TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

neoman4426 Archive

View 1 posts and 113 comments by neoman4426 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Your imaginary friend doesn't mean shit. "Boo hoo, Santa will put us on the naughty list if we don't condemn people hard enough". Fuck off
/r/MensRights18/05/22 10:49 PM
6

I suppose if the person was an actual one (probably just in the fetish sense rather than the unwittingly raising someone else's kid sense, no need to add insult to injury) it could be somewhat okay, but outside of a discussion where that's relevant it would still be pretty weird to call someone
/r/MensRights24/04/17 07:17 AM
1

Still years out from being viable so definitely would if it happened tomorrow or whatever (well, the additional pressure to develop it would probably speed up the development and banked sperm would increase the amount of time until it's critical, of course dashing the male ones against the rocks to maintain their utopia), but there are methods to generate sperm from female tissue (or for most methods the same technique could be used to get them for sterile males) that could be used once they're …
/r/MensRights13/04/17 07:11 AM
1

While they should have done it from the beginning instead of calling it just Ghostbusters (which was a very low thing on the list of things wrong with it) apparently it was always intended to have the Answer the Call subtitle eventually
/r/MensRights07/09/16 06:11 PM
2

All of those except the right to drive apply to men in the US? Men don't have a right to vote, it's a privilege granted based on being required to sign up for the draft (technically the driving falls under that too depending on the state), and the men as primary aggressor models mean that for abuse or rape men will in most cases either not be believed or be the one arrested if they try to report those, and most shelters for those will turn them away
/r/MensRights07/09/16 04:10 AM
3

Fucking Titania. That was the worst part (other than stealing Thor's name. Sam didn't go around calling himself Steve when he became Cap), it was so completely out of character for her, pretty much her main defining character trait is she can't stand the idea of anyone, especially another woman, being stronger than her
/r/MensRights28/05/16 01:41 PM
1

Or alleged before
/r/MensRights15/04/16 04:17 PM
1

I mean, the thirteenth amendment specifically outlines as a punishment for being convicted of a crime as an exception to the whole no slavery thing so that's not too surprising that prisons use it, barbaric as it may be
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:48 PM
5

Well, there is the whole break your legs and move the fragments apart slowly while they're healing thing, but no competent doctor will recommend/perform that unless it's severely effecting your life
/r/MensRights15/11/15 01:52 PM
1

Well, it's been considered a title a few times in the series. Originally it was one, and Donald Blake was the "real" one of the two, but then later on it was revealed /retconed that he was always Thor and Blake was a construct made by Odin to teach humility. Later on Thunderstrike tried to be Thor for a while, calling himself that, but pretty much no one bought that he was actually Thor. So never a title in a meaningful sense, but kind of was
/r/MensRights26/07/15 05:13 PM
1

Can't get the post itself back, but there's a site that archives comments, can get some of them back by running a Javascript code to load their cached versions
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:40 PM
1

There's also a chance, though it may just be theoretical, not sure if there are any confirmed cases, of the egg beginning a split when unfertilized but still remaining attached resulting in two eggs with the same maternal DNA being able to be fertilized by two sperm, which would result in a chimera blastocyst which if it undergoes a twinning split will result in twins that share all the DNA on the maternal side, but potentially none of the DNA on the paternal side in cases where it happens that …
/r/MensRights10/05/15 02:57 PM
2

Mostly. It's possible for monozygotic twins to have different DNA, usually resulting from a split that happens incorrectly for whatever reason. Usually those aren't viable and one ends up being reabsorbed, but occasionally will result in viable embryos. It's possible though extremely rare (on the order of only a handful of confirmed cases ever) for them to be different sexes even, such as one that would have Klinefelter Syndrome (XXY) if the split hadn't occurred potentially splitting incorrectl…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 02:24 PM
1

Including the one featured here if they're serious, if I recall they claimed to have a "delusion disorder" where they would randomly make stuff up and completely believe it, and took a picture from a news story about a ...kangaroo attack I think? And made up a story about a little girl being gang raped from it. At least I think all three incidents were the same person, I know at least the delusion disorder and one of the others, but not certain off the top of my head if that was this one
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:57 AM
4

To be fair that's the same logic the pro spy on everyone people use, "if you've done nothing wrong you have nothing to hide", or that people who exercise their fifth ammendment rights are automatically guilty. I think paternity testing should at the very least be opt out instead of opt in, but the logic that you're automatically guilty if you don't cooperate is just as wrong in this instance as any other. Should be required (with the alleged father having the right to waive the test if they wish…
/r/MensRights09/04/15 03:47 PM
4

It's one of those posts where instead of a standard album it uses comma separated IDs in the url leading to "first image, second image" links at the top. Third image explicitly says "Do it for your grandma " on one of them, extreme bottom left, closest to the camera
/r/MensRights13/03/15 01:50 AM
1

Something like that yeah http://imgur.com/VUx9Q1G
/r/MensRights20/02/15 10:06 PM
1

There was one who went to Haiti for the earthquake relief, got raped, and blamed herself/thought she deserved it for being white, he was just lashing out against oppressors
/r/MensRights20/02/15 11:27 AM
9

Not only that, but it was completely out of character for Titania to do so. She goes into a rage any time it's implied another woman could be stronger than her, at least somewhat due to her being particularly weak before she got powers (was born premature, never quite recovered), which is why she's a perennial She-Hulk villain
/r/MensRights15/02/15 08:36 AM
3

Fun fact , the word translated as rib in the Adam and Eve myth would be more accurately translated as "bony part", with one leading hypothesis being that it was referring to a baculum or "penis bone" as a just so story by that subset of our ancestors to explain why humans don't have them but a lot of other animals do
/r/MensRights03/02/15 11:29 PM
3

Which color?
/r/MensRights02/02/15 03:02 AM
1

As in if it were available as a print copy or as in if it were available on different readers?
/r/MensRights27/01/15 05:10 PM
2

How do you know zhe doesn't identify as urandom shitlord?
/r/MensRights24/01/15 01:49 PM
17

Adblock would prevent them from getting money for that specific ad, but would be counted as a hit to the page which will increase the value of the ad space (by a very marginal amount). With an archive link they only get one additional hit
/r/MensRights21/01/15 05:15 AM
1

I know Texas has a thing where if they're an employee of the school you go to it's illegal no matter what age the student is, unless the student and the employee are married to each other
/r/MensRights21/01/15 05:12 AM
2

Reddit interprets any line starting with a number and a period as part of a numbered list starting at one, with double newlines breaking the chain. Escaping the period like so 2\. (Double escaped so what is needed to type shows, typing what is seen will not show the escape character, like so 2.) Or using a different denotation such as 2) will show the intended number without worrying about the interpreted formatting
/r/MensRights08/01/15 09:43 PM
1

Fucked up beyond all recognition beyond all recognition?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 07:39 PM
2

You should probably tell him he's using "humanist" incorrectly, unless he means that he prefers critical thinking and evidence over faith and doctrine. You know, I knew the definition of humanist, but for some reason it didn't "click" with me that it's actually a pretty good label even if the people using it mean egalitarian, feminism is nothing if not faith and dogma
/r/MensRights24/12/14 08:11 PM
1

They're saying the ones that are for or apathetic are making the bad argument, not us
/r/MensRights24/12/14 05:36 AM
1

Dude, everyone knows, we just don't care
/r/MensRights04/12/14 10:29 PM
3

3b. If it is abolished it will probably revert to the last form it had if it is ever required to be brought back, at least initially
/r/MensRights12/11/14 05:23 AM
2

With a name like that and the views expressed I'd assign greater than 50% probability to them being a false flag intended to do exactly that
/r/MensRights22/10/14 11:07 AM
2

/r/talesofprivilege for a sub here based on the concept
/r/MensRights20/10/14 01:33 PM
2

Are they only required to provide both if they provide one, or is there a requirement to have both period? Like, if they don't provide a women's one (or a men's, but it's highly unlikely they would provide that and hit the other) are they compliant because people have equal (none) access, or non compliant because they don't provide either?
/r/MensRights21/09/14 01:18 AM
20

We are all misogynist woman-bashing rapists. -- ParanoidAgnostic Yep, checks out
/r/MensRights16/09/14 10:50 PM
1

Link is 404ing for me. What did it say?
/r/MensRights13/09/14 04:48 PM
3

Certain sects even posit that gay men are so because they're super misogynistic, that they only sleep with men because they hate women so much. I think it may be a subsect of the ones who advocate for political lesbianism, so that makes sense. They're "lesbian" because they hate men, and are projecting. (Note: no offense to actual lesbians meant by the quotation marks. Referring only to the fake ones from the political farce)
/r/MensRights12/09/14 01:08 AM
2

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. ATTRIBUTION: BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, Pennsylvania Assembly: Reply to the Governor, November 11, 1755.—The Papers of Benjamin Franklin, ed.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 06:15 PM
1

I think there may be other similar treatments that last less time, you may have heard of those and got confused
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:36 PM
2

"He never said no" would be the problem with the opt out model, not the opt in. If opt in is the law, you would have to get an official yes
/r/MensRights08/09/14 05:40 PM
2

Haven't read it myself yet, and didn't feel like finding a way to post individual pages, but here's the issue. Starts on page 244 of the magazine (264 of the pdf) https://www.dropbox.com/s/jv6aga5j20xu70v/GQ%20Magazine%20-%20September%202014%20%20USA.pdf?dl=0
/r/MensRights06/09/14 11:53 PM
1

Indeed. Probability of A given B != probability of B given A
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:46 PM
1

You can still see your own mod deleted comments, no one else can except from your overview page.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 01:55 AM
3

Am I bad for hoping she thought for a split second she was right and your daughter was referring to you, was feeling smug about it then it morphed into an oh crap face?
/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:00 AM
1

I suppose there's technically a nonzero chance that will eventually happen, but no, we never saw each other after that. Was a school band trip and she was from another band there for the same week.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 01:19 PM
2

Haven't read the article so I don't know the exact circumstances but it is possible to accidentally do in general. I was in a hot tub relaxing, the girl next to me leaned forward to get something from someone across from her, my arm floats over into the newly freed space while I'm not paying attention, she sits on my hand, pressure to the middle of palm causes squeezing motion, we spend the rest of the time until the tub closed apologizing to each other
/r/MensRights01/08/14 06:55 PM
1

Android Device Manager will only work if it's been explicitly allowed on device as an admin I think, it's opt in rather than opt out. If it's an Android and you know the login details https://maps.google.com/locationhistory/b/0 should work (assuming it's one with Play Services of course, but your solution requires that too) since on most devices location history is opt out, so if you just spam next like most do it'll be on
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:40 AM
0

Fun fact, there is no evidence post glacial Ireland ever had snakes. One common hypothesis is that "snakes" refers to the driving out of the Druids who used serpent symbolism
/r/MensRights26/07/14 03:00 AM
5

The woman isn't necessarily the mother though, a surrogate can use an unrelated egg. So while there is currently always a woman they talk to and stuff, she is not necessarily related to the child.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 04:55 PM
5

That can't be done yet last I heard. There are promising results in rats, but last I heard they haven't moved on to human trials yet and the rats were messed up, but once they perfect the technique there it's a possibility. A similar technique could almost certainly be used in male/male pairings to make ova, of course requiring at least one to donate an X and the service of a surrogate
/r/MensRights13/07/14 04:01 PM
2

Either that he killed or lost someone close to him. It's not standardized but I think filled or not and which side it's on are generally what the distinction is. I don't remember what the most common pattern is
/r/MensRights22/06/14 09:20 AM
3

I know Indiana at least asks for consent on the online renewal for the license
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:51 PM
2

Then there's Texas where AoC is 17, but if they're a student and you're an employee of the schools it's illegal no matter what the age. Unless you're married to them
/r/MensRights06/06/14 12:03 PM
1

Hasn't been successful yet as far as I know but I recall some partial success making sperm like cells from bone marrow derived stem cells in ... rats I think? Still several years at least off, but theoretically possible. Should be possible to make ova from a similar process, but in the case of male/male couples at least one would have to donate an X
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:15 PM
2

You've got the link markup backwards. Text goes in the [ link in the (
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:00 PM
4

Shit, maybe I still try to believe the best of people too much but I thought the poor girl comment would be referring to the daughter until I read the next comment by them
/r/MensRights25/05/14 11:24 PM
1

A pedophile is someone whose primary or only sexual attraction is to children, with said attraction lasting at least six months. In addition, child is defined as one who has not started puberty for the purposes of this disorder (do not wish to get in to if that narrow definition is applicable or not to wider usage). If he could father a child he has at least started puberty (baring something like artificial insemination via means of artificially produced sperm of course) so not a child in this s…
/r/MensRights22/05/14 01:39 PM
1

Reddit interprets a close parens as the end of the link markup rather than part of the link. You'll need to escape it with a \ and use a second one after
/r/MensRights12/05/14 08:05 PM
11

There's also 40 days and 40 nights. Supposed to be a comedy where a guy gives up all sexual contact for Lent, ends up being raped by his ex on the last hour or so, new girl blames him and he has to apologize to her for being raped. Ha ha ha.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 07:44 PM
1

That too yeah. First thought was driving since pretty much everyone does that but a much smaller portion actually votes/registers
/r/MensRights09/05/14 09:01 PM
11

Did you ever sign up for or renew a driver's license? Several states require you to "consent" to having your info shared with the Draft board before they'll issue one. Probably some where they won't even ask
/r/MensRights09/05/14 05:11 AM
2

That specific one matches OED though they may have several sources they pull from
/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:03 PM
8

/r/gonewildaudio
/r/MensRights11/04/14 04:01 PM
3

WWN was awesome, sad they discontinued the print version. I know the online version is still around but I haven't read much to see if they kept it up
/r/MensRights25/03/14 01:01 AM
13

I remember someone went around carving "Fucking sexists" and crossing out the not in "not the draft" on the posters in my school
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:22 PM
8

Even if the other things don't bother you you'll likely have to do it when you renew your driver's license since several states require you to "consent" to having your information shared with the draft board before even considering processing your application. Plus there's a good chance it already happened without your knowledge or consent, it's snuck into a lot of government stuff
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:19 PM
21

Obviously if we make them die too it would lessen their suffering since being forced to live after someone dies is the largest victimhood
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:14 PM
1

Texas also has an "employees of the school cannot as long as they're students no matter the age unless they're married" clause doesn't it?
/r/MensRights01/03/14 02:33 PM
1

You could also up or down vote, from your overview page there are links for liked and disliked. If you don't vote much that's another good way
/r/MensRights06/12/13 04:49 AM
6

Only if you use the device's default screenshot thing. Do a framebuffer pull? Copy the files from the hidden folder where they're saved until you view them and the timer runs out? (that one has been fixed in recent versions, but I think similar methods still work) Use a third party screenshot app or Snapchat client? All of those, plus probably quite a few others I haven't thought of can be used to bypass the flag. Granted most people don't know how to do that, but it's possible
/r/MensRights15/11/13 11:32 AM
1

Yeah, that's definitely a less desirable outcome of that change
/r/MensRights12/11/13 03:13 PM
1

I know they're taking steps to block the less obvious ways it used to be posted. I read that people used to use the steganography technique of hiding an archive inside an image (the PNG and ZIP specs essentially state that info after and before a certain part of the file respectively is to be basically ignored which allows one file to follow both). Tried it with some completely legal images (a picture of an actual cheese pizza containing copies of itself, thought that'd be funny) and it was reje…
/r/MensRights12/11/13 10:44 AM
22

If you managed to make it past the age without signing up, unless you got an exemption, you still can't get government jobs or stuff like that, anything that is restricted such
/r/MensRights08/11/13 05:35 AM
1

Skimmed the first read, thought you were saying you went on a date with your mom. Did a doubletake. Not an insightful or relevant comment I know. Think I need to get some sleep.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:11 AM
3

I unfortunately had to do it about a week ago. Had to renew my driver's license, got to the section that was basically "I consent to have my info shared with the Selective Service Board, and if I do not they will refuse to issue one". Not currently signed up according to the check page, but seems a matter of time before they enroll me.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 06:03 PM
5

Why this hasn't gotten a lawsuit yet I don't know. It has. It was ruled constitutional because women weren't allowed in combat roles. Obviously that's bullshit, but that was the ruling. Since that restriction has been mostly lifted and they're looking into how to integrate that current flimsy excuse will have to be dropped when one of the current ones makes it through the chain again.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 05:56 PM
3

Yeah, he had one of the forms of pancreatic cancer that was treatable if caught early, but decided to "treat" it with one of his all fruit diets and crystals if I recall correctly, by the time he got real treatment it was too late
/r/MensRights16/10/13 08:12 PM
2

If I recall correctly female Heroes in Fable 2 would gain muscle mass and become hulking masses just like the males when levelling up Strength and it was either changed before 2 came out or changed for 3 for that reason. Could be a decent place to start if I am recalling correctly
/r/MensRights15/10/13 05:55 AM
6

Looks like it's printed on a standard 8.5x11 page, would just need a decent image and a printer (and a lot of ink unless you invert the black and white)
/r/MensRights05/10/13 06:17 PM
2

Technically men still don't have the right to vote in the US at least, it's still a privilege tied to signing up for the draft while women have no such restriction
/r/MensRights04/10/13 01:09 AM
0

Depending on how "leave" is defined they could have a choice, all the players could walk the minimum distance out before they're considered "gone", make the reporters vacate, then turn around and go back potentially. Shouldn't have to of course and still a double standard but yeah
/r/MensRights04/09/13 01:34 PM
2

A bit of both. Fuck ton of different things can add to the note count, liking, sharing (well, reblogging but same concept), comments, etc. One person can easily add several notes, especially if they get into a conversation in the comments with someone as each one will add
/r/MensRights28/08/13 05:24 AM
2

Indeed. I've seen people switch it around to not be repeating phrases in a conversation and the person who used the "colored people" version was called a racist but the "people of color" version wasn't. Makes no sense to me.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 08:58 AM
1

I think I spend too much time there. I saw a comment on a different sub about a "PoC video" and was like "What the fuck is a person of color (still not sure how that's supposed to be better than colored person, but whatever) video?" for a couple of seconds before I remembered "proof of concept"
/r/MensRights24/08/13 08:15 AM
1

At least going by number of States. Has anyone ever gone through and figured it up by land area or population or anything? Likely wouldn't matter, but could be an interesting thing to know. Main reason people think it's 18 is a combination of the federal age for filming and stuff being 18 and most media being produced in California where it is 18
/r/MensRights22/08/13 03:51 PM
1

Second law is that they must obey any orders given by a human unless it contradicts the first law though (with third being preserve self unless contradicting the first or second). So unless they are convinced that them being harmed would cause a human to be harmed (I don't know, ricocheting rocks or something) they would have to allow themselves to be if told to.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:00 AM
1

Social Fixer has a button to anonymize the screen by replacing names with random ones (all linked instances of the name are replaced by the same name) and replacing the profile pic with the default one. That plus I'm sure whatever browser you're using has an extension or something to screenshot the entire page in one go should cut down on the hassle
/r/MensRights15/08/13 08:56 AM
3

Yeah, tongue one though that's usually written as :p
/r/MensRights01/08/13 05:56 PM
1

Not disagreeing with that, just a somewhat less ridiculous one. Five or ten percent less maybe? rough estimation
/r/MensRights18/07/13 11:21 PM
2

Benefit of the doubt, if I recall correctly most rooms aren't private, you have to pay more for those, etc so it's likely they're referring to the partner of the person they're sharing the room with rather than their own.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 11:06 PM
2

Which is exactly what I said? A lot of restaurants are shady and will shuffle around which hours were on which pay periods, lie about how much the person brought in in tips, or outright fire the server if they complain (possibly paying them for the time they're complaining, waiting a couple weeks then firing them for any minor thing) though.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 02:20 AM
1

I wasn't disagreeing, just pointing out that a lot of people don't know that legally they have to gross at least minimum wage
/r/MensRights16/07/13 01:47 AM
3

Legally the restaurant has to make up any difference between minimum wage and what's tipped+regular wage in the US. A lot of people don't know that. A lot of restaurants are shady and will shuffle around which hours were on which pay periods, lie about how much the person brought in in tips, or outright fire the server if they complain (possibly paying them for the time they're complaining, waiting a couple weeks then firing them for any minor thing) though.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 03:34 PM
4

For future reference, Reddit interprets any line starting with a number and a period to be part of a numbered list starting at one. Any lines that aren't preceded by that are assumed to be a new list, and any that are are incremented rather than showing the typed number. to have a different numbering scheme or start arbitrarily in the middle or anything like that, using a different marker such as 5) or escaping the period such as 5\. (double escaped there so it would show up, with one it shows a…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 12:22 AM
8

The number is for sexual assault, and the survey used used a ridiculously broad definition to the point where it's worthless. Things like a person slightly misreading the situation, going a bit faster than the person taking the survey was comfortable with, and reeling it back in when told/noticed it wasn't the right time would be counted as a yes.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 02:15 PM
2

In a sense that has already happened. Series four of the reboot, episode six "The Doctor's Daughter". She's more of a semi-clone since they took his DNA and shuffled it a bit for the two halves, but that's basically what you're describing. She dies at the end, but regenerates after he leaves. Not sure if they've brought her back
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:37 PM
4

You can only donate eggs a certain number of times in your life (I want to say reputable clinics will only let you do it six times, but I'm not sure if that's the correct number. I know it's really low), it's a much more involved procedure involving hormones and shit like that, and there's likely a much lower supply of women willing to donate
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:55 AM
7

It's odd, I hear people deride terms like "chairman" 'fireman" or "postman" as sexist, but I never hear those people say anything about similar terms that portray men in a negative light such as "gunman"
/r/MensRights02/05/13 03:10 AM
1

While the feminine form is technically dudine, that's considered obsolete with dude being accepted as a unisexual term most of the time
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:44 PM
8

Indeed. Consensual nonconsent can be hot, real nonconsent isn't
/r/MensRights24/04/13 03:11 PM
2

With someone under the age of consent, which varies from place to place. I'm not sure how many close in age exemptions or places with "mutual victim" status, but in the US in 38 States and DC (29 and DC have the baseline at 16, 9 at 17) he'd be over the baseline for AoC, while she'd be under it in all. I don't know if there are any that have a close in age of 15 to 17, and at least a few of the 12 who have it at 18 they could both be charged, California is 18 and I think it's one where both can …
/r/MensRights20/04/13 12:02 PM
4

You go to the page for it, one of the options under the dropdown menu is block app.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 03:14 AM
1

Other than Reddit formatting causing each point to be labelled 1 (any line starting with a number and a period that isn't preceded by same will be interpreted as the start of a new numbered list. for future reference, using a different denotation such as 4) or escaping it by placing a \ between the number and the period will cause it to ignore that.) that was... wow.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 03:51 AM
7

Quite so. Definitely not a smart nor ethical move on the part of whatever person or group is behind it for whatever reason
/r/MensRights08/03/13 05:40 AM
6

The probability of it being exactly what it seems is likely much higher yeah, precedent being the main point of the event if I understand correctly, just thought it an interesting thought
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:58 AM
0

Not saying it is or it isn't as I don't know, but I wonder what the probability of this being a false flag operation intending to do just that is.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:20 AM
3

California being 18 is probably one of the main reasons people think 18 is the age country wide, most TV being made there and stuff like that. As for 18 and 16 being fine, they may not prosecute in most cases, I haven't looked into that, but if my reading of section 261.5 is correct that would still be a misdemeanor, and both people could be charged if both are under the age. I suppose there may have been an amendment to the penal code that I am unaware of that may have changed that.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 04:43 PM
2

Makes sense, quite a bit more common from what I've heard. I wish you luck with handling it :)
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:19 AM
2

Classical agoraphobia (fear of open spaces) or modern (fear of situations/places there's no easy escape from or something like that I think?)? Sorry if I'm prying, mostly just curious. I used to be classical until I forced myself to confront it.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:43 AM
0

True, but someone blatantly lying about what you said, even if it's on an account specifically created so it can't be tied back to your actual identity, is a bit hard to ignore. Which I guess means they win since the purpose of trolls is to get a reaction out of people.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 03:44 AM
1

Anything that disrupts their circlejerk is banworthy. I've had a couple of my alts banned for attempting to have a reasonable discussion about a couple topics
/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:49 PM
1

Indeed, the Salon article about that instance is what the OP link is
/r/MensRights04/02/13 05:58 AM
1

Over half of the states and DC have it at 16, but I get what you mean ;-)
/r/MensRights01/08/11 06:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter