TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

namewastakenlol Archive

View 2 posts and 151 comments by namewastakenlol on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You are trying to claim that (actual) raping someone who is passed out or about to is equal to "raping" someone who had a couple of drinks and thought the "assailant" was an 9 instead of a 6. Of course, as /r/mr's resident strawman constructor and female supremacist who would expect anything different from you? Yes, fuck mens rea, because all men are able to tell a woman has had two drinks and should just not rape her, it's as simple as that.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 04:20 AM
2

Every time I look down there and see my penis plotting yet another crime I am ashamed.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 03:16 AM
3

The Sims?
/r/MensRights23/07/12 03:13 AM
7

IQ is actually a poor predictor of success, although I wouldn't say it means nothing.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 03:10 AM
2

That is probably true, but you can be socially conditioned to have subconscious responses also.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 02:57 AM
2

I think there is a valid criticism asking whether these men genuinely wanted to do so naturally or were socially conditioned to do so.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 02:55 AM
1

To be frank, you are incorrect. One is a parenting role, one is a gender role.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 02:50 AM
2

Male sexuality is worse than genocide and writing about boobs is worse than war crimes because objectification. This is how the Patriarchy prevents women from closing the wage gap.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 12:45 PM
5

No you don't understand because of your privilege. It's due to patriarchy /s
/r/MensRights21/07/12 12:39 PM
1

The word you are looking for is "unprofessional", I think.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 12:38 PM
1

I think the real issue is that some feminists are fine with innocent people being imprisoned as long as they are male. Why should there be a problem with prosecuting someone who falsely reports a crime.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 12:28 PM
3

I'd rather fight the idea that exclusively targeting men as victims is somehow mysogyny.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:36 PM
2

Holy fuck. Who thinks of this shit?
/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:25 PM
1

I'm going to hazard a guess here and say it's because men are all sexhungry fuckmachines and women are all delicate flowers, since that is the usual reason.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 05:17 PM
2

It's not you I am mocking, no worries :)
/r/MensRights18/07/12 05:12 PM
21

I once saw a post where the first half was a girl ranting about how she wears those stupid bug-eye sunglasses for her own comfort and don't you fucking dare tell her how to dress and fuck you she is not an object for your personal pleasure. The second half was telling men not to wear frayed pants because it is unattractive. This reminds me of that.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 05:01 PM
2

If you disregard all logic and emiricism it is quite astonishing what conclusions you might come to. Here, I'll try; "all feminists want to circumsize babies in order to use their foreskins in magical elixirs that bring pleasant daydreams to the drinker".
/r/MensRights18/07/12 04:40 PM
1

I don't disagree that rape is probably more traumatic than those crimes, but I think the trigger warning is when you enter some sort of public forum. I just don't like any sort of shaming people into behaving in a certain way.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 02:06 PM
3

Getting told you cannot participate in a discussion due to your sex is prejudice and intellectually dishonest. End of story.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 10:59 AM
1

This is a hypocrisy that should be addressed. Why aren't feminists leaping out of audiences to howl about the worse crime of joking about murder? Why isn't "threatening" a person with murder or violence just as abhorrent as "threatening" them with rape?
/r/MensRights17/07/12 02:08 AM
2

Good work, researcher. Now let's criminalize those and also criminalize events or stimuli that trigger victims of assault, grand theft, murder, identity theft, and jaywalking.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 02:04 AM
10

It's a venue with which you made a private deal. You only have freedom of speech with respect to your dealings with the government. The rest of the audience would probably appreciate that you stop being a douche.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 02:00 AM
6

Well it sure would if it existed.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 01:57 AM
3

He even issued an apology over Twitter IIRC, so he was silenced. I think it's reasonable to assume "it would be funny if you died right now" is not a threat, but if you dare replace death there with rape then you are going to have a bad day.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 01:55 AM
2

I agree. That was one example. It seems valid in some cases; like making women too paranoid to wear what they want is uncool. I don't agree that jokes are part of this... I mean nobody takes jokes about personal injury, assault, or murder as if they were serious threats, and those are far more likely situations. I've digressed... My point is that the article is not so biased, it has some good points that are worth considering.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:52 PM
6

I find it weird when feminists say they get told to "sit down and shut up" like it is the worst thing, because I've never seen anyone say that to a woman, but I've been told basically that as a man by feminists.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:26 PM
5

Dictionaries are mostly for the purpose of recording the usage of language and therefore it's fine for them to report that definition for double standard because that is indeed how it is used. Let's be pissed at society and focus on changing the definition by making people aware of men's issues.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:23 PM
4

The article actually acknowledges that men are raped, and is instead making the claim that rape jokes are part of institutionalized use of rape "threats" to make women act in a certain way, viz., "don't go out at night alone, you will be raped". Now I leave it to you fine folks to decide if you agree with that or not, but this poster has severely misrepresented the article.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:16 PM
0

Re: China: I can guarantee you the sex of the teacher matters fuckall when there are half a hundred students in the smallest classes.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:03 PM
7

I mean, that's fine if that's what people want to do, but it sounds like he was obviously not into it and they definitely should have stopped.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 07:36 AM
3

You are correct, if we ignore all the feminists doing things you don't approve of, and include all of the "feminists" doing things you approve of, it looks like a movement of nice people. Too bad the group is not determined by what you personally find acceptable.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 03:29 AM
3

No true Scotsman. Quite often feminists support only female supremacy. Sometimes a feminist supports equality, like you.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 03:19 AM
9

What's troublesome is that the gay men were probably drunk and egging each other on (not a real excuse), but you, in the clarity of an internet poster still thinks sexual assault is okay (not even a pretend excuse).
/r/MensRights12/07/12 03:13 AM
2

No, she should receive jail time in accordance with a filing a false report. The police should be fired and jailed for arresting and sexually assaulting two men without any evidence of wrongdoing.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 11:35 AM
1

I hate that dumbass's bullshit also, but "team vagina"? That's not really necessary.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 11:31 AM
1

This would be brilliant satire if it was not real. Sadly it is offensive instead.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 06:06 PM
4

I think it's weird how "you're the one that deserves to be raped" magically became a direct rape threat like it says in the article.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 10:51 AM
2

I know men can get arrested for domestic abuse if they call for help because they are getting abused. So the imaginary victim hasn't reported an imaginary crime and there's still an arrest.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 04:35 AM
1

Well now that the government will provide women and only women with free birth control and pregnancy-related healthcare, you can take your argument and fuck yourself with it.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 04:19 AM
13

Some good samaritans have gotten taken to Chinese courts and the plaintiff wins because, "he only stopped because he felt guilty". Now no more good samaritans.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 05:33 PM
1

I absolutely understood that was your message, it was just the phrasing that bothered me. I am too high-strung or something.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 05:22 PM
1

With that argument, why should they not ban office menstruation as well?
/r/MensRights09/07/12 12:46 PM
2

You can exercise your bladder until you are able to shoot over the door, then they will not want your feet pointing forward.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 12:44 PM
2

What is this from? I've seen it a bunch.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 12:42 PM
15

The stats are: during gay sex both people have a penis so both of them are the rapist. Those are calculated in fantasy math as were the stats above.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 12:39 PM
1

You are quite correct in pointing out the incorrect assumption that sexual identity is the sole determiner of your social class. And I really don't want to belittle your point... but we can't use the feminist definition because it's idiotic. Other than that nagging at me, your post was awesome.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 12:35 PM
1

The sad part about this comment is that we need to present sources before people see what is glaringly obvious.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 12:28 PM
2

Here is a challenge for anyone willing: find even a single reason that the "prejudice plus power" definition is even slightly useful for dialog... other than excusing prejudice against males.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 12:26 PM
3

Or, if you subscribe to reality, both men and women have been oppressed for centuries by a minority of sociopaths.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 01:08 AM
2

Haha just like a puffer fish. I know whenever I feel threatened I dash home for a protein shake and some squats.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 12:52 AM
1

I think it's not most time around the same sex, but extreme amounts of time away from the other sex. Most men and women I knew in uni spent most their time with the same sex; those same people are now in relationships and spend most their time with their partner.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 12:50 AM
1

You are right, of course.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:52 PM
1

Please die in a fire.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:45 PM
2

Even so; it's pretty shocking that they would be so bold as to pretend allowing men to control their own sperm "takes away from women's reproductive rights". Men cannot be trusted to force themselves into indentured servitude is what they are saying.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 09:59 AM
17

Two is just regurgitating the same old "privilege" bullshit. Pride in men is no longer the default; pretending that all men are villainous rapists is now the default. But try pointing out that straight men do have to fight to be accepted as normal and good and you will get shouted down by a cult that thinks male circumcision is misogyny and that there is a conspiracy called "the Patriarchy" that keeps women from fair wages.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 08:31 AM
4

Perhaps we're the only ones not biased against men?
/r/MensRights08/07/12 08:23 AM
1

Since the only argument for abortion seems to be "my body", how can anyone argue against vasectomies with a straight face?
/r/MensRights08/07/12 04:58 AM
1

Deadbeat coastwalkers are the worst!
/r/MensRights07/07/12 11:59 PM
1

As much as I admire your intentions, there's absolutely no way you could list all the violations of the spirit of the law.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 06:22 PM
3

You are being sarcastic, but I recently read a post that earnestly described how circumcision was done only because women were too cockhungry for uncut penises, therefore sexism. It was like a case study in logical fallacies and cognitive bias.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 08:25 AM
8

Freedom is slavery!
/r/MensRights07/07/12 08:21 AM
7

Sexism is not generally classified as prejudice with power, that is a bullshit definition invented to absolve people of any misandry.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 08:20 AM
8

If it's such a huge disparity, why don't the good cops get rid of the bad cops, then?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 07:51 AM
1

Haha, good point, but the press didn't exactly point out the tazer was uneccesary. Read it however you like, though, I don't really care.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 07:46 AM
2

There are far more stories where the tazer was not needed but still used. Tazers are "nonlethal" not notlethal, they shouldn't be whipped out on a whim. I think if you understood that it's possible to defend yourself without kicking people when they are down, you'd see that a lot of these accusations of brutality are well founded.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 04:38 AM
1

I do not disagree.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 04:31 AM
2

It seems to me that the press typically sides with the police, even when it's a male against a female. Just a point I thought was relevant, I don't disagree with anyone's outrage here.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 04:31 AM
50

While I think you have a very valid point, I think another significant difference here is typical Aussie police versus typical US stormtroopers.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 03:45 PM
6

Yes that is consistent with the judicial system's view; women committing crimes is not as bad as men, and the opposite for being the victim of a crime. That's because statistically men get attacked more, so we need to spread the seriousness of it across more events.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:37 AM
2

You know nothing about their work environment, you just decided you are angry at them and you aren't going to let any goddamn reason or logic get in the way.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:32 AM
2

No, see, if you define sexism as prejudice and power, then misandry doesn't exist. So it's okay!
/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:28 AM
3

And yet feminists will say that women are the only ones that society forces to be hyper vigilant. The US corrections need to be taught about the 8th Amendment.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:22 AM
28

Someone should tell Dorsey he can staff his company with ladies for 23% less!
/r/MensRights04/07/12 07:36 AM
1

No, obviously it should not. What I fail to see is how asking a woman out is in all cases equivalent to demanding a toy from a child, which is what the implication was. I doubt the majority of men there are saying, "hey, I'm going to need to use your vagina for a while," but that is really the only situation that matches the metaphor. But yes, that would be a fucked-up way to interact with another person.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 05:44 AM
1

You can claim I am looking for ghosts just as much as I can claim you are refusing to see the evidence in his tone and content of the metaphors. Why were all of the metaphors posted as zero sum situations? If the intent was not to argue against male sexuality, the poster should have stopped before the metaphor or chosen something more appropriate.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 12:37 AM
2

Or this is how a lot of men feel because society tells them they feel that way.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 12:21 AM
1

Did you also read the comments that started the topic? I think the later comment about stealing toys also gives us insight into what was intended. Maybe both sides overreacted, but it is not like we were misreading it by a whole lot.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 12:08 AM
0

I started reading from further up in the thread, where a poster wrote that all sexual advances are unwanted. Later that same poster wrote that since there's a 10:1 male to female ratio at the conference men need to not approach women. This metaphor was the poster's attempt to restate a post wherein the assumption was that any approach would be awkward and blunt. ( http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/vro7e/python_programmers_sign_pledge_only_to/c57fdyn ) I don't know. The argument before…
/r/MensRights03/07/12 11:33 AM
0

I would have agreed if they continued in that manner instead of equating asking a woman out with trying to take her food. It's the presumtion that A. dating is zero sum and the man is depriving the woman of something and B. men are asking for something they know is wrong. I don't disagree that they should be tactful, just that we can do a better job of not villiying male sexuality.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:18 AM
3

you should know that I'm rather vindictive, though
/r/MensRights02/07/12 02:33 PM
5

You should make the privilege of being congratulated after forced intercourse with a woman stand by itself. Would you also consider adding: The privilege of being charged with rape if the other party regrets intercourse. Sometimes even when he and the other party never had intercourse. and The privilege of being told to sit down and shut up when discussing men's or women's issues.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 12:18 PM
3

I don't disagree, but the current system drains far too much money from the man, and requires no accounting from the woman.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 12:15 PM
10

turning the other cheek means only the unjust will see
/r/MensRights02/07/12 12:06 PM
1

I think you also get banned for posting in r/mr among other things.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 01:06 AM
3

Why would SRS bother with this argument when having a penis means you are a rapist anyway? Lying makes it a double rape for longer jail time or what? I don't think I need an /s but this is SRS we are talking about so maybe it isn't hyperbole :(
/r/MensRights01/07/12 04:42 PM
6

While I don't have enough statistical data to say you are incorrect, neither do you have enough statistical data to say you are. Obviously some boys can learn in the current environment, but if it (statistically significantly) hinders them, shouldn't we change it?
/r/MensRights01/07/12 02:12 PM
1

You said what I attempted to write so eloquently that I deleted my post.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 08:22 AM
2

Didn't you know? Asking a woman to have sex with you is the same as depriving her of a resource she needs to live. Unless you are attractive, then it's like getting her an ice cream.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 07:11 AM
1

I don't think it was a scheme, I think someone came up with it and other people saw it and thought, well, that lets us be misandrist as much as we like without getting called out on it. So they rationalised it as describing differences between the harms suffered by women and those suffered by men.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 07:00 AM
1

As far as I can tell, one definition is bullshit invented to absolve everyone of being misandrist. I don't see why we shouldn't have disagreement over that.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 04:12 AM
-1

Well that's what I thought, but it's apparently unacceptable because there are too many men asking. Now I am at a loss.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 03:44 AM
1

I didn't know that! Well, that kindof sucks for women :/
/r/MensRights30/06/12 03:29 PM
7

I thought he only wrote that to underscore that gender doesn't make a great/poor teacher. I agree with you.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 03:55 AM
1

still you, but whatever
/r/MensRights30/06/12 03:44 AM
1

Yes!
/r/MensRights30/06/12 03:44 AM
1

If you look at his post he does not do that. It's easy to have your points "proven" when you interpret the evidence as you wish without any objectivity.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 03:28 AM
1

If trying to say that not all men are rapists is disagreeing with feminists about everything, then I am agaist them as well. There should be plenty of room for gender equality without criminalizing men, and if you think there is not, then fuck you.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 03:04 AM
0

But if you are a successful and social adult how can I dismiss your claims without consideration?
/r/MensRights30/06/12 02:32 AM
2

But surely you can eat whatever you like and also exercise? I don't quite understand
/r/MensRights30/06/12 02:23 AM
1

So rather than admitting he has a point, like you said you would, you prefer to move the goalposts of your current argument.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 02:16 AM
1

From another post in this thread http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/vq33p/whats_wrong_with_mens_rights/
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:37 AM
1

It's funny that you have such an ego when your life's work amounts to a few comments below threshold in every r/mr thread.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:34 AM
1

I don't think you sound out of line at all. Thank you, please keep doing whatever it is that makes you you.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:29 AM
5

Well hopefully you get banned again soon, the majority of your posts were taking others out of context or just plain trolling.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:11 AM
2

Just letting you know I think I agree with this position, and shall be doing more research.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:06 AM
6

I didn't get the impression that an MRA doesn't think sexism exists, there just seems to be a refusal to accept everything put forward as misogynist. I got a bunch of downvotes the other day for asserting that circumcision is not misogynist. I fully support equal opportunities, but I don't support "calling someone a bitch is part of what keeps women oppressed".
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:02 AM
1

I have not posted a single thing outside of /r/mr that wasn't immediately dismissed by "patriarchy so you don't know the truth". Nobody but me made any counter-claims to that either. I'd certainly be much less hostile towards feminism if they stopped telling me my thoughts are invalid because penis. Or if there were any noticeable vocal opponents to the "one or two" extremists.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 05:32 PM
1

Well that could be said when someone posts a "I found this on /r/funny look it's making a joke at men's expense" but not when someone posts a "let's stop cutting off the tip of a baby's penis" or "let's enforce the law when someone falsely reports a crime".
/r/MensRights29/06/12 05:26 PM
64

A simple way to sell MRAs on feminism would be to make feminism about equality and not about female supremacy. It would also be nice to be able to discuss it without being told I cannot possibly understand anything due to my gender.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 11:56 AM
7

It's not misogyny, it just offends your delicate sensibilities. Grow up.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 02:02 AM
11

That's because you think it's okay to have double standards if it puts down men, but not vice versa.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 01:56 AM
5

No, that's too rational! Please consider the fact that rape culture patriarchy.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 01:53 AM
2

Just because some feminists flip their shit over nothing doesn't mean you have to.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 01:30 PM
1

It's like a Christian posting a perfectly accurate description of evolution, thinking all the while that he's making a satire.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 01:17 PM
2

Clarification: when a currently discriminated against group manages to make gains it is a good thing. If a group is only historically discriminated against and makes gains it is a bad thing for the other groups which are now discriminated against. I would also prefer that we don't link to "white decline" websites.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 11:28 AM
1

Asking people to not use the term is fine. But I don't think you should expect or feel entitled to somehow not hear a certain word.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 11:16 AM
11

The last line sounds like a creepy rapist justifying her actions.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 10:56 AM
7

You must be mistaken; that's the reason you get vitriol, not her.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 01:04 AM
1

I wish I had your clarity of mind half a day ago. That's a brilliant counter to an idiotic claim.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 12:37 PM
1

I read that one and the argument was that some rabbi said men need to be circumcised because women are too cock-hungry for the regular kind; therefore, sexism against women.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 12:36 PM
4

But it's absurdly problematic. If two people are having sex and one person doesn't really want to, but doesn't make that clear, the second person didn't have any intent. Like suppose a man does not want it, but he gets a boner anyway. How would his partner distinguish between that and being tired but appreciative unless he says to stop?
/r/MensRights25/06/12 12:11 AM
4

I think you would have to be mentally disturbed in some way to actually commit a rape.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 12:04 AM
5

YOU MADE A RAPEY JOKE! RAPE CULTURE! NOW WE ARE ALL INFLUENCED SUBCONCIOUSLY TO RAPE!
/r/MensRights25/06/12 12:03 AM
4

This is complete bullshit, since if it effects women so much they can choose uncut partners. They has a choice, unlike the men. Circumcision is undeniably worse for the man.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 11:59 PM
1

I took him seriously I suppose :/
/r/MensRights24/06/12 11:52 PM
-20

If you're a guy, you should check in with a therapist sometime. I bet you have plenty to offer the world. There's no need to be so down on yourself.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 01:33 PM
5

Also we aren't talking about the rapist's choice because every normal person already knows not to rape. What the hell do people imagine happening? "Don't put drugs in a woman's drink and then have sex with her while she's passed out, it is illegal and immoral." "Oh, thanks for the heads up." I think it's safe to say rapists are not misguided but in fact psychologically disturbed. Running a "don't rape" flyer campaign is therefore not going to be effective. It's not really something you can educa…
/r/MensRights24/06/12 06:30 AM
4

Most nice guys I've met only had the idea that they should not tell the women they like her, because of all the constant moaning about men looking at their breasts. They mistakenly assumed that they should just wait until the woman chose them, "oh we have such a good time together, let's do it romantically". Then they get kindof angry when instead the girl they are interested in hooks up with a man that was forward in exactly the way they were told not to be.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 12:22 AM
14

That's what my mother taught me and I lost my virginity pretty late due to real women don't want a sad puppy, so YMMV
/r/MensRights23/06/12 12:11 AM
1

You forgot Lovelace :(
/r/MensRights23/06/12 12:01 AM
-1

The wage gap is exactly as real as the hours worked gap.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 12:00 AM
1

were you homeschooled
/r/MensRights21/06/12 11:14 PM
2

If cutting off a penis is okay, it must also be okay to core out a vagina.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 12:43 PM
6

There's one out there trying to stop men from oppressively slouching on buses.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 12:39 AM
3

How did they measure patriarchy? I'm curious because it's imaginary.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 12:37 AM
2

This argument is severely flawed. The reason the male's mother didn't sue is because stripping a male is not seen as an egregious violation. The current government is working on passing laws to make attacking women a more serious crime, and support centers for men are basically nonexistent. The average woman makes less money than the average man because she works less hours. But we're still pushing legislation to equalize it -- which would mean paying men less per hour. The assumption that men a…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 12:35 AM
3

I was called gay a while back because I didn't want to fuck this hideous fat girl. So don't worry about that, that kind of person has no clue how male sexuality works.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 11:52 PM
0

No those are shit titles as well. How about "what causes divorce"? Of course, since you are a douche with a chip on your shoulder you'll continue being rude and inflammatory instead.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 11:14 PM
7

In this article, a sad bastard fantasizes about being a teen and getting forced to have sex by an older woman, then mistakes his fantasy as being a universal male constant. Later he notes that it's different if it's a male teacher and a female student because biology. If you didn't read the article, don't bother, as he had no sources other than his own masturbatory fantasies.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 08:52 AM
1

Well that's because you're using a shit title that implies all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 04:26 AM
8

So either do somethig you don't want or do something difficult you don't want and get graded on it. Yeah those are great choices. Protip: that's not optional.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 09:44 PM
2

They are convicted of it? I take back my other comment.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 11:30 PM
8

Yeah, I have come to understand this recently, but I'm still at the point where it's disturbing me how obvious they are and how they still have a bunch of support while mocking and degrading men.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 11:28 PM
8

I'm also assuming hackers would be joking about male-on-male assrape, so you are doubly right.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 11:27 PM
3

That's disappointing. EDIT: apparently it's for convicted offenders, so I changed my mind, it's not disappointing.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 11:25 PM
7

oh I missed that hackers can't go for two minutes without talking about ass rape. Rape culture lol all menz are villains.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 10:35 PM
12

It's just so fucking disappointing every time you see it.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 10:32 PM
1

I've always assumed the intention of calling a man a pussy is exactly the same as saying he has no balls. It's not meant to be, "you are acting like a woman," it's meant to be, "you are acting like a man without any manhood". That's how I've always interpreted it.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:33 PM
4

Seriously. I've had classes where the disruptive person was a woman and disliked her input, and I have had classes where the top performer was a woman and I appreciated her input. The correct solution is not to separate classes by gender, since gender has nothing to do with disruptive capacity, but to throw out disruptive parties.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 01:46 PM
1

I honestly do not want to meet any man that would claim men cannot be trusted around a naked infant because what the fuck.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 01:22 AM
2

It was pleasantly surprising to see the other comments were all rational and supportive, considering how Jezebel typically regards men.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 04:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter