TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

namayake Archive

View 7 posts and 231 comments by namayake on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

You don't look like the user Ok_Departure_8243 to me. I wasn't responding to your comment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/26 10:09 AM
8

Be careful with the language you use though. Those aren't "women" trying to push their way into men's spaces, those are feminists. Even if the majority trying to push their way in are women, they're feminist women. And not all women are feminists. Our war is with misandrists and/or feminists, NOT women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 12:51 AM
9

Yeah, there should be male centered spaces where women are welcome so long as they're there to support men. If they're there simply to argue, push women's agendas, "fight the patriarchy", and/or generally be disruptive, they aren't welcome.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 12:45 AM
3

Denying the existence of misandry, regardless of copious amounts of evidence to the contrary, isn't simply revisionism, but is itself misandry. Feminists do what they claim doesn't happen by simply denying its existence. Oh, and in other news, white supremacists claim racism doesn't exist. This isn't a new tactic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 11:33 PM
3

I would say it's one of the reasons, but not the only reason. Conservatives' attitude of "men should pick themselves up by their bootstraps!" is also the cause of systemic misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 11:25 PM
3

The "femosphere" has existed far longer than the manosphere. There have been post-women's lib advice media (books, newspaper columns, magazines, etc.)for decades. It taking the form of social media influencers is simply the newest incarnation, and has existed for at least 10 years now, with likes of people like Anita Sarkeesian. It's now just getting hyped thanks to the birth of the hard-right manosphere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/26 01:06 AM
1

Did you bother trying to do any research? 🤔🤔
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/26 12:07 AM
15

And how much is the femosphere funded by the oligarchs and their organizations? That question is never asked of the manosphere either. Are progressives/humanists now totally deaf to the idea of psy-ops anymore??
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 11:24 PM
8

But what about Hegel, who's considered extremely infuential within leftist theory? He was a brazen misandrist, ignoring the power divide between lower class men and upper class women. And fallaciously universalized the experience of men at the apexes of power, to be the experience of ALL men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/26 09:21 PM
13

Those are feminists, not women. Don't make the same mistake of feminists and confuse gender with ideology. Not only is it false, it's stereotyping and spreads division. Our war is with feminists, NOT women!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/26 01:01 AM
8

I don't believe for one minute it's pointlesss! Hope is only lost when we give up! And calling out both fallacious use of the word, and phony's who lie and call themselves progressive when they aren't, is how we fight back!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 02:39 AM
20

Not intending to be a rabble rouser, but I feel I must point out that what you're calling the "progressive" narrative is actually the feminist narrative. I understand the mainstream, "left-wing" media (which also includes the bulk of "left-wing" posts on social media)call the feminist narrative "progressive". But I think we can all agree that oligarch/corporate owned media sources never push the truth unless it creates or strengthens helpful narratives for the owners. "Progressive" actually mean…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 12:14 AM
1

Right, because it's not like the UN never manipulates its figures to tell a politically convenient narrative. https://socialsommentary.substack.com/p/how-un-falsifies-its-gender-development
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/26 02:42 AM
3

Sorry to butt in but I thought I'd chime in. Creating awareness I believe, is the first step. If they're aware that favoring women is in fact the norm, and such bias is causing harm, they might be more likely to at least take a neutral stance. But if that's not enough, you have to shame them, no different than dealing with anyone who's bigotted toward any demographic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/26 03:03 AM
6

Good to know then, that we have a study now. But we most definitely need more. And even with plenty of evidence, feminists can still claim discriminatory behavior is justified thanks to how "men" treated women in the past--"equality feels like oppression to those who are privileged."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 11:38 PM
18

The problem is it's not just feminists claiming misandry isn't real--some of them in fact do acknowledge its reality. But those who do claim it's only men who oppress other men. As usual, feminists deny women have any responsibility in creating the injustices of our world. And how many studies are there of women systemically oppressing men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 10:46 PM
3

Thom York is a typical, feminist indoctrinated, lefty man. His position is the norm for most lefty men of his generation (gen X), who embrace misandry and self-blame for their gender. I know, because I was born at the tail end of gen X ('79)and have had to put up with them in left-wing spaces all my life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/26 03:42 AM
9

You mean just like sex? That's something feminists need to be reminded of--a person's sex doesn't dictate their character. Stating otherwise is stereotyping and is equally as sexist to men as it is to women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 05:09 AM
7

It makes more sense if you believe the oligarchs use feminism as a tool of division. I do. They spend endless funds pumping it into schools and creating big budget propaganda--feminism is the core ideology of all Disney media for example. Why would they spend so much doing that? They're trying to fuel gender war, that's why.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/25 05:38 AM
1

He's great for promoting division, and keeping people's attention off the fact that we're all getting screwed by the billionaires and corporations. I'll tell you that.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/09/25 05:47 AM
7

Theft is rampant amongst sex workers. They routinely promise services that they demand payment up front for, then bail. If you read customer reviews for services like OnlyFans, the most common complaint is theft. And it's so rampant in fact, that OnlyFans has mostly negative reviews.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/25 12:58 AM
1

Oh, so you're saying countless academic scholars don't read? The PRC and the USSR didn't read? How far do your delusions go?? 🤦
/r/MensRights17/09/25 05:57 AM
7

She's encouraging men to hurt and kill themselves en mass. What else should that be called other than advocating genocide? Your dismissal is narcissistic gaslighting.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/09/25 11:31 AM
8

The comic justifies men being discriminated against because of "all the things they did to women in the past." And then she goes on stating if they can't handle it and need an outlet, to embrace the self-harming and potentially deadly stunts of Jackass. The woman is a man-hating, genocidal monster.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/09/25 11:22 AM
1

Like I haven't heard THAT argument before. Marxist scholars are DIVIDED on whether Marx advocated dictatorships or not. But of course only YOUR sect's interpretation is the correct one. GTFO
/r/MensRights16/09/25 02:54 AM
1

If they defend China, the former USSR, Cuba, etc., then they're communists, not liberals.
/r/MensRights16/09/25 02:46 AM
1

I strongly disagree. As a progressive activist who runs his own progressive economics group on social media, and regularly comments on the posts of other anti-capitalist organizations, I talk to communists almost everyday. Their views on identity are near 1 to 1 identical with liberals, which has caused no end of debate. Their narrative sides with that espoused by the corporate owned liberal media, which begs the question of how they can be revolutionary when they tow the same line as the corpor…
/r/MensRights09/09/25 03:53 AM
1

Then what are marxist feminists? Their views on social issues are identical to liberals. The only place they differ is economics.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 05:14 AM
1

"Socialism" includes a homesteading guarantee. And guaranteeing everyone the ability to homestead would cause our country to go bankrupt? Seriously?? Don't tell me we don't have enough arable land! 🤦
/r/MensRights08/09/25 05:10 AM
0

A welfare state is the only means I know of, of guaranteeing the masses their human rights. And that's the issue here, whether or not they're guaranteed. Democrats don't believe human rights should be guranteed, and make no attempt to guarantee them. And if you don't believe human rights should be guaranteed, you're no lefty or centrist.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/08/25 04:06 AM
0

Well as you make everything so relative, we know you aren't a progressive. And democrats don't support a welfare state. They do nothing to protect the social safety net, and won't give it further funding, let alone restore cuts by republicans. They aren't progressives. And this is known in europe and elsewhere. They're anything but centrists. What you say is a blatant lie.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/08/25 03:25 AM
1

You mean they vote for liberals, who by the rest of the world's standards, are conservatives, and don't stand for human rights. This is not a "no true Scottsman" argument. You either stand for human rights or you don't. And if you don't vote for people who stand for human rights, you're no progressive. It doesn't matter what you call yourself.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/08/25 01:56 AM
0

Regardless of who they say they are, those aren't progressive women. Progressives stand for the human rights of everyone. If you oppose the human rights of any group, or advocate a group be reduced to second class citizens, you're no progressive.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/08/25 11:24 PM
2

My point was that you can be pro-women's lib while still being anti-feminism. You elaborated on the reasons why being anti-feminism is warranted if you're an egalitarian.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 06:39 AM
1

Don't confuse feminism with women's liberation. This is a common mistake. Feminism is a part of women's lib, but isn't the movement itself. It's not necessary to believe in patriarchy theory, men as the oppressor class, internalized misogyny, etc., to believe women are deserving of human rights and equal civil rights.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 02:07 AM
1

Tell me, in what way can men's suicide be framed to seem less threatening to feminists? Is there anything the slightest bit reasonable about that kind of thinking?? What if it were a black suicide epidemic, and white supremacists were in power? Should we be trying to appease them?? This is why I question your sincerity. Men are now seen as the oppressor class, and if you're not willing to tackle that belief specificaly, and aren't willing to bleed for your beliefs like the rest of us, you're no …
/r/MensRights14/06/25 09:30 AM
6

You realize that any attempt to build therapeutic male spaces will be seen as exclusionary to women, and will be protested, potentially violently so, don't you? There have been feminist lead, violent protests of awareness rallies for the male suicide epidemic. How do you think they'd react to the opening of any therapeutic space seen as intentionally exluding women? If you're unwilling to acknowlege the deeply rooted prejudices and animosity that exist toward men as a demographic now, and how gr…
/r/MensRights13/06/25 10:09 AM
2

Those people only represent a tiny handful of people on the left, and most of them are more figureheads than actually occupying positions of power. I live in the San Francisco Bay Area and it's idpol as far as the eye can see. It was actually better prior to the pandemic wiping out the economy and gentrifying the counter culture. Now all left-wing spaces are run by idpol extremists, especially government services. As a cisgendered straight white man, I have to be careful if I go into some place …
/r/MensRights22/05/25 10:11 AM
8

That small, retarded portion of the left has a monopoly on the positions of leadership within the movement, while the followers remain silent, even if they disagree and don't hate men. It's why as a lefty, I won't go near left-wing spaces.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 12:43 AM
7

Because the corporate owned media is feminist, and doesn't report on men's issues. That's why.
/r/MensRights01/05/25 10:22 AM
11

Actually feminism isn't about women's rights and never has been. It's about gender war, and women winning the war. One of, if not the first feminist treaties, The Declaration of Sentiments, outright declares men the wholesale enemies of women--those who've oppressed women in perpetuity since the birth of mankind. The treaties was written during women's suffredge, and essentially establishes what most rational people have come to know about feminism, it's a female supremacist cult, founded on par…
/r/MensRights01/05/25 10:16 AM
14

When arguing with feminists who call me an "incel", I always respond "If refusing to date anti-male fascists like you makes me an "incel", then that's a "shame" I'll bear with pride." That usually shuts them down.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/25 04:05 AM
142

I always reply by saying "the first thing bigots always claim is prejudice against their target demographic doesn't exist." They almost never have a response for that.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 02:11 PM
2

If passive wealth is the basis for funding the UBI, then everyone is owed that money. The conditions of the people receiving it don't matter. As they helped to collectively create it, we have no right to withhold it from them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/25 03:02 AM
3

I think it would be better just to give them extra money to support their child, whether they have other sources of income or not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/25 02:45 AM
3

Or just give everyone a subsistance level UBI, whether they have children or not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/25 01:48 AM
2

I thiink I speak for many here when I say I don't agree that feminism is for everyone. Feminism's base stance is that men are the oppressor class. You can't advocate for the rights and welfare of a demographic you believe is the oppressor. Those who say otherwise are ignorant of the anti-male history of feminism, and blind to the anti-male actions being taken by feminists in the present.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 04:12 AM
3

To fight the problems outlined in the fiction reported by the image, but believed as fact by feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/25 03:57 AM
1

If we live in a male dominated, patriarchal society that overwhelmingly favors men in all positions and all levels of our hierarchy, don't we need feminism to fight it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/25 03:14 AM
1

Sure, but doesn't that prove that we still need feminism?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/25 02:48 AM
2

But doesn't that argument support the image's reasoning as to why we still need feminism?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/25 02:23 AM
14

I think the population statistic is correct. You're right about the rest though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/25 02:19 AM
9

A numerous number of women, especially leftists/progressives, have been hooked by feminism's sales pitch, while knowing nothing about what the movement has actually done (and is doing), or the baselessness of many of its claims. Also critical thinking is at a particular low point at this point in time, and when feminist leaders spout off obviously anti-male rhetoric, it's dismissed much like MAGA supporters when Trump spouts off anti-working class rhetoric. I think one thing that would help is i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/25 02:15 AM
28

I wouldn't go so far as to make that generalization. What you're describing are feminists. Women can be of many different ideologies and/or beliefs. Only some are feminists. Let's not fall into the same idiocy as feminists and assert that a person's sex dictates their beliefs. I would think us LWMA's are far less dogmatic and more science minded than that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/25 11:37 PM
2

Thanks for the link to the book but I'm uncertain what this has to do with what I was asking about...
/r/MensRights08/01/25 05:51 AM
7

Is there a website where all this information is compiled by topic? Or are we stuck with having to look for random reddit posts?
/r/MensRights08/01/25 01:58 AM
13

Do the administrators of this server actively condemn the idea of men as the oppressor class? This is a very serious issue. And I think I speak for many here when I say unless you do so loudly and clearly, you will be treated with suspicion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/24 01:34 AM
2

I think your assessment of men's lib is confused. It's not an independant movement, but an umbella term that encompasses all philosophies and activism addressing the social issues men and boys face--just because some feminist groups call themselves "men's lib" doesn't mean feminism has a monopoly on the movement. And it doesn't mean that MRA and LWMA are separate movements. Saying otherwise is like saying the civil rights movement was a christian movement, as so many christian leaders participat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/24 02:41 AM
1

Well...i wouldn't say wokism is simply "tolerating differences." As you've been pointing out, it's actually quite intolerant. My point though is tribalism and cultism aren't the same thing. There's more to cultism than simply unchallegable assumptions--there needs to be an extremeness to them for example, that makes them anti-social.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/24 05:50 AM
1

I might point out that every group has unchallengable assumptions--a book club assumes that books are worth reading. If everyone challenged that, there'd be no club anymore. Does that make them a cult? I think your assessment is bit too polarized.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/24 07:53 AM
3

I'm pretty certain the reason he's resistant to accepting anything you might tell him about men's issue is because of tribalism. Anything you tell him that contradicts the beliefs of his group is rejected as if he were to accept them, he'd be ostracized. It's the same reason many people won't think critically about numerous issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/24 06:58 AM
0

Well that might be what you think CeleryMan20 believes, but I want to hear it straight from him. But thanks anyway.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/24 11:45 AM
1

I'm having difficulty picturing that. Can you give some examples?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/24 12:21 AM
11

Some more suggestions. In science they try to avoid using labels that place a value-judgment on things. In psychology, they tend to describe harmful behavior as ''anti-social.'' So to align gender roles with psychology, I suggest ''anti-social masculinity'', ''anti-social femininity'', and ''anti-social gender roles'' to encompass them all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 06:57 AM
8

Your first mistake is agreeing with feminism and buying into its Patriarchy Theory conspiracy. Femnism dismisses that women are, and have always been half the ruling class. Although women's positions of authority has been primarily second in command, feminism claims that second in command equates to being no more powerful than a private in the military. And not only that, that lower class men have equal or even superior authority to these women. This is absolutely ridiculous! You can not effecti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/24 05:51 AM
3

Targetting the harmful assumptions that victim blame men (or are just flat out wrong), insuring there can be no effective advocacy for us, is an absolute must. People keep pushing studies, writing articles and discussing in news programs how bad it's gotten for men. But they're either unwilling or too ignorant to challenge the assumptions on both the left and right, as to the cause of these problems, including if the cause is the assumptions themselves. And as long as that's the case, men's issu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/24 05:21 AM
1

Don't date narcissistic women and/or women with personality disorder. Those are the kind of women who monkey branch. You should do some research into the character traits of these kind of women so you can spot the signs. Healthy women have empathy for others and form attachments. Narcissists don't.
/r/MensRights05/10/24 01:34 AM
1

well, there's an argument that historically speaking, societal environments aside, women weren't able to advance to the same degree as men until the invention of proper feminine hygene products. But of course this ignores issues of class, as neoliberal arguments on social issues so often do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/24 04:59 AM
3

That's Neil Degrasse-Tyson. Good quote, and I agree!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/24 03:12 AM
5

More like raised in a trailer, a project or worse still, a homeless shelter...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/24 11:38 PM
3

I see your point, but it wasn't the white man in the image that was in question here, it was the black woman. The assumption that's being made is that it's black women who more disadvantaged in US society than black men. And that's simply not true. But of course any disadvantaged person is deserving of compassion and assistance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/24 11:30 PM
13

You mean like feminists do to men? And how is it acceptable if they do it? 🤔🤔
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/24 02:58 PM
8

Bing's Copilot will provide sources, but you absolutely shouldn't get lazy. Be sure to check them to insure it's not ''hallucinating''.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/24 10:46 AM
1

Are you talking about the entire LWMA subreddit or just this post?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/24 11:32 AM
8

I wish l could believe that but life experience makes me highly skeptical. People in general are poor critical thinkers. Maybe the rich gamble less as a serious endeavor as they're educated about money, but the less educated gamble away, thinking they'll get rich. I do agree though, that those stuck in poverty are more incentivized to gamble than those who aren't. But I'd need to see some statistics before I draw any conclusions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/24 02:25 AM
1

But you're still saying it's certain demographics that are spreading hate, implying queer women across the board, and that's just not true. On top of that, I think it's far more useful to address misandry in general rather than any specific demographic that's doing it. Maybe it's true that most misandry stems from queer women, but not all of it. By targetting misandry in general you target all of it. By targetting just queer women, you only get them and everyone else is left off the hook. And th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/24 06:49 AM
1

If hearing the truth causes them to dig their heels in and become more radicalized, then obviously they can't be reasoned with. Some people are simply enemies and there's nothing that can be done about that. They must dealt with like the monsters that they are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/24 04:41 AM
1

The problem with using that analogy is the public views men as the oppressor, women as the oppressed, even if it's not true. Years of conservative and feminist indoctrination has shaped public perception. So that analogy might be effective amongst activists who are educated and know better, but it rings hollow amongst the general public who are horrifically misinformed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/24 04:35 AM
1

I probably could if I looked into it, but don't really pay much attention to the views of celebrities unless they make a big deal about them, and/or make headlines because of them. And of course I don't seek out blatantly misandrist social commentators--I'm not interested in torturing myself. And you might be right that there are more misandrist queer women than straight women, at least as percent of their respective demographics, but that still doesn't mean they shoud be stigmatized as man-hate…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/24 03:28 AM
4

I'm sorry but I hate to disagree. I've known plenty of man-hating straight women feminists. It's not simply queer women that are the problem. And I've also know queer women who aren't man-haters, so it's not fair to blame queer women across the board.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/24 02:23 PM
2

I can have sympathy for how a person who's posted such content has suffered, while still showing zero tolerance for them spewing hate and propaganda. Just because they suffered, doesn't give them the right to make others suffer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/24 05:39 AM
1

No, I wouldn't. I have no idea what the numbers are like. I'm not against however, challenging stereotypes of men pushed by both feminists and conservatives. And I think that addresses the issue of phobic queer women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/24 05:34 AM
1

I understand. You could use a better analogy though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/24 01:04 AM
2

I don't know if that's true, although I know many queer women can be phobic of men. But it's unhealthy to make sweeping generalizations like that. It's better to judge people individually.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/24 01:00 AM
4

What do you mean, can you elaborate? How can we use women's fear to our benefit?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 01:44 PM
7

I haven't seen it but I read about it, and I know it pushes the notion that most of the world's ills stems from men in positions of power. And the way they recommend fixing it is to replace those men with women. Such a worldview is horrifically simplified, misandrist and female supremacist. And the public gobbled it up in record numbers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 01:42 PM
3

We have to push back against this perception. Unfortunately this oppressor/oppressed dichotomy is pushed by the mainstream media and the universities, who have a monopoly on the narrative. I see we have no choice but to fight them. They're responsible for keeping the public ignorant and/or misinformed on the subject of gender issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 01:34 PM
2

I do challenge it. For this post I was asking for help as I wanted to challenge what was being said in the image, but felt stumped. It's crazy how reactive people are in this group now, and how quickly they jump to negative conclusions about a commentor, when they do something as little as point out the reality of how the public perceives men vs women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 11:49 AM
13

Outside of a very few small circles (that I would say are too far gone anyway), nobody cares about the oppressor vs. oppressed dichotomy, it's a very flawed and simplistic one that's always binary and doesn't take circumstances into account. I wish I could believe that but I think the success of The Barbie Movie dispells the idea that nobody cares, especially when it comes to gender dynamics. At my own local theater, when the movie came out, there were literally lines snaking around the block to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 11:35 AM
5

But the mainstream narrative is women are oppressed, men are the oppressor. Even if that's anything but true, that is the propaganda we are facing down, with a vigilant army of people who believe it. There were literally lines of people snaking around the block to get their dose of propaganda at my local theater, when The Barbie Movie came out. If we don't take this seriously, our movement is destined to failure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 11:16 AM
11

I don't disagree with that, but public perception doesn't match reality. That's what I was trying to point out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 11:05 AM
4

I understand what you mean and totally agree, but the problem is women aren't seen as oppressors by society, they're seen as the oppressed. So in your analogy, society would identify women with blacks, not whites.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 10:08 AM
17

I agree with what you said about egalitarianism, but I see some issues with your analogy. The problem is men are seen by the public as oppressors, while women are seen as oppressed. So for them, comparing a woman in a room full of men to a white person in a room full of ethnic people, makes little sense. The woman isn't the oppressor, she's a member of the oppressed group. So for that analogy to make sense, the public would need to believe women are the oppressors and men are oppressed first. An…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 10:03 AM
2

Again, manipulative women aren't all women. Making such generalizations does nothing help the problems in our society, and instead helps to foster hatred, the same tactics used by feminists. You think you're helping but you're not. Stop.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 02:23 AM
6

There are progressive and regressive anti-feminists. Guess which ones the mainstream media gives all the attention?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/24 08:47 AM
9

Not to rain on your parade but manipulative women and women in general aren't the same thing. Let's not fall into the same trap as feminists and start stereotyping an entire gender so we can legitimatize hatred. This group was forrmed to seperate itself from the regular mens rights groups specifically for that reason. Hate feminists all you want, hate misandrists all you want, but women as a whole are off limits.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/24 04:36 AM
9

Or pretend they're more discriminated against than they are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/24 04:23 AM
26

I'm all for incouraging women in STEM, but afaik women being discouraged from the field is a myth. That might have been true several decades ago, but not anymore.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/24 01:31 AM
23

If it was written a while ago, it's info sorely outdated, and yet it's still being circulated as if it's still relevant, then it's purpose is to perpetuate a myth of non-existent female victimhood and male priviledge. And to falsely believe in priviledge and victimhood is a way to enforce favoritism and neglect. There's no justice in it. It only insures the ''rich get richer and the poor poorer'' for lack of a better phrase.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/24 01:25 AM
18

It makes many, many assumptions about what men experience and the differences in treatment between men and women. And I believe that warrants a response.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/24 01:04 AM
0

I won't make generalizations like that. To do that would make me no better than a feminist, who makes generalizations about men. I want a better world, not simply revenge.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 12:03 AM
3

I don't know about that. With The Barbie movie having been as successful as it was, I don't think the feminist movement is running dry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 01:21 PM
20

But it's not specifically women who hate men, but feminists or misandrists who are often but not exclusively women (ie white knights, male feminists, etc.).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/24 11:14 AM
22

Tell them the first thing any supremacist movement does is say that prejudice against the target of their prejudice doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 06:32 AM
1

The problem with this argument though, is that blacks are seen as an oppressed group, while men aren't. So anything said ill of blacks is considered to be punching down. Men are considered to be privileged though, regardless of evidence to the contrary. So anything said ill of them is considered punching up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/24 11:33 AM
2

The common argument spouted by feminists when confronted with such facts is "patriarchy hurts men too." But I agree.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/24 10:47 PM
15

The problem is blacks aren't seen as the oppressor, but men are. So if you attack blacks, it's considered to be punching down, while attacking men is punching up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/24 10:31 PM
4

Yes, that's the document. And if after reading it, you characterize my summary as an exaggeration, it seems we can no longer have an honest discussion. If making monstrous, sweeping generalizations about a demographic, painting all members as villains, isn't declaring them as the enemy, then what is? You're dishonest and have an agenda.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 11:22 PM
3

How about one of the very first feminist documents, the declaration of sentiments, outright declaring men the enemies of women? It's in the second or third paragraph of the text. How about modern feminist poster-child Bell Hooks, in her essay Understanding Patriarchy, proclaiming that all men, no matter how egalitarian at first, will eventually become supporters of the patriarchy? Both texts are readily found online. Just do a web search, you'll find them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 06:42 AM
1

You might be right, but there's still a chance it could be a smash hit like Barbie. And if it is, are we going to do nothing but write a few hit pieces like with The Barbie Movie, then let it go? What will it take to actually get us out in the street and bring awareness to our cause??
/r/MensRights07/01/24 08:01 AM
1

It depends on how well it panders to feminist viewers. If done well, it could turn them out in droves, regardless of alienating traditional Star Wars fans. Is it a longshot? Probably. But nothing is impossible, especially these days with our highly politicised society.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 12:26 PM
1

Yeah, but that could be changing at least for the new film.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 11:50 AM
1

And a feminist star wars movie wouldn't be??
/r/MensRights05/01/24 11:53 AM
1

It's not simply retired people who are going to see these films--you think it was just seniors who went to see the Barbie Movie?? And I'm not talking going and protesting just any film. I mean key films like The Barbie Movie. That was a seriously missed opportunity for our movement.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 04:06 AM
1

Yeah, but what if this turns out to be another Barbie movie, with people lined up around the block to see it and a billion dollars in profit? This could happen. And I don't see any men's rights organizations taking issue with mass scale demonization of men, especially when it happens in culturally iconic media. There should be protests outside of theaters amongst other things, but there isn't.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 03:00 AM
1

Not anymore, that's for sure. It seems it's gotten even more extreme in recent years.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 08:51 PM
0

Many of the feminists I've spoken to over the years have said what I did about patriarchy, which has lead me to argue with them over why they're calling it "patriarchy", as both men and women are responsible for the creation of the system. Some feminists though, might argue that men are at fault, and women hold no responsibility. And it sounds like those are the types you've primarily dealt with, who go even further and blame men for anything and everything, including those injustices commited b…
/r/MensRights23/12/23 08:54 AM
1

Feminists often like to say though, that the biggest supporters of patriarchy are women. So this simply confirms the suspicions of those feminists who are more inclined to acknowledge women's agency in the construction of our society, even if their conclusions are wrongheaded.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 07:23 AM
-8

Women or misandrists/feminists? They aren't the same thing.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 11:32 AM
9

Bcause that's not all women, that's feminists and misandrists. "Women" and "feminists/misandrists" aren't the same thing. Don't make the same logical fallacy as feminists and confuse a demographic with those who hold a specific prejudice (ie "men" and "misogynists"). They legislate and create policy now based off this idiocy, and it's ruining society. We don't need more of it.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 11:48 PM
1

I agree that demonization and villainization of men is dangerous, harmful and wrong. And that it has social consequences that affect everyone, not just men. And that the lack of consequences for those who push sexism against men is horrific. But I don't agree it's more or less harmful to society than if it were being done to women. Both men and women contribute to society in equal ways, and if either are oppressed, everyone suffers. There is nothing particularly special about either sex. They're…
/r/MensRights26/10/23 11:05 PM
0

Most men avoid danger as well, it's just a larger percentage of their demographic engage in risky behavior compared to women. And men are expected to be protectors and have expendability cross cultures, but the overwhelming majority avoid putting their lives and well-being at risk where possible.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 10:24 AM
3

That's social conditioning. Men only put themselves in dangerous situations becaused they're shamed if they don't. And the original feminists did in fact put themselves in dangerous situations. They engaged in acts of terrorism to win the vote for women. Modern feminists however, are spineless.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 09:11 AM
15

We're talking feminists, not women, and I would say not really. They're all bark and no bite. Look what happened with the loss of Roe v Wade. Why didn't feminists occupy the supreme court? Why weren't there riots and protests blocking major avenues of commerce? The loss of the right to choose went out with a wimper, not a bang. Feminists are weak.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 03:20 AM
7

No, women dominate in healthcare. All the hospitals and clinics will shut down. For them to be mislead like this really isn't good.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 10:12 AM
4

Not that I'm doubtful but can we get a source on those statistics? Without reliable sources this won't be taken seriously when shared with skeptics.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 10:44 PM
41

The first thing you need to know is feminists believe men are the oppressor class. Next you should know that menslib is a feminist sympathizing subreddit that advocates for men based on that perspective. Now that you know, the question becomes what kind of advocacy can you expect of a group who believe that in all cases, men are the oppressor? It's like a group who advocates for blacks that sides with the klan--the only thing you can learn is how to be a better victim. Don't listen to women who …
/r/MensRights30/09/23 01:19 AM
1

What study would that be? Was there some study involved in either this post or the one you linked to? I'm extremely confused. Are you sure you're responding to the right user? I was talking about Bell Hooks before you responded.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 11:25 AM
1

Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't notice until just now you're one of the mods here. I see now it says "mod" at the end of your username. I hope you didn't find my last comment disrespectful, it wasn't my intent. I was only trying to say that I encourage people to police themselves. But if you have a strict enforcement policy where all enfractions must be reported, I will comply with that from now on.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 11:04 AM
1

I'm not sure why you wanted me to see this but thanks I guess.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 10:49 AM
1

I prefer to give people warnings so they can correct their behavior on their own. I don't like calling in authority unless absolutely necessary. As you can see, the user deleted their own comment.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 10:25 AM
1

Women's bodies also tend to be smaller than men's, and intelligence is determined by neuron to body mass ratio--that means they're comparable to men. Hooks' issue wasn't that she was a woman, it's that she was a feminist. And feminism is a mind disease suffered by both men and women. Stop with the misogyny. You make MRA's look like bigots.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 10:13 AM
4

Understanding how women suffer from abusive men and supporting them is a good thing, yes. But so is attacking and disolving female supremacist lies and propaganda, designed to enslave men and make them second class citizens. And embracing misandry, regardless of how mild, supports neither cause.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 10:01 PM
5

I'm not sure how Bell Hooks helps as she made it quite clear in her essay "Understanding Patriarchy", that all men are corrupt. She asserts that they're either supporters of the patriarchy, or if aren't already, will inevitabley succumb to the patriarchy and become supporters, therefor suspect. She, like all feminists, was a misandrist. Nothing else.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 09:32 PM
2

I'd say a good way to know if a guy is wasting his time with a lady is if she asks to see his bank balance.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 08:02 PM
1

They have both the institution and the crowd on their side though. You know this is war, right? It's why I, as a disabled man, keep most of the criticism to the internet. The anonymity protects me from retaliation, as both my disabilities and the social class that stems from them, prevent me from properly defending myself. And even then I've been threatened with violence by people demanding that I reveal my identity and meet them in person.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 12:29 AM
2

I will say that if you're vocal in your criticism, and openly call out feminism for what it is, a female supremacist movement, it's going to be called "attacking" anyway.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 12:08 AM
2

If you want them to take accountability then in fact you don't support feminism. What you support is women's rights. Feminism is, and alway has been about gender war, and women winning the war. It's never been about rights.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 11:53 PM
2

That doesn't mean it's wrong however, to attack feminism for its dogma, and hold its adherents accountable for their actions. Misandry is an intolerable evil and should be wiped off the face of the earth, no different than misogyny or any other form of prejudice.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 11:49 PM
17

The movie's made a billion dollars so far. I don't think most people are seeing it from the perspective you are, they agree with its intended perspective. The world is extremely misandristic now. We've got a very serious problem on our hands.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 06:19 AM
1

No, though I don't doubt that they exist. My skepticism lies in whether they represent the views of the majority of young American women.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 10:10 AM
1

I would rather see a study on that than make a potentially harmful, sweeping generalization. Things like feminism tend to be rooted in party politics, and the studies I've seen for my country, the US, show the majority of the populace, but in particular young people, are disenfranchised with both parties.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 08:28 AM
2

Actually it's been that way since the beginning. One of the very first feminist documents is The Declaration of Sentiments. It was written during womens suffrage in the 19th century. The third paragraph openly declares men the sworn enemies of women. Then the duluth model was implemented by feminists in the US in 1991, during the second wave of feminism. It arrests and jails men who are victims of violence at the hands of women. Feminism is a hate movement rooted in bourgeois gender war. It's pu…
/r/MensRights19/08/23 08:18 AM
1

Actually I think most feminists are women who were either actually oppressed, or at least THINK they were oppressed by a man or group of men at some point in their life. And instead of coming to the conclusion that SOME men are oppressors, they've concluded that ALL MEN are oppressors. And said conclusion is the basis of their irrational, secular religious cult.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 08:06 AM
5

Hate to point this out to you, but this IS r/MensRights...
/r/MensRights18/08/23 10:06 PM
1

I mean yes but that is literally impossible to know without reading her mind ahead of time. I cannot know if she is open to being approached and I cannot know if I am her kind of guy. You don't have to read their minds. Try making eye contact and see what happens. You'll know if they're open to you approaching them by the way they respond. What do you mean by overzealous? I don't understand. I met a woman at a political group once who I was just starting to get to know, and was hitting it off wi…
/r/MensRights12/08/23 03:43 AM
1

Per women being open to socializing, there's still a part of me thinking of the "women don't want to be approached" message blared at men. Gonna have to get in practice after years of covid isolation, but that's something I could see myself doing. I think it's more like women don't want to be approached if they aren't interested. If they're open to dating and you're the right kind of guy, they want to talk to you. They can even be overzealous sometimes so you have to be careful. It's all about t…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 08:55 PM
1

I know what you mean, I used to attend some skeptics meetings and it was the same. Thankfully I wasn't hoping to meet any women while I was there (and the few who were there, even if they were single, suffered from the issue I described in my earlier comment). What about science museums? At those you have both the attendees and the staff. I know it's a bit more awkward as they aren't places formally setup for socializing, so it would require some assertiveness. But you might find that women are …
/r/MensRights11/08/23 07:21 AM
1

I'll say that from my own personal experience, house parties tend to be better places to meet women. But I'll also say as a geek, if the host is a geek man, it'll absolutely be a sausage fest--maybs a few guys will bring their gf's or wives, but that's about it. I don't know if you were just looking to vent or if you were looking for suggestions, but if it's the latter, have you tried looking at meetup? Otherwise, sorry it's been so frustrating, buddy.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 03:05 AM
2

Sorry to hear you haven't had much luck, that's rough. And I think it really depends on the social function. Sounds like the ones you've gone to don't have many women. To me that would tell me I need to recalibrate (if possible), and try and find different functions aligned with my beliefs. I will say as a geek, I don't put much faith in meeting women at functions related to my interests. They tend to be sausage fests and if you find any single women at them (rare), competition is stiff. Quality…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 12:46 AM
4

I absolutely agree. The best way to meet women imho, is to go to in-person social functions where you can meet women who share your core values--ie political, religious/spiritual, philosophical, etc. The apps are are a nightmare for men. If you can last long enough to actually get a date, you'll more than likely get one with the same kind of woman you'd meet at one of these functions. It's faster, easier and less insanity inducing just to go to one of them.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 11:25 PM
1

Secularism and secular humanism aren't related--you're talking apples and oranges. Secular Humanism is a very specific philosophy that advocates morality based on secular principles, while secularism is a society run by non-religious principles. Secular Humanism can exist in both religious and secular societies, and is even advocated by religious people who live in multi-religious societies. In such societies, secular humanism allows debate over ethics without having to debate the conflicting sc…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 09:08 PM
1

What do you mean? Secular humanism has never been tried, period--not even a corrupt form of it. It's never been advocated by anyone other than scientists. No political movement has embraced and pushed it--not that I'm aware of anyway.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 01:37 AM
2

Unfortunately no. What's being pushed is the reverse racism, misandry and hatred for biology that is postmodern intersectional feminism. It's pseudo-humanism at best, and fascism with a new coat of paint at worst.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 06:32 PM
1

Have you looked into secular humanism? Just a thought.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 08:00 PM
22

That they suffer far, far less than women do in modern western society.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 10:15 PM
1

My apologies. I was certain that I recently read an article about this happening in Canada, but I think I confused it with the incident in Australia, as I can't find anything when I do a search. My mistake. I've since deleted my comment.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 05:47 AM
4

Can't we just make our own kbin.social/l/leftwingmaleadvocates or would that also get us banned?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/23 06:33 AM
1

I think the term you're looking for is "cougars" and I'm sure! And yes, you can find examples of similar behavior in all populaces--no one has a monopoly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/22 10:19 AM
2

The point was to emphasize that it's not a behavior that women have a monopoly on. I agree though that men, regardless of sexuality, tend to focus on looks rather than status. But to say gay men don't look for sugar daddies would be a falsehood.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/22 02:41 AM
7

This article exemplifies the more conservative, gender warring demographic of women though, and doesn't give the whole picture. If you're basing your view of straight women on just this, your view is going to be blindsided. Like men, women can be kind and caring people who view men as equals, not simply competitors or a source of resources. Granted, such women are far fewer in number than those who lean more toward the conservative/gender warring side. But egalitarian men are also few in number …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/22 09:50 AM
2

That's the propaganda, it's nothing but lies. Their actions speak otherwise. The implementation of the Duluth Model amongst other policies is proof of that.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:46 AM
3

I guess it's too late to point out that $2M barely even addresses the issue, whether it ignores male homelessness or not. Very few will be served. This is more virtue signaling than trying to solve any problems.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 07:10 AM
1

Right, it's men's rights sub, not a male supremacist sub, which you've confused it for. And you've done nothing of the sort as far as taxes are concerned. The only thing you've established is you, personally don't like taxes for arbitrary reasons, and that you don't like that taxes are spent more on women than men. But you haven't established that life would be better for men if all the services taxes pay for were taken away. There's no cause and effect in your arguments, they're totally detache…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 09:48 PM
1

You're confusing "women" with feminists--they're not the same thing! And in fact you're using the same tactics as feminists--equating a gender to an ideology. And I already established that arbitrarily paying less taxes isn't necessarily better. Or do you think men are better off without transit, police, fire departments and countless other services that keep life civilized, along with taxes that insure the majority of men aren't living hand to mouth? You don't know what you're talking about. Yo…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 09:38 PM
1

Oh right, like anyone enjoys being forced into a position and is content to just stay there, even though there's a effectively a gun against their head. You're not thinking! And not all women behave the way you describe. Just because a few do doesn't mean they all do. You're making the same kind of generalizations about women that feminists do about men, making your conclusions no better. If you're not willing to account for all variables in your analysis, then there's nothing to be gained from …
/r/MensRights31/08/22 09:23 PM
1

What are you saying?? That forcing women into a position of dependency where they just use men to survive is better for men? Seriously?? Having a society where the genders are pitted against each other does NOT make for a better place for men! In such a society, there's almost no room for friendship or cooperation amongst the sexes. A society where there's more competition and more enemies doesn't make for a better place for men. And what you propose also shows a pathological lack of empathy for…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 08:52 PM
1

I don't agree. In democratic nations taxes pay for transit, fire departments, police departments, healthcare, social services and numerous other services that are of benefit to men both directly and indirectly. Nations with minimal or no taxation are tyrannies that have no guarantees for any services, especially those that guarantee men their human rights. What you're claiming is akin to saying that Afghanistan is better for men than Norway--no it isn't, not if you believe lifespan and quality o…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 03:27 PM
1

And we can engage in activism without fear of being murdered or imprisoned in democratic countries. That's another plus for men over dictatorships. And I'd rather advocate for pro-men taxation and sane taxation rather than arbitrary repeal or lowering of taxes. If you study economics, taxes have a time and place. They're not all just arbitrary methods of levying sources of revenue. There are different kinds of taxes that are used in different ways, that have effects on the economy that can be be…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 02:52 PM
1

I will say that in democratic countries, they don't execute people, including men, for apostasy from the state religion, or for atheism. So if you're trying to make the case for men and dictatorships, it's already starting to look rather pale. If taxes being used on women instead of men is anti-male, execution for not conforming to the state religion is even more so. Men aren't murdered in democratic countries that vote for taxes to benefit women more so than men, as most of them have religious …
/r/MensRights31/08/22 02:15 PM
1

So it seems there's not enough information on Saudi Arabia to make a conclusive statement on how taxes are being spent in that country. But then again it's only one Islamic country. There are many more, including ones outside of the middle east. And there are other countries that aren't Islamic, but treat women as second class citizens or property. And my greatest concern is for human rights. There is no religious freedom in Saudi Arabia. Atheism and apostasy are punished by death as according t…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:46 PM
1

I don't know for certain, but I would think islamic countries or other ones that treat women like property, spend most public funds on men rather than women. Women are second class citizens after all. And I would suspect this to be the case in any region where women are second class citizens, historical to present.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 12:29 PM
1

Yeah, I understand that position. But it requires agreeing with the idea that society has and will always have less empathy for men than for women, Many of people's attitudes are period based and also regional. Things can change a lot depending on those factors, making whether or not taxes are anti-male rather relative. It wouldn't be fair to say they are across the board.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 11:51 AM
1

They might be anti-male in the US system, but it's more about implementation than their simple existence. If taxes went to help men as much as they did women, would they still be anti-male? If men's issues were taken as seriously by society as women's, and taxes were used to address those issues, would it be anti-male? The generalization by the OP dismisses too many variables to be considered a viable argument. Taxes are inherently neutral. Whether or not they're anti-male depends on how they're…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:22 AM
16

I can't answer for CinemaCrayne, but you're right to ask them that question. I would say actual progressives are people who support human rights for everyone across the board. But you'll have to wait for their answer to know how they define it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/22 09:14 AM
2

And now you flat out lie. Domestic abuse remains about equal between men and women when it comes to inter-partner abuse. When it comes to children, it was faultily recorded that men were the primary abusers of children, as men are stronger and more likely to leave cuts and bruises than women. But when children and witnesses were interviewed, it was found that women had a slight majority as perpetrators of physical abuse. And as you're now lying, it's pretty obvious you have an agenda, and it has…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 02:32 PM
2

You forgot to mention that feminists in Canadian government blocked all requests to build the first battered male shelter, leading to the founder's suicide. They also implemented the Deleuth Model here in the US, making it so male victims of domestic violence at the hands of women, get arrested when calling the police, not the female perpetrator. And the family courts here in the US side with women 90% of the time, regardless of their provable fitness to raise children. Sounds like to me feminis…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 01:35 PM
2

Feminists only state that when pushed in a corner, otherwise it's simply men vs women. And women only become "the patriarchy" when one takes the center stage in the news, otherwise it's still just men who are the oppressors. Feminists are anything but clear on this issue. Regardless of huge numbers of women supporting oppressive systems, even making up the majority of some organizations, feminists only address women's participation when forced. And then they have their endless excuses ie "women …
/r/MensRights27/08/22 11:34 AM
1

Exactly. According to NPR, women are even the largest opposers of abortion--there are more conservative women who oppose it than even conservative men. But just like feminists equate being a feminists to being a woman, they equate attacks on women's rights to men. So even while it's other women tearing down women's reproductive rights, that fact is ignored and men are given blame instead.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 06:11 AM
2

They don't specify beyond just women. What constitutes for brains though, is subjective.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 06:01 AM
5

But you have to read between the lines. What they mean when they say "women" actually means "feminists." If a woman was in power who was a social conservative and believed traditional gender roles should be enforced by law, that whole "better off lead by women" narrative would come crumbling down. oh, she doesn't count? Then just what exactly constitutes a "woman"? Don't buy into their propaganda, when they say "women" they don't really mean it. They mean feminists.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 12:59 PM
1

What are you even arguing? At first you were stating that it's women that are to blame, not feminists. Now you're saying it's feminists, not women? You can't choose two contradicting stances at the same time. Now you're just being a troll. Go away.
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/22 11:52 AM
0

FYI: Ideologies (like feminism) cannot and do not exist without the demographics (principally women) that create, promote, and perpetrate said ideologies... How is it that you cant understand that fact? Your analysis doesn't encompass or acknowledge that there are women who DON'T believe in feminism--in fact there are even women who are anti-feminists. And your analysis doesn't acknowledge that there are male feminists as well. By trying to place a specific demographic on an ideology, you aliena…
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/22 06:34 AM
1

So maybe what you're getting at is female chauvinism is to blame, which includes feminism? Though it needs to be said that not all women are chauvinists--it's the chauvinists who need to be called out, not women across the board. I do understand though, that gender war is rooted in our culture. And some things people do not because they believe in them, but to unconsciously fit into the crowd. But when it's on that scale, what needs to happen is to build awareness. We can start calling out the c…
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/22 03:54 AM
2

That might be true, but it's still feminists who pushed for gender supremacy, not women across the board. Put responsibility where responsibility is do. Otherwise it's making the same mistake as feminists, and that's equating a person's sex/gender to an ideology--a person's sex doesn't dictate a person's beliefs. This is proven empirically.
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/22 03:31 AM
4

You can benefit from something without agreeing with or advocating for it, can't you? And there are already anti-feminist women who feel revulsion at the idea that they're benefiting as both men in general, and those they care about suffer. But based on your stance, they should also be lumped into the same group and shamed. How is that productive? It's the ideology that's the issue, not one's demographics.
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/22 01:57 AM
3

And yet if you start claiming that to be a woman means to automatically belong to an ideology or philosophy, then that makes you no better than feminists. They make the same claims about men. To be of a certain sex or gender does NOT mean that a person carries specific beliefs about sex or gender. This is the mistake that both feminists and conservatives make, and is the basis for gender war. Call out the ideologies, leave the demographics alone.
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/22 01:48 AM
18

I would agree, but only so long as responsibility is taken off "women" and placed on feminists. It's feminists who push gender war, not women!
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/22 04:22 PM
2

Actually there's medically diagnosed transgenderism. People who have it suffer from gender dysphoria, and under MRI scans, have brains that appear to function more like the opposite sex of their physiology. What these people suffer is very real, however they represent less than one half of one percent of the population. The current transgender culture that you're taking issue with, has nothing to do with actual transgenderism. These people are posers. They don't suffer gender dysphoria and they'…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 04:15 AM
3

But there are right-wing MRA's who bash women and argue on behalf of men almost entirely on ideological grounds, as well as the feminist men's lib which hamstrings men while doing the same. It's the reason I prefer this sub to other subs or groups that support men on the web. Really, without context, the OP is extremely out of place.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/22 03:31 AM
1

No idea what this has to do with men's issues. Shouldn't this have been posted in r/science instead?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/22 02:48 PM
1

You're right about the division, and postmodern identity politics, of which feminism is a part of, is being used exactly for that purpose. You can see for yourself in the report by The Independent below, how one organizing attempt was broken. This is exactly why our pseudo-socially left-wing, economically right-wing, corporate fascist rulers, otherwise known as the neoliberal establishment (how's that for "just" buzzwords)have indoctrinated the public with such politics. "Breaking Unions With th…
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 03:09 AM
1

No, I actually understand feminism. You're still in denial--either that or are an agent provocateur who's paid by the neoliberal establishment to spread propaganda. The universities are in the hip pockets of all the corporations, and humanities departments teach nothing but feminism. And that's not a coincidence.
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 12:56 AM
2

Right, because the majority of men who, in the west during that period, owned no property, couldn't vote, were impoverished wage slaves and indentured servants, had no rights, and were cannon fodder in wars for the ruling class, who were more than half women, then the majority of oppressors must have been men. That's about as rational as flat earth theory. The only way feminism explains this discrepancy is by stating that victimized lower-class men, from antiquity to present, support such system…
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/22 10:16 PM
3

That's pure revisionism. 200 years of literature, crimes against boys & men, bigoted policy & legislation, and rewriting history the same as you are now, disprove such sentiment. The Suffragettes, during the historical period that's been falsely labelled women's suffrage, even wrote in their movement's constitution, that men are the absolute enemies and oppressors of women. They didn't differentiate between men, and neither have more modern "progressive" feminist authors such as Bell Hooks. In H…
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/22 09:03 PM
9

The experiences of these transmen was shared by feminist author Nora Vincent 15 years ago. For 18 months she went undercover as a man to write the book "Self-Made Man". She appeared on Stephen Colbert and other tv shows, talking about her experience and how humbling it was for her as a feminist. She was promptly ignored. A few years later she was accused of being a transphobe for conducting her experiment and ostracized. She's since faded into obscurity. Is anyone surprised? https://en.wikipedia…
/r/MensRights21/06/22 06:15 PM
3

You're only fucked if you sit back and accept it. If you refuse to fight and choose to be a doormat, don't be surprised when the boot stomps on your throat.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 09:03 AM
25

I know this was intended as a joke, but as so many men actually think this way, I'm going to answer as if it was serious. First mistake, assuming that being a woman is the same as belonging to an ideology. This is wrong. Women are a demographic of a sex or gender that adheres to a wide range of ideologies, including but not limited to both feminism and anti-feminism. It is NOT an ideology in of itself. And for some women, if you're a feminist, the two of you will never agree. Second mistake, the…
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 04:50 PM
10

All of this is because feminism isn't about women's rights or equality, it's about gender war. And it's about women winning the war. It uses the progressive movement simply as a vehicle to herd people who are concerned with social issues, into feminists' fight for supremacy. It does this by using a classic con artist strategy of preying on people's sympathy, to deceive them out of their money or power. And in this case it's by convincing them that by joining their movement, they're helping to ge…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/22 06:28 AM
1

Yeah, the mainstream left has its mythologies surrounding victim status, which excludes men, but they can be debated. And yes, there's disagreement and infighting amongst the mainstream that still manages to exclude men. But even then not everyone on the left agrees with them. And yes, this group is small, but there's also r/Egalitarianism, r/antifeminists, r/stupidpol, and we're just talking reddit here. Discord has the Men's Human Rights and Humanism servers. There's a lot of people out there …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/22 01:36 PM
2

Sorry you got banned. And not defending menslib as they're a bunch of bigots. Just in general you gotta be careful around antisemitism as it's still a highly charged issue. If you're talking specifically about how say, Palestinians continue to be persecuted by Israel, but jews as a whole aren't zionists who support Israel's apartheid state, and are undeserving of people's anger, you've got a point. But without making it abundantly clear as I just did, you're potentially stepping on a landmine. A…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/22 04:34 AM
1

It depends on how you're defining "socialism." Marxists try to claim a monopoly on the term and go around calling everybody "comrade," whether they're progressives who want to be identified with Marxism or not. Some people simply don't know better though, so I try to educate them rather than slam them. And you're right, the left is not Marxist or feminist, nor is socialism Marxism. The left is concerned with justice and human rights with many schools of thought on this subject, some of which are…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/22 04:23 AM
5

Men's lib doesn't care. They support patriarchy theory, and also have openly gaslit male victims of domestic violence in defense of the Duluth model. They, and anyone defending the feminist narrative, have to be exposed for their non-humanist, non-egalitarian, sociopathic lack of empathy for men, and called out and protested for their regressive stances. As if support for the Duluth model and indifference toward MGM didn't give themselves away. Feminists, both male and female, can be shamed thou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/22 03:22 PM
2

I just get the impression buddy, that you're allowing the loudest members to steal the narrative. The anti-authoritarian types are pretty chill, though have a tendency to go along with the crowd or are alienated like many of us, and haven't found a home. It's not all lefties across the board. Look at us, don't we count?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/22 11:38 AM
6

I don't think it's that they don't care, it's that they're either confused or too frightened to speak up. The extremists rule the roost now and people are afraid of being labelled a bigot and ostracized. The culture is toxic. We probably need groups to intercept left wing events who aren't afraid of the bullies, and are willing to fight them on the issue of men's human rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/22 10:51 AM
5

actually I get the impression that most aren't that extreme on any of the issues. It's just they let the loudest members go unchallenged.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/22 10:30 AM
1

I've felt that way my entire life. I've always been a staunch supporter of human rights, but the lefts inability or unwillingness to question the assumptions of Marx or ferminism and the horrors of both, has left me without any sort of community surrounding my most core beliefs. Thankfully there's places like r/Egalitarianism now, and 10 years ago I discovered Georgism. But most of the communities for people with these kind of beliefs are online. And over the decades Georgism has fallen into obs…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/22 07:11 AM
7

Don't let the radicals represent the entirety of the left. Obviously they have the loudest voice during this period but they aren't everyone. Your proof is right here in this group, r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates. Our voices count too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/22 06:52 AM
7

Then the issue is corruption in government. If you refuse to address that problem directly, and instead recommend a workaround that's little more than turning everything into a witch-hunt that believes all accusers, then obviously you don't believe in justice. You'd prefer the hysterical conditions of the Salem Witch Trials or the French Revolution--and remember, the man who invented the guillotine for the French Revolution was also executed by his own invention. If you think your own head won't…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 06:16 AM
11

The fight for women's human and civil rights is inherently a good thing, but don't confuse that with feminism. Feminism was a paranoid, conspiracy based hate movement from the very start. The Declaration of Sentiments that was signed by suffragettes during women's suffrage, declared all men the enemies of women. And every right that's been gained for women since, has given them superior rights to men--all of the freedom, none of the responsibility. They also fought successfully to strip men of t…
/r/MensRights11/05/22 03:11 AM
13

But it's not about female victims actually, it's about portraying men as predators of women so they have an excuse to punish men, and reward women at men's expense. When women act predatory of other women, feminists don't care. It's about gender war, and women must be the victors.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 05:13 AM
3

This next week will be very important. It seems like the court of public opinion is about to rule. If JD loses, it is over for men. If JD, spending years and millions, cannot find justice, what hope os there for us? And that attitude is the actual problem. Where there's a will, there's a way. Losing hope and giving up are the real enemies. But here you are, trying to discourage people with a "last chance!" story. If you can't fight anymore then GTFO. But if you try and drag us down with you, the…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 06:14 AM
1

You gotta find women offline who share your core values, man. Try anything that has a community surrounding it that's based in something your passionate about (social clubs for enthusiasts, charity events/volunteer work, political issues, church, etc.). You're far more likely to find women you personally click with that way. And for chicks, it's all about the emotional connection. The ones you click with are the ones you can have. Then it's just a choice of picking the hottest of the bunch.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 09:23 AM
2

Nah, just abort it if it's a feminist. Sex doesn't determine actions or beliefs. That it does is how feminists think. And that's what we want to be rid of.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:23 PM
18

Too bad there's no scan that can tell you if the child will turn out feminist.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 09:00 AM
1

I'd say capitalism is a *human* rights issue, not gender specific. I'm with you that we need to free ourselves from it along with *all* authoritarian systems, including communism. But I believe issues specific to certain demographics can and will remain, even when our socio-economic systems are no longer pure tyranny. They just won't exist to the horrific extremes that they do now.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 03:18 PM
1

That image condemns women, not feminists. Feminists as a demographic are irrational, women however, aren't pinned down. To declare that they are is to make the same irrational mistake as feminists--being a man isn't a collection of behaviors or to mean belonging to an ideology, and neither is being a woman. You can't rationally classify a sex/gender in that manner.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:03 PM
2

I tend to differentiated myself from right-wing and/or misogynist MRA's, who are openly hostile to women. I think it's helpful to make a distinction, even possibly giving ourselves a new title altogether such as LWMA's, which is what this thread on reddit is called.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/22 08:38 AM
2

Are you certain of that? Let's put in perspective, what if it were happening to women? It would overwhelmingly be called misogyny and the news would be ablaze with it, with humanities departments at universities having dedicated studies to female disposability, and protests on and off campus. But none of that's happening, and we're even calling it something else, in this case "apathy," because it's happening to men. It's absolutely misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 10:08 AM
2

I'm surprised this has to be pointed out as you would think it would be obvious, but men being considered disposable *IS* misandry. How much more can you hate someone than to not even consider them human anymore, just a disposable object? And if that's what you think of them, that means you don't believe they're deserving of the most basic fundamental of rights, and that's the right to life. And If that's not hate, what is?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/22 03:37 PM
1

The issue has more to do with empathy than social norms. Does a person want to be whistled at by strangers if they're found attractive? Aside from asking the person before doing so, common sense would dictate erring on the side of caution, and assuming they wouldn't. But as wolf-whistling at women is such common behavior throughout much of the world, it could only be considered "basic social interaction." And as the OP stated, some women are fine with it, while as you indicated, others aren't. B…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/22 08:19 AM
1

Last year they made some changes and for a brief while, misandry was frowned upon. But then a scandal broke out stating that Facebook was favoring right-wing proponents on their platform, as they'd hired conservatives to administrate it. IIRC the people in question were fired and now FB is back to giving misandry a free pass, the same as they have for years.
/r/MensRights06/12/20 07:47 AM
0

Some feminists might claim they aren't misandrists, but they're liars whether they realize it or not. All feminists are misandrists as all of their theories are rooted in misandrist conspiracy theories. And these theories "inform" the position they impose on society. But not all misandrists are feminists. There are plenty of conservatives that are staunchly opposed to helping men in need while coddling women. Unlike how they feel about women, they believe men should "pull themselves up by their …
/r/MensRights06/12/20 07:29 AM
-4

This happened 6 years ago and got a lot of attention in r/PublicFreakout when it was posted--it's old news. On top of that the title is a bit misleading--feminists are man-haters but man-haters aren't necessarily feminists. This woman was obviously a crazy misandrist, but we don't know if she was a feminist or not.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 07:12 AM
1

Human suffering fuels our rent-seeking and profiteering society. The pandemic for example, has caused the wealth of all the billionaires in the world to increase by 1/3rd. So it's in the best interest of those at the top to keep people suffering. The more victims the better, and that includes white men.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 06:42 AM
1

The irrational, extremist lefties, not the rational ones like myself. I routinely confront them online and end up getting kicked and blocked from their groups. I stand for human rights, critical thinking and intolerance of prejudice. They don't. They're so filled with hate and revisionism, they're no different from fascists.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 06:35 AM
1

Yes, and they'll dismiss your complaint. I've reported blatant misandry and FB always responds with "We have reviewed the media you have flagged and found it does not violate our community guidelines."
/r/MensRights05/12/20 06:26 AM
1

Well, maybe the wives of wealthy men in traditional relationships. But I wouldn't say that for the vast majority of women, not in the US anyway. Most people have no choice but to work now. The days of it being the norm for a single person to be able to support an entire family with their salary are long gone.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 06:17 AM
1

True, although it's not a wage gap but an income gap. The hourly rate that people are paid for their occupation is their wage. Income on the other hand, is the total amount they take home during each pay period. The wages men and women are paid in the same occupations are identical ie a male and female sales clerks working in retail earn the same hourly rate. But there's an income gap between the two as men typically elect to work more hours than women.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 06:02 AM
1

I love what Peterson has to say about men, postmodernism and feminism. But I'm not so thrilled about what he has to say about our system of free enterprise. I'm a mixed economist myself, I can see where the system works wonders and where it's a catastrophic failure. And I can say the same about socialist systems. And he has such a myopic view, not willing to acknowledge the bad along with the good. It drives me crazy.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 03:54 PM
11

I disagree with point 2.5 of this FAQ, at least as far as the US is concerned. Men ARE much worse off than women. Their numbers living in poverty, falling into poverty, committing suicide, being incarcerated, being murdered, being victims of violent crime, having shorter lifespans, etc., DWARF WOMEN. If this were happening to women in the same numbers, it would be DECLARED A CRISIS. There'd be mass hysteria, protests in the street, schools would be let out and the media wouldn't let up. They'd b…
/r/MensRights24/11/20 01:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter