TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

neonreplica Archive

View 0 posts and 114 comments by neonreplica on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

I meant that I wanted to see the methodology of the study that said 53% of stem grads were women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 10:41 PM
–

I'd be curious to see what the study considered stem. If the study's methodology decided to include psychology and social science as stem, it could drastically alter the results.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 10:17 PM
–

that's cool. Do you happen to have a link to the study?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 09:39 PM
1

Is psychology considered a stem field? Maybe what if psychology was removed?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 06:15 PM
0

it's a form of cognitive dissonance. If a female is 19, she's a woman when it comes to voting and getting a job but if she dates an older man she's a child
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 02:29 AM
1

No attention being given to the woman, no investment in anything that will benefit the woman, unlikely to deliver any value to the guy beyond instant gratification.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/22 04:17 PM
1

thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 06:11 PM
1

many women in this thread seem to worship themselves; they see themselves as these selfless martyrs in relationships. Completely delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 02:46 PM
1

Single, childless women are the happiest and healthiest subgroup of the population. do you have a link to a study that claims this? (not just an article) curious about the methodology that was used
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 02:42 PM
2

ITT: women see themselves as the "selfless heroes of relationships" while fighting an all pervasive patriarchy that indoctrinates them to subordinate themselves to the wishes of men. JFL
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 02:29 PM
0

agreed - the quote about "men being the focus of hetero relationships" sounds completely insane
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 02:23 PM
2

How were your claims measured? Not really sure it's the case tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 03:12 AM
2

This woman (a professor from the university of Ottawa) explains why she is anti-feminist. Her complete deconstruction of feminist myths of history can be found here.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 11:40 AM
2

As an older more established guy, I do this now, and it works much better for me. I'm very busy and usually only want the intimate company of a woman about once a week or a few times a month. I appreciate the wide variety of attractive women to choose from and it saves me a lot of time and money; relationships are much much more costly in that regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/22 02:20 PM
2

it's the women expecting a free lunch. They expect free alimony in exchange for nothing. If a stay-at-home ex-wife is entitled to money after the marriage, why isn't the ex-husband entitled to stay-at-home work after the marriage as well? The wife grew accustomed to financial provision which she received during the marriage, and is now receiving after the marriage- Well the husband grew accustomed to having his home-making tasks taken care of while working- why is his ex-wife not required to per…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 03:29 PM
2

because many of them have never even heard the term "marital resource" before singing a marriage contract. Most men marry without knowing what a marriage contract is, legally speaking. Also men often marry a woman while she's working, and then after marriage the woman abandons her career. At this point, most people would deem it highly immoral and cruel for the man to insist that his wife maintain a career. People also assume that it's "a good husband's duty" to lovingly support his wife while s…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 03:23 PM
5

it's rarely "common sense" to say that anyone should be "absolutely annihilated in court mercilessly". Yes, even for something as common as infidelity. A husband could cheat because he is morally depraved, sure, but he could also cheat for other reasons. What if his wife has become rude and unpleasant, and no longer takes care of herself? What if she changed and became selfish and completely disregarded her husband's need for physical intimacy, while still expecting monogamy? While this is still…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 03:14 PM
1

I say this as a man that doesn't recommend marriage to men, you are absolutely correct in your assessment. The problem is that most people, especially young men don't know that this is the purpose of a marriage contract: in the eyes of the law, it's a business agreement where the man and woman form a type of legal partnership, except the content of the contract focuses almost entirely on what happens to assets and finances of the higher-earning spouse if the partnership is dissolved; and there i…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 11:45 AM
-1

only if people who make false-accusations of rape and false-accusations of DV also be put on a public registry. Given the potential consequences to a victim of such a crime, it's entirely reasonable to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 06:22 PM
1

I'd rephrase that to just because a guy is tall doesn't automatically make him good in a fight. He just has more of a passive deterrent effect (in general). When people asses someone's danger level, probably one of the very first things assessed (of many) is their size. Granted this has the effect of "spoiling" the tall man since he rarely faces a challenge. So when finally challenged he (could) prove to be pretty meek.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 02:53 PM
1

this may not pan out as expected
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 01:11 AM
1

I think it could take more men off the dating market because men expect less from a relationship. If men can get enough satisfactory sexual pleasure from VR, AI and robots, I think many will abandon the pursuit of real women. These digital alternatives will probably come with exceptional features that will likely compensate for their lack of sentience and realness.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 11:35 PM
1

Disagree for these reasons - a cheating man can't produce a pregnancy from the affair and claim that his faithful wife is the mother and trick her into committing a huge sum of resources into raising the child - men who can cheat are often already attractive; i.e they've already put in the work to becoming desirable. Consequently, many of these men can cheat with minimal to no further resource investment.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 11:29 PM
2

I'm a dude in his late thirties and my interest in sex has dropped to near-zero. I've had many experiences with it and every time I found it to be underwhelming, strenuous, and more of like a physical exercise that made me feel like I was at the gym, while the girl seemed to enjoy it 10x more than I was (I personally believe that women experience more pleasure during sex, just my opinion though). I'm single now by choice and I don't think I'll pursue a relationship again. Looking back it really …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 12:01 PM
2

the idea that a man and woman must be the same age (or very close) is a modern, recent invention that isn't based on anything substantive. For most of human history, and outside the Anglosphere, age-differentiated couples have been the norm, and furthermore there are many real benefits to them. There are many people that would argue that couples should strive for a larger age-gap for long-term relationships esp marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 06:23 PM
1

thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 04:20 PM
3

curious can you provide a link to one
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 12:32 PM
1

based
/r/MensRights23/03/22 01:53 PM
1

I think you're close but not on point- while, sure, perhaps women need more emotional attachment to have sex, I think the real problem caused by high-n counts is that it more significantly compromises a woman's ability to pair-bond long term. If the woman can bounce from man to man quickly and frequently it seems like it will be harder to be able to stay with one man long term, monogamously to raise a family without cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/22 12:16 PM
26

it's cute how they (those that say that) actually think they'll get anywhere near those types of muscles if they lift heavy weights. it's very hard to gain defined muscle, even if you're a dude
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 10:26 PM
2

I think that the vast majority of times that women settle, they aren't really setting; they only think they are. They're actually just accepting that they're not as great as they once thought they were, and are accepting the type of man they are truly worthy of getting. This whole "setting" thing is just a product of women's egos being inflated by 1) excess online attention, most of which is non-viable and cannot be converted into marriage 2) excess praise and adulation from the media and univer…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 05:18 PM
2

agreed. You could argue that Hollywood is also responsible for painting a false picture of the world to multiple generations. I think the impact of movies on the development of people's minds, and their understanding of the world is heavily underrated. Think of the hours and hours of movies and tv shows you watched in your formative years, when your mind was a blank canvas, and you knew very little of the world. That should have a tremendous influence on your understanding. Hollywood paints a ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 01:05 PM
9

Probably to keep the price of sex higher. If some girls give it away too easy it lowers its value
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 02:59 AM
2

Do you think that might be a social or economical? In general, men have to keep working to remain attractive to their wives long term and thus keep the marriage intact. It's also more in men's inherent nature to commit themselves intensely to paid work. This would be the social/biological aspect. Economically speaking, this is also more efficient in terms of running a family. Have the higher-earning spouse in the paid workforce, with the other spouse at home or working part-time. ​ Marriages don…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 08:33 PM
2

I mean, most husbands come without status as well. You're not thinking of the right status. The status a woman derives from marriage primarily comes from the fact that she now has a man who is legally bound to her economic upkeep, and this will be upheld by the courts. This implies that she has proven herself desirable enough to a man, and worthy of this legal commitment. A married woman = a desired woman. A woman who has proven her value to her man; the man is so committed to her, so desirous o…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 03:22 PM
3

Women can get jobs for security and status Most jobs are low-status/no-status. Most jobs have moderate to low security. The "security" offered by an employer (i.e. a faceless corporation) is tenuous and very much condition-based, much more so than-marriage. Remember, jobs have annual performance-reviews and daily requirements. The company can be bought-out and re-structuring can occur quickly. A married woman never has a performance review and requirements are nebulous and undefined. I'm not sur…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 02:39 PM
4

Women can get jobs for security and status, and most already have them I think most of these women come to see that holding a job is a grind. A grind and lowers her standard of living compared to any married woman who gets to stay home while her husband works a high paying job that supports both of them. Obviously, not all woman find husbands that allow them to escape the working-life, but it can be for many women, or at least to work part-time at a low stress job while still having a high stand…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 01:41 PM
8

Marriage is a legally binding contract that forms a business partnership between two people, in the eyes of the law. What you describe is not marriage. You describe something that may or may not occur, to varying degrees, within an intimate partner relationship, based often on the subjective experience, values and personality of each person, independent of whether or not a marriage contract is signed. They are entirely separate things. Re-read your statement. You are describing a relationship, n…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 10:39 PM
1

Lol and you think women aren’t pressured to get married? Never said this. Also you're veering off track from the issue being debated: whether men or women benefit more from marriage. We're not arguing who gets more pressure to. There is pressure on both genders, but in different amounts, but it doesn't change the value of the deal for each gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 02:46 PM
6

Men keep proposing marriage because of the huge societal, cultural and religious history and tradition of marriage. Men get pressured and ultimatums from their girlfriends, pressure from their parents to get married and produce children, pressure from their religious institutions to conform. They are raised amidst popular stories, movies and religious edicts that the standard life-path involves marriage. ​ If marriage is so bad for men, then why do men keep initiating marriage C'mon, you know th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 02:33 PM
5

If marriage was such a bad deal for women and so good for men, why is it the case, that for the last half century at least, women are generally the ones that want to get married and men general don't? Why is it always the women giving ultimatums to get into a raw deal then? Are we to believe that these hundreds of millions of men and women are all confused? i.e. all the women can't see they are getting a bad deal and all the men can't see they're getting a good deal? This would be mass delusion …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 02:08 PM
20

Just as the wage-gap studies have been shown to use heavily flawed methodology, I'm sure these studies on marriage have as well. We live in a time where nobody wants to offend women, especially at universities, especially in the media. Again, look into the data sets and statistical methodologies. I remember listening to a lecture by Professor Janice Fiamengo and she stated a study, which made the claim that men live longer due to marriage, was comparing married men to divorced-men and that divor…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 01:42 PM
18

it's a bad deal for men, mainstream institutions would never dare publish any kind of study that would suggest that marriage is a bad deal for men, or that women get a better deal, because they don't want to offend women
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 01:05 PM
15

Making more money Remember what a married man must do: work to support the desires of his wife and needs of often 1 to 3 children. Think of the money needed. The house, the education, the healthcare, the food, the clothes, the recreation, the vacation, the home appliances, repairs, taxes etc etc Sure the man is earning more money? But where is it all going? To his wife and his dependents, and he's often working 40-60+ hour weeks. When he gets home from work his wife is nagging him to fix the roo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 12:57 PM
1

Disagree. Modern society may not realize it, but in sense, they worship the idea/concept of women. "Women are wonderful" is a fundamental tenet of the secular West that is unwittingly building a new religion without realizing it. Do you think, for even a moment, if a study was done on marriage that suggested or concluded that it was better for women (and that it was a bad deal for men) that it would be published? No, not by any mainstream publication trying to stay out of trouble. It would be hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 12:46 PM
1

is it the amount of time they spend trading and thinking about the market? the meme culture?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 12:35 PM
1

are they like the guys from wolf of wallstreet?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 12:33 PM
3

you say you are part of the profession- are you able to avoid those bad patterns of behavior?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 03:44 AM
16

what about young fighting-aged single women with no kids? They don't have to be on the very front lines but there are a TON of support, logistics and admin tasks that are needed to support a war effort. Why aren't they drafted for these roles?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 03:04 PM
2

over for sub10cels
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 01:47 PM
1

thin nose can understand....duck lips are ugh- how did that even become a thing?? I think most guys don't like the duck lips
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 01:46 PM
1

If marriage is such a bad deal for women and so good for men, why is it the case, that for the last half century at least, women are generally the ones that want to get married and men general don't? Are we to believe that these hundreds of millions of men and women are all confused? i.e. all the women can't see they are getting a bad deal and all the men can't see they're getting a good deal? This would be mass delusion on a truly grand scale. Are there "clear-thinking-people" or websites onlin…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 11:19 PM
1

What if the wife gets snarky and stops taking care of herself. Happens all the time. What good is that "unfettered access to sex and companionship" then? Then if you want out of the marriage it's time to pay
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 11:06 PM
1

They often get thrown out.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 11:00 PM
5

I understand what you're trying to say here, but respectfully, this is not true. It reflects a critical misconception about marriage that many people have: Marriage is a legally binding business contract that forms a legal partnership between two people. It has nothing to do with romance or intimacy. In the eyes of the law it is strictly a business deal. The points you listed are the potential benefits of being part of an ideal healthy intimate-partner relationship. They are not legally binding,…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 03:03 PM
1

Anyway. At a fundamental level, marriage (theoretically) provides a man with a steady supply of sex and with some certainty about the paternity of his kids. It also affords greater economic stability. Can't agree with this. I'd say that the fundamentals of marriage come down to what is in writing in the marriage contract, state marriage law and what is enforced by the courts. And all that relates to how how money and assets are divided between the spouses, particularly if they divorce. There is …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 11:14 PM
1

Why are you so invested in trying to convince men of the benefits of marriage? Aren't you harming women by doing this? After all, we're supposed to believe that women suffer from marriage and they are these selfless martyrs, sacrificing their well-being to get married while men have all this supposed benefit. Why not turn men away from marriage so that women can be safe and free from such an oppressive institution
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 09:53 PM
3

lol. K anyway I know you're probably a good guy and you're just doing what all us guys have been conditioned to do ("defend the honor of women"). It's all good. Just don't forget men's contributions to the world, and always be skeptical of the women you choose to pursue
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 07:18 PM
3

most of them were able to do something for humanity because some woman supported and inspired them. Totally baseless claim Women would have invented stuff the same way if they were allowed to study. Pure, unfounded speculation
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 07:04 PM
0

Modernity brought more alienation and loneliness, in a world without technology things were kinda easier Dude. Think carefully about this statement, look at history. It's absolutely brutal. The total disregard for human life. The toil. The entire days spent devoted to menial labor that could only result in barely eking out a living. The total lack of hygienic facilities and products of any kind. The advances of technology, thanks to men have spared us from all this made many here spoiled AF.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 06:09 PM
1

I'm not saying it does. Im saying it's thanks to men that the world is Not a bleak place.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 05:41 PM
0

Without women everything is sad, bleak it’s like being in jail, like a punishment LOL what are you on about. The world isn't bleak thanks to men. Men created the modern infrastructure, electrical grid, water treatment plants, plumbing and sewage systems, supply chains and biotechnology that has done much MUCH more to make things "not bleak". Without all this, your random thots caked up in makeup and yoga pants wouldn't mean a damn thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 05:28 PM
1

women wear makeup for themselves. they're not doing anyone else any favors.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 01:04 AM
2

How does this social pressure and expectation manifest itself? I frequent many public and corporate settings, I have never, ever heard anyone ask a woman to improve her appearance. Furthermore, doing so could get that person in trouble, and would alienate them from their friends and colleagues.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 09:55 PM
1

I spend a lot of time in public and around other women- I've never seen someone chastise or pressure another woman to look better. When does this happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 09:49 PM
2

Interesting. Does this exist in writing anywhere? Are there any job descriptions or employee handbooks that mandate makeup for female employees?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 09:47 PM
1

they feel like their natural face isn't acceptable How on earth do they arrive to this conclusion? This seems absurd. Women are 100% free, at all times, anywhere to go without makeup. Anyone giving a woman a hard time for not wearing makeup would be harshly chastised by anyone witnessing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 09:45 PM
1

What's crazy is that it doesn't stop at makeup. They can wear heels to increase their height by a few inches, padded bras, and are given massively more leeway in terms of the clothes they are allowed to wear in professional corporate settings
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 09:41 PM
1

Men are like a light switch. They turn on very fast. Agreed, but it's arguable that this has contributed tremendously to the continuation of the human race. Without a strong, constant drive to procreate in at least one of the genders, it's not obvious whether the human race would have arrived to this point. Yes, we know (and agree) that often this constant urge manifests itself in negative ways (rape, harassment, dick-picks, annoying behavior) etc, but this is widely known and gets lots of atten…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 09:35 PM
4

The Trophy Wife thing is a rare exception that occurs to a small number of exceptional men; I'm talking about the future effects on a large number of average/regular men. For these latter men, if sex-robot technology can reach a minimum level of satisfactory realism, these men may decide to pull out of the dating market permanently or for long periods. Sex robots could offer many things that human women could not, which could make the robots much more enticing and compensate for their lack of pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:47 PM
10

Many here will make the mistake of judging this future-day technology using present-day values and social norms of acceptance. As recently as the early 2000s, online dating was considered the domain of weirdos, misfits and social outcasts. Now it is massively mainstream and arguably even the preferred way of meeting dates. Online relationships continue to evolve at an astonishing pace. I strongly believe the same thing will happen with sex robots. In the future, as social dynamics continue to ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 07:32 PM
2

Can't disagree with you. This is why men need a close circle of other men (not their wives or girlfriends) to whom they can confide.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/22 08:54 PM
1

Am a dude, not in a relationship (by choice). Have been in a string of long-term relationships before. There are many positives to a relationship but I prefer the single-life. I consider myself RP-aware.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 08:29 PM
1

how long have you been single?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/22 01:53 PM
3

I think she was able to get lots of dates for 2 main reasons 1) she is originally a woman and thus knows how they think in regards to how they want to be approached for a date 2) the internet back then had not yet affected the dating market- women's standards were much more manageable
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 09:07 PM
39

another key factor is that she did not transition into an apex male- she transitioned into a regular guy with a regular lifestyle. This is a huge factor in the outcome. As a product of apex-fallacy thinking, she probably thought that becoming a man would give her the life of a rich, globally-connected CEO of multiple big corporations who looks like Chris Evans or similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 01:43 PM
17

I actually (as a "regular" dude) had my first foray into online dating in 2012 and, well, holy phucking heck has it changed. It's another universe now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 01:33 PM
21

I would say "he" did have one important advantage - having once been a woman, "Ned" probably had a good mental framework to use for how to craft his approaches, time them, pace them, and guide the interactions with women that lead up to him asking for a date. Surely he must have had a pretty solid advantage there.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 01:30 PM
11

I remember watching that video a long time ago, and I'm pretty sure towards the end she even says something like "oh it's way better to be a woman, you have more privileges" (or something similar).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 01:27 PM
1

You sound like a great girlfriend; I say this because most men with RP exposure feel they cannot be open about their feelings with their wives and girlfriends as this would cause their wives/girlfriends to lose their attraction to him, since he would be showing weakness.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 04:50 AM
1

why is this? am curious
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 04:39 AM
1

Yes, 100%. People will not lose the ability to distinguish between their robot companions and other people. There is no basis for this claim. If people had this problem, we would know already. When you go to the store and see a clerk, you ask them a question with the expectation that they will answer your question about the store. But outside the store, when you see a human, you don't start believing that they are a store clerk and that you're entitled to ask them questions. You don't expect the…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 06:29 PM
4

predicting the future is very difficult, no matter how well-articulated the prediction is
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 05:38 PM
1

You would try to rape them because you wouldn't have any kind of control learned before. No you wouldn't and this really is a baseless claim. People with robots would still be living in the real world and interacting with human beings and be able to tell the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 05:35 PM
10

Look to the rise of online dating to see the future of sex robots. When online dating first emerged, it was seen as something weird and bizarre and shameful that only a small minority of strange people engaged in. Now it's massively popular and mainstream. I strongly believe the same thing will happen with robots/dolls and AI relationships. Sex robots will evolve in parallel with AI and super computers. What does this mean? Well, in the not too distant future, you will be talking to your compute…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 04:58 AM
10

exactly. you gotta be playing WoW if you wann get da poonani
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 04:43 AM
1

same. But I think some prostitutes would go the extra mile and pretend (just a guess)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 04:30 AM
2

not necessarily. Web 3.0 and crypto/blockchain is spawning a new type of economy. If crypto-currencies really take off and become more widely used as a medium of exchange, new markets will likely open up for things like NFTs, digital real estate, AR/VR, play-to-earn games, defi lending, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 06:21 PM
0

I agree that crowds of strangers can be more welcoming and less suspicious of women
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 12:10 AM
1

Yes but what can an individual lonely woman access here to fix her loneliness?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 10:33 PM
5

how are lonely women supported by society? do you mean they don't face the same amount of mockery as lonely men?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 07:01 PM
3

For cat calling and jokes, I would ignore. For any thing worse (i.e. violence, aggression), at most, I would discretely call the police while keeping a large distance from the scene. I would not get directly involved, that is a fool's errand.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/21 05:52 PM
6

"No madame, my only friend is there"
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/21 05:38 PM
9

thats a fairly expensive way to try and piss him off
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/21 09:48 PM
1

They have it easier getting dates, yes. But let me ask you this, would you rather be a woman? There are pros to being a woman, but also cons
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 04:11 PM
2

Yep
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 03:17 PM
2

Sure but it's not like women are any better-mannered toward men either right.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/21 12:02 PM
60

I really dont think mens standards in dating are warped by porn. Men know the women in porn arent into them. Men dont have women from porn trying to contact them via social media, or right swiping on them on dating apps. In other words, men arent getting the (false) impression that they have endless options
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/21 06:52 PM
3

what will cause simpery to end?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 03:33 AM
2

when affordable sex robots/dolls come out
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 12:55 AM
1

With respect, although your father probably means well, I think he's operating on an old-fashioned rule-of-thumb. The idea that a man must be married by his 30s comes from the blue-pill-only era, where marriage was considered a central and essential part of adulthood. Society has changed dramatically, and marriage has proven to be an antiquated institution. Thanks to the internet, many more men are aware of how bad marriage is for men because of all the "hidden" laws that exist to benefit women …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 01:06 PM
1

The wage gap has been debunked for decades. Men and women pay into the same pool of taxes however men contribute to it much more, and women consume from it much more. In other words, men support (subsidize) women, in aggregate. It's a form of unpaid labor that men do for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 12:38 AM
1

Men are 50% of the population but pay 65% of the taxes; the disproportion is clear and simple. 50/50 vs 65/35 is a disproportion between population and tax-contribution. Your response, which is to say that groups are taxed in proportion to their gross income, does not negate the above-mentioned disproportion. They are two separate issues. Your proportion is (gross-income vs tax-paid), the article's is (population-share vs tax-paid).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 06:52 PM
1

By your logic, if a man and a woman share an apartment, the man should pay 65% of the rent because he earns more than his female roommate. Men and women share the same access to the tax pool. Men are 50% of the population but pay 65+% of the taxes. That is a disproportionate share of taxes, because the taxes aren't proportional to the population proportion of men. That is what is meant by "disproportionate share". Women pay less in taxes than they consume via tax-funded programs, in other words,…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 06:12 PM
1

Taxes are disproportionately paid by men. Men and women both pay into the same pool of tax money, yet men pay a disproportionate amount; the proportionality relates to the ratio of the population of men/women vs taxes paid by men/women. Men and women are 50/50 of the population, but the tax split is around 65/35 (men/women). Furthermore men are the only gender that pay net-taxes (they pay more than they consume from government services). Women pay taxes, yes, but they end up consuming more than …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 01:52 AM
1

Taxes (redistribution to women), societal and technological advances (created by men) that made society clean and safe and undercut what men offer women in a relationship. The welfare state offers provision/security that previously only another man could provide. It doesn't provide above average wealth or status though- so only those men who can are desired by women. Conversely the state does not undercut what women have always offered a man in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 08:56 PM
2

The issue of taxation is inherently anti-male since men are the only gender that contributes more to taxes than they take out. Women take more than they give. Basically all of society is architected to transfer money and labor from men to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 03:47 AM
4

You can't fault either gender for their preferences. They're baked-in, so-to-speak. BUT there are some important differences: You can change your weight but not your height, so this makes this difference much easier on women. Women are allowed to artificially inflate their height with heels (without suffering social consequences) to amplify the difficulty for men to meet the height requirement. Conversely, men do not (but also cannot) artificially lower their weight to make it even harder for wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 07:46 PM
17

Coming to grips with the reality of working a full-time job: it's not what it was cracked up to be. For most women it's a grind which subtracts from their health and quality of life. Working full-time comes with all sorts hazards to a woman's health: she is more likely to: sleep less, exercise less, eat less healthily and is more likely to rely on alcohol, smokes and medication to pull through.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 11:39 AM
0

The only way to do this would be to reduce 90% of taxation and redistribution in society, since women massively benefit from this over men, and this skews the dating market. Men are the only gender that pays net-taxes, and women are the gender that consume the majority of tax-subsidized services. If a woman cannot make ends meet, she can still rely on the government to provide her with welfare, subsidized housing, subsidized health-care, subsidized retirement etc. All of this is funded by the wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 11:30 AM
4

I think FDS represents a collective "lashing-out" or "revenge-posting" of a subset of women who became aware of (and offended by) TRP, and who wanted to "hit back" so to speak. It's a forum for them to vent their anger.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 01:18 PM
2

They may need to know certain principles about how to attract and keep a man they desire, but those principles would not be classified (or similar to) game.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 01:14 PM
2

It's because gender-roles are much more strongly enforced on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 01:03 PM
5

You made kind of an apples-to-oranges comparison so. You compared someone with a certified trade to an uncertified ''office-worker''. An office worker could mean a lot of unskilled labor, like a high-school graduate doing data-entry. It would be better if you compared a blue-collar profession to a white-collar profession like electrician and accountant.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 12:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter