TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nikdahl Archive

View 2 posts and 409 comments by nikdahl on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

They make women feel safer. Thats the whole point. Feelings.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/07/26 01:38 PM
9

No, They were subverted by people trying to profit. They popped up as organic activism. Red pill, incels, mgtow were all legitimate (and righteous) movements before they were demonized by feminism. Once that happened, there was an exodus of good actors that didn’t want the labels feminists were ascribing to the movements. And that is when they started being co-opted by right wing groups, and the bigotry and misogyny started flowing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 10:55 PM
11

Nah, other direction. Did De Beers pay this person to say this? Wedding rings are completely unnecessary and a waste of money.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/06/26 06:28 PM
6

You say this as if the algorithms don’t literally manipulating men to take part in the manosphere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/26 08:37 PM
19

For me, it’s to communicate the point that men’s rights are not a far right position, and are not antithetical to left wing politics. And to attempt to view egalitarianism through a left wing lens that is not feminism. It’s an uphill battle, but I’ve never shied away from doing what’s right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/26 07:35 PM
14

Wasn’t there a well researched post here recently about the feminist bias in academia?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 05:53 PM
7

This study shits all over women’s agency and infantilizes them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 04:06 PM
3

Is that an actual quote from the study you are criticizing? Because the specific wording is important there. “Women have more to fear” is an incorrect conclusion, but “women have more fear” is a likely conclusion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/26 12:28 PM
46

Zara Larson tweeted I've said it and I'll say it again. Man hating and feminism is two different things. I support both 😊
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/26 08:34 PM
7

TikTok is basically a misandry propaganda app at this point. FTFY
/r/EverydayMisandry05/05/26 10:01 PM
0

If my grandma had wheels, she’d be a bicycle.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/26 08:12 PM
-1

If you cannot understand that a retracted accusation is better for the accused victim than an active accusation, then this conversation is going no where. I require logic from the people I discuss with. We are leftists. We believe in harm reduction, not retribution.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/26 07:29 PM
-2

It is the preferable that false accusations never come to be. That’s why there should be punishments for them. If a person falsely accuses, they would still be liable for civil damages and social damages. Restitution should still possible, just not criminal penalties. There are plenty of crimes that have no punishment with reporting. Many pollution laws for example, tax reporting errors, false advertising, etc. It’s actually quite common.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/26 06:27 PM
-1

You are strawmanning here. Prosecutors frequently provide sentencing reductions or immunity for cooperation and turning yourself in, so I’m not sure what point you think you are making. The issue here is that if you do not provide amnesty for false accusers, they literally have no reason to tell the truth. They will take their lie to the grave, and with in, the accused life is forever ruined. If you give them an out, then the accused at least has some chance to recover and repair their life. Hav…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/26 06:09 PM
-11

An accused life with no recantation is ruined forever. An accused life with recantation allows for rebuilding. Yes there is lasting damage, but it is preferable to having an active accusation over your head. This is true for both celebrities and regular people. And in this case, it is still preferable that she withdraw the complaint, rather than going to court. Even if the accused wins in court, there will always be the question of whether the accusation was true or not, because court outcomes a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/26 06:03 PM
-14

No, I want strict punishments for people that have been proven to be lying. And I want people to be able to freely recant their accusations without fear of punishment. You would clearly prefer that false accusers take their lie to the grave with them, forever ruining the man’s life? Always give your enemies an exit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/26 04:52 PM
-22

I’m so glad that she wasn’t charged. The last thing you want is for false accusers to think they will be punished if they tell the truth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/26 02:58 PM
7

Of course Reddit isn’t a space for free speech, they ban hate speech rightfully so. I think you need to take a break from the altogether though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 04:06 PM
9

I think you’re in the wrong sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 03:27 PM
50

All men are privileged, as are all women. Because privilege isn’t absolute. You can be privileged in some areas, while others may have privilege over you in other areas. That fact is lost on so many people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 03:25 PM
12

I’ve personally heard all those arguments before. They are each easy to pick apart on their own, but you cannot change a persons entire entrenched world view easily. Especially when it’s being reinforced by all your social circles.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 10:08 PM
5

2 is completely backwards. Being able to use your body like sex workers can is a privilege.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 05:01 PM
16

Internalized misandry is a huge issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 07:22 PM
5

Both gender’s roles are mostly enforced by women. And that’s the reason.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 03:13 PM
2

Legalization is all I will accept. Many on Reddit will say that legalization increases trafficking, and I say, that’s a solvable problem.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/26 03:56 PM
12

This is a very Eurocentric take. Circumcision is extremely popular in Africa and the Middle East, and even some Asian counties like South Korea and Philippines.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/26 07:09 PM
25

It’s pretty funny when they start calling you an incel for being critical of feminism. When you make a statement like “I’m absolutely steadfast in my belief and activism for women’s rights” and they lose their minds.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/25 05:36 PM
6

Don’t use incel as a pejorative. That is outright bigotry.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/12/25 08:49 PM
1

I don’t ask you to prove a negative. You obviously have some harms in mind that you don’t believe are hostile and are itching to argue. Spit them out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 04:02 PM
-1

You should be able to provide examples that people commonly think of as hostile sexism that are actually not. Because it is your claim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/25 10:19 PM
0

You’re the one that made the claim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/25 08:54 PM
0

You think it’s hard to find examples of hostile sexism against women in the real world? That’s a wild claim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/25 07:37 PM
7

Menslib only pretends to be egalitarian, when it is clearly not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 06:54 PM
1

Comes off as fully delusional to me. And mostly uninformed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 06:51 PM
11

That’s not been my experience.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 03:03 AM
28

Not only that, but they’ve made the label “nice guy” toxic in some contexts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 01:26 AM
19

Taking the word “incel” and changing the meaning so that they can use it as a pejorative to shame male sexuality (as is tradition) Or body shaming language like “small dick energy”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 03:50 PM
7

“Conversation” what a fucking joke
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 03:11 PM
9

It’s pretty disgusting to see the double standards from conservatives on this topic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 03:09 PM
5

Here’s the thing. It wasn’t recklessly thrown around. It wasn’t hyperbole. It was intellectually lazy. It wasn’t simplistic. It doesn’t diminish the actual horrors associated with. It doesn’t hinder productive debate. It’s not unfounded. It’s not an extreme comparison. It doesn’t derail the conversation. It is not just an emotional reaction. That’s because he was a fascist. People use the word Nazi instead of fascist and that’s annoying. But the guy was a fascist, and it shouldn’t be so jarring …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 03:07 PM
0

Yeah you fucking did.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 03:00 PM
1

Not paying, loaning. I agree with right wing gets on that. It shouldn’t be a handout, it should be a loan, so that the mother, the one who chooses whether to bring the child into the world, is the one fully financially responsible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/25 04:12 PM
2

The government can play that role. Offer a parental replacement loan, which is available for 18 years and repayable at age 18. Done. Now the mother can make her own choice, the child is provided for, and no one has to suffer due to someone else’s choices.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/25 04:03 PM
6

As if the government never makes loans to people that need money, too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/25 04:00 PM
1

No, literally get. The. Fuck. Out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/25 10:41 PM
8

The data supports the idea that this is a gendered problem. Male loneliness is experienced differently than female loneliness. Sorry you aren’t better informed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/25 05:34 PM
1

You’re in the wrong sub then.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/25 05:32 PM
5

No shade if you need to use Ai for a disability. But I’m not going to read it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/25 06:06 PM
7

Not really. A man doesn’t choose to be an incel. That is a matter of circumstance, not a choice. The “woman” in this context is not a specific person, and it is therefore not about a woman’s agency either. And it also does not at all imply that sex is the only reason for existence. Frankly, your perspective is bordering on toxic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/25 04:38 PM
9

Sure, if the Ai made a good point and was effective at it. But that is not what this post is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/25 10:18 PM
23

We don’t want to read your AI’s response.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/25 08:05 PM
71

The term “incel” being used as a pejorative is a clear example of misandry. And people completely ignore that fact.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/25 08:28 PM
14

“Don’t have to suffer through victim blaming like women do” What? You mean like what you are literally doing right now? Blaming me. For not pushing their rapist off? For getting hard?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 07:46 PM
-1

…who isn’t getting paid.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 06:58 PM
3

I really enjoy Second Thought YouTube channels Marxist socialist content.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/25 07:43 PM
10

Not as rare as you think.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 03:11 PM
9

What is it that you think DEI is? And what is your personal experience, or how close are you to the actual policies?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/25 12:13 AM
4

Pro Jew nazis exist and those terms are not mutually exclusive. Zionists can be nazis.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/25 03:18 PM
2

Since always. Lean just means low body fat.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 02:56 AM
2

I see now. If that is the claim you are trying to make, then saying "women, in general, prefer leaner builds," isn't the way to do it. Because that would imply that women prefer scrawny men to muscular men, which is not at all the case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 11:14 PM
1

I don't get my science from youtubers though. But I also don't think this video is making the same claim that you are. The studies linked in the description don't seem to. Maybe I misunderstand your claim. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2017.1819 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35179485/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 11:06 PM
2

What studies? I only see studies showing the opposite.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 10:33 PM
5

All one has to do is listen to a single podcast of his and it will be demonstrated. The guy is dumber than a brick.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/24 11:47 PM
14

Theo von is a fucking moron. You will make yourself stupider just by listening to him. I don’t know who Galloway is but don’t really care. I can tell you that looking for commentary on men’s issues is a losing game. Don’t look to entertainers they will almost always be there simply to make money and manipulate you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/24 05:24 PM
7

This seems to belong more in /r/rightwingmaleadvocate
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/24 04:41 PM
27

I’m an atheist, socialist, nonmonogamous, queer, male advocate. Majority of people will have a poor perception of each of those labels, so I keep just about everything about myself to myself. Reddit is literally the only place where I’m free to communicate openly and honestly without fear of judgment or excommunication.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/24 11:29 PM
16

You should stop liking Rogan. Dude is always stupid.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 06:13 PM
10

That doesn’t track at all in America. These activities consistently derided by the left as indicative of having small penises
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/24 11:59 PM
6

Firearms and 4x4 trucks are similarly shunned as unacceptable forms of masculine interest.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/24 11:27 PM
-4

Guardian is a great journalistic organization.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 04:55 PM
14

I think it was a riskier move than you suggest.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/24 11:37 PM
9

I’m actually surprised you have a men’s network at all. That would never happen at any of the companies I have worked for.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/24 11:28 PM
7

They you talk to your state labor board about the toxic workplace that your employer has failed to correct.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/24 11:27 PM
1

To which I respond “and women uphold and support patriarchy too”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 02:32 PM
20

Conservative men’s groups, I imagine. But I’m interested to hear as well
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/24 09:45 PM
31

Let’s not make this into a debate about circumcision. But I will tell you that FGM takes many different forms, some are much less intrusive than male circumcision. And yet all forms of FGM are outlawed. So yes, they are directly comparable and absolutely should be piggy backed. Equality is important.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/24 02:59 PM
1

I just typed a long list of reasons why he is conservative/libertarian to another user. The other user was able to rationalize it all to themselves and ignore the evidence, and maybe you will too. You can check it out if you’d like.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/23 03:24 AM
-2

Man you really have a boner for the guy, huh? He said DeSantis would make a good president and was proud of what he’s done in FL. He hasn’t voted for a Democrat in the past four presidential elections. He called Canada communist and Trudeau a dictator. He spreads all sorts of misinformation, including Covid. He supports police and strong military. He gives a platform to the worst of the right. Rails on “cancel culture”, and I won’t even get into his numerous racist remarks. He’s a conservative/l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/23 10:23 PM
3

I don’t think that necessarily makes him a democratic socialist. The dude is a conservative, and is a populist. If anything the guy is just extremely ignorant on political topics, and doesn’t really have the intellectual capacity to build a rational political perspective. You also have to remember that socialism has many aspects that are very attractive to right wingers that are pumped full of propaganda that tells them that every aspect of socialism is evil. Theres a great deal of overlap. If R…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/23 10:01 PM
2

I don’t think it’s hard to call Joe Rogan a right wing conservative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/23 09:25 PM
0

Liberals do be idiots.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/23 03:39 PM
18

Science is starting to understand the long term effects that extreme trauma has on the brain, even in infants. Circumcised adults may not "remember" the event, but they still carry the trauma.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 04:19 PM
8

You completely misread OPs comment.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 04:37 PM
7

Reduces risk of cancer? Skin cancer. Should we remove all breasts at birth to reduce breast cancer? Should we remove earlobes surgically at birth? That also reduces skin cancer risk.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 04:35 PM
4

So, you cannot find any examples, huh?
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:16 PM
9

Women vote more than men. They are the ones choosing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/22 03:30 PM
16

He looked dazed and dizzy. Rock got hit, it just wasn’t a full strength slap.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 06:55 PM
7

I thought I was hilarious when she came out after and was “what did I miss? Why is the vibe so different?” But yeah, in general.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 06:54 PM
-12

There is nothing on the video showing them punching a kid.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/20 10:57 PM
3

I would never vote for a candidate just because she's a woman, and I don't think anyone else should. I don't have any firm numbers of course, but it seems to me, any sexism that keeps women back from a position like President is more than replaced by sexism that specifically votes for her because she is a woman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/20 04:11 PM
1

In terms of equality, it doesn't matter
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/20 07:17 PM
6

Women are vote in higher numbers than men do. If anyone is to blame for male leadership, it's women voters.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/20 12:14 AM
7

How many would deny the Patriarchy or Rape Culture? How many would support financial abortion? How many would support the draft for women? How many would support longer jail sentences for female offenders? How many would support mandatory DNS testing to confirm parenthood at birth? Outlawing circumcision? It's easy to say that feminists want equal rights for men, but when you get into the actual policies, they start to back track. Feminists love the IDEA of gender equality for men, but in practi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/20 11:56 PM
-1

I think you’d be mistaken on that. Circumcision and genital mutilation is conservative.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 12:44 AM
2

I would explain that by giving you the definition of consent. Infants cannot consent. Children cannot consent. It is forced on them every time it occurs. In older ages they may choose, like you did, but the choice isn’t theirs ultimately because they are a minor. And infants especially don’t get any choice at all in the matter. There’s a reason why I said “infant circumcision”, though I probably should have said “underage”.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 09:56 PM
3

Infant circumcision is forced on the infant, by definition. In every case of infant circumcision.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 05:18 PM
0

If it’s a pass, it isn’t cheating, it’s an agreement. It’s only “called” a cheat pass because our language doesn’t have a good word for extramarital sexual experiences. “Cheat” is well understood to be extra marital sexual experiences, but is bundled with the infidelity, dishonesty, and disrespect, where as non monogamy does not have those overtones.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 07:02 PM
1

Of course you can. That’s the idea.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 05:45 PM
0

The truth comes out.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 05:40 PM
-2

A “pass” isn’t cheating. No monogamy isn’t cheating.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 05:37 PM
14

Ask 100 people on the street what percentage of domestic violence victims are men. I bet most answers you get will be less than 20%. Most people don’t think of men as being domestic violence victims, and the 40% informs. You could put “almost half”, which gets the point across too, but this works just fine IMO.
/r/MGTOW23/10/19 11:07 PM
1

Yep, most people would think it’s 80% or women.
/r/MGTOW23/10/19 11:04 PM
1

Cleaning up plastic and reducing greenhouse emissions are not the same goal. One will slow global climate change, and one will save wildlife, and clean the oceans. Why are these two even being compared?
/r/MGTOW06/10/19 04:26 PM
3

Well the department will assume that liability. It doesn’t mean there are no avenues for remedy, it just means the individual officers is unlikely to see any accountability
/r/MensRights27/09/19 12:13 AM
6

Large portions of law are based around reasonability. If the officer reasonably thought something was a crime, they will not be found negligent.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 12:11 AM
13

Wrongful arrest lawsuits pay out pretty well.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 12:08 AM
22

Lol. It was a damn joke. I figured this day and age, manspreading is more of a satirical term than anything, and for that reason this would be read as satirical. Guess I was wrong. I’m leaving it up though.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 07:07 PM
-120

Looks like he’s fucking manspreading though.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 05:00 PM
2

Dope
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/19 02:34 PM
2

Can I suggest to this sub that we ban behavior like this? I don't want to stifle conversation, but this person is obviously not interested in a mature conversation. Discussion in good faith doesn't include name calling like "scumfuck", "cunt face", "piece of shit", "racist", "piece of trash", "low life", "fake". There should be no room for this behavior in this sub. Not to mention the severe lack of readability, punctuation, etc. Low quality, low effort, bullshit all around.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/19 08:09 PM
3

Finally! Self criticism is the only way to effectively operate
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/19 08:01 PM
1

I think they all serve different purposes, and are all misinterpreted by reddit. /r/MensRights is a decent sub, and although most members are well meaning, it doesn't moderate out the blatant sexism and woman hating that can sometimes bubble up. /r/MensLib allows no criticism or feminism, or of the sub/moderation. It's not a place for true conversation if I'm restricted from saying what I mean to say. To be effective, you need to be critical of your self. Plus, there are just as many women in th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/19 07:58 PM
4

Except they don't allow any dissent either. You cannot criticize moderation methods without facing the ban hammer. It's just a shitty sub altogether.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/19 07:16 PM
3

I'm same as you, mostly. I voted for Bernie in the primary, Stein in the general. This time around, I'm going with Bernie or Warren in the primary, but how I vote in the general will depend on who the democrats run. I'm not going to vote for Harris or Biden, and will vote for Trump if they are nominated. But just about any other Democrat will get my vote.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/19 07:15 PM
6

Wow. That’s insane.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 02:16 PM
57

You mean women being prosecuted and not the groping, right?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/19 07:40 PM
3

Not really though. I hear this a lot, but then when I go look at the top times on a bunch of different ultra marathons, and the men are out in front. How long does the marathon need to be?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/19 06:06 PM
1

Paul Allen Institute for Brain Science
/r/MensRights05/07/19 09:13 PM
15

My point is that you make no attempt to condemn the mother in your post, only the father. And the father wouldn’t have been put in that position without the mothers actions, that’s what it has to do with it.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 02:26 PM
12

You think she knows?
/r/MensRights03/07/19 01:29 PM
26

The dad is? Are we going to talk about the mother?
/r/MensRights03/07/19 01:24 PM
0

Is there nothing that would convince you to cut your father out of your life? If you were gay, and your father were homophobic, would that be enough? Verbally abusive? Pedophile? Career criminal? What if he were just an asshole? What if he turned scientologist and wouldn't stop trying to recruit you? The point is, it's not a disorder to cut someone out of your life for reason. Where you draw the line is subjective. For someone with high levels of empathy and morals, I can absolutely see good rea…
/r/MensRights29/06/19 06:04 PM
1

I have no problem cutting people out of my life for being Trump supporters. It's not the politics of it in the end, it's the broken morality, hatred, and bigotry. I won't have people like that in my life. That being said, it would take a lot for me to cut my father out, but it's not out of the realm of consideration.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 10:25 PM
2

Same reason we are so scared of school shootings or terrorist attacks even though statistically the odds of an occurrence are so minuscule.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 03:28 PM
2

The "left" are also at the forefront of several mens rights "movements" like male genital mutilation, and paternity leave, etc. I hear what you are saying, that most of the radical feminists are leftists. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water by making it a left-right issue. It's counterproductive.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 08:03 PM
7

An attractive young mother get punished?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/19 06:26 PM
3

That’s what I’d call toxic femininity too.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 03:02 PM
4

I’m with you though. Hate doesn’t get anyone anywhere. You fight injustice with facts and try to induce empathy. Of course we need to pursue debate in good faith. Don’t shut people out just because they are wrong. You inform them and show them the truth.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 01:00 AM
1

Lol. You specifically didn’t answer any of the questions in this comment: https://reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/buo475/lets_set_aside_the_its_in_my_body_for_9_months/epmf89k You also didn’t answer my question about what the purpose of protected sex is. But you say I didn’t answer your questions, so let’s review. Holy shit, are you actually that dense? Do you really not realize how contradictory that statement is? What risk is there of mass death if the majority of people using these weapons a…
/r/MensRights31/05/19 09:37 PM
1

Let me know when or if you want to actually have a good faith conversation about this. It was clear from the start that isn’t what you were interested in, and to be honest it was also clear you didn’t have the logically ability, but I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt. Clearly that was a mistake. Good luck with life buddy.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 08:55 PM
1

Not a controversial opinion? You’re nuts man. I can’t discuss with someone so irrational.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 08:44 PM
1

Man, you are a really shitty with debating, aren't you. Can you address the points instead of personally attacking me? That and the fact that you are still unable to answer super simply questions makes me think that maybe you're point isn't strong enough to defend? Or is that some other reason you aren't able to discuss this in good faith? I wasn't asking if you'd be on the hook for paying the medical bills, I was asking if you would be physically compelled to submit your body to sustain the per…
/r/MensRights31/05/19 08:11 PM
1

I still believe you’re chasing a logical disconnect. My argument would not be to ban those things because their primary purpose is to kill. I would move to ban those things because the risk for those to cause mass death would be too great, and the reward for allowing them too small. Not because of any silly attempt to categorize the primary purpose of the weapons. But to continue your analogy, there is a purpose of use and a purpose of the tool. I’m might not be using the tool to purposely kill …
/r/MensRights31/05/19 07:04 PM
1

What is the "purpose" of protected sex then? Just curious.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 06:11 PM
1

No, accidents are what happen when driving goes wrong. Accidents happen as a natural consequence of driving. It’s human error and it’s unavoidable. Just like unplanned pregnancy is human error and the risk is unavoidable just like car accidents Accidents happen. At least you said one logical. As a species, we’ve moved past being completely defined by our biology. We have technology to redefine what our biology is. The biological desires for sex can and should be completed logically detached from…
/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:53 PM
1

Driving does not lead to accidents. Driving leads to you getting to your destination. If something goes wrong while you're driving, that's when an accident happens. But the main purpose of driving is not to create accidents. Accidents are a natural consequence of driving. So when you have sex, you cannot claim you're not choosing to risk having a baby, because you are doing literally the only thing on Earth that makes babies. You say that's the main purpose of sex, and I disagree. The main purpo…
/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:26 PM
1

What are you talking about? Every time you drive your car there is tremendous risk, it a conscious decision you make to take on that risk. You choose to drive, it doesn’t just happen to you. It’s no more “accidental” than impregnation from protected sex.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 04:00 PM
1

You didn’t answer the rest of my questions. Your telling me that if a mother crashes a car by accident, and must be physically attached for nine months the passenger alive, so decides to pull the plug because they can’t afford the medical bills, and the quality of life for everyone involved would be significantly reduced, that you would charge that mother with murder? I just want to be clear of where your morals are.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:27 PM
1

Yeah? What if I accidentally put you in a coma? Say, driving to work with you and missing a stop light? What if some equipment I was using malfunctioned through no fault of my own and you ended up in a coma? Like driving you to work when a wheel blows and the car flips? If you do make it through that nine month coma, your family will be burdened with very expensive medical bills until you reach adulthood, and your parents will have to put their careers on hold to care for you, etc. You make it s…
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:19 PM
1

Again, I’m not required to submit my body for your use, even if you need my body to survive. And to decline use of my body is not murder, even if it results in death.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:44 AM
1

Lol sure thing dude. No one is murdering anyone, just not allowing them to continue to exist at the expense of someone else body. There’s a very important difference that you can’t see from all the way up there on your perceived moral high ground.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:58 AM
1

Once the child is born, you can adopt it out or drop it off at a safe spot at any age. At that point the mother and child aren’t biologically attached. The child is no longer entirely dependent on use of another persons body. If it were possible to adopt a fetus out to a willing mother, I would be all for that, but since it’s not possible, then we fall back to the fact that you cannot morally force someone to give use of their body, even to provide life sustaining support. For me, that’s where t…
/r/MensRights31/05/19 01:20 AM
1

I won’t explain your logically inconsistencies to you if you don’t already plainly see it. Bringing is back to the debate, the question isn’t “is a fetus alive” because it is irrelevant. It simply does not matter if it’s alive, some state of not yet alive, parasitic, or fully grown. You cannot force a body to sustain another body. That is wrong at a level much higher than the tragedy of whether or not a life is lost. Not only that but forcing someone to sustain a child they do not want through f…
/r/MensRights31/05/19 12:51 AM
1

The way you describe it makes it sound more like you are looking to assign punishment. The only way I’d accept your argument that consensual sex equals affirmative consent for procreation is if you were to claim that sex should only be for procreation. At least then your argument would be logically consistent. But I don’t think that’s your argument, is it?
/r/MensRights31/05/19 12:05 AM
1

You do lot have to subject your body for a parasite, even if it is human. That’s your body. You are not required to provide your body for anyone else’s use. It’s your body. If you opt to remove the fetus from your body, thats your choice. If the fetus dies it is tragic, but not murder or killing. It’s just a death. The fetus could not survive without using a host body, and the host body no longer consented to the use of their body. Let me give you a hypothetical. Say you have a one of a kind ant…
/r/MensRights30/05/19 11:25 PM
1

force women to either become single parents or get abortions. I'm not seeing the issue here.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 11:02 PM
2

People have a right to their own body. You cannot force me to give life saving assistance to anyone. You cannot force me to continue to give life saving assistance to anyone. So the question is NOT "is the fetus alive?" because that is truly irrelevant. It literally doesn't matter. Even if it were a fully grown person or small child, you cannot force someone to utilize their body to provide life saving assistance. The question here is really "Do people have the right to control their own body?"
/r/MensRights30/05/19 10:52 PM
1

The state can loan this money to the mother and defer the payments until the child is 18.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 09:54 PM
3

My primary reluctance to coming out strongly against circumcision is that I don't want to make my parents feel guilty for what was a very common decision at the time.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 10:00 PM
2

Wrong, monogamy does.
/r/MGTOW22/05/19 10:17 PM
1

Yes, hate for hates sake will always “strike a nerve” Anything you said lost all credibility, and you labeled yourself as a bigoted piece of shit. This sub is not about hatred or bigotry.
/r/MGTOW20/05/19 02:45 PM
-3

faggots Get that shit out of here.
/r/MGTOW17/05/19 07:08 PM
5

”Sexism against men" and "racism against whites" (and a lot of Fox News sound bites) are pretty great signals that whoever parroting them isn't going to argue in good faith or listen to facts and sound logic No it’s not, and that’s a pretty shitty assumption to make on your part.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 11:56 PM
1

Get a bidet and you’ll never want to poop outside of home.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 03:44 PM
1

I honestly don't buy that argument at all. Or at least that it's not provable, and you can't really say with any degree of certainty one way or the other.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 09:30 PM
7

Is a sex doll going to insist on monogamy?
/r/MGTOW05/02/19 04:45 PM
7

You shouldn't hit anyone. There's no reason to not hit a girl specifically.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:41 PM
2

Right, but that isn't the best metric to use for deciding what a "better driver" is. There's traffic efficiency, awareness, courtesy, fuel efficiency, passenger comfort, time efficiency, reaction times, confidence, predictability, etc, etc. A lot of stuff that is subjective/immeasurable is what makes men better drivers overall.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/02/19 08:24 PM
8

Well, she’s quite wealthy herself being one of the first amazon employees.
/r/MGTOW23/01/19 07:08 PM
2

Almost everything men do, toxic or not, is driven by mens biological need for getting our dicks wet. You can't fix the symptom without addressing the cause. And women sexually selecting for these traits is what is positively reinforcing the behavior. You are suggesting that men ignore this innate biological drive to act in a way that is most likely to cause them to be sexually selected and reproduce.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 09:49 PM
3

In a lot of ways, yes, it certainly is. The privilege of sexual selection is very powerful. I would go so far to say women sexually selecting toxic traits is the primary driver of toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 07:13 PM
4

I don’t see them as being separate. I don’t believe you can really decouple the two things. Toxic feminists perpetuates and promote toxic masculinity. But even if you were able to separate the issues, the balance is a shitload closer than what you have in your mind.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 04:11 PM
2

Not to mention CA, NY and TX have many times 665k-679k residents, so the total number of disenfranchised voters is much greater.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 05:07 PM
-1

Even now you are demonstrating your weakness by lashing out. Calm yourself down and read more about stoicism.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 06:04 PM
-1

Someone who deals with adversity by ineffectually escalating situations for no gain is indeed weak. I’m glad you have seen that in yourself. It’s as if you consider anything less than physically wrestling the microphone away from them to be “weak”.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 05:51 PM
-2

Holding confident and not escalating the situation, is indeed what the stronger person would do, knowing that there would be nothing to gain from escalating, and knowing that it wasn’t his rally. Whining, bitching, and fighting ineffectively is what weak men think is “strong”. Sometimes it’s best to ignore and let them dig their own hole. Those women damaged more relationships with progressives and allies that day than Bernie did, that’s for sure.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 05:35 PM
-1

That’s a weak mans idea of being a “simp mangina” It wasn’t his rally.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 05:26 PM
-2

That was the best possible response from him. It wasn’t his rally, btw, he was just asked to speak.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 04:59 PM
-2

Can you show your math there?
/r/MensRights03/01/19 04:56 PM
1

You’re right, it’s totally not fair that one gender has all the biological disadvantages of reproduction. I mean, I haven’t been arriving otherwise, and I don’t think anyone really can argue otherwise. But you keep mentioning things that a mother must suffer through if she births a planned or unplanned pregnancy, and you keep glossing over the fact that birth is entirely, 100% her choice. You don’t get to ask for something and then turn around and use it against someone and bitch about circumsta…
/r/MensRights21/12/18 03:48 PM
1

I’m still just hearing you say that you want to punish men for not suffering any of the biological consequences of a pregnancy. Anything after the point of deciding to abort is entirely the woman’s choice, the man has no impact on her choice. If she wants “give up time, money and physically suffer to provide for a baby,” that’s her choice. She WANTS to give up her time, money, and physically suffer. Either it’s a burden or it’s not. If it’s such a burden, then don’t choose to have a baby. If it’…
/r/MensRights21/12/18 02:51 PM
1

Got it. You’re wanting to add suffering and consequences to the man out of spite women biologically suffer the natural consequences. Make the man pay 100% of the abortion! Just give him a fucking choice in the matter.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 02:05 PM
1

Look dude, the level of pain and suffering associated with pregnancy is entirely irrelevant, tbh. It doesn’t mean you can take away someone’s choice just because someone else suffers or has it worse? Again, full term pregnancy is a choice. It’s a woman’s choice. They don’t have to endure full term pregnancy. Women have the biological disadvantage and legal advantages, and men have just legal disadvantages and even though they are easily addressable, you think men should just submit to female pri…
/r/MensRights21/12/18 03:33 AM
1

Look, if a woman wants to carry a child to full term, that should be entirely her choice. If a woman wants to end a pregnancy, that is also entirely her choice. The man has no such choice, and is entirely beholden to the choices of the pregnant mother, potentially meaning great financial peril for the next two decades. Hell, if a woman doesn’t want to get pregnant in the first place, she has a plethora of choices available to her as well, and men have one choice that is permanent, and another th…
/r/MensRights18/12/18 03:39 PM
1

well ok, it you are givining that as a reason why men shouldn’t be able to abort, and the exact same argument can be used to say why women shouldn’t be able to abort.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 02:13 PM
1

Ok, so what’s your solution? I’m still struggling to determine relevance. You want men to endure some physical arbitrarily level of physical pain to match what pregnant women go through if they decide they want to be the father?
/r/MensRights18/12/18 02:11 PM
2

But what’s your point here? Are you saying that because women are able to opt out of this dangerous and painful process, that men shouldn’t be able to? Or are you saying that because signing a paper to abort is so much easier than pregnancy they shouldn’t be able to abort? I’m trying to understand the relevance of what you are saying, and I’m not coming up with much.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 12:45 AM
2

Don’t worry, you are just going to have to go the rest of your life with diminished sexual pleasure. No big deal.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 12:41 AM
-3

That’s a solveabke problem. Set up a government fund to provide for the child’s needs, and keep a tally of the amount. Then when the kids turns 18, that amount becomes due from the mother. Garnish wages if necessary. That way, if the mother is acting in good faith, it won’t affect the child, nor the taxpayer, nor the unwilling father.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 12:35 AM
8

People don’t typically die from prostate cancer, but the die with prostate cancer. Breast cancer kills.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 12:30 AM
6

Of course they are different. Is that difference in the context of your argument relevant to this discussion? Not really.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 12:28 AM
2

So we should outlaw abortion because: If you don't want to be a parent, be smart and use protection! When used correctly, there is a very small chance pregnancy can happen ??
/r/MensRights18/12/18 12:25 AM
2

Man you are backwards as shit.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 12:22 AM
4

We’ve long since passed that point of equilibrium.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 04:20 PM
6

You’re right, it would be fucked up. Just like it’s fucked up for me to expect everyone else to be responsible for my decisions.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 04:27 PM
5

At least try to properly understand the argument before you attacks the person making it.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 04:22 PM
5

The “pay gap” as discussed in popular culture is a gap based on gender discrimination. And this study, and others , have debunked the idea that it is due to discrimination.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 04:20 PM
8

Then it would stand to reason that the rest of this big family should have a say in who and how more members of the family are created.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 04:03 PM
2

Mong is not a good term to use, dude.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 03:35 PM
3

The term feminism is lost too. For good reason too, as it’s an unnecessarily gendered term for something that is supposed to be about equality.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 03:34 PM
12

The fact that this needs to be explained means it’s a bad term.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 03:31 PM
3

I’m sorry there isn’t an international douchebag day for you.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 11:40 PM
4

That’s not what feminism means anymore.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 11:33 PM
1

It wasn’t all over the place. Maybe if you have a victim complex you might have thought it was all over the place. It was not.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 09:21 PM
1

Yeah, no. Maybe if you are watching news that is specifically tailored to fit the narrative that all the other news is "freaking the fuck out" or obsessed with everything anti-trump. Or maybe if you consider tweets to be "the media".
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:32 PM
-3

That is what she was making a statement about? Jesus, that just makes it worse for her.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 03:49 PM
0

What media is obsessing about her clothing? Did she make a statement saying this was the case? The jacket is like a $40 job from Zara or something like that. It definitely wasn’t just a coincidence, it was definitely a statement piece. One could argue it was a dog whistle.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 02:48 PM
8

No it doesn’t.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 04:42 PM
11

I think men find themselves trapped by circumstances more often, and are left with no other dignified option. Child custody, divorce rape, false accusations, pressure of being provider/breadwinner, etc. Feminism ignores, downplays, or actively fights in opposition to men’s attempts to better those situations.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 01:58 PM
5

I’ve always been cautious of Berkshire because it is so synonymous with Buffet, and when he dies/retires, the stock will take a hit.
/r/MGTOW25/09/18 08:01 PM
2

There is a very good point to be made that there are potentially a lot of Brian Banks in prisons across this country. If you throw the book at this lady, do you think that will make other false accusers more of less likely to come forward? I feel like we should set very stiff penalties for false accusations, but at the same time, offer a period of criminal amnesty for accusers of victims currently serving time, so that we can clear those cases and start with a “fresh slate”.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 03:55 PM
2

If we are committed to the ideals of justice, I don’t see how this is avoidable other than women taking responsibility and making their statements despite any perceived skepticism they may encounter.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 03:46 PM
30

Law enforcement and prosecutors are probably the largest part of the problem. The whole feminist push to “believe victims” is only going to make that worse. It’s true that stiffer penalties for false accusations could result in fewer people coming forward, but you can shape the penalty to incentivize coming forward earlier. For example, before conviction occurs, it would be misdemeanor. After verdict (either guilty or nonguilty), it’s felony, and sex offenders list. And double whatever time has …
/r/MensRights23/09/18 03:38 PM
2

She is now a Level 1 Sex Offender, which means low risk of reoffense, and she'll be off the list in 20 years.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:16 PM
9

Three quarters of women answer that question objectively?
/r/MensRights21/08/18 02:20 PM
0

That can still fit within equality of opportunity though. For example, there is no rule in most of the major leagues that only men can play. You could theoretically see an female NFL kicker. Those athletes are judged by their abilities alone, and that's why women aren't signed.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 08:39 PM
1

I’d would argue that straight white women have the most privilege, even from a power dynamics perspective.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/18 06:22 PM
2

Male privilege’ is a thing because men (primarily straight white men) have been identified to have more societal privileges than others who don’t fit that demographic. This is the exact problem with how the term is used and understood. It does not (or at least it should not) have anything to do with the quantity. Privilege can be ascribed to minorities in certain regards. I.t doesn’t take an abundance of privilege to have privilege. Women have a ton of privilege, arguably more than men.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/18 03:07 PM
1

Dude, hormones change everything. Has your wife gone through menopause yet?
/r/MensRights28/07/18 08:04 PM
3

If he is taller than his son, then his son is not 6’1”
/r/MGTOW20/07/18 01:18 AM
4

Donald Trump is not 6'3".
/r/MGTOW19/07/18 04:58 PM
32

He died because he wasn't a trained cave diver, he was a navy seal. There's a difference in skills.
/r/MGTOW10/07/18 04:48 PM
2

nah, but it's a restaurant that spins around.
/r/MGTOW06/07/18 05:14 PM
3

Could be the Space Needle.
/r/MGTOW06/07/18 05:08 PM
6

That's weird, because you just made a pro-life argument. Abortion should be outlawed because: hypothetically, you actively chose to have sex. Knowing, full well, the potential repercussions of that. If participants don't like the potential outcome... don't have sex.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 10:48 PM
1

So you are pro-life?
/r/MensRights02/07/18 10:40 PM
0

Why do you keep supporting its use then?
/r/MensRights27/06/18 10:20 PM
-1

It’s a demonstrably shitty term.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 10:05 PM
11

It’s a demonstrably shitty term. It also cannot be decoupled from toxic femininity, but feminism insists it can.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 10:03 PM
2

So you should just say that you are pro life, instead of speaking specifically of men.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/18 03:43 PM
3

So you are prolife, except in cases of risk to the mother, rape and incest?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/18 03:27 PM
6

Right, and do you buy the republicans argument there? Are you pro life?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/18 03:03 PM
9

You like to swear a lot, because you probably think it makes your argument stronger. It doesn’t. I’ll try it out though. You know damned well that this goes both ways. If your argument is that men took the risk when they entered sexual relations, and that they need to live with the consequences, then you just made a pro-life, anti-abortion argument. Are you pro-life?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/18 03:02 PM
4

I love the “don’t have sex” argument because you can so easily turn that same argument “don’t have sex” into a pro-life, anti abortion argument, which will usually cause them to realize the error in that logic.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/18 02:57 PM
4

It should be a chip to bargain. That’s the whole idea. It is meant to provide some form of power, ANY form of power over the decision. The woman gets to make the final decision, of course.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/18 02:53 PM
2

I feel bad for the real father as well. He will probably never know of his child.
/r/MGTOW01/06/18 09:11 PM
1

Don't worry, you'll grow up sometime.
/r/MGTOW01/06/18 07:04 PM
3

or just made up. There is a @timdoll account, but it isn't this person, and it has existed since before Avicii died. So it's not just that they "changed their username"
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:15 PM
2

Is the post really MSM?
/r/MGTOW22/04/18 03:09 PM
6

I don’t think anyone was mocking zuckerberg because he was short, they were mocking his insecurities about his height, and using a booster when it isn’t necessary for any reason other than to appear taller.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 05:50 PM
25

/r/nicegirls
/r/MensRights28/03/18 02:42 PM
19

It’s ignorance, narcissism and greed mostly.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 02:41 PM
8

First off, I’m not talking about women, I’m talking about feminism. Those terms are key tenants of feminism. And yet I have never heard a single feminist use the term “toxic masculinity” or even “matriarchy”. There is no fairness in feminism, because there is no self reflection or sense of responsibility in feminism and that’s my point. There are common sense and fair women all over, my wife is one of them. She is not a feminist.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 02:40 PM
17

Are they sympathetic enough to self reflect on how their actions contribute to the problem, or are they insistent that its patriarchy and toxic masculinity that is the problem?
/r/MensRights28/03/18 02:19 PM
0

Yeah, I disagree with that, they do a very thorough job of investigating the claims in most cases.
/r/MGTOW23/03/18 08:45 PM
1

Do you care to back up your assertions with citations? I have never seen any reason to not trust snopes.
/r/MGTOW23/03/18 03:42 PM
7

I mean, let’s not jump to conclusions. She could be running to get a gun.
/r/MGTOW20/03/18 02:51 PM
4

Don’t you normally get you room assigned when you check into your hotel? Did she check into her hotel from the plane? Or does she keep a hotel room at all times, even when she is an 8 hour flight away?
/r/MensRights15/03/18 02:25 PM
20

The fact is, you cannot decouple "toxic masculinity" from "toxic feminity", even though feminism would want you to believe the later doesn't even exist, let alone a cause of "toxic masculinity". Furthermore, "toxic masculinity" really can't be decoupled from masculinity itself, and everything good about masculinity. Like the selflessness of those heroes that put their bodies on the line to save others. fuck I hate that term.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:27 PM
3

OK, so I wouldn't call it rape then, because it doesn't sound like she would call it rape. But anytime someone says "no" or "stop", you need to stop, unless you are role-playing a rape kink and have discussed it beforehand (also known as consensual non-consent). That much should be absolutely unambiguous.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 10:25 PM
1

If she said no, and you continued to stick your penis in her, then yes that was most likely rape. But only if she says it was. Essentially it's up to her decision on whether she considers herself raped or not. In short, don't put your penis in women that have said no to you.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 08:56 PM
5

Saying that men acted with heroic sacrifice in mass shootings is not an effective counter-argument to feminist ideas about "toxic masculinity". I don't see that as being any different from what you are saying. One man may kill, but three men turned up to sacrifice their own lives for to save the lives of others You are essentially making the same argument.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 08:50 PM
0

It's more of a burden to the tax payers to execute her. You realize that, right?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/18 08:40 PM
7

http://cdn.agilitycms.com/sdm-love-you/Partners/gwh/2017-sep9/revised-assets/Partner-page-header-1200x450-1.jpg?w=1200&h=450
/r/MensRights05/01/18 09:02 PM
6

And then I am "tone policing" and being whiny. You and I both know that I can't win this game, because it's fucking rigged. But thanks for the insults.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 06:32 PM
17

Again, it was purposefully crafted so that people would "choose" not to see that. Do you seriously not recognize the ambiguity in the term? And again, there is no equivalent for toxic females. It's just another example of feminism demonizing masculinity, while maintaining this sliver of "oh that's not our fault, it's your fault" if you don't get it.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 03:31 PM
23

Well yes, absolutely. Don't kid yourself. The term was purposefully crafted to be read both ways, in an attempt to further demonize all masculinity. It's really interesting to me that the term toxic feminity doesn't exist in the feminist lexicon.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 03:12 PM
20

It can be read as a qualifier or as a descriptor. That's how the English language works. And that's the problem.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 02:37 PM
2

First off, I'm not arguing the women deserve more money. Second, I'm not making any comparison with the men's team. Jesus, people are misreading my comment.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/17 10:30 PM
3

Because female empowerment is a message corporations love to spend money on, and women's soccer demographics have a lot of young women and families. Much narrower demographics for targeted campaigns.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/17 08:20 PM
-10

This is true, but women's soccer has incredible sponsorship opportunities.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/17 03:54 PM
3

Is this vile because it only depicts women? Or am I missing something?
/r/MensRights17/07/17 04:48 PM
1

Just because you haven't been caught doesn't mean it's legal. Torrenting copyrighted works is very much illegal.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 02:39 PM
3

I've had some success myself. Not 100%, but majority of my reports are acted upon.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 08:51 PM
2

You have no concept of the commons, do you?
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:11 PM
2

No it's not. It's a preference and that woman should examine how she was speaking to the customer to see if she could have taken a different approach or tone. There could just as easily be a valid request, and that the woman was being rude.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:43 PM
4

It's not provocative when nobody knows what red pill is.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:35 PM
9

Holy shit. That perfectly explains why I hadn't felt right in MensLib.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:33 PM
3

SJWs are not progressives, they are neo-liberals.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:30 PM
3

Big stores like that take a while to fail. And when they do (like now), they try to clearance everything at a store, then whatever doesn't sell goes out to the next store that they clearance, and on and on. It can take a while.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:23 PM
1

Well riding a horse can definitely induce orgasm.
/r/MGTOW05/05/17 02:22 PM
6

So if you needed a kidney transplant to live, and I was the only match that could potentially donate, but I refused to donate, that would make me a murderer? No. Because I'm allowed autonomy over my body. The argument is no different for abortion. The mother cannot be forced to provide her body to save the life of another. It's her body, her choice.
/r/MGTOW05/05/17 02:19 PM
7

It's called rationalizing.
/r/MGTOW24/04/17 03:20 PM
3

Men don't carry bags as frequently as women.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 02:25 PM
29

I'd sit my fat ass right on her bag if someone did that to me.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 08:43 PM
7

You'd think that for "a writer and standup comic", she would write something that is at least partially funny. Especially for a topic like this, but she didn't. Not a single joke worthy of a chuckle. Also no mention of a boyfriend or husband either, so that's also telling.
/r/MGTOW09/04/17 05:49 PM
5

Her real account was probably banned as well.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 01:12 PM
11

It's not that the punishment is not fair for the crime that is pussypass. It's that the punishment is much more lenient than what an adult male would receive. I agree that we shouldn't be throwing people in jail for such crimes, but that's not the issue here.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 05:27 PM
53

I've said this before, and I'll say it again. Feminism is why we ended up with Trump. Feminists overlooked the fact that Clinton was a very, very flawed candidate, because they wanted a woman. That's it. And because of that, we ended up with Clinton and not Bernie. And now we have President Trump.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/17 11:01 PM
3

You should do it only on the condition that they allow you to write an article on international mens day too.
/r/MGTOW07/03/17 05:33 PM
12

HR and Marketing departments would be empty.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 05:18 PM
4

It's devastating. I was lucky to get out of my situation, but I called it being held "emotional hostage".
/r/MensRights24/02/17 09:42 PM
395

Or threatening suicide.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 03:22 PM
4

I'm far left and would also like to apologize for Lena Dunham.
/r/PussyPass23/02/17 04:51 PM
2

[citation needed] As long as you are as capable, work as hard, and can integrate in the team culture, there is no reason the trades would ostracize a woman.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 01:08 AM
3

First off, that sounds like quite the outlier, and isn't going to be the cause of any statistically significant wage difference. But also, you have the means to rectify a situation like that, you don't have to choose to accept it. Or you are exaggerating the offense, in which case, you could also choose to not be offended and/or threatened by it.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 01:07 AM
1

Yeah, but that's just internalized misogyny. /s
/r/MensRights01/02/17 01:11 AM
3

Here's what you do. The state pays for those 18 years instead of this poor sap. Then, after the 18 years are up, the mother pays the state child support for the next 18 years to pay it back.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 05:01 AM
3

Why would the reputation of the firm cause you to doubt that? Do reputable firms stay reputable by hiring hacks?
/r/MensRights24/01/17 12:30 AM
1

What are the chances she would come forward at all, if she knew she could be facing jail time? He would still be in jail and we wouldn't be having this conversation right now.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 03:37 PM
3

Do you think she would have come forward at all, if there were a threat of jail time for her there? No. this man would have rotted in jail. St least now we have some justice and this innocent person is free again.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 03:33 PM
1

If she knew she could face jail time, why would she come forward at all? Unfortunately If you start levying punishments on these people, then they won't ever recant, and the innocent person would die in jail. When you say you'd rather let guilty go free than imprison an innocent person, she is the guilty you are talking about. She has to go free, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 03:31 PM
8

That's fine, but excuse me if I don't think the University would be acting in good conscience here.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 06:51 PM
10

What is and isn't "toxic" is subjective though. And that's my primary problem with it. For example, being "competitive" could easily be defined as toxic, when I see it as nothing even close to being toxic. Same with being assertive, or sexual, or other alpha traits. To some, those are toxic. To me, that's being a human. When feminists start to demonize those traits in the abstract, but at the same time, women celebrate those traits in men in real life, then that's a problem.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 06:16 PM
1

See comment about cockpit doors.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 12:14 AM
2

First off. Other passengers would stop a terrorist with a knife, in a post 9/11 world. Second, cockpits are locked now. Third, and this is just rational opinion, subjective, but a plane or two going down does not represent enough of a threat to spend all this money, and obstruct all this travel and waste all these people's time. If there were a second set of airports/airlines without TSA, I would fly that instead, because the threat risk is far less than the response we've come up with (TSA), an…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 04:14 PM
1

The difference I see, is that while feminism acknowledges male rights, they place the blame for men inequalities back on men, which is not productive (or accurate)
/r/MensRights19/12/16 04:01 PM
22

Let's not bring abortion into this.
/r/MGTOW12/12/16 07:57 PM
2

You hate birthdays too, right? Just because you take an opportunity to celebrate something for a moment doesn't mean you can't celebrate it other days, nor does exclude others. That's your own fucked up rational.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 04:25 AM
2

Why does it bother you so much that different people have their own days? Can we not celebrate our differences? Are you also against black history month?
/r/MensRights19/11/16 04:48 PM
5

There's also no reason to willfully deny the differences. Masculinity has strengths and femininity has its strengths, but they are different. Just because they should be equal doesn't mean they should be the same.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 12:46 AM
7

She can roll it straight into a political career.
/r/MGTOW16/11/16 03:09 PM
2

Oh I have the streaming only plan, maybe that could be it.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 11:18 PM
2

Can you do that on mobile? All I get when I search is "titles relating to"
/r/MensRights09/11/16 05:40 PM
2

Unless for have 7 figures in the bank, I'm not ok with anyone self-insuring.
/r/MGTOW01/11/16 02:56 PM
1

Women are very privileged. Especially the ones in college. The same is true in the US
/r/MGTOW27/10/16 03:26 PM
7

It sure makes things more difficult. I can't hit up happy hour after work with my mates because I have to go home and feed my dog. I can't take off on a whim for a weekend, because I have to secure a dog sitter. I have to clean my house much more frequently because there is dog hair (and smell) all over. That tinder slut finally wants to come over? Shit. Well, I guess I will spend the next 30 minutes sweeping and vacuuming instead of manscaping. Now, if you have a neighbor or someone you trust t…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/16 08:27 PM
14

It's interesting to note that there is no "International Day of the Boy" or "International Day of the Child"
/r/MGTOW11/10/16 11:01 PM
3

I'm at 6 figures as a sysadmin with no degree or noteable certs, fwiw.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/16 12:49 AM
21

I used to use the "lets bake some cookies at my house" line. It works. The best part is that you can put the cookies in the oven, turn to them and say "we have 30 minutes to kill, but I only need 10, lets go"
/r/TheRedPill12/09/16 02:32 PM
14

Me too. I hate to see reason and logic be horribly down voted, even in cases where I disagree with what's being said. None of the comments suggesting men should be able to paper-abort were rude or insulting, but the other side was spewing so much hates and angst. It fucking frustrating to see that.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 11:26 PM
2

You say that as if gag orders prevent the name of the accused from public realm or news stories. They don't. Most of the social damage is done before the suspect is even arraigned. Hell, newspapers even print the names and ages of accused prior to arraignment. You said you are a lawyer, you should know this shit then. Why do I assume the social circle would find out at all? Because they fucking do. This shit doesn't happen in a vacuum. Anyone present at the time of arrest will spread that inform…
/r/MensRights19/08/16 09:25 PM
4

Why does anyone else need to hear about an accusation for this to be damaging? That social circle is a persons entire life. Absolutely nothing? Give me a fucking break. You are hugely discounting the potential for damages. Hugely. I am not at all conceding your point that media is not allowed to publish accusations. They do, all the time. It's not "rare" as you insist. They just attach the word "allegedly" to the accused crime and everything is peachy.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 06:20 PM
1

I understand your reasoning, and it is sound. But are we going to completely ignore the damages a person faces merely by being accused of this crime? Even if no charges are filed.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 05:37 PM
1

In the USA, that's the whole reason people are more likely to please No Contest on a charge, so that their conviction can't be used against them in civil court.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 05:35 PM
3

You don't know what this means. I don't? What was her ultimate goal by making this false accusation? You don't think she wanted to see him imprisoned? it would be awful policy to hold a witness criminally accountable for the prosecution failing to meet its burden of proof. No one is arguing for that. No one. And the media isn't the only concern in accusations (or even the primary concern). Friends, family, coworkers, professional associates, etc, can all easily catch wind of accusations, and the…
/r/MensRights19/08/16 05:32 PM
2

I like this idea. Maybe our gynocentric society would realize how fucked up the Sexual Offenders Registry is and amend it, instead of ignoring the problem because it only affects men.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 04:30 PM
4

The point is that this woman intended to ruin his life, she made this accusations so that he would go to jail, get labeled a sex offender, lose his job and not be able to get another one, get hurt in jail, etc. She WANTED all those things to happen and took actions in the hopes that it would be the outcome. She was seeking false imprisonment. The outcome of the original rape case shouldn't have any bearing on the actual false accusation. It's not irrelevant at all. You are being extremely dismis…
/r/MensRights19/08/16 04:21 PM
1

This is lying that has immense material damages.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 04:13 PM
3

Bullshit. In the risk/reward paradigm, you must increase the risk to even the balance so this shit stops happening.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 04:06 PM
3

That a damn false equivalency.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 04:01 PM
1

As if that was really Donald trump, right?
/r/TheRedPill29/07/16 02:34 PM
4

Rape doesn't require violence at all, just so you know. Unfortunately in those cases, there isn't much physical evidence, especially if there is delayed reporting. But you still can't convict someone without any evidence. That's not how our justice system works, and if that means some criminals go free, well, that a better outcome than jailing innocent people.
/r/MGTOW28/07/16 02:40 PM
5

This was my favorite part: The most common reason for departure is the working conditions (e.g. no advancement, number of hours, low salary). Like none of those "working conditions" solely apply to females, and would equally affect males. Is it just that the males know they need to work hard for those things?
/r/MGTOW22/07/16 10:57 PM
116

Salespeople will fuck over the ignorant regardless of gender. It just happens to be that women tend to be more ignorant about cars.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 09:48 PM
1

I think it's hot. Ultimately it's a subjective. Some love it, some hate it.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/16 03:25 PM
7

I was actually very impressed with Bidens speech, he definitely made the issue about both genders.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 07:16 PM
1

If he would (or his supporters) recognize how much his privilege has led to his successes in life I would respect him as a person much more than I do now. But he doesn't recognize the privilege, and neither do his supporters, they keep parroting that he "earned everything he has", which is bullshit, or that his wealth is somehow evidence that he is a financial genius or a genius businessperson, which is also bullshit. The guy is a great huckster. He is preying on ignorance, hatred and fear the s…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/16 10:20 PM
3

Did he "earn" that million dollar loan? Or the knowledge that no matter how much risk he takes with his money, he will always be perfectly fine? Did he earn his very expensive education? Or being born into a family that is surrounded by people that were able to advise and mentor on how to invest, negotiate and sell? Did he "earn" the bull market that allowed his investments to flourish? He was born into privilege. Sure he worked hard, but if you think someone starting from nothing working twice …
/r/TheRedPill25/02/16 09:30 PM
2

Bravo, good sir.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 06:34 AM
0

The girl of my dreams will bring me WAY more pleasure than a ridiculous status symbol.
/r/MGTOW13/01/16 05:48 PM
2

If it's the girl of your dreams, why are you dreaming of a girl that is expensive, unreliable, and bitches and moans?
/r/MGTOW13/01/16 05:46 PM
17

It's so clear that Hillary is running identity politics on the basis of her being a female. And it's clear that many many women are voting for her because she's a woman. Is she actually trying to deny that? She's more dense than I thought.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 04:22 PM
9

The Gawker network includes Gawker.com, Deadspin, Lifehacker, Gizmodo, io9, Kotaku, Jalopnik, Jezebel and others.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 08:45 PM
1

How much of this is due to men being smart enough to avoid college these days. The return-on-investment for 4 years degrees is starting to tilt the wrong way, where degrees aren't valued as much, and are costing more and more and more. Could it be that on top of Title IX, men are just rejecting college moreso than women?
/r/MensRights14/12/15 09:15 PM
10

Great stuff. The only thing I disagree with (well, besides the Bible reading) is the allowance. In our family, doing the small chores is an expected part of being in the family, and living in the house. Paying them money for small chores gives the impression that these chores are optional, and that they can expect payment for the deeds that everyone should be expected to do. An allowance also allows you to teach them to budget with a steady income (so that you can put your financial goals on a c…
/r/RedPillParenting30/10/15 12:30 AM
1

Exactly. Instead of being the voice of reason for feminists (explaining that the wage gap is a myth, etc) she ends up pandering, which is not going to affect her numbers with reasonable men. Obama is an african american, but he didn't come out and campaign as a black man. He campaigned as a reasonable person with reasonable opinions, even if those opinions are counter to what is expected from african americans (cops aren't always the enemy, etc). That's the difference.
/r/MGTOW09/10/15 04:43 PM
1

You are giving some very dangerous advice.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 06:44 AM
1

It's not just a single toilet. It's a bathroom with multiple stalls. I think that is where your confusion lies.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 05:42 AM
3

He lost his tutoring job. Isn't that material damage?
/r/MensRights17/07/15 07:59 PM
3

In this case, I'm downvoting you because I feel like I've dropped 10 IQ points just reading your flawed logic, and have lost a lot of hope for humanity, and I don't want that same fate to meet anyone else.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 03:47 PM
1

TeachEarly.org
/r/MensRights13/07/15 03:27 PM
7

Lets just stop buying women drinks. Because if we are really interested in sleeping with them, they sure need to consent. No more free drinks.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 03:17 PM
2

Just like the site redesign took digg down, this woman is what is going to end up taking reddit down.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 07:30 PM
4

and her husband runs a ponzi scheme.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 07:29 PM
0

There are ways to determine which charities are wholesome, you know. You really shouldn't stop giving just because of a couple assholes.
/r/PussyPass22/04/15 01:51 PM
2

While that is true, he very well could have been the ring leader, no? Also, he had a prior arrest record, while the women did not.
/r/PussyPass17/03/15 04:02 PM
19

Seems to me she just opposed the death penalty, and I don't see anything wrong with that. Let's not pretend it's not just revenge.
/r/PussyPass06/03/15 05:07 AM
2

Seems pretty obvious to me that this woman is simply trolling for responses, and hopefully some death threats or something so that she can report on the plight of women on the internet, cashing in on some of that sweet #gamergate buzzword.
/r/PussyPass19/11/14 04:41 PM
2

Have you read any of the book? She has very little writing talent.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/14 06:14 PM
3

I haven't been following the story that closely, but from the articles I've read, I don't see anything about that. Do you have some links I can read?
/r/TheRedPill04/11/14 06:08 PM
-1

Even that wouldn't be an exact analogy, because black people are a minority. Here we are talking about
/r/MensRights16/09/14 07:46 PM
2

My poor child: asked me if her new baby was going to come live with us too because he didn't want her husband beating the new baby. Yes, that was my child's immediate response to finding out she was pregnant. That is so incredibly heart breaking. But you are a good man, and you are raising a good, empathetic child. The above is evidence of that.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 08:24 PM
2

Sorry, but I would rip that shit right off the wall.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 10:41 PM
2

Because parent excludes caretakers that aren't parents. So why not call it Amazon Caretaker? In any case, they explained it like this: Despite the name, you don’t need to be a mom to join. Amazon Mom is open to anyone expecting a baby or caring for a baby or young child, whether you’re a mom, dad, grandparent, or caretaker. We just thought “Amazon Primary Caretaker” didn’t have the same ring to it.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:26 PM
5

"To place Debbie into a Florida state women's penitentiary, to place an attractive young woman in that kind of hellhole, is like putting a piece of raw meat in with the lions." It's interesting that men aren't extended the same courtesy, even after it has been shown that they have been sexually assaulted.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 06:55 PM
1

TRIGGER WARNING, MAN! I'm a vegan! LGBTV?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 05:53 PM
1

So what if they were charging $1,000 for Mexicans to enter, or for a disabled person to enter, or for a homosexual to enter, or for a senior citizen to enter? You think that should be ok?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 11:08 PM
6

I love how they think the power structure is absolute. As if there aren't any specific aspects of life where a female can hold power over a male, or a black person can hold power over a white person.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:10 PM
-3

Both those are relatively new things. You have to take the whole of history into context, and across many different cultures.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 10:06 PM
6

I can tell you are being sarcastic, but there are a lot of commonalities between alcohol prohibition and drug prohibition. So his answer is actually pretty good.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 10:03 PM
-1

No. We don't. In fact, I wish she wasn't on this world.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 05:26 PM
1

Judge Judy is a disaster. I fucking hate her, even despite this quote.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 05:25 PM
3

Then why are you stating your positions on facebook, and inviting debate?
/r/MensRights16/05/12 02:03 PM
17

As long as you don't retweet or reply to her, she isn't going to get anything from you "viewing" the page.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 04:58 PM
22

For the lazy, here is a link to her twitter feed. Though I don't see the post in question. Looks like it has been deleted.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 02:14 PM
6

Warning: manhood academy youtube link
/r/MensRights05/04/12 04:39 PM
0

The idea is so that a person wouldn't feel like they need to stay in the relationship to survive. There are valid reasons to keep the alimony system in place, but there is no doubt in my mind that it is severely abused and needs to be reformed.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 07:13 AM
5

This man's actions seem incredibly childish. How does this address any of the problems?
/r/MensRights09/02/12 06:52 PM
9

Pay for what, the paternity test? You can do this by sending a cheek swab through the mail for $80. You don't need her consent, and you are under no obligation to share the results with her. I would say it's worth it, even despite the physical similarities. Now when you say you were left off the birth certificate, does that mean there is no one listed as father, or is someone else listed?
/r/MensRights07/11/11 06:59 PM
5

Seriously?
/r/MensRights13/09/11 05:32 PM
3

I think the moral of this is to avoid having children.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 05:32 PM
13

Has he ever heard of conspiracy to commit fraud?
/r/MensRights12/07/11 05:04 PM
1

unless there are 3 or more rooms for rent by the same owner.
/r/MensRights28/05/11 05:17 PM
2

Except in advertising. You cannot advertise "no jews" or "no black people" or "girls only".
/r/MensRights28/05/11 05:17 PM
2

Yeah, you can discriminate if you have 3 or fewer units, but you certainly can't advertise a gender preference.
/r/MensRights28/05/11 05:15 PM
1

Are we still posting links to gawker?
/r/MensRights16/04/11 04:07 AM
24

OK, but to be fair. The Police Department hasn't issued a statement, nor has the GMU, or the Library. We don't know who the woman was. So really all we are hearing, is this guy's side of the story. It seems to paint a pretty ugly picture, but it is still only one side, and is uncorroborated. Don't rush to conclusions.
/r/MensRights14/03/11 07:29 PM
3

The science is there, it reduces risk. The problem is that people will think that having their dick cut will somehow make them entirely immune, and then they will engage in more risky behavior, like having unprotected sex.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 10:16 PM
4

No to both, but you didn't answer my question.
/r/MensRights18/12/10 12:40 AM
6

Do you honestly think the horror of a rape lasts only 15 minutes?
/r/MensRights17/12/10 09:36 PM
1

Just because you don't have any accidents or tickets, doesn't mean you are a safe driver, btw. And do you have UIM protection? PIP? If you don't, you should.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 09:48 PM
14

Really? What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights13/10/10 12:09 AM
-4

But does it matter?
/r/MensRights12/10/10 11:19 PM
2

Or you could join the larger movement of Movember
/r/MensRights08/10/10 07:13 PM
5

So what would make you feel better? If your mother said "I'm sorry"? Would that allow you to then maintain a relationship with her? Just get over it. She is your mother. She doesn't have that many more years on the earth, and you are going to fucking miss her when she's gone. If you think she did this maliciously, you're wrong. Your mother loves you and would never purposely do anything to harm you. The sooner you realize that, the sooner you can move forward with your life. Stop holding so much…
/r/MensRights17/09/10 08:14 PM
6

How about an option for "I'm circumcised, and don't believe that circumcision is necessary or prudent, but don't have nearly as big of a problem with it than most of the zealots on reddit"?
/r/MensRights15/09/10 09:10 PM
0

Well, were you waiting your turn, or were you being the asshat that pushes his way to the bar, then immediately yells for the bartender?
/r/MensRights08/09/10 04:29 PM
1

That's a good one.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 04:24 PM
-1

You are totally gay. edit: jesus, it seems like reddit has been a lot worse at detecting sarcasm lately.
/r/MensRights07/09/10 05:14 PM
2

Then you consider that males have been disproportionally hit by the recent recession. I've seen estimates as high as 80% of the jobs lost since the beginning of this recession have been males.
/r/MensRights17/08/10 06:13 PM
1

What evidence did she destroy? Was it proven that she lied? Do you really believe that it is guaranteed that she was lying about being assaulted? How so?
/r/MensRights29/07/10 07:07 PM
1

Yeah, I should have been more clear. "Any time" is a certainly not correct. But I guess I don't see where the article claims she withdrew consent after the fact.
/r/MensRights27/07/10 09:06 PM
-10

OK, but honestly, a rape can still occur even though the person may have previously consented, and even had a relationship. Consent can be withdrawn at any time, right?
/r/MensRights27/07/10 06:36 PM
4

It is absolutely in the interest of a business to fire the consistently abusive customers. Not doing so wastes employee time, creates a hostile workplace, increases employee turnover, and alienates other customers, all of which impacts the company's bottom line. Fact is, an abusive customer isn't a happy customer anyways, and they aren't likely to refer business anyways. You asked for elaboration on how Safeway treats their employee's poorly, and I gave an example. You are still trying to ration…
/r/MensRights02/07/10 11:21 PM
3

Abusive customer determine the company's success? Seems to me you are rationalizing.
/r/MensRights02/07/10 10:07 PM
1

My mother-in-law worked at Safeway, and said they really treated their employees poorly. Nothing extraordinary, but corporate would always side with the customer. For example, if a customer was abusive, they would not allow you to refuse to serve, or ignore, etc. But union busting in and of itself is good enough reason to shop elsewhere, if you ask me.
/r/MensRights02/07/10 09:41 PM
1

Well, I'm actually in favor of a single payer system. But working within the current system (and even for supplemental insurance if we did have a single payer system,) I certainly am in favor of charging higher health care insurance premiums for women.
/r/MensRights30/06/10 12:04 AM
0

Sure, in the most general sense, they are the same product. As in, they are "Auto insurance". But there are so many different aspects that determine the risk of a driver, and thus liabilities of the insurance company, gender being one of them, age, number of miles driven, safety features of the car, geographic location, etc. Each of these things factor into the premium, and each driver has a different "product" customized to their risk levels. Your TV warranty analogy doesn't follow because the …
/r/MensRights29/06/10 10:44 PM
3

Except it is not identical car insurance. The COVERAGE is the same, but the company's liabilities are different, and therefore the product is different, just like the haircuts are different.
/r/MensRights29/06/10 08:28 PM
1

men and women in this case are paying for different things My point exactly. But also, short haired women pay the same rate as long haired women.
/r/MensRights29/06/10 07:38 PM
5

Same reason it's legal to charge women more for haircuts.
/r/MensRights29/06/10 06:13 AM
3

well this screenshot is of a thread from november 2007.
/r/MensRights05/06/10 04:26 AM
4

A few other youtube videos: India's first steps: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kDfrdJ4A1I Dancing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdHl4_j_aso
/r/MensRights30/04/10 05:13 PM
8

What a shitty article.
/r/MensRights29/04/10 10:52 PM
15

He most certainly should NOT be discussing anything that you have said to him with your wife. My best guess is that she is lying, and the psychologist isn't telling her any of that shit.
/r/MensRights16/03/10 09:31 PM
1

It's a huge infringement of privacy. You're incorrect though, because if you are in a public place, there is no expectation of privacy, and therefore it isn't an infringement of privacy.
/r/MensRights11/03/10 08:39 PM
1

Why is that an important point to make? It doesn't matter who is paranoid or prejudice. It remains true that the businesses have every right to trespass this person from their business, and the photographer has every right to continue taking candid photos.
/r/MensRights11/03/10 08:37 PM
0

I'm completely ok with this. The private businesses can do what they want, just like this guy can do what he wants in public spaces. The fact that he broke no law is not a concern. If someone walks into McDonalds everyday and starts screaming at the top of his lungs, that is not illegal, but it is disruptive to the business, and the business has a right to trespass him from the building. This is really not much different.
/r/MensRights11/03/10 08:34 PM
1

That's exactly right. You have no expectation of privacy.
/r/MensRights11/03/10 08:30 PM
3

What you are saying is correct. But the advice given to a man being sexually harassed and the advice given to a woman being sexually harassed SHOULD be different, precisely because there is an inequality. Men should probably go on the defensive. The advice I would give him is to first be sure that his boss is aware of this occurring. This is to cover yourself, so that if the woman doesn't like the man reject her, she won't be able to go any cry sexual harassment out of spite, or for retribution.…
/r/MensRights03/03/10 12:10 AM
10

Dude, you just opened up a whole can of worms. Reddit as a whole is very anti-circumcision. My son will be born in about two months. I am circumcised, and I don't really see any problem with circumcision, but I will not be circumcising my son. But I will probably be downvoted for saying that "I don't really see any problem with circumcision".
/r/MensRights24/02/10 07:50 PM
3

I fully intend to install a urinal into the home I buy.
/r/MensRights15/01/10 09:50 PM
1

breast cancer is much, much more common You're wrong about that. Which reaffirms the idea that prostate cancer needs more awareness.
/r/MensRights12/01/10 11:31 PM
1

This doesn't belong in /r/MensRights
/r/MensRights05/01/10 09:22 PM
5

It's $58/week, btw.
/r/MensRights03/12/09 06:27 AM
-2

percent is one word
/r/MensRights10/11/09 07:13 AM
1

thanks, now I don't have to say it.
/r/MensRights09/12/08 05:26 AM
1

well here's a quick story. My girlfriend is a private school teacher, in a school where ALL the teachers, assistants, and administrators are women. When it came time to hire a new assistant, she wanted to hire a man. Because she thought the children would benefit from a male in the classroom.. After watching the boys and girls (but especially the boys) in the classroom flock to any male that walks through the door. It seems that the children want to have interaction with with a male, and it woul…
/r/MensRights21/11/08 11:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter