TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

newprofile15 Archive

View 0 posts and 60 comments by newprofile15 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

> We shouldn't force anyone out of any field. Inviting people to explore a career option isn't to the exclusion of others already there. Opportunities are finite. You can't just say "everyone should have everything they want always." When it comes to doling out opportunities, you give to someone you generally need to take from others. > No, I don't. And I don't understand what "political diversity" has to do with this. Ok, then what do you mean, if not diversity of skin color, gender, sexual ori…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 01:21 AM
1

If we're talking about how most affirmative action programs work, it means that lower test scores, lower grades, lower prior achievements get greater results than they otherwise would. So there is one level for "average qualified applicant" for group A and a different level for group B. "Well if there was no diversity initiative/quota/handicap in place, we would have given opportunities to persons A B and C. Instead C does not get the position, and we give the position to X because we need a min…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 01:15 AM
1

Ok, so if we start paying men $5k "diversity" bonuses over women and establish a max number of female nurses in hospitals, such that it causes qualified women to be excluded over less qualified men, you won't be bothered?
/r/MensRights20/04/19 11:14 PM
1

> But you're telling me you like a world where the elementary school teachers and nurses are exclusively white women? Why does it matter? Should we force women out of teaching in order to get more men teaching elementary school? What if women want to teach elementary school more than men do? Or vice versa? >Should anyone outside the dominant paradigm experience barrier to entry, or does a qualified individual with a different perspective bring something unique and worthwhile to the table? Divers…
/r/MensRights20/04/19 11:12 PM
1

"Diversity" is code for "handicap straight white and asian men."
/r/MensRights20/04/19 11:09 PM
9

What are you offering, exactly? Or just concern trolling? Yea no surprise that any advocacy sub is going to become a hub for outrage links, it's easy to post and its generally what people come to the sub for, to be honest.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 11:05 PM
3

Do you really think that men face no disadvantages at all relative to women in criminal sentencing? Or in family court? Do you feel the numbers bear that out? Do you feel juries treat men and women equally?
/r/MensRights12/05/17 05:31 PM
3

Have you ever considered that those are actually different groups of people say that, that you have a confirmation bias, or that you're simplifying a complex and nuanced issue? No, I've never had a different opinion and I've never tested my opinion in any way, talked to anyone with a different opinion or done any research on the subject whatsoever. Only people who agree with you can truly grasp the nuances, everyone else is close-minded and dim. Or maybe my opinion is informed by my own educatio…
/r/MensRights01/09/15 12:50 AM
3

"I did it because of X, Y, and Z societal pressures!" Waste of time. Responsibility dodge. No excuses. Tired of this determinist bullshit being used to justify this whole culture war. On one hand feminists will claim that women are empowered and capable of taking the reins of society... In the next breath they will blame the amorphous patriarchal traditions and act as though they have had zero influence or control over the development of these traditions.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 12:03 AM
2

JDs are actually among the worst degrees for aimless applicants due to their immense cost ($200k), time (3 years), higher unemployment and bimodal salary distribution (huge swaths of lawyers make less than $70k year).
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:39 PM
3

Do most men really have a huge appetite for variety in fashion? I sure as hell don't.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:36 PM
2

I think both discrepancies in pay are reasonable and the result of the overall market rather than some kind of gender discrimination. Woman models are more important in the fashion world. Fashion for women represents a much bigger slice of the overall fashion market. No conspiracy behind it or invidious discrimination. Male sports leagues represent the vast majority of revenue for sport in general. Athletes set up unions and take a big chunk of overall revenues. Woman pro sports leagues are ofte…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:35 PM
2

You are putting yourself in danger hanging out people that sympathize with her... sounds like hyperbole but you really aren't that far away from being falsely accused yourself. The fact that she is your girlfriend won't protect you.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 09:46 PM
3

What's your source for either claim?
/r/MensRights01/06/15 05:41 AM
8

Did HE specifically mention /r/mensrights? Or was that inserted by the author? There are (or at least were, I don't know if they still exist) some very misogynistic subs... I remember there was one dedicated to beating women for example (anyone remember that nutcase violentacrez?) If he's including /r/mensrights in the category of "misogyny" then he is just very misinformed. But then again, reddit management has been shown to be very feminist and exclusionary against those who don't fit within t…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:40 PM
7

You're going to have to give some more context because I have no idea what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 05:55 PM
6

Even though the chance he proceeds to trial with this litigation is very slim, the mere act of the lawsuit does act to salvage his reputation to an extent.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 07:14 AM
4

Yea... False claims in general are just a fucking awful problem to deal with. If they DO have legal punishments against women like her, you'll find a lot more false claimants clinging to their false stories because they have more on the line... And if you allow for some kind of mental illness defense everyone will just retreat into that. Insanity isn't an easy defense to pull off in criminal courts but I bet it would be viewed more charitably in the context of a false accuser. But yea it's shitt…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 06:42 AM
3

Not saying that she shouldn't receive treatment but we're in a situation where there is just no legal deterrent to making these false claims. It wastes police and school resources, terrorizes fellow students, and degrades the credibility of true accusations. And in exchange she gets rewarded? I don't have a complete answer to balancing needs for deterrence as well as helping the mentally ill (as well as separating the "mentally ill" accusers from the spiteful and cynical accusers who make false …
/r/MensRights10/05/15 06:14 AM
10

Sorry, zero sympathy with this woman. Zero sympathy with a movement that discusses expanding the definition of rape so far so that YES no longer means YES, but in fact can sometimes mean RAPE. This isn't just idle chattering either - this is shit that is SERIOUSLY discussed by academics and legal scholars. The nasty culture... what a fucking joke. I only see one "nasty culture" here, and it is her and her culture that turns every sexual encounter as a man into a minefield, where a woman can give…
/r/MensRights09/05/15 11:07 PM
1

Just tired of all the confusion and misinformation I see about defamation law.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 10:56 PM
-4

Thanks for your quasi-legal analysis. You clearly are not a lawyer, since (among other misstatements) you think that juries only exist in criminal proceedings. Points for sounding so sure of yourself when you're talking out of your ass though.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 10:36 PM
3

Christ... the Guardian really publishes some fucking garbage don't they.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 10:23 PM
0

Lol good luck suing someone for calling you a mommas boy or lame.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 10:16 PM
-1

And I'm merely pointing out why defamation isn't really an effective countermeasure to slander like this. This is not an easy case and damages would be difficult to prove... not to mention you'd struggle to find a sympathetic jury AND you have no idea if you'll be able to collect a judgment (if you win) from the defendant.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 10:14 PM
19

It isn't just silly, it's absolutely toxic and violent. Claiming you were raped isn't just personal - it is exercising the violence of the state against the accused by arrest, trial, and imprisonment... and that is not even taking into account the social stigma and ostracism that comes with being labeled a rapist. Accusing anyone of such a serious felony is an act of violence that can only be done when it is in fact TRUE. Defending such false accusations as political statements of personal devel…
/r/MensRights09/05/15 10:09 PM
2

Who else are you going to hire to fill the African-American studies department? The subject itself guarantees racially exclusionary hiring.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 10:05 PM
1

Great, now you have to 1) find the false statement 2) show the damages 3) are the damages higher than your legal costs and time spent? if not, you lose.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 10:01 PM
4

Yep, no accusation against the guy who had sex with her when she was blackout drunk though. Gee that's odd.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 04:11 AM
1

Go ahead and keep preaching to the choir and tailoring your message to people who already agree with you. That's all that gets accomplished with a post like this. At best, it's a crowd pleaser for men who are already skeptical of the rape culture hysteria... pointless. See, the information you cite about Sweden and Belgium - THAT is the kind of messaging that is both effective and not easily leveraged against us. The information speaks for itself, for moderates and even feminists (although they …
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:50 AM
-7

More pedantry that goes out of its way to miss the point. Posts like OP's are part of why MR has an image problem. "MRAs Compare Rape Victims to 'the Boy who Cried Wolf!'" It's a clueless and insensitive metaphor (yes, insensitive to victims because guess what, they fucking exist). You're not going to get anyone to join your side or listen to you using it. We should be citing instances of false reports, the costs of false accusations and convictions upon the accused (and victims), the political …
/r/MensRights27/04/15 10:57 PM
-6

Another pedantic reply. Obviously I'm not saying "discard due process in some situations." I'm saying not to make broad statements condemning all women claiming to be rape victims as liars.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 10:40 PM
6

This is the kind of shitpost that makes this whole movement look bad. Stay focused on specific examples of false allegations and the policies that both discourage false claims and promote justice for true claimants. You look like a fucking moron when you make broad statements that encourage people to doubt any and all victims. It gives ammo to the feminist radicals who say "believe ALL victims."
/r/MensRights27/04/15 09:29 PM
2

Articles like this are entirely necessary to establish the hypocrisy and double standard going on, regardless of what your personal opinion of what the line for sexual assault should be. Reasonable people can disagree about what level of intoxication invalidates consent but it DEFINITELY occurs at some point... and consent from someone that the other person describes as "wasted" would be well past that point for most (if not all) reasonable people. Yes... feminists might debate about whether the…
/r/MensRights25/04/15 05:36 AM
1

Copy of the complaint as well. P. 11 has info on the other two "accusers." http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/2015_0424_columbia.pdf The first, Jane Doe #1, who was also a member of ADP, filed her complaint against Paul at the end of April or early May 2013, shortly before her graduation. Jane Doe #1 erroneously and wrongfully alleged that a full year prior to her filing (i.e. during the end of her junior year, which was the end of Paul’s freshman year), Paul had grabbed her at a p…
/r/MensRights25/04/15 05:15 AM
6

Rapists obviously do go uncharged (as do all criminals) but the percentages they put out there are absolutely absurd... for example, this incredibly false graphic which has been widely circulated(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2014/12/09/the-truth-about-a-viral-graphic-on-rape-statistics/).
/r/MensRights25/04/15 05:13 AM
14

Women make up 60% of college students but a much smaller proportion of engineering students. This must be the result of SEXISM and couldn't possibly have ANYTHING to do with the personal decisions of women entering college. To rectify this we should put maximum quotas on the number of men in engineering programs until we have true equality. Oh, and the majors where women vastly outnumber men by huge margins? We don't talk about those.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 04:09 PM
1

Really? Sounds to me like she was just drunk... and stupid.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 08:36 PM
113

Man the first person just had no idea what she was getting herself into. Stripping the hero of their power is the subject of practically every issue! How else would there be any suspense? Hell, how many "death of Superman" or "defeat of Batman" cycles have we seen at this point?
/r/MensRights18/03/15 08:32 PM
16

Buddy... you must know nothing about comic books. There are a gazillion comic book covers where the hero is getting his ass beat. It just sells the comic books better - it actually builds suspense and piques interest when the buyer thinks "oh man, how is he going to get out of this!"
/r/MensRights18/03/15 08:30 PM
-3

I'm just gonna play devil's advocate here... the article probably doesn't include all of the trolls; one of them might have made an actual threat beyond just "suck a dick." If she got a real threat I wouldn't blame her for pressing charges (or at least considering it).
/r/MensRights18/03/15 05:23 AM
2

Remember, if a woman ever does ANYTHING wrong... a man must have pressured or seduced her into it.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 05:15 AM
6

What a fucking asshole. Hope he keeps the "difference" in mind if he ever gets the shit beaten out of him... since he's a man, it must have been because he got in someone's way. Fucking outrageous.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 05:12 AM
21

Western feminism in a nutshell. "Yes, we have equal rights under the law and western society does everything it can to cater to us - but Canada is worse than Saudi Arabia because some women still think they're fat!" These people are fucking deranged.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 05:11 AM
5

Yep, it's "that rich frat boy definitely raped her, he just got off with his high powered lawyers!!!" Regardless of whether he is rich, a frat boy, had an expensive lawyer, got off on a technicality, or actually committed the crime... it doesn't matter. He's a man, therefore guilty.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:39 PM
1

The propaganda value isn't dead yet. I guarantee you will hear this number (and similar variations of it) during the 2016 Presidential campaign.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 10:09 PM
1

Well of course in feminist logic, that means they just have to increase the multiplier for "unreported rapes." That statistic must mean that for every reported rape, there are 30 billion unreported rapes.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:51 PM
2

Not advocating this but if I was a frat guy on Berkley I'd make an example to prove the absurdity. Well... no you wouldn't.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 04:50 AM
5

She's not getting fired for this.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 04:49 PM
1

Remember, women have zero agency and are never in control of their actions according to this mindset.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 04:47 PM
6

The whole "instantly believe the accuser with no fact-checking" is becoming par for the course when it comes to liberals writing about rape.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 03:56 AM
5

Well she had determined that the fraternity was populated by straight white males... Furthermore, they were inside of a "fraternity." Put two and two together shitlord - straight white men + fraternity = guilty of rape.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 03:56 AM
13

The holes and inconsistencies in the story, as well as the complete lack of fact checking on the part of the author. Among reporter T Rees Shapiro's findings were that there is no record of the fraternity having a party on the night Jackie says she was raped and there is no individual at the fraternity who matches the description of the man she says led her attack. More... When Jackie told the paper the name of her alleged attacker, it was similar to that of a Virginia graduate who belonged to a…
/r/MensRights06/12/14 03:55 AM
0

If you had a world of ubermensches it would hardly matter what kind of economic system was in place.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 09:33 PM
2

To be honest, I'd be pretty cautious if I was a prosecutor in this situation. I would really want to see some completely foolproof and damning evidence of the falsehood before even considering moving forward... and even then, I'd probably consider whether the accuser intended to make a false accusation or if something else was going on.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 08:42 PM
3

It's a troll post, downvote it into oblivion.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 08:39 PM
5

Yep, look at the other comments on "his" profile. Either a troll or SRS dropping by to make the sub look bad.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 08:38 PM
4

Wait, couldn't he post them and just say she was beautiful and perfect, since then it wouldn't because there is no emotional harm? The CA statute requires a showing of emotional harm. Porn stars could not use it at all - that "distributed material was created under an agreement by the person appearing in the material for its public use..." Also, any material created where the person appearing waived an expectation of privacy is excluded from the law. It looks like the mens rea required is purpos…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 08:36 PM
7

Wow, talk about missing the point. Using an alias, prosecutors said Iniguez posted derogatory comments about his ex-girlfriend, whom he dated for four years, on her work's Facebook page in December 2013. Months later, he posted nude photographs of her on the same page, calling her a "drunk" and "slut," Matejan said. He encouraged her employers to fire her. And... you're defending this guy? I'm gonna wait and see what I think about the implementation of the revenge porn law overall, but I do thin…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 08:31 PM
8

Inaccurate because the shirt wasn't misogynistic in the first place. It was made by a woman. Assuming that a shirt with women in sexualized poses is misogynist is itself sexist.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 03:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter