TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nagballs Archive

View 0 posts and 73 comments by nagballs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

...yeah, I dunno what I was thinking. You clearly aren't a person that can read more than 6 words at a time unless there's a picture for you to color. "lol u guys are babies grow up and take responsibility" is at least a little more honest than a lot of the other arguments against it. So congrats. I honestly agree with you on one point: "lol, this sub." Yeah. It's tiring.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:53 PM
4

This is why no one can argue about this. Because men wanting judicial abortion is boiled down to "lol you just want to avoid responsibilities" No one said "involuntary abortion". Don't be intentionally dense. Men just don't want to be held accountable financially responsible for a child they don't want. If everyone could be adults on this site for 5 fucking seconds, we could probably come to a conclusion that men who were forced into an intentional pregnancy by women fucking with the birth contr…
/r/MensRights15/03/18 10:32 PM
6

He made statements based on the article that was linked. He even changed his stance when OP came and provided more sources. Wanting to make sure that you have all the available facts before making a decision is not trolling.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 09:12 PM
0

Yeah, I'll give you that much. It has sources. I just don't think starting out with veiled insults and negative connotations is constructive, and the whole vibe of the page is accusatory (in my opinion). I read through it, and there are a few points that had merit, but almost everything can be refuted by "teach your kid to wash his dick" and "let them decide when they're older". Especially their take on allegation 13, to give an example. That it is a parents "moral and legal right" to circumcise…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 06:43 AM
3

Anti-circumcision cult Yeah, this is gonna be totally unbiased.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:32 AM
2

I wouldn't be surprised if it was someone from AMR that posted "LE R/MENSRIGHTS" when they saw the link here.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 07:05 AM
3

We don't.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 01:44 PM
3

Are you pro-circumcision or pro-infant circumcision? Because there is as difference. No one here is saying that circumcised men are broken or damaged. If they want to get circumcised as an adult, they are free to do that. I don't understand how the consent argument doesn't hold water for you. Infants don't have a choice in the matter. They can't even really think. That's all this movement wants, is men's choice. We want a ban on infant circumcision, not on circumcision as a whole.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 12:23 AM
14

The 2-year relationship with my abusive girlfriend and I would like to disagree.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 03:08 PM
9

And how will he feel when I tell him I forsook thousands of years of Jewish tradition on the off-chance that he might one day want to have a foreskin? Tell him times are changing? Tell him that your son's wishes mean more to you than your religion. Because it should. It's not on the off-chance he might want a foreskin. It's on the off-chance that he may not want to continue following Judaism. If your argument is that circumcision is a religious freedom, then circumcision should be more of a rite…
/r/MensRights06/01/14 06:54 AM
8

If the procedure was only done within the religion, it wouldn't be as big of an issue. I still wouldn't agree with it, but I'm not Jewish, either. As such, the whole "father/son tradition" thing seems a little selfish, at best. How do you know your son will want to be Jewish forever? He may want to make up his own mind as to what religion he follows. He may also want to make up his own mind as to what he wants to do with his foreskin. The movement isn't just about empowering men. It's empowering…
/r/MensRights06/01/14 02:54 AM
1

You'd be right! Wintergreen long cut.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 02:55 PM
15

The argument you had with your wife and her sister isn't grounds for divorce. Her going behind your back and getting your son circumcised is. At the very least, a serious discussion. That's a breach of trust that will have lasting effects on your son. Forever. That's shitty. I'm sure you're past that now, but still, that was a shitty fucking move on her part. I hope you said something.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 12:44 AM
1

The thing is, how would you know if a person is really preventing rape, or just accusing someone to be an asshole? I could get a picture of your face, make a facebook group and accuse you of just about anything. That doesn't make it right. That doesn't make it true. It comes back down to being one person's word against another's. It's still equally difficult to prove, but now there's no court getting in the way of the accuser saying whatever they want. I understand where you're coming from. Rapi…
/r/MensRights27/12/13 01:18 PM
1

Ah, choosing comfort over safety is a different story. Working around machinery, I can see why you wouldn't want to wear baggy sweats and such. I'm still a student right now, Drafting and Design degree. The most dangerous thing that this job has to offer seems to be eye strain from the computer screen. I see no reason I should not be comfortable in a private office, as long as my work is still being completed. Hell, if the work is completed quicker when I'm comfortable, then everyone is happy, r…
/r/MensRights25/12/13 07:20 PM
0

I work best when I'm comfortable, though. I can't concentrate on my task at hand when I'm thinking about how my pants are constricting, or my shoes are uncomfortable, or my tie is too tight. I can finish a CAD drawing pretty quickly in some sweats, with my headphones in and some dip. It's gross, it's unhealthy, and it's probably unprofessional. But the job is getting done.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 06:55 PM
-2

A university would not make the claims public. Only the accused would share such information with friends and family. I speak as a lawyer often tasked with investigating claims on behalf of institutions. They are briefed as to the importance of privacy and the liability of leaking information. It wouldn't have to be the University that let's the information slip. One of the accuser's friends she confided in, who encouraged her to file an anonymous complaint? Or maybe a conceited piece of shit hu…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:19 AM
-2

I don't know. I don't think completely anonymous reports are a good thing for anyone. I'm cynical, and I know way too many shitty people, so I may be a bit biased. I think if the accuser wishes to remain anonymous to the general public, that's fine, but only if authority figures know who filed the charge/complaint, in case it happens to be false, and only if the identity of the accused is also kept secret from the general public.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:46 PM
-6

Library computer. I'm sure if it gets out of hand, they'll start tracing IPs. The smart ones will find a way around that. You don't have to get very far in criminal court to ruin a reputation with a false claim. But yeah, this particular form of protest is stupid. That's why a fraction of the 80,000 readers agreed with it, and why it started as 4chan being dicks and not a legitimate protest in the first place.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:26 PM
-6

It's an anonymous report, if no one finds out who filed it, there will be no consequences. Some people in this sub have disappointed me. Filing false reports is never okay. They should have protested this a different way. However, you can't deny that allowing people to file sexual harassment/assault complaints with zero evidence of the crime taking place is a little sketchy. Clearly it goes past a Mens' Rights issue, since obviously, anyone can do it. It was a broken, unfair system right out of …
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:56 PM
-9

To suffer legal consequences, yes. Societal consequences, not so much. Being ostracized by friends/peers/family/society due to a false rape claims isn't uncommon. All it needs is for word to get out that someone filed an anonymous claim, and all of a sudden 90% of people won't even talk to the accused. Maybe someone tries to assault them because of "what they did". Maybe a group of people decide to target a specific person. Week after week, there's a huge party, that the accused may or may not h…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:51 PM
-28

It could, sure. I think it's more likely that it will enable people to make false claims. Hell, you saw how easy it was for 4chan to do it. If put a system in place that allows shitty people to be shitty with no consequences, then it's going to happen.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 05:14 PM
-3

No, it's not okay. I think using the system to make false accusations is a shitty thing to do, regardless of why you're doing it. honorable men Really? It's 4chan. No one thinks that they're honorable. 4chan doesn't even think 4chan is honorable. No one who does that is honorable. Maybe some people in this sub have lost sight of that. But there are shitty people in both movements. If you put a system in place that makes it easy for shitty people to be shitty with no consequences, then it's going…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 05:11 PM
-5

srs pls go.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 05:01 PM
24

Nonono, I think you must be mistaken. See, SRS doesn't brigade, they just post direct links to comments, and then put in a half-hearted "now seriously, people, don't brigade" on the sidebar, which is obviously irrefutable proof that it has never happens, has never happened, and will never happen anytime in the future ever.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 05:50 PM
9

http://np.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/1bgj2u/how_does_rfeminism_feel_about_the_male_birth/ On this thread, most of them seem to be pro-male contraception.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:42 AM
9

Or we could just thank the police for noticing that there was a 13 year old there with an adult male who did not appear to be her parent. I'm not saying they couldn't have done a better job at ascertaining the situation, but in a world where too many people look the other way, this could be viewed as a positive. That's ridiculous. Absolutely no one looks the other way when it comes to children being abducted. That's serious shit that the general population doesn't react well to. Going in the opp…
/r/MensRights03/12/13 12:28 PM
4

As would I. I'll be watching that thread closely, I'm interested in seeing how this plays out.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 06:21 PM
7

Because it doesn't really matter which gender is affected more. Sure he's right, but who gives a fuck when people are offing themselves? Everyone's human, and they deserve help. Technically, in regards to /r/SuicideWatch, it would be safe to say that more women would post, since they attempt suicide more often. But that doesn't even matter, because you shouldn't go there with the idea that you're only gonna help men, or only going to help women. That's just shitty. Go to help people.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 01:19 AM
7

I don't believe that takes women attempting to commit suicide multiple times. My aunt attempted suicide I think 4 or 5 times before she succeeded. Not that that should matter. Suicide is no joke. Doesn't matter what gender is contemplating, they need help, and they definitely deserve it. Helping people is the way to go, you're right. Arguing semantics doesn't do them any good.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 08:56 PM
-1

It won't make up for not seeing his dad.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 04:29 PM
-1

And moving could be right for the mother, but would not be in the best interests of the father or child.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 04:10 PM
-1

So if the father is trying to arrange these custody agreements, and let's say the woman didn't like these agreements. She wants full custody and child support payments, maybe she thinks the father is an asshole, whatever the reason, she doesn't want to cooperate, so she just leaves. That shows one parent willing to reason and arrange, and one parent that only cares about what they want. I'm not saying pregnant women should be locked up until they give birth. Truthfully, I don't know what the sol…
/r/MensRights25/11/13 03:37 PM
-2

But at 7 months, you can start arranging custody agreements in anticipation of the child being born.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 02:56 PM
-1

"To spite the father" was a hypothetical. That's not what happened in this scenario, I understand. But you're fighting for a woman's right to get away with that. There is a child present. I'm as pro-choice as the next person, but at 7 months, it's a bit late for the abortion. It's even harder to do custody arrangements when one party isn't present.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 03:05 AM
-2

You're not saying a child shouldn't see their father, but you're essentially giving women a free pass to do just that. I'm not saying you can force pregnant women into a cage until they give birth. I'm saying if they're going to relocate, then there should be an agreement, and understanding with custody arrangements. They should communicate the future of their child like decent human beings. If a pregnant woman just gets on a plane and leaves to spite the father, it really does show that she put…
/r/MensRights25/11/13 12:05 AM
-4

Is depriving a child of the right to see their father not damaging?
/r/MensRights24/11/13 11:52 PM
-1

No, I wasn't saying that at all, but since we're assuming things, you could make the case that she isn't fit to raise a child at all, because her complete disregard for the feelings of the father suggest that she cares about no one but herself. Just because no one can stop you from being a shitty person, that doesn't give you a free pass to be a shitty person. I have you tagged as AMR frequenter, so I know I'm not going to change your mind. Just look at it from someone else's point of view. You …
/r/MensRights24/11/13 11:22 PM
-2

It's one-sided because one person has completely control over something that is the product of two people. What she did should have some type of ramification. It showed a complete disregard for the feelings of the father. It doesn't deserve jail-time, but it deserves something.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 10:52 PM
-1

Can you see how that's shitty and one-sided, though? A father just wants to see his child. I agree that you can't expect her to be locked up with no freedom to go anywhere, but she should show a little decency and not move across the country with what is rightfully half his. Even if she's the one carrying the child, it didn't just materialize there with no help from him.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 09:18 PM
-2

Right, but the fetus didn't just appear from nowhere. He help create it, he should be given some say in what happens to it. "This fetus is mine and mine alone! My body, my choice!" Well, if you're not gonna give the father any rights at all, then have fun asexually reproducing.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 09:04 PM
0

Well, he didn't have to deck her when her back was turned. It's more, I thought he was an asshole for throwing a cheap shot when she wasn't looking. But the time between her landing a blow like that and him seeing blood and getting pissed is pretty believable. To be fair, most people that sucker punch other people are huge assholes.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 03:24 PM
1

Exactly. I thought that dude was a huge asshole until I saw his face. She fucked him up. If it happened to me, as soon as I saw my blood, I wouldn't have been able to stop myself. Still not saying he was in the right. But anger is a powerful emotion. I would have lost control when the bleeding started.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 06:30 AM
0

I agree with you, that dude is a fucking asshole. However, she deserved what she got. She broke the first rule of fighting. You don't take your eyes off your opponent until you know you can get away clean. If I sucker punch someone in the face, and they don't hit the ground, the fight is still going on, whether I like it or not. Her thinking was that she could get away with that, because she's a woman. "How could a man hit me, even when I begin the altercation? I can't basically do what I want."…
/r/MensRights23/11/13 09:45 PM
1

hmm... Yeah, that is interesting. I'm at a loss, I dunno why they would do that..
/r/MensRights20/11/13 02:16 PM
3

I saw that post on /r/funny. I actually thought it was pretty funny. Even though "parent proof" would be more accurate for me, the OP of that thread probably only had an issue with his less that tech-savvy dad. That doesn't make it sexist. Are we really going to get angry at every post or news story that doesn't specifically use gender neutral pronouns? That seems a little over-reactive. Lighten up.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 01:27 PM
1

Well it's more saying they punched themselves in the face and go to jail for assaulting themselves by taking CP of themselves and getting done for it. Not what you're saying, and not in the eyes of the law. Children have gotten arrested for taking pictures of themselves. Which is utterly ridiculous, and needs to be changed. But the way to change that is not giving one party a free pass. I would be upset if the genders were reversed as well. My stance wouldn't change. And the paedo gets no mentio…
/r/MensRights16/11/13 06:39 PM
1

No, I would say 10-year-olds that are solicited to take photos, the parents should be punished for giving their children the ability to do that in the first place. What kind of parent gives their 10-year-old access to snap chat and/or webcams? The girls in question, I'm assuming, were the same age as the boys being charged. If the boys were old enough to know what they were doing, then the girls should be, too. That's just an issue with the law right now, the judicial system hasn't caught up wit…
/r/MensRights16/11/13 04:44 PM
4

I would be happy if both the girls and boys were charged. (Well, maybe not happy, but at least it's equality). I am not happy that the boys are being charged, while the girls get nothing, nor would I be happy if that were reversed. It's the lack of consistency that I find just fucking appalling.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 06:24 PM
3

Ah, the government going out of it's way to punish men seems like a bit much to me. I just think if there's a CP charge going around, all parties involved (boys and girls) should be held accountable. Just to clarify, I think the CP charge is absolutely ridiculous.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 06:21 PM
2

No, the girls have not been punished enough. The girls should be held at the same standard as the boys in regards to the law. They were the ones who produced the "child pornography" and then distributed it to the boys. Just because they thought the photos were gonna be deleted, just because they trusted the piece of shit boys, that doesn't negate the fact that the girls are the ones who produced, and distributed the photos before the boys even got a hold of them. The law can't say, "well, since …
/r/MensRights15/11/13 06:19 PM
5

No hate, here. I'm circumcised as well. Once I figured out I wasn't born that way, and realized that I was in fact, missing a small part of my penis, I didn't feel very different about it. Sure, I would have liked to make that decision myself, but there's no point getting really mad about it. I have a healthy sex life as well. I don't want kids now, but if I have a son in the future, he won't be circumcised either unless it is the only option for medical reasons. Only a small percentage goes thi…
/r/MensRights12/11/13 04:01 AM
1

Ah, okay then, thanks. This is my first time hearing of/reading it, so I had no idea. It did seem a little far-fetched, but some people are weird/crazy. And being a tad unbelievable didn't make it less interesting.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 03:53 PM
3

He provided a picture of his dick in the device. That doesn't necessarily mean the post was real, though, I guess..
/r/MensRights06/11/13 03:28 PM
7

When a male contraceptive pill was introduced for further funding and research, health ministries which were entirely (or almost entirely) women were against it as a concept.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:32 PM
92

I think the reason for all the "hate" is that this sub, and the movement itself, is that its largely comprised of men who have been wronged, or believe they have been wronged, by the law, women, or feminism in general. There aren't a lot of people that will acknowledge, admit, or even know that men are being discriminated against at all, and a large amount of people that do know this are people that have seen or experienced it firsthand. Because of this, a lot of the members of the movement may …
/r/MensRights04/11/13 07:12 PM
3

If that's what you think is best.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 07:29 PM
3

Exactly! That's why you take steps to protect yourself! You limit your alcohol intake, or you make sure there is someone you know and trust to take care of you if you get wasted. I wouldn't trust a stranger I met at a party with my wallet, would you trust him with your body? No? Then make sure you're safe. Because you can be damn sure rapists will not care about your safety. However, don't assume that everyone at a party is a rapist either. If you're going to a party to meet people and make frie…
/r/MensRights27/10/13 05:23 PM
4

I can't just lie down and take this one. As someone who has had an abusive girlfriend in high school, was laughed at for it, and then was inches away from going to jail because she had a bruise on her leg when I finally pushed her off me because she was trying to yank my hair out. This is a real issue. I was genuinely afraid for my safety at times. And I was genuinely afraid that her family wouldn't accept my side of the story, press charges, and my life would be ruined. I wish I could ignore it…
/r/MensRights27/10/13 04:53 PM
3

It should be a non-issue, but it isn't That man is facing charges for hitting a women that antagonized, instigated an altercation, and assaulted him. And the media is jumping all over the chance to tell the world that he was a convicted felon to strength the story of the aggressor. Who happens to be a woman. Victim blaming. Past actions. Character. Etc.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 04:47 PM
3

Yes, rapists are mindless beasts, and you do have to police yourself. You don't have to rely on others. You have to rely on yourself to not make yourself a target. Of any crime. The "average partygoer" is not a rapist. They are a partygoer. Rapists are rapists, regardless of the setting, and asking them to police their behavior will do absolutely nothing.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 04:44 PM
2

Well, then which is it? Are the people that browse this sub big scary men that just want to stomp around raping and slapping women because they think it's a "right"? Or are they mangina neckbeards whining about their hurt feelings? Or are they people that may have real issues. Men that may have been in an abusive relationship but still went to jail when the cops showed up. Women who are friends with, or related to a man that had a girlfriend that beat him relentlessly in front of an audience tha…
/r/MensRights27/10/13 03:40 PM
2

Yeah, pretty much. If by "throw our hands up in the air in defeat" you meant "take it upon myself to prevent a potential criminal harming me". Actually, no. You missed the point entirely. Rape can be prevented. You saying "well, rapists should just not rape" isn't going to do anything to prevent it, though. At all. I'm going to say it again. It would be great if all of the crime in the world just stopped because we asked it to. But that isn't realistic in the slightest, so why even waste the tim…
/r/MensRights27/10/13 03:31 PM
3

It is though. Nobody here has been saying anything about hitting women because they're bigger and stronger and men can do that with no repercussions. The men that are here just want to be able to defend themselves from danger no matter what organ is or isn't between their aggressor's legs. If one person dies because he was afraid to hit a women that was trying to stab him, then that's far too many.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 03:19 PM
2

You can't just lock someone in their house to prevent them from being mugged, either. Or stabbed. Or assaulted. They're still going to happen, I get it. But why aren't we standing around with 100 dollar bills taped to our naked bodies saying "Don't teach me to protect myself, teach burglars not to burgle!"? Because it wouldn't work. And we know it wouldn't work. So then why is it different with rape? We know it's a heinous crime. Then why the fuck are we against teaching people how to defend the…
/r/MensRights27/10/13 03:12 PM
4

The idea of hitting women for the sake of it is a minority opinion around here, if it exists in this sub at all. I don't like the idea of hitting anyone. I do like the idea of not being attacked. In the world of fighting and self-defense, the world is not split into men and women. It is split into combatants and non-combatants.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 06:11 AM
2

One is a criminal, one is a victim. A criminal isn't going to show self-control just because you ask them nicely. It would be great if it worked, but it doesn't. End of discussion. Telling someone to show some self-control so as to not become a potential victim is sound advice.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 05:51 AM
1

I agree, if two working people want to have a child, it should be understood that someone will have to sacrifice their work time. My parents both worked, but they scheduled their hours in such a way that someone was always home taking care of the children. Feminism should be about equality. Giving women the choice to be the working parent, to be in the same fields as men, etc. It's my opinion that instead, feminism is making women feel as if the are required to work. Wanting to have and raise ch…
/r/MensRights04/10/13 02:21 AM
15

Dude, I can't tell you how many times people have given me shit for wearing flip flops when I go to hang out after work. I'm a lifeguard, it's either wear flip flops or go barefoot. Don't tell me how to dress.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 03:28 AM
2

It's saying that no one is ever "safe" no matter where they are. Self-defense, rape-defense, concealed carry. These are all preventative skills, and failing to learn these skills makes you an easier target. "An ounce of prevention" etc. A cunning thief isn't going to go to a low-income/high "crime culture" neighborhood on the off chance that a wealthy looking target walks by. They're going to go to a place that's low-traffic overall, with a high traffic of wealthy people. Why do you think pickpo…
/r/MensRights23/09/13 07:27 PM
2

I really can't stand the "higher female fanbase means you should hire more women CEOs!" mentality. It's always discrimination. No one ever stops to think about the credentials or skills of the people that are hired, nor does it occur to them that maybe, just maybe, the men that were hired were better qualified for the position or did better in the interview process.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 03:16 AM
2

The two-letter abbreviation for Maryland is MD.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:53 AM
3

What are you asking, exactly? Strong legs and the right leverage, it's totally possible. Unless I missed the point you were making...
/r/MensRights26/08/13 04:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter