TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

naryn Archive

View 0 posts and 54 comments by naryn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It's important due to the cultural significance. Marriage is a lot more important in India than in many other countries and so this is a big deal to many Indians.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 01:34 PM
1

Also would it count a fatherless home as one in which the parents are divorced but the father still sees them often? Because that's my situation (though not a runaway) and I certainly wouldn't count myself as fatherless.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 04:09 PM
16

Yeah when you think that 30 years ago women weren't even allowed in the military and until 2012 still not allowed on the frontline then there's other reasons for the bias
/r/MensRights19/05/13 04:07 PM
1

Really, around here you never get a difference for guys / girls. However I don't really go out in bigger cities.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 05:01 PM
2

This isn't a concert. It's a nightclub venue.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 05:00 PM
-2

Most places don't have gentlemen nights because they don't really care. Also ladies nights can mean different things, my stepfather is a free mason and their "ladies nights" are actually the only nights ladies are allowed
/r/MensRights18/05/13 04:59 PM
6

but in essence here the OP was a long distance sperm donor. What? So because he wasn't there for the birth he can't be a father? That's fucking nuts, it's not like this was years ago, the mother died in February
/r/MensRights18/05/13 10:50 AM
6

I would value parental rights over grandparental rights though. If the child was definitely going to grow up in a bad conditions and be significantly worse off then I would see your point, but he isn't. The better choice for the child is one that does not kidnap their own grandchild.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 02:42 AM
7

He has however seemed like he's a graduate, or very close at least. It's not like he's a highschool dropout or convicted criminal that is the environment he's growing up in
/r/MensRights18/05/13 02:32 AM
1

There are also examples like a ton more women going into teaching because they like the vacation time. It's appears to be an important factor, but what they're doing with it doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 05:29 PM
1

I think studies show that men are more likely to work longer hours if there's a possibility for promotion, women tend to work just as hard as male counterparts but do things like overtime less and push for more pay etc less. But I'm not an expert, it's much more complicated than oh that guy has a dick he gets 10% more pay.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 05:20 PM
3

There was a study that showed during interviews or whatever, women opted for more vacation time or whatever whereas men were much more likely to push harder for a raise.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 11:39 AM
5

I remember a scene from some sitcom or movie, where the teacher says that a student will be a binman in the future if he doesn't do his work. The student then goes on to say that binmen earn more than the teacher himself does
/r/MensRights13/05/13 08:09 PM
-10

The 75% of divorces could very likely be because recently women have been able to initiate divorces. Relatively speaking it's very recent that women have been able to be be financially able to live by themselves. Therefore they basically had to be married, it was seen as their duty. Plus marriages with kids, the men might not be able to easily see the children should there be a divorce. Women for the most part don't have an issue there.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 03:08 PM
-14

I'm not saying they don't care. But they don't care as much as women. Most men don't spend over an hour every day on appearance, nor do they tend to spend a huge amount of money on cosmetics and the like.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:06 PM
-27

It's a biased article because it's sort of true. Guys might get based on their looks but they don't care half as much as girls for the most part. Girls don't even dress up that much to look good for guys, they do it to look good for other girls, to impress other girls. Ever seen Mean Girls? It's an exaggeration but works for the most part.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 01:36 PM
8

Closeness in age laws I can only see when it's people who are underage. If you're say 15 and your boyfriends 17 then it shouldn't really be illegal, but if you're 15 and the guy's say 35 then there might be a problem. If you're over the age of consent though it should be consent to everyone, it's weird when they specify what sexual acts you can and can't do, like gay sex up till I think 1997 had an age of consent of 18, while normal age of consent was 16
/r/MensRights09/05/13 01:22 PM
1

Yep, also the averages are probably going to be slanted towards men having higher sentences etc simply due to things like rape and the like not only being more common by men but by male victims reporting it a lot less.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 01:11 PM
4

Pretty bad survey honestly, only 25 cases using female defendants which could very likely skew the results. Plus it's NJ only, so specific laws are a problem, one being that a man got 9 years for having sex with a 16 year old girl, in most places in the world age of consent is 16, so he may have gotten fired but not jailed.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 12:56 PM
0

If the mother doesn't want child support, a state can't force it. If he wanted CS he could have probably gotten it, but it's a weird situation as the kids are grown up now
/r/MensRights05/05/13 03:38 AM
1

The actual quote comes from Ghandi, whether or not messages are similar, though it's a pretty widely accepted theory that justice shouldn't simply be about revenge, that's much too similar to Sharia law for my liking.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 06:22 PM
1

It was actually Ghandi that said that but whatever, the fact remains that you shouldn't use justice as a tool of revenge.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 12:46 PM
3

Murderers have the option of parole, she didn't do any worse than first degree murder, so she should have the option of parole.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 11:48 AM
4

An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind. Justice is not about revenge, punishment should focus on reformation not on vengeance.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 11:46 AM
5

I can understand that you might be able to get off charges on insanity, that's fine. What's not fine is that she was held for 45 days and then released. If you are insane enough to cut some guys dick off, then you shouldn't be allowed to live with the public, if you're considered sane enough to live in the public, you shouldn't have been given an insanity clearing.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 11:44 AM
1

I was looking for the territory in the article though, that was what my mind was skimming for not a district court but I see your point.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 09:40 PM
2

I'm sorry, I looked but the article wasn't very clear on where it took place.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 08:56 PM
5

I'm 19 and I'd take bribes for cigarettes and alcohol, that shit's expensive.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 03:47 PM
-5

or believe on reasonable grounds that the person is 17 or older. Which she did, she said they were 18-19.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 02:00 PM
-32

That's her quote on the issue.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 01:52 PM
4

It is an offence in South Australia to engage in any activity which involves fellatio, cunnilingus or placing any part of the body within the labia majora, vagina or anus of a person under the age of 17 unless they are your lawful spouse. The Australian Marriage Act can permit someone who is 18 or over to marry a 16 year old.However it is a defence if the person is 16 at the time of the offence and either you are under 17 years of age or believe on reasonable grounds that the person is 17 or old…
/r/MensRights02/05/13 01:47 PM
1

Razing the land counts too, but it also refers to towns and cities.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 03:19 PM
1

We're using the English language, I gave an example (plus 100 years War was in the 14th to 15th Century) of it in use in history. It's still used in the English language, though not as commonly.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:38 PM
-1

It's more of an archaic term, but that's what rape has always been traditionally, in the 100 years, raping the land was a tactic of the English who swept through French countryside destroying crops and villages.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:13 PM
-11

Well it will always be possible, because rape has more than one definition. To rape can be to pillage, so you can pillage without touching women if you want, though it is implied.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:40 PM
2

I think on hiatus is used in the UK, probably not as commonly but I think it's the technical term
/r/MensRights22/04/13 02:47 PM
3

If sexual coercion for men is counted as rape then I think the numbers for women is probably even higher.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:22 PM
7

They ruled it out because whilst in theory it worked, in practice it never did. Theoretically you could segregate the population based on eye colour, it would still be equal as long as everyone has the same equal rights. (However that doesn't make it just. Whole different kettle of fish there, say we're talking about marriage, you're only allowed to marry people with the same eye colour as you, browns with browns, blues with blues etc. That is equal, every person has exactly the same right to ma…
/r/MensRights20/04/13 12:56 AM
23

Separate but equal was only struck down though because whilst facilities were separate they were incredibly unequal, it took a long time and money to convince the S.C of that. Theoretically separate but equal is equal but in reality it almost never is. In this case we'd more than likely see a male only hour 2-4am and a women's 7-9pm every weekday or something making it essentially unfair to a man due to the time not being prime hours.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 09:31 PM
20

I did do a double take when I saw the link
/r/MensRights19/04/13 09:28 PM
-1

It really wouldn't, not unless a teacher is a pretty bad feminist.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 08:10 AM
11

Honestly, I see this as another whining post in /r/MensRights, this sort of stuff is meant to be taken lightheartedly, as are the signs that imply women should be in the kitchen or whatever. This isn't a real issue.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 12:54 AM
0

She could have also been trying to help, I don't know the situation but for many couples they might see it as a spontaneous good thing rather than rape, it could just be misinterpretation.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 08:17 PM
-2

I'm fairly sure it doesn't. Man Flu is just a term that means that men supposedly get sick less, but when they do it tends to be much worse than what women get.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:49 PM
1

I thought the video said they were 11, but 8th graders are what 12? 13? Still fairly young to be put on the sex offenders list like many people here are saying they should be
/r/MensRights02/04/13 09:45 PM
0

It depends on intent. Whilst it may have been sexual to you in nature, in terms of both the law, and intent of the girls it wasn't to either of them. It was in the intent of humiliation, not sexual in nature and the legal system doesn't classify it as sexual either.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 09:26 PM
-1

Also because the mother didn't press charges. I'm sorry but I don't support 11 year olds being put through the justice system regardless of gender
/r/MensRights02/04/13 09:24 PM
-1

No they wouldn't have. The mother chose not to press charges, the girls were also 11, which is below the age you can go to jail, at least in the UK. For the life of me, I can't remember the place, but there was an actual rape by a couple of boys recently, both of which got off very lightly due to their age
/r/MensRights02/04/13 09:22 PM
7

Teleprompter's last day
/r/MensRights30/03/13 02:26 AM
2

I went with a massive group for my 12 (maybe 13th) birthday party in the UK, I think the limit is 10...
/r/MensRights30/03/13 02:26 AM
5

Even the reporter says that the kid is enjoying it.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 02:25 AM
2

Definitely, the reporter says so
/r/MensRights30/03/13 02:24 AM
3

Any reason for it?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 02:15 AM
1

Whilst the site is fairly untrustworthy anyway by the looks of it, the bill is mainly to stop people advocating a return to a male dominated society more than anything else, but it's a trashy newspaper so I wouldn't believe it.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 12:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter