TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nazadus Archive

View 0 posts and 45 comments by nazadus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This is true. This would simply be one of the very many issues she has. I totally understand people have preferences - but a very large chunk of women aren't simply talking about preferences. They act like little children in elementary school.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 08:00 PM
1

When I point stuff like this to my sister - her response? "Not all women" and I am super quick to say "sure, but enough women" and let me tell you - she gets fired up when her own feminist words are used against her. She knows good and well I know how to use her own language against her. She gets lit up when I do that. It's amazing to watch.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 07:58 PM
1

Oh, good to know!
/r/MensRights29/10/19 02:14 AM
1

I mean, they aren't wrong though. It's shown in the movies that no matter how you alter the time-line -- the direction, for the most part, doesn't really change the future's result overall. At this point it's pretty dumb to keep re-making them. They'd be better as a comic, I think.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 06:28 PM
3

Yes, actually. Keep in mine there are two types of generations. The old school and new school. Additionally there's a third but I'll get to that later. Old School: Your grandpa. The kind of "gentlemen" you're thinking of. New School: All is equal Third school: A bizarre mix of new and old where women, and only women, benefit. I have lots more opinions but they aren't political correct.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 08:03 PM
1

No offense, but this is me and my wife. I handle the "man's work" and she handles the "women's work" --BUT-- that doesn't mean we can't handle each others shit. If I'm sick, she handles my stuff and if she's sick I'll handle hers. We also communicate what kind of work we don't mind versus what we don't like and negotiate. I'm a socialist at heart -- so I help everyone in every way I can. I am not a perfectionist and stomp my feet when people don't help me when I understand we're in a capitalist …
/r/MensRights26/08/19 08:01 PM
3

My GF asked me why the Gillette ad made me so upset. I like this. She asks why it upset you. She doesn't (seemingly) mock you for being upset or put herself on a pedestal. It bothers you. She doesn't understand why. She wants to know more. You enlighten her. This is how being progressive is supposed to work. Let me use another example: "Merry Christmas" -> "Happy Holidays". Person: "Why is saying Merry Christmas a bad thing?" -- "Because it's the time of year for many religions, so this includes…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 11:34 PM
1

Personally, I believe teaching men (and women, I suppose, since they shave their legs) how to shave should be taught in schools. Ultimately we should be given a double edged safety razor and a few blades. It's cheaper and better and, more importantly, it teaches people how to shave properly instead of relying on their parents teaching them or not teaching them. I'm more fond of this method instead of the government controlling what is and isn't sold. I do think we should somehow discourage using…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 10:43 PM
2

Smells like they took a few tricks from Blizzards Diablo PR team.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 05:10 PM
1

Razor I use: https://amzn.to/2RPGnxz Blades I use: https://amzn.to/2RwfjUQ Shaving cream (trust me, this stuff is way better than the cheap shit in a can): https://amzn.to/2FtoXRA -- fair warning, it's slippery as fuck so wash your hands thoroughly before holding the blade. Most information I procured initially from r/wicked_edge . Many videos can be found here: https://www.reddit.com/r/wicked_edge/wiki/videos Hope this helps. Once I had the basics I kind of went my own direction. I don't view s…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:08 PM
1

$30-40 Merkur. $10-20 for 100+ razor blades. Wayyyy cheaper. Also very portable. A blade is a blade and a double edge is a double edge. Weight can help though but outside of that there isn't any function advantage of a more expensive one. But you can find a cheaper butterfly one that'll function well enough for $20 and just get a box of 100 blades for around $10. So even the cheaper options aren't too bad.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:42 AM
2

I'll give you an upboat. I suppose when you're in that league of price range they must work rather well. Maybe one day I'll be able to afford one and give it a shot. Until then -- the old school method for my cheap ass.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:10 AM
3

If you want a clean shave, double edge is the only way as far as I know. I don't think electric shavers can compete against a blade. If you don't need to be baby smooth then I suppose nothing is wrong if you don't go cheap. Do you have any that you personally recommend or a specific one on your mind ?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:01 AM
3

I was once on Xarelto, Effient, and 325mg Aspirin. For those playing the home game this all but meant I was (effectively) a hemophiliac. Never once nicked myself. I watched a few youtube videos and followed those instructions. Basically -- go at the angle they show you and don't push down on your face, let the blade do the cutting not the pressure. Hell I even shave my important bits, if you know what I mean, with this razor. I'm no longer on all three of those particular blood thinners but I'm …
/r/MensRights14/01/19 07:03 PM
59

My dudes, go to an old school double edged safety razer. It'll save you A LOT of money in the long run and spend the money on the nice shaving cream like proraso shaving cream. It is, however, very sharp and can fuck you up if you don't respect it. Once you get a good razer, the blades are stupid cheap the rest of your life.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 06:52 PM
6

My response was "That's because as men we don't have a single legal right they can take away". You're not wrong. He starts to snicker that "Sure because as men we are so hard done by". He's mostly wrong in relation to reproduction but usually his response is usually in the context of history and how men are usually in control. So he's comparing 1850's males to now while you are comparing 2018's men to 2018's females. He's dismissing your argument by pointing our history because he knows he can't…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:55 PM
2

Your friend needs to, in this order, delete all his social media and then talk to a lawyer. No matter how fucked up or angry he gets: Keep his mouth shut. If a lawyer says otherwise, get a new lawyer. Don't fuck around with this stuff.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 08:13 PM
2

Sure it alters you but there was a reported increase in depression, anxiety, and a slew of other things that were notable in the test group over the control group. But nothing in life is a guarantee... so there's nothing to really tell you what affected you specifically.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 02:40 AM
5

Imagine this. You're married for 30 years. You raised 3 kids and got them through college. Your SO decides they are done in the relationship. They have 30 years of work experience. You have almost none in that relationship. Surely we can agree that it's not fair for one person over the other. So what's a reasonable answer? I might argue that they have a 2 year alimony chance to get caught up in life.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 02:48 AM
4

I know you're trying to be silly but that's history. History is "good guys" also doing fucked up things. There are plenty of American Founding Fathers who did a great service to his countryman but... was also creepy and did fucked up things.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 02:46 AM
3

That's the thing. There's a group of "good guys" that's simply shy that some women lead on and take advantage of (the women who date assholes then complain about assholes). There's another group that's entitled and bitter but are caught in the weird shy/aggressive stage (the ones that harass women and can't stand being turned down). But, for some reason, the people who use the term good guy don't understand that "good" is a revocable status, as you noted.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 02:44 AM
3

do not allow children to be exposed to porn Yeah this one I agree with, although not for the reasons stated above. What reasons do you have? From what I read there's evidence to support pornography has a negative impact on the brain. As someone who grew up in the 90's on an unrestricted BBS and then Internet connection and saw the vast pool of Internet Porn -- I wonder if I'm one of those people who have been altered.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 02:41 AM
4

This has been a lot of modern politics. It's a race to the bottom so they can dismiss everyone above them. Whoever has it worst "wins" and is allowed to voice their opinion and have it addressed. It's part of the reason the "first world problems" response is ridiculous. Dismissing people like that is pathetic in every way -- you might as well not be part of the conversation. The most convenient target is guilt ridden white men in Western society, and the result is hate speech like this. I had a …
/r/MensRights27/05/18 02:40 AM
4

Deserve to get laid and actually does get laid are two very different things, something I think your calculations didn't take into account. Kids don't deserve cancer yet they still get cancer.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 09:32 PM
53

If there's always better -- she should leave that royal marriage. Who knows what she'll be next!
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:45 PM
1

It's a tactic meant to make you defend yourself so they don't have to explain themselves. It points the spotlight on you. Luckily it's not as efficient of a tactic as it used to be because it's been overused. As a general rule -- act as if they didn't say that sentence at all. If there's nothing else you can respond to then their response does not warrant one from you. If, however, you can ignore and there's other meat to their response -- just act like they didn't say it. Either they'll get REA…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 05:07 PM
8

The black preacher immediately tried to make everything about him and how he was just a 'An angry white man' after insulting him. This is a common tactic people use, especially blacks. Curiously I have a black friend that pulled the same tactics. When I would talk about pussy pass he'd say "you're just still angry at what happened years ago" and I'd respond with "well, if that's all you have to contribute to the conversation then you're useless here.. or perhaps you have something more intellect…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 05:05 PM
6

I don't know -- I think it's more extreme satire. They find the extremes of feminism and mock them. Sure it's cringy because the extreme sexism _is_ cringy.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:28 PM
9

How do other lefties react whenever you bring up the Men's Rights movement? Usually fairly hostile at worst and ignored at best. Very rarely are they understanding. Now if they are left-leaning but also verbally say they aren't feminist then the odds go up that they'll be understanding towards men's rights but as much as they aren't equally active for women -- they aren't equally active for men. Have you had any success convincing any of your fellow liberals/progressives/socialists that we are n…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:23 PM
9

No. Gas lighting requires you have trust with them and they deny it. This is more like out-right lying. "I want X. I know you gave me X but I hate it." Gas lighting would look more like "I want X. I never said I wanted X, why would you do that?"
/r/MensRights16/05/18 07:06 PM
-1

I am not the person you are responding to. I think basically you're being ridiculous and pedantic. It's not unreasonable to assume they aren't lying. Sure, it could be proven that someone said it but it's a ridiculous request to have them recall the specific incident and link it to you unless they are making some kind of outrageous claim -- and in our instance the claim is not outrageous. The problem is that we get this accusation a lot. Can you prove it, outside of this post? Can you cite "a lo…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 06:40 PM
2

It's ok to be critical until things actually passed and we see the results. There's a whole lot of "may" words in the article. A lot of positive things _may_ happen. But you probably haven't been burned like some of the others have which is why you're positive. What I suspect the person you are responding to was implying was that until we change society, bills really don't matter. As in: sure, the bill can say men don't have to pay child support but will the Judges? Sure, men can fight it and pr…
/r/MensRights15/05/18 02:48 PM
6

I've seen a few funny female comedians. The difference was they weren't imitating men or trying to mock men in the macho way. They were appealing to women because they weren't trying to be masculine and grabbing their junk, like a man might. Trying to copy a mans routine and thinking it'll work for a woman is why 99% of the female comedians fail. The female comedians that I've seen succeed tend to avoid gender talks (with a few side notes of jokes about their period that only my female friends l…
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:32 PM
4

The problem is marriage makes a lot of things easy when living together. In fact simply having the same last name makes *a lot* of practical things easier.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 03:37 PM
2

Here's the problem, as far as I can tell. Women are expected to look pretty -- thus makeup, uncomfortable shoes, etc. They can change that *easily* at any given moment. Men, on the other hand, are expected to be successful and unrelenting. This isn't that patriarchy -- this is society as a whole. You can't just change success on a dime. You don't get successful as easily as you can change some clothes or get cosmetic surgery. And until women change their attitude about that -- don't expect thing…
/r/MensRights13/05/18 03:36 PM
20

If we need a "special" court due to the complexities of consent then it's, in no way, straight forward and no reasonable human could be expected to follow the rules of consent then. At which point sex is a weapon to be used against others.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 02:09 PM
1

And now you're twisting words. At this point I'm convinced you're arrogant and malicious. We are done here.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 02:08 PM
0

You are maliciously misunderstanding the point and, now, trying to throw around a claim that you're have an "honours degree in psychology". That, alone, tells me you don't understand math as well as you probably should since statistics and data is a whole other category. You are either proudly arrogant or proudly ignorant and refuse to believe you have any chance of being wrong. I hope you can learn to correct that for the sake of those around you.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 02:55 PM
2

Actually, it's very much like laundry, depending on the type of data. People can be passively influenced on how to answer. You too can be influenced in ways that you aren't consciously aware of. So we start with some data. We ask how it was collected and such. Then we refine such methods. Are we asking the right questions? Is the question itself leading or can the question manipulate thought? How about the people we are collecting them from? That is how you "refine" data. You can, eventually, ge…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:21 AM
3

No. Just. No. We have to start somewhere with data. The video got the discussion starting but, sadly, with no real data to back it up (not really). /u/brettpkelly went all "nah, a few of these are wrong and here's what I can prove and here's how I think the video got the information it did". So the next step is to look at the data that they provided and see if it can be corrected in any way. Rinse, repeat until we have clean pure data. Sometimes your data can be wrong in very bizarre ways but we…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:56 PM
2

The phrase "Modern Feminism" doesn't really mean anything. In general it means third wave feminism. Feminism is regarded as three waves. First wave was about equal opportunity in the workforce (primarily). Second was about social equality ("Women have every right to be the same place a man does" in general). Third wave is "modern feminism" and is regarded as a superiority movement. Previous movements could be called equality movements because the phrase was often "we want the same X as a man doe…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 03:29 PM
15

Every graph that presents itself as representing data should always, ALWAYS, come with citations. Not just any citations -- citations on where the data came from and how the data was procured.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 02:41 PM
1

I dunno, I kind of view it as a video game. It came out and it was amazing. For women it was a much needed breathe of fresh air and it changed everything for the. With each patch it got better and better. And, like any good game, you associate yourself as a person with it. It represents you and you represent it. They finally finish the game, you took down the big bad guy. What now? So they sold it off to EA which began to run it into the ground. But, like WoW and many other games, it's still a h…
/r/MensRights06/05/18 02:11 PM
40

I've only had one female tech worker I liked and I trusted her as much as I would myself. The rest were lazy or liars/cheaters and used their sex to pass and skate through everything and, when called out on it, tried to claim discrimination. Luckily the companies I worked for were smart enough to document everything so when they tried with the lawsuits they didn't go very far. I'm pretty sure none of them took off of the ground. Worse -- when you every bring these up in public people get super d…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 08:00 PM
6

I'd be ok with middle ground. Alimony needs a small window to exist if one partner doesn't work. I totally understand its intent was that women don't have a professional career and expecting them to instantly get to work and make half of that income is unreasonable, especially if you've been married for, say, 20 years. I also think it should be based on locality and not a flat percentage -- but I feel the same about child support too. Just because you pull in 20 million doesn't entitle them to m…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 07:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter