Mens Rights Activists", we can reply, "No, we are Equal Rights Activists, fighting for men and women to be treated the same" I'm also of the opinion the movement should only cover gender and possibly sexual orientation. the other things you mentioned would benefit coincidently
/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:50 PM
2

do see where everyone is coming from, but I don't see needing to be evenly split. I think the tit for tat mentality is hurting us. we should work against discrimination because it is wrong, not because of who is involved.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:46 PM
1

You misspelled day. Also that money should be taken from salaries of those involved, not taxes of innocent citizens
/r/MensRights12/04/14 06:37 PM
2

16, three because I'm a white male high grad. Probably half my ansers are better marked as 'maybe' thot yes/no
/r/MensRights12/04/14 06:15 PM
-6

agreed
/r/MensRights06/04/14 09:24 PM
2

Yep. When I was a kid I got put on Ritalin. I started having tics. I suspected it was the cause, but until I read wikipedia's page a year or so back i didn't know for sure: The treatment of ADHD in the presence of tic disorders has long been a controversial topic. Past medical practice held that stimulants (such as Ritalin) could not be used in the presence of tics, due to concern that their use might worsen tics;[13] however, multiple lines of research have shown that stimulants can be cautious…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter