TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

naaawww Archive

View 1 post and 115 comments by naaawww on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
24

Humournaaawww/r/MensRights15/11/25 05:53 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Which country is this?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/26 06:22 PM
43

On the bright side, people alert us to the redflags in that movie so it’s a pretty easy “not interested”, “don’t recommend,” etc in the algorithms to not see it. On the downside, there’ll usually be a new psyop about a random thing people attribute to said movie/characters that’ll be fresh judging-men material… but ai exists and you can just ask it to summarise the drama about it.
/r/MensRights02/08/26 01:19 AM
-3

Supposed
/r/MensRights27/07/26 11:44 PM
1

And this still doesn’t include all the scenarios…
/r/MensRights27/07/26 05:29 AM
90

Ever since that statistic came out saying lesbian couples were the highest, there’s been a socially conscious collective push to fix that statistic so it isn’t true.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/26 06:06 AM
4

Alopeciacide
/r/MensRights28/06/26 02:16 AM
27

I didn’t know earthquakes held contempt for women and girls /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 11:03 PM
2

The word’s basically reclaimed since single mother-hood is a virtue now not a sin.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/26 07:19 AM
8

Really wish we were able to click “not interested” with NowThis posts on YouTube.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/26 08:33 AM
10

Sending people to space is still incredibly dangerous, and having a woman possibly hurt possesses a risk to the goal of the mission, the company and their continual space endeavours. I’m sad to say it, but if these men were harmed or killed going to space, it would not cause nearly as much social backlash and witchhunting .
/r/MensRights13/06/26 10:15 PM
7

7news Melbourne. This is misleading and deceptive…
/r/MensRights13/06/26 12:35 AM
5

I wouldn’t assume losing traction, it’s more likely being changed how they talk about it, particularly to susceptible individuals they can convert and then avoid and quiet down around individuals who’d snitch; because every woman has their feminism which they internalise within themselves and every man and their gender issues/men’s rights, being thought different and personal to the popular moment. I’d guess overt feminism is in a bit of a social taboo phase atm, but like a fun taboo if that mak…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 06:53 PM
51

Abusive anything really… bfs, gfs, aliens, demons, gods, but they do fixate on the problematic maleness than anything else though…
/r/MensRights26/05/26 09:02 PM
6

Oh… I was actually considering watching euphoria lately. Sounds like the Ken thing from Barbie tbh, a comically incompetent character burdened with a message that’s meant to be impressionable to a demographic, but you’ve bonded over vilifying them all show long, so of course nobody’s gonna believe anything that happens to them as real, they’re a caricature. (Although that’s just my presumption, perhaps it’s subverting somehow. idk bigotry is self reinforcing) Well, it’s certainly weird. You don’…
/r/MensRights12/05/26 07:33 PM
7

Oh… very much a redditor then. I’m gonna bring a random other name into this because she’s literally like Jameela Jamil, but her arguments at least sound reasonable (despite kinda quietly holding the same disposition as Jameela, from what I’ve noticed). Kidology. It’s literally just the British accent and the adages. She’ll have one mildly uncomfortable conversation/ interaction, then spin it into an entire slew of video essays trying to “understand” people, analyse social behaviour, or psychoan…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 06:56 PM
8

Definitions are whatever they want them to be.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 05:14 AM
2

Hello Hasan Piker. You’re egosurfing here aren’t ya? I’m judging (but tbh gossip really does make for good content).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 04:19 AM
13

imo it does start from a place of sympathy, but whether that sympathy stays sympathetic without falling into it’s nearby emotional well of pity is hard to gauge. But there are many A-okay women who genuinely want to open the door to men’s rights conversations and normalise them in public consciousness without judgement or ridicule.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 10:15 PM
-3

What do you not get about the “no ai” rule. It makes us seem lazy, gullible to ai’s made up jargon and uneducated.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 08:48 AM
4

And a huge weakness of the men’s rights movement is the constant infighting. We’re not exactly in a position to remove others from the discussion without an adequate reason. Everyone has their own slant to men’s rights and you just kinda have to be aware of those takes. Degrading them is too much effort and helps nobody. Understanding their stance but respectfully and realistically stating your difference to the idea is easier.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 07:16 AM
12

I’m not onboard with the vague finger pointing. It’s your feed, block what you don’t want to see. Yeah odds are there’s a new wave grift (2024’s backlash to feminism + chronically online left misunderstanding about what men’s social issues truly are…), but we’re old enough now and can just scroll through their history to vibe check. Easy. Done (Also I’m male, not a woman, not trans or anything, I just wear different avatars to see how that affects people’s reactions to my comments)
/r/MensRights26/04/26 10:00 PM
2

Idk kys is a pretty common sentiment among those types of women
/r/MensRights24/04/26 03:12 AM
7

Study: does ragebaiting men, rage bait men? Findings: yes, ragebaiting men does ragebait men.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 10:23 PM
8

Idk… we talk about generalisations all the time on here. Grain of salt
/r/MensRights16/04/26 09:46 AM
15

Some obvious mean girls wrote these questions…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/26 05:30 PM
13

If you’ve ever read yaoi, the shipped characters are so so weirdly written (when it’s not supposed to be weird). It’s literally men-writing-women but like women-writing-men and it’s bad…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 05:16 AM
6

That’s kinda an oversimplification, so no. People can have multiple reasons to want to have or not want to have a family so it’s not really a unique sentiment driven by anti-feminism.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 06:23 AM
17

She’s here to preach not to teach dear
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/26 10:06 AM
7

I just tap the share, not interested and then tick the second from the bottom four; misleading, inappropriate, repetitive, promotional. Idk if it actually does anything, but I get questions like “is this video appropriate for tiktok” every now and again, which seems to reference those same report tags. So I just hope someone else flags it as well and tanks the videos trendability, if not worse. Idk if actually does anything though. You can also tick disinterested in certain topics as well, and a…
/r/MensRights24/03/26 06:45 AM
0

Likely a biased study. For example, sidestepping underperforming p-values by asking incredibly vague, subjective questions, then somehow attributing the results to whatever the researchers want to prove. On top of that, they may be selecting an arbitrary demographic and omitting others to fit a preferred outcome.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 10:20 PM
1

Femkirkinism
/r/MensRights20/03/26 10:48 PM
50

Because they’re essentially confessionals. A lot of the guys here keep things bottled up for a long time, and when they finally find a space like this it feels very different from the rest of the world. And they can speak openly without worrying that someone is silently judging them or labelling them with all the modern stereotypes. The Redditors here also share a lot of similar perspective, which can feel very, very affirming. Hearing others say, “Yeah, this is real, and it’s happening to a lot…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 06:36 AM
6

Husband: “don’t kill me! Please! 🙏” Wife: “I’m donnnne… obeying you.” (Both of us can use liberal definitions of the term “obey”)
/r/MensRights12/03/26 09:40 AM
2

They are correct
/r/MensRights12/03/26 04:10 AM
13

Women’s abuse helpline staff: 50+ people. Men’s abuse helpline staff: one 40 hr/w person.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 05:01 AM
2

Women bump into each other in sports all the time, referees give them yellow/red cards. When you play a physical sport expect the people around you to get physical and have some accidents.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 07:47 PM
5

? Why?? What’s even the point? Any manager would’ve let a woman use the mens if the women’s was backed up. A lot of the time they’re just two toilet seats anyway. This doesn’t need to be codified by law whatsoever. Some German politician’s got ibs probably. A lot of laws being passed nowadays are projections…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 07:41 PM
1

I would like to know as well. I was getting into Superstore (it’s genuinely really funny) but then I learned America (name of the actor) genuinely hates, resents and blames men. So ugh, no. I’m sure I can find better female leads.
/r/MensRights09/03/26 03:36 AM
-14

What do incels and Excel have in common? They both incorrectly assume something is a date. (I’m calling the dingus an incel. They’re assuming it’s sexual when it clearly isn’t, hence, incel)
/r/MensRights27/02/26 08:03 PM
1

It’d be nice if we just copied the text of the article into the post rather than direct traffic to the actual site.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 05:22 AM
1

In that last quote that’s just women calling men angry…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 10:11 AM
1

Dirk
/r/MensRights17/02/26 12:39 PM
3

I usually just ask for a synopsis asking about if it’s kinda manhating from ChatGPT about those movies so I don’t have to even really search them.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 10:30 AM
11

Wear a crop top and head sock
/r/MensRights22/01/26 10:48 PM
-10

You can’t use female, it’d work better with just fem Edit: “women not females” is already an established retort in public consciousness, using the word female is dumb, it’d just backfire.
/r/MensRights18/01/26 07:03 AM
1

Idk if this is tangentially related, but a common hair-loss prevention medication, finasteride, has a common side effect of dry eyes. And dry eyes make it difficult to cry. So all those people saying men don’t cry… I think they’re just running off a huge misunderstanding…
/r/MensRights14/01/26 10:15 AM
4

Yeah, songs that genuinely, truthfully (no fake sauce) hype men up and acknowledge us are absolutely awesome. And I’m pretty sure we’ve noticed that there have been songs that do this in recent years. They’re not hard to find, which is excellent! But I try really hard to be wary of my influence. I don’t wanna link songs or new artists to movements they may not want to openly represent. (Not to say that running with a boy power theme for an album wouldn’t work, if you’ve heard on social media, pe…
/r/MensRights10/01/26 09:53 PM
24

I want to know the questions they used and the method before reading into any statistics.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 07:46 PM
101

Ya, it’s why I made a post about that a month ago (I’ve since deleted it, but I’ve copied the recommendations list of the books). I think it’d unironically be kinda good for the men’s rights community to have a book club. Knowledge is power, and reading is the number #1 largest determinant to academic success (which is a men’s rights issue), it’s totally in our interest to start reading more.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 10:30 AM
11

Literally so many of those books are demented. Even in the school library, like wtf are you doing to that man 😨
/r/MensRights19/12/25 10:53 PM
9

You just proclaimed your party openly sexist lol. Why?
/r/MensRights13/12/25 08:32 PM
7

Manterrupting became a thing lol
/r/MensRights08/12/25 11:15 PM
16

And these same people support adult crime adult time… like, what?
/r/MensRights29/11/25 06:29 AM
3

I’d rather they remove private accounts Edit: as in accounts that hide their activity, I still like the anonymous nature of reddit, question their choices kinda thing.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 07:47 PM
9

You know Medlife Crisis, that YouTube doctor, said a similar thing. He just doesn’t want to finger men’s assholes lol. That’s where the empathy’s at. If only there was a more dignified way to check, you know, like a mammogram, where doctor and patient don’t even need to lock eyes because it’s not gay.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 07:31 PM
1

I don’t think this is the final solution…
/r/MensRights28/11/25 07:47 AM
6

Got an ad this week for a show “He Had It Coming,” supposed to be a satire. The ad’s first two words were “bad feminists,” which I thought was unusual, but besides that it’s a feminist show. Like adolescence probably… I asked AI for its take on the show, and it said it was probably misandristic after outlining what happens in the story. So I’m not gonna watch it. It has its audience. (And to think the writers are Redditors reading this very comment… helicoptering)
/r/MensRights27/11/25 11:17 PM
25

That’s a lot of intersectionality groups not being helped… I see why gay guys and black women are starting to feel factionless
/r/MensRights26/11/25 08:59 PM
4

Ugh, that’s so icky. tbh I had a similar reason, that’s kinda why I grew out of therapy. All the other things that I could talk about were covered but broaching the idea of institutional sexism, that was actually insane. (The therapist wasn’t female btw, but I’d gotten to know him well enough that, our values on issues were just too different, like, you’re just basing your advice on your ideology dude, and it wasn’t at all helpful) Not to discredit good therapists though. Nontraditional gender i…
/r/MensRights20/11/25 09:58 PM
6

Men
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:51 AM
16

Ana psychologist has a doctorate in clinical psychology, which is higher than a masters, as well as a bachelors in mansplaining. (Yes ik this is a mean comment, but what’s been said is out there. Like, Ana, must you stand by your words?)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/25 09:37 PM
1

Thanks these are nice, I’m most interested in the middle one, I’ll add that to my reading list.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 11:16 AM
2

Yeah, I’ve noticed that too. It’s hard to read nowadays. It’s why I’m asking on here. Everyone deserves to find entertainment in reading.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 07:40 AM
2

Some examples from the novels/series I’ve really enjoyed are; maze runner (or James dashner in general, very apolitical) Divergent (also very a political) Harry Potter (typical ikr) Mortal engines Percy Jackson Eragon The hobbit (JRR Tolkien) Demon Road Hunger Games City of Ember Foundation series (Isaac Asimov) The giver Uglies I’ve can’t remember a lot of the not super famous authors off the top of my head. But I’m pretty open to genre (I say this listing only young adult novels…). and to any …
/r/MensRights15/11/25 07:21 AM
2

Some of these works a pretty literal to this kind of sub lol, I’m interested.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 07:05 AM
1

Thank you these sound really interesting. I’ve known of The Wheel of Time from The Golden Compass, but haven’t read it. I think that one might be a nice one to start with.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 07:01 AM
1

Nice, I’ll try it.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 06:23 AM
23

Not to call you out or anything but obvious use of ai is pretty disreputable.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 09:24 PM
1

Your welcome ✌️ And please be kind. Otherwise, 🥖
/r/MensRights13/11/25 12:33 PM
1

Here you go
/r/MensRights13/11/25 10:16 AM
1

lol
/r/MensRights13/11/25 07:43 AM
1

Deez
/r/MensRights13/11/25 07:41 AM
1

Wow
/r/MensRights13/11/25 07:31 AM
2

High five fam 🖐️ Hi bored, I’m dad.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 07:30 AM
11

A land of thrones
/r/MensRights09/11/25 08:02 PM
10

Hey Ana, if you’re reading this, hi 👋, you’re very confident, but dial it down with the gossip
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 09:04 PM
1

I’d usually say: “That’s just mean and unhelpful. But I’m open to feedback if you give me more detail about what I did wrong.” (If their criticism is legit, that’s great, you got feedback. Talking it out might actually be fun and insightful. If it’s crazy, well, sometimes you don’t really need to answer back if it’s too vile. But you can point out the exaggerations and judgment, and try to get them to put themselves in your shoes. You should be open to them explaining themselves the same way as …
/r/MensRights17/10/25 09:43 PM
2

Nothing about revenge is really ethical…
/r/MensRights16/10/25 03:30 AM
1

I think a lot of guys just aren’t the best with their words. Like, some people in here make innocuous claims without knowing there’s readily established anti-responses to overinflate the severity of their original comment. (Also I say “anti-response”, it’s not a standard term, but it’s like a predictable, prepackaged reaction, designed not to engage with the original point, but to neutralise, moralise or escalate it, like reframing it as harmful, problematic or threatening.)
/r/MensRights09/10/25 09:40 PM
12

What’d be the outcome of that?
/r/MensRights22/09/25 04:10 AM
1

Have you heard of Doctor Peter/Doctor Disney on TikTok? He’s got some things about hospital corruption…
/r/MensRights09/09/25 10:14 PM
50

Some of her stuff is honestly very good, but other times it’s obvious she’s sourced her opinions from Reddit, which, as we know, is not the best place to get ethical advice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/25 08:12 AM
5

Why’d they have to go out with a bad take like that, way to ruin the memory of it.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 09:20 PM
3

Put this through ChatGPT [prompt: fix grammar without changing my wording] and then edit out the emdashs. Your text will be clearer.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 10:26 PM
5

The profile you chose to post this on is a bit of a choice… but you can be kinky and an advocate. Men’s rights could do with a bit more of a bro force; like a community that’s genuine about bringing bros’ experiences together and bonding as friends over the validity that something feels off in the discourse around men’s social issues. Ingrained trust issues are what I believe tends to keep this movement from reaching mainstream. Guys don’t know who they can open up to, so some may unjustly quest…
/r/MensRights31/07/25 03:46 AM
4

Don’t use google’s ai overview as a source. It’s very often wrong…
/r/MensRights28/07/25 11:27 PM
5

It looks cool. It adds flames to the fire so it makes things worse… but idk how to make things better at this point with all the laser finger pointing? ~I’m skeptical though~ why on earth can I not trust anything online? Because the same founders of tea app can just copy their code and make a tea app for men. Idk if this is by the same founder as tea app, or if they share a parent company or something.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 09:59 PM
4

It’d be so funny if some of those stories on the tea app were ai generated. I mean aita authors already have the chops do it.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 10:12 PM
8

Feminists would call me a feminist, but I’m kind of repulsed by that label. I probably would identify with it if it was practiced in a way less mean and bully like way.
/r/MensRights21/07/25 09:21 PM
5

If you don’t mind me asking; what influence do you hope this research will have? And for whom do you think this research would be most useful for when completed?
/r/MensRights17/07/25 09:33 PM
1

You can just agree to disagree, there should be no harm in doing so if they’re a reasonable person. If they’re not a reasonable person (like they’re out for vengeance or something) probably dodge the question and change it to a topic you have some identity advantage on. Although this is just my theory what would help you not get doxxed if this conversation comes up in real life, idk if that’ll actually work though if they’re openly, homophobic, ableist, racist, theophobic, possessive, a bully wh…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 07:48 PM
7

Huh, it really is kind of unclear what they define as extremist content. For the most part it doesn’t sound that anti-maley anymore, but they’ve got this category called glorification which is very vague, and sounds abusable. I hope the Australian Safey Commisioner does some egosurfing and factors in what ideologies are really acceptable. It’d be weird to flag down men’s social issues as extremist. I mean, we’re not even organised, nor do most of us have consolidated views (like I’m a feminist i…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 06:38 AM
-6

You want us to take your side because you posted it on here… but I think the answer here is to share the workload. And do away with the recurrent demands that won’t let up if there is no peaceful answer. It’s gonna infinitely build up if neither of you let go. So be aware when both your behaviours are verging into bullying territory, and politely but firmly as them to stop.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 10:09 PM
8

Press “X” to doubt
/r/MensRights11/07/25 09:15 PM
1

My top argument is that it’s vague. You can use it to describe basically anything, and bringing it up in discussion kind of just makes the topic less clear and more bloated. Like, what about patriarchy do you want to talk about today? Oh, everything… sure girl, why not... I’ll just stay here and sit pretty while the patriarchy’s talking. Bringing up the definition to “clarify” is also not helpful. I want to know your individual views on patriarchy and how that matters to you, not just the rote c…
/r/MensRights11/07/25 09:08 PM
5

Huh, I could’ve sworn feminism was bigger before?
/r/MensRights11/07/25 09:06 AM
-3

I’d prefer people move away from the goal of defeating feminism, and rather point it out for what it is when people use it to justify something unreasonable.
/r/MensRights07/07/25 09:14 PM
1

Taking a moderate stance is not simping
/r/MensRights02/07/25 10:52 PM
0

Move your own goalpost man, baby steps, what’s listening if not first being heard.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 11:34 PM
1

Also just to clarify, it’s totally oaky to use the no true Scottsman argument. I’m just saying don’t say “no true scottsman” when you use it.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 11:15 PM
1

I believe it’s possible. If the core of a lot of naysayers’ argument is that “it’s not important enough,” or “they’re all [insert random pejorative], therefore they shouldn’t be believed,” then you only really need, like, one or two calls to reason or empathy (at least online) to disarm their argument. Most people in the world are functional, reasoning adults now, and should likely side with the person with the most moderate, non-antagonistic, and patient stance. Non-experienced debaters will me…
/r/MensRights28/06/25 10:55 PM
2

I hope this is not too controversial an opinion, but James Bond/007 isn’t really one of the huge IPs I care all that much about anymore. I think the genre has aged a lot (heists, spies, huge criminal underworld-type shows, they’re so, so difficult to write for, tbh), so I think literally any different characters or setting would help the genre feel fresh. But I also didn’t really like Oceans 8 (which is basically the feminist equivalent of James Bond). I think it might’ve been because you could …
/r/MensRights28/06/25 09:02 PM
-19

I said, 'Go ahead, give us nothing, girl,' in the nicest way possible. This is like a nothing-burger, karma-farming post on this sub. Develop your idea, dude, please. 🙏
/r/MensRights27/06/25 01:35 AM
-31

This is like the men’s rights equivalent of a lukewarm take, I’d appreciate if you reflected on this opinion further be to an insight that was more distinctly your own.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 12:47 AM
1

I’m so sorry to call you out, but this is a no true 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿Scotsman 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿. Of course there are some that don’t like gay men, but they’re not at all important in men’s rights.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 09:07 AM
2

It’s not at all a common opinion on here tbh. I’m gay, and it doesn’t really matter which way a guy swings in this sub. But it might not be that way for women, or gay women… some are still pretty bitter about how man hate negatively affects their lives, and vent that frustration on women, but really those people are usually called out for their rubber banded behaviour. A lot of us here want modernity, not to go backwards in egalitarian equality.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 08:59 AM
2

I don’t really ever think about returning a bad name with a bad name. It’s not persuasive or productive. If you just stay patient with them, and acknowledge to yourself, that sometimes their views might be rigid, it doesn’t really matter what they say or call you or others, because they never gave you or them the proper time of day in the first place. It really is about choosing your battles, and honestly, some people aren’t open to feedback.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 07:43 AM
4

Idk, it’s not really a secret she writes songs talking down to men when she mentions them. And in terms of reclaiming the word, it’s not really a shirt I can imagine people willingly wearing; it’s a bit clunky… perhaps doing a fake-out of the word? Like Manchilly/Manchilli, Manchildwoman, womanmanchild; basically anything that just kind of piggybacks off of the searchable word of the song. (But just imagine Sabrina Carpenter coming on here and making these very shirts, lol)
/r/MensRights25/06/25 09:04 PM
5

Tbh the account did just look like it woke up at a random time after the date it was made, which does look like bot behaviour, because humans don’t usually completely lurk for that long. But you’re also usually able to tell if they’re a bot by the quality of their responses (if any). This guy seems to have a lot of responses, so that should’ve cleared him of seeming fake or being suspicious. AITA does have gatekeepers, and he might’ve been better spreading the question across those multiple subr…
/r/MensRights25/06/25 08:34 PM
1

Rule 4?
/r/MensRights24/06/25 04:17 AM
0

wtf are doing dude, isn’t this brigading
/r/MensRights24/06/25 04:09 AM
2

Bro, this post is kind of disinteresting…
/r/MensRights23/06/25 08:51 PM
-1

They don’t really need to agree with you. You just need to give it an honest try, and if they sound insane, they sound insane, you don’t need to go further. We’re on reddit; and other people are going to read the debate and draw their own opinions on who’s more right. And for me personally, I consider it a win, if I’ve stirred the discussion that’s all you need to kind of win.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 08:36 AM
-3

Because it’s one of the best ways to voice your opinions without getting disregarded. If you acknowledge that you are open to accepting or understanding part of their beliefs then they’ll likely be more open to accepting and understanding parts of your beliefs.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 06:11 AM
2

As easy as it is to push the toxicity around women’s issues away, I think we still very much need to at least listen, care, and attempt to understand their point of view. Gender issues are a total flaming match nowadays, and it’s very easy to get kind of dumb, stuck, and rooted to one side. I think it’s appropriate to support a take when you feel it is genuinely aligned with your own individual views, and to not support a take when it’s not. But at the end of the day, we, like all Reddit rules, …
/r/MensRights23/06/25 05:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter