TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nieralgia Archive

View 0 posts and 18 comments by nieralgia on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

For women suffering from serious cervical dysplasia or similar dangerous pre-cancerous conditions, where there's a real non-theoretical risk (not like in the case of testicles, where it's absolutely not proven) of premature death ... imagine the outcry if some man gave his unsolicited advice that they should just remove that "reservoir of death" and he doesn't understand why they keep it. How can you entirely ignore someone's desire for bodily integrity and sexual & reproductive health? Btw, I h…
/r/MensRights01/06/24 01:07 PM
3

Her smugness barely conceals her underlying horniness. She obviously has a castration fetish. Which would be fine if it was restricted to consensual, non-harmful (!!) play in private.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 12:56 PM
9

Why is this woman paid real money for her fetish LARPing?
/r/MensRights31/05/24 09:38 PM
0

The Vietnamese immigrant women probably had bad sex. They weren't allowed to get pregnant. Seriously, I don't make this up. So much for the socialist sisterhood.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 12:10 AM
2

The following may be a bit controversial but: Claiming social causes are responsible for an observed effect, while it is to a large degree biology, is nearly as bad and repressive as the other way around. Take cerebral palsy as an example, which is correlated with mental disability (for physiological reasons). This is a mere correlation, there are geniuses with cerebral palsy. Now imagine one would postulate as the cause for this effect a “culture of anti-intellectualism” in cerebral palsy suffe…
/r/MensRights29/05/24 11:57 PM
3

Honestly, absolutely not true. The English-speaking world has calmed down, but this nonsense is still very much alive in parts of the Western world dominated by other languages.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 11:24 PM
1

The fact that some hemotional whiny dude mansplains to me that a bear is more harmful than a man using “scientific facts” 🤬, discounting my lived experience and my expertise as an ursinologist, proves that you should choose the bear, ladies!🐻 PS: that sounds all too real, satire is dead
/r/MensRights29/05/24 11:21 PM
3

More like feminism. At least it needs a strong, healthy society to nourish itself – which it then undermines.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 11:33 PM
1

Devaluation, yes… but not just as dumb and lazy as in the 00s. Instead, men are now relentlessly attacked as defective and dangerous. 🐻 And if you complain about getting stereotyped because of your gender, you're called sexist. Or you get the "NotAllMen" reply, as if repeating an argument in a snarky manner was some sort of clever refutation.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 11:23 PM
17

“If you don’t fight, you can’t win!” (Eren Yaeger)
/r/MensRights28/05/24 10:18 PM
1

If you believe that every society with men involved ended up with women being oppressed and subjugated, you’d have to believe male nature is inherently evil or inferior to women if you genuinely believe this. Well, men would be morally inferior but superior in power. But patriarchy theory is inconsistent, unproven and unfalsifiable. If the patriarchy was at all serious, women wouldn't have any rights by now. Don't give me the ridiculous explanation, “we fought hard for our rights”. A really oppr…
/r/MensRights28/05/24 10:08 PM
8

Suspicion is an understatment. The feminist / liberal orthodoxy did everything to mock, shame and basically destroy the emerging men's rights movement of the 2000s. And they largely succeeded. As a result, rather problematic actors filled the vacuum now. But yeah, men aren't punching bags, seriously. It's simply not sustainable. At least it's not for debate anymore that feminism can be hateful. But very regrettably only in a roundabout way, i.e. acknowledged for terfism and trans women (which ho…
/r/MensRights26/05/24 05:29 PM
1

There are of course different versions of feminism, but I've yet to see one that isn't based on unfalsifiable constructs like patriarchy or rape culture. Feminist postulates aren't backed up by any evidence, and there are way simpler alternative explanations. Like that past gender roles, as oppressive as they were, didn't mainly come from the desire for power and subjugation, but were to a large degree necessary for social survival, since liberating technology simply wasn't there. So feminism ca…
/r/MensRights26/05/24 05:08 PM
9

I'm really done with it. But my ambitions shouldn't be channeled towards the ascension to NEETdom (I have a saving rate of >50%) but having a family.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 10:09 PM
21

It's always: "I want a man who makes my life better than if I were single". This sounds reasonable and not like overly high standards. But often it turns out they're hypersensitive to problems and quirks of the men they're dating (which everyone has to some degree) while disregarding positive attributes. Which makes them feel like they are better off single.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 10:03 PM
5

The reasoning is like: "50 % of the billionaires in the US are Jewish. Therefore there must be an International Jewish conspiracy!!!"
/r/MensRights18/05/24 09:45 PM
2

Even if those studies weren't as obviously ridiculous, they should be rejected because they are some large-scale enterprise in bulverism. 100000 studies and monographs that research why men don't believe in the patriarchy, yet not one that makes a consistent, evidence-based argument for its existence.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 09:35 PM
2

Yeah, they say that. Until 30 seconds later it is "Male: The Lowest Difficulty Setting". (which that Scalzi bozo still defends after ten years).
/r/MensRights18/05/24 09:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter