~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | I found a "good woman" now I'm in dilemmaRP's always talk about how prenups get 'tossed out all of the time', but I'm here to tell you this is simply not true. Prenups are an extremely effective way to protect your assets given that you go about getting one the right way. No way is a court going to throw a prenup because "she was under emotional duress due to fear of being abandoned." Guys get into trouble because a) They spring it on her close to the wedding date, b) They don't hire independent counsel, c) They negotiate in bad faith,… | /r/TheRedPill | 16/07/14 05:01 AM |
| 4 | Man successfully sued for $50k for "breach of promise to marry"In a marriage contract, one party’s promise is adequate consideration for the other party’s promise. - See more at: http://breachofpromise.uslegal.com/#sthash.WBwVflOJ.vYSu5ELR.dpuf What the fuck? A promise is adequate consideration now? This is laughable.When people claim that the legal system is stacked against men, it is easy to write it off as a conspiracy. But then you see shit like promise=consideration, and realize that this law effects only men. | /r/TheRedPill | 07/12/13 10:38 PM |
| 2 | Man successfully sued for $50k for "breach of promise to marry"This is the response that makes the most legal sense. In order to recover damages of that amount, it must be reliance damages. What most likely happened was that she recovered under to principal of promissory estoppel, which means that she relied on his promise, to her detriment. Of course, this principal is an "equitable" one, and is not really traditional contractual breach. You can not get punitive damages for something like that btw. Overall, my official legal position is that this is bullsh… | /r/TheRedPill | 07/12/13 10:26 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter