| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Men Are 20 Times More Likely to Get Killed during Police Encounters Compared to Women, Regardless of Skin Color - Gilmore Health NewsNever once have I have said it justified police targeting, however it can lead to an increase bias in those groups which would be one reason behind why a certain group is targeted more. You're just putting words in my mouth to try and create a point 😭 | /r/MensRights | 05/12/24 06:56 PM |
| 0 | Men Are 20 Times More Likely to Get Killed during Police Encounters Compared to Women, Regardless of Skin Color - Gilmore Health NewsWhere did I say police targeting was justified? | /r/MensRights | 05/12/24 06:53 PM |
| 0 | Men Are 20 Times More Likely to Get Killed during Police Encounters Compared to Women, Regardless of Skin Color - Gilmore Health NewsIf you actually looked at the first study, I think Table 2 summarises what I'm trying to say pretty well - the significant difference of the frequency of crimes says it all. You also said earlier 'females perpetrators have high probability of not getting arrested'. Assuming this was compared to men, the study you provided - whilst showing some difference - the difference is not 'high' at all which can be seen in Table 3. Also they used linear regression to calculate this which whilst maybe being… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/24 12:25 PM |
| 0 | Men Are 20 Times More Likely to Get Killed during Police Encounters Compared to Women, Regardless of Skin Color - Gilmore Health NewsThe first link is based on clearance rates which is different to targeting. Clearance involves the resolving of cases that have already been opened, whilst targeting refers to the response of a crime before a case has been opened. Both suffer from biases which could definitely be linked together but in this context they're separate issues. Also the individuality of the crime is a crucial factor in clearance rates, whilst targeting is more so on bias without the actual crime itself. The second on… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/24 04:06 AM |
| 0 | Men Are 20 Times More Likely to Get Killed during Police Encounters Compared to Women, Regardless of Skin Color - Gilmore Health News'more than people think' that's just an assumption based on your own thought, it doesn't mean they commit crime as much as men - especially violent crime. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/24 01:01 AM |
| 2 | Feminist want equality. So, are you ready for the real male experience..?The problems you have stated have come from evolution and societal norm. Men biologically are stronger so they went to hunt and protect, which most men now have as a natural instinct. Women biologically are more nurturing and have 'maternal instincts' when with children. Over millions of years this has been upheld as a societal norm (despite there being several exceptions over the last several centuries eg. women fighting in wars), alongside the traditional roles of a nuclear family. So why take… | /r/MensRights | 02/12/24 04:34 AM |
| 0 | Men Are 20 Times More Likely to Get Killed during Police Encounters Compared to Women, Regardless of Skin Color - Gilmore Health NewsBECAUSE men are more likely to commit violent crime 😭 | /r/MensRights | 02/12/24 04:24 AM |
| 0 | Why are women always potrayed as rape victims in medieval studies while the rape of men is ignored?It's mainly because the biggest cohort of male rape in the medieval times (and now) is men on men. Male rape was very covert, homosexuality was condemned and sinful due to the influence of the Catholic church, so no man would ever openly admit to raping another man. The victims would most likely also be condemned as well, which can also be said today. And despite rape being considered a crime in some aspects, rape culture against woman was definitely (and arguably still is) more normalised and o… | /r/MensRights | 02/12/24 04:12 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter