TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

neostoic Archive

View 0 posts and 83 comments by neostoic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Ok, so men are better than women because they would behave more honorably in a convoluted fantasy scenario where nobody else in the world finds their partner attractive, but does not have the balls to ridicule them for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 02:08 PM
1

Whoa, way to change the scenario. You yourself said "no man wanted" and "in the world". That's quite different from some random guy saying "she's not hot" once. It's more like literally everyone you meet saying "eww you're dating that, lol" and you'll be laughed at by all of your friends, colleagues and so on.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 01:55 PM
3

You can't know that for every woman. You can't even know that for every man. For example, I personally wouldn't realistically date someone nobody else wants and I'm a man. I just don't need to pretend that I'm better than everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 01:44 PM
3

It's simple. I have a friend. Lets call him Chad. He habitually only dates women in their early 20s. He has an ex-wife with a child that he was with for 5 years. He has another ex-GF he had a LTR for say 5 years. Now he's dating another girl in her early 20s. If we try to build any kind of model, we'll notice that each chad requires multiple attractive women through his life cycle. The average here would be 3 or more. Sure, you can talk about "hypergamy", but the women here are not doing anythin…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 01:23 PM
3

Unwanted weight loss advice incoming: As someone who's currently weight cutting, and have struggled with weight in the past to some extent, I have some sympathy for you. In my experience while CICO works just fine as a principle and practice, for an average person with average responsibilities, sustained weight loss is nigh impossible. An average person just does not have the mental space\discipline or time for that. Still it's best to view weight cutting as a skill. You're gonna start absolutel…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 06:16 PM
2

Very nice work OP. People keep saying that "those aren't high standards". But statistically they absolutely are. Lets say a woman's prime lasts for 10 years from 20 to 30. While a high SMV man's prime lasts from 20 to 50. So, on average high SMV man takes at least 3 women in their prime from the dating pool over the span of his life. Then if we additionally remove single mothers\overweight\ugly women, we always and up with a pool in which there are multiple men competing for a single woman(in he…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 10:55 AM
1

What you experience is showing is that "you can get away with being a dickhead if you're hot enough". I don't many people would disagree with that. As for being a good person(which is not the same as being "nice"), the way I see it is that, while it won't help you attract a partner out of your league it would still differentiate you from your competition in it. So a 9/10 woman is not going to date the nicest 6/10 guy she knows(out of like 50), but she would totally date the nicest 9/10 guy(out o…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 11:00 PM
–

First of all, TRP is a narrative. In it our protagonist, the man, overcomes his challenges, gets the girl in the end, while the villains get punished. Who were the villains? Well, the feeeeemales of course. So the bitterness comes packaged in the TRP starter pack, right next to that feeling of moral superiority. This of course does not change the fact, that guys in their 30s may have legitimate reasons to feel bitter, just the same as gals.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 10:50 PM
6

Well, what's "a lot", numerically speaking? 50 percent of them? And how do you know? What I do know is that there are plenty of men who want to think that their accomplishments would make them sexually attractive to younger women at some old age. But you wanting something does not make it true.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 06:12 PM
1

No, men don't generally reach their prime in their 30s. Male attractiveness peaks at around 25 and then declines from there. I'm currently in my mid 30s. My dating pool has definitively shrunk from 10 years ago. I can still date women in their mid 20s but it already gets awkward with someone younger than say 23. And there's definitively a generation gap when it comes to conversing with younger people and for them you're just old and uncool. I usually have one or more women my age orbiting me in …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 05:10 PM
1

Well, the few times I've visited that sub it was all over the place, including plenty of people that would go "my gf didn't call me back yesterday, fml, foreveralone". So I guess I should add the qualifier that I'm talking not about the average user there, but about that(sizeable) part of the userbase that would also take offense to the "just improve yourself bro" advice, like the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 01:11 AM
3

It's not a bad advice. People are hypergamous, both men and women. Your average r/ForeverAlone user is looking that pure anime waifu, while he's, of course, not particularly attractive. That's a kind of hypergamy too, meaning "trying to find a partner who's more attractive than yourself". What are that guy's chances of attracting that waifu? And of course he wouldn't settle with women who are his realistic match in attractiveness, since those women would be not be very attractive. So, for anyone…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 11:11 AM
2

I think this notion, just like many such notions, is generalized from the experience of average looking women who are still on the market in their late 20s - mid 30s and there it is true. Voices of those who struggle with dating are heard disproportionately louder online, than of those who don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/22 09:42 PM
1

How do you know that? If it's your personal experience? Well, you can only have the experience of being a high value man, but you won't have the experience of being a low value women. Does it come from seeing ugly girls with guys way out of their league? Well, you can find ugly guys with girls way out of their leagues. The dating experience is not that different between the genders. If you're a 6/10 man, you won't have supermodels fighting for you, but you should be able to find a 6/10 willing t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 12:50 PM
1

The key word here is hypocrisy. A large portion of TRP content is "women bad" and people get addicted to being indignant and tend to really enjoy that feeling of moral superiority. But on the other hand, nobody wants to call out a member of their own tribe, so you can often spot people condemning women for behavior X, while ignoring men doing the same. This is not exclusive for men\TRP, you can see a similar kind of hypocricy in your weekly "what's your height\what's your weight" short men outra…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 04:36 PM
1

I think it may have been this one: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240186962_Male_traits_associated_with_attractiveness_in_Conambo_Ecuador Also, your own first link says it too in "finding a partner for marriage". I didn't say that you hit your career/material peak at 25. I meant the total attractiveness peak. By 25 a high value man would have his career path figured out, have some disposable income and still be young enough to party and be fun to hang around. Yes it would not be his pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 12:37 AM
2

I forgot to save that particular study, but there was one that found that men hit the peak of their attractiveness at the age of 25-26. Which makes sense from both the physical and the material\career side. This of course goes against the "revenge" narrative perpetuated by the more delusional TRP types.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 09:29 PM
2

Because TRP is a male indentarian ideology. Such ideologies routinely normalize moral aggression towards outsiders, while validating any behavior of the insiders. You can see similar behavior displayed by feminists, where insider behavior is praised, eg. Slutwalks, while outsider is shamed eg. toxic masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/19 02:29 PM
2

I never said that male desirability is based on career success. It's just a part of it. It's relevant when we talking about men peaking. Career is just the final piece of the puzzle. Women have no problem dating younger men as long as they moved to living adult lives. If you have a career and your own a place, 27+ women would have no problem dating you at 25. I've had multiple friends dating older women at 25. Actually it's the easy option at that point in your life. I agree that game is importa…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/19 11:03 AM
3

I get you. But when we're talking about peak male attractiveness we should focus on those. TRP is so focused on alphas for the same reason. And sure, there's a large percentage of men(majority?) playing catch-up in this game.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/19 09:53 PM
-1

I never said anything about "most men". I said "the most attractive men". And it's definitively a minority. Maturity is overrated. If you have your career set up and don't have any physical deficiencies, women would totally tolerate your immature antics as long as those antics not sabotaging those two previously mentioned things.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/19 09:34 PM
3

I'd argue that men peak at 25 in terms of total desirability. By the time they are 25 the most attractive men have their career secured and that's when their total desirability peaks. By that point those men are lieutenants in the army or working on their jd\md and so on. This career security in combination with some maturity and still being quite young makes the most attractive and that's why it's the peak. This does not mean that you personally cannot peak later, it's just that those men would…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/19 09:14 PM
1

Your definition of hypergamy is way too broad. The key word here is "possible". I'm pretty sure no person on the blue pill side would disagree with the notion that people choose the best partners possible for them. The reason why there's so much debate about hypergamy is that TRP postulates something else, that you failed to define. Under TRP women are not just aiming higher, but they pretty much ignore anyone who's not among the best(alpha) and then are willing to enter in non-monogamous relati…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/19 03:52 PM
3

I fucking wish. Rey, apart from the whole Mary Sue starter pack, has only one character trait and that is "missed her family".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/18 12:29 AM
1

I'm probably one of the few people who actually disliked that. They've made the First Order too hip. Would have preferred it being filled with boring older white dudes only. And you could get some good english character actors to play them. The Vader/Imperial officer scenes in Empire were gold.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/18 12:27 AM
4

I don't like shitty fairy tales. Honestly if the new trilogy was written like a Disiney princess movie it would have been a much better than the crap we actually got.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/18 12:22 AM
3

You're trying to prove that TFA is not written like shit because it is written like shit. Whenever you write a story you can make all sorts of excuses that would allow the hero to dispatch the dragon in the beginning of the story. It still would generally be a terrible idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/18 12:15 AM
3

It's not about Rey having flaws. Whenever people state that, they're just not being precise enough. What they want is for the story to have some tension. It's about a power balance between the protagonist and the antagonist. The new trilogy completely lacks any semblance of that balance. And not only Rey is a Mary Sue, but she's also the worst kind of Mary Sue. The first kind of Mary Sues is when the foundational hero of the story is just too powerful for it's own sake. The second is when a new …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/18 12:14 AM
3

Now, that we're using same definitions, here's the point you're missing - political freedom exists only to protect freedom the more generic, humanistic freedom. And it's possible to stifle that without touching the political one. I don't expect any moral stands from any corporation. But I have no sympathy for people who demanded or supported that firing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 03:14 PM
2

Alright. Let's say you live in a totalitarian country where you legally don't have some freedom. E. g. speaking against the government. According to you you still have your freedom, since being arrested for speaking against the government is just repercussions. This makes any kind of human rights legislation pointless. When we talk about freedom as a political concept, we mean freedom of doing something while being protected by the state.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 01:32 PM
1

That's a good one. Those laws exist only because people fought for them. And the corporate world is always looking for a way to scale them back.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 02:14 AM
2

That's a good one. Those laws exist only because people fought for them. And the corporate world is always looking for a way to scale them back.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 02:14 AM
3

To me it's not that professionalism still matters, but we are permanently pressed to be "professional" to our detriment. Want a vacation? Not professional, even the U.S. president thinks so. Professionals should not take days off, I've been told that by one of my bosses once. Leaving just 15 minutes after the end of work shift? Not professional. So, what's that "off time" you were speaking of? I fight hard for my weekend, vacation, normal work shift, and ability to voice my mind in good conscien…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 01:23 AM
3

You're correct, but this also says things about the whole system. Since people spend most of their time at work, it means that you can't really voice any unpopular opinions for the most of your life. And when you're not at work you can't either - what if your boss sees it? Someone decides to dox you? For that reason I don't have any accounts on social networks under my name, since even my music taste could get me in trouble. So instead of being people we get pressed into being cogs that have rig…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 12:30 AM
5

There was an early 20-th century psychologist called Erich Fromm. He was one of those real cultural marxist guys. His main idea was something called "freedom to". This is a good showcase for that concept. Even though you have technically have freedom of speech in modern society, it's a phony and society punishes you when you use it. It's similar with other freedoms. The feedback from this case shows, how little people actually care about those freedoms and the author was too correct for his own …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 12:06 AM
1

There are enough signs in this thread. You haven't even figured out that your "wants", as much as they are natural are in no way binding to the Universe. 2 girls out of 20 is setting yourself up for failure, even if you are a Chad. Even he gets unlucky sometimes. You should always message enough to have a couple of prime options and some backups.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 11:48 PM
1

There's this thing that follows out of TRP philosophy, that's kind of true, but does not get emphasized often enough. For every attractive girl in her prime there's a competition between multiple men. And we're talking about men who have their stuff figured out, carreers, money, e.t.c.. So, what are your chances, as an average looking guy who's still asking for dating advice from his mom?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 10:31 PM
2

I don't think makeup matters that much. Girl that looks good in makeup is going to look good in the morning without it too. As for fakeness, to me it's a complete turn off. I'd take a natural looking HB6 every single time. With this said - recently one of my friends mentioned a few of his favorite pornstars and of course I decided to do some "research". Didn't like any of them because they were all bimbo-looking. So, there are different tastes. Neither me, nor my friend would qualify as a Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 09:11 PM
1

That's actually a pretty interesting topic. The current push for romantic love and against such shallowness is a relatively recent development. I remember being surprised at Catherine from Wuthering Heights saying that she loves Edgar for his money(though she specifies that there are also other reasons). And Jane Austen is notorious for her obsession with finances. My best guess is that this change has something to do with more equal standards of living between classes nowadays. Also the advent …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/17 03:30 AM
2

You know who was a real badass woman? Leia. She stood up to Vader and Tarkin without any expectation of survival and tried to trick them to the end. Too bad that everyone hated that movie though...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 02:51 AM
2

No. There's a real issue here, but it's not the attractiveness. In our daily work lives we are limited by an omnious censorship in the name of "professionalism". Don't make some jokes, wear acceptable clothes and so on. Feminists just want to add some more stuff, to something that already exists and is quite prevalent. This is that lack of "freedom from" first described by Erich Fromm(that's a real "cultural marxist" for all you terpers). And it's not just that we're limited for most of our live…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 07:20 PM
33

I agree with you. Blue Pill cannot provide the advice you're looking for. That advice is "you can and actually should be an asshole, this would bring you females". That's the gist of TRP. And the gist of Blue Pill is "wow, look at those assholes".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/16 11:06 PM
1

"Don't look at this totally bad narrative that I can't and won't even try to disprove, look at my bullshit narrative instead". If you blame a large group for actions of a few of it's members, in this case men, then you should keep your claptrap closed when someone does this to some other group, like Muslims.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 12:41 AM
0

If I were in a debate on as to whether racism is good or bad, I'd have to read those articles. You can't discount any position just because it looks like something you'd disagree with. And in the end I'd be able to say why racism is bad, just as why TRP is bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/16 01:21 PM
0

So, all I need to know about DNL, is that some idiot didn't read him, because DNL has articles shaming idiots? Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/16 12:47 PM
-1

Aaronson didn't get arrested for being a sexist pig. None of you terpers have received an official disqualification from the womankind. The source of your resentment is in your own minds. Same with Aaronson. And same with that magnificent gentleman guy. As for DNL, there's a lot of advice that's common to both TRP and DNL. Trying to look your best and so on. Does this mean that since DNL gives it, then it's wrong? And TRP is wrong by giving the same advice?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/16 12:09 PM
-1

Wait, are you saying that Scott Aaronson's existence automatically discounts the existence of all those terrible men? How come? Is he the second coming of Jesus and thus he absolved all their sins? There's really no need to assume anything here. People who flock to "be an asshole" advice would, shockingly, behave like assholes. As for normal guys, they wouldn't go for this kind of advice. See how much mental effort Scott Aaronson puts into doing the right thing. People like this won't buy into T…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/16 10:42 AM
1

Maybe it's because he's just a decent guy trying to give some common sense advice. People have natural tendency to behave like assholes. TRP reinforces that tendency in it's followers, saying "yes, you should be an asshole, it would bring you more women". And this "asshole reinforcement" is what makes TRP popular. It makes terpers feel so good, that anything else does not matter, including the fact that a non-asshole would be more successful than an asshole terper in any dating-related situation…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 09:36 PM
4

The words are free. The girl has an option of either saying something that may be interpreted as an insult, or something sweet. Of course she would choose the sweet option. Welcome to the real world. Most people are careful with insults.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 05:27 AM
1

Omega sounds too badass.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 12:38 AM
1

You're conflating two different things. One is that TRP for some reason calls gammas "betas" and ignores the real betas, that is more or less average guys, who don't struggle that much in the dating market. They pair off with more or less average girls pretty quickly. That's the biggest part of the population. The second issue is your opinion that gammas should pair off with other gammas. I'd say that a gamma guy who works hard at following typical common sense advice has a shot with an attracti…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 11:24 PM
3

I'm not saying nothing can be done. I'm saying this particular way of dealing with rape is bollocks. One really egregious part is that article links to this as its reason why women don't report rapes. You can't just put equality sign between rape and domestic abuse. Cops hate dealing with domestic abuse more than anything. But rape is a whole different matter. Instead of reinforcing survivor fears of the police, feminists should try to persuade them to fill reports ASAP. And DTMFA for domestic a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 07:50 PM
2

I take for granted that a small percentage of allegations of any crime are false. Good for you, but it does not look like that the author of that article does. Rape is underreported, but the with other crimes is not that striking: From 1994 to 2010, the percentage of serious violent crime—rape or sexual assault, robbery, or aggravated assault—that was not reported to police declined from 50% to 42%. ... From 2006 to 2010, the highest percentages of unreported crime were among household theft (67…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 06:49 PM
1

One thing to add after seeing misinformation on Twitter: only about one in ten rapes reported to the police are referred for prosecution, but schools must support all victims. That means reporting to the police will be a dead end for most survivors, leaving them in particularly desperate need of alternatives. I like how the author never even tries to address that some of those rape allegations may be false.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 05:16 PM
1

The big thing here is that there's really no reason to think that those guys treat women like garbage. It's the opposite - they're usually so smooth, that they can allow themselves to be dicks sometimes. As for MIT guys, I'm always saying that there's a "wall" for men, that they hit in college and that's an example. So while they won't get laid in school, few years after that, they gonna have as good SMV as those bad boys, with the only difference that bad boys play the game more.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 08:25 PM
1

In committed relationships, women have some degree of control over sex quality since they they're able to select for an acceptable partner and then communicate from there. But casual sex, on the other hand is a gamble. It's impossible to know for sure, how good the sex will be. So if a woman goes for it, that implies that her standards for "acceptable" sex are pretty low. And if "acceptable" standard is low, then the "amazing" is not that high. In the end my point is that whenever promiscuous wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 01:19 PM
2

To correctly discuss nerd culture you have to define it first. It's always about dedication. Liking Star Wars does not make you a nerd. Star Wars is mainstream and always was mainstream. But if you're a 35 year old bald guy who wears slave Leia costume, yep you're nerd. Same with games. A lot of this debate happens over really mainstream games and people from all sides seem to forget that pop culture is always going to be as simple and inoffensive as possible to the broadest audience possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 10:19 PM
2

If USA was an Islamic theocracy, would 9/11 still have happened? Giving those guys "unlimited pussy" is just as realistic a solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 11:23 PM
1

Sorry for the late reply. I bookmarked this thread to reply later. Basically what you're describing is a normal thing that happens to more or less average guys. Think of this as a male version of TRP Wall. In high school you can have some success with girls your age. After it ends though, women get a much larger pool of perspective partners. While it's not socially acceptable for a 16 y.o. girl to date a 27 y.o. man, it's acceptable for 20 y.o, and a 26 y.o can date someone in his 40s. When you'…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 12:09 PM
1

Guys get told to Just Be Yourself and avoid TRP-tactics not because you're manipulating someone else and doing this is bad(duh!), but because manipulative tactics fails unless you have a good sense of the game. If you do, then you don't really need advice. If you don't you gonna crash and burn.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/15 05:01 AM
3

Ehm, dude, of course feminists don't have as much interest in helping you. Everyone, including feminists is absorbed with their own interests. It's kind of dumb to tell other people "fuck you, instead of talking about your interests you should only talk about mine". So let's see what feminst advice failed you? Be respectful? Well it's just pc talk for "don't be a creep". And I don't think that TRP says that you get women by being a creep. Feminist advice is hard to put in context, especially if …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 09:30 AM
1

Because we have something called priorities. This is something so fucked up that it requires our immediate attention. You having troble getting laid? Not so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 06:54 PM
1

Lol, speaking of being stuck somewhere. You can't even comprehend that you can't be a SJW if you believe in a just world. Because there would be no injustice to fix. I'm propose that you fucking man up and stop pointlessly crying like a baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 02:49 AM
1

One thing I find very doubtful about TRP, is equating high SMV with the ability to have casual sex with girls. It's not necessarily true. Sure, it's true for cases when you have really high SMV and push girls into it, denying them LTR. But here we're talking about girls who actively go for casual sex themselves. That's different. Usually SMV of a man does not really matter in this case. Girl just wants to get off, and if you're not a shining example of manhood, she's ok with it, because she won'…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 09:37 AM
1

Victim mentality again. Oh, I'm so poor, my only option is to date down and even those women reject me. Bullshit! You seem to think that going lower is a general principle of dating for men. It's not. It's an advice that's given to people who lack any self-awareness. In practice most men date somewhere around their physical attractiveness, NOT ALWAYS DOWN. Men GO UP JUST AS OFTEN. Basically if you're an average looking guy, nobody would be shocked to see you with a really hot girl, stuff like th…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 04:34 AM
1

Oh, now you're changing your theme again. Now you want to get hit on by women instead of doing anything yourself. Sorry, but this is just not going to happen. Most guys don't get hit on by women all the time. You have to have really high SMV for that. I've never said that unattractive women get no attention whatsoever, that's a straw man. I'm just calling bullshit on your model that says that ALL women are basking in male attention. In reality most guys are not that picky so they marry some aver…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 01:27 AM
1

We're talking about a specific situation here. I read FA from time to time and the ones who are real FAs, either have highish look standards, or they're stuck in the cycle of depression and are not trying much, or both. And both of those things can be really hard to manage. But in this case OP says he has no standards, he's trying and still can't get ANY girl. I'm really skeptical of that and won't believe that until I see it for myself. That is, I'm ready to believe this only if a man like this…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 12:06 AM
1

Most competing happens over a small subset of women. Those are attractive women in their 20s - mid 30s. There yes, you get a harsh competition, multiple men for a single woman. But if you go outside of that subset, the competition is pretty low. So if you don't go for a high competition zone, you can get a relationship pretty easy. Sure some FAer, if he's really-really-really weird, may get rejected even by most women there. And it's totally his right to avoid changing himself for them, avoid fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/15 01:13 AM
1

You seem to be having a hilarious instance of doublethink. Nobody, here is ordering you to change. I think I can speak even for terpers here. It's all as to what you want. In you original post and multiple comments you said that ANY woman would be fine for you. And if that's the case, then you don't need to change anything. Since we already established that you're a decent human being and also dress nicely, you just need to go out more and you'll end up with a girl in no time. But there's a diff…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 11:35 PM
1

Dude, you're awesome. I really enjoyed this topic. Because by posting here, you presented a great example as to what the Blue Pill has over the Red. And it's the lack of crippling misogyny. Before it was hard to explain what crippling misogyny is, in a few words, but here I present you a living example. A guy that wouldn't entertain any thought of self-improvement, just because those damn women have it too good. And his evils are not even real. In the real world, women spend a huge amount of eff…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 10:49 PM
8

Yeah, there's something really fishy in quite few of those "no women in tech" articles. You see this open hatred of the "nerd culture" of STEM. For some reason it's acceptable to tell this to nerds, while you get crushed for telling this to some other identifiable group. Those people are not building more inclusive tech culture, they're rallying society to build a more exclusive culture, that is, let's throw out all the nerds and let only the cool people in.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 02:28 PM
1

Oh, thanks for the example of shittiness. News flash: you guys can't have your traditional marriage and no alimony. If you're wife is Kinder, Küche, Kirche type you guys so desire, be ready to pay if you get divorced, because she pretty much wasted her life on you. Single motherhood and debauchery are not slowly becoming the norm. Go scare someone else. They are the norm for over 50 years here. Bolshevik Russia was pretty tame compared to what we have here. But you know what? You can always move…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 05:19 PM
1

And men are not rewarded? Sorry, but it's just as easy for me or you to behave like a shitty human being, all the while getting no problems from that whatsoever. Actually isn't that what's TRP about? You behave like a complete shit, while women somehow take the blame for it. The most recent divorces from my social circle happened because of men. A guy divorces his hot wife so he can freely fuck his even hotter colleague. A guy meets his old love, dumps his wife for her. The bottom line is that T…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 03:29 PM
0

And divorce is bad because? Because man should only meet a single girl, marry her and live happily ever after? Oh, terpers have such an infantile concept of happiness, I guess I should start talking to them like an 8 year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 12:06 AM
4

Sorry for breaking this to you, but settling down is the easiest thing ever. Even the average guys are doing it fine. "There aren't\won't be any LTR-compatible women" is an idea that only lives in very insecure and hateful minds, i.e. terpers.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 11:46 PM
0

That's what they're trying to pose as. And fail miserably at it. "Dem dum promiscuous women ending the world as we know it" is just not something a real player would care about.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 11:19 PM
4

I see another paradox. TRP encourages men to be promiscuous, all the while slut-shaming women. Isn't it kind of like shooting yourself in the foot? Less promiscuous women - less sex for you guys. Chad's still gonna get some action, but you, yes you, mister average terper, you're pretty fucked. There's no androids produced yet, and Allah's not shipping any houris to this plane.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 10:49 PM
1

Do they? I'm sorry but the only times I've seen a girl say that she likes nice guys, is when a nice guy pressures her into it. Instead of getting into a discussion and wasting her time it's much easier for girl to say "yes". Also not liking nice guys not equals being shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 09:40 PM
1

But here's a catch, since TRP alpha is sexually secure, he can have female friends. So while normally TRP preaches being sexually secure(lacking scarce mentality, e.t.c.), in this case this goes out of window. While TRP promises you alpha honors, it actually traps you as embittered gamma.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/15 10:36 PM
2

Tell them the story of David Reimer.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 08:59 PM
1

While there's no physical/sexual contact, nice guy treats the girl as his girlfriend mentally(in his own mind). So he is in a position between having hope, no matter how unrealistic it is, and having very real pain of being alone, of not having things go his way. And people do procrastinate painful things all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 02:23 PM
5

It's not the reason nice guys get rejected. Nice guying is a form of dealing with rejection. It's a denial of rejection. You still have that girl in your life, you still have a girl in your life, your not alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 02:00 AM
1

You should have elaborated more on the last sentence, because that really is a catch. Lower league girls are often just as bitter as the worst TRPer. So, when you're dealing with one, and she thinks that she can settle for you, it's not just that you're not physically attracted to her, but she also treats you like a complete shit. That's why going for unattractive girls is a bad idea even if you not that attractive yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 01:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter