TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nawitus Archive

View 7 posts and 69 comments by nawitus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Finland can maintain a volunteer army.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 10:43 AM
3

It was on Facebook, and I can't remember how she tried to weasel herself out of that one.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 07:31 PM
6

Here's the original source. Something to note is that the only MP against a new law is a member of the Green Party, known for their support of feminism. She argues that criminalizing religious circumcision means that the mutilation will be done in unhygienic circumstances. Another well-known feminist MP Anna Kontula has argued likewise elsewhere. When I asked her about using the same argument for female circumcision I didn't get a proper reply.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 06:49 PM
1

My point was that you didn't provide an argument for your claim that he is a sex offender, so my post was equal in value.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 08:40 AM
-2

If this is indeed a regular thing as the post says, he is a sex offender Wrong.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 07:05 PM
6

There seems to be one man in it these days (one out of 17). Anyway, I've interacted with STM's feminists and they're pretty clueless about gender equality. When the "official truth" is challenged they'll just say something like "oh we'll look into it" and then you'll hear nothing back.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 06:12 PM
2

No, that's Norway. It has been proposed in Finland, though.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 06:10 PM
2

The Ladies Event hasn't happened yet, and the discriminatory pricing seems to be a new thing this year.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 04:09 PM
8

It's a study from 'ammattikorkeakoulu', which is an advanced vocational school, comparable in some ways to a bachelors degree. While it's good to collect data from women leaders, the researchers don't seem to know anything about proper research. When the interviewed women say that they haven't experienced discrimination, the authors state(!) that they're simply false and try to deny reality - as if the it's irrelevant what the subjects state and that the truth is known 'objectively' beforehand b…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 05:02 PM
4

It's like studying gender without the studying.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 06:22 PM
-4

This is what bad photography and lighting, lack of make-up, wrong aspect ratios and strong compression creates.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 06:15 PM
2

Man writes "men are better than women" 'in a jest' -> career ends immediately. Woman writes "women are better than men" 'in a jest' -> nothing happens.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 09:58 PM
2

It's in the article.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:01 PM
5

Are you sure? The sale and production of pornography is already illegal, and so is prostitution (even if those laws are rarely enforced).
/r/MensRights25/04/13 01:35 PM
7

"Surprisingly" enough, everyone "was certain" that nobody makes false rape allegations in India in comments here.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 10:42 AM
2

Pasi Malmi: Discrimination Against Men. Appearence and Causes in the Context of a Modern Welfare State
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:04 PM
3

"He won't appreciate it. He's basically a white knight / feminist I think." His comment makes you think that, but it's also possible he just calculated the most appropriate reaction from a PR-standpoint.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 12:43 PM
11

Obama's reference could easily fit in r/politics if it would generate a major discourse on political forums / social media websites, which is true for Adria's case.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:36 AM
46

It's pretty clearly related to technology, though. It was a Python conference, after all. The issue is widely discussed in technology related sites, like YCombinator.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:20 AM
13

And when you go talk to the average feminist about a men's issue or sexism against men, they suddenly switch to talk about "institutional" sexism, which supposedly only exists against women, so there's no need to spend any time on men's issues.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 09:37 AM
7

That's easy to say if you're getting some.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:19 PM
-2

Argh, Rebecca Watson is still writing about this to make herself more famous.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 10:41 PM
3

Good theory but the numbers say otherwise. Whicn numbers? Here's some studies.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 07:42 PM
3

I think the term transgender was adopted because being transgender has nothing to do with sexuality. Gender can mean "biological sex" in some contexts, and "cultural gender" in others. Wikipedia: Depending on the context, the term [Gender] may refer to such concepts as sex (as in the general state of being male or female), social roles (as in gender roles) or gender identity.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:50 AM
2

You can find contact information for the school here. I send them an email about this issue.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:47 PM
2

But if you are in a committed one on one relationship and you agree to that, sleeping with someone else is an atrocity in my book. Committed relationships can actually be open. If you agree with your partner that you can have casual sex with other people then there's nothing wrong with that. On the other hand, if you agree to have a "closed" relationship (which happens to be the norm), then I can agree that the promise should be kept.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:41 PM
4

It's transgender, not transexual. Also, the appropriate term here is trans man.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:33 PM
1

One solution would be to vote for Republican or Democratic candidates who are for a voting reform. I don't know if such candidates actually exist (of course, it's too late for that in these presidential elections).
/r/MensRights23/10/12 04:42 PM
2

I don't find this to be that big of an issue compared to other things. Forced labour is not a big issue? Then what the hell is? It sucks that I may have to give up my life for my country but its worth it. That is not really an argument for gender discriminated conscription. Men are physically stronger than women and give the country a better chance of winning a war. Some men are, yes. You don't need a lot of strength to pull the trigger. Not everyone in the military is on the frontline shooting …
/r/MensRights21/10/12 06:28 AM
3

The man did nothing illegal, the woman was a violent assaulter.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 10:24 PM
4

If you step around in bullshit, don't be surprised when you occasionally meet the bull. That's victim blaming. Even if he is acting against social conventions or being annoying, taking a video is not grounds to being assaulted.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 10:14 PM
5

She said she assaulted him, and pushing someone is assault. You're insinuating that she balled up her fist and punched him in the face.. which was never specified. No, I'm claiming that only she assaulted him. And the court agrees. And so does her. Stop twisting facts. He was the aggressor, and the instigated. No, taking a video is not 'aggression'.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 10:13 PM
3

Throwing something at someone, or pushing them is assault. I said I didn't see her hit him, and they never specified her hitting him. She confessed she assaulted him.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 10:09 PM
5

Also I didn't notice her hitting him. I took it as she threw her jacket at him and he called that assault. Maybe I saw it differently, but this guy was only there to harass people until they acted out against him. He was causing the issue. Nice victim blaming. She said she assaulted him. Don't try to twist the facts here.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 10:06 PM
4

It's a whiny douche of a man complaining that his rights were violated because somebody he was bothering, bothered to fight back. Please stop using the word "whiny" about men's rights activists.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 10:05 PM
2

So if the roles were reversed, and a feminist went to some discussion on violence against men to harass the men.. you would be on her side? I'm not on anybody's side. I think violence should be illegal, and anyone who is violent should be prosecuted whether or not the perpetrator is a man or a woman.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 10:01 PM
4

Violence against men is a problem and shouldn't be tolerated, but all I saw was a women throwing her coat at him to stop him from recording her. She claimed that she assaulted him. Lets look at it this way, who caused the situation? Who was the one pursuing who, and who was the one asking to be left alone? The violent perpetrator caused to assault. Nice victim playing there, dear r/Feminism subscriber.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:37 PM
4

Dude, he shoved a camera in her face and went into full dickhead mode. According to the video he simply made a video recording, which is fully legal. She shoved the camera away. According to her, she assaulted him. She says this in the video. Put your man panties on and accept that fact. You're invalidating all men's rights issues by enforcing traditional gender rights. Please stop that. It's like saying to women "stop whining, it's only an assault lulz, put your woman panties on".
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:36 PM
1

He got what he wanted.. a chance to play the victim and a shot at knocking down feminism a notch. Yes, in your twisted r/feminist logic men who are victims of assault are not really the victims, but the "true" victim is the female perpetrator.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:17 PM
4

Without video evidence I'm sure she wouldn't have been prosecuted. You can't place much trust on the juridical system if you're a man and trying to get a woman prosecuted.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:15 PM
1

Which country is that?
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:10 PM
2

I didn't claim the account was fake, but it's a possibility.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 08:05 PM
1

I should note that her account is only 1 day old, which is a bit suspicious.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:01 PM
5

You can enable the downvote button by typing "+null" after the subreddit name. It disables all the silly CSS stuff.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:39 PM
0

I had an idea of creating r/streetcreep or something, which would consist only of photos from Google's Street View. Lets see the ban that.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:13 AM
3

One has a medically sound use, the other is a drug created almost purely for pleasure. Ehm, erectile dysfunction is a real disease.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:25 PM
5

Clearly, a woman who masturbates to weird porn is just empowering herself, but a man who does the same is simply a loser pervert.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:17 PM
1

They can cause a lot of harm to a person whose identity is revealed (e.g. spreading false rumors, ordering 100 pizzas to his home etc).
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:55 AM
1

In some states, a separate statutory offense of sending threatening letters or making threats has been created in order to penalize threats that are not made to extort money. - source
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:26 AM
7

So we can agree that some discrimination is warranted in some things? Like for instance you would not want a an army full of handicapped people fighting in the army or 8 years to drink big gulps full of beer. I didn't make any claims about the discrimination being justified or not. Discrimination is in certain cases justified, but that doesn't make it not discrimination. A similar discourse happens with freedom of speech vs censorship. Whenever someone wants to limit freedom of speech and push f…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 01:14 AM
11

From Wikipedia: "Discrimination is the prejudicial or distinguishing treatment of an individual based on his or her membership - or perceived membership - in a certain group or category." Clearly, having different prices based on gender is distinguishing treatment of an individual based on their gender. It is very plan and simple. This is how insurance companies work. I don't of course argue against that. They would gladly charge men less if men did less damage in crashes, but that is not the ca…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 12:57 AM
10

If you think car insurance companies should be allowed to discriminate on the basis of gender then discrimination should be allowed across the board, not merely when the discrimination favours women. And yes, car insurance companies are discriminating here. It doesn't matter if they (or you) have valid reasons (to some people) for the discrimination. The point is that the law should be constistent. Either it's okay to have different prices for genders in one service or product, or it's not okay …
/r/MensRights10/10/12 12:06 AM
3

Creating an egalitarian movement would (at best) result in a "power structure" of 50% for feminism and 50% for egalitarianism, which would mean that in practise 75% of time/money/resources would be spent on women's issues. Feminists are not going to drop their cause in favour of egalitarianism. I think the preferred route ought to be to create a men's rights movement to match the women's right movement. If there will ever be an agreement between these movements, the end result would be an unifie…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 05:18 PM
2

Interesting to see the journalists casually writing 'testosterone-fuelled young males', but you never see 'hormone-crazed women' used in news articles.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 05:43 PM
1

I've made a page with a few statitics (related to relationships, dating etc.). Some of the stuff is in Finnish, though.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 03:07 PM
2

I got banned there quickly just by pointing out that men have equality problems too.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 02:43 PM
12

I think it makes a lot of sense. 100 euro fine to a millionare is nothing, but it can be a big sum to student etc. Of course, there's a minimum amount that everyone has to pay, which is 6 euros per day. The "day-fine" system is also the reason why the largest speeding tickets have been in Finland.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 10:07 PM
7

Just because something is legal doesn't mean it's not a social issue. There are many ways to discriminate people legally, having genders roles which harm men and women etc.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:20 PM
8

You could easily make a show with the reverse concept but I very much doubt anybody would care. There would be some contention from women's lobbyist groups and we would sit here and tell them they're being ridiculous. I think the reaction would be a lot severe. In fact, the show wouldn't be made in the first place for being so "chauvinist".
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:18 PM
1

Of course I agree that Akin's comments were offensive and stupid.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:37 PM
16

Uninformed politicians shouldn't make uninformed decisions. It doesn't matter what their gender is.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 10:04 PM
12

My problem with that comment is that it would never be made about women. Male politicians are always belittled for being uninformed, females are not. Besides, the greater point here doesn't make sense. Just because a politician belongs to certain gender, race or religion etc. doesn't mean they shouldn't regulate people outside their own gender, race or religion. Of course, "health care decisions" can be interpreted as "personal decisions", but all health care regulations concern "personal decisi…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 09:56 PM
1

It's definately MRA-related if you claim a man is a jerk for not picking up the check.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 12:56 AM
5

So wait... you think the category of women who expect to be paid for is a subset of women who want to be asked out. No, but there is a subset of women who expect to be paid from the subset of women who want to be asked out. So, what's prohibiting the "average guy" from getting to know someone enough to tell the difference before asking? In the original thread it was assumed that guys mostly won't get asked out even by women who don't expect to be paid. More and more women are asking guys out the…
/r/MensRights17/08/12 12:49 AM
7

Way to go making assumptions about me. I'm not talking about my preferences, I'm talking about the reality a lot of guys face. They don't have the luxury of losing out 90% of their dates, as that most likely leaves them single. I personally won't pay for my date's dinner. I'm not interested in women who think the man should pick up the check. And the check has been split in all my dates so far. I actually care whether or not the person I'm dating expects the man to pay for the dinner or not. Bes…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 11:18 PM
8

If you don't want to pay for dates, don't ask. It's really that simple. And that might make you lose 90% of possible dates.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:52 PM
10

I'm not asking upvotes for my comments. I linked to the thread which also includes my comments, and I submitted this because I thought it was interesting. I think the confrontational person here is you, actually. EDIT: I'm also banned from that subreddit, so it's pretty difficult to continue discussion there.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 07:17 PM
4

I didn't link to the post, I linked to the comment thread in the post which is mostly about picking up the check.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 07:00 PM
7

He also said: Not trying to be sexist, but from what I've seen women are generally better workers than men. He's also a drunk driver.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 08:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter