nightauthor Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-1	Man changed name on his CV to a female name and got 870% more responses for an interview. I think it’s a class and race issue, for middle class white ladies everything you said is true. But as you move away from that demographic, they get hit with the racist and classist behaviors worse than their male counterparts	/r/MensRights	12/07/22 02:00 PM
41	Imagine if this was the other way around If they’re that nuts, I’m physically removing them from my place.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/05/22 02:26 AM
4	Imagine if this was the other way around Given his setup, it’s more like GF-I’ve-been-with-and-generally-liked-up-to-this-point passes.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/05/22 02:24 AM
3	Pay yo taxes bitch And the US, it's a felony and we have mail police.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/11/18 08:52 AM
1	That's 7665 days. Its a very good point, and goes with my general sentiment the jury system simply cannot work well. We are too easily biased and tricked by things that simply arent true. Someone else pointed out that a jury of randomly selected general public will on average be less biased than a group of professional jurors paid by one side or the other, and that professional jurors would have trouble keeping the facts of each trial seperated in their mind having sat in on so many cases. So, I'm not sure what t…	/r/MensRights	06/01/17 03:09 PM
0	That's 7665 days. I am vastly oversimplifying it because even with just my current knowledge, its a extremely complicated system with issues at every single step of the process. And still, there is much about the system that I have yet to learn. For the sake of not writing a book in the comments here, I'm distilling my thoughts to what I can type in a couple of paragraphs. I wrongly interchanged pro-bono for public defender. The rest stays the same, supremely underfunded and doomed to failure with their high work…	/r/MensRights	05/01/17 08:16 PM
1	That's 7665 days. Ok, obviously I didnt read the article. But even given what you said, his conviction was still based on her testimony, which contained at least 1 lie, so she is directly responsible for his incarceration. A 21 year incarceration, based on an inadmissible testimony.	/r/MensRights	05/01/17 06:13 PM
10	That's 7665 days. That is definitely the direction I lean.	/r/MensRights	05/01/17 12:36 PM
2	That's 7665 days. Well something has to be done to fix these issues: -Stupid jurors can be easily confused -Jurors can be easily manipulated -Uneducated jurors can fail to grasp scientific consepts even if laid out in fairly basic terms. -Jurors will fall to their most basic prejudices without so much as a true understanding of what a prejudice is I'm sure I'm missing some important stuff here, but somethings must be done to incentivise jurors to pay more attention, think more deeply, and not dole out convictions…	/r/MensRights	05/01/17 11:46 AM
2	That's 7665 days. The thing for me is that, I'd rather let people free who are guilty. Than to lock people up who are innocent. I think we can all agree on that, but the issue comes down to how much do we value the innocent not being locked up. How many guilty would you set free to keep an innocent free? For me, a lot! but I think its too hard for people to think about it, and so they simply dont, and we get the powerful making money off of the incarcerated, rigging the system to put more people in jail, and keep…	/r/MensRights	05/01/17 11:30 AM
-6	That's 7665 days. Jury nullification is illegal or talking about it is... something like that.	/r/MensRights	05/01/17 09:03 AM
19	That's 7665 days. The big question is: Where do we draw the line on innocents being jailed? 1:100? 1:10000? How many bad people should be set free, to make sure 1 innocent isnt put in jail? What if you were that 1 person? It just seems to me, that there should be virtually no doubt that someone is guilty. And if you have 12 people all agree, no doubt, then put them away. But it doesnt seem like something that should be done by the general public. It honeslty should take some smart, very rational people to do this…	/r/MensRights	05/01/17 08:38 AM
15	That's 7665 days. ... you kinda have a point there. She's now what... 34? Send her to prison for... (34-18=).... 16 years. Sounds fair to me.	/r/MensRights	05/01/17 08:18 AM
53	That's 7665 days. What about cases with a jury? Hold them accountable? Might not be a bad idea, make jury duty compuslary, and maybe they will take a second to think about what the fuck "Without a reasonable doubt" means. It baffles me... you should be something like 95% sure someone did something to convict them. 12 people all 95% sure, its like 0.0000000000000244141% chance you convict an innocent person (This is strictly speaking as if we were all computers capable of rational deduction)	/r/MensRights	05/01/17 08:17 AM