TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nikQXOdZSPL0BIh Archive

View 0 posts and 77 comments by nikQXOdZSPL0BIh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I think we're using different definitions. When I say "justification" I mean "a legitimate reason to do something." When you say "justification" you mean "the reasons people give to justify their actions." Both are acceptable definitions, but they are different meanings. People can give any reason they can imagine to "justify" their behavior, that does not mean that behavior is truly justified. You can murder your neighbor and justify it by claiming the mushroom men in your basement told he was …
/r/MensRights06/01/22 04:48 AM
5

There never has, nor ever will there be, a "hygienic" justification for male genital mutilation. That is entirely gaslighting and post hoc rationalization by the ignorant and willfully malicious. There is zero evidence of any hygienic benefit to any population at any point in history, and there are no ancient sources that claim hygiene as the motivation for the practice, and it flies in the face of common sense (all mammals evolved a prepuce (foreskin), in both genders, and lived in dirt for mil…
/r/MensRights05/01/22 10:10 AM
2

Hey friend, I want you to know that I know exactly how you feel. I went a year without speaking to my parents because I knew if I did I'd say something like this. I just want to say, think it over. For me, I passed through these feelings and came out the other side. Read Ron Goldman, he talks about how it is even therapeutic to feel these things as deeply as possible, without trying to shut them out. For me, it still pops up from time to time, like especially when I read disgusting nonsense from…
/r/MensRights05/01/22 09:59 AM
4

I have infinitely more respect for her than I do for someone who defends MGM and stands against FGM. She has a functional brain, and she's using it to make logical conclusions. Conclusions I disagree with, but at least she understands why she believes what she does.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 02:27 AM
41

Whenever someone complains about FGM and wants to screech about how MGM is nothing in comparison, remember that this is happening. Everywhere little girls are getting cut, boys and men are being cut too, with the same kind of brutality. The only place that discriminates in genital mutilation, is the enlightened and progressive First World.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 07:56 AM
12

Do not forget that these people want you broke, dead, your kids raped and brainwashed, and they think it's funny.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 10:59 PM
10

Don't have to imagine. Look at how people respond when there's even a hint of women feeling "shamed" for their genitals. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nqr5wBXydkQ
/r/MensRights12/12/21 02:09 AM
1

Shocking.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 02:06 AM
8

As a guy with a dong, I will say dicks with huge bands of discolored scar tissue all over them and dry wrinkled heads are gross. Almost like we should let people make decisions about their own bodies for themselves.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 02:06 AM
5

Lmao, this is some next level retardation. "Reducing bloot clots" what the fuck? I thought I had heard every bullshit made up justification for male genital mutilation, but that's a new one even to me. Congrats, I guess.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 11:50 PM
5

QUI?!
/r/MensRights11/12/21 11:47 PM
6

I literally can't think of anything more misandric than thinking that men (and only men) deserved to be enslaved and killed.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 05:18 AM
1

Conservatives are losers, quite literally. The only thing they ever do is lose ground. The radical of 50 years ago is today's conservative. And for issues like men's rights, they are mostly diametrically opposed to the MRA sphere. Perfect example in the recent fight over including women in the draft. Conservatives are aligned to preserve the traditional responsibilities of masculinity, with none of the privileges (which have already been lost to culture and legislation), and to maintain the priv…
/r/MensRights09/12/21 06:45 PM
1

Let us do a thought experiment. Let's imagine there is some part of the female genitals which we can amputate to "no effect." Do you imagine that you could gain widespread support for such a practice? No, because the fact is the effect is irrelevant to these people. Female genitals = sacred, protected. Male genitals = dangerous, dirty, worthless.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/21 06:38 PM
1

The argument about "we should allow [x] thing, because if we don't it will only get worse" is never an argument in good faith.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 06:32 PM
2

People will accept, without any evidence, the claim that FGM is barbaric mutilation, without health benefits, perpetrated solely to control female sexuality, when there's solid evidence to refute all of those ideas. Yet they will reject out of hand any evidence that MGM has any negative effects at all.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 06:31 PM
5

You're taking a rather negative view of the posts there, there is a decent amount of support for anti MGM sentiment. Most of the negative responses are of the type "Don't bring men's issues into this female discussion," rather than being pro MGM. Regardless, I personally can't muster much outrage about FGM. Sorry. There's a lot of fucked up shit that happens in oppressive shitholes. I can't spend every waking moment agonizing over it, especially when I can't do anything about it, and ESPECIALLY …
/r/MensRights06/12/21 06:19 PM
2

Daily reminder that you can: Literally castrate a boy; Rape him and his young brother, force them to molest each other, and film it; Force the boy to take hormones and live as a girl; Drive both brothers to eventual suicide; And your punishment will be: Literally nothing. Your theories about sex and gender will become the foundations of modern feminism and much of American and Canadian culture and law. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money
/r/MensRights03/12/21 03:32 AM
7

It literally is not.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 01:57 AM
1

Because if the parents are going to want it done, it's "better in the van then on some rock in the middle of a field" of course.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 04:39 PM
1

How is it misogynist to want to spare a girl the harm of having her genitalia mutilated "on some rock in the middle of a field," if we can just provide her parents the safe and legal option of having it done in a clean and sterile hospital or under the supervision of trained medical profressionals?
/r/MensRights29/11/21 08:34 PM
2

Do you want me to to explain the ways you are trying to do a textbook talk around of this issue with semantics instead of actually having a "good faith" discussion? I mean, I know you don't, because you don't actually have a point and are trying to baffle us with bullshit, but I will anyway. Equating all FGM = cutting off the clitoris, when removal of the external clitoris is a very small percentage of FGM done worldwide. Implying you have spoken to women who have been affected by FGM, when you …
/r/MensRights29/11/21 08:31 PM
3

Yeah and what you're trying to do is play bullshit word games when I literally just told you that 82% of Egyptian women support FGM.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 04:28 PM
1

The point _____________________ Your head.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 04:26 PM
1

Nothing wrong with female circumcision. Change my mind.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 07:51 PM
5

Because you're a liar who has never actually spoken to any women who are victims of FGM. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3134892/ "Previous studies have demonstrated that almost all Egyptian women (97%) have been subjected to FGM. In the current study, up to 82% of the women supported the continuation of FGM."
/r/MensRights28/11/21 07:49 PM
1

Did i stutter.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 07:42 PM
2

Like clockwork. Not a jab against you per se, but this discussion is like a broken record sometimes. So don't take my word for it, Brian Earp is a lot smarter than me and he lays it out here. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1078529309478838272.html https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1079164114784714752.html
/r/MensRights24/11/21 09:39 PM
3

Good bot.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 01:37 AM
4

Post it so we can tell you exactly how it's bullshit.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 01:35 AM
18

I don't want to make it sound like a meme, but the american Cope about mgm is absurd and would be funny if it wasn't tragic. Europeans: What the fuck, how could you do that to someone, let alone your own child? I would absolutely hate to lose my foreskin. Americans: What's the big deal, despite not having any frame of reference to know what I'm missing, I like it better this way, and definitely would have chosen it for myself if I ever had gotten the choice, which I am glad I never got to make.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 01:33 AM
9

The implication being, of course, that any cutting of female genitals is "mutilation," and conversely, that no amount of cutting of male genitals will ever be considered "mutilation."
/r/MensRights24/11/21 01:29 AM
10

To be honest, female circumcision is much more brutal than male. No it isn't. The vast majority of fgm cases remove none or a tiny amount of tissue. In some cases the entire clitoris is removed. In some case of mgm the entire dick is removed. Google David Reimer. Google subincision. Watch videos of African tribal circumcisions. The dick at least still 'works' after circumcision, although an important part is removed. The vagina still "works" after normal fgm as well. Female circumcision is rare …
/r/MensRights24/11/21 01:25 AM
5

Who gives a fuck about parental consent? The only person qualified to give consent about how much of their own genitals they want to keep is the person who fucking owns those genitals.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 06:44 AM
3

agreed, and this is why FGM needs to legal
/r/MensRights22/11/21 06:41 AM
1

If you start looking at all of these things through the assumption that they are meant to destroy, not improve, society, it will start making more sense.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 01:24 AM
3

What the fuck are you even trying to say
/r/MensRights15/11/21 02:40 PM
20

Why is it always absurd projection with these people? "If women didn't exist men would leave their babies by the side of the street." Jarvis, lets run the #'s on "# of children aborted by women vs # of children killed by men over the last 50 years"
/r/MensRights14/11/21 01:59 PM
3

lmao "You really think someone would do that? Just go on the internet and tell lies?"
/r/MensRights14/11/21 01:36 AM
3

For most people, there is no logic involved in this discussion, that's the thing. Approach it from any logical angle and the only reasonable conclusion is that it is an absurd tragedy of human rights. But people can't think about it logically because, for societies that practice it, the overwhelming majority of the population is either victims of perpetrators of it. So, because logic leads us to only one conclusion; that you are either a victim, perpetrator, or both, of a heinous crime; and beca…
/r/MensRights14/11/21 01:21 AM
2

And remember this all started when his penis was amputated during an attempted circumcision. But nobody ever seems to ask that first question, why are we OK with cutting up the genitals of little boys in the first place? Because the true answer to that question, from which all these other problems stem, is that men are not considered fully human.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 06:45 PM
1

I get that you've haven't, that's why i provided you an actual example of it. As well as examples of how men have their genitals cut up based on other people's preferences, and how this is fully accepted as "normal" by our society. So I'm sorry if you're having trouble putting 2 and 2 together.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 06:38 PM
2

Lucky for your cutters, that pesky statute of limitations expires just as you would start being sexually active!
/r/MensRights10/11/21 02:01 AM
11

You're going to get downvoted because you have no idea what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 01:58 AM
3

Precisely. This is why FGM should be legal, btw.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 01:56 AM
15

And yet, all forms of FGM are banned. Really makes you think.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 01:54 AM
1

You need to work on your reading comprehension, because you are very confused, and no where did I imply that men don't love pussy. Here, I'll provide an example of exactly what I'm talking about, where a woman complains about how she sad she is and the video discusses the horrible social pressure women feel to have "pretty vulva" without a hint of any self awareness or irony for what happens to men. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nqr5wBXydkQ As to your second sentence, there are articles online…
/r/MensRights10/11/21 01:50 AM
1

Have you really never heard the hysterical screeching about terms like "roast beef curtains"? I agree that no one should be shamed for their genitals, but when you have one side that is, at worst, occasionally having to put up with a joke about the appearance of their genitals, and the other side has their genitals literally carved into whatever image someone else (their parents/God/doctors/society/women/etc) think is "preferrable," without regard to the preferances of the owner of said genitals…
/r/MensRights05/11/21 06:29 AM
25

Women feel like they have "social pressure" to have "pretty" labia and genitals = the greatest crime ever committed Men have half the skin of their penis and most of the sensory nerves non consensually amputated the day they're born = normal and good
/r/MensRights01/11/21 07:10 PM
6

It's not a good article, but your comment is equally stupid. The vast majority of women who are victims of FGM will say that is has either not affected them sexually or that is has actually improved their sex life. Does that make it not a tragedy when a little girl is forcibly circumcised?
/r/MensRights31/10/21 01:38 PM
19

This isn't anything new. The left has been preaching "equality of outcomes (equity)" for decades now. Giving people equality of opportunity leads to inequality, because of the different choices people make. But by equity logic, any inequality is taken as de facto evidence of discrimination, even if that discrimination is impossible to ever identify or quantify, and thus warrants not only compensation to the "oppressed", but discrimination against the "privileged" group.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 09:27 AM
3

What the fuck is this shit?
/r/MensRights24/10/21 02:37 AM
3

What's wrong with circumcision for females
/r/MensRights15/10/21 05:14 AM
2

What a superfragile society. If circumcision is done correctly, as it usually is, there are clear medical advantages at almost zero cost. The fact that some women may feel "damaged and incomplete" is anyway the killer argument these days. "I got raised in a religious family and I was never asked". My god...
/r/MensRights15/10/21 05:13 AM
3

That's a lot of words to say nothing.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 04:44 PM
3

I must have forgotten when it was they asked Me for my consent. Seems pretty damn mandatory to me.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 08:51 AM
2

Couple things: Men do care, for example there are tens of thousands subscribed to the Foreskin Restoration subs, and that's just subscribers on one niche sub on one site, so the actually # of men who aren't happy about their cut penis is probably orders of magnitude higher. Why don't more men speak out? Because once an evil becomes large enough, social order demands that we make it invisible. There are about 330 million Americans (dealing only with Americans right now to make things simpler), so…
/r/MensRights05/10/21 12:35 AM
2

What other body parts are you willing to cut off of your son so that he "fits in?"
/r/MensRights05/10/21 12:29 AM
2

You have no idea what you're talking about, and you're spewing meme bullshit.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 12:32 PM
1

What a coincidence, I have the lowest opinion of feminists imaginable.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 01:41 PM
3

Step 1: Take one quote (lie back and think of England) of dubious veracity, that could AT MOST be applied to an extremely small segment of society (British aristocracy) and an extremely small period of time (Victorian England), and is in no way representative of the views of the broader population of the even the same time and place, but in reality is actually just a commentary on the views of ONE INDIVIDUAL PERSON; Step 2: make broad, sweeping generalizations about the state of gender relations…
/r/MensRights25/09/21 01:32 PM
2

"gullible" Lmao. They know exactly what they're doing.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 01:38 AM
5

It would have cost you nothing to protect him and his rights and his whole body. Just don't do it. It's that easy. Instead you made a conscious decision to deprive him of his rights and his natural intact body. Do you understand?
/r/MensRights06/09/21 02:38 PM
24

You deprived your son of the right to his whole and natural, intact body. Seems like a men's rights issue to me.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 04:37 AM
2

Then I spit on my hands, raise the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 05:27 PM
71

Classic feminist Motte and Bailey tactics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy) are to claim that feminism helps everyone (men included), then when challenged with how feminism actively harms men, retreat to saying "well duh, of course feminism is for WOMEN"
/r/MensRights29/08/21 11:32 AM
1

There are societies with over 350 million people who routinely practice FGM? Name them.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 11:50 AM
1

I'm happy I was circumcised ( my opinion, doesn't have to be yours ) the few girls i know that weren't circumsized were constantly made fun of and I knew guys that complained of the smell and appearance.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 11:44 AM
1

Because that's not the issue. As seen in many examples in this very thread, these are men who want to defend MGM, and they will just come in and say something like "I'm glad I was CUT!" As if that's the end of the conversation and we all need to shut up about it because they personally are fine with their victimization. How would we react in a discussion about FGM if a female victim of FGM came in and said "I'm glad I was CUT!" Like, "ok, good for you, but we're having a discussion about the fut…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 11:43 AM
2

Brb performing preventive mastectomies on all infant girls to prevent breast cancer. Update: am in prison.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 11:36 AM
2

Replace it with "Jews" for maximum lols
/r/MensRights21/08/21 08:52 PM
1

The entire anglosphere has practiced it, to varying degrees, for most of the last century.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 03:59 AM
1

Notice how it does it again here, where he states some meaningless platitudes and things that are meant to elicit agreement, but if followed logically are actually in direct opposition to his position. The essence of pilpul is to baffle your opponent with so much bullshit that it is impossible for them to form a coherent counter argument, because nothing that you have offered makes any coherent sense, as displayed in the comments above.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 06:10 PM
1

Amazing pilpul from this guy in this whole comment thread. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilpul
/r/MensRights14/08/21 03:13 PM
2

Men in much of the developed world are taught, on the day they are born, that their consent is worthless, when their sex organs are permanently mutilated.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 11:46 PM
3

You could make a case for it thousands of years ago no you couldnt, and they didnt
/r/MensRights10/08/21 01:28 AM
1

Express my anger about the fact that my genitals were scarred and mutilated without my consent.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 09:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter