TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nexisprime Archive

View 0 posts and 39 comments by nexisprime on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

You are. Wait until combat when you are considered expendable and women are kept from the action to protect them. This was the point that you made and the one that I responded to. You then tried to dismiss my claim by bringing up the draft, which you did not include in your original comment. That is the definition of moving the goalposts. I don't disagree with you about the draft, as I said previously, but that wasn't what we were talking about. It's not chauvinistic to state realities. Women ar…
/r/MensRights05/08/24 09:22 PM
0

You're moving the goalpost. If that was what you meant, then you should have started with that. If the draft was in effect, then you'd have a point. But it's not and hasn't been for 50 years. Every single person in the military right now has volunteered to be there. To stymie your weak response though, I do think that either women should be draftable, or that the draft be abolished altogether.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 06:43 PM
0

What are you talking about? There are plenty of females in the army in other roles. Almost a fifth of the Army is female. Right now, the military is completely voluntary. Are you expecting it to be 50/50? That seems unrealistic. When you say that men are considered expendable, that implies combat roles. I wasn't including other positions in my comment, obviously.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 04:45 PM
6

I was in the army. That isn't exactly accurate. It's more to keep them out of the way of the men. The average woman is worse than useless in combat. A fully geared female is not going to be able to drag a fully geared, injured male to safety, at least not as fast as they should. They can't run as fast, or as far. They can't carry as much equipment. In a combat scenario, if they're not as capable as the men, then they are a hindrance. Would I rather have a female by my side than no one else? Yes,…
/r/MensRights05/08/24 03:55 PM
6

Also I would take responsibility if I didn’t knowing she was not using any form of contraception or if we planned to have one, this is a pretty important factor here. I think you missed my point. I'll say it again, no contraceptive is 100% effective. It doesn't matter if she lied about being on some sort of contraceptive or not. You, knowing the risks, consented to child making activities and are now wanting to shirk responsibility because you feel like you were wronged. You have a child now and…
/r/MensRights15/03/24 03:32 PM
6

Is the only purpose of someone entering your home that they can eat from your fridge or use your toilet? Of course not, they could be there for a great deal of other purposes. But the only purpose of sex is to make children. There are incentives to sex, i.e. the pleasure, but that is not the purpose. So consenting to sex is consent to children. I agree that the purpose of contraception is to avoid having children. But I'll say it again, no contraceptive is 100% effective. By consenting to sex, y…
/r/MensRights15/03/24 03:23 PM
0

Except it is consent. You are participating in an activity where the only purpose is producing children. By consenting to sex, you are accepting the risk of the woman becoming pregnant. Even if no woman ever lied about being on birth control, no contraceptive is 100% effective. And yes, I have said this to women as well. The difference is the women I've said this to are wanting to use this excuse to murder their children while you are just wanting to abandon your responsibility.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 02:35 PM
3

Equal outcome by definition can't actually be equal. Someone has to get something extra to make up for whatever difference there is. This incentivizes laziness because even if you don't work for it, you'll get the same rewards as someone who did. Equal opportunity is actual equality. Everyone gets the same or similar opportunities, then it's up to the individual to use them effectively. People can't then complain that they aren't as successful as someone else because it's their own fault for not…
/r/MensRights21/02/23 02:37 PM
2

I’m not seeing a rebuttal. Just saying “shit philosophy” means nothing. Garbage argument.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 07:28 PM
-3

You're missing the point. The point wasn't about jail. It was about consequences. Consequences are amoral. They're the results of actions or behaviors, and they have to be endured. Pregnancy is the consequence of sex.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 05:37 PM
-2

I think you need to face your own evil.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 05:22 PM
-6

Stop defending murder.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 05:08 PM
-4

Yes, it is. By your logic, we can't send people to prison for committing crimes. Since that would be forcing them to face the consequences of their actions.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 05:06 PM
12

You have no idea what you are talking about. I can tell you haven't even read the bill. The main point of the bill is that is prohibits teachers from saying that "an individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously." Slavery can and will be taught. Same with with Women's Suffrage and the Civil Rights Movement. We're not going to stop teaching about the struggles our country has gone through and the evils that have h…
/r/MensRights13/07/21 02:18 PM
1

Go pokes!
/r/MensRights13/07/21 01:40 PM
42

I think the more fucked up part is that she was only given a four year sentence to begin with. Monsters like this deserve the chair.
/r/PussyPass22/12/20 06:14 AM
15

It’s a term made up by feminists to make men feel bad for being men. That’s about as deep as that is. They typically bring it out when a man does something they don’t like.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 04:25 AM
24

You are clearly extremely shallow on a logical level if you think that an unborn human is just a clump of cells.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 06:25 AM
47

wooooosh
/r/MensRights20/12/19 05:22 PM
54

We don't want to hear "both sides," because that tends to end up in only favoring the male perspective. Well, maybe if you made your perspective more favorable it wouldn't be that way. This is such a childish way of thinking. "If I can't beat you with my strategy, I'll ban your strategies until I do."
/r/PussyPass22/10/19 01:40 PM
27

Did you miss the part where she tried to shove him?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/19 01:26 PM
1

You're absolutely right. I just get worked up about people like that since I've spent the past six years in the Army. It's hard listening to people like that when you personally know people who have died so that they can spew their ignorance. u/MaxDearborn, I apologize for the insult.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 05:53 PM
-6

Because you'd be fighting to defend those rights, you selfish coward. Part of the government's job is to defend the country. And yes, right now we have a completely volunteer military, but if something on the scale of WWII were to happen again, then we would need the draft. As u/Fert1eTurt1e said, most people are not volunteering to be sent to the front lines. It isn't just about you when it comes to defending our rights as a nation, there's millions of other people you'd be fighting for.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 01:57 PM
1

I am arguing in good faith. Are those not your beliefs? I'm sorry if you don't like the look of them put side by side with mine. If a fetus is not human and abortion is legal, wouldn't that mean that there would be no deaths? No loss of life? For that column, I'm assuming that you are correct and that is the logical consequence. What other likely outcome could there be? And I apologize that you think that I'm ignoring key points. The answer was long as it is and I'm at work. So I'm not looking t…
/r/MensRights13/03/19 02:51 PM
1

In regards to your genocide argument, this seems to be a version of Pascal’s wager. You can fabricate all sorts of theoretical consequences, but it’s your responsibility to demonstrate they are true, and you haven’t done that. The whole point of Pascal's Wager is that you cannot demonstrate that either side is true. In this case, for arguments sake, I can't prove that unborn children are human and you can't prove the opposite. In order to find the most reasonable position to have we can look at …
/r/MensRights13/03/19 01:44 PM
1

How can they not be human life? What does it mean to be human, at a base level? Is it not only to have human DNA? Just because they are not aware yet does mean they are not human. By your own logic, we should be allowed to kill someone in a coma. They’re not aware, after all. Besides if we play the “they’re not human yet” game, where do we draw the line? Human development is fuzzy in its timeline. There’s no exact point that a fetus becomes aware. So how can we decide when it’s time to stop kill…
/r/MensRights13/03/19 03:57 AM
1

Here's how the conversation has been so far: I asked if you think killing children is murder. You said yes, but that fetuses are not children even though they have human DNA. I then asked if you think killing human life is murder. As well as addressing your point about fetuses not being human when I said that they have 100% human DNA and are still developing. Therefore implying that fetuses are human. You then accuse me of being dishonest because I somehow didn't acknowledge your point that I to…
/r/MensRights13/03/19 02:04 AM
1

How so? As far as I can tell, my statements follow logically. I even used a fact that you said so yourself. I didn’t twist your words. I’m trying to be as honest as can because I honestly believe that those that try and dehumanize fetuses are grievously wrong and are only supporting an actual first world genocide. So, please tell me exactly how I’m being dishonest.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 12:42 AM
1

Okay. Let me rephrase that: You don't think killing a human life is murder? You said it yourself, they have 100% Human DNA. That makes them human. Just because they are still developing doesn't make them any less human. And since they are human, abortion is murder.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 07:00 PM
1

Yes, I do and yes, I have but my opinion still stands. It is not reasonable to equate the desire to stop the murder of millions of unborn children to the full control of women's bodily autonomy. Especially since the first does not require the second. I am calling the other side of this particular debate unreasonable.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 05:10 PM
1

You don't think killing children is murder?
/r/MensRights12/03/19 05:04 PM
0

If you consider wanting to outlaw the murder of unborn children to be the equivalent of controlling women's bodies, then I guess it's not a lie. But since no reasonable person would make that comparison, I can safely say that it is, indeed, a lie.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 04:14 PM
1

If you consider outlawing the murder of unborn children to be dictating what women can do with their bodies, then sure, all of this would make sense. But that is not the case. We're not advocating for FGM here, for christ's sake.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 01:58 PM
4

Except the sarcasm is assuming that the first line is true. We understand the rest is hyperbole used to make a point but that point is based on a lie.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 01:51 PM
7

If Dog was overweight and couldn’t force a pillow into cuffs, then yes, I agree.
/r/PussyPass14/03/18 12:00 AM
7

She got let off easy. False rape accusers should be given the same punishment that the accused rapist would have been given if he was found guilty plus extra time for lying in court. And that is way the fuck more than 27 months.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/10/17 03:39 PM
-10

Amen. This mod is an asshole.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/17 07:34 PM
3

Whereas if she had aborted she would have been just fine with the desired result. Shows how reprehensible abortion is.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/17 06:15 PM
4

At first I thought you were being serious. Then I saw that second edit. Well played.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/17 05:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter