TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nelsonblaha Archive

View 4 posts and 150 comments by nelsonblaha on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

I love how they painted it up like an editor questioning it and the Evil Feminist doubling down
/r/MensRights17/02/19 05:20 AM
2

Well that's foolish.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 09:57 PM
3

Men over 33 are the useful ones even in that scenario... she doesn't have to personally wrangle together an Army to go fight. The useful old men running the country take care of that for her.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 03:46 PM
7

Yes. Boat-driving licenses.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:19 PM
5

Having a baby that could be a mass murderer isn't negligent, it's just bad luck. It would be negligent if a doctor told you first "if you have a baby, it has a good chance of being a mass murdering dictator".
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:18 PM
6

Got em!
/r/MensRights23/01/19 04:44 AM
-1

evidence?
/r/MensRights09/01/19 03:18 PM
-16

Don't be so surprised. The author of the comment could be the same person who screenshotted it and submitted it to Reddit for the karma. The story itself could be fake, unless you verified it. If you don't presume everything on the internet not from a cryptographically-verified known source is fake, you're gonna have a bad time. inb4 nothinghappens
/r/MensRights08/01/19 03:28 PM
23

ummm there are happily married people in this sub buddy
/r/MensRights03/01/19 11:04 PM
6

I have witnessed this resulting in a gender change.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 08:26 PM
10

Maybe he lost the kids for some very good reason he hasn't bothered to write on the paper? "All I need to know"... lol...
/r/MensRights13/12/18 02:52 PM
9

Yeah those two women, but for their cultural expectation to become wives/mothers, would much rather go down the mine and get the bigger paycheck those guys are getting. Sure, the men got maimed and lost their lungs eventually, but that was just the cost of making a living back then. Not sure being a woman in a position of obedience to a man for a cut of his mine income is better. If women had access to the mine jobs, they would have preferred it. MensRights has a point generally that men have su…
/r/MensRights27/10/18 05:08 PM
8

Are you saying you don't believe this victim?
/r/MensRights26/10/18 10:38 PM
5

Yep, classic case of Horny Powder, easily obtained on any street corner
/r/MensRights19/10/18 03:26 PM
13

Oh say can you see
/r/MensRights14/10/18 10:31 PM
-2

Girls are still barred from the Boy Scouts Airborne Infantry and all Boy Scout submarine crews
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:11 PM
3

If Kavanaugh were truly innocent he would prove it :-P
/r/MensRights20/09/18 08:48 PM
2

"It's not my burden to explain to you why the standard is different for men's rights"
/r/MensRights20/09/18 06:04 PM
4

Yeah, but does a criminal judge really get to decide that? My theory is that the state will revoke her teaching certificate any second and NY Daily News is stoking our outrage for profit.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 04:07 PM
1

I don't care what she 'deserves', rehabilitate her if possible. She's gonna have to stay away from kids the rest of her life, maybe that's fine.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 03:03 PM
1

Well, teachers don't take a vow of celibacy, so that ought to help. Maybe rape of children is nearly as wonderfully rare as it looks.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 03:02 PM
5

I'm guessing the teaching certificate revocation goes through different channels and hasn't happened yet, and NY Daily News saw their window.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 03:01 PM
4

It's wrong to presume a person is racist because they're Portugese, but yeah, if you know even a little history you know how ridiculous it is to suggest someone cannot be racist because they're portugese. Belgium has a particularly underrated record of colonial cruelty as well.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 02:50 PM
3

lol toilets and poop
/r/MensRights12/09/18 02:47 PM
6

As a man I get no opportunity to be pregnant at all and it's NOT FAIR
/r/MensRights04/09/18 08:58 PM
2

I wasn't prejudging the accusation as unfair, I was pointing out that many aren't fair and probing for details about the probable cause (or lack thereof) involved.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 08:39 PM
63

It's a hell of an accusation is all
/r/MensRights28/08/18 05:00 PM
57

Sure he's not just being friendly?
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:43 PM
3

Thanks, just wondering
/r/MensRights22/08/18 03:16 PM
2

Is it against Reddit rules or something to link to this stuff instead of using screenshots? Because I will always downvote screenshots. They're indistinguishable from karma-farming.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 02:43 PM
-5

But if you assumed they weren't before, and opened the door for them, isn't that your fault?
/r/MensRights21/08/18 04:09 PM
11

I hold doors as a genuinely altruistic act, expecting no reward or acknowledgment. You're completely entitled not to do it. I do feel a little sorry for you making a fool of yourself yelling at people who didn't ask for your help. Perhaps they were perfectly willing to open the door themselves?
/r/MensRights21/08/18 03:31 PM
13

Nobody has a 'right' to reproduce, because it requires two people to consent. You need at least one other person's permission.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 06:50 PM
13

Someone gave you an answer and it's fairly well upvoted. I think we're talking about all those things at once after all.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 02:11 PM
2

Not only will few people buy "the future is male", there will be a march and attempts to outlaw it. This I find much more interesting.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 05:20 PM
17

I don't think we should play along wit the public consensus. They're distinct phenomena and it's wrong and confusing to call them both pedophilia.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 02:01 PM
15

How about let's just get rid of the stupid registry instead of abusing it even more?
/r/MensRights01/06/18 09:18 PM
5

The judge will still perceive the leak and hold it against you in jury selection.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:49 PM
3

uh... so leak it to Fox? Whatever.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:46 PM
1

I think you might have misunderstood this post. It's not about google search results being anti-men because the users are anti-men and complaining about those users pointlessly. Google is actually preventing negative search suggestions about women from being displayed, despite our assumption that such searches are performed.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 08:00 PM
1

If it's not about your perspective, then why are you trying to convince everyone that your favorite men's rights issues are the only ones worth talking about?
/r/MensRights07/05/18 06:36 PM
1

Don't confuse being the most cynical with being the most right.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 06:05 PM
1

Al Gore
/r/MensRights07/05/18 06:01 PM
5

I don't know about others here but I feel like I've engaged you earnestly. Anyone's eyes can look dead and disillusioned given enough photographs to choose from, especially in mugshot situations, and especially when there's an opportunity to computer-alter the image, though that last one probably didn't happen in this case. You make yourself alarmingly gullible by believing you can 'see' character in someone's eyes, especially in a photograph. The result is that whoever controls the photograph c…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 02:21 PM
5

You're not very into science, are you? Look at it this way. If we fool ourselves into thinking we can spot crazy when we see ugly, ignoring our human tendencies to begin to really confuse those traits for each other, we will miss crazy people and falsely hate good ugly people. UNLESS it just so happens that your outrageous claim is true. Please prove it with objective evidence, and we'll all be on your side. Oppressive regimes are built out of people like you. Grab the enemy in the middle of the…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 01:55 PM
3

I guess she'd leave me alone if I left messes for later and went to play games, but I haven't really tried it. It would be unfair to any kind of roommate. I don't understand why you interpret such a contract as her being determined to deny me solace. I don't have to ask her to clean up because she's a neat freak, so no problems there. We have sex, have children, work on them together, and I get to play video games and travel too. Pretty nice living with a woman as my equal, believe it or not.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 02:30 PM
2

Plenty of couples game together. She just wants you to get a job and do some cleaning up in addition to gaming. My wife is as neat freak as they get and even she will leave me alone if I make the bed and do the dishes before I sit down for an evening in VR
/r/MensRights26/04/18 01:28 PM
3

Right? This sub is worrisome sometimes. I feel like it was more righteous a couple of years ago, when we'd bitch about legitimate discrimination against men. This is the epitome of extremism: now the majority of this sub believes ALL women are ALWAYS against ANYTHING for men? Funny how a community can change itself through circle-jerking. I'm skeptical of any Disney-style deeply antagonistic villains who love to be evil.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 01:22 PM
-20

Too far
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:46 PM
1

Finally, a reasonable post in this sub, no vitriol, just a good sound argument.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:17 PM
6

Make sure there aren't any cameras.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 08:32 PM
18

Nah it's "sexist" to insist that you be presumed innocent until proven guilty. You're already well beyond sexist in their minds, more of a sub-human rapacious monster.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:21 PM
2

A noble point; indeed you can never be completely certain that you're successfully anonymous... for all you know Lex Luthor implanted a chip in your eyeball and sees all. Reasonably speaking though, it's not hard to be extremely sure you're private. Find a place with free wifi, go there without a phone and avoiding cameras, boot up a laptop to a Tails USB and use Tor. Even if you missed a camera and it got a picture of your face, the chances of the best hacker in the world, or even the entire NS…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 08:38 PM
1

You can be if you want.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 08:26 PM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
/r/MensRights24/01/18 08:13 PM
38

Tacked on by a strawman, methinks.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 08:12 PM
107

Always believe the victim.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 04:49 PM
-4

You're one of those people who doesn't swim in the ocean, aren't you?
/r/MensRights11/01/18 11:11 PM
0

A negligible portion of mass transit scuffles result in a murder.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:59 PM
-2

Why do typing users get such grammar with Reddit?
/r/MensRights27/12/17 11:50 PM
30

OH SO NONE OF THEM ARE WOMEN HUH
/r/MensRights16/12/17 05:06 AM
-16

Even if it's not doctored it's horrible experiment design. She wears bright pink earmuffs, he wears some grungy dark stuff. Barring all the cultural associations it's still much easier to see how clean the pink ear muffs are. He looks like he might smell terrible.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 08:35 PM
2

That was a strange fight.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 04:30 AM
-7

Let's ban him
/r/MensRights13/11/17 04:30 PM
3

On the internet? Yes. I doubt everything.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 05:39 PM
3

TOTAL WAR KILL OR BE KILLED CHOOSE A SIDE No.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 08:40 PM
8

There are not health benefits.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 03:54 PM
-2

Dude. Calm down.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 03:54 PM
2

Great job
/r/MensRights10/11/15 03:21 PM
9

Because they've all united into the one SJW feminism you have specifically subscribed to lampoonings of?
/r/MensRights22/10/15 07:40 PM
1

How many times a day do you find opportunities to say "hot mess"?
/r/MensRights25/09/15 10:39 PM
3

Thank you for being honest.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 10:38 PM
0

You have problems, man
/r/MensRights23/09/15 01:14 PM
1

It's proof one woman is not disadvantaged in publishing. This is like using the Queen of England as an example speaking about women in general.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 06:44 PM
3

I know a similar case personally. It's sad... he's not the brightest guy and I have a feeling the adult on the other keyboard was writing with the goal of getting him to misbehave, with experience a child would be unlikely to have.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 01:21 PM
0

"It's refreshing to read a post from a sensible woman" implies that women are not often sensible in your experience. Based on your reaction, I suspect you didn't realize that implication.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 09:12 PM
-1

You don't think too highly of women, do you?
/r/MensRights06/05/15 08:58 PM
-3

Yes, it is wildly antagonistic. Why did you say it anyway?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:16 PM
1

Why Do You Capitalize Each Word In Some Of Your Sentences? It Is Driving Me Nuts. Just Use Normal English And Make Your Point.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:45 PM
1

A woman who votes for a hawk is as culpable as a man who votes for a hawk.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 03:18 AM
4

Downvoted for fake quote. We can't be doing that here.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 09:19 PM
3

I have a buddy who is Batman.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:18 PM
2

Evolutionarized?
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:14 PM
3

Projecting.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:29 PM
2

You exemplify butthurt by increasing your text size and wondering in edits why people are down voting you.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 02:04 PM
7

I SEE YOU BELIEVE YOUR COMMENT IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN EVERYONE ELSE'S
/r/MensRights25/03/15 05:28 PM
3

Perhaps an all-powerful local warlord would be more to your liking than the due process that made us a fantastically efficient and rich society? All that money spent on a court system is what makes it worthwhile to create a business. It's the primary difference between every developed country and Somalia.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 02:22 PM
17

Why do you feel it's better to permit physical violence when we can just as easily forbid it? It doesn't seem reasonable to me. What's to stop me from walking up to a stranger and shoving them for fun? I don't want to live in that kind of society.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 06:02 AM
-6

Oh, cut it out. This post displays the ignorance/misbehavior of one woman.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 02:48 PM
5

Making a point.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 09:48 PM
2

I can't see how this is related to chivalry.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 05:37 AM
1

Joyce M. Short has really weird hair.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 10:42 PM
2

Chivalry?! What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights24/11/14 09:44 PM
1

Academic performance, while important, is not everything.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 01:48 AM
2

I'm of the opinion that all parents should spend a lot more time than they do currently on their childrens' educations. Our society has become automated to the point that there is no excuse; many of us are trading what could be copious time with our children for weird luxuries like constantly-updated cars, smartphones, giant TVs, and wars. Despite the advancement of technology we spend less, not more, time with our kids. There actually is a good reason to aim this message explicitly at dads. Alt…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 09:51 PM
3

Among other complaints I could make about your position, I am extremely skeptical of the existence of a culture where it is "considered bad manners to refuse sex". My expectation would be that all cultures take sex very seriously (women in particular) due to the enormous consequence of pregnancy. Source, please. And if you can't find it, please consider revising your overall theory of human "nature" and what it means to a woman to have sexual interest displayed. You're giving Men's Rights a bad …
/r/MensRights02/09/14 12:44 PM
1

He raped her.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 04:12 PM
3

There are numerous contexts in which controlling a person's speech is warranted.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 12:20 AM
3

And most importantly, there are a lot of other very significant variables! A rich man has it a hell of a lot better than a poor woman when it comes time to give birth or get sick.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:19 AM
3

That's a good point. That's wrong.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 01:54 PM
-19

This is silly. Women had a hard time in 1913 with legal spousal abuse, limited privileges, and shitty childbirth death rates. There hasn't been a draft since Vietnam and most likely won't be another one. The only relevant point this makes in the course of an appeal to emotion is that our volunteer militaries are mostly male because of social pressure.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 01:21 PM
1

This is the best Reddit ethics conundrum I've ever encountered. Should an exception be made in the name of the greater good of confronting this practice among newspapers?
/r/MensRights10/04/14 03:23 PM
-3

What does DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR mean?
/r/MensRights23/03/14 03:27 PM
2

This reminds me of a new friend of mine who I challenge routinely on tumblr about gender issues. She recently broadcasted a request that MRAs of any kind unfollow. I respected her wish, but I consider it anti-intellectual to turn down interaction with people you disagree with on such a scale. Arguing is pointless, but reasoned discussion is not, and should always precede the hand. A point is often reached beyond which conversation is no longer constructive, but you can often learn something befo…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 01:45 PM
2

I'm sorry you're being downvoted. Your points are constructive, in my opinion, and bring up an important issue about the internet and Reddit in general. Even though I'm disturbed by the posts you've mentioned, I choose to use the comments to express my opinion and try to change the minds of other users. It won't do us any good to create a circlejerk of like-minded activists and talk about how right we are. That's all we're doing anyway: talking. I would rather see Reddit run on votes. If there a…
/r/MensRights17/02/14 02:37 PM
5

I dislike the post as well, but mods are not the answer.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 02:14 AM
5

what?
/r/MensRights02/02/14 01:03 AM
1

Can you cite an example of a men's group being prevented from forming?
/r/MensRights19/01/14 08:14 PM
-11

I'll switch some words in your first sentence to make a point: "If feminism doesn't fight for men's rights, that doesn't mean it doesn't care about men's rights." Which is it, should the [gender]-rights movement have posts in their subreddit about [other gender], or not? It is silly for /r/mensrights to get upset that /r/feminism doesn't want men's issues submissions, when we ourselves have no interest in women's issues submissions. It's a question of what is appropriate where. I agree that it i…
/r/MensRights18/01/14 07:08 PM
-3

I've heard it. I've also seen comments in this subreddit that I'm sure you would disagree with. r/feminism's sidebar says this about men's issues: "The definition of feminism is the struggle for gender equality. As such, we consider it necessary to acknowledge the existence, and the legitimacy, of men’s issues, and the need for a movement and a dedicated discussion space to address such issues." That looks consistent to me with the practice of marking a men's rights issue as off-topic. They beli…
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:56 PM
-5

This is the only such claim I find on their sidebar: The definition of feminism is the struggle for gender equality. As such, we consider it necessary to acknowledge the existence, and the legitimacy, of men’s issues, and the need for a movement and a dedicated discussion space to address such issues. No mention of /r/feminism being a place for Men's issues.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:53 PM
-6

You told me that MRM doesn't claim to fight for women's rights. I only assumed you're a member of the MRM, which is reasonable. We could get somewhere talking about situations in which a right claimed for men conflicts with a right claimed for women. It doesn't surprise me that a post that is simply about mens rights, and not how it conflicts with feminism, is considered off-topic in r/feminism.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:47 PM
-6

Who are "feminists?" Every last subscriber and commenter at r/feminism? Members of both /r/mensrights and /r/Feminism cherry-pick positions held by some members and contrast them with positions held by other members to create hypocrisy straw men.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:41 PM
-2

No YOU'RE a stupid doo doo head who thinks illogically. I win!
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:34 PM
-3

Are we talking about r/genderissues or r/feminism? Why are there no gender issues primarily affecting women on the r/mensrights front page?
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:33 PM
-23

So the complaint is that some feminists don't back the claims of other feminists that they should fight for men's rights? That's a pretty weak complaint coming from someone who has no interest in assisting women's rights.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:28 PM
-4

Let me break it down for you. Just because something is important in a general sense doesn't make it upvote-worthy or relevant in a feminism subreddit.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:24 PM
-36

How many women's issues do you see on the front page of r/mensrights? What are we complaining about, again?
/r/MensRights18/01/14 05:10 PM
1

Because it's foolish, maybe?
/r/MensRights18/01/14 05:01 PM
2

I've seen enough lists of terrible things attributed to Atheism to know this is not a useful way to judge people. My mom is one of the 70s feminists, represents feminism as I think of it, and has nothing whatsoever to do with NOW. You might as well dig up complaints against MADD and suggest that drunk driving should be legalized. Not everyone who opposes drunk driving is affiliated with MADD, and for that matter not everyone affiliated with MADD is complicit in their misdeeds.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 05:00 PM
0

Strawman. A collection of terrible things done in the name of feminism does not prove that feminists on the whole are doing terrible things. Atheists will be familiar with this problem.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 04:54 PM
1

Oh, comments on articles. Right on.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 04:52 PM
-17

Ah, like that time I submitted to r/feminism about puppies being murdered. They called it off-topic too! Feminists hate puppies! Your submission looks kinda lousy. Listverse?
/r/MensRights18/01/14 04:49 PM
-54

There's a difference between a feminist issue and an issue feminists should be concerned about as fellow people. I would've downvoted your post, too.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 04:42 PM
-1

Something tells me the comments are cherry-picked as well.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 06:11 AM
-2

I went to the comments of the top five posts in this sub to search for the word 'cunt' and didn't find any matches. Guess I won't be complaining that a vocal minority makes us look like a hate group today.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 03:53 PM
57

Never say "fuck you" to someone nurturing a persecution complex, if you want to have any chance of communicating with them.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 03:48 PM
1

Campus judicial systems have many similarities to those of high-corruption countries. I once returned to my dorm room to find that my belongings and my roommates' were perfectly swapped. It was hilarious, but I was alarmed that the prankster had simply asked for a key to my room at the front desk and received it. Everyone involved except the RA who gave up the key was punished for 'pranking' and assigned a disciplinary computer training course.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 12:27 AM
1

I don't think you know what tangible means.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 07:09 AM
1

Seriously? You're calling your enemies smelly? Feminism is not tangible. Feminists are tangible, just like patriarchs, "pigs", whatever names you can give to men who are jerks to women just for being women. They exist too.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 06:57 AM
3

"The feminist culture of victim worship" sounds humorously like "The patriarchal culture of _____" strawman arguments this subreddit generally questions.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 02:44 PM
5

Where is that the law? I only know Texas law, but there's a 2-year-difference rule here, IIRC.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 02:16 PM
9

No, not malicious intent! She just wanted what's best for the child!
/r/MensRights13/11/13 02:01 PM
2

I've thought about this problem a lot. A peaceful nation that doesn't have a draft in place is easily conquered by a nation that's willing to conscript, ultimately resulting in a draft. People organizing themselves into war machines is inevitable, but we can choose to keep our draft inactive as we have for the last 40 years. Hopefully it's never activated again.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 01:52 PM
0

I don't think you actually care about making any kind of change, so I'm out. Have fun trolling.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:34 PM
0

Do you deny that using the term 'moistened cunts' is likely to offend people who might otherwise feel sympathy for the movement? It seems obvious to me, but I obviously assumed too much about you. I think I'm being very nice. You're the one sending irrelevant Monty Python images that argue nothing more than "You are dumb." Again, I never claimed you called anyone a cunt. I was merely making a point about vulgarity in general. Notice that I've stuck to actual argument instead of calling you an id…
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:33 PM
1

If you want to talk about gists, my point is relevant. The issue is vulgarity that marginalizes our cause, and you employed vulgarity that I propose has such an effect. I think it's a harmful practice, a big help to keeping anti-men laws on the books by helping people dismiss the substance of our arguments. "He just hates women" I am asking you nicely (and with full respect to your right to speak) to cut it out. There's no purging of any kind going on. Whether calling a woman a cunt or using the…
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:03 PM
1

I never said you did ;-)
/r/MensRights05/11/13 05:41 PM
1

Nobody is trying to forbid any words. We're just discouraging them, one free individual to another.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 05:37 PM
1

You seriously misunderstand the position of many of us who object to coarse language. It's not that we want to censor you, or think you shouldn't be allowed to say ugly things, or even that it hurts our little tummies to hear it, it's that we believe you're hurting the movement by saying it, and we're speaking our minds, trying to warn you that you're hurting the cause. I am an advocate of total free speech, including 'hate speech', but that doesn't mean all speech is productive and helpful. It'…
/r/MensRights04/11/13 01:53 PM
1

I'm not trying to purge you, I'm trying to reason with you, right now, toward the furtherance of our common goals, despite our general political stances. That's how shit gets done in the real world. What do you think calling a feminist a cunt is going to do, reinforce her belief that MRAs believe all women are cunts, or cause her to look at herself and say "gosh, I really am being a cunt. Thanks for pointing that out."? Everyone here is united by their desire for change. We don't like children b…
/r/MensRights04/11/13 01:41 PM
2

Sad. I feel like this kind of behavior is the principal thing holding back the movement. Having this conversation makes me feel a little bit better about having my real name associated with my account. Respect is important.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 06:40 PM
11

Outstanding points. Thanks.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 06:36 PM
71

I'm sorry to say I see that attitude a lot, and a lot of 'bitch' this and 'cunt' that. Thankfully, it does get downvoted. It still depresses me to see it as frequently as I do.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 03:45 PM
1

So... why'd you delete the comment?
/r/MensRights02/11/13 05:11 PM
1

Your language is offensive, meaningless and, were I on the fence about Men's Rights, would probably cause me to dislike the movement. I realize you don't "give a fuck".
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:48 PM
5

They could just be a passionate opponent. It would be very dangerous to dismiss all counterpoints as trolling.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:51 PM
5

Even if it were true that self-reported data was considered reliable in the social sciences, it would still be a fallacious assumption. Can you explain why we should consider all reported rapes valid, rather than explaining that we are going to do it?
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:44 PM
14

I don't even understand what the charges are against the caretaker. Was he obliged to perform some kind of follow-up on the child's report that the guy in the next stall was looking at him?
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:41 PM
1

This is a tragic abuse of statistics. The author speaks as though her personal likelihood of death in childbirth is 3x that of the average white woman, but does not take any other information about her into account, such as her healthcare status (which I suspect is the real cause of high black maternal mortality). It's unclear what exactly the author advocates doing to correct this problem, but ACA addresses it directly enough, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 01:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter