TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nice_rooklift_bro Archive

View 0 posts and 85 comments by nice_rooklift_bro on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The entire point is that they aren't there because there is no essential criterion. The belief of "gender essentialism" is that there are some traits that are universal to all males, or all females. I said I don't believe in that because nothing in biology or psychology works like that; there are no universal rules that always apply, every rule has an exception, unlike in hard science where no rule has an exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 09:28 PM
1

They reproduce and are completely normal because they are the same among their XX or XY peers in almost all cases. Yes, they are, which makes the idea of "males have XY, female XX" not a hard, absolute rule, but a guideline with exceptions, therefore not an essential criterion, as is always the case in biology, and therefore not hard science, that's all. As if sex is something completely interpretational like saying "you know good music when you hear it" just because it doesn't have strict rules…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 03:01 PM
1

Intersex people existing doesn't invalidate the only two viable sexes. That the line between "intersex" and "only two viable sexes" is completely vague and open for debate invalidates that biology is a hard science; that's all. In physics, every definition is objective, there is no room for human interpretation; it's stone cold and objective; no rule has exceptions; "99.99999% true" is "false" there. That's not the case here; everything is vague, muddy, there are no hard rules but muddy guidelin…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 09:48 AM
3

You have a very simplified understanding of human sex determination if you think it's just "X and Y chromosomes". Human beings with two X chromosomes are born with balls and a penis every day. Human beings with an X and an Y chromosome are born with ovaries and testes every day too. I never said "scientific knowledge" I said it wasn't hard science; there are no absolute rules in boplogy, every "rule" is a guideline with exceptions everywhere; in physics or mathematics, every rule is absolute, wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 12:53 AM
1

Biology is soft science. Biology isn't exact stuff of cold hard irrefutable mathematics like physics is.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 11:42 PM
1

Nope, that's my problem with "gender", "sex" and a variety of all these non-exact categories used by soft science: that they aren't defined by essential criteria—there isn't a single thing that can be named that is universal to all males or all females, or all humans or all mammals and so forth. The definition is "you know it when you see it". There are many things that are universal to say all electrons, or all photons, because if it doesn't meet those criteria, then it's not an electron by def…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 10:40 PM
2

I believe self-defence should only be used for self-defence, not for retaliation; it should only be used to the extend reasonably necessary to protect oneself, and anything else is illegal, and so is hitting first—one can be criminal towards a criminal. So no, I don't think that hitting back harder than necessary is justified. Sexes have no influence on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/20 06:51 PM
1

Dude, like I said; it's a huge industry. Something is funding 8 different "cute girls doing cute things" series every season where they're all as flat as a board. You can't just wish that away with "they're abnormal"; they exist in significant enough quantity to fund entire industries which makes your thesis of universality flawed—there are pop stars with flat chests drawing 50 000 man audiences because their chest is flat.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 08:30 PM
1

This of this is pre-historic terms, where people's hair fall off due to illness and malnutrition, not because they "wanted a brand new start". Long hair is DEFINITELY a signal for health. Our attraction brains evolution was from hundreds of thousands of years ago. Then why isn't a universally attractive thing on males? Why was the standard of beauty for females in the 30s in the US relatively short hair; this stuff changes all the time. But you're right about the fat percentage, but I think havi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 08:24 PM
1

As if long hair has anything to do with how many babies one can have, also, the ideal fat percentage for many babies is far beyond what is often considered the ideal. Neotenous faces that are very popular are also not at all indicative of being able to have many babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 07:53 PM
1

Take one look at 4chan and their appreciation of various body types that their entire media that apparently has enough fans to fund seasona nd seasons of cartoons to quickly conclude that isn't true—such is their appreciation of "delicious flat chest" and completely curveless shapes on females that 50% of them chant "boys make the cutest girls!" like a religion just because they believe that cute, androgynous males in female clothing look even better just because their chest is even flatter. thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 07:51 PM
1

You have to be kidding me. this is the standard of beauty in some cultures.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 07:48 PM
2

Not much I guess since I'm ugly and so are most of those I had sex with.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/20 10:53 PM
1

I'll take a trip to the amusement park instead; weddings are incredibly boring. I'm pretty sure the only reason they care so much is because all others around them are hyping it up so much. You mostly just stand around at a wedding.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 01:58 PM
1

Few care about marriage where I live anyway, so meh. I don't get this board's obsession with a piece of paper—it's pretty clear the obsession with marriage here is purely for sentimental, and not for practical reasons. And as the article suggests; it seems to not be isolated to this board but seems to be an American thing; and it deosn't even seem to be marriage, as much as it seems to be about weddings.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 06:46 AM
10

Any individual can do whatever it wants; I don't expect an entire category to do anything; I merely expect individuals to honour whatever agreements they made with me. I don't care about what feminists do either; they can do whatever they want; there's a difference between feminist and female; I don't partake in all these silly gender and identity wars.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/20 06:33 PM
3

For me, anything but chest length hair is a turnoff; if it's short it really doesn't matter to me whether it shows alopecia or not. Luckily though, wigs exist; I don't care one bit whether it's fake or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/20 04:15 PM
2

How would love be affected by getting married or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/20 08:35 AM
1

If the answer is that you never want to get married, say that and your reasoning. I don't expect to ever get married—unless the laws regarding it change so it's in my benefit to—because it's not in my benefit to right now. Marriage has only downsides where I live in the sense that. Even a usus marriage where both parties retain independent property stil has some requirements of financial support and there are administrative costs to get married and later to divorce. I see no advantage in a situa…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/20 07:15 AM
1

I can't name a single situation in my life where I even had to really say "no" or "yes" for that matter. Total strangers don't really have a tendency to ask me for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/19 05:31 AM
2

There is only sex, sexual orientation, and personality. I'm pretty sure sexual-orientation is very made up. It didn't seem to much exist before the 1860s when all human beings were bisexual—suddenly, some German psychiatrists invent the concept of "homosexuality" as psychiatrists are known to medicalize morality, an 40 years later it becomes a "social identity" and suddenly "sexual orientations" exist. It's funny to read old literature like the Tale of Genji or old Greek or Viking stories which …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/19 09:36 AM
2

From an evo psych perspective, no human being should ever waste energy on masturbating. Arm-chair evolutionary reasoning assumes that evolution is hyper efficient at doing what it does; the reality is that almost all species constantly display wasteful behaviour that does not go to maximizing the chance that selfish genes live on. If we're left to believe that natural selection is such a great selector, then why are fit and unfit human beings born? Why not only fit human beings? natural selectio…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/19 09:32 AM
1

Your experience of the world would surely change. All you have to do is watch any documentary of women going undercover as men to realize this. No doubt, but I wouldn't be able to know in what way it would if I don't know what kind of male I would end up being. It's basically asking "How would your life be if if you lived in a different country, but I won't tell you what country.", well, yeah... very different, that's all I can say.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/19 12:07 AM
2

I always found this question to be inherently impossible to answer: because it all depends on what kind of male I would be. You can't just say "You're now a male" and then ask for further comments; if I look around me I see many different males; it all depends on a lot of factors and what male I would be. For the purpose assume you're an equivalent man. If you're rich you're still rich. If you are SMV 7 you are still a 7, etc. This is not specific enough. Regardless, on the assumption that I kee…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 07:35 AM
2

I would be more weirded out by those that do. Where "social media" is defied as media where your offline and online life become connected basically and your online "profile" is about your offline life. None of my friends use that kind of stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 07:32 AM
1

Living in China and/or India.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 01:10 AM
2

I think both blue pill and red pill ideas are kind of ridiculous. It's not like I'm in the centre and feel both have a point; I feel both are quite similar to each other and quite ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 12:38 AM
1

I believe this to be a cultural thing that mostly centres around the United States. In most cultures "boyfriend" like "friend" is not a self-identified label but a descriptive term; you don't need to ask permission to use it much like "friend"; you just use it when it fits.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/19 11:08 PM
1

I don't care for getting the "girlfriend tag"; those that care about semantics and labels in general are seldom a friend of mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/19 11:07 PM
6

I definitely noticed here and elsewhere that males seem to be super uncomfortable with the idea that females don't value what they believe "masculinity" is so much.; they seem to really want to be valued for what they consider to be "their masculinity" instead of just being valued.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/19 08:37 AM
3

I have never met these mythical males that supposedly care about their penis size; they only hang out on reddit gendersphere subreddits where all posters are super insecure about their fraigle gender identity issues. If you would believe r/askmen then any male that you tell you had sex with a bigger penis once would immediately cripple in humiliation—I've never seen that to be the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/19 08:35 AM
1

Or they just have different subjective opinions on such matters, which this sub seems to find really hard to grog. I personally like loose-fitting clothes and wear them myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 10:05 PM
1

A hairstyle they personally like, which is of course quite personal and subjective. That is why I don't speak in vague terms like "better hairstyle" but just say "Grow your hair to chest length." edit: lol, I love how vague all the answers are: "It means get a haircut that fits you" like that helps—it's like these people don't realize how subjective that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 10:03 PM
2

So... not Canada and Australia?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/19 02:26 AM
3

Where "the west" is an American way of saying "The United States of America" right? Apparently only 30% of German females shaves their legs, I read—I keep reading that the reason it started in the US was actually because Gilette in the 20s made a bullshit advertisement campaign that implied that it was very popular in Europe and that was the time where the US was momentarily infatuated with European culture to the point of American newscasters faking a pseudo-British accent.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/19 01:43 AM
10

I don't know man; over at r/askmen it was once asked if they would have sex or date a female that never shaved everything and the majority answered in the negative. That basically excludes a good portion on the planet and basically the natural state. "average female" in modern perception is "average female that spends at least 30 minutes in front of the mirror each morning"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/19 12:45 AM
2

Ideal East Asian men usually don’t look androgynous in a way that is feminine, they just look very young like ages 14-17 and teenagers are not very sexually dimorphic. That's what androgynous is. Asia is, you know, notorious with their obsession with youth. Yes, and your claim is that there is a universal constant through time of females not being that; neither high testosterone nor high estrogen create a very youthful look—you claimed such a thing did not exist whereas clearly it does and it ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 05:47 PM
1

"depends on the man trying to obtain; depends on from what party". This is exactly why I disagree with all those silly pills; this absurd promise of there being one simple universal answer to the problem; if that existed then individuals everywhere would be doing it with great success.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 08:30 PM
4

Shy and confident aren't complements: one can be neither; one can be both.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 03:57 AM
3

Women’s attraction is shaped by biology (sexual dimorphism, hormones and fertility). Description of a handsome man has never changed. And every attractive characteristics of a handsome man can be directly linked to high testosterone and they are also signifier characteristics of quality sperm/fertility. How do you figure this? It's well noted that the East-Asian male ideal of beauty is perceived as highly androgynous by many standards outside of it. These famous Japanese, Chinese, and Korean mal…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 02:49 AM
2

All I know is that I've seen some standards of beauty in cultures that exist even today—let alone 500 years back—that would look awfully quaint from the perspective of other cultures. A biologist would say the 0.7 hip to waist ratio is sexually attractive to men because it indicates fertility, I wouldn't be too quick to ascribe popular evolutionary psychology as something biologists claim—a lot of this research basically comes from something done by some undergraduates once, and then they try to…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 02:43 AM
1

Most of the research on this of course uses pictures though. Like asked to choose between these bodies the percentge of allocated first picks, #1 by a larger margin is hardly "chippendale"; I'd say the 9.4% is the chippendales. and the 2.1% the bodybuilder.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 05:08 AM
2

You positive you weren’t just bi the whole time? I have never been against the idea of having sex with females, the first couple were just male. It wasn't some big realization for me or anything the first time I had sex with a female—it was more so an interesting realization when I realized that I have not found a male attractive in years; it was more so interesting that one could argue that I wasn't bisexual any more. but plenty of homosexual people have sex with the other gender and then reali…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/19 11:22 PM
2

This shit in general is so weird to me even outside of that; like I'm female and flat and pretty happy with that; if I weren't flat I might actually just get surgery to become flat but they won't do that—not even if you pay it from your own pocket. I would have to get some weird doctor's notice that I "identify as male" and start taking testosterone before they dot hat which I don't; I just like my chest flat. They just will not for cosmetic purposes if you're female flatten your chest if that i…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/19 11:14 PM
3

Breasts are a weird thing - they go in and out of sexual favor over time That hardly makes it weird, that makes it normal. The ideal of beauty of one's own culture 60 years back already starts to look quite dated. They definitely exist. I have a friend who is a natural J cup, and 95% of straight men think they’re a turn off. But holy hell, some guys are INTO her. This is the general thing with scarcity: my best friend is also pretty fat but it's still easy to get laid—why? because the smaller pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/19 11:10 PM
4

This idea that taste in gender is supposedly the one taste a human being can have that can never change is so ridiculous. So many individuals report that their change in gender shifted naturally throughout life; had nothing to do with "conversion therapy"; the first two individuals I had sex with were male and I enjoyed it; then came the first female; then still some males and now it's been over a decade since I last felt attracted to a male; I don't exclude that I won't find an attractive male …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/19 09:39 PM
2

I've seen this happen—super jealous type that got noticibly insecure at any male contact its SO had; SO openly falls in love with a female and the jealous one is completely fine with it and encourages it and then the SO left the former for the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/19 09:30 PM
1

I think pretty much any statement that includes the word "always" and doesn't pertain to exact science is flagrantly wrong—which is what I like about exact science, it's nice and simple and the word for "99.999% true" is "false". There was by the way a cross-cultural study posted here a while back about how much was cared about the virginity of one's opposite sex lover. The interesting thing was tht in Sweden and China females cared more about male virginity than in reverse, but in Sweden they c…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/19 05:05 PM
2

"defining the relationship" is a weird American idiosyncrasy. "relationships" here are like friendships in that you don't need to agree on a label to call someone your "SO"; you just do when it meets the generally accepted though vague established definition thereof, like "friend"—the words for "SO" and "friend" are also the same, but when it's grammatically used as an inalienable possession it means "SO" and otherwise "friend". "commitment" is also a weird American buzzword it seems that has no…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/19 06:07 AM
1

It's more that your usage of "all" is quite gratuitous; I have met many males that fall under none of those 5. Like ehh, you know there are super attractive individuals that are jobless and not-so attractive individuals that aren't. Like where does Bill Gates fit into all of this? I hear it's a very well paying job to be plurality shareholder of Microsoft.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/19 09:52 PM
3

Yeah so? What does that have to do with the fact that races can breed together and that this has happened extensively in the Americas and that it's thus an untennable idea to continue to see it as an absolute rather than a matter of degrees? Like what are you even arguing against here?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/19 07:36 AM
2

Well, I never was aroused by gays, so... I actually think people are confusing mental block with disgust. Disgust eliminates the possibility of arousal. Quite the opposite—a lot of kinks derive from the reaction of disgust, humiliating, taboo, and other such emotions. And no, being a surgeon is far not for everyone, that's why it's a high paying job. I'm pretty sure that's more so because it takes a long time to study than that one is sticking one's hand into a human body. Butchers work with exa…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/19 06:48 AM
2

Okay, let's say that's true; that doesn't change that it's nonsensical to say that one is either white or black when those two can obviously reproduce and what would you call the offspring then? Race is obviously a matter of degrees, not absolutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/19 06:47 AM
2

Can be so, but Idk. I personally have nothing against most gays. I don't have anything against surgeons too, but I think looking at surgery in process is disgusting; a lot of cultures did not have any aversion to gore. Had to? What did they try to accomplish? Get used to it over time I assume; they were both aroused by it and disgusted by it because they saw others get disgusted by it I assume so they just had to get used to it. I would assume that a surgeon might be disgusted by it at first too…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/19 06:11 AM
3

If she can enjoy sex with men she is not totally lesbian, IMO. E.g. I am straight and I just get grossed out by depictions of men fucking each other. I'm pretty sure that that is a cultural reaction because it simply doesn't happen in many cultures. The interesting thing reading on gay fora is that many admit that they also used to get grossed out by it and had to overcome that. Humans get grossed out by whatever they see others get grossed-out by; that's how culture works. There was definitely …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/19 06:02 AM
2

Genitals are kind of disgusting; a vulva looks like a flesh wound and a penis like a weird tuber root, scrota... urgh.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/19 05:48 AM
1

when i was younger there was a big trend of boys making out at parties and no one considered them gay or bi Yeah same here, about 18-ish years back I think? This was the Netherlands like in the 2000 and the culture really changed—it was really around 2000 the idea it seemed in the Netherlands that teenagers needed to experiment to find out what their sexual orientation might be. When I went to teenage parties at the time most were drunk which was legal at the time and all made out with all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/19 05:46 AM
3

Even gender identities haven't always worked the same way; a lot of cultures had more than two, or had a relative concept of it rather than an absolute concept. One might argue that say China and Japan maintain a relative rather than absolute concept of gender identity to this day—it's really interesting when one watches Japanese media in how relative they typically are about gender, as in it's considered normal for males to be attracted to other males provided the male be sufficiently androgyno…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/19 05:44 AM
2

What if I want none of them but am still fine with having sex? These sexuality labels and wanting to define them are dumb. Also, one quick look at r/sex gives one the impression that like 50% of males find the idea of providing cunnilingus kind of distasteful (though they won't admit it or something) and one assumes fellatio even more distasteful, so yeah. It's kind of a meme how often "straight males" are really not interested much in providing cunnilingus and find it distasteful.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/19 05:38 AM
2

I am well aware of the stats that show women are more likely to be open minded to having relations with another woman. Stats collected in only one culture say that. Whereas guys are not so easy going when it comes to being close to someone. Especially another man. Again, only one culture—Americans coming back from say Turkey will often remark upon how interestingly homoerotic the culture is and how comfortable males are to give each other physical affection, walk hand in hand, kiss each other on…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/19 05:36 AM
2

I think it's kind of worthless to try to classify hobbies by stereotypical genders; shared hobbies are nice, but most of my hobbies are not stereotypically feminine and are often rather obscure anyway. It's always nice to have something in common, but I don't really care whether that be stereotypically feminine or stereotypically masculine, common, obscure, or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/19 04:21 AM
2

A buzzword that changes definition from individual to individual—I don't much care for such words.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/19 05:05 PM
1

What I do in my free time is posting on reddit, metalwork, reading comics and watching TV-series, carpentry, skateboarding, drawing, and sewing clothes, and sometimes getting sucked into TVTropes or Wikipedia artlcles on a link hunt—I would assume that I keep doing those things till my body is incapable of doing that and perhaps pick up a new hobby. Regardless, as I said, the majority of single females is not looking for a relationship—you seem to phrase it as if this is some unorthodox or unusu…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/19 06:43 PM
2

I find it quaint that you assume that every single female must be looking for a relationship; apparently the majority does not. I am not and have never looked for a "relationship"—apart from that even if I were, "dating" rarely occurs where I live anyway; I don't know any individuals that ever went "on a date"; there's no word for it in my native language beyond the regular word for "appointment"/"agreement".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/19 04:46 PM
1

I think it’s because generally whether a man cares about the woman’s pleasure actually makes a huge difference in how pleasurable it will be for her whereas the opposite is not true. That is so much nonsense—I see endless complaints about "starfishing" females, how good or bad they are at fellatio and whatnot. Males have their ranking order about what females are good and bad in bed; one need only take a quick look at places like r/askmen or r/sex to note that. It's just your basic American / r/…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/19 06:41 PM
0

Why do you assume it's the responsibility of males to make females orgasm? I always found this perspective very quaint; it seems to never be phrased as if females have a responsibility to make males orgasm... during male/female sex it seems to often be phrased as if the male has the responsibility to make both itself and the female orgasm. In general when a male orgasms during sex it was its own doing. Seems like some weird chivalry to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/19 08:02 PM
1

1) What's the shortest and longest a dude has lasted, and which do you prefer? I've never had sex with one that felt a particular need to stop after its ejaculation. How often / If ever do you orgasm during sex? Both PIV and oral? I don't really do either PIV or oral Did the size really matter? Not really. Did his looks make it better or neutral? How would I be able to compare? How important is them making sure you're satisfied compared to 3 min of jackhammering and done? I don't really believe …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/19 07:59 PM
2

It's not just social science; "science" right now is filled with shit-tier research and very few data as in less than 1% will ever be attempted to be reproduced. There were actually some attempts at reproduction by just taking random trials and attempting to reproduce them in pharmaceutical things, they scored 11% and 25% reproducibility, so around 80% of clinical pharmaceutical trials can't even be reproduced... almost no party ever attempts reproduction. This comment has a lot of articles aggr…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/19 09:21 PM
1

I would do absolutely nothing, but then again if I were to have "children" I wouldn't be I.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/19 09:03 PM
1

So are ugly individuals; those with body dysmphoria are in general obsessed by it and they hate it; I'm not. I don't care much.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/19 12:47 PM
2

Yeah again, when I'm pretty ugly and they just tell me that they agree I'm ugly then I'm pretty sure they find me ugly. How much do you need to bend and break every form of reason to keep your world view alive?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/19 08:08 PM
2

Yeah, I'm not a 0/10 physical deformity. I'm just what most would qualify as 'ugly"; didn't stop there to be a nonzero number of individuals that fell in love with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/19 07:30 PM
2

Yeah, but when I have a pretty ugly face and their agreeing with me and telling me as such; I'm going to say the odds are higher that they just think I'm ugly. Fine with me; I'm not the one that has to look at it. The nice thing about one's own ugly mug is that without a mirror one can't see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/19 07:22 PM
2

Why not? You never saw an ugly individual being loved, married, and all that stuff? Not every human's pretty, and thank god not every human's deluded and blinded by love with massive pink filters either.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/19 07:16 PM
2

Other than that, romantic love without sexual attraction? Close to impossible. r/deadbeadrooms will tell you a very different story.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/19 07:13 PM
4

Not everything is blinded by love and not objective. I've been loved by individuals that knew I was ugly; that they like to hang out with me doesn't make them deluded that I'm not ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/19 07:13 PM
2

It's a reference to a Youtube chess commentator that somehow calls every rooklift a "very nice rooklift".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/19 09:26 AM
2

Yeah, agreed, you always live in a bubble and if you look around the entire world the ideal of beauty is obviously quite different from one's own—not that my ideal of beauty matches the place I live but in some it's even more divergent.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/19 02:05 PM
19

Let's separate aesthetic (I would look at their form for hedonistic pleasure) from attractive (I desire to have sex with them) then: aesthetic: hard to tell since one lives in a bubble obviously; the ideal of beauty in other places is different from here; I'm far more likely to appreciate the haircuts of males living around the CJK-region than in the Netherlands, but those might just be the models and visual kei stars you see; around me on the street it's definitely less than a promille that I e…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/19 02:03 PM
4

I don't see anything problematic with this part and the general 20/80 thing. The major problem is the unfounded implication that it's the same 20% for all females and that 80% is thus without a chance; the 20% number is only an average for starters, for some it's 2%, for others 50%, and each has their own different group it finds attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 01:53 PM
1

"confidence" is just a PC way to say "suave and charming" It sounds more "self helpy" when they say "be confident" what they mean is "be suave and charming, talk smoothly, don't stutter, make eye contact" and all that stuff; you can be confident all you want, but if you suffer from a speech impediment like stuttering or a lisp then that's it. It has very little to do with confidence and everything with just being a smooth talker.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/19 07:01 PM
1

It’s a well known fact that women approach men far less than men approach women, but why? In the Anglosphere; various cultures have it the other way around. In the Netherlands it's more common for females to approach males than in reverse. I spoke some Japanese individuals that claim that females are far more likely to make a "love confession" to a male than in reverse, but the males are more brazen about it. As in the females tend to do it by text, and the males in person. Both places are of co…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/19 01:23 PM
1

Oh please, a gentlem... lady... gentleper... gentilis doesn't ask about something as trivial as age. I legitimately have no idea; is one really at one point supposed to ask "So, how old are you anyway?"; the thought never crossed my mind to.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/19 10:53 AM
2

I don't think "highly logical" individuals typically care about labeling things and will rather negotiate actual deals and agreements without caring about whether it be called a "relationship" or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/19 06:36 AM
1

A buzzword with no coherent, universally agreed upon definition that like any such words is only used by fools not particularly interested in communication but just using language that is as emotionally laden as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 01:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter