needkneadkneed Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-1	Woman brags about body count, gets dumped (usernames removed this time) You guys know that slut shaming makes life harder for us straight men too, right? The more you slut shame someone, the less they will want to have sex with different people. Thus, the less likely you are to get laid. It’s kinda ironic. The people who are virgins or super horny are also people who are likely to slut shame people, making it less likely that they will lose their virginity / have sex more often lmao. You guys are playing into a feedback loop here	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/12/20 02:30 PM
1	Woman brags about body count, gets dumped (usernames removed this time) Your logic doesn’t really make sense there. Assuming you’re correct, and it’s much easier to get laid as a woman than a man, then that means that women, in your eyes, have more sex with a man than the average man has with a woman. If that is truly the case, then the “studliest studs” will have body counts much higher than this. The numbers have to even out. Every time a woman has sex with a man, a man also has sex with a woman. Thus, by your logic, the studs are getting all those women and the r…	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/12/20 02:24 PM
1	Oh, it’s not? The point is that the fear isn't made up	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/04/20 06:19 PM
0	Oh, it’s not? The fact that women don't ask for raises is part of the problem, though. I agree, women should be more assertive. But I think that once you do a little bit of root cause analysis (5 Why's, anyone??) you will find that the reason women are not as assertive is because men have historically controlled our society and society has historically placed an emphasis on women being submissive. Thus, women who ask or push for raises are viewed as more abnormal than men who ask for raises. It's easy to just…	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/04/20 05:12 PM
1	Oh, it’s not? It's not about what any particular person would or wouldn't do. It's about opportunity. They do not have the opportunity to invest that money because they don't have the money. That's why it's called "Equal Opportunity"	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/04/20 05:08 PM
1	Oh, it’s not? In the controlled group, that's an average lost earnings of $80,000 over a lifetime of work. Assuming that's 1,777.77 per year not realized over a 45 year period, and that if they did have that money they would invest it in an index fund, which have growth rates of about 7% per year, we arrive at a lifetime missed potential of: $507,911 That is a hefty chunk of change that each woman is not getting, on average.	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/04/20 03:23 PM
1	Oh, it’s not? See for yourself: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=s2002&tid=ACSST1Y2018.S2002&vintage=2018&hidePreview=true The BLS does an intensive study on this topic. You can scroll down and explore the numbers. They have it broken up by many different variables, including field of work. It's funny how you claim that you believe most people are dumb for citing a "discredited number," but you are the one who is actually citing false information. Edit: I would also like to link you to this payscale.com…	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/04/20 02:53 PM
1	Oh, it’s not? The 75% stat is based on comparison of data from men and women working in the same field in the same position. Do you think data scientists are dumb? They account for as many variables as possible.	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/04/20 03:06 AM