TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

neveragoodtime Archive

View 11 posts and 1,625 comments by neveragoodtime on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
577

Social Issuesneveragoodtime/r/MensRights06/05/22 03:03 PM
542

Rant/Ventingneveragoodtime/r/TheRedPill09/04/15 05:57 PM
303

Discriminationneveragoodtime/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:52 PM
157

neveragoodtime/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:29 PM
86

Generalneveragoodtime/r/MensRights06/10/23 04:34 PM
40

Anti-MRMneveragoodtime/r/MensRights20/06/19 07:00 PM
12

neveragoodtime/r/MensRights22/08/16 01:54 PM
1

Feminismneveragoodtime/r/MensRights28/05/21 02:48 PM
0

Rant/Ventingneveragoodtime/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 05:19 AM
0

Social Issuesneveragoodtime/r/MensRights15/07/19 12:32 PM
0

Ask Red Pillneveragoodtime/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 04:55 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,625 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Men are hated and ridiculed, women most affected.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 02:23 PM
3

White men enabled feminism which told women it was fine to go for a walk in your sports bra. Feminism has every reason to be mad at white men for making a world so safe for them that they no longer can do simple risk analysis anymore.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 04:23 PM
4

You missed the irony, so I will spell it out. Democrats don’t want you to have an opinion on abortion because you have a penis. That is how you are being excluded by the party that you are defending. I don’t think your terrible opinions have anything to do with your genitalia, that’s the difference.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 04:11 AM
9

And your argument that Dems don’t explicitly exclude men is their fight to allow women to have abortions where they explicitly exclude male opinions? How much more clear could they be that men are not allowed a say in their pro abortion platform? Maybe you could think of a Republican platform they tell women, no testicles no opinion?
/r/MensRights08/06/26 08:17 PM
0

You’re not a woman or a Republican, why should anyone care about your wrong opinions on either?
/r/MensRights08/06/26 08:10 PM
42

Failed to address men? Or explicitly excluded them from their platform. I’m not sure what you mean by taking a hard stance on those issues. The Republicans aren’t fighting against women, they’re fighting against the victim mindset that gives feminism so many invented problems to fight for.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 11:24 AM
8

OK, so why not just give men the extra days and let them take it on their own, they’re adults not children and don’t need micromanaging.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 12:33 AM
8

Do all women menstruate? Do you really want your employer verifying or tracking your menstrual cycles? Why only 1 day when menstruation can last 3-5 days? Can I claim to be a woman and receive it, or is it trans exclusionary? This puts women at a disadvantage when it comes to workplace performance by missing more meetings and likely promotion opportunities, increasing a wage gap Dems claim to be against.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 01:56 PM
128

Why not just give men the same days of PTO and let them use them when they want, just like women? Same result you’re advocating for plus it’s fair and equal. Democrats are against treating men fairly or they would be arguing for what you suggest and not only advocating for the benefits of women.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 11:39 AM
125

I bet it’s the gender who wouldn’t be required to participate.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 10:45 PM
25

We’ve screwed things up pretty bad, but trust us, we can screw it up a little bit more. One generation of single moms and no one will want to have kids, no matter how subsidized they are.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 03:01 AM
2

Hopefully my son learns to respect women like he respects alligators, or great white sharks.
/r/MensRights07/03/26 07:06 PM
2

First of all, there’s no reason to get married if this is how you feel. Until the divorce system is massively changed, the breadwinner will continue to be screwed regardless of prenup, which only covers assets before the marriage. Secondly, $100k is not very much money to be worried about protecting with a prenup. The majority of your wealth will be built during your marriage and will all be subject to community property rules, depending on state.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 10:00 PM
175

If the application lowers requirements on women, doesn’t that mean requirements for men are higher and therefore discriminates against them based on their gender? Why is equality so hard for people pretending to fight for equality?
/r/MensRights14/02/26 10:46 PM
20

Then you’re not a feminist, you’re a supremacist.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 08:58 PM
75

Free from the oppressive power structures of the patriarchy and she wants to be a hairdresser. A woman tried to pass as a servant boy and was discovered after a month, I wonder what happens every month that gave her away.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 03:24 AM
8

How do you define a high value man? Are you going to find a man your age who wants to have frozen egg babies in 5-10 years instead of dating a younger more fertile woman? Probably not. Would you find a successful 40-45 divorced father willing to have another kid high value? Are you going to find a man with more impressive degrees than you? Probably not. Would you consider an ambitious art history major high value? Are you going to find a man who makes more money than you? Probably not. Would you…
/r/RedPillWomen06/06/25 11:31 AM
7

I wish women would use AI to make better decisions. Sadly, if you’ve seen what social media has done to women, AI will crank it to 11. Women are about to be destroyed by AI. They will no longer be able to look in a mirror because all their selfies are instantly beautified. They will no longer be able to self reflect because their AI companion will be their emotional tampon telling them exactly what they want to hear. They will be bombarded by FOMO of deep fakes of their friends have great fictio…
/r/MensRights05/06/25 09:50 PM
3

I didn’t ask for your help, friend. My body my choice doesn’t really exempt the person who gets drunk ( my body my choice ), drives home ( my body my choice ), and kills someone’s in an accident ( my body my choice ). Actions have consequences and they’re not always fair. My body my choice is just something women say to avoid taking responsibility for the consequences of their actions. I’m picking on women here because men are not legally allowed to have an abortion, otherwise I’m sure just as m…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 03:25 PM
5

I think you are morally justified in your position. There are programs in place for adoption and foster care to help children without parental support. Sure, it is a difficult situation, but also there are great people who come out of it as well. There are probably some kids that come out better from an adoption family than biological parents. These are unpredictable factors that can’t be factored in to the logic of the decision making process.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 03:04 PM
5

If you find yourself in that situation then you have made some mistakes along the way to end up in that position and should remove yourself from that man’s company. There are plenty of men who also don’t want to have a baby yet and have had sex education and know where babies come from.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 01:51 PM
5

Looking at things logically and scientifically is a very different approach than looking at things morally. Logically and scientifically we can draw reasonable lines in gray areas, like 12 weeks, 18, 24, you can find a defensible reason for a fair outcome. A moral argument is an argument about what is right and wrong, and it doesn’t matter what is fair or just. Some people will make a moral argument despite the consequences seeming unfair, some people will make an argument of fairness despite th…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 01:48 PM
7

Since your question is about morality, birth control options are all morally more acceptable than abortion. Abstinence is the only perfectly moral birth control, but most people don’t want to hear that. What is so special about P in V sex for people who don’t want to be pregnant? Oral, Anal, Handsies, boobs, toys all have 0% conception rates. But women want to have a choice about what they put in their body, and then they need a choice about what they take out.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 01:30 PM
6

Bodily autonomy has never been a thing. We put people in jail, we don’t let people do drugs, no trespassing, only doctors can perform medical procedures, etc etc. There are multiple laws preventing you from hurting yourself and others. My body my choice is a pithy catch phrase that pretends like there aren’t hundreds of exceptions to it.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 01:21 PM
6

Your metaphor takes away the woman’s agency. She did not wake up tomorrow hooked up to a stranger. She engaged in consensual sex, because it feels good. So she hooked herself up to this life form. When your own actions create the life, then you assume the responsibility for that life. This goes for the dad as well and is legally enforced by child support.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 12:45 PM
6

You’re acting like we don’t make a legal distinction between actively murdering someone (abortion), and someone dying of natural causes (miscarriage).
/r/MensRights23/05/25 12:38 PM
2

Interesting, I haven’t expressed anything different from your perspective other than emphasizing that submission is an action on the woman’s part and not a reaction to the man’s behavior. A dominant man doesn’t force a woman to submit, she chooses to submit to submit to submit to him.
/r/RedPillWomen28/04/25 08:19 PM
3

You are right, I should have said she can submit to any man that she finds respectable and worthy of her gift. However, once she finds a man like that, she must be able to submit on her own actions, not transactionally based on how she feels about his actions at the moment. Otherwise, she can’t really claim to be a submissive woman, she can be manipulated into being submissive by his behavior.
/r/RedPillWomen28/04/25 12:57 PM
2

That’s a good way of putting it, she has a high dominance threshold. Would you say a “high value man” can only be dominant over the right woman, a woman worthy of his dominance, or over any woman?
/r/RedPillWomen28/04/25 01:41 AM
15

You get to choose who you desire to submit to for sex or a relationship. But if you make it his responsibility to earn your submission, then you’re not taking responsibility for your own agency. If you mouth off to him, that’s his fault for not keeping you in line. If you disagree with him, it’s his fault for not being a good leader. That’s not submission, that’s acting like a child.
/r/RedPillWomen27/04/25 05:53 PM
19

That’s the point I wanted to make, submission is not earned, it’s given as a gift to your man. Making your submission contingent on his behavior is transactional. They won’t think you’re special, they’ll think that they are special because they earned your submission and therefore deserve it. Think of it this way, a high value man can make any woman submit to him, a high value woman can submit to any man. That doesn’t mean you should submit to any man, find one that meets your standards and expe…
/r/RedPillWomen27/04/25 05:10 PM
39

You’ve already identified your issue, the next step is self care and therapy to overcome it. You are not attracted to men who show you too much long term attraction. You are attracted to men who come on strong and show you short term attraction. You have defined red pill masculinity as men who treat you a certain way that is not healthy for long term commitment, which is your ultimate goal. There are in fact, strong confident men who show their partner their due affection and appreciation. If yo…
/r/RedPillWomen27/04/25 04:28 PM
4

This is true, and I would add, that while Democrats are trying to carve out additional bonus rights for women, Republicans are willing to treat both men and women equally shitty.
/r/MensRights20/04/25 09:23 PM
1

You only think it’s that restrictive because that’s how opponents and the media are reporting it. In reality, it will not be much different than what Europe is doing.
/r/MensRights18/04/25 03:13 PM
1

Yes, it would be a little different than this because that list allows you to prove right to work, not citizenship right to vote, but there is some overlap. My point is that there are multiple ways to verify your citizenship status, so there is no need to worry about married women who change their names or men who can’t get passports. As you say, European countries have figured this out without denying citizens from voting, America shouldn’t find this controversial.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 07:28 PM
1

Yes, look up the I-9 form that every legal American worker uses to prove citizenship status. I’ve never had a voter registration expire. I’ve re-registered when moving. But once you have the documentation to prove voting status once, the argument is moot. Because you don’t need to be a licensed driver in order to vote, you need to be a US citizen. Non citizens can get driver’s licenses in order to drive to work. It would be like accepting my student id in order to vote, there is no correlation t…
/r/MensRights15/04/25 10:35 PM
-6

Not a men’s rights issue. If you want to invent new ways women are “oppressed” find another forum.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 04:10 PM
31

There is a lot of misinformation about this bill, and pretty much everything you said is untrue. Every American has to prove their citizenship status with documentation every time they start a new job. Nobody worries that married women won’t be able to get a job because of documentation requirements. This would create the same requirement when you register to vote, once. You don’t have to bring your birth certificate or any ID to the poll every time you vote. Only once when you register to vote.…
/r/MensRights13/04/25 03:12 PM
9

Exactly, this just makes it easier for women to kick fathers out of their kids’ lives and get more money for it. This will only create more fatherlessness, because the problem was never men leaving their children. The overwhelming majority has always been women taking their children. And solution has always been to punish the men and reward the women doing this, because women couldn’t possibly do something bad for personal and financial gain. It must be the men who want to get punished with chil…
/r/MensRights31/01/25 01:54 PM
27

And blood type if they expect to keep it a secret past 6th grade biology.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 04:25 PM
54

I guess my body my choice is out the window?
/r/MensRights05/01/25 07:44 PM
25

If women knew the child would be tested, wouldn’t they be less likely to have marital affairs?
/r/MensRights25/12/24 03:23 PM
8

Women have their own sports leagues because they can’t compete with men, women have their own investment funds… because they can’t compete with men. They are proving the point they are arguing against.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 07:26 PM
12

When they finally reach peak dominance they will realize that they’ve won nothing but a shitty job with long hours. I look forward to my grandsons complaining about the matriarchy keeping them down and how their hard working wives expect food and sex when they get home from their hard job and long commute.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 06:24 AM
0

Offer to do it for him for free using AI?
/r/RedPillWomen16/11/24 05:26 PM
3

Your cheapest option is to hire a lawyer.
/r/MensRights16/11/24 01:46 AM
1

They’re too dumb to realize that they’ve found their own solution to their problems. Something they’ve been telling men the whole time, don’t have sex if you don’t want a baby.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 03:05 PM
3

Mgtow, women don’t treat us well so we’ll ignore them. 4B, we’re angry at the world so we’ll take it out on men until they do what we want. It’s pure manipulation and it won’t end well for them.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 12:44 PM
1

But the government does have a role in protecting life, that’s why we have laws against murder and we don’t just leave it up to the professionals to work it out. I can’t ask a doctor to chop off my arm with the explanation that it’s my body my choice. If a doctor did that he would probably lose his license, even though it’s between a man and his medical professionals, right?
/r/MensRights06/11/24 04:46 PM
2

I guess women do need men after all.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 02:50 PM
14

Women have two ways of arguing these points. Basically everything in our world was created by men. So the things they like were done by men, that were secretly led by women who actually did all the groundwork for them to take credit. And the things they don’t like were done by men. They have to remove all agency from women in order to blame all things on men. So, who created the patriarchy? It was the women, wives, and mothers who stood to benefit from the men fighting, protecting, and providing…
/r/MensRights31/10/24 07:02 PM
2

They still can’t admit that women have agency. It’s all men taking action to leave. They can’t accept that once women reach a 60% majority, THEY ACTIVELY DRIVE MEN OUT. No, it must be the 40% men who hate being around women. Not the 60% women who hate being around men.
/r/MensRights19/10/24 04:26 PM
3

Women don’t have this problem, the problem they describe is too many men coming up to them and trying to be friendly without being attractive enough.
/r/MensRights19/10/24 04:11 PM
13

They don’t think men are invincible, they think they’re expendable.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 08:20 PM
17

It speaks to his willingness to put tax payer funds to waste for the benefit of the 0.01% in the name of political points. For every underage trans boy in public schools, there are hundreds of boys who will just take the tampons for a joke. Meanwhile, if you are a period having trans boy, you really need to take responsibility for your biological functions, and not depend on the governor of your state to provide you with free sanitary products.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 05:11 AM
17

Your pain and suffering was the feature, not a bug.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 10:56 PM
2

Women are being sexually abused and their solution is, send more women?
/r/MensRights29/09/24 03:47 PM
31

There’s only one gender that is being excluded from museums though. So opening a museum for only men would literally be promoting equal opportunity. It would be different if women were opening this because they were currently being excluded from some men’s only museum. That’s just not reality.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 05:12 PM
36

It’s time we revealed the CO2 and environmental waste generation of the makeup industry and how women’s vanity and obsession with their looks is destroying the planet. Women need to address their toxic femininity before climate change kills us all. Or we could just let a guy eat a hamburger in peace ffs. That hamburger isn’t going to create climate change, and it helps keep him alive, which is more than can be said about makeup. What’s with the obsession with changing every aspect of male behavi…
/r/MensRights15/09/24 07:42 PM
34

No one should have to deny who they are to receive the benefits of who they’re not.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 04:21 AM
10

Men who are abused may eventually fight back, which only adds to their findings that men are abusive.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 01:55 PM
5

Sounds like he’s 23 and self-supporting, the court order is pretty clear. It just sucks his mom latched onto him after his dad’s money dried up.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 05:34 AM
5

“Why don’t men think I’m pretty enough to be raped?” -Vermont women probably
/r/MensRights20/06/24 02:12 PM
4

Everytime a woman’s issue is talked about it changes to “what about men?” No, everytime a woman’s issue is talked about it starts as “What about men?” What about men who sit next to women? What about men who walk near women? What about men who try to talk to women?
/r/MensRights17/06/24 04:07 PM
9

That and end the monetization of children through child support and the issue is solved. Poor people have children who love their parents, there is no amount of money a parent has to have in order to be a good parent, and we need to stop pretending there is.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 03:03 AM
26

Complain that your husband can’t fix it, probably.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 03:26 AM
89

How is he supposed to do the dishes if she always does the dishes? I’ll never understand the feminist condition of, “I’m going to choose to do something and also complain about choosing to do something.”
/r/MensRights04/06/24 11:28 PM
5

When you stereotype a group of people, you’re not supposed to attack and blame the people calling out your bigotry. It’s uncouth.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 03:14 AM
3

Instead of complaining about how being home and taking care of their kids set their career back, maybe they should complain that having a career set their family back. No one ever complains on their deathbed that they wish they had more time for their career.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 02:36 PM
59

I was going to say more men need to become those Chads, but I realized it’s all relative to women. There will always be a top 20% to them, no matter how great the bottom 80% is. Men of the west today are the kindest, most respectful, and most successful men in the history of the world and women can’t stop complaining about the “ick.” How would a woman like that live before dentistry, deodorant, air conditioning, indoor plumbing…?
/r/MensRights23/05/24 03:39 PM
4

Poor women can’t stop sexually harassing other women by providing them with this unsolicited dick seat. Won’t be long before a woman is traumatized and offended by the site of sexualized male nudity and it’s removed. Women just can’t stop scoring points against themselves. How about I just show everyone my dick in order to bring awareness to the sexual harassment women experience everyday? That’s how much sense this makes. There’s such high demand and little supply that they have to manufacture …
/r/MensRights23/05/24 01:43 PM
40

It’s a strange world that when a mother gets the luxury of staying at home and caring for her children while being supported by a man or a government, gets referred to as the “motherhood penalty.”
/r/MensRights23/05/24 05:05 AM
1

I, for one, would love to see a diversity hire in the NBA. That would be hilarious and sad at the same time.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 12:27 AM
2

You got bad advice, mate. Don’t judge someone’s character by if they pay for your dinner. There are many other non transactional methods. Does he say nice thing or mean things, does he make you feel good or bad, does he listen or lecture, does he do things for you or not? There are many ways to show love in a relationship, buying gifts is the lowest effort.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 11:47 PM
29

That it’s a hate campaign. They’re more interested in blaming men than helping women.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 11:40 PM
3

If they want to be in healthy reciprocal relationships, then why are they taking advice from women to put themselves in debt to men, to whore themselves out for a meal, and to be dependent on men’s provisions? This is not the patriarchy, this is women’s advice to other women. Also, what’s to prevent a man from using her after he buys her a meal? That makes no sense.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 11:27 PM
4

Are men allowed to buy a woman who sells herself? Or are they arrested for allowing a woman to sell herself?
/r/MensRights18/05/24 02:14 PM
66

I’ll stop playing my tiny violin for these women once they stop expressing their personal views that men should pay on the first date and provide for women because they deserve it. They have an opinion about how women should behave, he has an opinion about how women should behave. Everything is equal, as it should be. We are starting to see men willing to take back the power they’ve always had because they no longer have anything to lose. Men of a previous generation believed in a strategy of ap…
/r/MensRights18/05/24 01:23 AM
6

Isn’t Gen alpha like 5 or 6 years old right now?
/r/MensRights18/05/24 01:06 AM
82

Despite giving birth for 100,000 years without pain medicine, despite being offered epidural pain medication for the procedure, many women still choose to go through the natural child birth process. This must be men’s fault.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 10:50 PM
15

It makes a lot of sense why men don’t do it as much. Men are often forced to work with a diverse variety of other men with other views to accomplish their mission, at work, in the military, in team sports. Prioritizing divisive virtue signaling sets people apart instead of bringing them together for cooperation.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 12:44 PM
6

Everyone wants the man to pay for the kids but no one wants to give him custody so he can pay for the kids. Remember child support was never about how much support a child needs. If it were, there would be no need for child support in millionaire Hollywood divorces, both parents can afford the child’s needs just fine. This is about “equity” of outcomes, to balance out lifestyles between households. So if dad works hard and makes more money, that’s not fair to the mom who doesn’t work hard to mak…
/r/MensRights14/05/24 02:09 AM
10

“Critics tore apart the study involving almost 800,000 medical insurance claims in the US, arguing it was heavily flawed and proved nothing.” Unfortunately, this still passes for scientific inquiry in some circles. And of course, instead of arguing from their conclusion that we need to provide male doctors with better educational opportunities, or teach women how to communicate better with male doctors, the conclusion is to just get rid of male doctors and only have female doctors. That’s how yo…
/r/MensRights23/04/24 04:28 PM
2

Thanks for the response. I guess I agree, but it’s like the writers just through spaghetti against the wall to see what would stick with audiences, rather than crafting a specifically nuanced take that forces everyone to rethink their positions.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 01:25 AM
21

If Ken symbolizes women, what time in our reality does the Kendom represent, when women brainwashed men to accept their rule for evil purposes? If Barbie symbolizes men, then what time in our reality is represented when men prevented women from living with them? The entire metaphor of the movie is broken within the first act, and goes downhill from there. It was a feminist wet dream which invented a “real world” where patriarchy exists, so that they could strawman how great it would be if women …
/r/MensRights01/04/24 06:21 PM
29

Women have always had the option of working outside the house. It was quite normal for both parents to work while a live in grandparent took care of kids. It wasn’t until a brief moment in the 50’s when a middle class was able to have a stay at home parent. And it was considered a luxury, until a generation later when women have decided it was literal slavery. It wasn’t until air conditioned office jobs that were easier than raising kids came along when women started demanding to be included, as…
/r/MensRights31/03/24 01:24 PM
28

Schrodinger’s Agency, a woman lives in a state of having and not having agency. Only after having measured the morality of her choices can we determine if she did or did not have agency.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 02:22 PM
12

It’s like the more money that goes to solving their problems, the bigger the problems become, needing more and more funding every year.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 08:01 PM
6

Are feminists unable to do the math? You can’t have 50% female engineers if you have 90% female nurses. There aren’t enough women in the workforce to achieve “equality” with men, when there are more men in the workforce to start, and when women prefer to work in other fields more. Feminism is asking for something that is mathematically impossible, and something women choose not to do. Women could solve this tomorrow by choosing to be engineers, but they don’t want to.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 07:46 PM
2

True, but women can’t tell the difference. No one can tell if a person’s actions are voluntary or involuntary except for that person. That’s one of the many reasons the term is so stupid. It assumes the man wants to have sex in the first place because men so horny.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 08:20 PM
-9

Women hate incels because they are men on a sex strike. Their power means nothing to these men.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 01:40 PM
2

You shouldn’t take school policy to protect you and him so personally. Are you getting a worse education because the door is open? Discrimination requires an unequal treatment. Have you caught him alone in a room with a boy with the door closed? Do you feel there is unfair treatment between being taught with the door open or closed? Do you want to be in the room alone with him and the door closed, and have you expressed this to him? Have you considered that you make him uncomfortable, and he has…
/r/MensRights08/03/24 05:03 PM
1

It’s only a joke if you believe women deserve advantages for hundreds of years of oppression is also a joke.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 03:28 AM
1

But that’s your date’s job!
/r/MensRights06/03/24 03:59 AM
77

Women need to pay for dates due to years of men being financially oppressed and forced to pay.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 03:58 AM
2

I wish that could at least be considered in court. You want to leave this marriage? Yes. And you want to be paid for that? Yes. But with no fault divorce, everyone is left to just assume he must have done something for his wife to cheat on him, divorce him, and then ask him for money. Some of these men are victims of domestic violence, perpetrated by the woman they are forced to pay. There are no exceptions made for fault or DV.
/r/MensRights02/03/24 09:48 PM
2

I hear you, and I agree. I think child support and alimony are holding women back and encouraging them to pretend to be unable to help themselves so they can receive more money. Take that away and watch the “wage gap” disappear for women as they put that effort into earning more money rather than pleading for more money.
/r/MensRights02/03/24 09:23 PM
3

As soon as you do this, women will quite suddenly become financially stable, and insist they do not need child support or alimony. This is because they pretend to be helpless to get money from their ex.
/r/MensRights01/03/24 02:49 PM
10

This is key. If you can’t afford your kid without support and the other parent, the “deadbeat” parent can, you shouldn’t have custody. I would gladly pay twice as much child support to day care and have full custody of my kids. But that’s not how the courts work, they award the mom custody, and then award her child support for the “burden” of her first award. Here’s the new car you wanted, oh and here’s money for gas from some guy you had sex with! We wouldn’t want all that responsibility to fal…
/r/MensRights29/02/24 11:04 PM
8

Ask if they think victims of domestic violence should have to pay alimony to their abuser.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 02:03 AM
1

And if I tell everyone on the internet that I personally know you are a pedophile and a rapist who is HIV positive, how do you plan to prove that you are not? I don’t know what form of justice exists without innocence until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 04:56 PM
48

That’s one way for strong independent mothers to teach their sons the true value of women.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 03:32 PM
31

Wow, it really is always a woman destroying the choices and livelihood of other strong independent empowered women prostitutes.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 03:30 PM
3

So, in your mind, an anonymous person on the internet can post an accusation about a picture of a person with no proof, and there is no proof that he can provide that can counter that accusation.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 04:29 AM
2

There was a wild story in LA about an Airbnb renter who wouldn’t move out. She also happened to be a woman and the landlord a man. She got away with it for over a year. I don’t know if gender has anything to do with it, but I assume a woman could have claimed his presence intimidates her and get a TRO in a week. Property owning men are kicked out of their own home by women all this time with this one little trick.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 04:39 PM
6

No custody no support! If you aren’t going to allow the father in the child’s life then he can’t be expected to pay for that life.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 03:18 PM
2

Why won’t fashion designers make men’s pant pockets big enough for my bricks? Sexism.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 05:07 AM
4

We still need you in society. I understand the desire and need to take a break, but keep yourself open to chances to re-engage, with your church, gym, friends, whoever. You’ll find a path in time. There are men out there who don’t care what you look like, how much money you make, or what degrees you have. Find them and help them build bridges to other men who are quietly disappearing. No man is an island and we need help building boats.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 04:15 PM
60

When people say “Men run the world,” they don’t mean men lead the world, they mean men literally keep the world running.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 04:34 PM
2

Yes, really. You didn’t know that before you posted your comment? The court factors income and custodial time only. If the primary caretaker makes more than the other parent, he could still end up paying her money. He could have the kids 5 nights a week and still pay her child support for her 2 days if he makes 10x more money than her.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 05:28 PM
1

Yes, and “primary caretaker” is not one of those factors. Parental income and custodial time. One could be designated the primary custodian, but no additional child support comes with the title, potentially more custodial time which leads to more child support, but not for the title itself.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 05:23 PM
0

You might as well say having a job is a burden, it still requires effort. Yet so many people choose to do it because the benefits are greater than the costs, ie not a burden.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 04:38 AM
3

The court doesn’t factor that into their calculations.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 04:35 AM
0

Child support is meant to penalize the high income parent, usually the father. Here’s how CS works in my state: Assume equal custody. Dad makes 2x mom. State calculations determine the child cost to be $1,500 based on joint income. Dad is responsible for 2x mom based on income. Dad; $1,000, Mom; $500 Dad pays $150 health insurance. Dad; $850. We can’t verify dad pays this, but we can’t verify mom pays the $500 either. Dad; $850 - $500 = $350 How do we make sure Dad spends the extra $350 on his k…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 03:59 AM
6

Parents with 50/50 joint custody still pay child support.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 03:30 AM
0

RAISING A CHILD IS NOT A BURDEN. If you think raising a child is a burden or a cost then don’t become a parent and don’t take custody in divorce. It’s really that simple. We get more from our children than their expenses. This belief that children are a burden is what allowed single mothers to demand financial benefits from non custodial fathers while reaping the emotional benefits of raising the children. The father loses everything, time with his kids and money to their mother.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 03:29 AM
-1

Take away daycare and that’s $300 - $500 per month. It’s your choice not to stay home and take care of your kid for free. And even if you don’t, daycare is for 3-4 years, child support is 19 years. What are you doing with that $2,300/ month the other 15 years?
/r/MensRights12/01/24 03:21 AM
41

Weaponized incompetence is when she doesn’t know how to flip the breaker, not when his cleaning doesn’t meet her standards and she calls him incompetent.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 01:15 AM
30

That’s fine as long as she understands that if she saves it during the marriage it gets split during the divorce.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 01:14 AM
3

They’re still under the impression they can put the cat back in the bag. That by equalizing the field between men and women is an admission that things will never go back to the way things are, because you can’t allow paper abortion and not allow fetal abortion. They are stuck with an old way of thinking. To make things equal, we need to either give men the same rights or remove those rights from women. As much as I agree with them, that no one should be able to give up a child, the ship has sai…
/r/MensRights10/01/24 07:43 PM
4

And then she will get the entire group disbanded because Joe Shmo sent her a dick pic. Or you know, just because.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 08:29 PM
5

Put out hate bait. Receive hate. Claim victimhood.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 01:59 AM
27

I’d actually be OK with egg donor, sperm donor. But we already have terms for that: mother, father.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 12:22 AM
57

Leave it to Canada to screw it up even more. They can’t even admit that every kid has a father.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 12:20 AM
7

Did it teach him that the patriarchy doesn’t exist, but if it did it would be glorious?
/r/MensRights01/01/24 04:33 PM
56

We need a legal fund for civil suits, because criminal law is not seeking justice.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:58 AM
3

Right below the article claiming Trump smells of armpits, ketchup and butt.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 04:11 PM
1

It wouldn’t be a trap if society wasn’t rigged to force a man to pay the woman that does this to him, through sexual bribery or this clear escalation. This could just as easily be her roommates boyfriend, her sister’s husband, or the guy whose house she cleans. All of them are immediately given equal access to his finances under the law. Hopefully this backfires and the laws are repealed when it’s advertised on the internet how easy it is to sperm jack an unsuspecting, non sexual partner.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 09:25 PM
60

Don’t worry, they kept all the white men as the Pharma CEOs, so we can really understand the new gender cooperation; men bad women good.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 10:02 PM
3

There is no such thing as incel. Everyone who is celebrate is voluntarily celebrate and that is a valid choice for people, especially men, regarding the risks associated with STDs, birth control, baby trapping, no say in pregnancy, child support, and lack of fathers’ rights. Dating apps and prostitutes exist for anyone who is interested in that. Women think they are entitled to men’s sperm because they know it gives them power over those men. They cannot stand when men withhold that power from t…
/r/MensRights07/12/23 05:52 PM
1

Same with Only Fans/ porn. The only consistency is that men are losers. The only winning move is not to play.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 05:32 PM
79

Single woman = empowering Single man = loser incel living in a basement who isn’t financially attractive enough to be worthy of any woman’s time and should probably just die -The Gaurdian
/r/MensRights25/11/23 05:25 PM
18

It’s funny how these mothers don’t specify which party engaged in the infidelity or intimate violence. They know the audience will assume it was the men, and that the audience will also believe it actually happened.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 10:32 PM
28

Now do a documentary about men get height surgery and taking steroids. This is not just a woman’s issue, they only care enough to mention the women who are affected.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 03:37 PM
60

Don’t they have a term for that when men are desensitized by too much masterbation? Not surprising there’s no term for that for women even though they’re far less likely to be able to get off.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 07:49 PM
16

Service is not the same as gender roles. Both genders should serve each other. The problem is when a man works 10 hours a day to bring home a paycheck for his family, it’s expected. When a woman does the dishes for 10 minutes a day, it’s seen as service.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 02:23 PM
2

Why do you think women want a man who treats them like an equal? They want a man who will serve them and they’re looking for six foot muscular men who make six figures, and treat them like a queen. Men like that are so obviously using them for sex it’s incredible they can’t see that.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 02:25 PM
1

If you love your friends so much, why don’t you marry them?
/r/MensRights22/10/23 01:55 PM
8

It’s the women who have a negative attitude towards tech companies.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 11:37 PM
1

Only it won’t even look like a revolution. It’ll just be men no longer taking or believing women’s BS. Once men no longer sympathize with women and stop catering to their requests for men to just leave, the game will be over. Maybe for society, but definitely for women who are disproportionately served by that society.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 02:12 PM
2

It’s really not a question of capability, it’s a question of responsibility. The argument that women are less capable so men must be held responsible needs to die.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 02:05 PM
22

If you think that men aren’t second class citizens under the law then you are the one who’s out of touch.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 09:02 PM
12

Why? Women used the same arguments while desegregating male only clubs, scouts, and social groups. And then turned around and set up their own women only spaces in their place.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 09:01 PM
19

I would agree to women’s spaces if men were allowed their own spaces. But I think the only logical conclusion will be separate is inherently unequal. Men will put into their spaces the things they value, while women will put into their spaces the things they value, and simultaneously complain that they don’t also have the things men value.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 08:56 PM
0

If 33% of cyclist trips are women, and only 18% of casualties are women, I would say the only gender it’s unsafe for is men.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 04:40 PM
6

Can you commit to following his leadership? Or do you feel he doesn’t have enough experience to know what’s right for you?
/r/RedPillWomen25/09/23 07:17 PM
1

I think you meant to say mom’s don’t want Chad’s around their kids. And they certainly don’t want to stick around with average Joes long enough to allow them to be fathers. Our legal system only allows fathers at the discretion of the mom. Don’t believe the stereotype when 75% of moms are kicking the father out of the family.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 03:15 AM
3

I would say American slavery was justified by claiming Africans were bigger and stronger, more immune to the heat of the Caribbean and therefore better suited to working the fields because of their black privilege. It sounds just as dumb. “We need to discriminate against men because men are in power, but only in enough power to be discriminated against by us, not enough to discriminate against us.”
/r/MensRights21/09/23 01:49 PM
26

It’s almost like false accusers target rich powerful men instead of poor useless men.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 01:46 PM
7

The worst insult a woman can imagine for a man is one who isn’t worthy of having sex with.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 11:56 PM
3

Girls don’t get strong by Nikki fighting their fights for them. Just the opposite, we get strong boys because no one fights for them. Strong boys become strong men become strong leaders. Fundamental misunderstanding of the problem.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 04:03 AM
1

It’s not a double standard because she’s not talking about the same women. If 10% of women slept with 10 different men each ( a drastic reduction for some women ), that covers 100% of men while 90% of women remain virgins. I’m not advocating this position, just explaining the math.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 01:45 PM
3

I also couldn’t find any gender breakdown of the victims, which from the articles appear to be majority boys. No one is even willing to state that boys were most effected.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 04:21 PM
3

Why would you need a provider if you make 6 figures? Maybe those men are interested in providing for women who appreciate it, not ones who already have it. Maybe those men see you as less likely to give up your salary to stay at home and play with babies. Men want to provide for a family, not give money away to a woman. That’s not the same thing.
/r/RedPillWomen19/08/23 01:50 PM
8

This is a case where the medium is the message. I used to think some women would use the false allegation to send a message to the man that wronged them. That sending them to prison was a torture they wanted to inflict on the man. Now I realize that the message of sending the man to prison is actually irrelevant. The false allegation itself is the message, and the means by which torture is inflicted on their victim, before any verdict is reached. In this case 2.5 years of torture, putting his li…
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:24 PM
2

That’s an interesting point, but this “patriarchy” in the real world doesn’t currently exist. The movie is saying look at how unfair it was to women 100 years ago, and we know, that’s why we’ve moved past the way women were treated then. You and I agree that the Kens are treated way worse than women are today. Why make a movie to say don’t treat people like this when literally no one is treating people like that except in her movie?
/r/MensRights12/08/23 03:26 AM
7

Maybe they’re happy getting laid by married women knowing the husband can’t find out.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 03:15 AM
3

So the message was it’s ok to oppress the ken’s of society until they earn it? It’s an interesting message when you apply your analogy that the Kens represent women. That would mean that it’s OK to oppress women for the last 100 years. It’s unfair, but the world is unfair after all. Was the point of the movie that feminism can be just as oppressive as patriarchy? I don’t think that’s what Greta was selling. Barbie has been around for 80 years, and still no Kens on the Supreme Court.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 03:10 AM
15

Good for her, but she’s naive if she thinks men don’t get ripped off at mechanics, or women couldn’t possibly rip a woman off. You have to have feminist blinders on to not see that. I’m sure when she fails she will blame the patriarchy into brainwashing women to think a female mechanic couldn’t be as good as a male mechanic.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 01:29 PM
2

Men will marry a pretty woman, even if she is poor. Women will marry a rich man, even if he is ugly. You won’t find too many examples of the reverse.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 08:26 PM
3

The issue is tribalism. Politics has exploited this aspect of human nature in the form of identity politics. Social media has exploited this as the Algorithm, or the Bubble. People enter into their own bubbles, where everything inside is accepted as good and everything outside is accepted as bad. There is currently very little cross pollination of ideas or compromise because Good doesn’t negotiate with Bad. Everyone has someone to blame, and that makes them feel Good. Feminism blames men for eve…
/r/MensRights06/08/23 04:47 PM
1

I agree, not only is it an impossible goal, it’s a bad goal.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 02:07 AM
2

So it was a 1/4x for you and 8x for her.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 02:06 AM
28

Boomers got divorced when they were young, boomers get divorced when they’re old. Shocking. And divorce doesn’t cut your nest egg in half, it doubles your expenses. It’s an important difference because people think they will have the same lifestyle after divorce since it’s the same amount of money per capita. Only now that money has to pay for two households and it doesn’t last as long.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 07:50 PM
14

Con me once, shame on me. Con me twice, here’s all my money, I guess you earned it.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 07:37 PM
3

That’s an interesting point. I’ve always heard of it’s not 50/50 it must be because of discrimination. But that is ridiculous for the reasons you state, there are proportions still well within the expected and probable outcomes. Also, if women are over-represented in some fields, education, nursing, then mathematically they have to be underrepresented in other fields. By cherry picking those fields, they guarantee they get the answer they wanted. But you can’t resolve underrepresentation without…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 03:54 PM
3

What is contradictory about be thin and rich? And also don’t be mean. And why does she think she should get a medal for it? It’s not a very convincing argument for the plight of women. And why be upset that she can’t be rude or selfish? The rest seems like an argument against feminism, which says women have to be strong and brave and not show weakness. She’s complaining about the feminists who tell women they have to be men, but not about how men are told all that in the first place.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 03:25 PM
1

Democrats are taking us back to when a woman couldn’t withdraw money without her husband’s permission, but this time to protect women.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 01:49 PM
3

Feminism uses a perceived injustice to rationalize true injustices.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:19 AM
3

The concept of “the patriarchy” was invented to villainize men. Of course it has a negative impact on men, but not the ways you’re implying.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 03:12 AM
169

Strange how feminist barbieland has no males on the Supreme Court but the “patriarchal” real world is actually 4/9 female. Let that sink in, feminist equality = 0 men, patriarchy = half women. What a weird example for them to show how progressive and fair the feminist barbieland is.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 09:26 PM
2

Check her body measurements, that’s why.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 04:02 AM
1

She didn’t give up her career, she started a new job taking care of the household where she was the boss and was paid half her husband’s income. She later quit or was fired from this job, and decided she wants to keep the salary without doing the job. In any other situation people would think this is crazy, people leave their jobs and salaries all the time. But when it’s a housewife they just lose their ability to be reasonable.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 05:27 PM
3

This is how you guarantee men are #NotWithUs. How about expecting women to do their own work?
/r/MensRights12/07/23 05:09 PM
1

And the James Gunn situation.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 06:48 PM
1

He was maintaining that lifestyle with his entire salary. The only way he maintains that lifestyle is if there’s no money left over for his household.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 08:54 PM
3

Victims rarely stop to ask themselves if they are actually the baddies.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 05:21 PM
1

I agree, not everyone is. They could have easily put both lines on the same axis since they’re both percentages, but consciously changed it, leading to a visual appearance contrary to the underlying data. The goal of showing trends could have been accomplished using a single axis, why change it?
/r/MensRights14/06/23 05:15 PM
9

What a terrible visual chart. Male participation at 69% and female participation at 57%, but it graphs women above men??
/r/MensRights14/06/23 12:07 AM
2

Charge her with attempted murder.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 04:23 PM
1

Wait until they research which racial group drops the most n** racial slurs.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 07:20 PM
74

A bunch of women getting together to talk about the importance of women in leadership. Fascinating.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 04:30 AM
56

Someone different. Let’s not pretend there’s reason in the decision.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 01:42 PM
1

You have to understand the feminist mindset. No one thinks less of women than feminists. They want women to be men. The fact is they don’t think women can compete with men unless men are only 10% of the population. But that doesn’t change the root of the problem. It’s not that women can’t compete with men, it’s that they don’t want to. They’d much rather be taken care of by men. There aren’t many female plumbers, not because women can’t be plumbers, but because women don’t want to be plumbers. A…
/r/MensRights13/04/23 04:25 AM
2

She finds it disgusting that men are willing to voluntarily provide financial support for young innocent women working a difficult with absolutely no expectations of anything in return.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 02:05 AM
6

The majority of single moms are supported by single dads through child support.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 10:19 PM
21

Yes, women are less happy. Explain why this is good news and it’s actually men’s fault after all. Feminists are deluded, and they will continue to double down as long as they have credit. No one forced women to do the dishes in a “second shift” and if women are single they should do their own damned dishes. There seems to be this assumption that all women have some man loafing around making them cook and clean even though women haven’t needed a man for 50 years. If the relationship isn’t fair, t…
/r/MensRights23/03/23 05:01 AM
2

This continues with the observation that there are more male CEOs, therefore men must be oppressing women from being CEOs. It’s reductive and ignores the characteristics that drive that minority of males to the position, as well as the costs in stress, responsibilities, and time.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 04:21 AM
2

I should have known, men can never be victims.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 06:08 PM
1

The man.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 04:19 PM
1

It’s literally called your birthday, not your conception day. You may be alive before then, but we only celebrate the years from a successful live birth. This isn’t complicated if you choose to use your brain instead of your straw men.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 04:18 PM
2

I’m old enough for that reference.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 05:26 AM
2

The only man you are responsible for is yourself. Ask her if she is a slut for not calling out women for being sluts and being complacent about all the women out there who are sluts.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 12:07 AM
24

Let’s write an article about how men feel disadvantaged, but from the perspective of a woman who worked her way to the top of the toxic male chauvinism.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 11:34 PM
4

Ask them which problem is worse, one woman who tries to kill herself 5 times, or 5 men who kill themselves once.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 03:59 PM
1

Ask them which problem is worse, one woman who tries to kill herself 5 times, or 5 men who kill themselves once.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 03:59 PM
2

Men are more likely to be falsely accused of rape than a woman is to be raped. Why is that? Because a man will be prosecuted for rape, and a woman has no consequences for false accusations.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 02:27 PM
2

It’s interesting that the women who are concerned about men looking at them specifically post pictures of themselves to the internet for men to look at. It’s unclear if they want privacy or publicity. But their actions speak louder than their words.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 03:52 AM
16

Women are more natural and men are more rational. Women brag about being more in tune with mother nature, why can’t men brag about being more in tune with the rational, like reason, loyalty, honor, self control?
/r/MensRights12/02/23 04:41 PM
5

I like to believe we’re not fighting against women, we’re fighting against a system that was set up by mostly men to protect mostly women. The system creates incentives for women to behave badly. The system creates enforcement when women behave badly. Take away the crooked system, and we will still have bad women and bad men, but it won’t be as profitable for women or damaging to men for women to be bad.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 03:38 PM
3

Rich people can afford private security so they are less likely to get robbed. And if they do get robbed, it’s their fault for not having more security. And besides it doesn’t matter if a rich person gets robbed because losing some money doesn’t hurt them as much as when a poor person is robbed.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 04:00 AM
4

I know they have that reputation, but in my experience, they are not. It leads me to believe that that stereotype comes from a earlier time when the mother could tell the father to spank Billy for talking back to her when the dad wasn’t there, and then comfort Billy after the father taught him the lesson, like good cop bad cop. Now we seem to be finding increasing child abuse rates among mothers. Even though men have always been portrayed as the abusers, there was always a woman standing behind …
/r/MensRights05/02/23 08:51 PM
7

“Well you see Mom, girls I’ve dated tend to be emotionally manipulative, they give conditional gifts and attention based on if I agree with what they’re saying. When something I say upsets them, they lash out and break my stuff. When they agree to do something for me, they can just as easily change their mind based on how they feel at the moment. I can’t be myself around them because I’m too afraid of what will happen if they get mad and I have no idea what the next thing to set them off will be…
/r/MensRights05/02/23 04:44 PM
2

Angry feminist mom encourages son to be bisexual, shocked and insulted that he prefers men over women.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 04:06 PM
10

What if it’s fathers that are the compassionate ones? What if “Boys will be boys” is a compassionate statement meant to encourage empathy and not a statement of enabling the behavior. It’s the same statement as, “Kids say dumb things,” it’s meant as don’t take it personally, don’t overly judge them, and don’t expect them them to be men when they’re just boys.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 04:04 PM
13

“I gave him everything after I kicked his ungrateful father out of the family. What did I do to deserve this?”
/r/MensRights05/02/23 03:59 PM
1

Divorce proceeding occur only after the divorce has been filed. So they are as good as divorced since one party can’t stop a divorce from proceeding once filed. They’re as good as divorced. Married people can still live in separate houses without having child support ordered. It’s not about the parents being apart.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 04:15 AM
7

It should be illegal. It’s discrimination based on marital status. Married parents don’t have to pay child support, only unmarried parents do.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 03:30 PM
3

The majority of men are kicked out of the family by divorce and custody is taken from them by the court. I wouldn’t call that abandonment.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 03:28 PM
1

Play stupid games, when stupid prizes.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 03:08 PM
25

You’re referring to a marketing problem or an optics problem. Overturning Roe improved equality between men and women, but it really pissed some women off who were going to blame men for everything anyway. Let’s not forget that half the people who are pro-life are women. So I wouldn’t expect an MRA to favor looking good to women who hate them over improving equality.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 12:21 AM
1

Lesbians
/r/MensRights12/01/23 03:33 PM
2

Marriage may not benefit women, but divorce sure does, but it requires marriage first.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 07:03 AM
17

It must be interesting to go through life thinking men don’t like you because you’re too smart and attractive.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 04:38 PM
16

I wonder if the “gender earnings gap” could be explained by the average height difference in men and women.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 02:13 PM
8

Imagine being so disconnected from real world consequences that you think killing men would lead to men negotiating with you, instead of throwing you in jail to be prosecuted by law.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 01:20 AM
2

Involuntary Celibate is itself a euphemism for virgin, meant for academics to avoid the inherent bias of the term male virgin. The fact that the academic term has itself become the slur that it replaced tells you depths of disgust women have for virgin males.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 09:17 PM
1

Everyone is pro-life when it comes to men.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 04:12 PM
59

Why are women praised for being virgins but men are shunned and insulted for being incels? I think that will answer the question.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 04:05 PM
0

Very one thinks supporting your child is a good thing. What’s evil is the underlying government assumption that a man can’t/won’t support his kids unless forced to do so under court order. Also, the idea that a kid is entitled not just to their father’s support, but specifically their financial support and specifically 10% of their income or more. It’s like saying the dad has to buy the name brand clothes for his kids if he can afford instead of generic knockoffs, instead of saving and investing…
/r/MensRights04/12/22 04:54 PM
1

My dumb hookup at 21 turned into a 9 year marriage and 16 years of child support. 5 years, 1 month to go.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 04:43 PM
1

Even if he cheated, legal marriage is not a lifetime commitment anymore. It certainly isn’t for women.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 03:00 PM
3

A binding contract of roles and responsibilities. What are they going to do if the man doesn’t uphold his end of the contract, divorce him?
/r/MensRights27/11/22 05:50 PM
2

Feminism only exists if you believe women are victims. You can only believe women are victims if you believe women are less than men, less strong, less powerful, less smart… this is what the movement believes in. I believe women are protected by men, as evidenced by the many government programs aimed at helping women specifically. These same programs feed the narrative that women are less capable than men, which feeds the narrative that they are oppressed by men, which feeds the narrative that t…
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:17 AM
0

If feminism is the assertion that everyone is deserving of rights, regardless of gender, what rights does the wage gap infringe on? Is it the right to a fair wage? Where is this right granted? Wages are determined by capitalist market forces, not rights granted by the government. How would the government even manage what a fair wage is? Is it the right for a woman to work where she chooses to work? Clearly feminism disagrees with the career choices women in aggregate are making. Are women not sm…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:44 PM
18

And then you’ll be portrayed as a woman oppressing, DV supporting anti woman’s vote sexist.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:03 PM
90

Russian Mothers are Turning Deadbeat Dads into Dead Dads.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 06:32 PM
84

Venus blade costs more! Then buy the men’s blade. But the Venus blade is better! That’s why it costs more.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 06:17 PM
15

In the US we call that Divorce.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 03:03 PM
1

So do abortion bans. Thank you for proving my point.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 05:29 AM
1

That’s like saying murder is a religious issue because of the first commandment. Religious issues deal with the supernatural, the existence of a soul, or god, or afterlife. Abortion is a real thing, and there are secular reasons to be for or against it, just like murder, stealing, and being kind to your neighbor.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 12:29 PM
6

Every woman who chooses to go into nursing is personally slapping Mr. Cook in the face. Why can’t people with basic math understand if there is an over-representation anywhere, there must be under-representations elsewhere. There is no way to have 70% women in teaching and nursing, but also 50% women everywhere else. Those women have to come from somewhere, like science and programming. If you want to improve under-representation, you have to limit the fields of over-representation and limit tea…
/r/MensRights28/09/22 01:42 PM
1

Except there aren’t any atheists who go to church, but there are atheists who are against abortion.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 02:18 AM
28

It’s funny how atheism tries to make abortion a religious issue even though Biden is pro abortion and Catholic. If there are Christians on both sides, then it’s not a religious issue.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 12:57 PM
0

Wages for housework = $1,000/month Cost of Room and Board = $3,000/ month I guess men should start collecting money now.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:29 PM
0

I’m not in favor of Financial Abortion. I’m against child support. End Child Support and there’s no need for Financial Abortion. Give all parents the right to provide for their children in the way they see fit. Not all parents give their kids 20% of their income and they still turn out fine. Child Support is the cause for the need for Financial Abortion. Remove the cause.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:13 PM
8

By today’s standards that’s such toxic masculinity. Imagine thinking the mother of your children can’t fight off a wolf pack with her moxy.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 04:18 PM
10

1,000 years ago, physical strength was key to survival. Instead of enslaving women into breeding harems like the handmaid tale would have us all believe, men married them, took care of them, and protected them. Presentism says that was peak misogyny because today women can make a living sitting in air conditioned offices just like the men do, and it was only the slavery of marriage that prevented women from working in the mines and dying in battle.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 03:30 PM
-3

For context on how she has been fighting the toxic masculinity objectifying women her whole career. https://player.vimeo.com/video/73851503?h=33077ab206 Edit: NSFW
/r/MensRights18/09/22 09:12 PM
12

If they don’t want men to be a part of the breeding process, that just leaves more time for men to become CEOs and less time for them.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 01:00 AM
3

Yes, and it’s because those women do not want to take responsibility for their actions or their consequences. As a man, I’m much more likely to be the victim of violence, so I take responsibility for my actions and stay away from certain areas at certain hours of the night. Because I take responsibility for my actions, I can try and protect myself regardless of the sex or race of the potential attacker. Since they do not, they can only focus on what their potential attacker should or should not …
/r/MensRights14/09/22 04:03 AM
18

That’s the definition of the DEI movement, if it’s not 50% women then it’s because of sexism. Which is why they introduced quotas to force more women, because inequality is assumed to caused by sexism, not merit. So if diversity isn’t reflective of the candidate pool, yes, sexism is assumed.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 03:00 AM
2

Maybe it would balance out if they also required the first two applicants to be white/asian or male. /s
/r/MensRights31/08/22 10:44 PM
2

This is true, the men they were sexually experimenting with were different than the men that weren’t sleeping around and expected the same from their partner.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:33 AM
1

Obvious sample bias, the men they were sleeping around with and wanted to sleep with were sleeping around a lot. And of course they were sleeping around because they weren’t in or seeking a monogamous relationship. Yet they thought sleeping with these men would lead to a relationship. And they couldn’t understand that men can have different standards for different roles. It’s not hypocritical to want to sleep with whores and marry virgins. Just like I get a chef for cooking and a barber for hair…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 10:09 PM
13

You keep your job by catering to voters. Mostly female voters.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 05:06 PM
8

Politicians are supposed to serve the voters. They’re not leaders, they’re servants.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 04:03 PM
9

Date the pimps, marry the simps. Advice that has ruined a generation.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 02:39 PM
4

I’m more concerned with open misandry than “wokeness.” How about Bad Sisters, which advertises itself as a group of girls plot to murder a man they don’t like? How many other shows use the premise that he deserves to die because he asked me to smile. These are protagonists, who we are supposed to side with, who do these terrible things, not the villains. Captain Marvel - steal guy’s motorcycle because he asked her to smile She Hulk - Smash guys who ask her if she’s OK at a bar Kevin can F himsel…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 03:30 PM
4

But agent 007 is not what the movie is about. It’s about James Bond, who happens to carry the code name 007.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 02:59 PM
7

LOL, what are they going to do, start dating gay men? They can complain all they want, straight men are still the only game in town that can give them what they really want.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 04:16 AM
22

In her case, how she was treated also stemmed from the fact that she was a poser. She was lying to herself and those around her, thinking that she had them fooled, when in reality they knew shew was not authentic but were polite to her anyway. This is more likely why she felt alone as a man, she was distanced from men because she was not authentic with herself or those men. And concluding that men are lonely because she was lonely ( as a pretend man ) isn’t applicable. Based on her suicidal thou…
/r/MensRights19/08/22 03:57 PM
125

Women don’t think it’s funny because it jokes that they commit paternity fraud. Men don’t think it’s funny because it makes committing paternity fraud a joke.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 12:31 PM
8

Why do homeowners spend thousands of dollars on home security when we could be spending that money on programs to teach burglars not to burgle? Instead of teaching homeowners how to protect their home we should just teach people not to steal.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 12:19 AM
5

She decided to eat her cake, but is upset that she can’t have it, too. How unfortunate for her that women are biologically responsible for the life of a child, but that really isn’t society’s fault. It’s unfortunate that men are biologically stronger than women and society forces them to fight in wars. Somehow, in her mind, having to take care of your own child is worse than having to fight and die for your country. Also, society makes sure that dad gives you half his stuff in marriage or pays y…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 02:19 PM
46

When are gyms going to stop enabling this predatory behavior by banning the use of cameras in their facilities? Their customers deserve to work out without being filmed by voyeuristic perverts taking videos of men working out without their permission. I’m sure all it will take for national outrage is a single man to start taking and posting pictures of women in the gym who look at him without his permission.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 12:32 PM
24

Women will never be equals until they’re equally accountable for their actions.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 03:48 PM
3

2 hours of laundry is more work than 1 hour of mowing the lawn, so why won’t women switch with their husbands? /s
/r/MensRights04/08/22 04:41 PM
1

Just like any day care spends their money on rent and activities for the children.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 03:22 PM
0

I agree with you, I think money has nothing to do with the fitness of the parent. Which is why I don’t understand why the court system thinks giving a parent money makes them a better parent. On one hand, it doesn’t matter how much money you have to be a good parent, on the other hand, you have to have money from the other parent to be a better parent.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 02:45 AM
0

Child support is paying the mother as hired help.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 02:42 AM
1

This is the truth, it should only be awarded based on financial needs of the child, not based on the highest earner. If both parents make 100k, why assign additional support for the kid who already has basic needs met?
/r/MensRights04/08/22 01:13 AM
2

Somebody can be very poor and also a terrible parent. We have poor people who raise kids every day, it’s a consequence of allowing poor people the freedom to have children.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 01:07 AM
2

No one owes their children anything. The fact that we allow parents to put their children up for adoption, or abortion, proves society accepts this fact. Whatever is given to children is gifted, it is not an entitlement. Child support is only meant to punish the most financially secure DNA provider, which coincidentally is the father 95% of the time.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 11:31 PM
0

Exactly, the support parent is only going to take the time to audit if there is concern of abuse by the supported parent. It’s a self policing system.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 04:00 PM
0

Not by the government, by the support parent.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 02:46 PM
2

It’s not a burden to single parents. Paying fathers are also single parents. It’s a burden on those receiving the benefits of additional child support. If they don’t want that burden they can always decline that benefit.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 02:20 PM
5

Plus there’s always the argument, if a pedicure makes mom happy, that’s good for the kids.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 02:16 PM
3

It’s a bank account. How do you manage your utilities and bills? You pay with a debit card and you set up auto draft for a portion of rent/ bills. It’s that easy.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 02:13 PM
0

You don’t need to check receipts, just the store alone would tell you if it’s reasonable or not, just use a debit card.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 02:10 PM
6

You can get insurance on anything. But with a short term and a low life expectancy, the insurance would be high and not worth it. Why wouldn’t a woman take out life insurance and then have an abortion to collect? Normally, life insurance is to offset a risk, such as a losing the income of a head of household, which helps the family survive the lost income. What is life insurance on the unborn mitigating that makes it worth purchasing? Why would men pay child support when the child doesn’t exist …
/r/MensRights20/07/22 04:49 AM
1

I didn’t say anyone has to raise a human. You asked for a reason for marriage and I gave you my answer, fatherhood and religion. If you’re not into that you don’t need marriage. But there’s no reason to believe marriage is outdated just because you’re not into it. Millions of people are, and that won’t change.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:46 PM
24

I consented to sex, I did not consent to giving away my sperm. It was a temporary loan agreement only. Just because I invite you in my house doesn’t mean you can take my TV.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 03:20 AM
1

You say marriage is outdated, but you also say marriage for love is a recent concept. Marriage for love was never a functional concept. The bonding experience without raising kids is just hookup culture, why would you promote that over marriage for building families? That’s currently reducing fathers to sperm and child support. Historically, we wouldn’t have fatherhood without marriage. Unfortunately it has changed from an institution that granted men rights to an institution that penalizes men …
/r/MensRights10/07/22 11:33 PM
2

By virtue of the baby coming out of her, her parental relationship is not disputed. The man relies on the mom to vouch for him, as paternity tests are not used to establish indisputable fatherhood. Where have you seen successful families and communities without the concept of marriage? Or are you just saying it can be done, not that it ever in the the history of human society has actually been done?
/r/MensRights10/07/22 10:49 PM
8

The one common thread is that men are not welcome anywhere, and women make sure men enforce those rules.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 10:42 PM
7

While men are far more likely to be victims of violent crimes including homicide, these women say they live in fear and use their fear as a weapon to silence the majority of victims. I don’t think they truly live in fear because someone who was afraid would change their behavior to avoid the danger, while they use their fear to change other’s behavior.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 10:17 PM
2

Marriage as a legal institution is a joke. Marriage started and can only work as a religious institution. It requires the support of more than just two people’s promises to each other. For what it is, it’s still the only way to build families and communities. When communities stop supporting marriage they fail. Marriage is the best way we have to protect father’s rights, as corrupted as that is. Women have natural parental rights through birth, fathers need social institutions to support their r…
/r/MensRights10/07/22 05:58 PM
1

They’re just words, women all want a man who can take care of them, emotionally, financially, sexually. She’ll never get that while she openly says she will not take care of him in return. What she wants is a slave, not a lover. Men are looking for mothers for long term relationships because they need someone to care for the family while they support the family.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 02:11 PM
2

For someone who hangs out on Men’s Rights forums, you sure have a low opinion of men. No one owes anyone damages for pregnancy. Women should take responsibility for their own bodies and not continue blaming men for everything that happens to them, and then expecting some kind of payment for it. That strategy will only lead to women’s continued dependency on men.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 10:20 PM
2

You make a lot of interesting points. Tell me how this bill solves a single one of them. But then you make the analogy that getting pregnant is like getting hit by a car and I have to wonder if you know where babies come from. In my experience, it’s always the woman who begs me to raw dog her with promises that she’s on the pill and can’t get pregnant. Does that sound like the person who was unexpectedly hit by a car, or the one that caused the accident in the first place? Women love to argue th…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 08:50 PM
3

You make it sound like extortion. I’m pretty sure I understand the point you’re trying to make, i just don’t agree it’s a winning strategy. There are a lot of men who are pro choice. This bill is placing a sexist penalty on men for accidental pregnancy. Pro choice men decide not to vote for Democratic lawmakers who threaten them with penalties. Pro life Republicans win the elections and restrict abortion rights further. Is that the big brain trust over at Democratic HQ?
/r/MensRights08/07/22 07:53 PM
2

If women don’t want to raise the child, they can give the dad custody or give it up for adoption. They want to raise the child to get money from the dad. If women were concerned about the costs, why do they fight for sole legal custody? Why should the dad pay for something the mom wants to do? And if she doesn’t want to do it, why couldn’t she give custody to someone that does want to raise the child. In Ohio the woman still has a choice up to 6 weeks after pregnancy. The man has no choice after…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 07:42 PM
2

So this is what feminists mean when they say they’re promoting equality. Since women are able to get pregnant, men should have to pay them for getting pregnant. Why don’t we simplify it, instead of $5k for an unwanted pregnancy, we just make men pay all women $85 for sex and $35 for a handjob? This senator is not fooling anyone, she wants women to be paid for sex because she thinks they’re whores. That’s really not fair to women.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 07:28 PM
2

So your position is both men and women can take responsibility for birth control, only the woman gets the choice over reproduction, and women should get paid if they accidentally get pregnant? What does the man get if she accidentally gets pregnant against his will? It’s all her body her choice his wallet with you all.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 07:14 PM
3

Ok, maybe you don’t think our country’s current political position is in turmoil. No worries mate. That’s all I’m trying to say, no hidden subtext. Men and women vote, men and women are responsible for our current political position, a position which i don’t think is particularly good. As exemplified by a female politician looking to punish men for the crime of being fertile. Pretty f’d up if you ask me.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 07:03 PM
3

Are you driving at something? I meant our position as in situation of political turmoil, not our position on a political topic.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 05:01 PM
7

The political position of the United States of America. Our (country’s) political situation, all Americans are in the American political situation. The position we’re in as a country, not the position of a particular party platform. We’re all in this position, whether you agree or disagree.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:56 PM
3

If she becomes pregnant, she has a choice? And the man should be responsible for paying for her choice no matter what it is? Birth control is on the woman because it’s her body that gets pregnant, and she’s in charge of what goes in and out of her body. If I ask someone to slap me, how am I going to sue them for making my cheek red? What about male prostitutes? She pays him to have sex with her, and then sues him for … having sex with her?
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:51 PM
3

Who is responsible? The Supreme Court , and elected officials.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:37 PM
6

Our current position is no longer a constitutional protection for abortion, only state legislative protections for abortion. Unfortunately, those protections are voted on, and pro choice supporters would prefer an unelected minority decide the fate of their rights.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:35 PM
8

What aspect of her life is she responsible for? Are women unable to prevent becoming pregnant without a man’s help? Are they too horny to be responsible for birth control? I find your views of women demeaning to women.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:31 PM
6

And if she doesn’t spread her legs, she never gets pregnant.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:07 PM
9

“Level the playing field” to have an “honest debate?” They are holding a gun to men’s head until they cave to their demands. And guess what? 10/10 pro life women don’t give a damn what you do to men. You think men are responsible for our political position today?
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:06 PM
0

How do we tell a matriarchy from a patriarchy? They both only focus on protecting women.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:59 PM
6

She assumed the position first.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:58 PM
2

Sounds like they’re working on building the perfect traditional patriarchal society, where women are served first, women and men don’t associate together, and men pay for everything.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:38 PM
3

Let’s see how that strategy works for them in the next election.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:08 PM
1

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:07 PM
5

This gives her a chance to get the child support and abort the baby.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:03 PM
14

Women should take that up with God and nature, not men.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 02:51 PM
21

Some men on the Supreme Court were vocal in their opinion, what does she think about them?
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:15 PM
1

If false rape allegations go up, that will be bad for men short term, but it will be devastating for female rape victims long term. And probably good for real rapists as well to get off more easily. I hope that isn’t what women want.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:51 AM
5

That depends on if the baby is a woman, apparently.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:41 AM
7

This is equality.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:34 AM
1

I’m hearing you say that contraception is the problem. Half the women getting abortions were using contraception and they still got pregnant from having sex even though they didn’t want to be? It sounds like contraception convinced women who didn’t want to have kids that they could have sex without getting pregnant. Maybe these women wouldn’t have had sex if they had known contraception does not prevent pregnancy.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:28 AM
2

It’s just one gender that is discovering a privilege they thought was a right is no longer protected from being taken away. A privilege the other gender never had. Now is the time to come together on both men and women being able to legally renounce their parental rights and responsibilities. After women support men on these gender neutral rights, then we can look at what abortion allowances make sense.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:14 AM
8

And if you are in one of those states to make abortion illegal, that’s just Democracy. You’re fighting democracy, and the majority of people don’t think a woman’s right to choose trumps a baby’s right to life.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:08 AM
2

But in the name of equality.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 12:30 AM
10

If fathers are so important why can’t they get custody half the time?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 05:26 AM
1

People forget Nazis were a victimist movement just like feminists, they believed Germans were victims of a powerful Jewish conspiracy, just like feminist believe in a powerful patriarchal conspiracy. Supremacists always start as victimists.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 05:03 AM
8

I don’t think you understand that the defense is entitled to do an investigation as much as the prosecution. If the defense wants to review the accusers phone, they are absolutely allowed to do that because finding evidence of innocence is just as important as finding evidence of guilt. The prosecution might not want the phone looked at because they have all the evidence they need, but the defense might investigate the accusers phone to find that the accuser claims to have been raped in his apar…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 03:04 AM
12

I’d be smiling and eating candy if all the evidence in my trial was going as well as it is for him.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 10:48 PM
33

Not because he used a strap in instead of a penis, because he lied to them about what he was sticking inside their vagina. Let’s be clear about what the charges are, it has nothing to do with him being trans.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 12:53 PM
23

Pretty much what happened to hurricanes.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 02:52 AM
1

I’m sorry this men’s rights sub doesn’t sympathize with the concerns and desires of women enough for your liking.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 09:47 PM
1

That my point. Christians have a lot of laws, you’re just pointing out the ones you disagree with, while ignoring the ones you do agree with, like murder.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 09:39 PM
1

So do you think laws against murder are about the theocracy? Or do you only blame the theocracy for laws you disagree with?
/r/MensRights11/05/22 02:50 AM
1

Fathers are guaranteed 50/50 custody of any biological offspring. Fathers have the first right of refusal before a woman can give away a kid. Abortions are illegal or abortions are legal for the woman and Fathers can relinquish parental responsibilities before birth or within 3 months of a confirmed paternity test. If women can opt out of parenthood make it so men have to opt in.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 02:31 AM
1

You seem to be missing the point. Parents, married or divorced, are not obligated to spend any money on the child, as long as there is no neglect or abuse. However, when divorced parents share custody, the parent who makes more money is treated to extremely intrusive government oversight to prove that they spend a fixed amount of money on their child, subject to arrest if they don’t. The only way to prove they are spending the money on supporting the child, is to give it to the other parent, who…
/r/MensRights11/05/22 02:20 AM
1

Some men want to have children. They still have no legal say in their reproduction, even if they’re married. How does a vasectomy solve that?
/r/MensRights10/05/22 01:49 PM
1

But if there’s no obligation to spend child support money on supporting the child, why even have it? The father may or may not spend the money on the child, and the mother may or may not spend money on the child. It’s a purely punitive measure on the paying parent.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 04:33 AM
-4

The Republican strategy of driving the liberal females out of their state is starting to make a lot more sense.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 02:47 AM
1

Again we come back to the basic premise of your argument that she has to get paid for her biology. And yes, people can sue for something that was taken that they never had. An example would be when a woman sued a man for alimony to compensate her for the lost wages she could have received, but never did, because she was a stay at home wife for 10 years. Even if she never planned to work in the first place. It seems like the world is stacked in women’s favor, but denied when a man asks for the sa…
/r/MensRights08/05/22 04:06 AM
2

It’s a special breed of bully that gets other men to stand up and bully for them. We need to be standing up for ourselves.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 04:00 AM
2

That’s great to hear. What are you referring to specifically?
/r/MensRights07/05/22 09:03 PM
0

You make some good points, especially about encouraging people to have unsafe sex if they can abandon the child consequence free. I would say taxpayers already support many people who are on welfare and we don’t consider them cucks of the state. One change that seems reasonable is income cutoffs for receiving child support. There are many women who make over $100,000 that receive child support, simply because their baby daddy makes 200,000. People should be able to agree that that child is not s…
/r/MensRights07/05/22 08:50 PM
10

This is the argument that no one wants to have. While women are fighting for the right to abort their babies, there are men are fighting for their rights to raise their babies. It paints feminists in a bad light, so of course they put the spotlight on men for not paying child support, and men who don’t want to be fathers. Abortion is good for men too assumes no men want to be fathers, and that no man can raise a child on their own.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 05:34 PM
3

That sounds great. What reproductive rights does it include for men?
/r/MensRights07/05/22 03:08 PM
1

How much money is a child entitled to at birth from the father? What about poor dads, disabled dads, imprisoned dads, dads with mental illness, drug addiction, or homelessness? Who will give that human child the resources it needs? Don’t pretend this is about taking care of the child, our society has taken care of children since before money existed. This is about punishing the sperm donor.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 03:06 PM
1

I agree and was relating the unfair transfer of wealth to the perceived wage gap issue.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 02:56 PM
3

That’s a very balanced approach. Let’s work towards that.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 02:49 PM
2

Women should not be allowed to use my sperm without my consent. My sperm, my body, my choice. Anything less is baby rape. /s
/r/MensRights07/05/22 02:47 PM
0

Women will oppose men’s rights if they don’t get what they want first? Interesting strategy, maybe men should oppose women’s rights until we get what we want first.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 02:43 PM
3

There’s not much bodily autonomy in the draft, jumping off a building, or for shooting heroine. The point I’m making is that the right to bodily autonomy doesn’t exist. It was made up by feminists who want to do whatever they want.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 02:41 PM
3

Abortion isn’t the issue here, mate. A man’s paternity rights are the issue. If the only paternity right you can think of is the right for the woman to have an abortion, then you need to expand your mind.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 02:33 PM
6

If anything, women have more choices for safe sex and still don’t. Must be men’s fault though /s
/r/MensRights07/05/22 02:19 PM
1

I feel for you. I don’t expect you to stand in the way of her choice. I would just like society to respect men enough to even acknowledge the father by including them in what’s happening. A potential father has the right to know at least? At the very least wouldn’t that teach him to change his behavior and be more careful so he doesn’t impregnate another woman that’s not ready? Men are being blamed for causing abortions when half the time they don’t even know it was something they did.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 02:16 PM
1

No, fewer men will have PIV sex.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 05:46 AM
4

To a feminist, all problems look like a male.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 05:32 AM
1

It just goes to show their argument isn’t about life, it’s about money. How would they reply if you said, “Yes, life begins at conception and we will pay child support from that point, but since abortion is now murder it is illegal.”
/r/MensRights07/05/22 05:31 AM
2

I agree with you. I just made a post about staying out of this fight and had plenty of comments on how we need to be pro choice because solidarity. What about solidarity with the pro choice women? We should stay away and let the pro choice women fight the pro life women. Feminists know they will lose this fight without their male feminists. I say we have more important things to do. Although sex insurance is not a bad idea. Morally it’s terrible but financially it has potential. Plenty of people…
/r/MensRights07/05/22 05:24 AM
3

I bet it’s more than 21 cents on the dollar. That’s how child support is calculated. If the mom makes 79c and the dad makes 100c, the court wants to make sure the father spends 20c on the child by forcing him to pay it to the mom. Now she has 99c and he has 80c. Hooray equality.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 05:14 AM
4

I don’t know why you think women aren’t able to feed their kids. I’m not trying to co-opt the issue, I’m trying to ignore the issue and talk about guaranteed paternal rights.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 05:08 AM
2

That’s not what I’m saying, it’s what the family court is doing. I’m sorry that wasn’t clear to you.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 05:05 AM
2

Yes, that’s what I’m trying to say. We don’t have to get into abortion. We don’t have a horse in the race.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 05:03 AM
5

Yes deadbeats still make payments, and are still called deadbeat dads for not being able to afford the payments. Good for you for making a sentence. Is not being a deadbeat dad as bad as a murdering mom? We never complain about murdering moms who can’t afford to have a child. We think they’re strong and brave to have an abortion because they’re too poor to raise a child. We sure don’t call them murdering moms.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 04:59 AM
8

Same for women.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 04:52 AM
3

Child support is extortion. Fathers will never be respected as long as they are replaceable with a paycheck. If being a mother is really such a burden, then the courts would have handed custody over to the parent who could best provide for the child’s needs. The options you put on the table are to pay for the mother’s decision or face false accusations of rape. That may seem like a strong argument to you, but it’s not. Many men gladly pay child support to have a part of their children’s lives.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 04:51 AM
2

The best we can do is to support men on the issues we face. If women want to support us on this issue, then once our shit isn’t under question anymore we can move on to helping them. Don’t forget, it was men that gave them constitutionally protected abortion rights for 50 years, and women didn’t turn to help men an inch further than where we were in the 1970s. Child support is the least of my worries, it’s just that there is a tangible, measurable loss in that situation. I’m more concerned about…
/r/MensRights07/05/22 04:37 AM
6

If only the POS mom could figure out how to put food on the table for her child. I guess making dollars isn’t equal and you can’t make it equal by forcing men to pay women with their jobs. I guess the question of who should support the child comes down to who’s decision was it to have the living child, and as we’ve been saying, men aren’t allowed to make that decision.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 03:54 AM
5

There’s not much bodily autonomy in jail.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 03:41 AM
3

I hear what you’re saying and I agree. However, abortion has been constitutionally protected in this country for 50 years, didn’t bring men a single step closer to male reproductive rights such as financial abortion. Another user suggested a better term, but I can’t remember it now. Anyway, I’m just saying don’t be duped into believing feminists will turn their attention to men’s issues the moment abortion rights are secured. It didn’t happen, and it won’t happen.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 03:35 AM
2

You make an interesting argument. I think a child’s life is worth much more than 4k per year, so it’s weird that the government would decide that a child’s life is worth 4k and then force a man to pay that to the mom. How much would you say a child is worth? Would you agree more that 4k? Perhaps we could compromise where, a woman is allowed an abortion but has to compensate the father for the value of the child she took from him over the next 18 years? I view child support as a punishment, pregn…
/r/MensRights07/05/22 03:24 AM
7

Sure, maybe another 50 years of constitutionally protected abortion rights and they’ll totally start looking at male reproductive rights. Keep up the high spirits.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 02:44 AM
5

Some dads don’t want to be dads, they pay child support and are called deadbeats. Some moms don’t want to be called moms, they get an abortion and are called women.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 02:20 AM
9

Do they define masculinity as shooting multiple people?
/r/MensRights05/05/22 12:57 AM
1

If I can’t have the procedure that I want, then I give you a procedure you don’t want! What a warped view of equality. A lot of men are pro choice, at least until they see this take.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 06:11 PM
2

When you’re used to privilege, equality looks like oppression.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:05 PM
5

This wouldn’t ban abortion. It would remove the constitutional protection for abortion. It would be up to the democratically elected officials to vote to ban it.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:07 AM
2

The power of fatherhood was given to him by a woman who chose to be with him. It was never about oppression.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 04:37 AM
2

Fair point. I would emphasize that the key, stabilizing factor in both of those social structures is fatherhood. In all situations, motherhood is unquestionable. Only when fatherhood is also unquestioned do we see stable family units that society can build on.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/22 03:03 AM
2

It seems like most people these days can’t tell the difference.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 08:09 PM
98

Patriarchy, aka the desire to be loved by a woman.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 04:55 PM
1

Good to see you recognized you were on the wrong sub. Good luck on your journey.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 04:32 PM
1

Are you familiar with feminism? Proceeds to define feminism as the struggle of women “victims” against men “patriarchy”. Yes, I’m very familiar that brand of feminism. Name a feminist issue that men aren’t the cause and solution of.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 03:37 PM
1

Lol, the only problem men face is toxic femininity that tells women they need a man to support them financially, tells women that men are scum and deserve abuse, tells women that men will protect them no matter what. We will never have equality until we end feminism that tells women they will never be as good as men and women start working as hard as men and earning their own livelihood.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 02:31 PM
134

People don’t seem to realize that humans have been around for 10,000 years. In that time period we have experimented with every possible sexual grouping. It’s not a coincidence that the only societies left standing are patriarchal and monogamous. This is not a conspiracy, it is the only stable social order to build a civilization on. People who think we’ve evolved beyond our basic nature are deluding themselves and putting society at risk. EDIT: should have said civilization as we know it. There…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/22 10:52 PM
1

Even if you agree with the humor, can you agree that an insurance company telling its customers to buy our insurance and people will want to kill you is a really dumb strategy?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 02:07 PM
5

I didn’t want to give them clicks, but someone added the full length YouTube link.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:34 AM
2

I didn’t want to give them clicks, but someone added the full length YouTube link.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:34 AM
27

Where are all the anti domestic violence feminist groups denouncing her for hitting Depp? Shouldn’t they be announcing to the world that it’s never OK to hit your partner, what she did is wrong and unjustified? All I hear is silence, when this is a huge public opportunity to put domestic violence in the spotlight. It really shows you that these groups don’t care about domestic violence, the feminists that run them only care about hurting men by using the legal system as a form of administrative …
/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:41 PM
32

Why do you think of all women as single mothers? Instead of privileged women in a position of privilege in university? The source of your misandry is sexism. Oh, the poor women, you decry as 60% of college positions go to them! The progress was achieved decades ago, and women no longer need special handouts to succeed. The truth is they never did, except in the minds of sexists.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 03:10 PM
8

If it’s 100% her choice to have a kid, why isn’t it 100% her responsibility? What about if she drugs and raped him?
/r/MensRights14/04/22 01:42 PM
12

If the man wants an abortion, but the woman does not, should the man be forced to pay her money for 18 years? We’re arguing the same thing, people deserve autonomy over their life choices. These aren’t different concepts, if one parent can give up responsibility the other one should be able to as well. Even though giving up responsibility looks different to each parent.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 02:56 AM
-11

Focus on the win, not the complaints.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:24 AM
0

Because of Pro Choice policy, every baby born is the choice of the mother. Pro Choice likes to focus on the choice of abortion, but the flip side of that is that every pregnant woman has to choose to have the baby, and the father gets no choice. But the same people say the father is responsible for the woman’s choice.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 02:05 PM
1

it’s compensation for Affirmative Action literally reducing them to race and gender and giving them privilege. She wouldn’t be where she is if she wasn’t a black woman.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 04:47 AM
7

Look at how many women it brings out directing men to their instagram advertising their OnlyFans/ Porn site. Really empowering, ladies. The women set the rules, the men are just playing the game.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 08:32 PM
2

Also, 100% less likely to be chosen by Biden for the Supreme Court.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 10:18 PM
1

A gender studies graduate is not the average college graduate, sir.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 03:46 AM
8

Everybody uses and has access to parks, libraries, roads… Not everyone gets any benefit from a person’s Gender Studies degree, and some would claim it’s causing harm to half the population.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 06:48 PM
2

Since when does taking care of the victims depend on who the perpetrators were?
/r/MensRights13/12/21 02:11 PM
11

Part of the problem is that when women are more likely to do some bad thing, that’s just an everybody thing. If men are more likely to do some bad thing, all men are bad. The empathy gap is real.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 02:08 PM
1

Yes, but women are most affected.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 03:16 PM
20

Men having sex also helps women. Feminists often forget that women enjoy sex when its convenient for them.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 07:34 PM
8

I should add that men didn’t do these things because they’re the best ever. They did them because they were ordered to or often had to do it for others. So, the motivations are all wrong for feminism to ever succeed. Men don’t get a job because they seek financial power, the get a job because they are forced to take care of themselves, because no one sees them for more than what they do and what they provide. Sure some of them become CEOs, but that’s not the majority of them. Feminists see these…
/r/MensRights14/11/21 07:14 PM
21

They look at men and feel nothing but envy. It’s understandable, the greatest institutions were built by men, the primary reason and scientific discoveries were made by men, all historical wars were fought and won by men. They especially feel guilty when they recognize that men go outside and risk their lives every day to protect them and keep them comfortable. Instead of feeling appreciation and gratitude, they want to remove all men, because deep down they know the only way their plumbing is g…
/r/MensRights14/11/21 04:05 PM
7

I don’t think portraying one group as monsters and one group as wonderful is close to the same thing.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 03:24 PM
18

When men misrepresent women on screen, it’s to make them more beautiful. When women misrepresent men on screen it’s to make them more ugly.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 04:27 AM
10

Based on percentages, there is less than one trans person at this high school. Based on it being a high school, they are all teenagers and no one is legally allowed to medically transition to the opposite sex. Based on them being teenagers, they will only use it for straight up heterosexual sex, blow jobs, and sexual harassment. This high school just saved itself millions in lawsuits and prevented countless teenage pregnancies.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 05:57 AM
2

It’s necrophilia.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 02:26 PM
3

If anyone thinks we can end gender based violence, why won’t they bother to end all violence? Why is gender violence between adults worse than mothers who kill their children? If we’re going to end any kind of violence I would vote for violence against children. Women are grown adults who are capable of defending themselves, unless you believe the authors of this bill.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 03:24 AM
12

Euphemisms exist, not to manipulate or trick people, but to show curtesy and respect to others. I don’t ask if I can drop some turds in your toilet, I ask to use your restroom. You know what might happen, I know what will happen, but we’re polite about it and don’t make it crass. Same about asking someone up to have sex in my office. The polite thing do do is call it “coffee”. He even made some actual coffee, which is more than most people would do. She knew what she was doing, but then gets to …
/r/MensRights27/10/21 02:34 AM
27

What the heck do you think “come up for coffee” is? No one can be so dense as to follow a date back to their place and follow him up to his office and then be surprised that he comes on to her. And if she is, then that’s on her for misreading the situation. Clarify and leave, no harm no foul. Otherwise, what you’re really advocating for is the Pence rule, no man and no woman should ever be alone together.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 01:15 AM
9

I wouldn’t be opposed if men got a boys night for every lady’s night. My guess is no.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 10:24 PM
2

I am not a smart woman ( I was speaking for the author , who I assume finds herself to be a smart woman men don’t choose )
/r/MensRights22/10/21 01:02 AM
2

That’s an interesting rebuttal from the feminist. Men say they want smart women ( like me ) but they keep marrying all these stupid women. Real incel vibes there.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 02:52 PM
-5

Her shirt says she’s 17.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 06:17 PM
5

And it’s 100% opposite of every real life experience where the girlfriend immediately accuses the boyfriend of getting her pregnant as soon as her period is a day late.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 05:29 AM
1

Good luck proving he’s the one that caused the pregnancy. Can’t do a paternity test until she’s 2 months pregnant and there’s a lot of potential men that got her pregnant.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 10:11 PM
4

Thought police have been so successful they’ve moved on to the emotion patrol.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 02:31 PM
62

No, they’re saying that women need to stop interrupting.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 03:58 AM
5

Women: birth control options, abortion, safe haven, adoption, marriage, child support Men: just don’t have sex
/r/MensRights30/09/21 09:08 PM
2

The posturing itself is offensive to men and women, though. Imagine some state slaps a woman in the face, and you’re like oh no, that’s not cool. And then your state slaps you in the face and they’re like, yeah, that will teach them. Women have sex, women have babies. Illinois lawmaker: this is all mens’ fault somehow.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 09:06 PM
3

There’s not a single thing in this world a female could experience that would even come close to the indignity of being legally forced to pay your rapist every month for 18 years
/r/MensRights29/09/21 02:26 PM
93

Notice the descriptions of her being inner city, in contrast to the safer college part of the city.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 02:36 PM
230

There’s a 90% chance unsavory was referring to their race.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 01:37 PM
13

I believe feminists have the lowest opinion of women imaginable.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 10:16 PM
14

That means feminists don’t believe women had a sex drive before 1960. Women absolutely fucked and absolutely enjoyed it for thousands of years of human existence. But somehow, all they can think is how unattractive those poor dirt farmers with bad teeth and no modern day hygiene practices are to them, so therefore no woman ever could have been attracted to a man without a BMW. They assume humanity only survived because these brutes trapped and raped all these women, forcing them to have babies a…
/r/MensRights24/09/21 10:05 PM
3

Top civil servant says he only wants his staff to go into the office 2 days a week so the men don’t have to deal with women’s nagging and the women can stay home and use their Peloton bikes.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 07:44 PM
5

Are you just here for the attention? Come back with that argument when women’s shelters have only 10% more funding than men’s shelters. Because right now there’s a 100% difference funding women’s shelters at the expense of men. I hope to see you on our side, fighting for some equality one day.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 02:40 PM
4

No. You said that that the woman felt more threatened, I offered a solution for women. You came back with a counter offer of, wouldn’t it be better if we just changed every other person around the woman instead? Let’s make men be more emotional, let’s stop men from being the sole breadwinner, let’s teach men emotional guidance, and then maybe she won’t feel threatened anymore. Do you see why when you come here with your feminist bullshit to start arguments you get resistance? Men’s rights is pro…
/r/MensRights23/09/21 02:34 PM
5

Why do we need to allocate resources based a 10% difference on the gender of the victim? You’ve taken a universal problem that everyone wants to solve, and turned it into a zero sum game where the resources can only be used for a male victim or a female victim. If the resources are universal, then naturally 10% more women will utilize the resources. The feminist narrative is that we need to protect women at the expense of men. Why can’t we do both by not gendering IPV?
/r/MensRights23/09/21 02:23 PM
3

If women are way more likely to feel threatened then we should mandate self defense courses that include avoiding threatening situations for women. That will teach them how to protect themselves when threatened.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 02:13 PM
6

The problem is that all feminist thought starts with the false assumption that all women are eternal victims who can’t take care of themselves. The hatred just manifests from that. Every problem that they perceive needs to be solved by men or the government. If there aren’t enough female entrepreneurs, they aren’t going to tell women to go out and start more business, they’re going to blame male dominated VCs to find more female startups. They’re going to ask the government to give special contr…
/r/MensRights23/09/21 02:08 PM
5

Oh, but there was no law specifically against it. Just like for women.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 01:25 PM
5

Feminists: Why not both?
/r/MensRights22/09/21 03:39 PM
12

Men are 80% of homicides, so society has a violence against men problem. It was legal to beat your wife until “?year?”, but there is still no law against beating your husband, so society has a violence against men problem. While 40% of female homicide victims are killed by an intimate partner, 30% of male homicide victims are killed by a stranger, so society murders 3x more men they don’t even know than their intimate female partners. The murder rate for women is about 3/100000, or 0.003%, so th…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 03:21 PM
8

I’m glad gender doesn’t prevent your empathy. Everyone is jumping on this guy, even though he’s clearly the victim in this instance without even knowing it. What got me was when he asked if he could go to jail instead of the perpetrator. My guess is that this incident sent her anxiety through the roof, having charges on her record because of this, and that she ended up doing something very dangerous to herself, or an accident occurred unrelated to him. Every indication from that video was that h…
/r/MensRights17/09/21 05:55 PM
8

I just watched most of it, and then the New York post 5 minute cut that makes her look like the victim, doesn’t show her as being charged. What was with the question, when you hit him were you attempting to cause him harm? No, I was trying to get him to stop saying calm down. Is that an excuse for hitting someone? No officer, I wasn’t trying to knock her out, I was trying to get her to shut up and that seems to work. If you hit someone you are intentionally trying to accomplish whatever goal in …
/r/MensRights17/09/21 04:36 PM
26

I don’t know what the outcome will be, but I do think it’s sad that the internet, and local protesters are docking and protesting outside his home, assuming his guilt without question. The article I read about it, mentions the domestic disturbance police call, no mention that she was the aggressor in the call. It will be interesting to read when the details come out, it could end in so many ways. Edit: since this comment probably won’t age well given recent updates, my point still stands. There …
/r/MensRights17/09/21 03:35 PM
4

I don’t know why, I’m just saying if you need welfare to take care of your child, get it from the government not someone you had sex with.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 02:28 AM
5

Or apply for government assistance and make it work like everyone else does. Rich married parents aren’t obligated to spend money on their children they don’t want to, why are divorced parents? It’s like the courts punish kids whose parents stay married.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 02:20 AM
46

How about the life expectancy of women vs the murder rate for men? Just more guys taking all the good stuff? Envy is real.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 01:57 PM
2

Interesting that it’s the money these people are focused on, instead of putting the rapist in jail, and his not being able to profit off of his crime. I guess their not concerned about women getting raped as long as they have access to abortion.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 12:46 PM
3

Let me get this straight. You think that men, who secretly spend their nights beating off with their bare hands took away your abortion rights, and your plan is to withhold sex from them? Good luck.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 04:43 AM
40

“Not Texan, no opinion”
/r/MensRights07/09/21 03:17 AM
2

I was curious about your usage of the word in relationship to my comment. I’ll assume it was serious in the context of this subreddit, there’s a lot of others outside that do want women treated differently under the law, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 09:00 PM
3

You’ll have to explain your comment further. Are you in favor of treating women differently because of their natural differences, or are you against treating women differently because any natural differences? I can’t tell if you’re making a sarcastic comment or you truly want an equal application of the law.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 08:46 PM
15

I disagree, the law doesn’t take away men’s rights that they never had. If anything, it brings women closer to equality with men. And perhaps it will open a conversation with our legal system that only views children as a burden.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 03:48 PM
25

Because some men rise to power, we can forget about the struggle of all other men. -feminist logic
/r/MensRights01/09/21 07:36 PM
5

Then yes, I think men should be treated the same as women.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 02:46 PM
8

Men will never be able to opt out of fatherhood until there is an acceptance that men can be compelled or tricked into non consensual unprotected sex. The argument for female abortion is that she was forced to become pregnant against her will. Society doesn’t believe that men can be victims, they can only be perpetrators of sex. Women can consent or not to sex, for the man, the act of sex is viewed as his consent.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 02:36 PM
2

Oh, I think it’s quite palatable for feminists. I imagine they’re having quite a few good chuckles about it while they drink gin out of their male tears mugs.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 10:10 PM
16

An important point here is that we don’t murder someone no matter how vile we think they are. That somehow got lost in the identity politics of the last 20 years. Of course dehumanization is a natural consequence.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 02:50 PM
5

What does it mean?
/r/MensRights24/08/21 07:10 PM
3

Seriously, MRAs don’t have enough power to start excluding people with respect for the cause.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 12:14 PM
9

There are also straight MRAs not attracted to femininity the OP has never heard of, AKA women.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 12:12 PM
3

I’ve commented more than 5 times and haven’t shot anybody. Where’s the articles about me?
/r/MensRights22/08/21 04:56 AM
3

So when a person believes they are the victim of sexism, they are actually displaying sexism against the opposite gender? Yes, but only for men. Isn’t that conclusion based in sexism? Yes, but only for men.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 09:44 PM
5

All children suffer due to their parents. How is it fair to the children if the parent loses a job, or dies? Shit happens to parents, like divorce, and kids suffer.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 09:21 PM
65

Feminists have already separated sexual activity from the parent making decision. A woman can have sex, and then within 3 months decide if she does or does not want to be a parent, regardless of her decisions to engage in sexual relations. But for a man, the decision to have sex is equivalent to becoming a parent. But even knowing that and engaging in sex, his choice is not considered in the decision to become a parent or not, which is entirely in the hands of the mother.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 11:33 PM
25

Liberals and conservatives at least agree on one thing. Screw men.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 10:38 PM
5

Since that goes to them as income, critics will complain this increases the pay gap /s
/r/MensRights25/07/21 03:51 PM
3

Exactly, why should someone be financially punished for leaving an abusive relationship? Too many men can’t leave their abusive spouses because it would cost them too much, and their abusers know this.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 11:23 PM
212

We only see see the news about rich white Ivy League men being falsely accused, which only encourages feminist misandry. The truth is they’re the only one that have the resources to fight back. Far more (black) men are simply unnoticeable victims.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:15 PM
0

Sir, I’m quite confident you have no idea what you’re talking about.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 03:53 AM
1

That’s true, and also perhaps why we haven’t outlawed being an asshole.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 07:56 PM
11

I believe from the context of this post, that it is already clearly socially unacceptable. What feminists don’t want to admit, is that catcalling works. Perhaps not on feminists, but enough women will stop to talk to an attractive guy that calls out to them on the street. What they ultimately find offensive is that men only catcall women they find attractive. Otherwise, why aren’t they addressing homeless men that ask for change? Those men are equally annoying, but they are equal opportunity ann…
/r/MensRights22/07/21 12:09 AM
27

Freedom of speech will always be more important than freedom from offense.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 09:01 PM
10

And yet a woman has never apologized to me for taking up space or standing up for her human rights. It seems like they’re assuming all women are timid door mats. Way to go UN Women. They live in a sexist world of their own making because if they didn’t they wouldn’t need to exist.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 07:40 PM
5

If only he had paid more in child support she could have done better, the deadbeat /s
/r/MensRights12/07/21 04:02 AM
5

Vigilantism can’t be tolerated in a law and order society. If it’s true, prove it in a court of law and have him put away. Sexual abuse is not a death sentence crime, but murder is.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 05:46 PM
6

In that case, you would need to include how many men they rejected before getting murdered. Assuming each woman rejects five dates would better show how many men are rejected before a woman is murdered, reducing the stats by a factor of 5. But let’s not pretend that all men are the same. Do the victims have multiple abusive men in their dating pool? Are the perpetrators met online or out at bars? Are they men with criminal records? Are they more likely from a certain geographic region of the cou…
/r/MensRights10/07/21 07:03 PM
7

That interpretation doesn’t take into account that everything is about this reporter. Clearly Morgan was referring to being there to see this sow plowed by her future baby daddy, rather than the comment Caine had just made. Why didn’t someone stop to explain the context to this lady before letting her on air? I would have liked to been there to see Michael Cain congratulate a fat woman for being pregnant, I’m sure it would have been the classiest of unintended insults.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 06:06 PM
47

My husband never does anything right to my husband never does anything only takes a few years of berating.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 04:08 PM
1

If no one asked you to do it, don’t expect to get paid. If you’re not being compensated for something you don’t want to do, stop doing it. If your life goes to shit because of choices you’ve made, stop blaming other people.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 07:17 PM
7

Women like BDSM porn. Feminists only focus on men who like it and disregard the women.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 12:31 PM
0

I was referring to Chad as someone who sleeps around, not their hotness. If anything, I’m saying women should raise their standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/21 12:11 AM
-2

Also, what percentage were pieces of shit with kids from another woman before the mom slept with them? In other words, her choice. You can’t turn Chad into a Dad.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 03:27 PM
10

That’s not treating her like a wife, that’s treating her like his daughter. Regardless, she is the one who refused the marriage contract ( probably to maintain her alimony from a previous ex ) and she is now claiming that she wants the protections of the contract which she refused to sign. If she had signed the contract, it would have just been another divorce rape as usual. I could even come to terms with the feminized state making him pay for those protections if he were the one that refused t…
/r/MensRights05/06/21 03:37 PM
1

This is getting more common with girls who think they’re getting ghosted. The fact that she went from 0-rape overnight is a little concerning about her mental / emotional state. Remember, her consent is based on you being there for her afterwords. Your leaving afterwords and not texting back immediately triggered her revoke consent defense so people won’t think she’s a slut, they’ll think you’re a rapist. REMEMBER your post nut game is just as important as pre nut to avoid these situations. Some…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/21 02:43 PM
10

Let’s build our own gym. With black jack, and hookers.
/r/MensRights28/05/21 05:11 PM
22

Few women like to acknowledge they are protected by a thin layer of courteous men.
/r/MensRights28/05/21 05:05 PM
9

This is how the world is, there are two leagues for everything; the competitive league and the women’s league. Women are allowed in the competitive league, but since they never win against men they wanted their own leagues without men where they can feel like winners too.
/r/MensRights28/05/21 04:55 PM
1

Women were allowed to work long before alimony existed. It’s just that they weren’t accustomed to working as hard as a man to support a household on their own.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 04:47 AM
10

Well, culture is not made up of some people that tell rape jokes and Donald Trump, for one. A central tenant of our justice system is innocent until proven guilty, so yes, all accusations are assumed false until proven true, not just for rape, but for murder, and every crime, for two. Circumcision is not rape, for three. The only way rape culture exists is to bend the definition of rape to mean anything that makes people uncomfortable in a sexual way. That is not the definition our society uses.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 02:45 PM
2

A) it doesn’t matter if you’re just looking to bang. 2) it doesn’t matter if you’re looking for a relationship because there will be so many other red flag behaviors to base your decision on if you just read the sidebar.
/r/askTRP27/04/21 04:50 AM
2

I always give my prostitute a $20 tip because I charge her $20 to have sex with me. It’s not illegal if we’re both selling sex.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 03:37 AM
3

Poor Alpha Chad doesn’t get whatever he wants. He just wants a sweet girl who will support him in his dream to become a mid level accountant but all he finds are chicks that just want to drink and fuck. Don’t buy into this view that Chad just wants to pump and dump. Chad has far more important things on his mind that he is applying the lessons of TRP to accomplish. It just so happens that women are into men that can accomplish things so getting laid is just a cherry on top. Don’t disgrace Chad l…
/r/TheRedPill12/04/21 04:25 AM
18

“Feminists that are not sexist?” The name of their movement expresses their desire to place women’s problems above men’s based on the gender of the victims. That is sexism.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 07:53 PM
4

In Real Life version of “Thanos was right.” I imagine she thought he was the good guy and was surprised when he lost to the girl power Avengers.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 03:28 PM
2

Yes, even though it’s harder, there are a lot of people who are qualified to do game development because a lot of people want to do game development. It’s not that so many people prefer to do it, it’s that so many prefer to do it enough to become qualified to do it. It’s still the number qualified not the number who prefer it.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 04:01 AM
3

That’s cool. My point is qualifications are based on what they can do, like lifting requirements. Not things like gender or height. I guess there could be a height requirement for a job, it’s not a protected class, but I’ve never seen it.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 03:56 AM
2

I’m just trying to reiterate the article’s points, not my own.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 11:26 PM
12

You’re thinking in terms of men and women when it’s all about sitting in front of a cash register or lifting heavy boxes. If women aren’t able or willing to do it, the supply and demand says the smaller supply of men who can get paid more. The fact is men will do anything for money. So there is no woman’s job that men wouldn’t also do if the pay was decent. That means there’s always a supply of labor for “women’s work”, keeping the wages in those fields down. If women choose not do work in certa…
/r/MensRights01/04/21 02:28 PM
12

You seem to misunderstand capitalism. Pay isn’t determined by how many people prefer to do the job, and it’s not based on how much the job sucks. It’s based on the requirements of the job and how many people are capable of doing the job. Warehouse work can’t be done as effectively by short people, weak people, obese people. Cashier work can. So the company has to convince that smaller population of people to work in the back. They do that with perks, like being able to listen to music and not de…
/r/MensRights01/04/21 02:19 PM
3

Please don’t measure yourself by the number of notches in you bedpost. That is the side effect of TRP, not the goal. You can get a jacked body in 6 months to a year, and still be passed up by girls. You can get stacks of cash and still be passed up by girls. What you need to work on is your ambition, motivation, and confidence. Having a successful high paying career is something that can take 10-20 years to attain. You need to start working on that yesterday. If your motivation is to get laid, t…
/r/askTRP01/04/21 01:40 PM
9

So hard to make a point in today’s polite society. Gathering is just as hard as hunting. Even so, women could also be hunters. Even so, who brings the meat may not be related to social power. It reads as a personal issue of projection more than a scientific examination. We found a female skeleton with hunting instruments, patriarchy is over because it never really existed because women also killed animals!
/r/MensRights01/04/21 04:59 AM
5

I’m going to go out on a limb and try to answer the question despite the obvious points brought up by others here. My suggestion would be to bring up your needs and your desires over your fears and his actions. Making the conversation about his actions and what he is allowed to do makes it controlling and more of an ultimatum. Making it about your fear of losing him makes you sound like a needy bag of uncontrolled emotions. So instead make it about your needs and desires. You desire to be his on…
/r/RedPillWomen31/03/21 11:28 PM
12

Adding to the apex fallacy is the survivors fallacy. CEOs aren’t necessarily the best, but they are the survivors of decades or work. 100s of men’s and women were competing to get to that position. They either gave up, moved on, or stayed in place. The CEO is the lone survivor of all those people fighting to the top. It’s not because he was smarter, or worked harder, or is a man, but that he survived his way to the top. Feminists would like you to believe that it just takes hard work to get to t…
/r/MensRights27/03/21 07:29 PM
1

TRP: here’s how men can improve themselves to be attractive to women. FDS: here’s how men are disgusting creeps. Which one is quarantined?
/r/MensRights26/03/21 01:27 PM
4

notallwomen murder, but even if there’s just one female murderer shouldn’t we protect our lives from women? There are far more men involved with arresting, prosecuting, convicting, and jailing rapists than there are rapists, but you know, let’s paint an entire gender based on the worst examples we can find.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 04:09 AM
4

I just watched Coming 2 America. Turns out the prince was drugged and raped in Queens and now has a new heir to the thrown 30 years later. Yes, all of the sympathy was reserved for his oldest daughter who would no longer get to be Queen. It’s called the casual male rape catch 22. You see, if a man is upset about having sex with a woman who is unattractive, or has a terrible personality, then it is he who is sexist against her inner beauty and who therefore deserves to be raped. And if he liked i…
/r/MensRights07/03/21 04:55 PM
-2

Whoa there buddy, I said nothing about value or human dignity in my post. I said contribute nothing, if you value people based on what they contribute that’s on you. And if you think doing a job that 1,000 other people can do, or paying taxes that 1,000 other people can pay means society owes them some debt, then you’re not valuing what society already provides them, infrastructure, protection, order. What materials they produce are insignificant compared to this intangible benefits they take fr…
/r/MensRights07/03/21 04:29 PM
1

A farmer doesn’t water the tree that bears no fruit. Why should the government take care of single people that contribute nothing to the future of the society? They choose to take care of no one but themselves, then no one will choose to take care of them. It’s not like they can’t get married and receive these benefits, they just don’t understand why they should have to do something they don’t want to receive something they do want.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 03:43 PM
3

I thought this was interesting too. They didn’t ask respondents if they were victims, in which women have reasons to claim victim hood more than men. They asked if they were abusive, in which case men have more reasons to claim they are not. Not making judgements either way, just think it’s weird how women can claim heck yeah we’re victims and heck yeah we’re abusers with no cognitive dissidence.
/r/MensRights02/03/21 04:14 AM
20

It’s probably just a coincidence, but in 150 years of American history, when men voted and were drafted, elected officials declared war 5 times. In 25 years after women voted and weren’t drafted, they declared war 6 times. And after that they stopped counting it.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 08:35 PM
2

Plot twist: OP is lesbian who has sexually harassed or assaulted every woman she knows. Every. Single. One.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 05:55 AM
21

They’re going to hit the wall so hard they will bounce. 20-30s party. 30-40s marry a simp and put out a couple of kids. 40-50s divorce and party off alimony/child support. 50-60s re-marry. 60-70s second divorce so they can retire in peace and show the world they can still party. 70-80s, wonder why their kids never call anymore.
/r/askTRP06/02/21 04:36 AM
6

No one ever factors in the alimony gap. Income that feminism just ignores.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 05:44 AM
3

When women have no agency, everything is a man’s fault. How do they think this will lead to anything other than more women being “exploited” by gangs? As though these women didn’t choose their predicaments based on the best options available to them, just like the men who choose crime.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 05:18 AM
5

We know for a fact it’s not a joke because feminists have no sense of humor.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 06:23 PM
2

Obviously, they are not doing a good job of following their own rules. Hence the fine.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:45 AM
14

Just imagine what would happen to our child support laws if female rape was recognized. Women don’t rape men by force, they rape men through coercion, and our court system rewards them with 18 years of child support from their victims. How would our legal system reconcile the punishment it routinely dishes out to male victims of rape?
/r/MensRights28/11/20 07:51 PM
55

Having a job is a privilege for men and a human right for women. /s I’m just trying to understand how these people think. It seems like they believe men are just handed jobs and only women have to work for a job, so equality to them means men handing women jobs. But that’s not what men experience. They’re asking for their own fantasy and calling it equality. Their concept of the male experience isn’t based on any reality, and then they demand it for themselves.
/r/MensRights30/10/20 02:10 PM
4

Wait until she sees what happens during divorce when you pay for your spouse for 10 years.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 10:19 PM
2

When you only attract girls with daddy issues, you might be your problem. If he thinks men are trash, he should look in the mirror.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 10:08 PM
3

There seems to be a couple of issues he is struggling with. One is the fluids and the other is the expectations. Perhaps you can subtly keep him in the loop on your cycle by hanging a tracking calendar that outlines some off limits days, this can be an estimate but it gives him an idea of when he feels safe to engage in sex. On expectations, you should probably have a discussion and try to get on the same page. Make sure he knows you want to have sex with him, not just have sex. Talk about what …
/r/RedPillWomen11/09/20 01:27 PM
5

Great points, but men aren’t walking away. 70% are being pushed out of the family by the same single mom looking for society’s sympathy and welfare. There’s rarely a clear cut good guy and bad guy in a divorce, but the courts don’t care about that anyway when they tell the dad his parenting time is no longer needed, just don’t be late with the checks.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/20 04:19 AM
4

It doesn’t matter if a woman rapes a man and is then charged with rape. All she has to do is say she had alcohol that night and therefore he is guilty of raping her.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 11:48 PM
4

“Some men suck at picking partners yes. But does that mean he deserves to be stabbed to death?” LOL I’m not blaming her for his alleged violence. I’m blaming her for stabbing her husband to death. If you want to say a history of abuse is rationale for murder, fine, but don’t call it self defense. When you get in a fight and kill someone it’s not self defense. Notice how she didn’t say “He attacked me and I struggled for my life”, she said “I was afraid he would attack me so I preemptively stabbe…
/r/MensRights07/08/20 03:44 PM
1

Focus on your mission, if you have one, not how she satisfies you. She will either get on board or leave you, problem solved. If you do leave her, she will be in your life asking for money, and the courts will give it to her, for the next 18 years. That’s longer than your marriage. By leaving, you give her more power than by staying. I suggest using this RP wealth of knowledge to game your wife, and become the man she wants to satisfy. That’s the best chance you have.
/r/askTRP07/08/20 01:48 PM
14

“Social entrapment”? Is that what the courts are calling marriage these days?
/r/MensRights07/08/20 01:42 PM
19

But if she called the cops 16/80 times, doesn’t that imply that someone called the cops on her 64/80 times? She has a history of multiple violent partners. What does that say about the common denominator and her character? Perhaps she finds all the abusive men accidentally, or perhaps she is abusive enough to create them.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 01:36 PM
11

Interesting. Society wants men’s productivity. Society wants women’s sexuality. Both are shamed in various ways by society for not meeting those expectations. That also leads to certain market forces: Men encourage promiscuity because it reduces the value of female sexuality. Women encourage socialism because it decreases the value of male productivity.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/20 03:36 PM
37

Feminist Platform: End due process for the accused. MRA Platform: End discrimination based on sex. Feminists think differences in outcomes is sexual discrimination. MRAs think discrimination based on sex is sexual discrimination. They cannot end sexual discrimination with sexual discrimination. The battles we must fight illuminate the existing power imbalance. Which side are you on?
/r/MensRights06/07/20 02:08 PM
1

But what if those same sex parents are men??
/r/MensRights22/06/20 01:56 PM
9

SJWs have defined “success” as whatever the white male has and is doing. It’s a philosophy based in envy, rather than celebrating the success of women and minorities, they envy the narrow success of white men. They will never be satisfied with their own success in life if there is a white man who is successful at something else. Women are successful nurses? That’s not good enough, they need to be doctors and surgeons like those white men. They make more money so that must be better. Never mind t…
/r/MensRights17/06/20 03:01 AM
7

They matter way less than you think. If getting laid is what matters most to you, take the money you save on steroids and hire call girls. Guys with muscle get played, get used, get dumped. It’s not the panacea to your girl problems that you think it is. You’re young enough to start focusing on your long term future, not risking it for some short term gains.
/r/askTRP09/06/20 02:04 PM
1

Is the double standard that men are invisible and ignored while women are noticed and given attention?
/r/MensRights30/04/20 02:53 AM
3

There are two kinds of feminists. Those that are sexist against men, who think all men are oppressors, and those who are sexist against women, who think all women are victims.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 03:54 AM
5

I’d love to see that go down on that sub. “My boyfriend forced me to lick his asshole. Is this rape?” “No, he was more violated than you do, and besides you probably enjoyed it anyway.”
/r/MensRights30/03/20 03:58 PM
17

Although the physical acts are different, the crime is the same. So it’s a difference without meaning. The crime forcing someone to perform sexual acts against their will. The law shouldn’t distinguish between what those sexual acts are, and it certainly shouldn’t take sides as to which acts are worse than others. It’s a crass example, but if someone claims that being penetrated is worse than being forced to penetrate, ask her if she would rather have someone’s tongue stuck in her butt, or be fo…
/r/MensRights30/03/20 03:28 PM
25

She abuses Johnny Depp, can’t hold on to Elon Musk, and now she’s a lesbian with a dog. Karma’s a bitch and it’s not done with her yet. Listening to her side of the story with the bathroom door and then punching Depp sounds to be false. She says she was trying to escape his abuse by fleeing to another room. That she was closing the door on him trying to keep him out. But in the audio, she kicked the door open hitting him in the head. And since doors swing into the room, that would mean Depp was …
/r/MensRights28/03/20 03:35 PM
10

What also bothers me about her post, is that she seems to believe that the judges are deciding based on their subjective white settler preferences, rather than acknowledging that music at that level is a craft with elements of composition that can be objectively rated. It really diminishes art to a popularity contest.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 01:30 PM
28

Remember the push for “color blindness” years ago? Well, it turns out it didn’t give them the results they wanted. So we’re back to affirmative action. One comment was interesting, “I don’t want the job just because I’m a woman, but some kind of affirmative action is needed.” Lady, if you don’t want the job just because you’re a woman, what makes you think someone else wants the job just because she’s a woman? A lot of people hold positions that they themselves don’t agree with, because they thi…
/r/MensRights13/03/20 01:23 PM
1

“I hope he treats you well, goodbye” No contact and extricate your lives.
/r/askTRP29/02/20 03:34 PM
0

Breaking up with her 5 years ago would have changed shit.
/r/askTRP29/02/20 03:32 PM
26

Men just call it marrying for love, though.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 09:16 PM
12

“Men propose 100% of marriages, women propose 80% of divorces.” That woman wants a ring from him, what’s she doing to earn it? Taking him on TV to attack him doesn’t seem like a winning strategy.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 03:20 PM
3

Two people playing hide and seek? Here, let me zip you into this suitcase and then I’ll go count to 10. Sneak 1000.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 02:58 PM
4

Light sentences for false allegations have increased the occurrences of false allegations more than they have convinced the guilty to step forward after the innocent spends 4 years in prison.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 01:55 AM
3

People turn themselves in all the time, except we don’t discuss giving them a lighter sentence unless it’s a woman who admits to ruining a man’s life. There is no deterrent to falsely accusing someone because there is no significant punishment for doing so. Instead, we reduce the protection of the accused specifically in cases of sexual assault allegations. You would rather incentivize coming forward after a man’s life is ruined, instead of discouraging the false allegation that ruins the man’s …
/r/MensRights26/02/20 01:47 AM
2

No, your logic is not sound! Sentencing is a preventative measure, to prevent others from doing the same thing. I have never heard someone say, we need lighter sentences on murderers so more people will admit when they did it. If a person is thinking about abusing the law to ruin another person’s life, we want them to consider that they may have the book thrown at them if they are caught. Our society is weaponizing our legal system for their own benefit, and that needs to be taken extremely seri…
/r/MensRights26/02/20 01:31 AM
4

Think about all the prejudgemental bitches there are out there so self assured that men are trash that they never actually interact with one. They might go their whole lives never considering that they are wrong. At least this woman was given that opportunity.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 09:42 PM
25

I’m left with the feeling that the author wants feminists in LGBTQ relationships, for “equality”. The truth is she doesn’t even recognize equality in romantic partnerships. She recognizes that men paying for stuff as an expectation of women, but she doesn’t recognize women doing stuff is an expectation of men. How do you call it “unpaid labor” in the same article stating men are paying for more things? If the man pays the $4,000 mortgage, then that means he’s in an equal relationship and paying …
/r/MensRights17/02/20 02:56 PM
30

If they don’t want a singles bar they will have to also exclude lesbian women. Otherwise women might still be being checked out and hit on.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 02:26 PM
5

Keep it simple. "Men are 90% of workplace deaths, so the right not to die at work would be a good start."
/r/MensRights13/02/20 07:43 PM
2

We all get there the same way, one clumsy fuck-up at a time. Don’t be so hard on yourself, you can learn something that makes you better every mistake.
/r/askTRP06/01/20 05:46 AM
11

Exactly, mate guarding is just disrespecting yourself. Watch your girl, if she doesn’t give the other guy attention, ignores it and moves on, then you should too. If she doesn’t do that, then you have a choice of getting in some guy’s face or dropping her. Either way, it’s not the guy disrespecting you that should concern you, it’s your girl’s respect.
/r/askTRP04/01/20 09:10 PM
9

It sounds like her issues are with the sorority girls, not the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 03:49 AM
3

Sim City doesn’t have a two party system. Republicans can sell lowering taxes, but not lowering social welfare. Democrats can sell increasing social welfare, but not increasing taxes.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/19 11:28 PM
2

What was the lie? He said they would die, not when or why. That was true.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/19 04:49 PM
1

Let’s assume your husband is a good and reasonable person. While it seems like an over reaction to leaving the stock out, let’s understand that he is reacting with the history and baggage that’s built up over the relationship. It’s not about the stock. It appears that your forgetfulness is building resentment and frustration with him. We can’t control his frustration, but we can work on the cause of that frustration. People are forgetful, that’s OK, you’re OK. But when there are negative consequ…
/r/RedPillWomen01/12/19 12:52 AM
31

And neither of them are sexual assault, hence the comparison.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 04:52 PM
129

Hell, that’s mundane for a male caught urinating in public. Breastfeeding is natural, but urinating is not? (Urinating in public is not OK, but it’s not a sexual offense anymore than public breastfeeding.)
/r/MensRights25/11/19 03:09 PM
4

They had 7 years to prepare to work for an extra two years? And they couldn’t do it?
/r/MensRights24/11/19 10:57 PM
25

It’s not always the man who makes her quit. Sometimes the mother wants to quit her soul crushing low paying hard working job to stay home with her babies. Did it ever occur to you the woman might want to quit while the man would prefer her financial contribution?
/r/MensRights04/11/19 05:52 AM
57

2/3 of open relationships proposed by women. 2/3 of divorces proposed by women. I don’t think this is a coincidence. Divorce is just an open relationship where she gets your money and sleeps with other guys. Listen to the blue pill site owner try to defend women’s behavior. He thinks they’re trying to save their relationships by allowing their boyfriends to sleep around, while the facts are quite obvious that she wants to cheat. Remember, women are the gatekeepers of sex, if he’s not having sex …
/r/TheRedPill26/10/19 04:00 PM
8

I don’t think that is what this community promoting. Respect, Submission, Appreciation, Empathy, don’t necessarily end in fetishized slavery.
/r/RedPillWomen19/10/19 04:01 PM
2

Do you like putting yourself in situational date rape? Good luck with your he said-she said defense. I’m sure someone on the jury might believe your side of the story that nothing happened, and god forbid if something does happen. It doesn’t even matter if it’s consensual at that point, she drunk you sober = rape accusation, if not from her then her friends.
/r/askTRP18/10/19 07:12 PM
13

It sounds like the author has made the mental connection that advising a woman to have sex with her sexual partner is tantamount to him raping her. Here’s an idea, if you don’t enjoy sex, don’t force another person into a sexually monogamous relationship with you.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 02:13 PM
14

Forcing a woman to become a mother is a difficult decision. Do you know what they tell men who are forced to become fathers? “You shouldn’t have had sex.” There is a sympathy gap between men and women in our society. What is easy for us to tell men to do, we cringe at having to tell a woman to do.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 01:16 PM
1

Have sex with someone you’re not attracted to. It really changes your perspective.
/r/askTRP11/10/19 05:01 AM
2

Always remember, it doesn’t even matter if she actually lied. If your gut is telling you something doesn’t feel right, it’s time to end the relationship and move on. Some guys will try to rationalize that all her good points make up for that feeling in their stomach. It doesn’t, and being alone is not as bad as being destroyed by some crazy person.
/r/askTRP11/10/19 04:59 AM
1

Stop trying to assign rational thought to her emotional actions. She wanted something different, that doesn’t mean it’s better. Don’t assign value to yourself or other men based on female sexual selection. She was never yours, it was just your turn. Lots of girls have daddy issues. Your salary and lifting aren’t going to solve them for her.
/r/askTRP07/10/19 01:01 PM
9

It means her “career” is funded by the last guy that fucked her. You don’t want to be the next guy.
/r/askTRP24/09/19 01:08 PM
8

Only false allegations ruin lives. True allegations seek justice. The fact that she doesn’t see the difference is the problem.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 04:18 AM
3

You’re reading from the old rule books. You see, it used to be that women negotiated a committed relationship in exchange for a life of sexual fidelity. Men had a choice of raping her or marrying her. Since rape culture had been invented yet, men did the decent thing and accepted the deal. Then in the 1960’s women became hyper competitive, no longer satisfied with commitment, they wanted the best. Once they started competing for the “best”, instead of commitment, they rewrote the rules. These ne…
/r/askTRP23/09/19 04:06 AM
3

Why don’t they just make both characters fictional and just call it a fiction movie then?
/r/MensRights21/09/19 06:49 PM
1

Or the welfare state will start excluding men. Like they already do.
/r/MensRights20/09/19 09:36 PM
1

That same crazy performance we all call polite society. Burn it all down.
/r/MensRights20/09/19 01:57 PM
3

Child support is still enforced in 50/50 custody arrangements. Ask me how I know.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 02:19 PM
8

That’s right, it’s not like it’s the Men’s NBA where there’s some patriarchal law forbidding women from participating. Only women use that sexist tactic.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 04:40 PM
14

So the true victims of homelessness are the women who he can’t give a home to?
/r/MensRights07/09/19 03:48 PM
2

And false sexual harassment charges are even more common, and just as likely to get you fired without a trial. Even with video surveillance, HR will believe her when she says you made inappropriate comments about her breasts.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 01:57 AM
1

It’s actually a movie about a woman scamming men.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 03:03 AM
4

We can’t have an open and honest conversation about the issue if discussion destroys livelihoods.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 08:37 PM
1

You have it backwards, they force the rapist to marry the victim. Which is some fucked up irony justice because then she can divorce rape him.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/19 02:24 PM
5

Let’s not forget, sports aren’t men only, women are allowed on men’s teams they just can’t compete at that level. So they created women only sports, where men aren’t allowed. Feminism is a separatist movement.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 12:21 PM
8

That brings up an interesting point. We have admissions programs that seem to be focused on equality of outcomes, not equality of opportunity. Did you find something like 80% of female applicants were accepted while only 20% of male applicants were accepted? It would seem that, if you want your population to reflect your applicant pool, you would except the top 30% each of males and females. Of course, this would lead to two different leagues, just like the NBA and the WNBA, where the genders on…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 07:57 PM
4

I’m struggling to think of a situation where the government disadvantages women over men. For some reason they’re pushing this as a women’s right issue, but I think it’s more likely going to lead to lawsuits challenging the male only draft, higher sentencing for men over women for the same crimes, men receiving less child custody, men ordered to pay more alimony, the deluth model of domestic violence, reproductive rights for men, the definition of rape acknowledging when men are forced to have s…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 07:36 PM
9

Ironic, a movement founded on “Men and women are equal,” is obsessed with how men and women are different.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 01:18 AM
15

That’s funny because if you treat women nice they think you want to rape them.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 02:45 PM
6

When your assumptions are built on faulty premises your conclusions have no effect. That’s the state of feminism today. Problem: Women don’t bike as much as men. (Why is this a problem?) Premise: Women don’t bike because it’s too dangerous. Assumption: Women will bike if it’s safer. Conclusion: Let’s make it safer to get more women to bike. When that doesn’t work, it must be the patriarchy!
/r/MensRights16/08/19 02:15 PM
22

How can there be a wrong reason for asking consent? The truth is women want men to ask for consent, but they do not want affirmative consent to be interpreted as protection against later accusations of sexual assault. Yes Means Yes was founded on the basis that a yes could be coerced and therefore could not be used as a defense against false accusations. No Means No always means no, but it puts the burden of communication on the woman regardless of if he asks.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/19 12:22 AM
55

I’m sure it’s the video games, and not the single mom who babysits her son by sticking him in front of video games while she hunts for a new dad. Surely, video games. Men are abandoned, and anything they use to comfort themselves is vilified, rather than society’s total lack of regard.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 10:49 AM
14

No, rapists should go to jail and not be given any contact with the child, or even be aware if the rape lead to a child. I’m not sure what you mean by willing fathers, but unwilling fathers should not be forced to support the result of a sexual encounter, just like women should not be forced to support the result of a sexual encounter.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:12 PM
51

Nothing works with them. Women: We need society to be more accepting and welcoming to breastfeeding women. Men: Absolutely, we totally accept breastfeeding in public. Women: Actually, your acceptance is making women feel uncomfortable, perverts.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 12:36 AM
34

“Literally everyone [I’m interested in] only wants sex” Guess how you should behave if you want her to be interested in you? These women are giving away their playbook and don’t know why they’re losing!
/r/TheRedPill02/08/19 10:27 PM
12

Anytime you attempt to study human phenomena your hypothesis and conclusion become intricately linked to your own bias. As an example, I can state the exact same study proves that women perform worse when judges are looking directly at them, and the anonymity of the screen allows them to feel more comfortable and therefore perform better, explaining their findings. I can make up any crap I want to because the human mind is a black box, and not open to objective observation.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 03:56 PM
18

It’s really not that hard: Start with your opinion. Bend all reason and logic to fit that opinion. Ex. I don’t think a woman punching a man should be assault. A woman’s fist is more delicate and it probably hurts her just as much if not more, so she has to have a good reason before she would do something that would hurt herself. If anything it should be called “mutual retaliation”, but it’s definitely not assault.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 01:54 PM
23

#BelieveAllEvilFuckingPsychos
/r/MensRights02/08/19 12:08 PM
57

This happens so much it’s cliche. But it’s not, “he left her for a younger woman,” that’s her side of the story. She actually cheated and left him after sex starving their marriage, and then was shocked when he started pulling women 10-20 years younger than her. Meanwhile, men 10 years older than her are turning their noses up, they don’t want to carry her baggage.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/19 12:57 PM
23

They all need this kinda shit to stay loyal. It’s what creates loyalty. He may be better off without this one, absolutely, but if he doesn’t learn from his mistakes, the surfer will leave him too.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/19 12:47 PM
2

Also BS, “Just because you left the person paying for all your stuff shouldn’t mean he has to stop paying for all your stuff.”
/r/MensRights29/07/19 12:53 PM
1

While I wouldn’t want my ex anywhere near my house or food, it would be reasonable by court logic for her to have to pay for my chef and cleaners. And prostitutes. That should just about balance out what’s owed in alimony.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 12:47 PM
23

This is one thing I can’t understand. “You received all the financial benefits while married, so I guess that entitles you to more financial benefits while divorced.” Somehow, women who are taken care of by their husbands are the real victims.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 11:45 PM
7

Imagine making 1.2 million a year for breaking up with your girlfriend.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 03:14 PM
9

Feminists on marriage: it’s not fair that she has to stay home while he provides for her. Feminists on divorce: it’s not fair that she has to go to work while he no longer provides for her. The government is slowly taking all the benefits of marriage away, while also taking all the costs of being single away. This form of incentives and disincentives is destroying the family. In saner times, she had to work when she was single and didn’t have to work when she was married. There was a benefit for…
/r/MensRights20/07/19 02:49 PM
3

Orgasm is easy for men, so women don’t have to work hard or have any experience to please a man. Orgasm is more difficult for women, so men need to work hard and have a lot of experience to please a woman. Because of this difference, men get blamed for being bad at sex. Also, this leads women to value sexually experienced men, while sexually experienced women bring little or no additional value to their relationship, which is usually overshadowed by the costs of their experiences with more exper…
/r/MensRights19/07/19 07:33 PM
-2

I never said I was offended, I’m rationally and without emotion pointing out a double standard that exists between men and women. I even made a sarcastic headline to point out that it was a light hearted post. And what if I were offended? When women are offended we take it seriously and change our behavior. When men are offended? “It’s just a joke, you pussy. Grow some balls and stop whining.” Thank you for proving the point.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 01:33 PM
-5

It’s not the joke, it’s the double standard. Men have been told for years that cracking a joke about women is sexism and must be stopped. And then there’s this. The only response is to bring back offensive jokes about women without apology.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 01:26 PM
6

I did not realize the sentence for rape was a slap on the wrist and a motivational speech. I’m so woke now.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:14 AM
4

The female owner says we don’t serve your kind here. So he leaves and takes his money elsewhere. She goes out of business. She sues him for causing her business to fail because she is female and Muslim.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 11:17 PM
-1

Men have everything except a men only tattoo parlor. Where’s my tattoo safe place?😢
/r/MensRights05/07/19 02:46 PM
3

A Christian baker walks into a tattoo shop...
/r/MensRights05/07/19 02:43 PM
163

Being a cum dumpster is so empowering nowadays.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 02:25 PM
1

What did their father ever do to them? That’s right, nothing.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 08:14 PM
5

I think the real question is why do women have to be told to defend themselves and their girls? Isn’t this just more mansplaining from the patriarchy?
/r/MensRights22/06/19 03:44 AM
1

I wouldn’t think you could open the app or transfer the money without Touch ID or Face ID. Probably a troll revenge fantasy that never happened.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 01:56 AM
18

And when she doesn’t shut it down ignore her. Go to the other side of the room, see if she chooses to follow. The trick is to make it as easy as possible for her to cheat on you because the sooner she does that the sooner you can stop investing in her and move on. She’s not yours it’s just your turn. Mate guarding just delays the inevitable. Find someone who guards herself.
/r/askTRP20/06/19 01:33 PM
20

If it’s transphobic not to sleep with someone who’s trans, then it must be homophobic not to sleep with someone who’s gay. And that means gay men are sexist against women. Do people really not realize how dumb their conclusions sound?
/r/TheRedPill18/06/19 02:47 AM
3

We don’t associate who we have sex with as deserving of a parade. We throw parades for things like world champions, veterans, Independence Day, St Patrick, Thanksgiving. If you want to see a straight parade go to one of those.
/r/askTRP16/06/19 08:25 PM
3

The only thing that will fix your marriage is you need to start acting like you want the divorce. This has the added benefit of preparing you for divorce when she eventually drops the D bomb. Talk to a lawyer privately, start depositing your paychecks in your personal account and pay bills from there. Start taking out a few hundred in cash every month to hide somewhere you can access. You need to set yourself up for outcome independence. She will divorce you or she won’t, and she probably will. …
/r/askTRP13/06/19 02:28 PM
12

An LDR gives him all of the illusions of having a girlfriend with none of the benefits, it gives her the illusion of having a relationship with all of the benefits and none of the responsibilities.
/r/askTRP08/06/19 03:31 PM
5

When all you have is a hammer, all you can do is swing it harder.
/r/askTRP08/06/19 03:18 PM
2

If you can learn how to take care of a child you can learn how to have a relationship with a woman.
/r/askTRP07/06/19 10:44 PM
8

Attempt to deescalate the situation: FAILED
/r/MensRights07/06/19 05:29 PM
21

The buried headline here is that he’s accused, not of rape, but exploiting her sexually with the pretext of marriage. That’s basically every sexual relationship a man has that doesn’t end in marriage, classified as rape because she was hoping to get married. He’s being arrested for not marrying her.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:03 PM
2

You might get over it with time, if you swallow the blue pill. But that doesn’t matter because she won’t get over it. She has a pattern of fucking 2-3 guys a year. Most likely she’s already cheated on you with a one night stand or two. She just hasn’t found a guy as secure as you, yet. You can’t change her behavior, she won’t change her behavior, the relationship is doomed.
/r/askTRP07/06/19 12:25 PM
8

Crazy how she really thinks the government should be 100% responsible for any female who happens to get herself pregnant. It doesn’t matter if she wants the child, or not. She pregnant, somebody owes her.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 04:24 AM
10

You also have to consider that most women are leaving their husbands, and have years to plan their exit strategy. They aren’t suddenly caught off guard and left in a ditch when they file the divorce. Instead of preparing for a career, mostly I see them racking up debt they won’t have to pay off post divorce.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 04:16 AM
23

Not only that, but he’s not a dad until he has a baby. “The woman” killed his chance to be a dad with her abortion. There’s a reason they didn’t call her a mom.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 12:31 AM
12

Respectfully, I thought TRP was amoral. If a guy like Rollo wants to use it to get his dick wet for the first time, game married women, or take a pay day, that’s his business. The guy has contributed a shit ton, and going to speak at a cuck vention isn’t the worst thing he could do. Maybe he was going to preach to the lions den, maybe he was providing legitimate cover to a bunch of conmen. He deserves having us listen to his side of the story before determining any consequences. Conservatives wi…
/r/askTRP03/06/19 12:28 PM
8

They told us to share our feelings. “My wife beats me” “Man up, she can’t hurt you, you must be abusing her if she acts that way.”
/r/MensRights23/05/19 02:22 PM
10

There’re a couple of issues here that make me think you don’t know what you’re doing. She’s attractive, but she’s 27 and you’ve been dating her a month. I assume you’re exclusive with her, and if you’re spending all your time with her, she knows that, too. She’s in full throttle lock-it-down mode, and you’re seeing that as true love. I can only hope that she has a low n count and no children, but there are probably other red flags you failed to mention. You’ve already pointed out a couple of err…
/r/askTRP23/05/19 02:08 PM
22

But why would she lie? I hear this defense against false accusers all the time, and usually there is a reason, such as jealousy, revenge, attention, cheating... but in this case I may have to except that some women will lie for no reason at all.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 01:15 PM
6

Men will never have reproductive rights as long as women maintain control of abortion.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 08:20 PM
3

Women have financial abortion unrelated to the abortion issue. It’s called adoption, and men can’t put their kid up for adoption.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 08:18 PM
1

That’s a different, and interesting ethical dilemma. Since the fetus was already conceived by two consenting adults, and the choice is between abortion or using the technology to keep the baby alive, I think that would be valuable. I guess I went straight to the unethical usage of the technology. Looks like it’s going to be a boy, try again, this one’s going to be white, try again, this one’s going to be straight, try again. In all likely hood, they would make 10 babies, and then choose between …
/r/MensRights18/05/19 05:52 PM
2

No, this will just exacerbate the problems our society currently faces. The current problem is that fathers are regularly kicked out of the family and milked for money. We don’t solve that by kicking women out of the family. Having children is not a right that needs to be protected by government and science. Some people don’t have kids, some people shouldn’t have kids, and that’s OK. Allowing anyone with a pulse, and probably a lot of money, to have a child doesn’t seem like a path worth taking.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 03:20 PM
25

I think you’re on to something. At the time it happens, there is no harassment because there is no power differential. She holds the sexual power while he holds the social power. She rejects him from a position of power. How many harassment claims are just he was inappropriate, he came on to me inappropriately? If she still has the power to reject him, how can he be the oppressor? Even when Weinstein comes out in a robe and asks for a massage, she had the power to say no, without him forcing him…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/19 03:11 PM
2

Because only women can be raped. And any woman who wants an abortion was obviously raped, probably by a relative. /s The real argument they’re putting forward is that women have no agency, and therefore shouldn’t have any consequences.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 02:44 PM
2

Their rebuttal is that all pregnant women are 11 year old victims of forcible rape by their uncle. They honestly don’t believe a woman has any control over being pregnant. Why do women have preventative birth control, if they don’t want responsibility for a kid they could just not have sex. Oh, your condom failed, too bad for you, shouldn’t have had sex if you didn’t want to be a dad.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 02:40 PM
5

Let’s force boys to have involuntary surgery to avoid women having voluntary surgery. Keep your laws off the female body, and put them on the male body instead. Since some women want to have sex without getting pregnant, let’s sterilize all men. Feminism, it’s also for men tm.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 02:33 PM
1

When a woman asks for money for having custody of the kids, the first question a judge should ask is if the father is able to have more custody of the kids. If he is unable or refuses to give time to his kids, then he can be asked for money. The primary contribution of a parent is time, and you cannot replace that with money, as the courts have done to fathers.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 02:03 PM
4

In the US, first she files for a temporary restraining order. Make the guy homeless, then go after the money.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 01:46 PM
7

Yes, except when women decide they want a divorce, they also decide the husband is a shitty person for making her want a divorce.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 01:43 PM
1

Look, all kids suffer because their mothers and fathers are morons. That’s just life. You: the laws have ways to abdicate that responsibility. Also you: the point of laws is to enforce his moral obligation to pay for his kids. Facts: there is no legal way for a father to abdicate his responsibility to a child without the mother’s permission. There are several ways for a mother to abdicate her responsibility without the father even knowing. Do bio parents have a moral responsibility to pay for th…
/r/MensRights14/05/19 03:56 PM
2

You’re confusing “care for” with “provide money for.” OP can “care for” his kid by letting the child live with him, and providing the kid with food and shelter. The government has said, no, you are not allowed to care for your kid, you are only allowed to provide money for your kid. That money goes to the mother, with the unverified hope that it supports the child. Who’s to say if OP carelessly impregnated several women? Maybe he really wanted to have a family, but the mother left him and took t…
/r/MensRights14/05/19 03:07 PM
3

The OP literally has an income requirement, that if he can’t meet he’ll be taken from his kid and locked in jail. Why should the government be setting income requirements for parents? If he ends up on welfare or disability, is he no longer eligible to be a good father by your definition?
/r/MensRights14/05/19 02:16 PM
3

No, I don’t believe that, because that would imply that there is an income requirement to be a parent. Is an unemployed mother not a parent, is a stay at home dad not a parent?
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:41 PM
5

Maybe he expected to be a father, not a paycheck.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 04:13 AM
4

The OP wants men to do more of the fighting for women’s rights, not realizing that countless men have fought and died for the rights that she uses to fight for women’s rights. It’s sad that many mothers have died in childbirth, but their deaths were to create life, not ensure the rights of women and men.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 05:59 PM
6

Those wars won her the freedom to be an entitled cunt. She would not exist as the person that she is without them. Instead of gratitude, she just wants more male sacrifice.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 04:58 PM
48

A taxi service to protect female drivers from 12 year old boys. I say let her start her service, see how much money she can lose before closing up shop.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 01:12 AM
3

She thinks her friend makes her look good by comparison.
/r/askTRP09/05/19 11:02 PM
2

I saw some article about how pathetic men are still doing less than half the household chores. I haven’t seen an article about how pathetic women are still earning less than half the household income.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 10:47 PM
2

Yes, abuse of the system is the worst, sure sometimes support is fair. But in my experience, those cases are more rare than the man just being exploited by the system’s abuse. Now abuse is routine, and a fair outcome is rare.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 03:53 PM
4

I don’t have a problem with men working and women staying at home, that’s a choice of individuals that I have no say in. I have a problem with feminism telling women they deserve payouts in divorce for doing their half of the work in marriage. The truth is that feminists hate women, they want them to be like men, and they hate men, they want them to be like women. But this doesn’t change the natural choices that people make. Women are attracted to hard working men, and men are attracted to carin…
/r/MensRights02/05/19 01:29 PM
4

This is entirely how the system is entirely set up against men. Men are expected to take care of the wife and kids while they stay at home during the marriage. Then, coincidently right about when the kids are old enough school, and she can go back to work, she divorces the man for no reason. Now the man is expected to take care of her and the kids in divorce, too. How many men are caught in this bait and switch, you take care of me in marriage, and you take care of me in divorce? Just because so…
/r/MensRights02/05/19 01:18 PM
4

Because it’s all part of the plan. A woman stays home and nobody bats an eye, a man stays home and everyone loses their minds!
/r/MensRights02/05/19 01:03 PM
1

It’s funny how house wives rarely transition to childcare or maid services. Somehow in divorce that becomes beneath them.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 01:02 PM
4

You don’t have to agree to let your wife quit, it’s a decision she can make whether you agree or not. So if your wife quits today and tells you tomorrow, you still think it’s your responsibility to pay for her decision?
/r/MensRights02/05/19 01:00 PM
29

He won’t listen until after the divorce.
/r/askTRP29/04/19 04:05 AM
8

It’s accepted as fact that women feel more comfortable working around more woman and we need to increase the woman ratio to fix it. It’s accepted as sexism that men feel comfortable working around so many men and we need to increase the woman ratio to fix it.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 04:06 AM
1

It would also be interesting to understand which profiles are swiped left. I would be willing to imagine that the 46% that men swipe covers 80% of the women, while the 14% that women swipe covers 20% of the men.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/19 10:46 PM
2

The same could be said of encouraging the surplus of this 80% discarded males to pair up.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/19 09:29 PM
1

If there is anything still sacred in this society, it’s a woman’s right to choose.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/19 09:26 PM
1

I can tell you how female hypergamy is discussed in the media. The problem is that men are too proud to date a smarter, more successful woman, that men can’t handle a strong woman, that men want a simple woman who is easily controlled. Hypergamy is presented as another male problem, another example of toxic masculinity. This is the playing field we’re fighting on. But as others have pointed out, it’s an unstable short term advantage that will weed itself out over time.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/19 09:10 PM
1

Bro, great right up, but I have to correct one thing; she didn’t rule out half the male population, she ruled out 80% of it. She specifically states about 20% OF THE 40% MALE, not 20% of the school population ( which would be half the male population ). She’s proving the Pareto principle, and chasing only the top 10% males. Think of the article from poor Chad the victim’s perspective. He wants to find a stable relationship with a nice Catholic girl, but because he is in the 10% of desirable sing…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/19 08:18 PM
-6

It’s common knowledge that once you go black, you never go back. This isn’t racist because black people acknowledge it as fact. He’s clearly looking for a long term relationship, why should he subject himself to someone who will inevitably leave him because of his race?
/r/MensRights10/04/19 02:01 PM
25

You can understand a lot about TRP if you accept this: both men and women enjoy sex, but for men it’s an end, for women it’s the means.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/19 05:27 AM
18

RoboChad can’t spend his own money on her, can’t choose to stay with her despite having options, can’t make her girlfriends jealous when they can just go out and buy the same model. Robots can’t provide women with what they want because what they want is to be given value by a high value man.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/19 12:39 AM
3

The value is the same, they’ve driven the costs way up though.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/19 12:35 AM
1

Let me get this straight. You think that someone with no sexual morals, an unregulated desire for sexual intimacy, no personal boundaries, no concept of laws or consent, spends their nights planning unwanted sexual encounters with strangers...and your plan is to rape this person? [pauses, smiles] Good luck
/r/MensRights05/04/19 12:28 AM
6

I wonder why it didn’t work between them.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 12:20 AM
5

Perhaps “made the choice” is the wrong phrasing. In order to make the choice to stay at home, that choice has to be given by the other partner. Men are more likely to give women the choice to stay at home. Which is why it’s more rare to hear about men making the choice to stay home, fewer men are “given the choice” to stay at home by the woman.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 07:00 PM
4

A black man, a gay man, and a woman walk into a bar. One of them ends up the DNC nominee.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 02:28 PM
11

Let me explain how child support works in my state, and see if you can spot the problem: Based on parents’ combined income, a basic support requirement is set. Let’s say $3,000. Based on parents individual incomes, support is assigned to each parent. The dad makes 2x the mom, so he is assigned $2,000 and she is assigned $1,000. Based on overnights with the child, the parents share is proportional to their custody, so if it is 50/50, he is obligated to $1,000 and she is obligated to $500. This al…
/r/MensRights30/03/19 11:10 PM
10

It’s already called taxes.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 09:45 PM
14

She’s only offering what she wants from him. That won’t change his heart.
/r/RedPillWomen21/03/19 02:12 AM
35

The entire idea that the consent movement would protect women from rape was nonsense from the start. What’s the one group of people who don’t care about consent? Rapists. Teaching men to get consent to stop rape would be like teaching shoppers to pay for their groceries to stop shoplifting. Consent can’t protect a woman from being raped, it only prevents the man from being convicted of rape.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/19 12:48 AM
3

I totally agree, the current fuck fest is fueled by technical advances in birth control, but it doesn’t change the underlying dynamics you describe. I figured there would be plenty of beta males to stick around to have sex once a month and raise children that aren’t theirs, but I think you’re right, even they would realize she’s not breeding with him and only using him for his resources, and eventually check out of the fatherhood game. Feminism laments single motherhood, feminism creates single …
/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 01:39 PM
3

There’s only one position, the natural position. In a polygamous situation, the woman secures the resources of multiple men who don’t know if the offspring is their own. Even men who have sexual access to multiple women won’t know if they’ve sexually reproduced. For this reason, polygamy means security for the woman, and a gamble for the man.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 04:38 AM
8

Imagine being so miserable in life that you have to produce a video for the world to see about how you’re life isn’t so bad and all your failed relationships and inability to be of any long term value to another human, something every one else you know was able to do, isn’t caused by the lie that feminism sold you or deep personality and character flaws that you refuse to address in yourself, but just because you’re indecisive. She honestly believes that feminism didn’t fail her, that she could …
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 01:59 PM
64

Society has broken women. Men used to be there to pick up the pieces and make them whole again. Now they insist they can do it on their own. And men continue on. She will find her happy ending, but she will never be happy. She can find a husband, have children and get divorced. Or she can live her life single, never knowing the commitment she never had or gave. But she will always be miserable.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/19 08:51 PM
1

My argument is that multiple sexual partners, “sluts”, male and female, pits individuals at greater risks and ultimately has real costs on society. Therefore society has justification in trying to discourage this risky and costly behavior. Is slut shaming the best tactic? Probably not. Is it a rational outcome of real problems? Yes it is. It is a reaction to a real problem, you’re not going to get rid of it without getting rid of the problem. Address the problems, don’t expect telling people not…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:08 PM
0

Seriously? You asked for a valid reason, I gave you seven. Your response is that safe sex is accessible therefore people who don’t have sex have the same risks as those who have a lot of sex, I’m possessive, and it’s all men’s fault anyway. Okay, nice chatting with you. We’ve had safe sex for 50 years and yet all these reasons still exist. Maybe safe sex doesn’t negate the argument.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:36 PM
1

1) STDs 2) unintended pregnancy 3) teenage pregnancy 4) abortion 5) single motherhood 6) child support 7) welfare All of these are costs society covers when she can’t keep it in her pants. I’d say society has good reason to shame behavior that leads to negative consequences.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:07 PM
2

You are totally missing the point... Slut shaming is based on the behavior of the person, ie the contents of the book. Height prejudice is based on the external appearance outside of the person’s control, ie the cover of the book. Don’t judge a book by its cover.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:38 AM
5

What your describing isn’t about putting him first. You’re a grown woman with children and responsibilities of your own. Changing your mindset is about giving him responsibility and accepting his decisions. If he makes a decision, or tells you what he wants, there’s a difference between asking clarifying questions so you better understand what he wants, and questioning his decision, based on what you want. When you start deciding what he wants based on what you think is best, fresh salsa for exa…
/r/RedPillWomen02/02/19 03:25 PM
5

With prostitution he would get something for his money.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 11:31 PM
112

Real Feminists truly understand equality of outcomes. They recognize that the man has had the benefit of looking at her beautiful body all dinner, and she has paid the price of eye rape the entire dinner, so naturally, the man who has received additional benefits must necessarily pay for the dinner in order to balance the historical oppression woman has faced the past 2,000 years of her life. He should also give her a good tip. It’s all about equality of outcomes. If they go to a $100 meal, and …
/r/MensRights31/01/19 03:57 PM
5

Great post and great practical advice. The mental load is just another invention of feminists to complain about everything people do as a normal part of life. “Oh, poor me, I have to do all these things, and I have to worry about all the things I have to do! That’s double the labor of men because they just do things without worrying!” That’s not a problem for men to solve, that’s a neurosis for her therapist to solve. All of the feminist problems in that comic can be solved by a free phone app.
/r/RedPillWomen29/01/19 03:14 PM
5

Top comments immediately go to how creepy men are around middle school girls, despite the post describing female pedophilia.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 03:43 PM
1

You should be a better role model.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:44 PM
2

I’m not here to argue with you, I’m simply explaining how words work. In English, the adjective proceeds the noun it’s modifying. So “toxic masculinity” implies the adjective, toxic, applies to the noun, masculinity, and that the masculinity is toxic. You wouldn’t describe a “black car” and then clarify that, obviously you didn’t mean the car was black, but that the driver of the car was black, therefore black car. An application of masculinity is a behavior. The words your looking for is “toxic…
/r/MensRights20/01/19 06:30 PM
3

No matter how you run the numbers sexual assault and physical bullying are disproportionately committed by brunettes. This is an indisputable fact. However, because this statistic is a correlation, and does not represent a causation, it has absolutely no value producing a solution. It would be like trying to solve homelessness by asking men to stop being homeless, since they are the majority of people without homes. Do you recognize the flaw in that logic? Say it with me, “Men don’t cause homele…
/r/MensRights20/01/19 03:20 PM
3

If it’s the application which is toxic, and not an inherent disposition of masculinity, then shouldn’t it be called “toxic applications”? I mean, that’s just how words work.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 11:17 PM
15

That’s why we can just call it toxic, without associating masculine or feminine with it.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 10:56 PM
6

This is what I don’t understand about the current system. It used to be that the man had to support the woman after divorce because divorce was rare and women didn’t have to have jobs because men took care of them financially. Alimony was just a continuation of the old guard assumption that somebody had to take care of her. Now women can take care of themselves, and the argument has shifted to b-b-b-but he makes more money than her, he has to share some of his money with her! If you can support …
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:04 PM
158

By describing bullying and sexual harassment as “toxic masculinity”, Gillette is stating that 1) these negative behaviors are inherent to being male; 2) women don’t bully or sexually harass others; 3) men are responsible for protecting women, as though men didn’t pass anti discrimination, equal pay laws, corporate sexual harassment policies, zero tolerance school bullying policies. Men have effectively banned all forms of these behaviors in society, yet they’re still complaining that men haven’t…
/r/MensRights19/01/19 04:45 PM
2

It’s 2019, women don’t need men to be the hero and protect them anymore, they have HR departments and the government to do that now.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 03:57 PM
3

Good question. To me the answer is yes, but that means different things to the man and the woman. The husband may have to give more spiritually and emotionally, and perhaps materialistically to the wife. While she may have to give more nurturing, home care, and sexually to the husband. But this is just because men and women are different, and without reducing to stereotypes, on average want different things. I suppose I could have clarified that the relationship needs do need to come before the …
/r/RedPillWomen04/01/19 06:19 AM
2

You’re going to compare the feminist left destroying marriage with the religious right watching more midget porn? I don’t see an equivalency.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/18 05:02 PM
2

Think Fight Club. On the one hand it was an orderly group built around rules meant to protect and improve the in group. On the other hand, they went out into society to fuck shit up and accelerate the decline of society. Feminism has already wreaked havoc on our culture, with the support of beta males with no understanding of socially stable sexual dynamics. So, while we learn how to protect ourselves against the wrong women, and improve ourselves as men creating a stable in group for the right …
/r/TheRedPill31/12/18 04:58 PM
27

“Stop practicing witchcraft if you don’t want to be accused.” -some 14 year old girl in Salem
/r/MensRights29/12/18 06:24 AM
19

That is all great advice. As to the question of “how do I do things I feel repulsed by,” consider that your husband was sweet and understanding for you while you pushed him away. That must be hard for him. Are you repulsed by pleasing your husband, giving him something he wants, or making him happy? When you give something to someone else, it’s supposed to be something they like, not something you like. That’s how I can watch a Hallmark movie with my girl and not feel disgusted. Feminism taught …
/r/RedPillWomen29/12/18 06:02 AM
7

The Red Pill doesn’t concern itself with what men do with the information, and neither should you. There’s no benefit to quitting your job, it’s a big risk and costs money, and yet men retire all the time. Don’t worry about other men’s strategies, focus on improving your own.
/r/askTRP29/12/18 05:39 AM
52

Support your child “financially, through the mother.” It doesn’t matter if you’re a caring, loving, supportive father if you ain’t paying that baby momma wage. It doesn’t even matter if that baby momma ran off with the kids and you can no longer see them. This seems like a constitutional search and seizure issue without due process.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 03:58 PM
2

It makes it a lot easier to say Democrat’s hate men, and are racist against whites.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 02:30 PM
6

Wait, but according to feminists, any gender pay gap is bad. According to this article, taking time off leads to a greater pay gap. According to feminists, we need better maternity leave, so more women can choose to take time off. Which according to this article will lead to a greater pay gap. FEMINISTS WANT TO INCREASE THE PAY GAP!!!
/r/MensRights30/11/18 11:39 PM
11

Being a mother pays, but you have to stay married to the father. That’s work a lot of women don’t want to do. This article is paving the way for why companies should have to pay women even after they quit their job. Obviously women only take time off to take care of other people, not to travel the world. Besides, by taking time off to find herself, she’s really providing society with a ton of emotional labor. Corporate Alimony, coming to a western society near you.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 11:33 PM
9

Women who take time off ...GASP... make less money than men who don’t. Men who take time off ...Wait For It... make less money than women who don’t.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 11:24 PM
3

What would they even overcome? The CC and careerist are defined by their selfishness, taking whatever they want, pursuing short term goals instead of sacrificing for long term happiness. They would have to overcome their own self centeredness, which has led them to quick and easy successes. ​ The men who come here are made stronger through their failure, and overcoming adversity. These women don't have adversity to overcome.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/18 05:37 AM
5

That’s exactly my point. Rigged schools and family courts are systemic male problems and I agree we should solve them to reduce the suicide rate.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 09:54 PM
3

It’s weird that that’s what you took away from my ironic comment, “... men getting so good at not dying...”, and turned that into men are better at the job of journalism. That’s clearly not what I said or intended. After defending the politicized gendered statistic, you retreat to “Equality! Protect all journalists! It’s not a gendered issue!” No one will argue with that, so what is the value of gendering the issue by drawing attention to how many of those deaths were male or female when we shou…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 05:39 PM
4

If you want to learn why women are suddenly dying at a higher rate, you should investigate what male journalists are doing right. In the same year that the female death rate jumped from 7 to 19 percent, men actually decreased their death rate by 12%! Why are men getting so good at not dying while women are getting so bad at it? Perhaps it’s because slicing and dicing statistics to serve a political purpose has no scientific or educational value. Based on that statistic, and the knowledge that it…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 04:43 PM
10

Simple, women stay at home, men do the dangerous work. Zero dead female journalists. Sometimes I think that feminists aren’t fighting the patriarchy, they are the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 04:16 PM
15

Now the government is actively financing the destruction of families. How about 15 million in free counseling and relationship services? Nah, men are evil, here’s an interest free loan for you to leave him, and don’t forget to take the kids on your way out. We need a public service campaign for these poor women getting trapped in these patriarchal marriages. If a man asks you to marry him, JUST SAY NO. Too many women are just too nice and sensitive to the man’s feelings that they agree to marry …
/r/MensRights20/11/18 04:02 PM
12

That’s great, I hope it doesn’t sound like I’m against asking for help. Asking for help is absolutely a great thing to do for those that are struggling with depression and suicidal thoughts. I’m glad you asked for help, and more importantly, received help from others so that you are still here today. My concern is for those that do ask for help, are ignored, commit suicide out of desperation, and are then blamed for being too manly to ask for help.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 03:44 PM
21

Suicide is not an individual problem of masculinity. It’s a social issue. No one has ever said I’m too much of a man to talk about my problems so I guess I’ll just kill myself. You’re blaming the victim if you think suicide is their fault for not asking for help. Here’s what society tells a man who is masculine enough to ask for help: -I can’t afford to pay child support, I barely make rent while my ex kept the house. “Fuck off, pay for your kids or go to jail” -My wife beats me with a rolling p…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 03:21 PM
101

Come on bros, let’s teach men not to kill themselves! Society loves to tell us that our masculinity is to blame for all problems, that our nature as men is the cause. So tell me, why don’t we here about the All American high school football jock committing suicide? Why is it more frequently the gay kid, the gender fluid kid, the kid rejected by girls and society, the fat kid, the bullied kid, the druggie kid, the man who loses his wife, and then kids to divorce courts, the man going to prison fo…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 02:06 PM
1

After all, the male obviously has the power, so by exercising that power to deny the woman what she needs, he is by definition oppressing her. And for bonus points, if she is black and he’s not, he’s racist, if she is trans, he’s transphobic, if she is fat, he’s a fatphobic. Have I earned by SJW card?
/r/MensRights19/11/18 02:34 PM
1

What’s more telling of his view on the world is the straw man he sets up, a perfect and loving wife abandoned by her abusive violent husband. 70% of the time the wife leaves the husband in no-fault grounds. Does he believe in lifetime alimony for the abusive woman who leaves her husband? Or are all women morally pure in his fairy tale life? If the man is abusive we have civil courts where she can sue him for emotional distress, by that is not the case that family courts deal with when they award…
/r/MensRights17/11/18 06:54 PM
54

"If you go in somebody’s dorm room and she touches you, and places your penis in her mouth, she has not conveyed consent," Yes, but what about the fact that neither did he before she touched his genitals? Feminists truly see consent as a one way street.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 05:24 AM
1

Thanks! I’d about given up on reddit after they quarantined TRP for making the same basic argument, that guys and girls are different.
/r/RedPillWomen31/10/18 09:59 PM
1

It was free under my medical insurance
/r/askTRP26/09/18 02:07 PM
13

If they move in together, she won’t be allowed in her own house without breaking one of her own rules.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 02:05 PM
2

You do a good job of confusing authority over and dominance over. We freely give those who provide and protect us a position of authority and respect. We do this because they are providing a service for us, and in exchange for that service we cooperate with their rules. A police officer has authority over me, but she does not have dominance over me. She is responsible for protecting me, so when she tells me to put my hands up, I obey her. So for tens of thousands of years, men have had to provid…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 01:50 PM
31

There’s only one way they look at it for dads. Deadbeat.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 09:36 PM
5

If it were truly critical labor, then they would be able to charge money for it. The fact is, if your girlfriend wants to charge you for an eight hour day to have dinner ready for you when you get home from work, simply fire her and get a girlfriend who will gladly do it for free. Critical labor also supposes that the other person can’t cook or cleanup after himself. We could just say single people work twice as hard as couples because they do this critical work of staying alive all by themselve…
/r/MensRights23/09/18 09:17 PM
1

If a father who pays $600/month in child support is hit by a drunk driver, where his two children are killed and he is put in a coma for six months, when he wakes up will he be arrested for not paying $3,600 to his dead children? It doesn’t look like there is a provision for ending child support on the death of the child without going to court.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 05:10 AM
3

Her body her choice, how about my money my choice? Since when does the government enforce how much money parents spend on their children? They only seem to care about the non-custodial parent pays, after the government has already taken away his children.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:46 AM
1

“Take care of the child” can mean a lot of things besides becoming a wage slave to the mother. The court has the right to take the child from you and grant her full custody, and force you to pay the mother for the child the court won’t let you take care of.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:39 AM
5

How could she be sexually violating while he was busy raping her?
/r/MensRights12/09/18 03:29 AM
1

But how do we determine if the baby is white? Should we use the “one drop” rule for racial purity?
/r/MensRights06/09/18 04:08 PM
2

Why do these people think that only the hard right, religious fundamentalists, and men’s rights activists can be bigots? She doesn’t understand why lesbians are oppressing trans people when they should be fighting the patriarchy for oppressing people. It’s almost like feeling oppressed by one group has nothing to do with being willing to oppress another group.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 03:57 PM
10

It looks like he got about 50% off the price he paid for the treatment. Seems about right since the clinic got 50% wrong parent. /s
/r/MensRights06/09/18 01:06 PM
8

I agree with you. But there is something satisfying about watching those who would advocate for criminalizing speech having their speech criminalized. Perhaps they will learn something valuable and we can all be friends in the future.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 05:10 AM
5

Is it fair to say women are rewarded for avoiding failure, and men are rewarded for achieving success? That as education has become feminized, men are being taught to avoid failure rather than chase success. Men that chase success and fail are punished more harshly today by society’s application of feminine values. While men who don’t chase success are rewarded with the same medal the hard workers receive. As the cost of failure increases, and the rewards of success decrease, the value of opport…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/18 02:36 PM
17

Exactly, I’m not worried about my life, I’m worried about the 80% when they realize their life has been made shit and they take to the streets looking for looting and welfare. Society either works for 80% of men or it gets burned down to the ground. All the fucking and lifting and earning isn’t going to change that. My hope is TRP is enough to make a difference for that 60% to turn things around.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/18 04:16 AM
2

They graduate, and drop out of the workforce in a 10 years because they would rather spend time with their kids. Private colleges are responding to the fact that women have access to more college scholarships. They don’t care what happens to them after that.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 01:14 PM
6

Also, didn’t Rose and Asia know each other and plan the accusations together? That makes it seem like two ex girlfriends colluding for revenge rather than two victims having simultaneous changes of heart years after the crime. Isn’t that the plot of Wild Things?
/r/MensRights21/08/18 12:51 PM
6

So since gay marriage is legal, I would be married to my college roommate.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 04:23 AM
16

This is the first time I’m reading the details of her accusations agains Weinstein. He invites her to an empty hotel room, she agrees. He’s dressed in a robe and asks for a massage, she agrees. He then performs oral sex on her, she pretends to enjoy it. They date for several years after that. 15 years later she thinks to mention the rape. Is there something here we can teach our daughters about how not to get raped? How was she taken seriously?
/r/MensRights21/08/18 03:53 AM
15

It’s not for the child though, it goes to the ex wife, just like alimony. How can you say that the money the ex gets for divorce is handled in any way differently than the money she gets for child support? How can you say it improves the child’s standard of living but not the ex? That money directly and implicitly goes to the the ex. Even if it’s spent on baby food, that’s $100 she didn’t have to spend that she can use for her hair and nails. The bigger issue for me is the government is valuing …
/r/MensRights09/08/18 01:36 PM
0

Vet for ltr and Next early and often. Half of being an alpha is treating women how they deserve to be treated. I was taught that every girl is a special priceless snowflake and any girl could be ltr. So instead of treating the slut like a slut, I treated her like a girlfriend. I thought any girl that would have sex with me was my girlfriend now, without realizing I really didn’t want the kind of slut that would sleep with me as my girlfriend. Let me tell you, the best possible outcome there is s…
/r/askTRP09/08/18 04:44 AM
17

Why buy the milk when you can have the cow for free?
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:57 PM
1

Yeah, it’s hard teaching your son not to want to help people. And it’s even worse when his sister appreciates it rather than giving him a lecture on the patriarchy. Good luck with all of that. But it’s worth it once your son eventually learns never to help women, and your daughter finally understands she knows everything already.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 04:14 AM
5

I read this post a bit ago about a woman who wanted to divorce her husband. They had a child with special needs, and she was resentful that she had to quit her job to stay home with the child, she was resentful that her husband was the breadwinner, she was resentful that he didn’t contribute enough labor caring for the kids and the house, she was resentful that he didn’t ask her how she felt, she was resentful that he wanted to have sex with her. While he bore everything that life threw at him w…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/18 01:24 PM
14

20-25; I’ll take the sexiest guy that will have me. 25-30; I’ll take a good guy that will have me. 30-35; I’ll take the best provider that will have me. 35-40; I’ll take control of my own life. 40+; I’m so alone. Throughout their lives, women think they deserve one thing or another from a man, never considering what they offer. They become increasingly interested in red pill men naturally as they age, because the young Chads won’t have them, the blue pilled have bored them, and now red pilled of…
/r/TheRedPill24/07/18 03:27 PM
1

Stop wasting your time. She’s 31, do you think she’s two years away from marrying Prince Charming? Drop her so some other guy can pick her up and drag things out for a few years. She’s not going to get commitment attention from any guy worthwhile.
/r/askTRP22/07/18 10:31 PM
14

Once those kids hit 6 or 7, he’s going to have 50% less stuff.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/18 06:13 PM
6

Because men are actually having their careers ruined by women, and are afraid to work with women now, women may potentially lose hypothetical career opportunities. And that is a problem.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 02:37 AM
4

Men can also harass other men, seems to be her implication.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 02:33 AM
3

“Trauma impacts memory.” So we shouldn’t trust what victims state they remember?
/r/MensRights27/06/18 01:56 AM
1

That’s not how jokes work. Saying that the award category is genderless and she is excited that 80% of the nominees are women, is just two factual statements. It’s not funny that she feels that way, as she’s telling the truth. Unfortunately, it’s a bigoted attitude. Perhaps it’s a more accepted bigoted attitude to have, than if she said race is not a factor, but we’re excited that 80% of the nominees are white. That doesn’t make it a joke though, it just makes it more sad.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 01:55 AM
2

If it’s a joke, what’s the punchline?
/r/MensRights20/06/18 12:55 PM
3

If you tell him and he thinks it’s unreasonable to refrain from hugging and kissing you, then he is completely wrong for you. If you tell him before the date and he still wants to see you, then he has potential. Or at least potential to have potential. If you hide your issues about touching to see if he is right for you, then you’re catfishing, and may be tricking him into a relationship under terms he doesn’t want. I’ve never seen that end well.
/r/RedPillWomen09/06/18 06:59 PM
3

On the one hand, red pill advice would be to improve yourself first. Work on yourself to address your issues with socially normal touch. It will open your opportunities for more quality men. Short of that, just tell the guy early on, even before your date. It will turn a lot of guys off of dating you, but if that’s what you want, that’s what you get.
/r/RedPillWomen09/06/18 01:32 PM
5

Yes, but sympathy is.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 01:23 PM
29

You point out a meaningful difference between girl game and guy game. When a girl uses sex to get sex, she’s a slut, and when a guy uses commitment to try and get commitment, he’s a beta. They’re playing the wrong game for their gender. Girls should be using their sex as a means to commitment, and guys should be using commitment as a means to a good sexual relationship. When a girl plays by guy’s rules, trying to get sex, it’s like a soccer player kicking the ball into her own goal and thinking …
/r/RedPillWomen08/06/18 02:50 PM
10

She nailed the thousand cock stare in that photo.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/18 02:18 PM
2

One difference to recognize is that men aren’t taught to be independent, they’re simply left to themselves to fend for themselves. Some manage to rise to the top by this sink or swim mentality, but many sink to the bottom, and most just float around. Ask yourself why there are no men empowerment courses, why men aren’t taught to be independent, why men aren’t taught history filtered through a gendered lens? Men learn cooperation and dependence through team sports and military service, women are …
/r/MensRights03/06/18 04:00 PM
11

Finally, thanks to this bike shop, they can. Welcome to 2018 cishet scum.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 12:59 AM
2

Like many feminist endeavors, this could backfire against women in a major way. Since laws are still enforced by evidence and logic, not feelings and hearsay, it becomes impossible to prosecute a rapist under this definition. Since it’s impossible to prove consent happened for every act every time, it’s just as impossible to prove consent didn’t happen for every act every time. It’s up to the prosecution to prove consent didn’t happen. Then it’s going to be up to the woman to explain that yes sh…
/r/MensRights24/05/18 12:53 AM
36

This is all based on the misconception that women don’t have sex, they have sex done to them. Obviously she doesn’t have to ask permission to have sex done to her, he must ask if he is allowed to have sex to her. It’s based on the idea that women have no agency, and are purely reactants to their environment. This is a sexist belief that began as a way to explain why women shouldn’t expect the same rights and responsibilities as men. Now feminism has adopted it because they don’t actually want th…
/r/MensRights24/05/18 12:25 AM
11

All this shows how poor women are at long term planning. She probably thinks, like many feminists currently, that short term “marriage” contracts would have saved her a lot of trouble when she wanted to get out of her previous marriage. Because what women really want is choice. And choice is contradictory to success. Because success requires making choices, not having choices. Marriage requires making a single decision that affects the rest of your life. Women can go their whole lives without ma…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/18 12:10 AM
7

It’s also because the modern family must have two homes, instead of sharing a single family home. Same capacity, double the demand. All because women can’t stand to live with their children’s father, and make him buy his own house after buying hers.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/18 11:31 PM
2

The end result of all feminist actions is counter productive. I imagine a future where the sex offender list is so meaningless as to become a badge of honor for men. Women will use the public address registry to find men to hook up with. Other men will wish they could have sex with a woman to get on the list.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/18 01:12 PM
2

Exactly, boys are “groomed” by society to want to have sex with older women. If a girl wanted to have sex with her 30 year old boyfriend, we certainly put him in jail as a predatory pedophile who psychologically groomed his victim. We remove any agency from the girl, and apply complete agency to the boy. They’re both children.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 01:02 PM
75

Can’t. I got an ex-wife to pay.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 03:39 PM
3

It’s not the government’s role to judge who the better parent is. This helps to get them out of that role.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 05:36 PM
11

It’s the best way to ensure the man is homeless as soon as you divorce him. All he’s left with is the shirt on his back.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 05:33 PM
3

There are so many things wrong with those equations, using statistics to prove individual discrimination. Let’s say a man works at mcDonalds at minimum wage with a .25 raise every year. He’s been a fry cook four years making $1 over minimum wage. They hire a female fry cook to do the exact same work. Should she start at $1 over minimum wage even though the man earned it over four years? Equal pay for equal work just means give us what others earned.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 08:53 PM
5

Thanks for taking the time to elaborate on this for those who think alpha = free sex. Men can be socially alpha, they can be sexually alpha, they can be financially alpha, they can be physically alpha. It’s about having a plan and the mindset to execute on it. To say some fat ugly introvert who makes millions and does whatever he wants isn’t alpha because he doesn’t spend time picking up girls in clubs misses the point of TRP. That guy knows his own value, and he knows the value of the women he …
/r/askTRP25/04/18 02:21 PM
28

He lost his money while they were still married.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 10:15 PM
25

And even if the woman didn’t want to be there.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 04:31 AM
11

This is a very interesting point. He’s opened himself up to her, and shown how trustworthy and stable he actually is. She’s bored or confused, that there must be something more, and invents these paranoia’s so she can go snooping for treasures on WhatsApp and FB. But guess what, she won’t find anything there except more of the same decent guy. It won’t solve his problem. When I read about her behavior, I immediately thought alpha widow. Sure enough, she was cheated on (That isn’t alpha behavior,…
/r/askTRP18/04/18 02:15 PM
1

I for one think your academic interest is fascinating. That two people can look at the same literary evidence and come out with vastly different interpretations, is the source of many wars. Being able to accept that other person without feeling your own beliefs are threatened would be the source of great peace. To be fair, we could credit god with all deaths ever, because he is the one kicked out Adam and Eve from eternal life in Eden, just for eating from the wrong tree. I still look at that as…
/r/TheRedPill02/03/18 03:25 PM
1

I appreciate the discussion, and your knowledge of the Bible seems greater than many Christians. Unfortunately, you use that to construct straw man arguments about what Christians believe about their god. You imagine a God that is emotionally and morally constrained by your own limited world view. You believe that a god with absolute power must be absolutely corrupt, as any human would be. You question the scientific validity of a god unconstrained by science, despite the evidence that immateria…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/18 04:18 AM
1

I don’t think you’ll get anywhere, arguing aspects of the Bible that you don’t believe anyway. Your argument rests on a grammatical choice of translation from Hebrew to English. God hardened the Pharaoh’s heart in the same way that he created the pharaoh in the first place. If God knows all things, and created all things, isn’t he then responsible for all things? Why do we have criminal courts, when in the end, God is the one to blame for all things? By accepting god’s omnipotence while simultan…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/18 12:39 AM
1

I appreciate your points. My counter point is, that even if religion didn’t exist, all of those things would still happen, wars would be fought, parents would punish their kids, people would be tortured, unjustly imprisoned, killed, and still fail to understand proven scientific concepts. You say religion makes people do bad things, I say that people do bad things. The crusades were one of hundreds of wars for political conquest of the key trading routes of the Middle East. Do you believe those …
/r/TheRedPill28/02/18 07:35 PM
1

God is only presented as the Father in the Bible, or the son. But never the mother.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/18 05:00 PM
1

You’re purposefully misinterpreting what is documented in the Bible with what is sanctioned by God. As far as Passover goes, there were nine plagues of Egypt before that final one. So what makes you the moral arbitrator of the cost for the freedom of Jewish slaves? Those lives would have been lost 10 years later if Jews had to fight a war for their freedom, plus thousands more on both sides. But I guess as far as you care, slavery is OK, and Jews should have just been happy slaves, and God shoul…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/18 04:55 PM
3

You can only control one thing, if you stay or if you go. Since Eve, women have wanted what they can’t have. Don’t tell her what she can’t do, this will just make her want it more. Be what she wants, but can’t have.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 01:53 PM
16

I’ll never understand how a perceived privilege of all men rationalizes the actual oppression of an individual man. Because “all men” make more money than all women, you must be punished with less chocolate.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:37 PM
2

I would argue that a false rape accusation is a form of sexual abuse, it’s abuse for sexual reasons. Also, the accusation should lead to an investigation, not an arrest. If the investigation finds there is evidence a rape occurred, then an arrest would occur. Accusations can’t be used as evidence. I can accuse anyone of stealing my money, that doesn’t mean he’s going to be immoderately arrested unless an investigation finds evidence. Why is rape any different?
/r/MensRights02/02/18 03:32 AM
5

Han Solo passed through the deflector shield in TFA by traveling light speed through it. Star Wars fucked itself.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/17 04:19 AM
4

I’m sorry you thought I was commenting on your appearance, the photography and lighting are stunning, can you provide a referral? What I’ve learned from this circus is acknowledging or apologizing for any wrong doing is only viewed as an admission of guilt. Look at the current examples, Kevin Spacey, I’m sorry, you’re fired. Al Franken, I’m sorry, you’re fired. Weinstein, I’m sorry, you’re fired. Deny and lay low seems to be the most effective strategy.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 05:44 PM
21

I would expect her to be more sympathetic to men, considering she clearly used to be one.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/17 03:25 PM
-21

It’s like when guys are sexually frustrated by a few sexy women, so they ironically call all women sluts and whores. It’s irony so it can’t be wrong, right? I mean, Hitler was just being ironic when he wanted to kill all the Jews, how was he to know that people were actually going to follow his orders?
/r/MensRights04/12/17 03:38 PM
5

Fewer men are interested in having kids because there is no respect for fatherhood. All they have to do is look around and see all the focus is on strong single moms who don’t need no help from the baby daddy except the child support check. That’s how our legal system has defined fatherhood for men. There is no “tender years” doctrine for men, no “primary caregiver” role given to men. You may as well ask him to borrow some sperm and $1,000/ month for the next 18 years and see how excited he is f…
/r/RedPillWomen01/12/17 03:13 AM
1

The degree of double think almost guarantees the movement’s eventual extinction, because believing everyone is a victim means anyone can be a victim. So, while female sexuality should be explored and glorified as her own personal choice, male sexuality should be publicly shamed by strangers. But if that male decides to identify as female, she’s back to being able to express her sexuality privately. But if she wants to stand up for women’s rights, having never menstruated, or been indoctrinated b…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 09:44 PM
3

So, fathers need informed consent from their wives to stay in their own home now. That’s telling.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 08:09 PM
3

A crime a a crime, regardless of the motivation or emotional state of the criminal. Why should we care if he killed her because he hates her or he killed her because he loved her? What we end up saying is that killing a man isn’t as serious as killing a woman.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 05:54 PM
4

Absolutely, polygamy is just a girl’s way of defining relationships in a way that doesn’t make her seem like such a huge slut for fucking multiple guys/ girls. Red Pillers don’t define relationships. That’s a girl thing. A guy who sleeps with multiple women is a player, there is no reference to the type of relationship he’s in with these women, because he doesn’t need to define a relationship with her to have sex with her. She gives it to him for free. A guy who sleeps with multiple women in a p…
/r/askTRP15/11/17 03:13 PM
338

It is not men who sabotage women and stump their career growth – it is women themselves! This owner gets it.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 03:02 PM
162

She really should be celebrating these goddesses who are courageous enough to eat, pray, love with absolutely no life plans, instead of slaving away for the Man. Which in this case is her. A real feminist would fire all the women so they can stay at home, supported by their father/ boyfriend/ husband while she finds herself to be the princess goddess that she truly is.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 02:50 PM
2

I remember men being educated about these precautions long ago, to reduce the appearance of misconduct and the risk of false accusations. I agree this is great for men if women start avoiding them. It would also be great if women stopped bitching about being attractive, and bragging about their harassment as proof they’re desirable. If it’s too much for them, just eat more office donuts and wear pantsuits at work. This whole harassment issue disappears.
/r/askTRP14/11/17 07:58 PM
18

The difference is that feminists had to shut down Milo’s show because people wanted to see it, and they had to cancel Clementine’s show because nobody wanted to see it.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 02:53 PM
209

I don’t think there’s a better way to show men and boys have challenges that aren’t being acknowledged, respected, or addressed than by announcing a day for it and watching everyone come out to bash it.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:57 PM
1

I think those are all good points. Ex spouses are entitled to unemployment like everyone else, and severance packages are generally limited to 6-18 months, depending on the situation. Severance packages are not available to employees who quit their job. A spouse who leaves the marriage to pursue the pool boy/girl can’t possibly expect alimony in a fair world. Both of those would be huge improvements to the current alimony system. No one has to consider the risk of anything bad happening, but it’…
/r/MensRights09/11/17 03:45 PM
1

And Robin Williams.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 10:59 PM
3

I add value at my job, yet if they fire me, or I leave them, all obligations stop. A stay at home spouse needs to consider these same risks and mitigate them. That can mean contributing to an IRA, or setting aside savings in their name only to make it through any “jobless” period.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 10:39 PM
2

What’s amazing is that they’ve convinced the world of an invisible and inherent racism and sexism that can only be corrected by a visible and explicit racism and sexism. It will be their own undoing, as merit will make its own path forward, and they will be diverse but left behind.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 05:13 AM
9

Women argue, men negotiate. Arguing is an emotional endeavor. You should never argue with a woman because by definition you are displaying a lack of control of your emotions and are losing your frame. That doesn’t mean you don’t engage in productive discussions with a woman. But you must enforce that discussion happen from a rational frame, not an emotional one.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/17 03:33 PM
2

I wonder what she considers harassing behavior. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jenny-mccarthy-steven-seagal-told-me-to-strip-during-casting-call-for-under-siege-2/ At least Segal he’s the courtesy to ask for consent.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 04:44 PM
4

The reason is because 30 year old guys are surrounded by 20 year old girls who don’t want to settle down. Then they become 40 year old guys that 30 year old girls are begging to settle down with.
/r/RedPillWomen29/10/17 01:48 PM
2

If she's been fully cooperative with your questions, instead of getting diffusive and gas lighting you, it's not a complete loss. You let her go on this bachelorette party, so take some of the responsibility that she may have had to communicate with guys. If you completely bitch out with jealously, you're not even going to have a plate anymore. You've got to trust but verify, especially if you're trusting her enough to propose. If she lets you verify, there might be nothing there. Girls with som…
/r/askTRP23/10/17 10:04 PM
2

You might even find the stupidest gifts grow on you over time. A bathrobe you don’t use much will last a long time, and you’ll be able to look back eventually about how cute your husband was trying to please you even when he didn’t know what he was doing. Besides, now you can get the exact silk robe you want, and not have any guilt in a few years when you want to update the fashion style.
/r/RedPillWomen20/10/17 03:15 PM
2

That’s great then, use that as an advantage over society at large, which has turned it into a secular business partnership. Marriage certainly isn’t about putting up with your partner, it’s about learning how to love someone even when times are bad. If you can’t give love unconditionally, how can you expect to receive love unconditionally?
/r/RedPillWomen20/10/17 03:03 PM
5

There’s no such thing as a wrong gift. The whole point is that it’s a surprise that he picked out for you. Otherwise it’s just you borrowing his credit card and having him run to the store to pick up what you bought for yourself. The gracious thing to do is to throw out your old robe and think of him every time you put on your new one.
/r/RedPillWomen20/10/17 02:18 PM
2

In marriage, men and women seem to worry about different things. Men worry that they will never find a woman to marry, women worry that they will never find the right man to marry. So when a man and woman get married, the man’s concerns are over, and he relaxes. But a woman’s concern never really goes away, because even though she’s now married, there’s no way to prove she found the right man. I see so many posts where the woman is less than a year into the marriage, after years of dating, and s…
/r/RedPillWomen20/10/17 02:13 PM
12

A 40 year old guy who fucks around is increasing his pool of women to choose from. A 40 year old woman who fucks around is decreasing her pool of men who will choose her. Whores and incels don’t understand this and wonder why their path doesn’t lead to true romance. But being attractive enough to have sex for a guy is hard, not having sex for a woman should be easy.
/r/RedPillWomen07/10/17 03:02 PM
6

I only date women who are smarter than me, said no man ever. Women are getting the to the social heights of men, only to find out how lonely it is at the top when you ignore everyone beneath you.
/r/RedPillWomen30/09/17 07:53 PM
1

Usually you can post bail and go on with your life until the time of the trial.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 08:00 PM
2

So, cooks and cleaners were never well paid jobs, even when men did them. When men returned, women chose to give up those poor paying jobs to be at home for their husbands and to raise children, which seems like a financially sound decision to make. I don’t think so few men take time off to be with their kids because it makes it difficult to get promotions. I think men are expected to get promotions, so their wives can be home with the kids. Therefore, men don’t have the luxury of taking time of…
/r/MensRights24/09/17 02:22 AM
10

I think the point is that 100 years ago, all careers were male careers. So when given the opportunity to pursue their own careers, why did women choose the ones that were traditionally paid less? These were low paying careers even when they were dominated by men, so don’t bring gender into it just to label it sexist.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 09:49 PM
2

Relationships are a challenge, which a lot of people know, but don't fully understand. It really isn't about vetting properly, although that helps. Vetting suggests that there is a perfect guy out there that will pass all the tests and is therefore worthy of a relationship with you. There is no such guy. The challenge of a relationship is if you can adapt and change and improve to build a better relationship. The challenge is if you can stop looking at a relationship as a competition. The challe…
/r/RedPillWomen12/09/17 04:40 PM
8

And who takes the pill in order to make sex cheap? It's not men.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/17 08:39 PM
7

By his argument, if sex is cheap it's the fault of the gatekeepers of sex falling asleep on the watch, not the men who take advantage of the deal offered. Men are becoming more discerning gatekeepers to marriage, while women are leaving the gate open to get drunk at girls nights out.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/17 08:38 PM
3

Not going to jump to conclusions, but I'm sure she ejected the husband from the family years ago.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 01:46 AM
1

We can't portray autistic males as sexist because that creates ambiguity whether sexist men are sexist or autistic. Instead we should show more successful autistic women, to prove that autistic males are just sexists hiding behind autism.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 08:37 PM
3

Too bad she deleted the post, there were a lot of lessons there. But you summed it up with "you have to be the right partner". No one is on TRP saying just wait around for the right girl/ guy to come around. The advice is always to improve yourself, not to be more picky. When someone says I want a captain, I always assume she means I want someone to lead me where I want to go. Nobody is interested in that job. She should be saying that she wants to submit to a man's leadership and support his go…
/r/RedPillWomen18/07/17 12:32 AM
7

Let's be real. The issue isn't you not vetting enough, it's you not passing men's vetting for serious relationships. Independent women who don't want to be alone are ruining marriage. You have a good life and you want a man to make it better. But in order to find the man you're looking for, you must find him and make his life better. My guess is that you want a guy to watch Netflix with, but don't want to pick up after. You want a guy to show off at parties, but don't want to do his laundry. You…
/r/RedPillWomen17/07/17 03:36 PM
12

And the other 1 time the guy is hit with a sexual assault charge, or has the shit beaten out of him by a herd of white knights. She cheated, and the reason women promote rape culture is to get away with cheating. As soon as you let her make it up to you with good behavior, you've put a price on your self respect. She'll understand that she can cheat on you, as long as she gives you 10 BJs payment.
/r/askTRP17/07/17 03:07 PM
9

Only trashy women would be offended by that statement.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 09:33 PM
4

You're telling me a woman gets paid less than a man just because she works less hours? Even if they're both cashiers, doing the exact same job? Sexism!
/r/MensRights10/07/17 10:48 PM
20

Why does the solution to so many women's problems start with Men having to step up and do something for women? When are they going to be grown up enough to start solving their own problems? This woman actually believes if some man would take care of this single mom's kids the wage gap would disappear. But only because after seeing how hard her life was he would fight for her to have more flexible hours. Which she already has at the company the journalist is bashing. I actually got lost in my own…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 10:45 PM
1

Depends on what your gf considers fun, a museum, park, bike ride, coffee, window shopping. All of these are fun. The thing about bars and clubs is that girls will get hit on, it's not under their control. A good looking confident guy comes up to them and compliments them. What's wrong with that? He buys her a drink. He talks to her, what's wrong with that? He buys her a drink. He dances with her and her friends, what's wrong with that? He buys her a drink. She's drunk and he gives her a ride hom…
/r/askTRP10/07/17 02:58 PM
2

And the other 100% of the time she fucks the relationship.
/r/askTRP10/07/17 02:42 PM
1

I think you're on to something, her friend knows OP put his foot down on the last visit, and wants to break them up for a mutual friend.
/r/askTRP10/07/17 02:31 PM
1

What happens when her BFF's girlfriend cancels last minute and she ends up spit roasted by an open fire?
/r/askTRP10/07/17 02:29 PM
9

You have it right, but I would turn it around. The girl may have reservations about her boyfriend, but if he asked she would say yes, see how it goes, and then divorce rape him if it gets tough. Not many girls see a husband as any less disposable than a boyfriend, but they get breakup cash and prizes. So the issue is their boyfriends really don't see them as marriage material, and never move forward with a proposal. That's the key piece that all these whining girls miss. It doesn't matter what y…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/17 03:33 PM
8

It did, but only when it was socially and religiously enforced.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/17 03:21 PM
2

After he gets there, she might wonder the why he couldn't find someone closer and suddenly lose attraction. Sounds like a frustrating waste of time. Especially when so many girls just want to see if you would drive out for her ego, then ghosts/ "loses her phone" once you get there.
/r/askTRP05/07/17 03:16 PM
9

The issue I have with it is that she has no expectation of giving anything in return. If she felt obligated to cook dinner for her boyfriend the same way she expects him to pay for dinner, then no issue. But instead she's told she shouldn't feel obligated to anything if someone does something for her. Which is the same argument of the con artist who claims he didn't steal anything, it was all given to him on their own free will.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 10:15 PM
1

It's more helpful to think of these classifications as qualities, and not individuals: Alpha qualities: Confidence, Powerful, Popular If that was all he was made up of, he would come off as a pompous asshole unfit for a meaningful relationship. So you look for other qualities to create a well rounded, thoughtful, caring captain. The mix you desire depends on what's available and what you can attract. Sometimes we label a person by their most dominant qualities, but a man needs all of these to cr…
/r/RedPillWomen22/06/17 12:43 PM
6

Once you acknowledge that getting sparse communication makes you sad, then you can work to solve the root cause, rather than the symptom. The problem isn't that he doesn't call you enough, from his view he calls you the exact right amount of times. The problem is that he doesn't call you as much as you want. And not getting what you want makes you sad. So in this case, trying to control your emotions would be more productive than trying to control your boyfriend. Understand your feelings, and th…
/r/RedPillWomen16/06/17 08:36 PM
11

Budgeting. Most men and women don't do it right, which leads to these resentments. On top of that many men feel self conscious about not making enough money, because they know income is as important to their dating prospects as bra size is for women. So men can have a hard time communicating that they can't really afford something. They're wearing a padded bra on their wallet, trying to show off at expensive places but feeling guilty about not really being able to afford it. So then comes this e…
/r/RedPillWomen11/06/17 02:19 PM
11

The view that men don't care about what they are giving up is what is so offensive. They know what they are giving up and they do it anyway, despite the consequences that it gets held against them in family court to give the mom alimony and custody. Women know what they are giving up when they quit their career to raise a family, but it's not held against them since the man will be held accountable for supporting her. There is no need for her to be grateful because she could just leave him and h…
/r/RedPillWomen03/06/17 08:31 PM
14

What's weird is that she has pity for women who choose to have a career and are unable to attain a desired work life balance, but she has no pity for men who choose to have a career that doesn't allow them to have a desired work life balance. There's no such thing as balancing a full time job with family because family is a full time job. Women used to understand this before they stopped trusting men to do their job and decided they needed their own careers. Imagine if a woman could invest as mu…
/r/RedPillWomen03/06/17 07:46 PM
6

Custody and guaranteed income. Don't forget the money.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 04:06 PM
4

Great job finding a communication method that puts both of you in control. Inspiring report!
/r/RedPillWomen16/05/17 10:59 PM
5

One mental change you will find as you pursue the sidebar and the philosophy is how to enjoy the journey. Looking for deep connection is the destination, and by focusing on that you never find a way to get there. With TRP mentality you can learn to enjoy the journey, work on yourself, have fun dating women without looking for the one, and one day you might get to that destination. But you'll be so satisfied with yourself it really won't even matter if you don't.
/r/askTRP15/05/17 01:44 AM
-6

IANAL, but he should be able to rape her freely now on account of double jeopardy. He can't be tried for the same crime. In this case I imagine he wouldn't want to, though. There's a /jk in there somewhere.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:28 AM
1

Yes, she handled the situation gracefully.
/r/RedPillWomen14/05/17 04:38 AM
0

😂😂😂I emoji too! Bye.
/r/RedPillWomen14/05/17 01:18 AM
-1

I see I have activated your defense mechanism with my harsh criticism. I still hope you will consider that you should accept responsibility for your situation instead of blame your husband and then pat yourself on the back for not yelling at him, even though he still admits that your passive response is even more hurtful. It seems though, that nothing is your fault. I have to work, I have to be with my family five nights a week, baby has to have a schedule, I have to sleep. When your expectation…
/r/RedPillWomen14/05/17 01:04 AM
0

I'm going to provide you with some context to help you see a deeper reality to your situation. First of all, it's great that you didn't nag your husband, that really shows some self control. Now let's a critical look at Mr. Dunham's perspective and try to understand what he might be thinking or feeling: "I want a good home-life balance. I choose to work part time to maintain a lifestyle above what my husband provides. I choose the hours I work. It's a sweet deal, I pick and choose what I want. H…
/r/RedPillWomen13/05/17 07:54 PM
33

Not only is she saying that men can't experience sexism, she also seems to be saying that women can't not experience sexism. I am woman, therefore I am oppressed and you are man, therefore you are the oppressor seems pretty sexist on both sides.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 06:21 PM
2

Something you said just clicked in. Red pill tools can't change a whore into a housewife. But they can help the man see the difference between the two and select based on what he wants. The idea that some blue pill is going to game his oneitis into an LTR is flawed because she might just be a whore who's only good for banging and no game can make her good at LTRs. Also, gaming a girl into bed is much easier because it requires little to no effort on her part. Gaming her into an LTR is difficult …
/r/askTRP06/05/17 03:53 PM
1

Mad men might be better than house of cards. In the last couple of seasons of house of cards the wife gets fed up in her role and decides she wants the power in the relationship and is prepared to destroy everything to get her way. It was a total 180 and didn't even fit with the show. Some SJW must have taken over. Game of Thrones is following a similar path, where it starts with strong men, and then decides let's put all the women in charge and see what happens.
/r/RedPillWomen02/05/17 08:10 PM
3

Who's to say what she gave up? Not having to work during the marriage, and being financially supported by another person the whole marriage sounds like a benefit to me, not a cost. Think of all the money she cost him by not working. Who's to say how she boosted his career? All we know is that she didn't work. It doesn't say she was organizing his calendar or proof reading his reports with all that free time she had.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 09:19 PM
1

I lost a huge career choice when I chose not to play college basketball. Now I'm over 50, who the fuck owes me my money from the NBA career I could have had? You should know from the redpill, nobody owes you shit.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 09:07 PM
2

That was one of the best advertisements I've seen for TRP. I'll support anyone bringing this truth into the public sphere of discussion. Why the hell isn't anyone else running for public office around here?
/r/TheRedPill26/04/17 04:15 AM
53

I always thought the only reasonable options were leave the seat up or put the lid down. Leave it to women to find a third way where the man lifts and closes the seat and the woman does nothing. Also, the consequences of the man not lifting the seat at all are worse than the man not putting it down. Would you rather put the seat down yourself or clean urine off of it?
/r/MensRights26/04/17 03:37 AM
17

Sexist men don't want to live inequality. That sounds about right.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 03:23 AM
2

You had better make damn sure you train that behavior out of her before marriage. After that she has a free pass to be as big of a bitch as she wants because it will cost you thousands of dollars to walk out that door and she knows it. Soft next, and continue ignoring her completely for a few days after each one of these episodes. If she can't learn to control herself, you need to move on and not resign to a life with her.
/r/askTRP19/04/17 01:16 PM
4

Bro, it doesn't say that he maliciously withheld plans for an IPO, or anything about the people in this forum hating women. And even so, there was no way he could know if his company would decide to pursue it, would be allowed to pursue it, or how the market would value it. Even if he disclosed that they were definitely taking the company public in 2 years, that wouldn't have changed the valuation which is based on prior year balance sheets and tax filings. If I buy my ex out of the marital home…
/r/MensRights05/04/17 08:35 PM
6

Most people are saying leave. If you want to stay, approach this as a hobby of his and put aside your moral feelings. He hides it from you because he knows you don't like it. But he's not willing to stop it because you say so. Nor is it your responsibility to tell him what he can and can't do. So be interested in what your partner is interested in. Try to understand your partner instead of police him. What is it about sexting that he likes? Are their roles that you can fill that he needs, like s…
/r/RedPillWomen05/04/17 07:04 PM
11

It was equally their property until the divorce. After the divorce it became his property. And now his property is worth 93m. Educate yourself before making accusations about others.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 06:41 PM
49

The current value of his stake in the company would have been known and disclosed legally in the case. What wasn't and couldn't be known, is that value would grow over the next 2 years to 93 mil at the time of the IPO. It's like she got 50% of his stake in 2007 APPL and sold it, and is pissed because he kept his shares now they're worth 1,000x more. So she is asking to profit from that growth that his investments saw after the divorce was final.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 06:29 PM
17

The concept of marriage has changed drastically over time. It used to be that people built a fence around their relationship where they planted seeds of love and nurtured it carefully in their own garden, through rain and shine. Now it seems, people wander around and when they find a flower of love already in bloom, they build their fence around it and call it marriage. But they have no idea how to take care of that flower, the efforts and its needs. And so the success of their marriage is based…
/r/RedPillWomen04/04/17 11:15 PM
5

Unfortunately, it's not as easy as divorcing the woman you love because she doesn't have a job. Interesting perspective though, since once she's quit her job, and the husband goes to divorce her for not having a job, she still doesn't have a job and will be awarded alimony just the same. So how does that improve the husband's situation exactly?
/r/RedPillWomen03/04/17 09:36 PM
4

The problem is, I can't force my wife to go to work. If we get married and she quits her job even without kids, there's nothing I can do about that. If five years later she wants a divorce for no fault, there's nothing I can do about that. If she realizes she will have to go back to work at the same or lower level that she left and decides she wants alimony, there's nothing I can do about that. You're making it sound like alimony equalizes injustices that were done to the woman, when in reality …
/r/RedPillWomen03/04/17 05:23 AM
16

But she's already married. There is no downside to her getting fat anymore. If he leaves her she still gets years of his money.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 06:50 AM
4

Maybe that has something to do with it. You hung around taking care of her all week and she found that repulsive. A similar thing happened with my ex. You think you're being a nice guy but you're also drying up her vagina.
/r/askTRP21/03/17 03:24 AM
2

There's always going to be a guy more shredded than you, taller than you, and better game than you. And your woman is going to notice these guys too, just as a hot girl stands out to you. Maybe men are less likely to stray because "principles", or maybe because it's way more effort. The point is that you can make a choice not to, and you should only commit to a woman who you also trust not to. If you think your girlfriend would be on her knees if Chad walked in and snapped his fingers, either yo…
/r/askTRP20/03/17 02:48 PM
6

It's possible that the false rape accusation itself is a cry for help and attention from a person with severe depression or other mental illness. Perhaps in their depression they want to take down somebody who didn't love them and who they blame for all their misfortune. Suicide is generally not a rational decision made by someone thinking, "I have to face my rapist in court? Guess I'll just use the old kill myself loophole."
/r/MensRights19/03/17 07:18 PM
1

There's no judgement from this group, a lot of us out speaking from our own experience, going through the same thing you are.
/r/askTRP18/03/17 11:45 PM
4

That 200,000 years of evolution is because the guys who didn't care if their mate went to see a guy friend ended up without children, raising her guy friend's kid as their own. The guys that did care passed that gut feeling into their own kids. OP needs to take precautions here that is gut is telling him, things he shouldn't have to do if he's promoting the right girl to LTR. My guess is she wasn't vetted nearly enough, that this surprise comes out 10 months in. If she does hook up with him, she…
/r/askTRP18/03/17 03:27 PM
1

Or asked if he wanted to drive into the city together.
/r/askTRP18/03/17 02:35 PM
0

Obviously the males were criminals and the women were innocent victims. No way their attacks could be criminally related. It's more anti muslim than feminism, but from the statistics it should be anti gang. How did Islam even come up? Assuming all female attackers were Muslim just like all male attackers were gang members?
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:18 PM
15

And it worked because it makes them feel like little girls.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 05:23 PM
11

So when women shave their legs and do their make up to appear as young as possible, they are not catering to a perceived male sexual fantasy, but to their own emotional fantasy of being child like, innocent, and protected. This explains so much, like how even feminists who externally hate men can't help their own internal desire to present themselves as children to be taken care of.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 05:01 PM
4

Check out Dalrock. He writes about red pill ideas from a Christian perspective.
/r/askTRP01/03/17 03:44 AM
26

That's great to hear the changes you've tried and the results you've seen. I want to encourage you to keep it up. It's possible the past nagging has really taken a toll on him. I would never pass up any breakfast burritos offered, so it occurred to me he may be afraid of a covert contract, that something would then be expected of him if you did something nice. Give him time to accept your new mentality and for him to trust it's coming from a good place. With patience you'll see him take more res…
/r/RedPillWomen24/02/17 03:42 AM
10

Bias as in institutionalized racism.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 03:20 AM
1

I mean that to the woman who has had a lot of cocks, men become commodities, easily replacing one for another. This makes it especially difficult for her to form a strong relationship because she sees no value in one man over another, they're commodities to her.
/r/RedPillWomen22/02/17 09:03 PM
3

Just because she gets paid for it doesn't mean she doesn't suffer the negative effects of the cock carousel, the alpha widow, inability to pair bond, commoditization of men, that deeply impact her ability to have a happy family home. Women are really screwing up their lives by sleeping with a lot of men and thinking, it's OK, it's healthy, I should be getting this out of my system, this will make me a better lover for my future husband, maybe this guy will work out, I can stop once I get married…
/r/RedPillWomen22/02/17 02:11 PM
13

I wonder if she's self aware enough to know "be with you forever" really means lifetime alimony, child support, and genetically tied to your kids while screwing other guys. Sounds great for the nice guy, doesn't it?
/r/TheRedPill22/02/17 02:00 PM
4

The thesis of the paper appears to be: 1. Male nerds are screaming to be heard 2. Being ignored, they gather in alt right online communities 3. Any gathering of men eventually erupts in violence 4. We must ignore male nerds harder and eradicate their gathering places Good luck with that strategy.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 12:21 AM
3

It occurs to me that feminist literature has no problem assuming the truth that men are naturally stronger and more aggressive(men's fault from nature). But turn it around and they will quickly tell you that society teaches women to be weaker and more submissive(men's fault from nurture). So, women are not naturally weaker even though men are naturally stronger. It's amazing how well the feminist argument can perform acrobatics to be so subversively and subtly bigoted.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 12:12 AM
16

That's how I really feel about this article. I don't know him, but I know he's not a neo nazi. He knows he's not a neo nazi. Millions of YouTube followers know he is not a neo nazi. So the backlash is only going to go against the ones making baseless, uninformed accusations. And we're seeing a more conservative millennial generation exactly because of this. I have a feeling that media is apolitical, and when the money dries up from the left, we'll see it switch over to crap like this from the ri…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 05:25 PM
9

I totally agree, but I got tricked into it because this was a featured headline in the iOS news app. Which is more aggravating in it's way.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 05:14 PM
1

If it's for overflow, and women take longer, then why not have both M&W? Then neither sex has to wait while there's an empty toilet. It's just more feminist, what's mine is mine and what's yours is ours, thinking.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 05:13 PM
1

This is exactly why feminism just can't seem to win. No matter what they do, some man, some where, will get off on it. They get to a door and have no idea if they should open it for the man, or wait for him to open it for her. As her brain fries trying to determine which is less oppressive, a man walks through the door and nails the interview to land the job.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 05:05 PM
3

For women with lower sex drives and a victimization complex about not having power or control in society, it's absolutely about having power and control over their victim. Sex is just the tool they use to get and retain that power over them. Look at their defenses and you will always see them reaching for that victim of men card. If it's not current abuse it's past abuse. So, while she claims what she had with her victim is special, what she really means is that she liked having the power and co…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:47 PM
1

It's a pretty good analogy, though. Feminists come out with accusations and attacks on men's rights and everything is OK. But if men fight back, all of a sudden it's, "Oh my misogyny!"
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:35 PM
2

She doesn't get the joke? Let me explain it to her. The joke is that this guy can spend thirty minutes spray paining a slogan that you don't like on a van. And you will spend hours of your life thinking, writing, and taking offense to it. You think the joke is what he wrote, but you can't even see the joke. The irony here is that you're getting paid to write an article bringing attention to the very thing you're unhappy about. I never would have ever heard of this person and his vans, except tha…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:25 PM
1

The irony is that all those western feminists have a platform because men set up western governments to allow them those freedoms. Never in history have women held so much power and never in history have they rallied under the banner of kill all men.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:04 PM
20

Haven't men been told by feminists not to intrude on their fight? That their role was to sit down, shut up, and listen?
/r/MensRights17/02/17 02:29 AM
2

That must be funny because suicide rates are highest among mediocre white men. So essentially the joke must be telling these women to go shoot themselves. Ha. Ha. Ha.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 06:14 AM
0

Feminists who majored in women's studies, fighting for more scholarships for all the female engineers that don't exist. They're really a sexist bunch, because their funding depends on the existence of sexism.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 03:32 PM
3

The only thing stopping a woman from pursuing engineering today is her aptitude in math. That's always been true, we have had women engineers in the prefeminist past. It's just in the old days, more women recognized all the advantages of being female and raising her children while be supported by her husband, so why would they ditch that sweet gig just to be a middle level cog in a corporate machine?
/r/MensRights11/02/17 03:25 PM
1

No, that wasn't the logic I was using. I was stating that men don't have to quit their jobs to get married because nature and society tell men they must have jobs to support their family. These are good, altruistic reasons for men to pursue careers. However, nature, society, and you tell women that they must have jobs to support themselves, because you say men will be corrupted by the financial power they hold over their wife. Very strange mindset for a RP forum. WOMEN, go get careers because th…
/r/RedPillWomen09/02/17 09:29 PM
4

A man pursues a career to attract a woman. A woman pursues a career to replace a man. Feminists never tried to hide this, they didn't tell women to get a career to be a better partner, to learn teamwork and compromise, to provide for their husbands and kids. They were told to get a career because women shouldn't depend on a man and she should take care of herself. If you put your relationship in the backseat to anything, you don't have a real partnership. You have something that's convenient for…
/r/RedPillWomen08/02/17 07:05 PM
5

Actually, I became rather accustomed to no blow jobs and infrequent sex. I wouldn't take that deal.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 07:00 AM
2

Red Pill is a mindset, not a physical characteristic like an under wear model body or a large dick. So your morbidly fat, do you prioritize going to the gym for your own enjoyment? Do you attack your job working your ass off for a promotion? Are you in the moment at parties, always having a great time and helping others have fun as well? Red Pill is about putting the oxygen mask on yourself first, before you worry about others.
/r/askTRP01/02/17 02:13 PM
4

Mothers are the greatest shit testers of them all. She's throwing tantrums before she moves in, it's only going down hill.
/r/askTRP27/01/17 04:20 PM
5

I have no studies to back this up, but it seems to me, male relationship satisfaction is much more binary, sex yes or sex no. And they are attracted to a wider attractiveness of women. This makes it less likely for a man to stray only based on attractiveness. Women are attracted to stability, security which is a much more subjective spectrum. And they have a much more narrow view of attractiveness. This causes them to constantly assess their mate's subjective stability, and allows competitors an…
/r/RedPillWomen23/01/17 07:55 PM
7

Look at how quickly the feminist movement, the civil rights movement, the LGBT movement all devolved into identity politics after they achieved their goals of equal legal rights. They've been completely neutered and ineffective since then. They've focused around defining their own group and what special rights their group should have over others. The liberal elites don't care how many women board members there are at the company, they own the companies. The actual outcomes have been to halve the…
/r/TheRedPill22/01/17 04:40 PM
4

That lucky male murder victim. Never having to know how much that female victim of sexual assault suffers. Another sure sign of the male privilege. u/LandMineHare got the right reason society does it, you got the right reason feminists think they deserve it. For everything men in society do for women, women have a reason why they deserve it and don't have to be grateful.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 01:17 PM
9

But why don't we have a murderer registry, surely murder is worse than rape?
/r/MensRights20/01/17 02:20 AM
3

I really enjoyed this post. I like the way you relate sexual tension to a natural innate part of human nature. It's what keeps the population growing! It naturally grows for people in the situations you describe unless something happens to counter it. It doesn't make them bad people, or your boyfriend jealous to recognize sexual tension naturally rises in certain situations. It's not even about trust, it's about human nature. Fortunately for men, we have a built in lever for decreasing our sexua…
/r/RedPillWomen18/01/17 03:29 PM
2

Referring to a woman as a wife, or anything other than a super awesome wonderful perfect warrior of strength and beauty, is condescending.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 09:56 PM
2

I believe that you've lost him and there is no chance. But look at that as a positive, he is not a good fit for you. He is most likely in the anger faze of TRP, recovering from a deep betrayal. If he is lucky, he's focusing on having sex and improving himself. You were probably a convenient target, but that age gap makes it unlikely he will settle down with you. There are just too many younger women looking for what he's got. He's not ready to be the leader you want, and you're not ready to put …
/r/RedPillWomen11/01/17 02:54 PM
3

There's no problem with keeping a plate warm, as long as she doesn't interfere with your having sex with other girls. She makes other girls compete for your time, and they make her jealous. Maybe she comes around, maybe not. But don't pin your hopes on her.
/r/askTRP11/01/17 06:39 AM
2

1) Women don't have to marry anymore because they prefer to make their own living and choose to make their own life choices. Compromise is hard. 2) Traditionally minded men have more difficulty marrying nowadays because their are very few women that are worth the 50% chance of divorce. 2 of 3 that are initiated by the wife. 3) It's considered prude or old-fashioned to live apart until marriage, and nowadays if you follow this rule you are a specific kind of religion, and if you're not, people th…
/r/RedPillWomen11/01/17 06:07 AM
11

I find it interesting that their recommendations are about finding the best partner, not about being the best partner. I'm guessing the majority of the group is women. I think that's a huge part of the difficulty of marriage, it's not about your partner. If I were to ask you how I could be the best tennis player, would your advice be to make sure I play a lot of losers, or to practice my own skills? I think you would be successful if you could redirect the conversation from positioning yourself …
/r/RedPillWomen05/01/17 10:56 PM
9

A man has never needed a woman to take care of the home in order to pursue a career. That whole home maker deserves credit is pure bull shit. You think any guy ever is thinking he could have gotten that promotion if only his shitty apartment had been vacuumed? It's always been about women being unable to take care of themselves, even today.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 11:08 PM
3

Actually, there's not even any evidence that she had sex with him for that money.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 11:03 PM
22

Yes.
/r/RedPillWomen02/12/16 03:43 AM
2

Exactly, focus on the desired outcomes for long term happiness of individuals based on biological differences. If men want sex, don't act like a blue pill beta submissive. If women want commitment, don't act like a harpy hypergamous shrew. Those things lead to loneliness.
/r/RedPillWomen30/11/16 07:15 PM
2

Hypergamy lacks several points that she mentions: Satisfaction and confidence that she has found the best value, instead of unsatisfying grass is always greener hypergamy. A recognition of the value that the woman brings to the relationship, instead of take what I can get hypergamy. An expectation that the woman contributes to the overall success of the relationship with her attitude and behavior, instead of the entertain me mindset of hypergamy. RWP recognize the value of choosing a captain and…
/r/RedPillWomen30/11/16 07:07 PM
21

There is a difference in what he said, every man is at risk of divorce rape, and what you're saying, that every man is a potential rapist. Everyone who goes in water is at risk of drowning is not totalitarianism. It's true even though not everyone drowns. To use your rape analogy it's not that all men are potential rapists, but that all women have a risk of being raped, and should be appropriately cautioned of that. Just like men might be cautioned of being mugged when walking alone at night.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 07:38 PM
1

That doodle doesn't even make sense. A bunch of women talking to each other about things they could do while looking at pictures of things men did. Wait, that does make sense.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 03:23 PM
19

She sees the boat, but she doesn't want to admit that it passed her by. The exact ages and differentials vary, but each one reinforces one important point: Women get less valuable as they age, while men just get to enjoy the ride. The conclusion that any rational woman would draw from this point would be to marry the highest value man she can find while her value is at its peak, and enjoy the ride with him. Instead they destroyed the marriage deal, and their independence has created an industry …
/r/TheRedPill19/11/16 03:57 PM
10

It's not even the straight males that are restricted by her standards of what's appropriate, it's really the younger females who want to date older men that are behaving "inappropriately". She absolutely thinks she can control the behavior of young women by controlling and shaming older men. Where is the article teaching young girls about why they shouldn't date older men? That would be victim blaming. When there's just as much of a case to make that these young attractive women are exploiting t…
/r/TheRedPill19/11/16 03:42 PM
3

It's important for men to take responsibility for the relationship without taking the blame. So accusing someone of not being alpha enough to maintain a relationship isn't helpful. Could he have lifted more, made more money, been taller? Absolutely. That doesn't mean he is to blame for losing the girl. He should accept responsibility for what he can improve and do his best to be better next time. TRP is amoral. It's focus is on improving your intersexual power within female relations. That is al…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/16 08:21 PM
11

You got the connection right there. A lot of guys (especially bad boys) think tattoos are hot. A girl gets tattoos so bad boys will think she's hot. She wants guys to think she's hot so she can have lots of sex with them. She wants to have lots of sex with them because she never had a strong daddy to show her how love is displayed outside of sex.
/r/askTRP16/11/16 03:45 PM
5

This is the most practical and polite advice I could imagine. My thoughts were why is this blue pill woman living her blue pill lifestyle, complete with alpha chasing fantasies, unintended pregnancies ending in abortion, and long term career ambitions even posting on redpillwomen? She's worried about this guy's red flags when she carries every major red flag warned about over in TRP. If someone as successful and handsome as she claims is courting her for marriage, it's a no brainer, get married …
/r/RedPillWomen15/11/16 05:31 PM
3

I've seen this before too, and it was also a woman bringing up hypothetical fears and what ifs to overturn sound, thought out policy. Because corporations are naturally risk averse, the tie seems to go to the most hysterical fears.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 02:50 PM
1

Eye contact and a subtle nod from across the room is all Putin expects.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/16 05:56 PM
1

We're not allowed to call ourselves minorities either.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/16 05:42 PM
1

How many people went from deriding Trump for suggesting a rigged election if he loses, to suggesting a rigged election as soon as Hilary loses. Apparently, Russia fixed our election for Trump.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/16 05:31 PM
1

I couldn't even watch her, all she could say was racist sexist white males ruined her party. Their inability to understand the concerns and motivations of white men, and the way they reduce any disagreements to sexism and racism is why they were so surprised by the outcome. And then she doubles down on the rhetoric. This could be the first crack that shows them that reality doesn't work they way they think it does.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/16 05:28 PM
2

Hilary can still get to the white house. She just has to become Trump's 4th wife.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/16 05:20 PM
-2

It's always statutory for the male in today's western society. They have sex, she's resistant, she tells her dad, he's in juvi. TRP is about having sex and being smart. That means pulling 18 and up. Just like sex without protection just isn't worth the risk.
/r/askTRP07/11/16 01:18 PM
0

Wait until you're an adult and have sex with adults. Statutory rape is a game killer. Respect her boundaries and move on if that's not what you want.
/r/askTRP07/11/16 04:55 AM
3

People have kids all the time no nothing of their parents medical history. Just because you have some paranoia about what you might find in your father's medical records doesn't violate his medical privacy. I never had a chance to go through my mother or father's medical records. Why do you believe that to be a right of yours? Your mother wanted sperm and some man was generous enough to give it to her. If you want to be angry with someone, be angry at your selfish mom for denying you the right t…
/r/MensRights06/11/16 09:32 PM
1

Yes, I agree with the attitude you should have in going through a divorce. One bitchy parent is bad, two bitchy parents is worse. But I disagree with the idea that it is a business arrangement because the ex wife gets the benefits of it and the ex husband gets the costs out of it. No one willingly walks into that kind of agreement. The only way that makes sense is if you assume the ex husband deserves to bare the costs of the break up.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 04:34 PM
1

Yes, in my country 50/50 is not 50/50. I pay 50% for the 50% of time I have them, + a portion of the costs while they are with her.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 04:29 PM
0

I never said pay to play. I said if their mother can't afford to provide them with food, clothes, or shelter, I would be able to provide that to them while they are with me. I'm saying that I provide them with all of those costs, including a home, why should I pay for her home when I have no choice over what kind of home she gets? If she buys an expensive home that she can't afford without support from her kids' dad, that was a poor choice on her part. Single parents don't have the same option a…
/r/MensRights30/10/16 04:26 PM
1

Except in a business arrangement their are mutual benefits or there is no agreement. She gets money, she gets time, she jump starts her life. What benefit are you getting out of this arrangement? Just a smug sense of self satisfaction?
/r/MensRights30/10/16 05:36 AM
0

She was compensated for her work as a mother while she was married. Without a husband to pay her salary, she has to get a job like everyone else. Maybe if she had done a better job as wife she wouldn't have been fired. But no one gets compensated for lost opportunity after being fired. Try asking McDonald's for $1,000 a month because you could have gone to college if you weren't working at their shitty store for 10 years.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 05:30 AM
1

Your country is not America. Kids are with me 50% of the time and I still have to pay their mom to take care of her kids.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 05:04 AM
1

If there are benefits to being married it would be logical to assume there are costs to being divorced. If feminism has done anything in the last 30 years, it's to shift those costs to men even as 70% of divorces are filed by women, so that women actually realize a benefit to getting married, and another benefit to getting divorced.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 04:51 AM
1

I help pay to raise them when they're with me. Why should I pay their mom to take care of her kids? Is she a day care service? Want me to spend more on my kids, let them spend more time with me. The idea that kids require a certain amount of money to be raised is flawed. And the idea that one parent can buy love from their kids is flawed.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 04:46 AM
6

We can now add buying your children gifts and paying all the bills to the list of domestic violence. Is there anything a man can do that would objectively never be considered a form of violence against women? I mean, sitting comfortably alone on a train is a potential red flag for a serial abuser.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 08:56 PM
1

And there never were. But with only men being able to own property, and make a living, they had to find a way to stick it out, or die in poverty. Those were the only terms on which marriage could have been considered to work.
/r/askTRP10/10/16 01:39 AM
7

Or he can list it and if she wants it she can make an offer like everyone else. She probably doesn't have money to buy a house, which is why she feels entitled to this one. If he didn't leave it to her in the will, it's not hers.
/r/askTRP29/09/16 10:43 PM
2

A dad only needs one take.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 03:39 AM
2

It sounds like he gave you every opportunity to prove your value as an LTR, but you couldn't put the casual dating scene behind you. You continued to treat him like another one of your boys, instead of your captain. When he saw you talking to a man at the bar it probably dawned on him that you weren't going to change, that you crave male attention, and that he was getting too close to someone who wasn't ready for an LTR. Good luck, maybe eventually you'll be ready for a healthy relationship.
/r/RedPillWomen19/09/16 03:09 AM
11

Certainly what my ex did.
/r/askTRP15/09/16 01:45 AM
3

What will happen though, is more complaining about she needs some help with groceries, rent, utilities, because obviously all her money went to her boobs and you do get that benefit, after all... I would say if her boobs aren't good enough for her, then she's not good enough for you. You don't want the hassle, she's shown you her red flag, whether she gets the surgery or not. Now act on it and move on.
/r/askTRP15/09/16 01:44 AM
2

The thing is, these people base their feelings of gender on terribly out dated, sexist, anti feminist values of sexual stereotypes. Like, if she feels like wearing jeans and having a beer, she must be a boy that day, and if she wants to wear a dress and do her nails, it's a girl day. But in today's society, a woman can wear jeans and drink beer without being a boy. That's what makes this movement so incomprehensible, that they are simultaneously tearing down gender stereotypes by reinforcing gen…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 09:53 PM
9

The man pleads innocent and gets 21 years, the woman pleads guilty and gets 9? Is that how this works?
/r/MensRights03/09/16 02:48 AM
2

I'd like to believe there was something she could do to fix her situation. But I have to believe that he's going through the same thing. In the same way that she is disgusted with him for not being dominant, he's disgusted with her for not being submissive. His libido is gone just like her attention is on other men. It's not like she can flip a feminine switch and suddenly he will be attracted to her again and want to dominate her. Even if she becomes perfectly submissive to his leadership, his …
/r/askTRP31/08/16 02:13 PM
12

That would be like women getting paid $0.013 for every $1.00 a man makes. I'd like to see a study to examine how much a woman makes compared to a man after the economy, government assistance, ex-husbands, and child support are accounted for. Typical feminists take the only example where men have the advantage and ignore the many examples where women have the advantages. For equality.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:01 PM
1

A girl doesn't have to give up sex to get commitment, even though most guys on here are strictly looking for sex. But if she's not looking for a one night stand, and does want commitment, then refusing sex will screen those men out for her. No big deal for her, no big deal for them, they're looking for different things. If she is instead looking for commitment from a man of value, she will have to display value to him. Sex is one of those ways, but then he might confuse her for one of the many s…
/r/askTRP11/08/16 05:12 AM
4

And when you define momentary eye contact as allowing light reflecting off a female to be absorbed by a male's retina.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 04:39 AM
2

We need to institute sexist policies against men because men are never victims of sexism because male privilege allows them to rise above every disadvantage we throw at them.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 04:34 AM
5

Wait, that makes so much sense now.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 04:46 AM
3

I like the suggestion of breaking up when she steps on the plane, no reason no closure. Let her think you've been seeing someone else, and as soon as she dropped the ball another girl was waiting to pick it up. She'll be so anxious to jump the first foreign cock she sees, but she can't take him back home, and she'll be lonely and miserable when she gets back.
/r/askTRP29/07/16 04:18 AM
4

I would absolutely put one time lesbians in the same category. If they have a kink for something I can't deliver ( being female, being black ) then she's not worth my LTR since in all likelihood, she will reach for that when she gets bored. If it's not a kink, then it's not a problem. I wouldn't have a problem with a black girl who banged a black guy because that was around. But a white girl who had to go out of her way to bang a black dude? I foresee trouble.
/r/askTRP27/07/16 10:53 PM
2

Her preference for black guys is not a red flag for her, it's a red flag for him because he is not a black man.
/r/askTRP27/07/16 10:49 PM
8

This right here is a great response. There is a huge difference between a girl who dated a black guy and a girl who dated a guy who happened to be black. Because black men can be fetishized by white women, you need to know if she dated the guy because she found his blackness exciting/ dangerous/ taboo. If she harbors those racial feelings, she will always go back to looking for that excitement she had when she was with her forbidden lover. You will always be white and boring to her, because of h…
/r/askTRP27/07/16 10:30 PM
7

Occam's Razor suggests that he broke up with her, she asked him out for drinks, she followed him home from the bar, she raped him in his own home, and then she sent him to jail for her crime. Or we can believe an entire night orchestrated by her, intended by her to end in sex, magically became rape when his dick touched her mouth. We are at the point when a girl can seduce a man, consent to sex, ask to go down on him, pull down his pants only to see a tiny dick. When she disappointedly puts her …
/r/MensRights27/07/16 02:01 PM
3

If that's what you think of TRP, why do you hang out here? Are you a closeted xenophobic mysogynist? Some of us can read a post about someone's experience and not jump to the racist conclusion that white culture = colored people bad. I can read about Hispanic culture and not think the OP is bashing whites or blacks. The fact that you make that jump shows how racist you are, against whites. Why do your eyes hurt? Because you've never used them before.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/16 12:18 PM
10

Wow, you're really good at reducing our options down to only the Muslim patriarchy. The US had a secular patriarchy for hundreds of years that gave women more rights than they ever had, Christians had a patriarchy that developed chivalry, and was extremely respectful of women. To hold Islam as the only option is to forget all of human history. TRP isn't about controlling women, it's a place for men.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/16 12:38 PM
16

I think this is the most important take away. When you take race out of the argument, I don't care what color the pussy is as long as it submits. I don't care about sustaining a white society, but I would like to see a masculine society. I think TRP would agree with that side of the argument. Our country is living in the feminist frame right now. We need to understand our own frame before we can even begin correcting the societal ills the OP describes within a self destructive feminist society. …
/r/TheRedPill26/07/16 05:01 AM
29

You seem to forget that her sacrifice of "potential lost earnings" is more than balanced out by his "actual lost savings" in the marriage. Think of all the money he could have been putting into retirement if he didn't have to financially support his unemployed wife. When is she going to pay him back for all the money that went to her? In other words, he pays for her choice to stay at home by covering all of the household costs instead of half. But instead of focusing on that real and actual cost…
/r/TheRedPill21/07/16 02:35 PM
6

Nobody cares that women don't like male led super hero action movies, but it turns out men don't like female led romantic comedies because of misogyny.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 11:22 PM
12

I think the fact that they don't change their actions tells you how much they actually fear and care about this "rape culture", not at all. Watch what women do, not what they say. They continue to take so many sexual risks, because we live in the least rapey society in history. 50 years ago you would not have seen the sorority sisters getting black out drunk and knowingly risking a sexual encounter with the fraternity brothers because the consequences were pregnancy, dropping out of school, and …
/r/TheRedPill14/07/16 09:27 PM
1

Under marriage, you're on the hook either way. If it's a joint account, she can fuck your credit score, too.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/16 05:58 PM
1

I get you. This case is so appalling because it is actually consistent with extant case law. The current law is appalling.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 02:50 AM
2

The child is not entitled to the support of both parents. Only when one parent sues the other parent for money to raise their child is the child given that support. Child support only comes up in divorce, therefore it is not an entitlement or some kind of inalienable right of all children as you're suggesting. You say that a stay at home parent can provide care in lieu of money, so why isn't a divorced parent ever sued for care, and ordered to have 50% custody by the court because a parent's car…
/r/MensRights21/06/16 01:50 AM
5

The right to financial support from both parents becomes nonsense once it's implemented in real world cases. The government should not be telling parents how to raise their children. The government is making the case that it's in the kids best interest for parents to be forced to spend money on them. That is ridiculous to suggest the more money spent on a child is causal to raising a better person. There are times when parental responsibilities can and should be removed. This is one. Sometimes a…
/r/MensRights19/06/16 09:24 PM
3

Let's not forget, crazy is literally throwing themselves on his dick. He is surrounded by crazy women who will do anything to get their hands on his money. The crazies crowd out all normal women from his presence. He gets to a point where he accepts that all women are like that, and may have picked her because she seemed the least crazy of them all.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:05 AM
10

Before you say anything to him, remind yourself that NAGGING IS JUST A FORM OF CONTROL. You want your SO to do something that he doesn't want to do. What gives you the right to force him to do something? Do you deserve to order him around because you let him have sex with you? Does he chain you to a broom and force you to clean the floors? You really need to get it in your head that you love this person, but you don't control this person. Your basing your happiness on his willingness to submit t…
/r/RedPillWomen26/05/16 02:21 PM
2

That and the rise of single moms kick out the dads and then have no idea how to handle the energy levels of young boys and choose to medicate it as a problem.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/16 04:10 PM
2

You're probably right. They think the problem keeping women down is that men are too aggressive, when the reason men are successful is because they're so aggressive.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:55 PM
11

And most people would agree, the problem is that feminists wanted to integrate the male groups while keeping the female groups in the name of "equality".
/r/MensRights13/05/16 10:39 PM
3

Good summation. I would say second wave was really about free sex and abortion rights of the 70s. We want what we want without the responsibility or consequences. And a lot of perceived injustice, like why weren't they being paid to be housewives. Am I missing any other accomplishments?
/r/MensRights13/05/16 10:32 PM
6

Same reason a fish can't find a good bicycle.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 10:25 PM
12

Respect needs to come before trust. If she doesn't respect him, it doesn't matter if he trusts her or not, she's going to be willing to put herself in compromising positions that eventually lead to her cheating. And Vegas with her sloot girlfriend is the perfect plausible deniability. Where girls are encouraged to drink as much as they need to be open to one of the many players trying to get in her pants. Next morning it was just an accident because of the drinking and not something she has to t…
/r/askTRP11/05/16 11:19 PM
13

Think about why black male role models are so often criminal/ gang leaders. Because society gives them no legitimate way towards respect as fathers, husbands, or sons. Father? Government takes your kids away. Husband? Wife rewarded with cash for divorcing you. Son? Mom doesn't even know who your father is. If a black man can't build a family, he's going to build something else. White men are only a few decades behind them.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/16 01:28 PM
10

Just a little further and they might reach empathy!
/r/MensRights11/05/16 12:32 PM
19

Exactly, let's see if she can actually root out feminism and create a society that respects men, and then men will naturally defend the civilization without even being asked. It's like when a girl suggests you clean the bathroom while she cleans the kitchen. 15 minutes later the bathroom is done and she's just sitting there watching TV.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 02:18 PM
2

All roads with women lead to a shittier hole. That's why we hold frame and say no, you're not, but I'll let you keep trying.
/r/askTRP10/05/16 01:56 PM
10

I haven't met a woman who can keep up with my sexual appetite. This puts the burden of performance on her if she wants more of your attention.
/r/askTRP10/05/16 04:14 AM
4

And if she isn't sexually attracted to you, she isn't going to change her mind just because you spend $3- $15 on her, so why bother?
/r/askTRP05/05/16 08:12 PM
1

It's nice to have her show a little neediness sometimes. My advice would be to tease her into submission. Outright displays of dominance, demanding she stay put, physically correcting her position, are very easily misinterpreted as overbearing or controlling, which can then inspire more rebellion in her if she's not into it. I think you may have been better off calling out her behavior, "that's not where I left you," making a joke, "I should get my whip to teach you some obedience. Is that what …
/r/askTRP28/04/16 04:57 AM
1

What I've learned from red pill is to trust my gut. I'm still not good at come backs or what to say in the moment. I probably wouldn't have said anything, but it would have left the same question on my mind that prompted you to post. Men aren't great at recognizing when women are taking them because women are such good liars they believe themselves. Until somebody comes along and makes them realize you were holding her back from Chad the whole time. Anyway, you'll recognize when a girl treats yo…
/r/askTRP28/04/16 03:41 AM
0

I don't think you did anything wrong. She did. You asked for something that she wasn't willing to give. Were you not clear in your instructions? Were you gone for 15 minutes? Or was sitting on her hands and knees too much for her to give you? Consciously or not, that was her way of telling you you're not worth it to her, unless you weren't clear or gone more than 2 minutes. I married a girl was was nice and sweet and smart and respectful, but didn't worship me. That ended in divorce. Women are c…
/r/askTRP28/04/16 01:29 AM
7

At a certain point in time about 50 years ago, women decided they didn't want to love their husbands, they wanted to be like their husbands. Men didn't understand this. Why would women want to be in the workplace when they could be creating a loving and nurturing environment at home? Men thought that the only reason they were in the workforce was to provide for their wives so she didn't have to do that. Some women thought expecting women to stay home was sexist. They thought the only reason they…
/r/RedPillWomen28/04/16 01:10 AM
1

Well congratulations, you totally disproved that a woman can't do anything mechanical. All of us here on Reddit would like to reward you with the time you spent destroying that straw man you built for yourself in your backyard, but sadly, those months can never be unwasted. You must have us confused with some sexist woman hating subreddit. We love women, and just want to give them what they want, whether they know what that is or not.
/r/askTRP25/04/16 01:26 AM
2

Are you talking about the generalization that a woman can't change a tire, or the generalization that if she does she sure as hell has to brag about it on social media?
/r/askTRP24/04/16 11:12 PM
3

Monogamy was invented by men for bearing children. It's the only way to ensure your paternity, assuming you find a woman you can trust. Don't expect to cheat the system in place for thousands of years and not end up raising another guy's kids. Enforcing monogamy is your best chance for kids.
/r/askTRP21/04/16 12:20 PM
9

You really need to look into protective orders. If she claims to feel afraid, there is no need for threatening or abusive behavior. That's literally what it's there for, so women can get protection before anything has been done. And you are guilty until proven innocent at some future court date. But how do you prove she's not afraid?
/r/MensRights20/04/16 06:45 PM
-1

Same idea behind raping your wife.
/r/askTRP18/04/16 05:39 PM
3

The premise of the law forgets that men do pay for their children. Just not as much as the woman wants him to. Imagine the government going into a married man's house and telling him that he made so much money he was required to buy his child the brand named sneakers, not the generic knock offs. The father is being told he must spend $X on his children, that they are entitled to it even if he is trying to protect them from being spoiled. Add to that the fact that he's not allowed to spank his ch…
/r/TheRedPill17/04/16 10:05 PM
7

I haven't heard that, but I like it.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/16 09:48 PM
2

I want a woman with some experience but not a whore. I'm currently dating a girl whose virginity I took. So yeah, virgins are worth it. The loyalty and devotion I've had from virgins has been significantly greater than low n girls. I'm not trying to generalize, just sharing my experience. But there are some religious issues, so there's that.
/r/askTRP06/04/16 10:59 PM
3

While those are options, however I have a weakness for having money and living near my kids. A better option, which we see more and more men doing, is freelancing their skills in off the books cash businesses.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/16 03:37 PM
4

No evidence outweighs a woman crying on the stand saying she needs more money. It's appalling, and I think people would be disgusted by the perversion of justice. A man asks a judge to decrease his payments because his income went down, the judge agrees his income went down, and the judge rules that he should now pay more. He could have denied my motion to decrease payments, and allowed her to submit a motion to increase payments, but why wait when a woman says she needs money. How can I ever go…
/r/TheRedPill05/04/16 12:33 PM
6

Only when every father has been through this ringer will we see any change, and even then it will be an uphill battle. I went to court to lower child support because my income decreased. The judge ordered me to pay more in child support because the ex claimed her income went down by more than mine. My lawyer had her bank records showing the money going into her account, and still he took her word that her income was half of what was actually going into her account. Family court is a joke set up …
/r/TheRedPill05/04/16 01:37 AM
3

The list itself is an unfair power play. If you accept it to stay with her she knows she has the power. If you don't and move on, she knows you have the power and will do anything to keep you around. Or she will let you move on to look for weaker prey. Either way you're better off telling her you don't want to be in a relationship with a set of rules you have to walk on egg shells around. Tell her you think she would be better off with a guy with her condition who can be more understanding, that…
/r/askTRP23/03/16 09:29 PM
1

I was just applying your point to the woman in the post who got to choose a low paying major and career like feminist studies, probably because she's supported by a man who had to have a career.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:39 PM
2

Imagine being able to ask this well intentioned woman if she happens to get any money from a man currently, through inheritance, marriage or divorce, that affords her the time to waste on her low earning career with such navel gazing questions.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 04:48 AM
3

A girl who trades sex for marriage is just a high priced whore. Who's to say she will give you sex after marriage? It's certainly not legally enforceable like the marriage commitment she would get from you. What is she offering to you in this relationship that you can't get from friends or family?
/r/askTRP21/03/16 04:14 PM
6

If women want equal prize money, they should be allowed to join the men's competition. Then they can be happy when they get a fat $0 along with all the other losers. Equality for men and women, right. Women's rights advocates could even get together and offer their own prizes to the top female, whether she places 1st or 15th among them men. I'd pay to see that competition. Women's rights have managed to make the conversation about having their own competition where men weren't allowed, so they c…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 03:16 PM
1

Even if the marriage fell through, if she as an adult, makes the choice to take the kids away from the father, fights in court to have sole responsibility for the kids, why is the father then still expected to support her financially in that decision to take his kids from him? That's what makes child support so evil, it tells the father you're not good enough to see your kids, but you still have pay the woman who took them.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/16 02:44 PM
0

Yeah, I don't know either. My surprise take away was that honesty and communication are extremely important to a relationship according to Reddit users, except in the case of a woman lying about her n count. Then it's best to hide the truth. My faith in the internet is shaken.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/16 09:48 PM
4

I'm glad that you're happy, and I hope your husband feels the same way. However, I can't help but think that you're letting a number of very minor differences get in the way of an opportunity to be more intimate with your husband. Different temperatures and color decors keep you from sleeping in the same room? How does color decor matter when your eyes are closed asleep? My belief is that overcoming these differences strengthens the relationship more than accepting them. But if you think you'll …
/r/RedPillWomen16/03/16 02:19 PM
-15

And somehow, because she is currently married, everyone supports the rapist and insists that she shouldn't report to the police. Any time a girl doesn't report a rape to the police, she consented and secretly hopes he comes back to plow her again. But just to be safe, Reddit suggests only raping married women, because they can't report it to the police to protect their husband-boy's fee fees.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/16 02:10 PM
10

If she has no idea how it happened, how does she prevent it from happening again? And again. And again. And each time it happens she has no choice but to protect her husband by hiding it from him again. And again. And again.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/16 01:59 PM
14

In many contexts, yes. It can be considered a gay slur or a slut slur. However, few people would consider what their friends do as harassment, else they wouldn't be friends. Mattress girl and this guy are definitely not friends, and it is sexual harassment. And besides drawing a penis is different than drawing your penis. If I draw a naked woman, it's art, if I draw my boss naked, it's sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 08:22 PM
10

Well, I suppose if you're going to define sexual harassment as when a man harasses a woman, I can't argue with you. If a guy strapped a mattress to his back and falsely claimed he had sex with a specific girl and drew pictures of her boobs, for everyone to see, you would call that sexual harassment, and he would be asked to stop. She would not have harassed a female in this way, and if she did, it would have been sexual harassment. Calling a woman a slut is sexual harassment, how is calling a ma…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:20 PM
1

I think you hit it on the head with the idea of reciprocation. No one is saying women can't control their attraction, just like men they can have sexual thoughts that don't lead to actions. The danger is when these feelings may be reciprocated and acted on by the third party. This doesn't begin and end with rape, it also includes relationship sabotage, such as innocent friendly things like listening, telling you what you want to hear instead of what you need to hear, taking your side against you…
/r/RedPillWomen15/03/16 06:07 PM
4

You might be splitting hairs here to rationalize how you treat your man.
/r/RedPillWomen15/03/16 05:51 PM
56

Her harassment becomes sexual when she begins drawing pictures of his genitals, which are specific to his gender, and constitute gender based harassment. And since rape is essentially defined as male penetration, it's not a stretch to suggest false rape accusations are a form of gender based harassment. Something women do to men because of their gender/ sexual orientation. It's not harassment if the accusations are shown true, but if they're shown false, as in this case, then going public with a…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:37 PM
-3

Thanks for the response. The last paragraph was just in case she was trolling, but it never hurts to try. And I'm guessing by the removal she didn't get the answer she wanted anyway.
/r/RedPillWomen15/03/16 05:16 PM
-13

OP stalks a husband she used to have feelings for. I logged into his email Calls her husband with merit less assumptions that the husband isn't concerned with. I was looking through the profile Instead of leaving it with her husband, she decides to take the matter out of his hands and back into her own. I went to the search history Because she has way to much time on her hands to just change the password and move on from a Facebook account she doesn't use anymore. he...may still have have feelin…
/r/RedPillWomen15/03/16 03:49 AM
1

But of course the mother can without the permission of the father.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 07:23 PM
4

They also have the IUD if they can't remember to be bothered with a pill every day.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 07:21 PM
1

Then you're advocating for a progressive change to child support. Because right now, a parent can have primary custody, and have to pay the other parent, because he makes more money than her. They can have joint custody and he has to pay because he makes more money. The system is not based on fairness, it's not based on custody, it's based on penalizing the higher earner. The mother could have a job that pays $100,000, earning more than most married couples combined, but does she deserve child s…
/r/MensRights12/03/16 05:52 PM
1

What would happen if a man brought his baby to a Safe Haven? Arrested on the spot?
/r/MensRights12/03/16 04:09 PM
1

To answer your question more specifically, why not make it easier for a woman to divorce her husband, so as not to encourage her to stay in a bad relationship? What if, and this might blow your mind, but what if the woman is the abusive, controlling, manipulative part of the relationship that makes it so bad? Should we be offering her husband's money to her as child support to make it easier for her to divorce her husband? That's the problem. I agree with you that any one should be able to leave…
/r/MensRights12/03/16 06:04 AM
1

You were just saying that it's hard for a single parent and that the support of a second parent makes a big difference. That's one reason to encourage couples who commit to stay together, for the children. Nowadays we here how couples should divorce for the children. But what does that teach children about the importance of two parents? Or about relationships with family for adults? Do we divorce our mother, or uncle, or sister for getting on our nerves and driving us crazy? Do we encourage peop…
/r/MensRights12/03/16 05:47 AM
1

It just doesn't follow that because it is difficult for some people they have the right to force someone else to help against their will. More than half of American children are being born out of wedlock. We all know it's a woman's body and a woman's choice to have the baby without marriage. More than half of divorces are initiated by women. We all know it's their choice to divorce their children's father. Women are choosing to leaving the father out of the family in unprecedented numbers. Is it…
/r/MensRights12/03/16 12:24 AM
2

I think there's a model out there in the form of aura gate parents, essentially, the other couple adopts the baby before its born, while the surrogate mother is still pregnant. There's no doubt when the baby is born who becomes legally responsible for it. And as for opting in, there're at least two advantages. One is that it gives the father a positive choice to make, opting in to raise the child instead of opting out to abandon the child. Second, if the father was never presented with the choic…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 07:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter