TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

neverXmiss Archive

View 1 posts and 265 comments by neverXmiss on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

ProgressneverXmiss/r/MensRights14/03/21 11:03 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

These need to be broadcasted, publicized along with their actions. They are supposed to be public servants but instead are leeches on the judicial system, the American tax payer and the American citizen. The public needs to be made aware of these injustices. Op report the judge to the bar.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 07:28 AM
3

Meh. Karma is a bitch. Abortion does come with increased risk of future miscarriages, abandoned single mothers. Choose with your wallet fellas, I personally wouldn't touch a woman who has unless it was a lifelife/death situation, it speaks volumes to her accountability to her decisions and attitude towards a relationship. Don't ever feel bad about dropping a woman who has for these reasons. Her body her choice? Her consequences too then.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 01:03 PM
-9

On this front, anybody who voluntarily joins should be able to. Draft not in play ATM. Because honestly you are comparing somebody for forced to join vs voluntarily joined, should be at least equal opportunity for said title, no?
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:22 AM
2

Even if true, she could have gone to the bathroom like normal people do.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 08:26 PM
42

Push for birth control for men has increased recently.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 01:13 AM
37

Sounds ok to me as long as men get sold custody of the child upon birth.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 01:12 AM
5

UK women are vips, not surprised
/r/MensRights04/04/22 11:45 PM
3

This is more redpill than men's rights. It's messed up sure but it doesn't really affect our rights at all. Fds is a waste of time period.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 10:11 PM
9

Why do you bother with fds though? Only one type person subscribes to that: crazy. The same kind of crazy most guys avoid.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 04:34 PM
52

You do know most there are either sub 20 year olds or single 30+ women right, whom are single for a reason right?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:48 PM
1

Nothing of value was lost. Remember kindergarten? Remember how girls acted? Yup they never grew up mentally from that point and moderate reddits of that caliber.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 08:12 PM
2

Agreed which is why I believe either both get abortion or neither does.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 02:56 AM
1

Did I say they can't be used for child support or did I say they can be best be used for alimony? Did you actually read any of it? It mentions no children whatsoever. While 2 papers want to tie it said laws, there's plenty that disagree. More over did you read sentence after the first one or did you just do what accused me of which was ignoring the contents of the whole post? Child support does have problems but being responsible for your children isn't one of them.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 08:37 PM
6

100% agreed. And if it's used for something other than the child then the support amount should be reduced accordingly.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 06:44 PM
4

Ergo why I stated the problem being how the money is spent. If it's used to take care of the child (money toward housing, food, clothes for child), then it's fine, however it can be abused with no checks or consequences.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 06:42 PM
-4

There's nothing wrong with child support. What's wrong is the funds being used for something other than child support. These arguments would work best against alimony.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 04:07 PM
1

My parents are Mexican. My father, for example caused much confusion at the DMV, hospital where i was born because of his long last name.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 04:18 AM
5

Cool put two people with hyphenated names. They have kids, do the kids have 4 last names? Repeat, do their kids' kids have 8 last names? Mexico already tried, its the reason for the joke/trope of having very long names.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 11:24 PM
1

Most people do. Ill stop trying to reason with you accordingly.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 02:43 AM
1

And you thought that a google search on 'women compromise' would demonstrate this? How odd. You are changing the subject here. I restated my previous statement. How is that changing the subject? roflmao. You said that women are working hard to meet men in the middle. I don't see it and you have presented no evidence that this is the case. If you want to qualify that as your opinion then we can just disagree. This has been discussed already. I won't repeat myself. The evidence has been posted. Yo…
/r/MensRights13/09/21 05:59 PM
6

That makes you an egalitarian.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 02:20 AM
8

The main reddit admins are sexist, what do you expect?
/r/MensRights12/09/21 04:29 AM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 11:42 PM
36

That or make it mandatory dna testing at birth. Cheaper, save the would be father time to divorce/leave, the mother doesn't have to go to jail or pay anything, saves court having to deal with it (court system full of bs cases as it is and everybody is happy except: the cheating mother. Now if there are willing spouses that wish to adopt knowing the situation, there should be a form to sign stating the father fully knows the legal responsibilities of signing the birth certificate and that they ar…
/r/MensRights10/09/21 07:36 PM
1

Obviously women need help to learn to compromise. You don't teach a fish to swim, there's no need for it. But to learn to ride a bicycle fish need some training. If women were already masters of compromise not a single site like these would exist, there would be no need and no point. Read it again. I stated specifically, plenty women are responsible. The word is "are" is word of current status. It doesn't preclude or exclude training or learning. Every human, man or woman learns, trains, grows a…
/r/MensRights10/09/21 05:34 PM
1

That the earth is flat was common knowledge. Ok this pretty much disqualifies you from making a valid argument. So there's some disagreement about the value of compromise. .net, .ly, xyz? Really? rrrrright. But most of these pages are women's sites, so I put it to you that women share some need to learn to compromise. I don't see any pages targeted specifically at men. Funny how my argument was that women compromise, and you have just admitted that most of these are geared towards women. What a …
/r/MensRights09/09/21 12:29 AM
1

This is common knowledge, just because you lack it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. There is a plethora of marriage counselors, books, and experiences that all speak to making marriages work require compromise. https://www.google.com/search?q=marriage+requires+compromise&rlz=1C1GCEB_enUS936US936&oq=marriage+requires+comprimise&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0i13i30j0i390l3.6064j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Ignorance is not a valid defense to the denial of this argument.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 04:34 PM
1

Just because you dont click on the link or dont google doesnt mean its not there. I provided one example. Your opinion on the matter doesnt overrule it or make it suddenly disappear.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 04:56 AM
1

The basic fact that 50% of marriages dont fail. https://www.insider.com/what-is-the-divorce-rate-2017-2 The fact you need a source, to confirm normal, reasonable people exist is sad.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 02:09 AM
1

Only way is to make everybody understand by having equal amount of choice. No exceptions. Either everyone has options or nobody does. Your organ shouldnt dictate your choices.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 12:32 AM
1

Still leaves reasonable options. Way more than men which is only 2.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 12:29 AM
2

So the only people who pursue not to carry a pregnancy is an irresponsible Yup. Because if they were responsible, she wouldn't of gotten pregnant.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 02:05 AM
0

We have barely seen title ix be improved in regards to social issues with men: that's it. Whether this sub is or isn't a hate sub (against injustice), wont matter. This sub along with any other man friendly sub will get quarantined and / or banned. It is inevitable. And we are supposed to have sympathy for feminists? Sorry that's a hard pill to swallow. I think men will end up letting nature take its course. Men have already stopped pursuing marriage, chivalry is down, mentorship down and yes, l…
/r/MensRights03/09/21 12:26 AM
9

Men have been playing the passive role, the agreeable role for the last 100+ years. All it has done is cause society to consider men as disposable. Their rights, fairness, not important. Men support the world, both men, women and children with inventions, grunt work, dirty jobs, dangerous jobs. Women specifically have no sympathy for us when it comes to fairness in deciding parenthood, child support, alimony etc. The world is in a literal uproar over women not having the option to end their pare…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:08 PM
9

No, it finally puts women in the same position as men when it comes to pregnancy and child support: no choice.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 08:30 PM
16

Her hypocrisy level is over 9000!
/r/MensRights27/08/21 09:59 PM
1

About strawmen arguments? Agreed
/r/MensRights07/08/21 11:21 PM
1

Roflmao check again webhead. My original is posted, the word savior is not there. I quoted your direct response to it which was the first usage. https://i.postimg.cc/8C2tQWYZ/Screenshot-20210807-134855.jpg
/r/MensRights07/08/21 08:47 PM
1

He is not your savior. The people should control the internet, no one else Try reading your own posts. This is my original post: Elon musk will take over the internet soon. He's way ahead in the future development of internet (through satellite distribution) He's definitely not a feminist not pc.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 10:18 AM
1

you implied it by calling him a savior Remind me again who used that term first?
/r/MensRights06/08/21 08:57 PM
1

Actually he did regardless of your opinion. He jumpstarted travel to mars. Prove me wrong: By all means named any Nasa human mission to mars, prior to spacex. I wont hold my breath. I never stated he saved electric car tech, i said it was non existent and definitely not mainstream, but nice strawman. I guess you need one. Feel free to keep the strawmans.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 06:55 AM
1

Your posts convey you dont work in the field. Ill explain. Internet speed is not available for at equal speeds, equal prices, if available at all in the country. The denial level is oustanding. Starting companies is not easy, paying for it is not easy. Space travel in the US was regressing until Musk stepped up, thats a fact. Electric cars were virtually non existent until musk showed up.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 03:34 AM
-2

The same people that picked trump? Deblasio? Biden depending who you ask? No thanks. It will take a century before the "people" decide to do something. I rather the technology move up the next 10 years, and then the "people" can develop based on the technology of that time. The "people" is the reason why the internet is not consistent accross this country, choosing crap senators which then are bought by greedy isps. Musk has been savior to space, electric cars, solar panel innovation so far.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 02:51 AM
0

And if all failed, except the phone lines wed revert back to dsl/56k your point? All innovation of technology has backups based on old technology. To state it wont succeed because the older technology was is more mainstream has been proven wrong by history regardless of your opinion or approval on matter.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 02:46 AM
6

Dude, I have a degree in networking and work in said industry. that doesn't give you control over content, only helps with distribution. Doesn't give you control over content? Yea tell me what happens if all the fiber/cable/satellite/phone lines and cell networks suddenly shut down, can the content provider provide any content? Fiber/cable/satellite/cell network = networking. Currently satellite is very limited compared to the others. Have you heard of satellites going down compared to cell phon…
/r/MensRights06/08/21 12:04 AM
12

Google used to be just a search engine. Amazon used to be just a book store. Those who control the networking, control the hosting. Since Musk is trying to go global, he will have at least a sizeable portion of the internet. Id say he has a pretty good shot.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 10:20 PM
11

Elon musk will take over the internet soon. He's way ahead in the future development of internet (through satellite distribution) He's definitely not a feminist not pc.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 09:30 PM
2

Cnn is not a credible news source though.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 04:48 PM
0

Lol.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 05:01 PM
11

You sir have married a unicorn. On behalf of mensrights we both hate you (out of jealousy) and salute you good sir.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 09:31 PM
6

Everything is roses, until you get divorced.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 08:45 PM
2

Respond postively, "Do you know I have nothing but love and support for you?" Kill them with love like your father has. She can say all men are evil but ask her if her father is the exception at the very least
/r/MensRights06/05/21 10:09 PM
8

So then shes a lesbian not bi if she hates men
/r/MensRights06/05/21 09:56 PM
4

Oh yes she will in assets. They will be taken away. Including house, car and any other items bought.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 03:01 AM
24

Sue both the school and her.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 11:04 PM
3

B Let it be. What goes around comes around. If their own offspring is that low in value, imagine what other things have low in value to them. People of that caliber take the easy way out regardless of whom they hurt or what consequences befalls on other people. All you can do is teach your children to avoid relationships with people that think that way.
/r/MensRights14/02/21 03:26 AM
2

Blood sample isn't a big deal, pregnant or not. This response is not from somebody who knows, it is from somebody who doesn't. Tread Cautiously.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 08:57 AM
1

He is an idiot for living in Canada, and believing the justice system was fair. Extended vacations are not living together.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 04:17 PM
1

No such thing, not for a couple that owns no property together, doesn't live together and definitely not married.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 06:57 AM
1

No. In the USA, you don't give somebody else your money on the account of having a boyfriend/girlfriend and breaking up with them. That's not how an actual justice system works. That crooked type of justice is only in Canada and maybe the UK. As I stated previously, if you are man, feel free to live in Canada if you think that is just. If you are an entitled woman feel free to go there as well, as you wont get your way in the US.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 04:53 AM
1

Yea thats called injustice. Had he not live in that country he would not have to pay either. He would pay either way. Feel free to move there if you think its so just. I wouldnt be surprised if some women found that country a haven based on their entitlement.
/r/MensRights16/11/20 06:10 AM
1

So? That doesnt entitle her to his money. But youre right, if you live Canada you are indeed playing stupid games if you are a man.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 10:34 PM
2

It doesnt matter. Its his money, not hers.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 06:49 PM
1

Where there is a will, there is a way.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 05:54 PM
3

Tthats why i said to take out your money and take it with you or through other means wire it out. Its things like these that turn men into criminals sadly, because it is essentially slavery.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 07:08 PM
5

Ergo one like japan. Its a criminal offence to have your money stolen but its still happening. If the dude leaves/renounces citizenship, you think he would give a crap sbout its so called laws regarding garnishment? Plenty of countries that wont hunt him for Canada. At this point not even committing suicide saves you, they still take away his assets and give it to the woman.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 07:06 PM
0

Thats assuming the ex stays and gets taken.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 07:02 PM
35

Injustice of this magnitude pisses me off too.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 10:40 AM
379

If I were him, this is the part where I empty all my accounts or wire them out of the country, quit my Canadian Job, renounce my citizenship and go to Japan or some other country that is not "tied" to Canada. Any property that I can't sell, and keep the money, I would burn it down. F that crap. A country that effs you like that, doesn't deserve you as a tax payer or as a citizen. Edit: Rip to that woman's sex life.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 07:39 AM
1

Thats why men just wont play at all
/r/MensRights04/11/20 11:15 PM
2

This will backfire both argumentatively and monetarily. Men will get paid more since in many cases they get paid less than women and it will prove men work more hours than women do.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 03:05 AM
7

They do if they kill someone. She essentially got this guy killed.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 03:29 PM
2

If that's true, the same is for flat women/fat women.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 12:40 AM
5

4)Reddit leans left
/r/MensRights27/08/20 06:09 PM
18

Given events, i wouldnt be surprised if she cheated on OP. Her body her choice, her consequences. Getting prenup was wise, hopefully it sticks in court.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 04:47 PM
54

The state wouldn't of sued if the mothers didn't ask for assistance. State doesn't, out of blue,do this. They do this to recoup money from social aid given to mothers.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 11:59 PM
8

Except he most likely killed another men's rights lawyer in California. Both murders involved a fed ex uniform.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 06:01 AM
4

Bro code. Honestly this is the potential of humanity. If everybody did this for each other, the world would be a better place. Build each other up, not break each other down.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 04:13 AM
6

troll account fosho. Just a feminist posing as a male.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 08:36 AM
2

If this happens more, this will become a wake up call. It sucks either way, but some things need to happen in order for change to occur.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 07:35 AM
2

You all misunderstand each other. You people have more flavors of feminism than Linux does. We look at you all from the outside and judge according to what we see. Go back to the fascist regime Reddit page and read. Go look at countries like Australia or the UK and just soak it up.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen25/03/20 07:58 PM
20

It's called hypocrisy. Either everything is feminism or it isn't. How about feminism police itself as to what is and what isn't feminism. You do that from within, not in here.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen25/03/20 04:46 AM
1

I think hearing women talk is worse than corona virus.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 02:14 AM
12

Lol. While girls give each other death stares for wearing the same outfit, guys give each other high fives. Apparently not giving a damn is male privilege, roflmao. This is what happens when feminists run out of legitimate claims of inequality.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:37 AM
2

I would find another job and in your exit interview state the reasons why you are leaving. If you find a good place, take your coworkers with you. She can be HR's best friend all by herself. If you don't leave, this is only the beginning of a toxic workplace.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 03:51 AM
1

Any person who follows this advice is in for a rude awakening.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 08:02 AM
3

Now businesses will leave California more. Good job democrats!
/r/MensRights07/03/20 03:07 AM
2

Keyword: Grasping at straws, Semantics.
/r/PussyPass02/03/20 06:09 PM
7

Taking the Browns to the superbowl. Old Biff: "You sound like a damn fool when you say it wrong"
/r/PussyPass02/03/20 01:56 AM
3

Funnily enough, most are privately owned.
/r/PussyPass02/03/20 01:50 AM
20

Clear case of mansplaining I think. /s
/r/MensRights18/02/20 06:58 PM
6

You sure proved my argument/me wrong: "I have more karma than you so i'm right and you're wrong" Typical w/ those contribute nothing to society except their karma level. Whatever lie you need to cope with the fact that you have no cohesive argument or anything to contribute. I tell you what, when karma level matters in a job resume, you let me know.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 06:46 AM
14

Gillette felt the burn, I don't see why Loreal wont either.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 05:56 AM
10

\\ Nobody gives a shit except people who are paid to \\ You have the wrong thread, manspreading, a/c sexism, and other VERY important topics from /r/feminism is that way--->
/r/MensRights04/02/20 05:55 AM
6

Considering most of them aren't even 18 physically much less mentally? What do you expect?
/r/MensRights07/01/20 07:16 AM
3

Keep in mind ppl that tweet these have a mental capacity of a 16 year old.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 08:07 AM
0

Give false accusations, should be legal. However, revenge porn should be illegal.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 07:26 PM
1

Bye Felicia.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 05:57 AM
1

Ah I see you saw my post =D.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen05/10/19 01:57 AM
2

Just say "I'm deaf in my right ear dumbass" the next time somebody tries to insult.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 03:38 PM
4

Double-standards applied here, proof?: https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/cez5ex/aita_for_thinking_my_wife_should_be_more_generous/ If it were reversed, he'd be TA if just asked to be LOANED the money to pay of his debt from the wife's inheritance.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 06:55 AM
2

I guess you can give criticism, but you can't take it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Go find a forest and get lost.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 06:16 AM
2

I mean with your double-standards (lack of criticism in feminist threads), you are a VERY neutral redditor. Your reasoning is VERY sound.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 03:27 AM
11

It's better than air conditioner is sexist.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 12:39 AM
0

If you really want to get under their skin as well have a place to have a voice, start r/realrape
/r/MensRights27/08/19 04:50 AM
1

I feel sorry for her mother.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 07:00 AM
1

I don't give a crap. Stating things that he didn't say, and then arguing yourself a counter is a Straw man. Prove him wrong properly or don't at all.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 05:41 AM
1

008 dammit. 008 was mentioned in spectre. Any other 00 would be acceptable and interesting since it would expand on the story big time.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 03:40 PM
1

It's the same thing Marvel did with Thor. It failed there, it will fail here.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 03:38 PM
2

Straw man arguments have no value habaneraSAUCE. You would know this if you attended one debate class.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 03:36 PM
1

Humanity* is the future. There fixed for ya.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 06:57 PM
2

She used to be a family court judge before being famous.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 06:55 PM
2

Dont you love phone autocorrect?
/r/MensRights04/06/19 09:20 PM
3

Google PayPal myth, check the studies, compare the data yourself, same exp, same education, same seniority at job, for the most part, gets equal pay. Check protests, check comments, how often do you see a feminist willing to discuss? Talk to people. It's the reason why feminist subscribers are so low even among women. People lie. Children are not the topic. That falls under child support. You shouldn't get a windfall. You already received compensation throughout marriage and that scaled with the…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 03:16 PM
8

In America, we are already there. If all variables are taken into consideration, there is equality for the most part. It is no longer an opinion, its a fact. Everywhere else? I don't know. Glad we agree. Trouble is, again, most feminists don't care, and will push for quotas regardless of proof of interest. Again slavery is illegal, men and women have free will and will do what they want, not what any movement wants. Too complicated, both should be removed for a period of time. Nobody should bene…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 04:52 AM
10

Virtually none. Both men and women with equal background, education, experience get the same pay. No handicaps. Then you will need to prove equal interest among all jobs/fields to justify said quota/s. Otherwise, it is an opinion and a communist/socialist one at that. If you want communism/socialism, you are in the wrong country. History has already proven these methodologies don't work. They wouldn't stay the same, both should leave the household. Given most men own said houses and paid for sai…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 04:32 AM
38

Child support accountability. Instead of cash, a debit / ebt card be given to the parent so the charges can be accounted for and made sure they are spent on the child. No parent has any problem supporting their child. The problem lies when it is used as a free for all bank account. equal time available for parents, specially if both parents live in the same city. Mothers have a monopoly on this. Voting rights for women as long as they sign up for the draft. Currently only men are stripped of the…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 03:40 AM
1

Right on target.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 05:15 PM
1

Oooo insults. Nice arguments you got there. You sure proved me wrong with your valued insults. And you are what you accused us of: just a child bitching about people online. Believe whatever lie you need, to pat yourself on your back. I don't need to prove anything I do or don't to a child looking for trouble.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 05:09 PM
3

Not from a feminist. If you are going to study rapport you must study all its aspects, not just the dogmatic views of the feminist.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 09:23 AM
10

I don't have to explain myself to you. - Same response we get from feminists that claim they help men's rights. tell you what, you came here, we didn't go over there, so what's your purpose/business here? to bitch and complain about men's rights online? Edit: That's what I thought: Silence. Thanks for illustrating how feminism is hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 07:56 AM
12

Because hey the media sure supports mens rights such as circumcision being outlawed, equal parenting rights and have ribbon days for testicular cancer right smart ass? Because hey, feminists don't come in here, like you, looking to get offended right? The difference is, we don't ban ppl like feminists crybabies do.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 07:37 AM
1

Same mentality in name of convenience, don't need to try. The parallel is there. Simple solution: birth control. It passed in one state it may go to Supreme Court again. Don't want pregnancy, then don't get pregnant. It's not rocket science.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 11:26 PM
1

You are just a cluster of cells, technically speaking. That zygote/embryo is still human. Your pov needs to be that in order to remove guilt from it. Same tactic as the Nazis when they wanted to change pov of Jews from people to vermin and proceeded to genocide.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 10:08 PM
1

Birth control is VERY accessible. Cheaper than abortion, it only affects those too lazy to go to the store or doctor to get bc.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:52 PM
1

Not in the discussion of the 99%. Lol you're complaining talking about subject a don't acknowledge subject b. Rape shouldn't happen and is a discussion within the context of crime.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:51 PM
1

haven't insulted you. Next time, think.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:49 PM
1

It's not a normal function of the body which is the context here. I chose my words carefully. Straw man arguments go out the door.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:48 PM
1

Again you can't be forced unless you were raped. Adoption is always on the table. Birth control is always on the table.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:47 PM
1

Blood clots are not normal. Disease is not normal.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:42 PM
1

Common sense. Conception is the first stage of human growth. A human is a human. Notwithstanding consequences of doing so de-values human worth, respect for the gift of reproduction.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:42 PM
1

Insults are very good arguments, oh wait....
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:34 PM
0

Comeback a bit delayed there a......
/r/MensRights17/05/19 07:32 PM
1

Lol.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 06:49 PM
1

You really need to stop looking in the mirror when you say things like that. People are concerned with your mental state.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 06:44 PM
1

Ah k. That s a weak argument against abortion.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 06:43 PM
1

Whatever lie you need to tell yourself to cope with the truth. Bye bye.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 06:40 PM
1

Plenty of people use nature to make arguments. The main argument is that you can't be forced or be a victim of your normally working biological functions.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 06:37 PM
1

When you mentioned celibacy. When the debate is lost, slander is the tool of the loser. Bye bye /wave. I guess it's normal for people to leave if they can't win against a sound argument.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 06:24 PM
1

No that's your straw man argument. I never stated that or believe that. My view is accountability and responsibility across the board. Single motherhood, absent fathers, young delinquents, abortion are all consequences of the lack of accountability/responsibility in society. Religion has no bearing on this issue.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:19 PM
1

It does. Nobody elected you to speak on their behalf. And more likely than not, if it passes nationwide, those would be exceptions.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:15 PM
1

It would be if abortions were because of rape and incest but 99% are not. .5% for incest and .5% for rape source: guttmacher.org. So, no, they are not the issue here.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:13 PM
1

Stop your straw man arguments, I said two bodies.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:07 PM
1

Well specially if it's inconvenient.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:06 PM
1

During reproduction it's no longer 1 body it's at least 2, more if you have twins etc. You can't be a victim or be forced into pregnancy unless you were raped. Science has advanced since your social class textbook of the 60's. Science opinions now vary on the subject. Bc is relevant as it prevents pregnancy from starting vs ending it. Bc is cheaper than abortion so out goes that argument too.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 07:43 AM
0

Views vary. My view is that life starts at conception. It's the first stage of human growth down to adulthood. From a non view pt, it's largely unnecessary. Money can go to more beneficial means like birth control innovation for men, women.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 07:37 AM
1

.5% are forced. The other 90% are not forced pregnancies. You can't claim being a victim of force against your own natural normal functions. There's no reason to think women are dumb either. It's 2019, to many accessible, cheap bc available. Feminists say black market abortions would occur. I disagree women are smart they will use bc for reasons above. Abortion is more expensive and less accessible than bc.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 07:03 AM
0

Then get sterilized: problem solved. If not be prepared to use 2 birth control solutions (pretty much 100% effective). If not then you wanted to be pregnant/get a girl pregnant. Not accessible you say? Then abortion would be less accessible to you if you can't even buy condoms or get a prescription pill. Too expensive? Then abortion is more expensive so you can't afford that either right? Way too many solutions that are accessible, cheaper and more convenient. It's 2019, pregnancy is 100% preven…
/r/MensRights17/05/19 06:50 AM
1

Hilarious logic. It's called enabling or making it financially easier. Tax payer money flows into the institutions that provide the service. If the institution didn't have the flow they wouldn't be available in the first place. If they did, Abortion cost would go up.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 12:45 AM
1

Hilarious logic. It's called enabling or making it financially easier. Tax payer money flows into the institutions that provide the service. If the institution didn't have the flow they wouldn't be available in the first place. If they did, Abortion cost would go up.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 12:44 AM
1

Are you the minority? Didn't think so. 99% chance you are not.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 12:35 AM
1

Maybe ppl should think about that BEFORE sex?
/r/MensRights17/05/19 12:32 AM
1

Your convenience stops at the point it affects the life of somebody else. I'm sick of people regardless of creed or religion refuse to be responsible for their actions to point of detriment of their own species. Since abortion was legalized single motherhood went up, absent fathers went up. Family units are becoming rare now. But who cares, "men /women want their 10,15 mins of pleasure."
/r/MensRights16/05/19 10:49 PM
1

Or how about both become accountable and responsible for their actions. Currently only men are.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 10:41 PM
1

There's no marriage/divorce/ child support or spousal support or a justice system in nature but human beings have them. Rape is not a natural process, it's a human crime.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 10:40 PM
0

No but the institutions that provide have been funded/supported.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 10:36 PM
1

Biology drives pregnancy. It's the primary consequence/function of sex universally. Love/enjoyment is secondary (only certain species has it at all) to pretend otherwise is nonsense.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 10:32 PM
1

But it's ok to take his money, no problem there right? Either they both have a choice or neither does. Father, legally speaking, should be able to opt out. If a woman wants to continue the pregnancy, it should be her monetary responsibility alone. No more double standards.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 07:32 AM
1

They said the same about slavery, prohibition, gay marriage.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 07:18 AM
1

You can't be a victim of your natural normal biology. Rape/incest is like .5% so don't even try to make argument that it's the norm. 99% of abortions are because of convenience. Birth control is at least 70% effective 90% if you use more than one. Getting sick of these bad arguments bad excuses.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 07:13 AM
1

If you have any recent texts where its normal conversation or love us etc, then that is evidence. Same for people that are friends with you and her. If you told anybody that you were breaking up and they remember the day, that is also good.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 08:13 PM
1

Take screenshots, and make sure you have date and time to compare to your break up texts etc. If you have friends you can trust, have them do the same (document) any interaction they have with the person in question.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 03:22 PM
1

I wholeheartedly disagree. Women don't reproduce by themselves, so unless they can do that, they are separate and not part of the woman's body. I am afraid we will have to agree to disagree.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 03:38 PM
4

Nobody should die because of convenience. Health issues, different story.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 03:08 AM
4

Call me crazy, but i don't believe you can reason with the unreasonable. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights06/03/19 07:58 PM
1

Vitriol should indeed be ignored. Call me crazy, but you can't reason with the unreasonable. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ and r/ GenderCritical screams vitriol.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 07:48 PM
1

I agree.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 07:50 AM
-2

Putting your head down wont do anything. No different than a domestic violence victim just keeping his/her head down while getting verbally abused and "trying to be better than him/her." It's literal vitriol and keeping that "person" open for invite to your house is not exactly smart. You dont put your head down, you get a restraining order against that person, you avoid that person, you ignore that person.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 05:33 AM
-2

Its reddits like that that i believe mensrights should start banning based on where they are subscribed. It's starting to become toxic on their part and should be ignored accordingly. Addressing any threads there is like discussing if a 5 year old has a valid point. Nothing of value will come out of that discussion and there is nothing you can do to convince that bag of cats thread they are out of their mind. Any curious from those type of threads can always create a throwaway account venture in…
/r/MensRights03/03/19 03:02 AM
3

Because girls are different. Because boys and girls generally have different interests as a whole. When it becomes mixed, there is no focus on what boys want to do as a whole. It was the purpose of the boy scouts to help boys develop into proper young men with skills they use in their lives with a focus on what they want do. Now, this will eventually erode and will have to take into account what girls want to do not to mention time and money will now be shared instead of focused.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 08:36 AM
10

I don't think deffending Weinstein is good for mens rights It is relevant to the point. Your first line implies the op is defending that pos. He's not, he's simply pointing out that some are not victims and are really prostituting themselves. Maybe re-read your post.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 06:43 PM
1

So basically Title IX in the legal system? no thanks.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 06:36 PM
11

Weinstein is a creep and most likely did assault some women , but that doesn't automatically make everybody he has had relations with a victim.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 06:27 PM
1

It's clickbait. Wired is no longer relevant that they have to come up with articles written like this.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 05:14 AM
3

Most women whether aware or not take advantage of said traditions, expectations and government programs.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 10:38 PM
1

Do u have a .Gov site/reference?
/r/MensRights11/01/17 06:41 PM
5

We welcome discussion. This is not a feminazi thread where we automatically write people off.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 06:09 PM
3

So your saying barrack Obama didn't earn his presidency? Are you saying Steve Jobs didn't earn his position as CEO? It's been recorded twice that feminists don't want to be drafted, both in the past and the recent. Is it your statement that death in ww2 is not sacrifice? Being a miner, lumberman, oil driller not sacrifice? We have privilege of good decisions, same one as women do. That's why women like Taylor Swift are top money makers in said industry.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 05:58 PM
2

Given the current definition used in statistics of men only able to rape women, I believe you. Does your statement take into account unreported claims of both men and women or just women? We demonize feminists, feminists don't equal women. We demonize female criminals given a slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 05:53 PM
5

What social norms do men have that women don't have? On legal rights, men don't have reproductive rights or body rights (circumsision without consent).
/r/MensRights11/01/17 05:48 PM
3

You state it it like it was given to men as a gift with no sacrifice. As if men didn't give up millions of lives for it ((ww2), give up free time working overtime, give up taking vacations, get critiqued non-stop, to get where they are.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 05:46 PM
4

Answer this question, what legal rights do men have that women don't have?
/r/MensRights11/01/17 05:39 PM
1

It's called laws where fathers can win cases in situations like op. Currently everything is focused on mother with almost no consideration for father.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 03:48 PM
1

I'd recommend that you catch up: http://www.americanadoptions.com/pregnant/birth_father_isnt_supportive All it takes a lying mother.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 05:11 AM
2

The truth is not always nice. Children get both male/female pov/perspective. An average man will never be able to tell what its like to be a woman, feelings, pov. Vice versa an average woman will never be able to tell what it's like to be a man, feelings, pov.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 06:27 PM
2

I am afraid you are mistaken on kylo beating luke. The vision only shows him at the end putting his hand on r2d2. Han mentions he took out the school not by himself but with knights of ren. I'm not aware if the novelization provides more details.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 06:22 PM
17

Idk details of case but if it involved the mother giving up child for adoption without a willing responsible biological father's consent then I agree with fathers4justice.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 01:07 AM
2

I hope that it does if it doesn't I hope men get at least some sort of fraud protection such as mandatory DNA testing for child support requests and/or financial abortion on behalf of father. (Equality reasons, why should men face consequences with little to no way out and women get that in spades?)
/r/MensRights16/11/16 03:56 PM
3

Here's the difference between the two. One, whether guilty or not, can ruin a person's life or mark him/her for life. The other whether guilty or not, does not ruin a person's life or mark him/her for life. Labeling something as a false accusation should hold the same burden of proof as labeling something as a rape. which in most cases, when it comes to sex, is almost impossible to do given the laws in certain states regarding recording video.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:07 AM
1

Guess what. Facts are facts. I can very well say the same in regards to all major news networks: nbc, abc, cbs in regards to being democratic, but I won't cover my ears, like you, and cry. Sorry Facts override your opinion.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:00 AM
0

http://nypost.com/2016/10/12/emails-show-cnn-pundit-fed-hillary-question-before-town-hall/ You have been proven wrong. Go away.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 02:16 PM
8

Safety concerns are everybody's business.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 04:39 AM
0

Women get called sluts, men get called players, same negative perception for the same reason: sleeping around.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 07:34 PM
1

You do realize you're the one slandering Hillary, right? Nice dodge. Calling people names/insulting people based on their opinions of a person sure isn't slanderous right? On the other hand we have hillary Clinton who was factually: Had top secret emails that were not authorized. When questioned or had knowledge that she would be questioned, had all evidence destroyed. Publicly lied about having said emails Had no trouble accepting a rigged(it's been proven via emails) democratic nomination. But…
/r/MensRights29/09/16 09:24 PM
1

Don't have prove anything to you, it will come out soon. It's something she's done before: http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/08/01/emails-reveal-hillary-clinton-fed-meet-the-press-questions-in-advance/#disqus_thread As mentioned previously, believe what you want. You don't get to group that crap in with Snowden and other shit. Psycho. I can group anything I want. When the debate is lost, slander is the tool of the loser. -Socrates
/r/MensRights29/09/16 07:07 PM
1

All issues doubted by people like you calling bullshit / conspiracy theorists when people claimed said issues years before snowden, months before by bernie. Like I said before: believe what you want.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 05:19 PM
2

Nice dude. Up voted as well.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 03:23 PM
2

Looks like it was reactivated cause I found it.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 03:16 PM
1

Oh you mean like people watching you at all times using your phone, laptop, xbox, tv, ? People accessing your data without a warrant/permission? I guess the democratic members screwing over sanders is bullshit too? Got it, snowden is also "conspiracy bullshit" believe what you want then lol.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 01:18 PM
0

Can't say. But if you need to, watch it again and pay attention to her and her paperwork on the podium on each question holt asks.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 08:08 AM
6

Had everything to do with hillary having copy of questions and Trump not. Tell u what though trump crushed her on 2 points: emails and the fact she had been sitting on good plans for at least a decade and doing nothing questioning whether she will act if she's president. Everything else, agreed.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 06:31 PM
1

Marriage has lost its value/purpose. If you can split for any reason then all you have is a relationship with a few legal privileges which you could have gotten anyway through legal documents such as wills, acting decision maker if something happens. Marriage no longer ensures stability something children need.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 07:37 AM
1

Fault divorce was when divorce can only be obtained through valid reasons such as adultery, physical abuse/ life in danger type situation. There were other reasons. No fault divorce means you can divorce for any reason.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 07:32 AM
6

These are the consequences of no fault divorce. Men no longer have any benefit from marrying the mother of their children, on the contrary, they lose. Go back to how it used to be: Give financial and custodial responsibility to the father by default. Currently, the mother has custodial responsibility while the father has the financial responsibility. This just shows its VERY hard for mothers to take care of their children. Go back to fault divorce, remove alimony, because if the mother can't tak…
/r/MensRights17/08/16 12:11 AM
1

Gender is not socialized. It is hard coded. Hormones come into play here as they affect behavior. Men and women vary in concentration of said hormones when it comes to estrogen and testosterone. (You can google it, many studies on this). Men have higher testosterone levels women have higher estrogen levels. It's biological. Are there bad behaviors that need to be controlled, limited, banned? Of course. That's where nurture come into play where it strengthens positive behavior and weakens the neg…
/r/MensRights16/08/16 11:19 PM
1

Your sock is showing.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 07:59 PM
0

If you want to challenge feminists you are in the wrong sub. I like the part where sock puppet posters think we can't track accounts, words and finally IPS and compare.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 07:46 PM
6

Words just words. NOW currently fights equal parental rights. NOW full of feminists. Feminist words don't match feminist actions.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 07:38 PM
2

Keep up the "checks," women, like men, can/will betray anything they tell you if they are scorned and it benefits them.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 06:09 AM
9

response: "Hilarious and Oxymoronic: An entitled woman complaining about men being entitled" or "I'm confused, are you saying women are weak or in the same group as the handicap/disabled that require a seat in general?" or "Why are you grouping women with children and disabled?, I can understand pregnant women, but are you saying being a woman in general is a disability?"
/r/MensRights29/07/16 05:53 AM
1

Except the part where pheromones are involved. Lol picture op failed biology.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 03:10 AM
23

This is shared as a warning for men to watch out for when it comes to custody rights.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 05:28 AM
3

No? Thats right its called common sense. No rape class is an insult against a person's intelligence.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 10:01 PM
3

High amount of abortion, babies being left in dumpsters pretty much counter that viewpoint.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 09:58 PM
6

Women can work in mines and other workplaces that they are not allowed to work at. News to me. Can you point us to the restriction or reference to it?
/r/MensRights20/03/16 05:45 AM
10

I love how the perspective changes. If a woman is pregnant, its not about the child inside, its about her bodily autonomy, but when a man doesn't want a child, its not about his financial autonomy its about the child.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 07:41 AM
1

And at that, not from the son, but from the mother.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 09:22 AM
1

It's a trap! - Admiral Ackbar
/r/MensRights05/03/16 09:21 AM
0

Most trolls make a side account to troll so their main accounts dont get banned. Not saying you are necessarily which is why i said "not sure"
/r/MensRights01/03/16 08:07 AM
1

Sorry to say, just like any victim to any other crime.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 06:47 AM
0

Not sure if genuine. 1 month old account.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 06:45 AM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 07:38 PM
1

Definitely not impossible.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 07:37 PM
1

You mentioned a healthy 49 year old with a specific height would weigh less than a 15 year old. That is the reason i mentioned if your position is that the us in general are healthy. My argument is that in general a woman at 49 is not likely to be physically over powered by a 15 year old.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 06:46 PM
1

Also we dont know height yet
/r/MensRights25/02/16 05:29 PM
1

I could be mistaken but i believe this in the us right? Is your position that most people in the us are healthy?
/r/MensRights25/02/16 05:25 PM
1

Im not arguing they dont exist. Im arguing that in general they are taller than that. Thats why i mentioned odds and not certainty.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 05:10 PM
0

Was not sure if he was a troll or not. I did disengage. I will refrain from reporting so easily
/r/MensRights25/02/16 04:39 PM
0

You got me there! I'm sure that proves your point! Good job! When losing an argument, always change subject. I will no longer engage with the illogical that resort to slander such as you. I think you're in the wrong sub, Illogical/Slander is that way: /r/feminism
/r/MensRights25/02/16 09:05 AM
0

"When the debate is lost, slander is the tool of the loser." - Socrates.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 09:00 AM
2

I'm banking on threats from the 15 year old reporting it to the police.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 07:36 AM
-1

Its called math and looking at odds. We don't have heights, we don't have weights, but go ahead and keep arguing that she was physically overpowered and not blackmailed with threats of reporting the rape or manipulated into (2nd likelyhood) from the 15 year old, yes take that to bank. /VERY reasonable Your account is 4 months old, but you call me the troll, right.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 07:33 AM
1

And that's ok. Like I said there is no height in the article, so its possible, but compared to the majority/general, odds are not in your favor.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 07:14 AM
-1

Except for the fact this is not a court room nor is the website a legal blog, it is a news story. Typically, when you hear about women being physically forced to do something, it is mentioned in the story. Instead we get the word "coerced." You know why she was "coerced?" because nobody would believe a 15 year old "forced" a 49 year old to do anything. You would know that, if you read more news/newspapers. I could be mistaken but i don't believe the 49 year old is a lawyer or even a paralegal ei…
/r/MensRights25/02/16 06:14 AM
1

Odds slightly back in your favor, definitely a variable we don't know yet.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 06:12 AM
0

The word in that case would have been "forced" not coerced. Coerced implies a manipulation. But you would have to be mentally disabled (which apparently she wasn't physically nor mentally disabled) to be manipulated into sex in regards to a 15 year old vs a 49 year old.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 03:59 AM
1

and compare that to the majority of 13/15 year olds, like i said, its possible but the odds are not in your favor.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 03:58 AM
1

Did you just call yourself the equivalent of a 49 year old? I'm not trying to make fun of you, but i think you just burned yourself. 49 year old =/ 30 year old. I said it was possible, but the likehood: the odds are not in your favor.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 03:58 AM
1

49 year old at 130lb? Possible, but not likely. The odds are not in your favor.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 02:43 AM
-2

coercion in other words means: convinced. A 15 year old can't coerce a 49 year old woman, unless the woman in question is mentally ill or has some type of mental disability.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 02:41 AM
3

Let's do a gender swap to test the logic and legitimacy: 15 year old girl is charged with raping a 47 year old man. She reportedly "coerced" him. Yea, not buying it. Sounds like the old lady saw that the boy would report her for rape, and got to the police first and made this up. This is my assumption, I could very well be mistaken.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 02:38 AM
3

No level of verbal harrassment warrants a physical response. Based on the video she is the aggressor physically.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 09:20 PM
20

Looking for someone and initiating physical violence is not self defense.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 05:18 AM
7

Not a valid excuse. I suppose, he should beat the shit out of her if she was harassing him right?
/r/MensRights21/02/16 02:25 AM
5

Sorry have to correct this. Based on article she engaged in front of child not with child.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:19 AM
1

What i meant to say, is that, for the most part, 25 and up is when the male starts to mature can take things more seriously. Obviously, the older you are, the more mature you get.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 06:38 PM
4

When the time comes, I'd like to practice Biiblicl Courtship. As far as what I'd be looking for in a girl, I'd want a wife who is Godly, sweet, caring, and a good cook. I'd only marry a girl who agreed to be a homemaker Let me stop you right here. You are most likely 16/17. I know you must hear this a lot, but you are too young to get married. It's not just finding the woman you like/want, its also being emotionally, logically, reasonably mature to be able to be part of that kind of a relationsh…
/r/MensRights13/02/16 03:17 AM
1

There is nothing you can do. The only thing you can hope for is forgiveness and thats it. If he doesnt forgive you, then thats it. Frankly, its justified. My advice would be to ask him to just listen with no required response or forgiveness just so he at least knows that you are deeply remorseful.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:48 PM
1

You will be banned shortly.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:57 PM
2

The troll is strong with this one.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:50 PM
2

And waste his time, on a chance that he may get the tickets. He shouldn't spend any more of his time/energy on a child.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 07:15 AM
9

It's quite simple: You can either be mad about it, and let her win (afterall thats what she wants to feel victorious) or you can move on, consider it a lesson learned and say to yourself, what goes around comes around. When some women are wronged, they act like children and fight for any thread of victory to "feel" good. So let the child have her gifts and show her up by living a better life without her. Best thing you can do now is block her and ignore the child completely. You should be above …
/r/MensRights23/01/16 06:55 AM
3

Real cop in action.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 07:40 PM
79

Glimmer of hope
/r/MensRights20/01/16 10:55 PM
1

The odds are not in your favor if you are married. 50% of marriages fail within the first 2 years. Of that 50%, 80 to 90% is brought forward by Women. Prenups can be thrown out in court all she has to do is have her lawyer argue distress while signing said prenup. I honestly wished marriage was about love, and going through the good and bad throughout life, but as mentioned previously, 50% bail when the bad comes in.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 04:13 AM
1

There has been a total of at least 3 or 4 posts on this already in the last day, do you guys even check before posting?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 07:14 PM
2

Best course of action is education on both ends of the spectrum. Teach responsibility for both man and woman, make options known to both of them in regards to pregnancy prevention, teach safeguards and precautions to both women and men.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 02:39 AM
2

Seems to me you failed the shit tests 3 times. Its funny cause its the same shit test, you would think you would have countered it by the second, but a 3rd? "Fool me once, shame on you, Fool me twice shame on me." She's trolling you. If she contacts you again respond with her with silence. She doesn't deserve your attention for bull shitting you 3 times.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 11:07 PM
1

Very well done post OP. Things in life that have any weight in value are not easy, they are hard and take time. Things with no value/negative things are almost always easy. Good = hard, Bad = easy Embrace, Endure the suck ---> Enjoy the Benefits.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 10:38 PM
1

I would do what that poster did, then as she got out, spat in both of their faces. Nothing can muster how crappy you feel when somebody spits in your face. It lowers you to less than trash.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 12:33 AM
1

Nothing substantially good in life is easy or is instant, it all takes time and is hard. Good Education, Good job, Money, etc. All takes time and dedication. Working out is no different That's what I think about when I go to the gym.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/15 11:02 PM
1

Regarding your ex's family. Next time she sends you a text inviting you to a social event, save the text and take it to her friends and family and show them hey, what can I do for her not to contact me again? What will help you is the date of the text. She can talk shit all she wants, but even a female will understand the logic that if you are shit, why are you getting invites? Now this won't win them over, but it will create something very helpful: doubt. This doubt will then open their eyes an…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 12:42 AM
1

If I can sum up Feminism it would be this: Spoiled brats.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 11:05 PM
1

1st Mistake: You debated her via a textual format (text, email, facebook etc) [gives time for the hamster to roll, you want to overwhelm the hamster so she defers to your judgement. If you talk one on one, the hamster has severely less time to roll] 2nd Mistake: By you responding with reasons, you are trying to convince her of it, [shes in power] instead of her trying to convince you [you're in power] On the feminist claim: "violence against women is never ok" Your response should be: "Violence …
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 09:39 PM
1

Maybe, but he was a kid apparently (could be mistaken). The bible calls it out and mentions they were jealous of him. Not sure how you can call a child a spoiled asshole and not expect it in the first place?
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 12:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter