nate20140074 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Flip the Script: No consequences for her lol i have 6 degrees and a nobel, "pls ignore how I've contributed 0 content to this thread at all". Let me know when you're willing to make a point that isn't just "boohoo ur wrong cause you aren't right enough", or when you want to explain the sciency science fields that have a working theory of power outside of P = IV ya smooth-brained moron What's a science, where do you draw the line? Only natural and physical, regardless of whether the methodology is sound? I mean, or course there are many…	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 12:07 PM
1	Flip the Script: No consequences for her Good answer, mate. I'll take that as a "referring to 'the sciences'" without having a degree I suppose. Sure, pub pol, law, phil are humanities, but if you're going to consider every social science a humanities also, you're just being pretty dense. Or you just have no idea what science is outside of natural/physical sciences, which probably makes more sense. Thought there was something to learn here, but I suppose you're pretty empty on information, and just like being a good ol' contrarian with…	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 11:56 AM
1	Flip the Script: No consequences for her lmao you didn't even make an argument for me to strawman 8) Which fields don't have a similar understanding of power to social science? Political science? Public policy? Philosophy? Law? What are the differences? Or are you just sorta gesturing to "the sciences" as agreeing with you?	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 11:34 AM
0	Flip the Script: No consequences for her Malcolm X = KKK Confirmed Equating any understanding of power to a "lol men have power so they can't do bad things checkmate!!" How reductionist indeed. Referring to the entire field of sociology as "sociology niches". How reductionist indeed. Durkheim? Weber? Foucault? Nah, none as intellectually sharp as the great InhabitantOfOddWorld! I'm sure you've gotten very far equating any argument that disagrees with you to Tumblr Feminism 8 )	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 10:03 AM
1	Flip the Script: No consequences for her If I call myself an egalitarian, but also fight for an apartheid state, am I still an egalitarian? Would egalitarianism now include apartheid?	/r/MensRights	27/12/17 08:13 PM
-4	Flip the Script: No consequences for her thats like equating malcolm x with the kkk. which is fair, if someone doesn't necessarily have any comprehension of the idea of power.	/r/MensRights	27/12/17 08:01 PM
1	Well said Dr. Fiamengo Just a side point here, it definitely could be argued that MLK type civil rights success was dependent and enabled by the Malcolm X type civil that put pressure on government to quickly and further consider solutions to a long existing problem. Besides, when oppression is itself violent, wholly peaceful resistance isn't always enough.	/r/MensRights	02/03/17 05:34 AM
1	Well said Dr. Fiamengo Ah, pardon me, I'm typing from mobile so I made a few mistakes. I'd wholeheartedly agree with your sentiment that class is definitely one of the strongest indicators of social status. I meant the opposite, or that Egalitarianism fights with the oppressed against the oppressor, so I definitely see how that could be incredibly confusing. Would you think it then possible that Egalitarianism is an overarching political stand point that includes feminism, civil rights, income equality, etc., while at…	/r/MensRights	01/03/17 06:06 PM
-1	Well said Dr. Fiamengo That's exactly my point, though. These individuals were oppressed based on their class. Men are not oppressed on account of their gender. An individual is not denied his personhood because he is a man, because he is white, because he is rich. It is because they were woman, or their race, or a different class qualifier depending on the times (land owner, Christian vs Nonchristian, American vs Nonamerican, etc). Egalitarianism doesn't exist in a vacuum, but it does if it neglects the very reasons …	/r/MensRights	01/03/17 05:44 PM
-4	Well said Dr. Fiamengo The act isnt addressing all violence. It is addressing gender motivated violence. Thats all im saying. There's plenty of resources going to addressing general violent crime. Also, you're right about female genital mutilation being absent in America, but I'm referring to global issues of feminism.	/r/MensRights	01/03/17 05:21 PM
-9	Well said Dr. Fiamengo I feel you on most of these points, but have some problems with a couple: More men may be the victim of violent crimes, but you're misinterpreting the Violence Against Women Act with such a statistic. Your point would prove valid if it addressed statistics that are relevant to the Act, namely, that Woman on Man violence is higher than Man on Woman violence, or that men suffer from gender motivated violence at higher rates than woman (which you will find just isn't true). Second, don't act like m…	/r/MensRights	01/03/17 04:38 PM
0	Well said Dr. Fiamengo Touching on your last point, it's really that the movement is entirely contextual. It spawns from the reality we live in where women, not men, were treated as second class citizens (some men may be treated as second class citizens, but usually under race/class/non-gender identities). Egalitarianism is equality in a vacuum, ignoring that the status quo favors white men, and that these movements are fighting against such a status quo in order to raise women and minorities to equality.	/r/MensRights	01/03/17 04:29 PM