TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nicksnacs Archive

View 4 posts and 165 comments by nicksnacs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You're an embarrassment to this sub. Unfortunately it's been overtaken by the redpill and mgtow: a bunch of lonely men seeking validation for their own crappy behavior and inability to find a mate. You won't even bother to look up the definition of the word "race". Just know that as long as you keep using the words sjw, gamma, libtard, and whatever else you can come up with, no one is ever going to take you or your "activism" seriously.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 01:06 AM
1

I think you have problems; you're hyper-aggressive and hyper-sensitive. Firstly you're projecting onto me calling me an SJW when I couldn't be anything close to it, I'm just stating facts. Based off your comment history it seems you do this all the time: calling people names if they disagree with you, getting down voted all the time, taking yourself too seriously. Point is race is a very loosely defined word because it has no genetic basis for which to classify people as different. Besides that,…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 12:33 AM
1

Those who worship Islam are a race. Seriously just look up the definition of race. Race has no genetic basis. The closest thing that comes to a racial classification is the phenotype, usually of someone's skin color. But so many questions arise from that. I mean did white people in the south really hate black people because of their skin color or did they hate them because of what they had grown up being taught about their culture, behaviors, and religious background? Same thing applies to every…
/r/MensRights06/08/16 03:50 AM
1

That is the definition of the word... Do I need to tell you to look it up? It is not a redefinition.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 03:25 AM
1

Do you know the fastest way to disqualify yourself in an argument? You must since you're so good at it. stupid...paid shill...little Gamma...Moron... Somehow I can manage to go without insulting you, even though you have absolutely no content in your comment, and yet you cannot. That's actually why I asked how old you were, anybody that isn't in high school or below should be ashamed of themselves. Anyways, point is you lost the argument. Racism isn't limited to the color of your skin, if you kn…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 09:20 PM
–

Do you know what race is? Let me help you out there then. each of the major divisions of humankind, having distinct physical characteristics. "people of all races, colors, and creeds" a group of people sharing the same culture, history, language, etc.; an ethnic group. Race is not defined by skin color. No surprise someone who can only resort to calling names wouldn't know that.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 03:09 AM
1

Oh boy, the old "It doesn't happen often so it's not a problem". No, it doesn't happen often so we don't have to prioritize this problem. Homelessness and suicide are much bigger problems among men than false rape accusations. I dare you to state this to the face of all the male teachers and care workers of children who lost their jobs due to something as simple as a false rape accusation. All of them? How many would that be? Really? You don't find her tendency to proclaim women as PRIMARY victi…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 10:24 PM
1

Look, I don't know where you live that Atheists and Liberals bash on Christians. The only time I could see that happening is when Christian conservatives are running for government on platforms that are trying to overturn Roe v. Wade. Feminism and BLM attempt to oppress (and when we say oppress are they really oppressing? I wouldn't call a cell phone video of a girl yelling at some white kid oppression, anyways) people against them because it appears to them that everyone else is irrational and …
/r/MensRights04/08/16 09:46 PM
1

Honestly, I expect the media to lie a bit. It's in their nature. But I've never see anything quite like it. Then you just haven't been around long enough. 4-8 years ago the media was against the left and it was plastered all over the media that Obama is a Muslim and he's not American. Before that it was Bill Clinton and the blowjob. The media only reports on what people want to hear, it's inherently tied to their earnings. I've watched Donny's speeches and I've watched Hillary's. I can't stand h…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 09:34 PM
–

Then I'll be blunt: Don't start complaining when, one day, you are falsely accused of rape. You don't need to get laid to have someone smear your reputation and your basic rights trumped (no pun intended). Well you do need to be in a room alone with a girl who's a little nutty. When you look at all these cases of women with false accusations they're pretty obviously crazy. Just stay away from them. When Hilary becomes president, expect a resurgence and re-emergence of the feminist movement. If a…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 08:34 PM
–

In my opinion, Trump doesn't have it out for Mexicans. Here's why: Mexicans aren't the only people crossing illegally. That hasn't stopped him from using "Mexicans" and "illegals" interchangeably. The man has no filter and in this case it's made him a obvious bigot. He has used the word Mexican when he meant to say illegal and vice versa. Even if he's not a racist I don't like that he's appealing to all the southerners and mid-westerns that are racist. I used to live there and racism is rampant.…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 08:01 PM
–

So now you're saying he didn't run a negative attack campaign. First of all, why should he? To win. Second of all, Bernie knew full well that he was getting fucked by both the DNC and the mainstream media. If that's the case then it doesn't appear he was aiming to win was he? He was the better man for not having gone that route. Sure he's a great guy, love him. He still lost. Clinton lost among voters under 45, including women under 40. That doesn't mean every woman under 45 voted for Sanders. B…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 07:42 PM
–

After everything you said... Tell me, can you blame yourself for moving towards Donald Trump? Donald is an idiot. He has no policies and he has no interest in men's rights. I used to think he was funny because a video some guy made of Donald smashing on Jeb!, but after you watch him enough you see he's just a hateful bigot. I have seen past the media talking points and smear campaigns, this guy has no idea what he's talking about. He sounds like a moron. I was hoping his AMA could turn me over, …
/r/MensRights04/08/16 07:36 PM
–

I guess for you the real issue is Islam and it's not racist to bash on everyone that's a Muslim. Ironic that your username contradicts one of Donald's policies, banning porn.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 07:23 PM
1

Trump has factories in China and avoids paying taxes in his home country as much as possible. How is he not a globalist? Call Hillary a man-hater as much as you want, it doesn't make Donald a man-lover.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 07:21 PM
–

That's not exactly what Trump said. Oh get out of here. I know what he said. He tiptoed around the issue but he's appeasing to the people that want that. How many times does he say the famed line "people are saying" so he can say some dumb racist shit without claiming responsibility. The only people that want to ban Muslims and Mexicans are racist assholes and people scared shitless by the media's non-stop reporting on terrorism and violence when we live in the most peaceful world yet. The only …
/r/MensRights04/08/16 03:08 PM
–

Bernie also refused to bring up any of the things that might disqualify her as a candidate on national television. He sat backseat to her the entire time because he didn't want to step on any toes. He ended up reforming the Democratic Party and now he's out. It's hard to say he was aiming to win in the first place. poor uneducated Democrats and old women who voted for vagina There are plenty of young people that voted for her too. She wasn't going to win on the baby boomers alone...
/r/MensRights04/08/16 02:50 PM
–

How to beat Hillary: Vote Trump...usurping the throne illegally... What the fuck are you on about? "Hey guys, here's how we're going to stop corruption in politics: by banning all Muslims and Mexicans from entering the country!
/r/MensRights04/08/16 02:48 PM
–

Yea. But that's been said and done already. Another option would've been not to hold back during the debates and actually attack Clinton on her weak points and being a stronger debater, Bernie didn't do that. If you're a liberal and you think voting for Trump is a good idea then you're just stupid. He doesn't represent any liberal ideas, nor does his party. After his recent attacks on the military I'm not sure his own party is willing to vote for him.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 02:39 PM
–

Winning by the smallest margins, with the bare minimum effort, is not an option. It's the only option. The mere fact that so many people are voting for Trump just because he wants to kick out immigrants and possibly overturn Roe v. Wade is representative of what a good portion of the population cares about. That is not what the Democratic Platform represents and it will never represent those things. If people are voting for somebody racist and sexist then what makes you think they would vote Dem…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 02:30 PM
–

She's now essentially running neck and neck against someone that isn't even a politician. Mm, not really. She's pretty much guaranteed to win the election. There are about 3 states that are in the middle and she only needs to win one of them while Trump needs all 3. Colorado is one of those states and many doubt it's even considered a swing state anymore. She's out spending trump at a ridiculous amount to stay neck and neck. Perhaps but she's also promoting the Democratic Platform unlike Trump w…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 01:38 PM
1

Introduction I looked into the things you said and while my opinions on some previously thought facts have changed, my overall opinion on climate change, not global warming (I made sure to be specific in my original post), remains the same, especially what we should be doing about it. I'll explain why my opinion remains the same in my conclusion at the end of this post if you just want to skip there. First of all, the entire discussion about global cooling/global warming/climate change is a blat…
/r/MensRights26/07/16 05:51 PM
2

I respected him because he made some very strong arguments for men rights and against feminism. Now that I know about his baggage he's too volatile to associate with anymore.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 07:32 AM
2

Here we go. Well I would assume that research does cost money. But of course you need to insinuate that their results are false because of who funded them. If that was the case, then that means every scientific study done around the world from many different countries and scientists was also funded by corporate interests. You wanna see some climate change? Go to any heavily populated area and look at the thick layer of smog surrounding the city. Even if the aspect of global warming turned out to…
/r/MensRights26/07/16 05:07 AM
0

Yup. If people read the shit he writes on Breitbart they might feel less inclined to follow him and his ideas. He mainly just picks up any topic that the fringe audiences care about, picks a few quotes and statistics that will stump you if you don't have available statistics or quotes that contradict it, and rides that shit to the bank. Something I doubt a lot of people know is that he's a possible climate change denier. At the very least he believes people that reject climate change should be t…
/r/MensRights26/07/16 04:19 AM
3

I've lost a lot of respect for Milo with his completely unfounded endorsement of Trump and other recent debacles like this one. For whatever reason it appears his explanation for support of Trump is that he's anti-politically-correct. What a horrible excuse. What makes him think that Trump is going to do anything for men or freedom of speech when all he's been doing is suppressing the left as much as they've been suppressing the right?
/r/MensRights26/07/16 02:31 AM
1

Did you even try to read the context behind that? Does it really look like I'm trying to say that? Jesus Christ.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 09:58 AM
2

Everything you said is spot on. I was pretty pissed about it. Not because I wanted to learn something (it was a gen. ed.), but because I kept trying to figure out what the course was about for the first two weeks (it was a 4-week summer class). All he would ever do is lecture us about life and how the real world is (we were all adults I'm not sure who he was speaking to). It turned out to be a speech class but a typical day in his class and you would've never guessed. He never spoke about the me…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 02:15 PM
–

It sounds like some people are finally coming around to the idea that paying attention to the issues of men and the problems they face is not a threat to the equal status of women. Well I think anything else would make the person sound plain stupid. BUT, there are still professors that are completely outrageous feminists. I had a communications course I had to take and this teacher was an outraged black man who had a chip on his shoulder for every topic you could think of. He spoke so fast and n…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 12:13 PM
–

I would say the teachers and vast majority support feminism by default. But generally it's not that extreme. If you bring up men's problems like suicide, hazardous work, and likelihood to be murdered you'll generally receive understanding and an come to an agreement that it is a problem. Almost no one is going to deny those statistically backed things. But the wage gap still persists strongly with almost no one to speak against it. I saw an anti-rape poster for women in the men's bathroom and pe…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 10:27 AM
2

Maybe if it always and consistently worked both ways...they wouldn't be so quick to support the gender equity laws. Why not just skip that part and jump straight to the conclusion. All of these equality laws, scholarships, etc. are stupid. They should all be gotten rid of. You're trying to teach some sort of lesson here and taking the long route around the problem. You're trying to solve one problem with another. Solve both the problems at once.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 03:46 AM
–

That's a policy that makes sense though. A policy that would address the suicide rate of men makes sense. A policy that addresses the rate that women attempt to commit suicide makes sense. Lowering insurance rates for different demographics of people in a capitalistic society doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 02:11 AM
1

at this point we can only do the same for men. For policies that actually make sense. Lowering insurance for men or women based off some notion of equality is stupid. Lowering the rate that men commit suicide is a policy that makes sense. Lowering the rate that women attempt to commit suicide is a policy that makes sense. Do things that makes sense. Get rid of things that don't.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 02:10 AM
1

I acknowledged that. Go fix that. Stop putting band-aids on the problem. Lowering insurance prices for men is a band-aid.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 02:08 AM
–

What is your point?! The solution isn't to make men pay the same for auto-insurance, not as long as the insurance industry is unregulated and anti-socialistic. Women shouldn't be paying the same for medical insurance either, plain and simple. Why would we change policies for men when it's a negative for women? Why would we change policies for women when it's a negative for men? What you're suggesting is the MRM should compete with feminism. What needs to happen is to have feminism back pedal out…
/r/MensRights20/07/16 03:36 PM
–

That's what I just said. Complain about women paying less on the ACA. Don't complain about men paying more for car insurance.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 01:52 PM
–

I'm aware of that. Complain about that, not this.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 01:20 PM
–

Seriously. This sub gets delusional sometimes. It's a fact that men cost car insurance companies more. The same way women cost health insurance companies more. You may not be a bad driver but that doesn't matter, it's insurance. Men in general probably aren't bad drivers, they just take a lot more risks than women.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 01:39 AM
–

"socialism" is viewed with such suspicion is because it doesn't work. Every person I've ever heard say this points at Europe, with its great education and healthcare system, and says "see it's not working." Really? It's not working because they're in the middle of a recession, Greece fucked the Euro up with their overspending, and they just took in a shit ton of immigrants. What they have in Europe is not socialism: In most cases, it's a liberal capitalist welfare state Liberal capitalist = soci…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 02:21 AM
–

alternative really is that Hillary Clinton would be elected instead. . . . That would be building a house out of fire. Let's not act like HRC is the death of America, she's a continuation of what's been happening for the past 8 years. There aren't gunna be any political revolutions with her, life will carry on in the same way it always has. The most worrisome part of Clinton's presidency would be her hawkishness and how she decides to interact with other countries. Only under a Trump or Sanders …
/r/MensRights17/06/16 02:16 AM
–

Trump, especially, represents is a move away from PC culture in all its forms, a giant middle finger to the people who are trying to dictate to all of us what we can and can't say. Uh, no he doesn't? In many cases he is one of the people that works with those people and supports their efforts because it benefits him. He has never officially backed anything specific without turning around on his word the next week. He's just like HRC but more likable. if you think he really is as racist as everyo…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 01:33 AM
2

I think you overestimate the number of people on here who are "trump supporters". Generally, surveys of this sub have found that half or more of its subscribers consider themselves left of centre. The Trump folks might be more vocal than others, but not necessarily more plentiful. Yea, you know you're probably right. I do see posts on here occasionally that reflect my observation but now that I think about it, it's more likely that I see Trump supporters on /r/the_donald appearing to support men…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 01:27 AM
–

I think most women who don't identify as feminists feel that way because they genuinely recognise that feminism is a destructive social force, one which hurts them in many ways as much as it hurts men. The same way some men don't want to identify as MRA's because a lot of MRA's sound like neckbeards, mainly complaining about their struggles dating?
/r/MensRights17/06/16 01:23 AM
–

I think electing either one of them would send the right message: that there are large numbers of people who are no longer willing to allow the political and media establishment to dictate our cultural conversation. But is that really what people are going to pull out of it? It's not like men's rights is a hot topic in politics in any way. People, especially socially-liberal people, are just going to view it as a return of racism and nationalism in America.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 01:18 AM
–

Yea but does conservatism actually do anything for men? No, not at all. Does it have any intention of reversing any laws put into place that negatively effect men? No. In fact, it's the same party that, even with house majority, approves those stupid laws.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 01:03 AM
–

I see that as a result of him not wanting to be associated with MRA related controversies. Not because he's against aspects of the movement. For the same reason many women don't label themselves feminists for fear of being grouped in with crazy feminists.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 12:50 AM
–

I agree but it has been my observation that the men's rights movement, especially someone considered a leader in the movement Milo, is leaning towards conservatism for the sake that, in their eyes, conservatism represents the white male like no other movement does. Which, while it may be true, does not mean it advances any of the white male's interests, especially in regards to the social issues that concern this sub.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 12:41 AM
–

Women make 77 cents for every dollar a man makes for the same work with the same background.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 11:04 PM
0

Lol have you even seen my comment history?
/r/MensRights12/06/16 02:32 AM
–

Na I was just commenting on your behavior. This sub is growing but it's going to shit in the process. For some reason the people of this sub think Donald Trump stands for men's rights or some shit among plenty of other bad pr moves for the sub. Men's rights is following feminism right down the drain.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 12:26 AM
–

Hysterical was putting it softly.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 08:37 PM
–

Hey I see some latina chicas in there!
/r/MensRights22/05/16 06:36 AM
–

Last I checked, she isn't the main character...
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:23 PM
7

True. But you get a lot farther by assuming pretending the other person is respectable until they prove otherwise you got what you came for. That's business. Respect is a lot more complicated than that.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:13 PM
13

Yea....NO. Respect is not the same thing as common courtesy. I will treat you with decency but respect is a different thing entirely.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:11 PM
–

Regarding Trump, I'm aware he has a deeper plan I was just generalizing and the general consensus has been just that, I thought it would be relatable. I think he's pretty funny and his sub serves as a good source for my daily dank memes. I would be ok prosecuting false accusers but ONLY when evidence has been uncovered that proves ulterior motives or complete impossibility that the rape could have occurred. No exceptions. That line has to be drawn. You have swerved my opinion but the definitions…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:45 PM
0

Better 9 rapists walk free than one innocent man be convicted of rape. This is my point exactly but rape is entirely based off of whether the woman consented or not. Yes there's plenty of evidence usually like assault or battery or a witness or semen etc. But there are also cases that a person is raped by a family member or they were drunk or it was a child an no penetration took place in which you must rely off of testimony. Of course most criminals are repeat offenders so they'll probably fuck…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:26 PM
–

(because the general consensus already agrees that you should need to prove intention and action to carry out a false accusation, criminally, not simply fail to substantiate your claims) I totally understand what the consensus is but no one here actually thinks about the process behind what that would be. Everyone just says "prosecute false accusers" but it goes deeper than that. It's like Donald Trump saying he'll build a wall and the only explanation he has to pay for it is that it's JUST goin…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:11 PM
–

Yea I know but you know with that title IX bullshit the college is just going to kick you out with little to no evidence and wreck your reputation and school career in the process.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:19 AM
1

Your logic is leaking like a barrel of manure. Riiiiight. I'm the one comparing rape to genocide. WHICH doesn't even matter because, ONCE AGAIN, you're missing the point entirely. IF we were going to apply this to genocide, which is fucking stupid but oh fuck it I'll play your stupid game, then here's how it would go down. Country A gets accused of genocide but they didn't actually do it, which doesn't make any fucking sense because everyone's going to know whether you committed genocide or not.…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:18 AM
1

It's not my fault you came into the situation thinking I came straight from double x chromosomes. I really don't understand where I contradicted myself or if you even know what that means. Like YOU said that I said... I said that crime occurs regardless of the fact that you will be punished for it (the first thing you quoted me just now on). regardless of sex. Then I backed this up with an article that shows there is the same amount of crime regardless of punishment for it (the second quote). If…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:33 AM
1

Dude, I'm not defending false accusers or the fact that they won't be prosecuted. And yes that is what I'm saying. If there was no punishment and we were in an anarchic society, the punishment would take place in the form of a mob at your front door. Do not think that I have a double standard against men, I apply the same damn theory both ways.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:10 AM
–

But that's the entire basis for rape cases. I'm not saying I agree with it but if I have sex with a woman she can just claim rape on me. As long as she gets a rape kit done on herself that shows she was penetrated, can prove we were alone for some period of time, and has no condemning evidence against herself, I'm fucked.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:03 AM
3

Exactly what I said but this subreddit gets butthurt about reality. These men would never see freedom again if women didn't have the incentive to plead for their innocence. As much as this sub wants to hate on women, the reality is that it would be much better to have 10 false accusers back on the streets than one innocent man put in jail.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:01 AM
–

Yes actually, my argument isn't that there would be less robberies but that there would be the same amount. My argument is backed in this article. It speaks about how raising the punishment for crimes does not do anything to deter crime. Criminals do not have any sense of long-term consequences.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 09:58 AM
–

Well people rob stores and sell drugs even though it's illegal so that's a pretty weak point.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:46 AM
2

That's what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:03 AM
–

Well if you read my comment you would see... We need a different approach to rape cases entirely.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:02 AM
–

The only sad thing that would result with active prosecution of false accusations would be that you would see fewer false accusers coming forward. Instead, knowing that jail time would be a possible result of their crime, most women would most likely double-down on the victimhood pretense to avoid jail. The only ones who would get caught would be ones that got caught up in their lies This is my point
/r/MensRights14/05/16 02:32 AM
11

This is a bit like wondering if everyone who has sex is going to be prosecuted for rape. Well if you're in college this is a very real possibility.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 01:16 AM
–

Well yeah but is every accuser who's case is thrown out or deemed lacking evidence going to be prosecuted? There is an argument that people will be less likely to report their rape case if they think it will come back to bite them in the form of a counter prosecution. EDIT: People here are more concerned with prosecuting a false accuser than letting an innocent man free. Unfortunately this is how the majority of people think which goes completely against what the justice system is created around…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 11:06 PM
–

Yea but who's going to do that if they're going to get convicted
/r/MensRights13/05/16 10:52 PM
–

But how do you distinguish between a false accusation and a lack of evidence?
/r/MensRights13/05/16 10:33 PM
–

Well not exactly. I mean, you can't prosecute a woman who just didn't have enough evidence to convict a guy that raped her. If you do that then you will have a rape culture because women are going to be afraid there isn't enough evidence to convict their rapist and stop reporting altogether. But if you only convict girls that decide to listen to their conscious like this one, then she's just never going to fess up and you're just going to see more cases like this one, except without a happy endi…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 10:05 PM
–

The court simply did not have enough evidence to convict Luke But once again, this was not a criminal case, so there was no convicting to be done.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 06:22 PM
4

Oh wow, there's the smoking gun. Great job finding that one there. That's a keeper.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 05:44 AM
–

Oh yea I definitely understand there's a lot of rubbing elbows (and sucking dicks) going on in entertainment to get the gigs you need to succeed. That might have been what got her the contract in the first place. Doesn't mean she can play the victim card and say she was raped and hope the judge takes pity on her even though that has nothing to do with her contract.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 05:11 AM
0

I wouldn't know anything about that, but considering what her music focuses on I wouldn't be surprised she was out partying and had some good ol' regret sex.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 04:35 AM
–

Exactly. Rape is shit, it's horrible, but you don't wait until a contract dispute to bring it up. You take that shit to the police immediately, yes the court system is not a pleasant one but it's necessary. It's not about her not being believed, it's about her not having reported it or having any evidence of it on file anywhere until now, 10 years later. As far as I can tell I'm the only one that has questioned the legitimacy of the claims. I'm entirely open to the idea that she was raped, and i…
/r/MensRights20/02/16 03:00 AM
1

No I care about getting downvoted, I like to wave my upvote dick around.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 07:55 PM
–

I see you've got that red pill mentality. How about this. I could give a fuck less whether they think I'm "weak". I was avoiding downvotes and I accomplished that. I've been in that situation before and modesty prevents downvotes.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 06:29 PM
–

I'd hardly call that an apology. That was to make sure they didn't think I was bitter about a mod talking to me and getting me downvoted. More of a courteous response.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:01 PM
–

When did I apologize?
/r/MensRights18/02/16 08:14 AM
2

Hey don't start pulling triggers you shitlord. Where the fuck are the consent papers?
/r/MensRights17/02/16 11:14 PM
–

Why is this being treated as a gendered issue? Thousands of indigenous people of both genders have are dead or missing. It's weird to make this issue about one gender or the other. and I don't see why this is being depicted as a women's issue when it effects men equally if not more. It's really a problem regarding the lack of attention the race is getting overall. Very unfortunate still. I don't see the difference here.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 10:59 PM
10

I just didn't wanna get it in my eyes.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 09:45 PM
1

The trend of laws being created that protect women from problems and not the men who have faced those same problems forever that only recently began to effect women.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 09:28 PM
5

That was my point but apparently that's detracting from all the problems they have.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 09:25 PM
3

Unfortunately yea. But I don't think the mods usually get involved with that here. This was a mod responding.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 09:24 PM
–

Maybe, but I haven't seen that trend.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 06:25 PM
–

As fucked up as that is, I'm just happy to finally receive equality on that front for men. Including the draft, I don't think women should be drafted, NO ONE should be drafted. If the people of your country don't want to fight to defend it then you've got a losing country to begin with. Besides that, we spend billions every year on the military anyways so I don't see how with the technology and equipment we have that we could lose any sort of war even if there were few people manning that equipm…
/r/MensRights17/02/16 07:03 AM
2

Haven't lived out in the country have you?
/r/MensRights15/02/16 02:48 AM
9

The fact of the matter is that, although you are correct demand=supply, the male population is much less desired than the female population. Maybe I give a little too much credit to my male peers and myself, but more often than not will I find women with no hobbies, interests, or skills that are getting 10x's the amount of interest that I, as a very well put together and good looking man, can even come close to receiving. And it's not a matter of lack of approach. I'm just not getting any intere…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 02:14 AM
11

I don't think I've ever laughed in this sub. Usually I just get pissed off, thanks a lot!
/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:45 AM
6

You'd be surprised what the majority of the female population thinks a "hook-up" app is.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 08:36 PM
0

No, this thread just doesn't understand what it's like to live in Japan. Women are largely excluded from the work force there. That doesn't mean men don't have a lot of problems working there ass off there, either. It just means they're both in shitty situations.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 07:18 PM
1

Yea, I mean their economy and education system has blossomed from all the hard work but I know quality of life suffers for a lot of people in that mindset. The "grass eater" phenomenon isn't even what it's been described to be. They're out there but not nearly in the numbers articles would have you believe. There's plenty of normal guys and girls out there, and they're dating. I wanna say there was just one article done that lead to the explosion of "grass eater" articles and stories that got pa…
/r/MensRights24/01/16 07:14 PM
–

Like /u/Evilpundit said, most men don't think or care about divorce conditions until they cross that bridge. There is no MGTOW movement in Japan. Japanese people are very hard working and have very little time to spend with each other. Salarymen sleep in trains and benches because of how tired they are. A lot of them work 80 hours. Women there are not like women here either. Dating-wise probably. But with men working so hard there it's unlikely there's any time for dating to begin with. Women th…
/r/MensRights24/01/16 08:14 AM
–

There's one running for the GOP...
/r/MensRights21/01/16 04:57 PM
1

That whole thread got nuked and currently a lot of the top comments are still people calling her out. Lol sounds like a failed marketing experiment, or not.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 04:51 PM
2

You literally have to look at the study, or listen to someone who has, to find out. The studies are flawed in how they are executed, that's really all there is. The 1 in 5 applies to sexual harassed and that was based off questions like, "have you had drunk sex before (including with a bf/gf)" and "has someone grabbed your ass without permission before". The study also found that 1 in 5 men were also sexually harassed. The wage gap study from the CDC doesn't look at potential reasons for women e…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 10:55 PM
1

It really did!
/r/MensRights04/01/16 09:10 PM
–

Or he could try NOT starting shit with his in-laws...
/r/MensRights28/12/15 08:56 PM
-1

DAE stick their dick in a pencil sharpener??
/r/MensRights02/12/15 06:43 PM
–

Well yea I was trying to see what cultures he's lived in and how they differed. I'm not grouping all foreign people into one group and americans as the opposite. Just wanted to hear his experience.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 04:14 PM
–

That was really insightful, thanks, I'll put that information right next to "don't stick my dick in a pencil sharpener."
/r/MensRights02/12/15 02:08 PM
–

Are foreign women different? Of what ethnicity?
/r/MensRights02/12/15 01:43 PM
–

That's why he should've called the cops hours before. Even with her in his room screaming and hitting him he should've made the call then. Everyone on this sub is so terrified of the Deleuth model and think it means and instant life sentence without any shadow of a doubt. I have called the cops on several women before on domestic violence and in none of the cases was I immediately considered the aggressor. You have probably a 50% chance at worst that cops will pin you as the aggressor. Usually t…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 09:52 PM
1

Definitely. By no means was it a pleasant situation or something he should've had to deal with, but calling it rape is grasping for straws. It was a real shit situation though. Even though things could've been handled better it still sucks that it happened.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 09:10 PM
–

What you think he was forced on his back and she held him down with her weight? He mentioned she was submissive and in his description of the sex acts it was obvious he was the one doing the fucking for at least part of the time. At any point he could have stopped. He wasn't being forced to do anything. He fucked her until he came. That's active participation.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 08:22 PM
1

I scared you with hyperbole on the internet Well I'm more upset that the same behavior got me banned from /r/askwomen but I don't think anyone here would be surprised by that. unless you're offering Stop. I care he's hurt and needs guidance And I like to question people's motives and reasoning. We have different approaches to online forums. Many women will report men for that And that's they type of shit I call out because it's stupid that as a person you don't know how to say "no" to someone. I…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 07:00 PM
1

It's all quite hypothetical hyperbole Not in your context. You are clearly going after some sort of scare tactic. sometimes they kill people men Because there's no way in hell an average sized woman is going to be able to more than adequately resist a cop or any average sized man. where the female acts passively Once again, this sub doesn't understand. A female more than likely with or without resistance is going to get raped. She is easily going to be overpowered regardless if she tries fightin…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 06:46 PM
–

Basically, OP's just too much of a pussy to admit it. From what it sounds, he did the fucking.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 06:37 PM
–

people have all sorts of reasons not to defend themselves He actively participated in sex. He could've simply left the house if he wanted to avoid violence altogether, or just kept his door locked. How is he going to pitch his case to the police department? "I had sex with a drunk girl who pressured me into fucking her and she was submissive so I had to do all the work" "...So you raped a drunk girl?"
/r/MensRights20/10/15 06:29 PM
0

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3pg1i1/too_hard_to_talk_about_with_my_friends_i_was/cw6ll7k?context=3 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3pg1i1/too_hard_to_talk_about_with_my_friends_i_was/cw6k0mm?context=3 You OP and some other idiot. Hard to say I'm the one making threats landing in the group of idiots.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 06:26 PM
2

Actually if you don't know who I am and I fly out of the country before you can report it'd be easy to get away. Just leave you duct taped up in your basement with a water bottle, it'd be days before you got free. It's not a crime if no one can catch you. Wow you went from assault to attempted murder and kidnapping real quick didn't you? Very happy the mods encourage this type of behavior here. pound the crap out of drug fueled imbecile Ah, so our drunk, stupid girl has now been compared to a dr…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 06:24 PM
–

AND WE HAVE NUMBER 3! 3 people who would rather cause harm to me than have a discussion. Keep it up you proud, proud idiots.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 05:36 PM
–

It's too bad he wasn't "sexually assaulted" or "raped" when he was in full control of the outcome of the situation. Yes, he was the "man" and he had every option to back out whenever the hell he wanted. He forfeited fighting with her and decided to have "unwanted sex" instead. On the side of "victim blaming" I could hardly call giving sound advice to someone "victim blaming". These are all things he SHOULD have done. Instead he raped himself with another person's body. He chose to have sex with …
/r/MensRights20/10/15 05:34 PM
-1

Ha! Another person making empty threats at me! This sub is full of you quick-to-anger goons! No, you wouldn't shove my phone up my ass because that would be assault and you would go to jail for 10 fucking years. I like your creativity though! Once again, restraining someone isn't violence. Besides that he was fully capable of pushing the bitch out of his room and locking his door again if he was so scared of calling the police. Scared of violence? Yea, call the fucking police. Your point is void…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 05:30 PM
-1

Ha! There's your machoism kicking in! Where was that when you got "raped"?! Maybe you should have asked her if she wanted to fight!
/r/MensRights20/10/15 05:15 PM
-2

No surprise someone with a "victim mentality" would lash out at any criticism of their horrible excuse of a defense. Making threats of violence? Maybe you were right not engaging with her, you probably WOULD have hurt her or killed her even. In before everyone says I'm victim blaming you and you're not responsible for the stupid shit you say.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 05:08 PM
–

However you choose to interpret what he should or shouldn't have done, you cannot dispute that he had the option of not having sex. Not involving the police was his greatest mistake.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 05:06 PM
–

You're doing a great job upholding the men's rights movement, refusing to participate when it suits you. Keep it up and I'll get to watch another thing I care about get flushed down the drain by a horrible, uneducated community.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:59 PM
–

Because of her, and what she can do. Is there some magic power I'm not being told of? http://i.imgur.com/eJfmc6K.jpg ^ This is how you restrain someone, they can't do anything. Unless this girl knows some judo that she can still execute correctly while drunk she's fucked. You still had the physical advantage on her and you could've thrown her out of your room and locked the door again if you didn't want to have any involvement. It will I'm not a spineless, coward who lets people push me around a…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:55 PM
–

The point of this subreddit is to change these things! As they currently are they do not support men! The law is designed around women being assaulted not men being told "Only if you fuck me". You aren't a MRA, you are solely an "anti-feminist" who's only goal is to do the same hypocritical things back to raging feminazi's that they portray to you. That's going to get you laughed out of the building the same way feminists get laughed out when they talk about sexist A/C. How many posts do I see o…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:49 PM
–

Look, you're more scared of what people "could" think instead of what they would think. Everyone in the damn house knew she was going around fucking things up. You had your damn door locked and let her in. Instead of calling the cops while you had been nowhere near her as of yet, or leaving the house altogether, you let this idiot into your room. You didn't have to break her nose to fucking restrain her. If you know you could've laid her out what makes you think you couldn't have held her down b…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:40 PM
-1

You already had witnesses to her extreme behaviour! You said yourself there were marks on the walls and doors from her fucking shit up! You're more scared of the horror stories you've read online of police and the Deleuth law than what would have actually happened!
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:33 PM
–

HAHAHA, you don't seem to understand that rape laws are not created with men in mind! The laws almost only apply to women! IT'S NOT EVEN SECOND DEGREE RAPE! against the will Yea it was totally against his will. She FORCED him to have sex with her right? No she didn't. She begged him for dick long enough until he gave in. Unwanted sex is not forced sex.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:31 PM
–

Maybe you should read it then, it'll give you some incite to how ridiculous this situation is. I don't victim blame but you could hardly call OP a victim when he willingly raped himself with her body. Besides OP, you shouldn't blame the victim but you can definitely point out how their irresponsible actions had led to what resulted in their attack. If I drive through downtown Baltimore you would say that was a stupid fucking decision.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:28 PM
–

Oh yes I fucking would. The only exception being if it was a woman she would more than likely be unable to defend herself. THAT'S WHAT THIS SUB DOESN'T FUCKING GET.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:23 PM
–

There's no legal exception that says that the capacity for physical resistance disqualifies the event being classified as rape. Which is why, to some degree, there should be. For a woman, it can be assumed that had she even attempted to resist, it would have been futile. Which is why male rape cases such as the one above get laughed out of the building. He was fully capable of stopping her and chose to rape himself with her body.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:13 PM
-2

Sub wonders why they don't get support and then they go off and support shit like this.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:11 PM
–

So leave the fucking house if you're so scared of being falsely accused. Stand outside and call the police to get the fucking loon out of your house.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:10 PM
–

Explain then how. How were you unable to tell her to get the fuck out of your house or restrain her physically.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:08 PM
–

Imagine this, you couldn't say no to a girl because "who the fuck knows" and then you had sex with her while she was still drunk. I'm not saying she was raped but I am saying you put yourself in your horrible situation. Take some responsibility for yourself. I would've rejected sex plainly on the fact that I don't want to be falsely accused of rape.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:07 PM
–

So you're saying in a crisis that if you make a stupid decision you're suddenly devoid of responsibility? You know that sounds an awful lot like what 3rd wave feminism is pushing. What a lot of the people in this sub don't seem to understand is that unwanted sex is not the same as rape or forced sex. How can the people of this sub go around saying that men and women are equal in different way and that feminist are stupid for trying to make things 100% equal when he clearly could've fended her of…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:04 PM
–

Jesus fucking christ you guys act like he's incapable of defending himself! Of course he shouldn't be hit in the first place but that's where he can charge her with assault! You guys really like to think that because women can be threatened with violence from a man, that for men in general the same applies. Unless the woman has a weapon or an unusual physical advantage on you (tied up, woman on steroids, extremely large woman) you are at the advantage and are fully capable of defending yourself.…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 03:41 PM
–

Just the drunk thing. 19 isn't underage. I suppose he could report it but it was a really a matter of him not being able to say no and I can't stand that. There was a study done on college women that after having taken a class on consensual sex and not being afraid to say "no", "rapes" went down. I feel like a lot of the rapes that get reported nowadays are young, drunk women regretting sex in the morning. Drunk people will have sex, it is known and it is not wrong to do so. If you don't want to…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 03:01 PM
–

Honestly she could make the argument that she was drunk and that he raped her. I would leave it alone and not risk getting myself in trouble. Besides that I don't have much respect for people who can't say no. I don't consider drunk sex rape and I don't consider someone pressuring you into sex you don't want rape, as a man or a woman. No, this is one situation where he should have manned up and told her to get the fuck out of his house before he called the cops. The whole situation would've take…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 02:19 PM
0

At what point did I declare it was a crime? Is it a crime to wear a trenchcoat? No, but you'd look fucking weird doing it.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 08:16 AM
–

Depends on how you do it. There's a correct way to do it and a "I dressed like shit and made a shit attempt at hitting on someone". One results in an uncomfortable shit situation.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 03:38 AM
–

This story is more harmful to this subreddit than it is helpful or insightful. Bad examples lead to people calling out your bad examples. We need good examples and only good examples. Yes, men should not have to have a "guilty until proven innocent" mindset for themselves, but bringing up an example of a mentally ill man who later went on to hit on the woman and make the situation uncomfortable only proves that he should have been in that mindset to begin with. Edit: You guys don't wanna listen …
/r/MensRights15/10/15 02:49 AM
2

Neither are right though. Yes contaminated social science research is wrong and so is what could be extremely biased experience from some business woman. Neither work sufficiently well. You can look at a study and see what they did wrong when controlling factors and set up a new study that will account for those. Someone's experience in the field that comes with so many caveats and external factors is just as worthless as the bad study. People will just take what matches their agenda and roll wi…
/r/MensRights07/10/15 09:38 PM
0

Yea, saw the title and thought, "It's still a joke in America though..."
/r/MensRights02/10/15 11:48 PM
–

Shit
/r/MensRights10/09/15 12:27 AM
–

Who the fuck told you to stop having emotions and feelings? You're just being oversensitive. The toilet seat falling and hitting your dick is a rare but possible occurrence. It's not like somebody did it to the kid. The humor, although a bit over the top, was standard procedure for a commercial.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:14 PM
–

This is my vagina
/r/MensRights08/09/15 06:46 AM
1

Bahaha wtf
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/15 09:29 PM
5

HOW CAN SHE SLAP!?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/15 07:18 PM
2

I did read the article. In fairness the article had many good points and was overall agreeable. However, excerpts such as the one above diminish what points it had already made. Liberal and Democratic are not the same thing. Nonetheless, if every sjw is a liberal that doesn't make every liberal a sjw.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:00 AM
–

No?
/r/MensRights05/09/15 01:40 AM
–

No because it's a stupid blanket statement with absolutely no evidence to back it. Throwing Democrats and Republican under one umbrella or the other is the equivalent of calling every man a murdering, rapist pig or every woman a gold-digging slut.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 08:48 PM
–

Well I mean the coal factory is more efficient in comparison to the pollution per watt it produces. But yeah you're right, add in the efficiency of the power lines to the tram station and the efficiency of the tram itself and you end up with just about the same result. Still it's nicer having the pollution away from the city at the very least. L.A. is awful, first time I went there I thought it was fog, didn't understand why it had color.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 06:46 AM
1

I am not disgusted by the video and I'm glad it looked like the guy wasn't too harmed, but I would appreciate some consistency in their responses. None seem to follow my point.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 07:31 PM
–

My problem isn't that she's a woman and he's a man. Really this is just another stupid internet video. My problem is that upon showing this to any female I know, their immediate reaction becomes "yes he deserved it." The problem with this logic is regardless of whether or not he deserved it, this was a felony and you would go to jail for it. Not only that, but you could be sued for personal damage as well as damage to his reputation. What people don't understand is that this is a crime. To top i…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 10:32 AM
–

My problem isn't that she's a woman and he's a man. Really this is just another stupid internet video. My problem is that upon showing this to any female I know, their immediate reaction becomes "yes he deserved it." The problem with this logic is regardless of whether or not he deserved it, this was a felony and you would go to jail for it. Not only that, but you could be sued for personal damage as well as damage to his reputation. What people don't understand is that this is a crime. To top i…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 10:32 AM
–

I don't even know what the hell feminism is anymore. People keep saying there's normal feminists out there but I don't know who they are or what they're fighting for. I feel what's a larger problem than feminism is men's passiveness to their own existence. Every male friend, colleague, and co-worker I've talked to about our own issues in society has brushed it off as "that's how it is." Men's rights have no representation from the very people it seeks to protect. None of my friends care that we'…
/r/MensRights16/08/15 02:05 AM
4

dig and build
/r/MensRights14/08/15 06:50 PM
–

I think it's bullshit and it's not so much a "men started it" or a "women started it" as it is a problem with human culture in general that we should all (both genders) work together in dispelling.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 05:58 PM
0

HAHA! Was not expecting someone to have been in the same situation as I.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 12:15 PM
1

The problem isn't that they can't do it. They have to contact a lawyer and provide evidence that the famous person is the father and take it to a judge. It's not exactly easy to do that and it takes a long time. Paternity tests aren't the only way going about determining the father. If the judge thinks she's full of shit he'll just throw the case. Same rules don't apply to normal people. However, either way if the man doesn't end up responding to the case after a certain period of time it will r…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 07:58 PM
–

Yes, it does happen. Just not many people are shitty enough to do it and then actually collect child support. You have about 2 years from birth to dispute it and after you're fucked.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 06:40 PM
1

Yup
/r/MensRights11/07/15 06:39 PM
–

The bigger problem is that if a man doesn't get a paternity test within the first two years and the woman secretly put him down as the father on the birth certificate, he is legally bound to pay child support even if later on it is proven he is not the father. THAT'S what's fucked up.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 07:55 AM
35

Was this not satire?
/r/MensRights07/07/15 04:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter