newuofh Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
6	What value do the majority of r/theredpill participants place on compassion, benevolence and humaneness, and why?		newuofh	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/10/13 03:42 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
6	Rape, part 3. This is the question I was building towards. That night. Which had a part before the sickness. And a part after the sickness. This place is frustrating with so many people dodging and dancing around points. Why do you repeat something to which I already replied? This is not how a good debate works.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/10/13 09:16 PM
4	Rape, part 3. This is the question I was building towards. Yet the comment did not specify making a move after she had thrown up. In order to blatantly encourage rape, it would have to encourage making a move after she had shown clear signs like getting sick and throwing up. Therefore it didn't encourage rape?	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/10/13 09:04 PM
3	Rape, part 3. This is the question I was building towards. He has no reason to complain. All he needed to do was make the slightest move and he was in. Let's face it, the guy was too much of a pussy to do anything. She was definitely DTF. No sympathy from me. The example you gave talks about making a move on a drunk girl after a coherent conversation, and I just saw you say in another thread that There is a point at which a person is too drunk to consent to sex. We vaguely concluded that the "no consent point" is when the person is stumbling and/or slur…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/10/13 08:35 PM
4	Rape, part 3. This is the question I was building towards. It seems very important to differentiate between "could easily lead to"and "IS" rape. No matter how shitty something is, exaggerating and calling it a crime when you mean it could LEAD to a crime neither wins a debate nor is a good way to convince anyone that it is shitty. There is also a difference between calling someone a... supporter of manipulation and pushing through LMR, and a supporter of rape. If only the former is factual, the latter becomes an unwarranted insult, right?	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/10/13 08:30 PM
3	Rape, part 3. This is the question I was building towards. Are you saying that TRP encourages rape, that TRP encourages techniques that could lead to rape if misused, or that there is no difference so TRP does both?	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/10/13 08:03 PM
2	Using categorization as a way to justify prejudice I disagree that any of that information will lead to anything more harmful than potentially men getting rejected more, or losing a marriage. (though I think if they apply the info right, it won't have that effect). I have little exposure to either, but aren't there certain parallels between /r/theredpill and radical feminism? Specifically in using deliberately derogatory terms and making generalizations vilifying men or women that lack or exaggerate evidence.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/10/13 06:45 PM
2	Using categorization as a way to justify prejudice Yet if you can predict that there is a high chance other people will use their own brains to do something harmful as a result of being exposed to an environment that you could have controlled to reduce the chance of that happening. Doesn't exactly this liberty allow you to do this? And aren't there ways to avoid censoring information while still indicating the source of the information, tagging for example?	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/10/13 06:11 PM
1	Using categorization as a way to justify prejudice Why not use generalizations along with a rule to delete or tag things that seem like potentially harmful groupthink?	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/10/13 05:36 PM
0	Rape, consent, and TRP. How is a law that leads to imprisoning people based solely on the word of one witness a good law?	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/10/13 08:14 PM
2	Men are superior Wikipedia says Misogyny is the hatred or dislike of women or girls. Misogyny can be manifested in numerous ways, including sexual discrimination, denigration of women, violence against women, and sexual objectification of women. "Hatred OR dislike of women" is pretty subjective, if a parent says the only thing his fucking kid contributes to the household is the welfare check arriving every month, is it dislike or simply a statement of utility? It is true that someone doesn't need to hate camels …	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/10/13 05:39 PM
4	Men are superior I don't know if I've made the analogy with you or someone else, but I compared that statement to camels. If someone came along and claimed that: "the only thing useful about [camels] is [their backs so I can ride them for transportation]". Would you automatically call him a camel-hater for pointing out what he thinks is the utility of camels? People are just so quick to throw that word, misogyny, anywhere they like. No, then again, the camel is not even human... But this post didn't throw in mis…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/10/13 03:50 PM
0	Men are superior There must be a way to avoid misunderstandings like this... Specifically in this subreddit there could be a rule to only post full quotes with the relevant part in bold.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/10/13 03:13 PM
5	Men are superior Superior can probably mean better at certain things depending on the definition, so I agree some people could see it that way and they could be in error. I'm pretty sure if I were a man and happened upon a forum thread titled "great talk, "women are superior"" where a bunch of women said my gender cooked well and that was the only single trait, out of all traits, in which my gender ever beat their gender, I'd think those women thought they were the superior gender.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/10/13 03:06 PM
5	Men are superior Hypothetically if genders were flipped: I have yet to find anything men are better at that doesnt involve children. Even with kids they arent always better, but its what they are here for....That 15 year old kid knows nothing about life... Real life will smack him in the face with its hard tits soon. (12 upvotes, 2 downvotes). Not if hes pretty, then he wont get that smack in the face till hes 30. (6 upvotes, 0 downvotes). Here's another: the only important things men contribute to humanity is t…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/10/13 02:18 PM
5	Men are superior Technically not, yet doesn't no one mentioning it imply implicit agreement?	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/10/13 02:13 PM
3	Rape question 2 It sounds like dividing the the all-encompassing "rape" into several more specific terms might clear up a lot of disagreement.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/10/13 01:37 PM
7	Men are superior It is in the title of the thread from which the quotes have been taken.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/10/13 01:09 PM
2	Using categorization as a way to justify prejudice Do you think this is a problem in reddit's redpill specifically? Is it happening in the femosphere as well? Are there prominent blogs voicing concern over it?	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/10/13 10:31 AM
1	What is so hard about just being decent to everybody? TRP hating feminists and feminists hating TRP... are both complimentary from this perspective.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/10/13 09:34 AM