TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nabokob Archive

View 1 post and 12 comments by nabokob on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

nabokob/r/MensRights07/05/12 04:15 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Wow, bold, you must really mean it!
/r/MensRights07/05/12 06:30 AM
0

To your right: "Short list of the challenges faced by males: False accusations 1 2 3 4 5 Vilification 1 2 3 4 5 Custody Discrimination 1 2 Legal Discrimination 1 Education Discrimination 1 2 Lack of social support 1 Uneven distribution of workplace deaths 1 Selective service Prevalence of Male Genital Mutilation 1 2 3" Maybe "tenets" wasn't the exact word. Official positions? I'm not your "opposition". I want exactly what you do - equality. I'm sorry that we have different ideas of what that is.…
/r/MensRights07/05/12 06:20 AM
-1

Ahh, you see, those articles are about women. When women are underrepresented, that's just the free market. This thread is about men potentially being underrepresented. Isn't one of men's rights tenet problems about men increasingly falling behind in school? There's obviously something unequal going on there (because women are less intelligent).
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:56 AM
-21

This has been posted before.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:46 AM
-1

What do you mean by "shoot ourselves in the foot"? Make you acknowledge that the law isn't intrinsically biased against men, because it was almost entirely created by men? That doesn't make any sense. Obviously, women made them do it.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:44 AM
1

How so? There would be a male and female senate seat for each state, just like there's a HOR seat for each district. Is that a quota?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:40 AM
0

This wouldn't be a quota, though. Unless you think the HOR has a "quota" for people from Wyoming.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:31 AM
0

Wasn't that argument used by the British, though? That every member of Parliament represented every British subject?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:17 AM
-1

But this isn't about governing, it's about representation, and it isn't about merit, it's about representation. I don't know if you remember, but as a country we've actually gone to war over it. And I don't know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:11 AM
-2

I mean, we say that now while we're overrepresented, but what if we weren't? Being a man now sucks, but that would be awful. Almost like being a woman!
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:05 AM
-1

Are they, though? (re: the laws being anti-male) Why would males write laws that discriminate against themselves? I mean, apparently women are against male birth control, but if they had control of actually making laws, they might even deny it to employees of religious institutions.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 04:56 AM
1

Yes, obviously, but in the House of Representatives only one representative is elected per district, so I don't see any feasible way to guarantee equal representation for each gender.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 04:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter