TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

neotropic9 Archive

View 0 posts and 19 comments by neotropic9 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

What a psychopathic piece of garbage.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/17 01:05 PM
7

Is Lena Dunham the one who objects to Taco Bell and sushi being served at university, because it's cultural appropriation?
/r/MensRights18/11/17 10:13 AM
7

Some people think that the reason he was targeted was because he was pissing off the establishment.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 07:50 PM
29

Aaron Swartz was a prolific web developer and internet activist. He helped develop RSS and Creative Commons, for example. And he helped stop SOPA. He had a bright future ahead of him, and a lot of accomplishments under his belt. He had access to copyrighted studies from his university. He tried to share them, because he thought they should be available to everyone, and was then mercilessly pursued by federal prosecutors -faced with over thirty years in prison and over a million in fines- until h…
/r/MensRights13/07/17 07:44 PM
9

Careful. You don't want to get Aaron Swartz'ed.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 07:38 PM
20

I kind of feel like that might just be something you have to say in the current academic climate in order to not be thrown out of town. That's a politically risky paper to publish, and the authors need to protect themselves. Lip-service to the right sacred-cows is the way to prevent getting tarred and feathered.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 07:33 PM
2

Don't argue with stupid people. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 01:08 AM
51

I don't have a problem with cutting parts of the dick off but you shouldn't do it to someone without their permission. Do that shit to yourself. Don't cut off part of a helpless baby's dick. That's fucked.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:44 AM
1

Let's be clear on the terminology, and on the science. If we're talking about genetics, humans have two sexes, not "genders" ("sex" is the biological term, not "gender"). But this is speaking about genetics; If we're talking about phenotypes then it's a different matter. So it isn't accurate to say that there are precisely two sexes. We should decide first if we're talking about genetics or phenotype. "Sex" is the biological term, and "gender" is the cultural term. Gender norms are overlaid on s…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/17 06:09 PM
12

What people need to understand is that the battle for gender equality must necessarily remedy injustices done to both genders. It is not only unprincipled to correct only injustices done to women (it seems not rooted in egalitarianism, but rather in a self-serving attitude), it is also a strategic failure. How could we, for example, correct for the disparity of men in traditionally male roles, without also encouraging men to take traditionally female roles? The failure to reach gender equality f…
/r/MensRights09/01/17 06:08 PM
1

IIRC her job was to take the heat during a slew of unpopular changes. She was a scapegoat, or a fall guy. Boy, has she paid for it.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/16 07:41 PM
1

Segregation is not a good policy and it provably increases animosity between groups.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/16 04:16 AM
4

Apparently witch-hunts are okay as long as you are hunting for someone who is accused of something you disagree with. Apparently things like "rights" and "due process" are really more like suggestions that you should ignore if you are emotional about something. This whole debate is stupid. But this is what to expect when half of the argument has given up all pretence of rational thought.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 12:10 PM
3

That's why you don't rely on them making objective assessments, and you let them get angry. Their anger, curse-filled comments, and righteous forwarding contribute to the success of the video. If people make it to the end and see the point, well, good for them. As for the others, who cares? This is not about clearly and calmly explaining a theory to your viewers. This is about how to manipulate people using a video in order to make a point about a social issue. If you want to make an objective, …
/r/MensRights28/07/15 01:50 AM
19

No, it would be better to give the context after, since the context is the "punchline". The other advantage is that you will get really angry comments from the people who jump ship before the conclusion, which will only help gain publicity and further prove your point. If enough people get angry enough to forward it on, then it could go viral.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 01:26 AM
4

Diversity doesn't include men or white people.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 11:14 AM
6

Constitutional rights don't just apply to trials. They also apply to administrative rules.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 03:08 AM
8

Constitutional rights don't apply because it's not a criminal or even civil case. Constitutional rights apply if it is a government body.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 07:56 PM
2

In Canada we have an exception for such cases -I think it is called a "peer group" exception.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 04:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter